Related
Is there any working lag fix apps for Epic? I tried using Ryans OCLF but it seems to only work for Vibrant. I get an error saying not enough memory available in /data.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
From everything I have read, we don't need it.
I was reading about it and got the impression its for all Galaxy S phones. My friend ran it on his Vibrant and his Quadrant score went from 1022 to 2234. Its definitely a lot faster than my Epic. I'm scoring 1013.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
There is no lag fix for the Epic as it does not have any lag. Period. The Vibrant needed it because of some file system slowdowns due to Samsung's fault.
Thanks for the reply. But my only question about that is if we're all part of the Galaxy S family, how come the Vibrant can reach scores in the 2000s and we're stuck in the 1000's?lol
Sent from my asshole because my phones the ****!
BBlunts456 said:
Thanks for the reply. But my only question about that is if we're all part of the Galaxy S family, how come the Vibrant can reach scores in the 2000s and we're stuck in the 1000's?lol
Sent from my asshole because my phones the ****!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It messes with the file system in a way that fools Quadrant into scoring higher. It's not actually faster though. If anything, the Epic is faster in real world performance.
LordLugard said:
There is no lag fix for the Epic as it does not have any lag. Period. The Vibrant needed it because of some file system slowdowns due to Samsung's fault.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think that anyone has noticed any sudden slowdowns - with the latest bugfix, this phone seems to have the fewest software issues of all the Galaxy S phones.
I can't wait for 2.2 - this phone will fly with it!;-)
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
BBlunts456 said:
Thanks for the reply. But my only question about that is if we're all part of the Galaxy S family, how come the Vibrant can reach scores in the 2000s and we're stuck in the 1000's?lol
Sent from my asshole because my phones the ****!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That lagfix fools Quadrant on the I/O score. It's a fake higher score.
When running Quadrant Standard I get a "Internal error during benchmark resolution" Then when I click to send my scores to the internet, it tells me the service call failed. Does anyone know of a fix?
Are u connected to the net? You have to be connected.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA Premium App
captain134 said:
Are u connected to the net? You have to be connected.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, very much so connected to the net haha
I've been having the same problem after changing to .ext4 with modified kernel.
Jorge787 said:
I've been having the same problem after changing to .ext4 with modified kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I notice people saying they're getting such and such score with an EXT4 kernel, but I don't know how they get the app to work
Stevenjcarney said:
I notice people saying they're getting such and such score with an EXT4 kernel, but I don't know how they get the app to work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I usually get that error when i run the app in landscape.
But closing and redoing usually fixs it for me.
I never thought about that. I'm trying it now. Thanks!
FYI, as benchmarks go, Quadrant is *worthless*.
Regards,
Dave
foxmeister said:
FYI, as benchmarks go, Quadrant is *worthless*.
Regards,
Dave
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you recommend, then?
Versii2 said:
What do you recommend, then?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On Android, nothing at all, beyond actual subjective experience.
IMO, there are no synthetic benchmarks for Android that actually give a true indication of a devices performance. Quadrant is a prime example of this - according to Quadrant, prior to upgrading to EXT4, my HTC Desire and my HTC Desire HD were both *way* faster than my Tab, yet my own actual subjective experience with the Tab suggests that they are all roughly similar in day to day usage.
"Lagfix" a Tab via OCLF, and according to Quadrant it is much faster than a Tab that has been converted to EXT4, yet from my personal experiences I know that in real world usage this is not the case,and indeed it isn't much faster than an RFS Tab.
Quadrant *massively* overrates IO - so much so, it renders the entire benchmark a waste of time.
Regards,
Dave
The newest Qualcomm mobile web bench Vellamo, I'd say something new to try, I got 640 on 1.8.3 (froyo)
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
I got 945 on my Galaxy Tab 10.1
Got 722 in GB
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
This benchmark is crap and inaccurate.
Just stick to sunspider and browsermark.
I got 610 on 1.8.3. Its shame that samsung's tab carries the same core and ram, and still navigates much, much better, even if you disconsider this benchmark.
KingKuba13 said:
This benchmark is crap and inaccurate.
Just stick to sunspider and browsermark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why is that?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Because our phone failed in this test while SGS2 scores 940~
ofek said:
Because our phone failed in this test while SGS2 scores 940~
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you ever used an GS2 and an Atrix side by side? I love our phone man, but there's a reason why the GS2 is 20% more expensive on some countries than the Atrix with it's packed-to-full box and the lapdock together.
slimslim said:
Why is that?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go to the specific sunspider javascript test with it, which you can score 2200-4000 ms, meanwhile HTC sensation does 6000ms. Lower is better, btw.
