Related
Hi All,
Updated my missus's Legend to 2.2 today and ran a Quadrant Benchmark test on it..
best of 3 was 903 (avg is about 860)..
What are you getting on 2.1... and what sort of scores are you getting on the custom ROM's out there?
Post your scores stating which ROM you're running..
Clean Eclair, 2.1 = 4XX-5XX
Azure, 2.2 = 8XX-9XX
Cyanogenmod RC2, 2.2.1 = 8XX-9XX
Never benchmark a Sense ROM before so I cannot provide such information.
Best of 3 was 365 on unbranded 2.1 update 1
Sent from my HTC Legend using XDA App
Constantly above 1xxx with CM RC1/RC2 and OC787 kernel...but that's normal since it's overclocked
Sent from my Legend using XDA App
My result was 387 on 2.1 update 1 official Rom
Sent from my HTC Legend using XDA App
im_iceman said:
Hi All,
Updated my missus's Legend to 2.2 today and ran a Quadrant Benchmark test on it..
best of 3 was 903 (avg is about 860)..
What are you getting on 2.1... and what sort of scores are you getting on the custom ROM's out there?
Post your scores stating which ROM you're running..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using a normal 2.1 legend, benchmarked three times... 377, 332 and 361. Even more anxious to get froyo now then!
rajasyaitan said:
Azure, 2.2 = 4XX-5XX
Cyanogenmod RC2, 2.2.1 = 8XX-11XX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fixed....
Sense 2.1 was 3XX (4XX with OC)
However, even going from 3XX to 8XX (CM6.1) I did not see any speed improvements in games. OC DID improve the speed
Skardy said:
Fixed....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You cannot get 11XX without OC'ing.
rajasyaitan said:
You cannot get 11XX without OC'ing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right I forgot to specify
First run on rooted Sense Froyo was 915. Second run was 870. Third was 927.
rajasyaitan said:
Clean Eclair, 2.1 = 4XX-5XX
Azure, 2.2 = 8XX-9XX
Cyanogenmod RC2, 2.2.1 = 8XX-9XX
Never benchmark a Sense ROM before so I cannot provide such information.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry Sir, but are you ****ing-kidding-me? With almost stock 2.1 i had ~380. With azure 1.0.x now i have ~460.
I have not programmed anything in android yet, but I know programming java for some years and I think that I can tell you why those spectacular benchmarks doesn't apply in most games.
The improvements have been made in the dalvik virtual machine, which is responsible for executing the java code of the applications.
But if programmes want more performance, they can write part of the program directly in native code, developed in C or C++. This code cannot be optimized (more), thus applicacions using JNI massively don't see any improvement.
I suppose many games should be using JNI because of the advantages in performance, so they're already 'optimized'.
Please, correct me if I'm wrong
--Edu
no0neX said:
I'm sorry Sir, but are you ****ing-kidding-me? With almost stock 2.1 i had ~380. With azure 1.0.x now i have ~460.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry Sir, but are you a ****ing kid? Let me try to be as nice as possible here. Do your homework before you bash other people. Go to the respected ROM's thread, or the OC thread and look around for other peoples results. That is the average result. 4XX on Azure? Seriously? Throw your phone to the wall and maybe that'll boost the Quadrant scores.
I'm with you my friend. Some people are just ignorant.
rajasyaitan said:
I'm sorry Sir, but are you a ****ing kid? Let me try to be as nice as possible here. Do your homework before you bash other people. Go to the respected ROM's thread, or the OC thread and look around for other peoples results. That is the average result. 4XX on Azure? Seriously? Throw your phone to the wall and maybe that'll boost the Quadrant scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my Legend using XDA App
rajasyaitan said:
I'm sorry Sir, but are you a ****ing kid? Let me try to be as nice as possible here. Do your homework before you bash other people. Go to the respected ROM's thread, or the OC thread and look around for other peoples results. That is the average result. 4XX on Azure? Seriously? Throw your phone to the wall and maybe that'll boost the Quadrant scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Raja, the avarage Azure scores are 4XX because JIT is actually disabled in that rom, even though the option present and checked.
