Database Users

Post your official Froyo /Gingerbread bechmarks here (without lagfix)

post your official froyo / Gingerbread bechmarks here (without lagfix)
if you got upgrade via kies

Got jp6 trough norwegian kies
1020 is highest before lagfix
2015 is highest after oclf lagfix
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

as I've noticed before, without lagfix on 2.1 the I/O check takes ages
but as compare,
2.1 without lagfix around 850
2.2 without lagfix around 1000
2.1 with lagfix around 2200
2.2 with lag fix, not tested yet, need to find a root

AsgardCurse said:
as I've noticed before, without lagfix on 2.1 the I/O check takes ages
but as compare,
2.1 without lagfix around 850
2.2 without lagfix around 1000
2.1 with lagfix around 2200
2.2 with lag fix, not tested yet, need to find a root
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here is a root for you
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=788108
OCLF only boost IO on Galaxy s : nexus 1 is still way faster in processor optimization test and this is what we need in galaxy s

dadyal said:
OCLF only boost IO on Galaxy s : nexus 1 is still way faster in processor optimization test and this is what we need in galaxy s
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Faster in real world performance or in synthetic benchmarks?

DarthV said:
Faster in real world performance or in synthetic benchmarks?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess for using FPU intensive task, like Mathematical design, database, encoding video or MP3, file sharing and sugh... :|
For me, I use the phone for mostly GPU intense task, such as taking pictures/video, listening to video, gaming, browsing pictures, etc. so I asume that better gpu makes it better all around eh!
Kinda like being able to lift heavy wieght but doing a desk job I assume!
(BTW, sorry for the sarcasm )

2.2 without lagfix 1001

2.1
before: 854
after: 2273

Sorry guy for a stupid question but which app are you using for the benchmark test?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

Quadrant Standard banchmark - U can find it in market
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

Thx for the app info! I got 1010
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

t1mman said:
I guess for using FPU intensive task, like Mathematical design, database, encoding video or MP3, file sharing and sugh... :|
For me, I use the phone for mostly GPU intense task, such as taking pictures/video, listening to video, gaming, browsing pictures, etc. so I asume that better gpu makes it better all around eh!
Kinda like being able to lift heavy wieght but doing a desk job I assume!
(BTW, sorry for the sarcasm )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So wouldn't benchmarks for your specific application be better than synthetic benchmarks suck as linpack and quadrant? The snapdragon CPU in the n1 is very very friendly with linpack (NEON + 128bit SIMD). I doubt that the hummingbird in our SGSs will ever score as high, but that doesn't mean that real performance is going to be worse. And well quadrant is pretty much a joke or at least how it weights cpu/gpu/io.
Maybe someone group will get a bunch of phones together and test things like gaming speed, web render times etc etc. That would be meaningful.

DarthV said:
So wouldn't benchmarks for your specific application be better than synthetic benchmarks suck as linpack and quadrant? The snapdragon CPU in the n1 is very very friendly with linpack (NEON + 128bit SIMD). I doubt that the hummingbird in our SGSs will ever score as high, but that doesn't mean that real performance is going to be worse. And well quadrant is pretty much a joke or at least how it weights cpu/gpu/io.
Maybe someone group will get a bunch of phones together and test things like gaming speed, web render times etc etc. That would be meaningful.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you mean VFP? the Hummingbird is the one with the ARM Neon chip...
VFP is pretty much a floating point accelerator which is why benchmarks are so high on linpack which calculates floating points.

my score is 1034, was over 2000 before Froyo update

Lostja said:
my score is 1034, was over 2000 before Froyo update
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you got this update via kies ?
i flashed JPA and it go 970 - 1050

960 without
How to do the OCLF? It says "Unavailable" on everything...
Edit: got it fixed
1819 with

If everything shows unavailable check the following:
Phone is Rooted,
Ext2 tools installed,
BATTERY MUST BE MORE THAN 40%
last one is the one that most people dont check

Score was around 1008 with standard Froyo. (Kies update)
With root and lagfix i get around 1873.
With official Enclair and lagfix i could easily get 2200+ points.

970. not the best!

frankatboy said:
If everything shows unavailable check the following:
Phone is Rooted,
Ext2 tools installed,
BATTERY MUST BE MORE THAN 40%
last one is the one that most people dont check
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Battery is more than 40%.
How do I root and install Ext2? (stupid question I know but I am new lol). I see it can root and install ext2 as well, but those are unavailable too.
Edit: *fixed* 1819 with lagfix

Quadrant scores

I'm interested to find out what quadrant scores people have been getting.
I finally managed to get 2.2 running and I'm consistently scoring around 1275.
Kris

1379 on 2.2 1.3

digthemlows said:
1379 on 2.2 1.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's alright. I have 1.3 of Steve's build too, have you trimmed down running services?

