Related
Hey guys
I'm more of a reader than a poster but anyway, I came across a guy that has created a ICS Rom with the help of some guys on here I believe ???
Anyway the ROM is there for download and sees to be pretty close to a finished artical.
I guess go have a look give it a try and if it is as described then Happy New Year to everyone
http://sgs2android.weebly.com/downloads.html
Enjoy
airbus360........
Sent from my Galaxy S2 using Tapatalk
Look at his build.prop, sais everything about this guy. Instead of crediting Teamhacksung for almost everything he took from them he just insults them in his super tuned build.prop.
I`m afraid to ask... changelog???
rtimoff said:
afraid to ask... changelog???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The same as the latest build from codeworkx, plus some magical build.prop tweaks:
http://sgs2android.weebly.com said:
Download link to BETA 1.0 in the download section/
- New kernel XXKP4 is going to be used,
- Headphones are fixed
- Have added those cm9 tweaks that the CM team were all being ro.arrogant.c***s=1 about them, Runs faster and stable compared to CM9
- Audio is fully fixed. Media Volume now Changes.
- Camera now takes at full 8mp.
- YouTube playback is now working but has some colour issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cTrox said:
The same as the latest build from codeworkx, plus some magical build.prop tweaks:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, thx
So, what the point of this thread?
well I guess theres some conflict here but as long as the Rom works and everyone that was involved gets a mention I'm happy. Surley thats the main thing right give everyone what they want, anyway thats enough from me, happy new year to you guys its there if you want it
Does the ROM work fine?
Any nitz and RIL issues?
All this slating of airbus360. However if anyone bothers to try his rom, it is much better. I've been using cm9 since the first alpha up to the most recent release. It was good, but not a patch on this. Airbus's rom is much smoother, especially when flicking between home screens. Its also a lot faster. So although he may have used Teamhacksung code, he's obviously incorporated a few improvements of his own. Before anyone criticises, they should install it. It's a step up from the current cm9 builds.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
blinde said:
Any nitz and RIL issues?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is exactly the same as CM9, except it's not using CM9 launcher and quick toggles in status bar.
So, is this rom fully working? What remains to be fixed?
This is not a development thread, there is no development going on. So, moving this to general.
freemini said:
This is exactly the same as CM9, except it's not using CM9 launcher and quick toggles in status bar.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is my whole point, if you bothered to install this, you would realise it is not the same as cm9. Don't listen to others and try it yourself. Its much smoother and faster
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Maggot82 said:
well I guess theres some conflict here but as long as the Rom works and everyone that was involved gets a mention I'm happy. Surley thats the main thing right give everyone what they want, anyway thats enough from me, happy new year to you guys its there if you want it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
with all due respect- can you give us changelog from author?
rtimoff said:
with all due respect- can you give us changelog from author?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already gave you the changelog from the author. It's right here: http://sgs2android.weebly.com
Is it good for everyday use? Since KP1 was terrible. TIA
He has also mentioned this in his website
Update 30/12/11 @ 12:27PM
- Using CM9 lib's from Teamhacksung to fix things in this as we speak.* Please say thanks to them
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
anyway, will be useful if someone provides feedback of this. the latest build of cm9 itself is running smooth and great!
bala_gamer said:
He has also mentioned this in his website
anyway, will be useful if someone provides feedback of this. the latest build of cm9 itself is running smooth and great!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Noon Question. How to install this so called beta version. Help pls.....
Been using this since last night.
Basically, looks the same as CM9 minus a few modifications, yet the ROM is a lot smoother then CM9.
Battery for me is great, roughly 1% loss an hour. Removed all uneeded apps via Titanium Backup.
Ive noticed one slight problem with the incoming call screen, icons misplaced. BUT, Still can be used.
I've had No FC's either.
I do really reccomend this ROM
Hello,
Just wanted to say my impression on Lidroid ICS ROM. I have been using almost all LPB based Roms lately. The only one that stayed longer was MODGalaxy, which is a clean stock Samsung LPB Rom.