The benchmark will still give you a lower score for it compared to the sensation.
So if all these phones are beating Atrix in sunspider/javascript they should be getting scores in the 1000-3000ms easily right......LOL
Great job Qualcomm, you are beyond a joke again. Trying to make your little turds Evo3d/Sensation look a little less pathetic when they get crushed in real web benchmarks.
KingKuba13 said:
Go to the specific sunspider javascript test with it, which you can score 2200-4000 ms, meanwhile HTC sensation does 6000ms. Lower is better, btw.
The benchmark will still give you a lower score for it compared to the sensation.
So if all these phones are beating Atrix in sunspider/javascript they should be getting scores in the 1000-3000ms easily right......LOL
Great job Qualcomm, you are beyond a joke again. Trying to make your little turds Evo3d/Sensation look a little less pathetic when they get crushed in real web benchmarks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try using cf bench from the market. My evo3d smacks my atrix.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
inoskedu8o8 said:
Try using cf bench from the market. My evo3d smacks my atrix.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try using smart bench from the market....
Is your evo3d running @1.8ghz, doubt it beats Atrix with GB.
Evo smacks nothing.
Looks like LG 2x with custom roms is killing this benchmark. 2000 +
KingKuba13 said:
Try using smart bench from the market....
Is your evo3d running @1.8ghz, doubt it beats Atrix with GB.
Evo smacks nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it's running stock. It does beat atrix with cf bench. Atrix beats it with quadrant though. Guys in the evo3d forum that are overclocked at 1.5 are smacking the sgs2 with cf bench. What does this mean in real world performance? Absolutely nothing. C'mon man I thought you knew.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
I have an Atrix 4G and managed to get 4708 with Quadrant.
good idea, but without OS informations it is bit worthless. pls update. thx
KulDrive said:
I have an Atrix 4G and managed to get 4708 with Quadrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your post is already flawed since quadrant doesn't have good support for dual core... accuracy may be off. Try ChainFire.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
http://forum.xda-developers.com/search.php?searchid=93702893
Not with what I did to it did multiple tests and all where around 4500-4700
No quadrant doesn't use both cores use newer bench
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
KulDrive said:
Not with what I did to it did multiple tests and all where around 4500-4700
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
unless you re-wrote the APK to support both cores, then you're gonna be better off using either Antutu or CF Bench.
Besides Quadrant not testing both cores, who wants to compare thier phone to the 2009 lineup? Time to upgrade your benchmarking app. I dont need an app to know the Atrix is better than the OGdroid. Quadrant sucks!
WiredPirate said:
Besides Quadrant not testing both cores, who wants to compare thier phone to the 2009 lineup? Time to upgrade your benchmarking app. I dont need an app to know the Atrix is better than the OGdroid. Quadrant sucks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
testing antutu one moment please
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
i dont see how the new samsung is better though
it seems to hang when doing the sd read and write im prolly loseing a few points because of my generic sd card
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
oh here is a test with cf bench
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
ltdanno360 said:
oh here is a test with cf bench View attachment 741213
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here's my CF Bench (taken on CM7 Pre-beta 2; haven't had a reason to do another one since then)
Running CM7 Beta, Overclocked to 1.3Ghz.
halfgingghost said:
Running CM7 Beta, Overclocked to 1.3Ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow scores like this that beet the sgs2
make me want to flash cm7 stat! only one thing keeps me from it ; my custom webtop; )
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
cm7 faux2.0 oc1.3
freshbakd said:
cm7 faux2.0 oc1.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1g ram free? How? I only have 893
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Man, just started a similar thread without knowing that this thread was created.
Kinda changed it though into a competition style; I think some people in here may want to post in my thread as well as some people are getting seriously high benchmarks!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1294749
Man...I was surprised to see the SGS2 is just as fast stock as mine is OC'd and deblurred.
Aura
Homebase in my sig...
Phoneguy589 said:
Man...I was surprised to see the SGS2 is just as fast stock as mine is OC'd and deblurred.
Aura
Homebase in my sig...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea hopfully we can get some kinda superkernal 2.5oc to blow sg2 out of the water but i think our phones might blowup first; )
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
He Guys,
The day has come, Android 4.0.3 aka Ice Cream Sandwich (ICS) has come to our loved tablets! But is there really a big performance boost where everyone was talking about? Lets find out!