Ive lost about 100 points since I flashed 2.2 1.3. I can barely break 1100 now.

hahaha beat 606 on 1.6

1323...getting up now

Unkkut said:
1323...getting up now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What did you do to improve your score?

Wow! I just installed SetCPU, thinking that it might improve my score. With SetCPU installed and the min/max set to 998 I got 1061. I uninstalled SetCPU and and tried again. Got my best score yet - 1322.
Weird, I would have thought that SetCPU would improve performance.

Just got an 1880

Unkkut said:
Just got an 1880
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Running what ROM? How on Earth did you pull that kind of score off? That's 500 more than anyone I've seen.

I just registered 1700 using set cpu at full overclock.
Sent from my Dell Streak using XDA App

dj steves 2.2 v1.4 with the OC kernel.
I have a screenshot on gadgetu.net.
Just did another and got 1884

Stock 1.6...got 683...no idea why.
rukcus said:
hahaha beat 606 on 1.6
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Oh yea, expect very low quadrant score with 1.6.

1542 on dj steves 1.1.1
894 on official 2.2
Sent from my Dell Streak using XDA App

1902!! Man, im still rising.

thanks to the stock 2.2 lag fix from smokku, scores went from mid 800's to top of the charts at 1411, setcpu at 1100mhz
cool!

How are you guys getting these scores? I have a stock Froyo 2.2 Streak (offical update) and I'm lucky to get 800 :-(

new personal best 1603
thanks to smokku tweak

I was getting around 1000-1100 on Steve's 1.3... I just installed his 1.4.5 and overclocked as high as it would go. I didn't close any programs, had wi-fi on, just as I'd normally be using my phone. It ran a 1639. Not bad!
I noticed the animations ran a lot faster. Heck, that score is tripled what I was running on 2.1.

Benchmark Tests on Legend 2.1 vs 2.2

Hi All,
Updated my missus's Legend to 2.2 today and ran a Quadrant Benchmark test on it..
best of 3 was 903 (avg is about 860)..
What are you getting on 2.1... and what sort of scores are you getting on the custom ROM's out there?
Post your scores stating which ROM you're running..

Clean Eclair, 2.1 = 4XX-5XX
Azure, 2.2 = 8XX-9XX
Cyanogenmod RC2, 2.2.1 = 8XX-9XX
Never benchmark a Sense ROM before so I cannot provide such information.

Best of 3 was 365 on unbranded 2.1 update 1
Sent from my HTC Legend using XDA App

Constantly above 1xxx with CM RC1/RC2 and OC787 kernel...but that's normal since it's overclocked
Sent from my Legend using XDA App

My result was 387 on 2.1 update 1 official Rom
Sent from my HTC Legend using XDA App

im_iceman said:
Hi All,
Updated my missus's Legend to 2.2 today and ran a Quadrant Benchmark test on it..
best of 3 was 903 (avg is about 860)..
What are you getting on 2.1... and what sort of scores are you getting on the custom ROM's out there?
Post your scores stating which ROM you're running..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using a normal 2.1 legend, benchmarked three times... 377, 332 and 361. Even more anxious to get froyo now then!

rajasyaitan said:
Azure, 2.2 = 4XX-5XX
Cyanogenmod RC2, 2.2.1 = 8XX-11XX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fixed....
Sense 2.1 was 3XX (4XX with OC)
However, even going from 3XX to 8XX (CM6.1) I did not see any speed improvements in games. OC DID improve the speed

Skardy said:
Fixed....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You cannot get 11XX without OC'ing.

rajasyaitan said:
You cannot get 11XX without OC'ing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right I forgot to specify

First run on rooted Sense Froyo was 915. Second run was 870. Third was 927.

rajasyaitan said:
Clean Eclair, 2.1 = 4XX-5XX
Azure, 2.2 = 8XX-9XX
Cyanogenmod RC2, 2.2.1 = 8XX-9XX
Never benchmark a Sense ROM before so I cannot provide such information.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry Sir, but are you ****ing-kidding-me? With almost stock 2.1 i had ~380. With azure 1.0.x now i have ~460.

I have not programmed anything in android yet, but I know programming java for some years and I think that I can tell you why those spectacular benchmarks doesn't apply in most games.
The improvements have been made in the dalvik virtual machine, which is responsible for executing the java code of the applications.
But if programmes want more performance, they can write part of the program directly in native code, developed in C or C++. This code cannot be optimized (more), thus applicacions using JNI massively don't see any improvement.
I suppose many games should be using JNI because of the advantages in performance, so they're already 'optimized'.
Please, correct me if I'm wrong
--Edu

no0neX said:
I'm sorry Sir, but are you ****ing-kidding-me? With almost stock 2.1 i had ~380. With azure 1.0.x now i have ~460.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry Sir, but are you a ****ing kid? Let me try to be as nice as possible here. Do your homework before you bash other people. Go to the respected ROM's thread, or the OC thread and look around for other peoples results. That is the average result. 4XX on Azure? Seriously? Throw your phone to the wall and maybe that'll boost the Quadrant scores.