Having read about Lidroid dev here and his mods, I read that he issues his Rom based on ICS too in his forum. So I gave it a try. Apart of some apps in Chinese language, a nice keyboard but unfortunately for Chinese language, I am really impressed for its smoothness. The rom has 14 icon mod, percentage battery, Lockapp, Root Explorer and other goodness by default.
I have removed some of the local apps with Root Explorer and inserted an ICS keyboard. Now everything runs good for me.
I am trying today and just wanted to say to brave hearts to give it a try too. You will be impressed I think or hope...
albsat said:
Just wanted to say
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
<snip>
I also just wanted to say that I really hope this current trend of "My first impressions with xxx" threads ends soon. Sure, by all means, posts, but whole threads? It's getting old, quickly.
oinkylicious said:
<snip>
I also just wanted to say that I really hope this current trend of "My first impressions with xxx" threads ends soon. Sure, by all means, posts, but whole threads? It's getting old, quickly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My first impression with your post is mostly one of agreement.
Can u pls share the forum link for that ics rom....
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
albsat said:
Hello,
Just wanted to say my impression on Lidroid ICS ROM. I have been using almost all LPB based Roms lately. The only one that stayed longer was MODGalaxy, which is a clean stock Samsung LPB Rom.
Having read about Lidroid dev here and his mods, I read that he issues his Rom based on ICS too in his forum. So I gave it a try. Apart of some apps in Chinese language, a nice keyboard but unfortunately for Chinese language, I am really impressed for its smoothness. The rom has 14 icon mod, percentage battery, Lockapp, Root Explorer and other goodness by default.
I have removed some of the local apps with Root Explorer and inserted an ICS keyboard. Now everything runs good for me.
I am trying today and just wanted to say to brave hearts to give it a try too. You will be impressed I think or hope...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pretty sure most of the ics roms in the development (not original) section are based on this anyway.
am using AndyXRom V5.1.....so for so gud..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
OMG!
I'm using the super secret XXMPF Final beta alpha release of ICS 4.0.4 with full stock Samsung ICS experience and 18 button mod + Automatic snap of desktop mod + Super Turbo Speed script v16.9! It's smooth like a baby's bottom and makes my SGS2 auto-upgradable to SGS3 by OTA! You guys'll love it once you install it!
karendar said:
I'm using the super secret XXMPF Final beta alpha release of ICS 4.0.4 with full stock Samsung ICS experience and 18 button mod + Automatic snap of desktop mod + Super Turbo Speed script v16.9! It's smooth like a baby's bottom and makes my SGS2 auto-upgradable to SGS3 by OTA! You guys'll love it once you install it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
loled xDDDDDDD
karendar said:
I'm using the super secret XXMPF Final beta alpha release of ICS 4.0.4 with full stock Samsung ICS experience and 18 button mod + Automatic snap of desktop mod + Super Turbo Speed script v16.9! It's smooth like a baby's bottom and makes my SGS2 auto-upgradable to SGS3 by OTA! You guys'll love it once you install it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Truth is ICS is nothing but a collection of init d scripts. True fable.
mudferret said:
Truth is ICS is nothing but a collection of init d scripts. True fable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's not forget ICS kernel is just Honeycomb Kernel with 2-3 patches! *flashes Honeycomb Xoom kernel to SGS2, prays phone doesn't blow up*
where's the lidroid ICS rom? I only found gingerbread rom
elmerendeiro said:
where's the lidroid ICS rom? I only found gingerbread rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google Lidroid ics; he has a blog with dl link.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
mudferret said:
Google Lidroid ics; he has a blog with dl link.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Personally I can't find it when I Googled. Just this thread, then loads of Chinese websites! If only I knew mandarin!
rice and pea(ce)
Here ( use Google translate ):
http://bbs.lidroid.com/t-91355-1-1.html
mudferret said:
Truth is ICS is nothing but a collection of init d scripts. True fable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Excusez-moi?
Konstantinos said:
Excusez-moi?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Misaotra
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Konstantinos said:
Excusez-moi?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
C'est une blague. Relativement drôle aussi!
Another first impressions thread... Maybe someone should start a second impressions thread?
Come on guys. I just wanted to let you know about a Rom that is not available in this forum. This post was not about my impressions but mostly about knowing and trying a Rom outside of XDA.
