Hello guys, just wanted to share my results with you: (Average after 5 runs)
JM2: 2576
JP2: 1455
JP3: 1503
Arkymedes said:
Hello guys, just wanted to share my results with you:
JM2: 2576
JP2: 1455
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you share some more info with us?
How did you achieve these numbers?
Impressing. I guess we have to live with the fact that JP2 is faster. Hope it isn't too buggy then..
ivas75 said:
Could you share some more info with us?
How did you achieve these numbers?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think there is nothing much to share I guess.
I just flashed the ROM, start Benchmark PI from Market and posted the scores.
The Froyo build, even alpha the way it is already makes the difference. And quite a difference.
Edited first post
JP2 samset 2.0 - 1302
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
have you tried running it with "Linpack mark"
that is what most people use to test the smartphones speed, rather than the one you are using
i think both are good
Related
I've been using rustom ROM's since the first one came out.
Unfortunately in some ROM-topics people are talking about JIT.
Can please somebody explain what JIT means, what would be the added value of it and what it actually does?
Thanks in advance!
podb
JIT on Wikipedia... go have a look... it won't bite you...
just-in-time compilation (JIT), also known as dynamic translation, is a technique for improving the runtime performance .. basically it will speed up your mobile .. for more information Wiki
Thanks for the understandable explanation!
I tried to find more info on JIT but since I had no clue what it was about, I didn't know the explanation was the one I was looking for ...
So, thanks again!
so how do you install it/enable it? is it built into roms?
archie winnington-ingram said:
so how do you install it/enable it? is it built into roms?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You install it on top of a ROM, usually provided by the maker or someone else who made a package.
it's a little update.zip that replaces a few files.
So would it be on a "3 Branded" Hero? - if not is it as simple as loading a file?
Geesss nuts'n'bolts I find Win Mo soooo mush easier
anon2122 said:
You install it on top of a ROM, usually provided by the maker or someone else who made a package.
it's a little update.zip that replaces a few files.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well i'm using your rom. so i'll just sit back and be patient for the .zip file.
i think i read somewhere that you got 4.8 linpack using the beta version?
archie winnington-ingram said:
well i'm using your rom. so i'll just sit back and be patient for the .zip file.
i think i read somewhere that you got 4.8 linpack using the beta version?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am getting that kind of score on Super2 just now.
I'll get someone else to test it before release though
I'll test it. Pm me. Xxx
how come he's getting 4.5+ and your getting 3.0 (in your signature, or please update it!)??
I'm not using the jit yet...
So, any difference in real life? I didn't notice any speed improvement at all (as commented on VillainROM forum)
i have started using jit and i am now getting a much higher linpack score.
i havent noticed much of a difference in the speed, but it is smoother and more responsive.
however jit does cause some problems, making the phone a little jumpy for example, and a little less stable. worth it though imho.
Hey guys, this quick vid is a rundown on CM 6 on the Mytouch 3G Slide along with Overlock. I do not take credit for the ROM, Kernal, or Overclock profiles.
PART 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxwCsxh2zgw
PART 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJ8sZeNdFig
*CM6 for Mytouch Slide : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=755118
*Dumfuq's OverClock Kernal : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=745805
Note: I used the 806 kernal, not the version 1,2 or 3.
*And TJD319's post on his overclock profile : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=7783531&postcount=5
Very Big thanks to all those guys, CM team, Dumfuq, TJD319 and XDA forums.
This is not a tutorial, links provided are just a source to view. Any questions feel free to ask, I will try to answer as best as I can. Thank you.
You know what, compared to the other moron's who have posted today you are genius.
Wrong section but it's nice to see Android videos being made again,
Yeah i honestly didnt know what section it was. Now i know, thanks for the heads up.
little fyi for froyo users who like to brag about quad scores...
fenix 1.7.1 + oc (any version) = stable 2.2 rom with great scores with quad and linpack.
just fyi
Yeah i havent tried out Team Fenix's build, i wanna check it out sometime.
Awesome, thanks for uploading this. I've been looking for a video like this for a while.
No prob, hope it does help.
Fenix is the best right now with everything working
slide teamfenix v1.7 oc v3
javolin13 said:
little fyi for froyo users who like to brag about quad scores...
fenix 1.7.1 + oc (any version) = stable 2.2 rom with great scores with quad and linpack.
just fyi
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and where would i find this team phoenix?
zavien said:
and where would i find this team phoenix?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
srry fenix
Wow, that was a bit of a bump, eh?