Skardy said:
Raja, the avarage Azure scores are 4XX because JIT is actually disabled in that rom, even though the option present and checked.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually it is enabled. I asked Ali about it before. But then again that was few months ago, I might be wrong.
rajasyaitan said:
Actually it is enabled. I asked Ali about it before. But then again that was few months ago, I might be wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry my bad.
Seems like JIT was disabled only until Azure 0.6.
However I can confirm that my Azure 1.0.1 quadrant score was 4XX (which is kind of low...), and as I now have 1095 with CM6.1 I don't think theres a problem with my legend's performance.
Sorry for the newbie question, but.. how do I run a Quadrant Benchmark ?
I know these numbers refer to the performance, and that the 2.2 scores a lot better, but in actual everyday usage - battery life, speed etc. what does this practically mean?
Skardy said:
Sorry my bad.
Seems like JIT was disabled only until Azure 0.6.
However I can confirm that my Azure 1.0.1 quadrant score was 4XX (which is kind of low...), and as I now have 1095 with CM6.1 I don't think theres a problem with my legend's performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No worries mate. Seriously? The last time I used Azure I got around 8XX. That was version 1.0 I think.
versifier said:
Sorry for the newbie question, but.. how do I run a Quadrant Benchmark ?
I know these numbers refer to the performance, and that the 2.2 scores a lot better, but in actual everyday usage - battery life, speed etc. what does this practically mean?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Install Quadrant and run it. Well, technically it is just numbers. But most of the benchmarkers do admit feeling the difference between lower and higher scores. Some say those are placebo effect, but meh. I don't buy that ****.
2.1 Stock
1st test
380
2nd test
381
3rd test
383
/T
My wife got a shift on release day and i played with it all the time before I got mine yesterday. I was getting 1650 in quadrant on her shift 100% stock no temp or perm root nothing removed ... so yesterday I get my shift, root it right outta the box and kill apps and run quadrant and my highest score is 1340 did rooting it slow it down or did I get a lemon? I havend RUU'd but I factory reset a few times with the same result... on a weird note I know that some peoples phones weren't able to handle the full 1.5 OC but mine does fine and pulls 2275 in quadrant with miui...weird huh?
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
I had the same drop from about 1600 to 1300 after rooting it. I always knew when I ran visionary the performance was crap. Didn't really notice any slowness, just saw the numbers from quadrant.
I will check the wifes shift when she gets home (hers is rooted now too) and see if she has the same thing.
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
Mine went from 1500's to 1200's
Somethings not right
and I removed tons of bloatware, dont have much apps installed (much less than when I got 1500's)
d1msum4lyfe said:
Mine went from 1500's to 1200's
Somethings not right
and I removed tons of bloatware, dont have much apps installed (much less than when I got 1500's)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since rooting?
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
z4root doesn't seem to be much better. I'm temprooted with z4root and just got 1328. Prerooting I /think/ it was in the 1500 range.
Weird. I've also got a drop vs unrooted stock. With current Quadrent (1.7.1) I get in the 1300's. With previous version (1.5.1) I get 1400's. Out of the box I had 1500 - 1600.
^ Shift Faced
sigh..people still use quadrant? if you don't use pro version you can't tell what exactly is dropping or where the difference is..not to mention its flawed..
Try Smartbench 2010 and/or GLBenchmark
Can we just autodelete any posts that start with "sigh"? They never contribute to the conversation.
^ Shift Faced
I still get in the 1500-1600s perm rooted, usually capping out around 1645. Only thing I didn't do was install the recovery or flash any ROMs. Just froze the apps I didn't want to see in titanium. I also deleted Visionary but that's it. Everything else was the same as before I rooted. I never used my phone in temp root mode though. I went from stock to perm root without doing any performance tests.
I'm running miui oc 1.5g and my first couple tries were in the 2200s, downloaded the new version that just came out, played with it again this morning and I've been getting around 1900, I think the new version that came out may be causing it, version 1.1.7
whoever has an older version, can they pull the apk and let those who are getting 'lower scores' try it and see if the results are the same or not
jesusice said:
Can we just autodelete any posts that start with "sigh"? They never contribute to the conversation.