Or maybe I could say my last impressions about this thread before it gets closed?
Usually, (for other devices of course), ICS roms that are developed from AOSP tend to be more stable, less buggy and better than CM9 roms, so im kind of curious why Atrix developers have decided to work on CM9, even thought its far from complete?
Just a question.
djluis48 said:
Usually, (for other devices of course), ICS roms that are developed from AOSP tend to be more stable, less buggy and better than CM9 roms, so im kind of curious why Atrix developers have decided to work on CM9, even thought its far from complete?
Just a question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
because CM9 is what we all want in the end.
djluis48 said:
Usually, (for other devices of course), ICS roms that are developed from AOSP tend to be more stable, less buggy and better than CM9 roms, so im kind of curious why Atrix developers have decided to work on CM9, even thought its far from complete?
Just a question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not 100% but I think the developers need something from the moto/nvidia which is why the rom was ported from the photon and not just built From the ground up .
Again not 100%
Sent from the Atrix of Chuck Norris.
djluis48 said:
Usually, (for other devices of course), ICS roms that are developed from AOSP tend to be more stable, less buggy and better than CM9 roms, so im kind of curious why Atrix developers have decided to work on CM9, even thought its far from complete?
Just a question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NVidia won't release the drivers and sources required to accomplish this, so a 1/2 ass port is all that can be done at the moment. This has nothing to do with the devs. They are giving us the best they can with what they have right now.
djluis48 said:
Usually, (for other devices of course), ICS roms that are developed from AOSP tend to be more stable, less buggy and better than CM9 roms, so im kind of curious why Atrix developers have decided to work on CM9, even thought its far from complete?
Just a question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please open eyes before posting. Development are working hard and doing what they can.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
JayRolla said:
Please open eyes before posting. Development are working hard and doing what they can.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not saying that they arent working hard, just asking why they choosing CM9 instead of AOSP 4.0, just a simple question. And ponting out that builds based on AOSP seems to be more solid and stable than builds based on CM9, mostly because CM9 itself its still not from complete
Sent from my MB860 using XDA
Also, IIRC, they're borrowing heavily from CM7 for our current CM9 builds. I believe we'll see more options when we finally get official source and drivers in Q3.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
CaelanT said:
NVidia won't release the drivers and sources required to accomplish this, so a 1/2 ass port is all that can be done at the moment. This has nothing to do with the devs. They are giving us the best they can with what they have right now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please read the above before commenting again! If you had read it the first time you would not have posted what you did below!.............Or maybe you still would have, who knows!!! You can program all you want for an AOSP ROM, but without device specific drivers you can never optimize for any one device. Simple as this, for any ICS on the Atrix, whether AOSP, CM9, MIUI, or whatever, you still need device drivers. Try running your NVidia graphics card in your computer without a driver................yeah, see what I mean (but then again you might like 640 x 480!)!
djluis48 said:
Not saying that they arent working hard, just asking why they choosing CM9 instead of AOSP 4.0, just a simple question. And ponting out that builds based on AOSP seems to be more solid and stable than builds based on CM9, mostly because CM9 itself its still not from complete
Sent from my MB860 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
BTW...........Please link the AOSP 4.0 builds for the Atrix you are referring to!
CaelanT said:
Please read the above before commenting again! If you had read it the first time you would not have posted what you did below!.............Or maybe you still would have, who knows!!! You can program all you want for an AOSP ROM, but without device specific drivers you can never optimize for any one device. Simple as this, for any ICS on the Atrix, whether AOSP, CM9, MIUI, or whatever, you still need device drivers. Try running your NVidia graphics card in your computer without a driver................yeah, see what I mean (but then again you might like 640 x 480!)!
BTW...........Please link the AOSP 4.0 builds for the Atrix you are referring to!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're rude.
Purple Drama Llama said:
You're rude.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No! I already answered the question earlier in the thread, but OP obviously is not reading and persists.
Both my posts were quite nice actually!
Bye!
