I need a kernel for wired tether. Was wondering is one was available?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Shouldn't they all support PDANet? That's what I'm using. Granted, I'm still stock.
Are you having an issue with one?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
WhiteWidows said:
I need a kernel for wired tether. Was wondering is one was available?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The newest MixUp
DevinXtreme said:
The newest MixUp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup the newest Mixup kernel has that support.
What's the difference between the wireless tether in MixUp and PDANet?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
PDAnet requires extra software installed on the PC side of things, whereas everything needed for Wired Tether is already there by default in Windows and Linux distros like Ubuntu. PDAnet's way is also a bit slower and more hackish in my experience.
Thanks. I'll have to check it out.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
gophergun said:
whereas everything needed for Wired Tether is already there by default in Windows and Linux distros like Ubuntu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On Windows you still need to install the Samsung USB drivers so that Windows will recognize the RNDIS device on the phone, but this is essentially true.
Yes, please do try the latest MixUp kernel. You'll also need the modified version of android-wired-tether that supports the Epic kernel. The step-by-step directions to use the wired tether client are in that thread, although it shouldn't be terribly difficult.
Please do report if you have success with it. I'm looking for confirmation that it works from a few other folks before forwarding the wired-tether patch upstream.
mkasick said:
Please do report if you have success with it. I'm looking for confirmation that it works from a few other folks before forwarding the wired-tether patch upstream.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have used the MixUp Kernel and wired-tether.apk from the thread mentioned above with no issues.
dereknjenny04 said:
I have used the MixUp Kernel and wired-tether.apk from the thread mentioned above with no issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great! Thanks for letting me know.
Related
Wifi tether! I hate to beat a dead horse...BUT, for the life of me, I can't get thethering to work. Logs look good, not sure if I am missing something simple. Laptop see's the ap but won't connect. I tried every version of tether and no luck.
I am running stock dk28 with the epic exp. rom 2.0.7
Sent from my apple eating android, using XDA App
b8ascrub said:
Wifi tether! I hate to beat a dead horse...BUT, for the life of me, I can't get thethering to work. Logs look good, not sure if I am missing something simple. Laptop see's the ap but won't connect. I tried every version of tether and no luck.
I am running stock dk28 with the epic exp. rom 2.0.7
Sent from my apple eating android, using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can't be using stock dk28 if your using a custom rom..you mean to say epic exp rom + stock dk28 kernel..(err..sorry couldn't help myself >.>)
Anyways, you are using Android-Wifi-Tether version 2.05? (you can get it on the marketpalce now)
b8ascrub said:
Wifi tether! I hate to beat a dead horse...BUT, for the life of me, I can't get thethering to work. Logs look good, not sure if I am missing something simple. Laptop see's the ap but won't connect. I tried every version of tether and no luck.
I am running stock dk28 with the epic exp. rom 2.0.7
Sent from my apple eating android, using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use pre11 or pre8 versions they work.
lviv73 said:
Use pre11 or pre8 versions they work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2.0.5 final was released recently and its on the market..
The new release doesn't support infrastructure mode on the Epic.
Slvrshot said:
The new release doesn't support infrastructure mode on the Epic.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do any versions? I thought not
Sent from my Epic 4g powered by EE Froyo, Emotionless Beast themed!
formula84 said:
Do any versions? I thought not
Sent from my Epic 4g powered by EE Froyo, Emotionless Beast themed!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no idea, but I know that this has suddenly become a big topic in the last few days.
Saw that on jts aosp that it is not ok to tether on his build, does this go for dl30 as well?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
From what I understand yes... currently the kernel has a way to tell if tethering is taking place...
stupid question. I can still teather with what I'm running correct? or can they now detect me too?
Rocking dj05 and jt's voodoo 5
neh4pres said:
stupid question. I can still teather with what I'm running correct? or can they now detect me too?
Rocking dj05 and jt's voodoo 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're fine, it's DL30-specific.