^ Shift Faced
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are you talking about? I contributed in saying that you can't base your assumptions on 1 benchmark..mostly a flawed one..in his case he lost "Quadrant Score" but Quadrant Score is vague as there is CPU, IO, 2D, 3D, Memory..
so there is n way to isolate the issue..unless you either use Quadrant Pro or another benchmark...because it can also be another Flaw in Quadrant too..if not you can figure out what exactly is being effected...
But you are right, we should autodelete posts that don't contribute to the discussion..like this guy:
jesusice said:
Can we just autodelete any posts that start with "sigh"? They never contribute to the conversation.
^ Shift Faced
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cpu is down a little. But I/O and 2D are down quite a bit from when I was running the stock rom, both around half. I'm kind of curious why that is. I'm wondering if its because now I'm on the Deodexed rom and not stock maybe? On a side note I was able to get 2517 on the 1.5ghz OC kernel and Desire ROM though.
Some people know it all I guess
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
gTen said:
What are you talking about? I contributed in saying that you can't base your assumptions on 1 benchmark..mostly a flawed one..in his case he lost "Quadrant Score" but Quadrant Score is vague as there is CPU, IO, 2D, 3D, Memory..
so there is n way to isolate the issue..unless you either use Quadrant Pro or another benchmark...because it can also be another Flaw in Quadrant too..if not you can figure out what exactly is being effected...
But you are right, we should autodelete posts that don't contribute to the discussion..like this guy:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Running the same benchmark on the same phone will tell you something, though. It may not tell you exactly where, but something is suffering.
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
I noticed that when I updated quadrant today, my score dropped from around a 1600 to between 1300 and 1400.
I have a Vibrant rooted running the Team Whiskey Bionix-v1.2.1 ROM. I have a few apps that I use daily, but the only one I know does any major damage to speed is beautiful widgets. I don't use any live backgrounds. I scored a 1536 on a benchmark test from Quadrant Standard.
Do you guys know of ways to better these scores?
Use AutoKiller Memory Optimizer
Unless your phone actually feels sluggish I wouldnt worry about quadrant scores. If it is sluggish try installing Voodoo or one of the Universal Lagfix in the developers section.
regP said:
Unless your phone actually feels sluggish I wouldnt worry about quadrant scores. If it is sluggish try installing Voodoo or one of the Universal Lagfix in the developers section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With a 1500+ quadrant he's already running Voodoo...
I do agree that unless the phone is feeling slow to not worry about it. Quadrant is pretty easy to fudge over 2k even though the phone isn't any faster.
Didn't wana assume lol..
Haha yes I have voodoo, bionix-v1.2.1 comes with it preset. Appreciate the help.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
actually, if you going for score some of the older J-rom series with over clock really scored high........ But with the current setup, you typically have 11-15 or so things that are open and TSR, if you remove alot of those to make it a vanilla barebones, then o.c it...... you can improve the score........ BUT speed scores are not worth much other than bragging rights.......... Like everyone else said if your phone is performing well then,..........who cares about the scores
Yea I'm just trying to see if there are things I can do to make it perform even better than it already is
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Andrew.Dodson07 said:
Yea I'm just trying to see if there are things I can do to make it perform even better than it already is
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What areas is the phone lacking performance for you?
Andrew.Dodson07 said:
Yea I'm just trying to see if there are things I can do to make it perform even better than it already is
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go look up the Dragon 3.6 Kernel in the Dev section. You can overclock the phone a little or a lot depending how much it can handle. I'm running 1.2ghz at the moment.
regP said:
What areas is the phone lacking performance for you?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It really isn't particularly lacking in any way that I can tell. But i remember thinking that same thing back when i had AOL dial up haha. I'm impressed with the phones ability now, i just want to know if this is as good as it gets
Andrew.Dodson07 said:
It really isn't particularly lacking in any way that I can tell. But i remember thinking that same thing back when i had AOL dial up haha. I'm impressed with the phones ability now, i just want to know if this is as good as it gets
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock 2.2.1 is the fastest/smoothest ROM I've used on this phone ever and it hasn't even been optimized. I also downloaded the Dragon Kernel v3.6 and overclocked it to 1.28Ghz and its very stable. I always use my friends iPhone 4 to compare speeds and with the current setup I have now their isn't any difference in speed.