You're probably gonna have to use the search function on this one.
How'd you dig this up anyways? And as an afterthought, I probably should have just let this sink back down.
3085 3317 3431 3212 2998
5 tries
tried 1 vellamo, score (1082)
(cant post pics yet)
Seriousley..... Sigh.....
and now? what is the reason your post this?
Wow. Lets stop caring about benchmarks, shall we?
Quadrant <3
Sent from my Galaxy S II using Tapatalk
And the point in this thread is what exactly?
First test.
Guantanamo86 said:
and now? what is the reason your post this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
neo6776 said:
And the point in this thread is what exactly?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to bother with the ICS Beta for day to day use.... I'm only guessing
No matter what the benchmark say, the latest CM9 is smoother than hot butter.
Could you please at least mention what firmware version you're referring to? Android 4.0.x is NOT relevant since benchmark result are mainly tied to driver performance, and that is outside of Android releases. So if there shall be any point at all with this thread, then please talk about KP1, KP2, KP4, KP8 etc.
tjtj4444 said:
Could you please at least mention what firmware version you're referring to? Android 4.0.x is NOT relevant since benchmark result are mainly tied to driver performance, and that is outside of Android releases. So if there shall be any point at all with this thread, then please talk about KP1, KP2, KP4, KP8 etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
or could we just accept quadrant scores are pointless, agree everyones e-penis is bigger than everyone elses and maybe just move on.
The only real purpose of Quandrant scores is to test your particular device from ROM-to-ROM. Comparing scores with other people has no real function and has been proven to be easily gamed.
Thread Closed.
I had nothing to do all day at work so I thought it might keep me busy flashing my transformer with all current ICS builds and then running quadrant benchmark. Well, it passed the time anyway.I didn't do any tweaking at all. I just flashed, booted and then ran these benchmarks. Here are the scores if you're interested.
Team EOS nightly build 7
1st score 2604
2nd score 2600
3rd score 2662
average score 2662
Revolution 3.0.1
1st score 2007
2nd score 1984
3rd score 1975
average score 1989
Code Named Android 1.5.0
1st score 2235
2nd score 2372
3rd score 2314
average score 2307
Revolver 4.0.0 Beta 1.3.1
1st score 2396
2nd score 2372
3rd score 2372
average score 2380
CM9 with Cornerstone
1st score 2303
2nd score 2552
3rd score 2465
average score 2440
Spark 20120219
1st score 1854
2nd score 1872
3rd score 1920
average score 1882
Thanks.
What I love about this place is that every question I'm about to ask has already been answered by some enterprising person on here.
But yet you didn't even hit his thanks button.
Thanks are about as important as Quadrant scores but after a post like that it kind of made me laugh a bit.
Can you bench the official CM9 lastest nightly?
Thanks
Thanks are about as important as Quadrant scores but after a post like that it kind of made me laugh a bit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I agree. There are lots of things not considered here such as kernel and cpu clock speeds and such. I was just bored and thought someone out there might find it interesting to see some "out-of-the-box" (so to speak) scores.
Can you bench the official CM9 lastest nightly?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, give me a link and I'll give it a whirl.
That wasn't meant for you. I appreciate your initiative in all that entail flashing all these ROMs. It was more for the guy above me showing his undying gratitiude for your efforts, but didn't even have the courtesy to hit your thanks.
Might also want to put a Stock scrore in there too. Just so someone who isn't rooted knows how their stock ROMs compete against custom ROMs. Noobs love Quadrant scores.
great info
Nice job sort of data that is use full to us people to lazy / busy to try out each rom
+1 for stock score
tryfarming said:
Nice job sort of data that is use full to us people to lazy / busy to try out each rom
+1 for stock score
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 for stock too. Thanks!
tryfarming said:
Nice job sort of data that is use full to us people to lazy / busy to try out each rom
+1 for stock score
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I made a video about this:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1514962
Kafluke said:
Yeah I agree. There are lots of things not considered here such as kernel and cpu clock speeds and such. I was just bored and thought someone out there might find it interesting to see some "out-of-the-box" (so to speak) scores.