I'm curious what all it detects, as in does it just detect the hack to let you use the 3G Mobile Hotspot app for free? Or does it detect most of the market apps as well, like Barnacle, Wireless Tether, etc? And, of course, is anyone working on ripping that out yet?
Whoever gets to the bottom of this and fixes this will most definitely receive a donation from me.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Does this apply just to jt's aosp, or does it apply to the stock verizon build that adrynalyn posted as well?
I believe it applies to both, with Kaoscinate being the only Froyo-based rom not impacted- although I don't know for sure.
UTvol said:
Does this apply just to jt's aosp, or does it apply to the stock verizon build that adrynalyn posted as well?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You just asked my very same question that started this thread and it had been answered twice before your post and a third after
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Not effecting kaosinate bc what we have is on 2.29
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Does it exist? Seems a lot are based on EVO shift and no hdmi
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
pabdaddy1995 said:
Does it exist? Seems a lot are based on EVO shift and no hdmi
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HDMI capability is going to be based on the kernel not the ROM.
Now, is there a kernel compatible with Sense 2.1 or 3.0 that has the drivers for HDMI?
Not sure, haven't looked.
EDIT: I'm going to guess no, but that may not be entirely accurate.
HDMI Kernel
Hey Guys I am running a GB Rom and have HDMI mirroring working on 720p .
Just search and download the file and flash this Kernel and your Good to go =)
I could not post link to download because I dont have alot of post on this site yet. But just search for the file and you will find what you are looking for.
HDMwIn/2.3.3-1-793-HDMwIn-Sense233-Alpha-signed.zip
pabdaddy1995 said:
Does it exist? Seems a lot are based on EVO shift and no hdmi
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have successfully ported the current code of HDMwIn into the freedom kernel I have been developing. Rom depending it does work and works great. I am currently running Miks 2.55 and it works awesome.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=16129960#post16129960
lithid-cm said:
I have successfully ported the current code of HDMwIn into the freedom kernel I have been developing. Rom depending it does work and works great. I am currently running Miks 2.55 and it works awesome.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=16129960#post16129960
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using Synergy (no God Mode) with your aggressive kernel & mirroring works perfect on it too, to OP, pick your poison =)
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
As far as I can recall, there are currently 3 kernels for sense that support hdmi. As mentioned above, lithids freedom kernel, which works well and also has undervolting and oc/uc capabilities, chop suey kernel 9.26 and 9.27, and the latest poon sense kernel.
Sent from my PC36100 using xda premium
Mirroring on MikG/Less Freedom
lithid-cm said:
I have successfully ported the current code of HDMwIn into the freedom kernel I have been developing. Rom depending it does work and works great. I am currently running Miks 2.55 and it works awesome.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=16129960#post16129960
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here, Lithid (thanks!). Something feels good about seeing my kernel's developer endorsing my rom of choice. MikG and Lithid Freedom were my first (and remain the only) OS/kernel flashes after rooting my OTA Gingerbreaded EVO. The combo has been equally stable to stock while affording more functionality including plug-and-play HDMwIn.
cool thanks
FROYO
http://www.qap.la/~netarchy/
GB
http://kernels.teamw.in/files.php?fid=711&kid=337
http://www.mediafire.com/?0dxde4clck4xo#2jldterwp81jq,1
http://code.google.com/p/chopsuey/downloads/list
pabdaddy1995 said:
Does it exist? Seems a lot are based on EVO shift and no hdmi
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not CM7,NOT miui,i just need a great 2.3 kernel! Just use for JVS/JVT and so on!
the Talon kernel is good ,but not great ,its color is not good enough,even use by voodoo control,and the battery life is a lit short.
i dont care about the GPS,i just want a more smooth kernel.
---------------------------------------
I can give you two kernels,you can try them.
Explain：
1.GalaxianEE_JVS.tar is i9000's kernel,but you can try it ,just no sound,the other function is ok（not conside GPS）.