Stock I9100G Quadrant Scored beat stock I9100's Score! i think it will get more score than mod i9100 once have mod with kernel oc to higher clock speed! so OMAP is powerful than Exynos
My I9100G scored 4171
The picture redirects to another picture. If you want to do sth, do it correctly... ffs What's the number? I've scored 4004 on stock i9100...
update already.. sorry for the mistake image link.. i score at 4171 at stock i9100G!
updated already.. sorry for the mistaked image link.. i score at 4171 at stock i9100G!
Quadrant score means nothing. It means less then incorrectly posted pic and double posts.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
MS. said:
Quadrant score means nothing. It means less then incorrectly posted pic and double posts.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, that is cause i am not familiar to make posting... i can swear that is 100% real! Or you not satisfied that your i9100 lose? i can make a video if you want to see...
well my i9100 is cleverer than you. i think you didn't get it. quadrant sucks and nobody cares about quadrant scores.
rauschkugl said:
well my i9100 is cleverer than you. i think you didn't get it. quadrant sucks and nobody cares about quadrant scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you saying stupid? then you how to measure the performance on one phone... you think u is god can measure yourself? Please be manner while using your word.. TQ
well then don't spam the forum with stupid threads. quadrant wasn't updated for ages, it's not meant for testing dualcore chips and you always get completely different scores when running it different times. only noobs care about quadrant scores.
All stock so you are noob?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
donmarkon said:
All stock so you are noob?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
your one already modded bro... see your battery icon also know... =.=
Can I be noob too?
rauschkugl said:
well then don't spam the forum with stupid threads. quadrant wasn't updated for ages, it's not meant for testing dualcore chips and you always get completely different scores when running it different times. only noobs care about quadrant scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, i know that is different score on Quadrant... but let say why old Android phone like one year ago Xperia x10 always got lower score than samsung s2? tat y in fact samsung S2 is powerful than before phone... If you think this is Stupid thread, why not you just ignore and keep your mouth shut.. and please be manner while using word... what the religion you have? so rude are you!
TheSaw said:
Can I be noob too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you hiding a meaning behind?
i was able to score more than 4000 points with my old hd2. and the builds in that time weren't even running stable. so my old hd2 is as good as your s2?
rauschkugl said:
i was able to score more than 4000 points with my old hd2. and the builds in that time weren't even running stable. so my old hd2 is as good as your s2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, please provide your Evidence brother thank you because be manner
these were the first builds that were running from sd card. i don't have these versions anymore because they were not stable and lot of things didn't work and i don't have my hd2 anymore. this should just show you that quadrant isn't reliable. the gpu isn't tested at all.
and who the hell does care about stock settings on xda? nobody here has a stock phone. antutu or smartbench if you care about numbers. they're at least able to test dualcore cpus. but a higher score still doesn't mean that your phone is better.
rauschkugl said:
these were the first builds that were running from sd card. i don't have these versions anymore because they were not stable and lot of things didn't work and i don't have my hd2 anymore. this should just show you that quadrant isn't reliable. the gpu isn't tested at all.
and who the hell does care about stock settings on xda? nobody here has a stock phone. antutu or smartbench if you care about numbers. they're at least able to test dualcore cpus. but a higher score still doesn't mean that your phone is better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
okok. Bro.. so, do you plan to move to Galaxy Note? or waiting New Galaxy S3?
serge327 said:
No, that is cause i am not familiar to make posting... i can swear that is 100% real! Or you not satisfied that your i9100 lose? i can make a video if you want to see...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hope your happy with your dev community
Sent from my GT-I9100
serge327 said:
Stock I9100G Quadrant Scored beat stock I9100's Score! i think it will get more score than mod i9100 once have mod with kernel oc to higher clock speed! so OMAP is powerful than Exynos
My I9100G scored 4171
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
first of all, you are using a wrong benchmark to test. secondly, you are not comparing apple to apple. what i meant was your G version is most likely running on update3 source code. when i flash a kernel with update3 source code, my stock rom is able to hit more than 4300+
Hi all,
I wonder how is it possible that there are such differences between units. I mean I have never managed to reach more than 31500, and I see that some people, usually reach 35000+.