Sure, give me a link and I'll give it a whirl.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right here. http://download.cyanogenmod.com/?device=tf101
thanks man!
try Codename android with tweak activated and reboot
Thanks! and please do it for other new ROM that coming
Do this one next:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1542302
Team EOS nightly build 7
1st score 2604
2nd score 2600
3rd score 2662
average score 2662
???
Why average is so big?
Woodrube said:
, but didn't even have the courtesy to hit your thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
People nagging about not using the Thanks button is just about the lamest thing here on xda.... Even more lamer is people begging for Thanks in their signatures.
Thanks.
What I love about this place is that every question I'm about to ask has already been answered by some enterprising person on here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Woodrube said:
Thanks are about as important as Quadrant scores but after a post like that it kind of made me laugh a bit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Woodrube said:
It was more for the guy above me showing his undying gratitiude for your efforts, but didn't even have the courtesy to hit your thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Martijn1971 said:
People nagging about not using the Thanks button is just about the lamest thing here on xda.... Even more lamer is people begging for Thanks in their signatures.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wasn't a nag, it was just kind of funny that he expounded so much for OPs efforts but didn't even hit his thanks button. It is about courtesy not numbers.
And I agree about the solicitation of thanks in the signature. When I first came to XDA, I did it but realized that I could actually put something useful in my sig instead.
It's nice, but the best 3D power i have in Codename Android v1.5.0
Martijn1971 said:
People nagging about not using the Thanks button is just about the lamest thing here on xda.... Even more lamer is people begging for Thanks in their signatures.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree.. You get a thanks for that..
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk
Team EOS Cornerstone Build 4
Test 1: 2602
Test 2: 2811
Test 3: 2812
Test 4: 2808
Average Score: 2758
Stock one for compare if it helps, completely stock with OTA ics
Test 1 - 2342
Test 2 - 2428
Test 3 - 2488
Test 4 - 2470
Average - 2432
I did receive some emails during the test, didnt reboot or anything before hand.
So it looks like from the post above mine the team EOS rom is "about" 13.5% faster.
Decent performance increase.
Hey guys!
In Samsung Galaxy S forum i found something veeeeeeeeeery interesting!
It's about the Linaro-Code that should speed up Android about a noticeable amount!
Just take a look at this video:
Linaro-Video from Youtube
(This is the related article: cnx-software.com)
Idk what i should think about it. If it really works, i guess it would be worth a try ?!
Here is another article, which says, that it can speed up Android 2 times!
"The Linaro team, who’s constantly working on optimizing software for the ARM
architecture, has worked on optimizing the latest version of Android as well, and
they claim up to 2x improvement in performance compared to stock Android
4.0.4, running on the same TI OMAP 4430 hardware. The improvements are
mostly CPU-related, even though they are showing a graphical object to test the
performance. They’ve managed to double the FPS for this particular test, but
they’ve also managed to increase the Sunspider performance by 30%, which is
also quite a big deal."
- quote from this article.
Some one has already posted bout this and its incompatible with our kernel
Sent from my GT-I5800 using XDA
There are there posts in this section
The original started by Persian sphinx and this has already been discuss by hillbeast in his thread
Why isn't any one searching for similar threads
Sent from my superphone using superswift Swype
This is very interesting, but will this work on any 4.0 device? btw, no need to re-post the same thing (no offence)
Jason-EX said:
This is very interesting, but will this work on any 4.0 device? btw, no need to re-post the same thing (no offence)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hillbeast tried to compile it for his serenity builds but got errors along the way i think we need a better kernel to use it
Sent from my GT-I5800 using XDA
It would be compiled in kernel 3.x
Cheers
Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by RemICS S III-looking rom!
bscraze said:
It would be compiled in kernel 3.x
Cheers
Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by RemICS S III-looking rom!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well, that will be awesome :good:
Jason-EX said:
well, that will be awesome :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it would really be. I just posted it because I thought kernel 3.x could handle it.
Sorry for double-posting this topic.
Anyway; if our developers find more time and are able to make kernel 3.x running
(which would be awesome!) our phone would get an enourmous speed-boost.
We have used it in our CM9 port on LG P500, but there are still some issues to solve, but our Linaro-build is smooth So good luck! If a dev needs some info on how to include it in their code, look at our project-site github.com/lgics