NOTE:
Just did a retest and I it scored 2426!
Tedr44 had made a nice POST with good battery info and GPS info! check it out.
ps. it's my first kinda "review" video so be gentle
Dunno whats up with your device but i got around 2500 on 2 successive tests.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
Cool to see the benchmark improvement. Thanks for doing this. Hope to upgrade as soon as I go home.
PS: enjoyed the softcore porn music in the video
gkillerx said:
He Guys,
The day has come, Android 4.0.3 aka Ice Cream Sandwich (ICS) has come to our loved tablets! But is there really a big performance boost where everyone was talking about? Lets find out!
ps. it's my first kinda "review" video so be gentle
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just have to LOL at the elevator music
MarkyG82 said:
Dunno whats up with your device but i got around 2500 on 2 successive tests.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And you are on stock ? No CMW or root what so ever?
I will do a retest 3 times to see if I get the same scores...
El Niche said:
Cool to see the benchmark improvement. Thanks for doing this. Hope to upgrade as soon as I go home.
PS: enjoyed the softcore porn music in the video
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks man! haha I just wanted to add some cooldown/lounch music!
luna_c666 said:
I just have to LOL at the elevator music
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Elevator music? haha well glad you had a laugh at it ! Still hope it was usefull for you
Pulled 4948. Which is down from 7181 that I had when OC'd.
Edit: I'm using Antutu.
gkillerx said:
And you are on stock ? No CMW or root what so ever?
I will do a retest 3 times to see if I get the same scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes cwm, root, but no mods.
Sent from my HTC Vision using xda premium
5070 myself on antutu, forced gpu rendering, and 4 back process max. All other options stock
MarkyG82 said:
Yes cwm, root, but no mods.
Sent from my HTC Vision using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is odd... only think I hadn't was root and cwm
kingofyo1 said:
5070 myself on antutu, forced gpu rendering, and 4 back process max. All other options stock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did a test with forced gpu and it was a little better, not much. What do you mean with 4 back process max?
My Quadrant score from my rooted Transformer with bloat removed. So awesome!
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk
luna_c666 said:
I just have to LOL at the elevator music
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol elevator music .... I was waiting for an old school porn scene to come on or something lol
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
My Antutu score, again on stock, rooted, and debloated.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk
gkillerx said:
That is odd... only think I hadn't was root and cwm
Did a test with forced gpu and it was a little better, not much. What do you mean with 4 back process max?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in developer options, check out the background process limit. I set mine at 4 for that test. Basically it kills processes that are running in background once it reaches the user set limit
5440 1st test and 5512 2nd test with AnTuTu. Coming from Revolver with dalvik and cache wiped. Satisfied. ICS really runs great. Can't wait for custom roms.
ICS Kernel ?
Can anyone tell me what is the number of the new ics on their devices ? I have installed the ww version and it says
2.6.39.4-00002-g2977a0d
[email protected]#1
Can anyone confirm this please . Thanks .
hanybv said:
Can anyone tell me what is the number of the new ics on their devices ? I have installed the ww version and it says
2.6.39.4-00002-g2977a0d
[email protected]#1
Can anyone confirm this please . Thanks .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the same number on my WW.
I installed daoist's WW ICS Rom
I didn't bother to test extensively, but I did wipe my tablet and do the SunSpider Javascript Benchmark before upgrading, then wiped a second time and did SunSpider again after upgrading.
The result? I got a slightly worse score for ICS, but only negligibly so (and it was within the margin of error for both the before and after tests, hence realistically there was absolutely no difference.)
But that's for one single metric: stock browser javascript speed.
comparing two ICS units im getting:
Quadrant
TF - 2420
Nexus - 3005 (but with custom ROM/Kernel - but no overclocking/undervolting)
Antutu
TF - 4992
Nexus - 6289
very different machines I know but the Nexus scores shown are way above 'stock' nexus so id expect to see some serious tweaking boost the TF nicely too
.... but to be fair we all know such stats are fairly meaningless ....
Completely stock ICS on my Transformer, and I was getting between 2400-2600 benchmarks in Quadrant.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
Just did a retest and I got 2426! With all my programs installed etc. So i gues it was still setteling in at the time of recording
If you guys want more ICS video's just ask!