How is it possible ?
moulip said:
Hi all,
I wonder how is it possible that there are such differences between units. I mean I have never managed to reach more than 31500, and I see that some people, usually reach 35000+.
How is it possible ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got 22,941
Here is mine stock
Sent from my LG-LS980 using xda premium
I don't know about everyone else, but I get better benchmarks running stock odexed vs deodexed roms.
moulip said:
Hi all,
I wonder how is it possible that there are such differences between units. I mean I have never managed to reach more than 31500, and I see that some people, usually reach 35000+.
How is it possible ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Download trickster mod from playstore, change your governor to Performance. Put your phone in the freezer for about 10 mins, then run your Antutu test...you should get 35k+. My average score is 36k+ with a high of 37.6k. Im on pure stock with a few Xposed tweaks.
mistermidas said:
Download trickster mod from playstore, change your governor to Performance. Put your phone in the freezer for about 10 mins, then run your Antutu test...you should get 35k+. My average score is 36k+ with a high of 37.6k. Im on pure stock with a few Xposed tweaks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I assume that could be a good trick, except that you have to be root and I don't want that. Plus, I am sure that people who get such high scores, are mostly full stock. That's why I wonder.
mchlbenner said:
Here is mine stock
Sent from my LG-LS980 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here it is how is it possible ? Really I don't see. Do you get this each time you run a benchmark ?
Maybe it is related to the fact that your phone is not the same as mine (I own a D802 from France) ?
just ran it on my stock rooted. 33.7k
Here is mine, stock and unrooted.
Sent from my LG-LS980
moulip said:
I assume that could be a good trick, except that you have to be root and I don't want that. Plus, I am sure that people who get such high scores, are mostly full stock. That's why I wonder.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you consider full stock? Because Im full stock just rooted. Also before I even rooted my phone I was able to get 35k+ just from the freezer trick.
mistermidas said:
What do you consider full stock? Because Im full stock just rooted. Also before I even rooted my phone I was able to get 35k+ just from the freezer trick.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Full-stock meant without anything non-genuine. Root included. Or with root but without any tweaks. Because, I don't see why being root could improve the results. Except if Antutu is able to alter the governor settings, while running ...
But from what you tell me, how can you get these scores and not me ?
Totally stock with no tricks involved.
34324 in Antutu.
That's after 1,30h of web browsing....
All your benchmarks just confirm the fact that I don't understand such differences. The only difference I see, is that this is not the same models than mine.
moulip said:
Full-stock meant without anything non-genuine. Root included. Or with root but without any tweaks. Because, I don't see why being root could improve the results. Except if Antutu is able to alter the governor settings, while running ...
But from what you tell me, how can you get these scores and not me ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like I said, I still scored 35k+ with just the freezer trick before I even rooted my phone. Just out of curiousity to see what a pure stock score what be. Only differences I see that would make a difference are the Carrier model. I have Sprint LS980 by the way.
mistermidas said:
Like I said, I still scored 35k+ with just the freezer trick before I even rooted my phone. Just out of curiousity to see what a pure stock score what be. Only differences I see that would make a difference are the Carrier model. I have Sprint LS980 by the way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes that's what I think.
How much do you get in Quadrant ? Mine is 21k+
moulip said:
Yes that's what I think.
How much do you get in Quadrant ? Mine is 21k+
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My Quadrant is around 20k ish, but I only ran it a couple times. I dont really put much stock in Quadrant since it hasnt been updated in forever.
For all the people complaining about bad scores, make sure your phone is completely cool before doing a benchmark. If you don't you'll get thermal throttling and you will get lower results.
crzykiller said:
For all the people complaining about bad scores, make sure your phone is completely cool before doing a benchmark. If you don't you'll get thermal throttling and you will get lower results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Beat me to it
crzykiller said:
For all the people complaining about bad scores, make sure your phone is completely cool before doing a benchmark. If you don't you'll get thermal throttling and you will get lower results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True that. But I have tested at different times, when it was empty or just reset to factory. I still get the same results. And by the way I have disabled thermal throttling.