2.lidroid kernel 1.6 is vibrant's kernel,you can try it,it's a good kernel,but just have 329 RAM.
3. you can use oldin to manage these two kernel. they can be used by 2.34 JVQ/JVS/JVT, just try!
my english is bad, i wish all of you can understand what i said.sorry
I'll ask Mr.Walter the leprechaun to make it next week.
Its called Talon
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Jasonhunterx said:
Its called Talon
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its good not great. Once GPS is implemented I'd agree.
Sent from my T959 using xda premium
xriderx66 said:
I'll ask Mr.Walter the leprechaun to make it next week.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you
.
JediDru said:
Its good not great. Once GPS is implemented I'd agree.
Sent from my T959 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Excuse my french but **** gps never ever used
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I m on Simply Stock XXJVT running on Lidriod 1.7 JVT Kernel. It works great, except GPS.
I do not understand why making a kernel is so difficult. Can some one explain this please?
lifehijack said:
I do not understand why making a kernel is so difficult. Can some one explain this please?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. Its a kernel from a firmware and base that was not meant for our phones.
2. No kernel is perfect, even if it was made by Samsung themselves.
3. Android kernels are Linux kernels, can only be compiled in Linux and sometimes Mac, never in Windows.
4. Kernel deving can sometimes be hard and frustrating, especially if it was ported from another device. Sometimes the drivers and modules don't work right when they are compiled, causing less than great battery life and some errors. It happens. Its just another side effect when dealing with ports from other phones.
Sent from my XDA app cuz i'm stalking your mom.....
Thanks for the info. I m very happy to own a Galaxy S as it keeps getting updates but sad to own a Vibrant as Samsung/T-Mobile just forgot this device.
This is to the devs, I'm sure you've all heard about the program Canonical is running to get Ubuntu on the Nexus 7. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Nexus7/Installation http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/27/ubuntu-nexus-7-installer/
Anywhere here's the link, I hope you guys can get this to work because the lapdock and native ubuntu would be the best. I know it's a leap, but it would be sweet.
jeffreygtab said:
This is to the devs, I'm sure you've all heard about the program Canonical is running to get Ubuntu on the Nexus 7. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Nexus7/Installation http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/27/ubuntu-nexus-7-installer/
Anywhere here's the link, I hope you guys can get this to work because the lapdock and native ubuntu would be the best. I know it's a leap, but it would be sweet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the odds of them supporting EOL'd Tegra2 devices is pretty damn remote.
consolation said:
I think the odds of them supporting EOL'd Tegra2 devices is pretty damn remote.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wasn't referring to Canonical supporting us... That's kind of why I was hoping devs would see this. Maybe it could be modified for our device after/if we get a proper kernel/drivers and regardless it's pretty interesting even if you don't own the device.
Moved to the appropriate forum.
Ain't there already nvidia tegra kernel for linux? We would only need some drivers for more gsm related stuff. (But only if anyone wants to make calls)
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
krystianp said:
Ain't there already nvidia tegra kernel for linux? We would only need some drivers for more gsm related stuff. (But only if anyone wants to make calls)
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are drivers for Linux but it would be a huge work from our devs to manage booting on a kernel that supports these drivers.
There is archlinux build for nvidia tegra2 developers board called trimslice. Ready to boot.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
krystianp said:
There is archlinux build for nvidia tegra2 developers board called trimslice. Ready to boot.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's for the tegra 2, but I believe it's either the harmony/ventena board, so it's similar but different from ours.
EDIT: and I know this has been discussed before, but would this http://www.nvidia.com/content/devzone/linux-for-tegra.html assist at all in native port?
From what i learned lately. Android kernel works differently in some aspects than linux. I think we could we could replace safetly any kernel with that from nvidia with ventana support(of course without gsm, gps support). Someone said that android kernel doesn't probe hardware just directly connects to it. On the other hand linux kernel does probe hardware so if anything would be not supported it wouldn't use it, so instead generic drivers would be used (like on x86). Or am i totally wrong?
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app