I'm with you my friend. Some people are just ignorant.
rajasyaitan said:
I'm sorry Sir, but are you a ****ing kid? Let me try to be as nice as possible here. Do your homework before you bash other people. Go to the respected ROM's thread, or the OC thread and look around for other peoples results. That is the average result. 4XX on Azure? Seriously? Throw your phone to the wall and maybe that'll boost the Quadrant scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my Legend using XDA App

rajasyaitan said:
I'm sorry Sir, but are you a ****ing kid? Let me try to be as nice as possible here. Do your homework before you bash other people. Go to the respected ROM's thread, or the OC thread and look around for other peoples results. That is the average result. 4XX on Azure? Seriously? Throw your phone to the wall and maybe that'll boost the Quadrant scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Raja, the avarage Azure scores are 4XX because JIT is actually disabled in that rom, even though the option present and checked.

Skardy said:
Raja, the avarage Azure scores are 4XX because JIT is actually disabled in that rom, even though the option present and checked.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually it is enabled. I asked Ali about it before. But then again that was few months ago, I might be wrong.

rajasyaitan said:
Actually it is enabled. I asked Ali about it before. But then again that was few months ago, I might be wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry my bad.
Seems like JIT was disabled only until Azure 0.6.
However I can confirm that my Azure 1.0.1 quadrant score was 4XX (which is kind of low...), and as I now have 1095 with CM6.1 I don't think theres a problem with my legend's performance.

Sorry for the newbie question, but.. how do I run a Quadrant Benchmark ?
I know these numbers refer to the performance, and that the 2.2 scores a lot better, but in actual everyday usage - battery life, speed etc. what does this practically mean?

Skardy said:
Sorry my bad.
Seems like JIT was disabled only until Azure 0.6.
However I can confirm that my Azure 1.0.1 quadrant score was 4XX (which is kind of low...), and as I now have 1095 with CM6.1 I don't think theres a problem with my legend's performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No worries mate. Seriously? The last time I used Azure I got around 8XX. That was version 1.0 I think.
versifier said:
Sorry for the newbie question, but.. how do I run a Quadrant Benchmark ?
I know these numbers refer to the performance, and that the 2.2 scores a lot better, but in actual everyday usage - battery life, speed etc. what does this practically mean?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Install Quadrant and run it. Well, technically it is just numbers. But most of the benchmarkers do admit feeling the difference between lower and higher scores. Some say those are placebo effect, but meh. I don't buy that ****.

2.1 Stock
1st test
380
2nd test
381
3rd test
383
/T

Ways to improve Quadrant Score on Stock Froyo?

With Stock, my quadrant score was around 800+ something.
After rooting, disabling Telenav and few other non essential with Autostart then reboot, my score improved to 1041. Any other ways to tweak it to higher score? Voodoo (convert to ext4?)

My advice is to not care about your quadrant score. If your phone doesnt feel fast enough for you then install a lagfix and be done with it.

kobesabi said:
With Stock, my quadrant score was around 800+ something.
After rooting, disabling Telenav and few other non essential with Autostart then reboot, my score improved to 1041. Any other ways to tweak it to higher score? Voodoo (convert to ext4?)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
use a stock voodoo kernel.
you can thank me later.

scrizz said:
use a stock voodoo kernel.
you can thank me later.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im having the best experience with bionix v and Dow. My phone is now so snappy quick. Quadrant in the 2k+. And I've felt a increase in data speeds. I'm one to tether a lot.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

KA6 + voodoo - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=870480

quadrant score

hey guys, the quadrant score my rooted froyo i5801 is only a pathetic 289.... is there something wrong with my phone? any ways i can make it go higher?
thanks.

aeonstorm said:
hey guys, the quadrant score my rooted froyo i5801 is only a pathetic 289.... is there something wrong with my phone? any ways i can make it go higher?
thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes...You can check out lagfix and that bring the score to around 550 - 560

jaskiratsingh said:
Yes...You can check out lagfix and that bring the score to around 550 - 560
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats by the way do nothing... stay with your score, it doesnt matter anyway

I see thanks guys. haha because seeing the phone at the bottom of the ranking feels kinda crappy. how does the lagfix work? i read the threads but they seem to screw up the phone in certain ways
Sent from my GT-I5801 using XDA App

aeonstorm said:
I see thanks guys. haha because seeing the phone at the bottom of the ranking feels kinda crappy. how does the lagfix work? i read the threads but they seem to screw up the phone in certain ways
Sent from my GT-I5801 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's loads of "lag fixes" out there, designed to speed up the phone from perceived laginess. Some seem to do nothing more than inflate test score numbers (like Quadrant).
Do not worry about the score of one application. The true tests lie within the hands of the user. Are you happy with the phone? If not, then maybe it's time to upgrade to froyo, or a custom cooked ROM of Froyo.