BTW, why no comment about this post being rude?:
JayRolla said:
Please open eyes before posting. Development are working hard and doing what they can.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CaelanT said:
BTW...........Please link the AOSP 4.0 builds for the Atrix you are referring to![/B]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Woops, i forgot to tell that i was refering to other devices AOSP 4.0 ROMS, but if you are as inteligent as you seems to be, you should have known that because the Atrix actually doesn't have any rom coded from AOPS 4.0, at least on this forum.
The roms i was refering to was ICS Passion and ICS Euforia, both made by the same developer, Neobuddy, made for the Samsung Vibrant, a 1ghz phone, with 512mb for ram, without official drivrrs released, and the rom is more stable than the current Atrix ICS builds (no offend, i recongnize the guys are doing a great job making it happen), and almost as smooth as a the builds, and that phone is in a similar condition driver-related, that its, without any drivers being released. Thats why my doubt came, why the developers chiosed CM9 as a base, even thought it isnt really stable yet, and not completed, and why builds made from AOSP 4.0 tend to be more stable?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA
djluis48 said:
Woops, i forgot to tell that i was refering to other devices AOSP 4.0 ROMS, but if you are as inteligent as you seems to be, you should have known that because the Atrix actually doesn't have any rom coded from AOPS 4.0, at least on this forum.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And that's why I asked you to link them. You are comparing AOSP ROM's on other devices to CM9 on other devices. Because you see something run more smoothly on one device, does not directly mean it will run smoothly on another device. In any event, your question was answered in as far as there are drivers and source that the devs do not have in order to make any ICS based ROM's work optimally on the Atrix. If I had to hazard a guess as to why the devs are using CM9 as a base, it would be because the groundwork has been laid for them. The Atrix doesn't have an army of devs, so we get a smaller mix of options with ROM's.
CaelanT said:
And that's why I asked you to link them. You are comparing AOSP ROM's on other devices to CM9 on other devices. Because you see something run more smoothly on one device, does not directly mean it will run smoothly on another device. In any event, your question was answered in as far as there are drivers and source that the devs do not have in order to make any ICS based ROM's work optimally on the Atrix. If I had to hazard a guess as to why the devs are using CM9 as a base, it would be because the groundwork has been laid for them. The Atrix doesn't have an army of devs, so we get a smaller mix of options with ROM's.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The OP was asking why the Atrix doesn't have AOSP ROM's.. so you.. ask him to link them?
I've been lurking around the forums since the release of this phone and you have got to be one of my favorite posters so far, give me a good laugh every time.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Celidonius said:
The OP was asking why the Atrix doesn't have AOSP ROM's.. so you.. ask him to link them?
I've been lurking around the forums since the release of this phone and you have got to be one of my favorite posters so far, give me a good laugh every time.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wrote something about that yesterday but in the mist of trying to add a pic xda app fc'd.
+1
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
I kind of think I get what the OP is asking. He's asking why build a really souped up race car where as a regular car is just as fine. Seems like he's not picky and he would be content with anything stable vs anything available now. But that's another thread isn't it?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA
After that many people ask me to compile a version of phenomenal (an undervolted speedmod kernel) for galaxy note, I decided to do it.
So, I HAVEN'T GALAXY NOTE! For this reason I need your help.
First I'd like know your undervolted experience, to know what voltages do you use?
Thanks!
fenomeno83 said:
After that many people ask me to compile a version of phenomenal (an undervolted speedmod kernel) for galaxy note, I decided to do it.
So, I HAVEN'T GALAXY NOTE! For this reason I need your help.
First I'd like know your undervolted experience, to know what voltages do you use?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice...I was using your kernel on sgs2...
For gingerbread?
robertberma said:
For gingerbread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
indeed this kernel for gingerbread
When ics is around the corner? Gb is a dying rase, i hope this kernel is comming before ics than.
robertberma said:
When ics is around the corner? Gb is a dying rase, i hope this kernel is comming before ics than.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Considering the issues with emmc and stability, I would say that Sammy is not even close to providing a correct ICS rom.
Let them just release the drivers, after all here at XDA we have all the good devs to cook us a good set of kernels for TW or AOSP roms, don't we?
That is just wishful thinking of course;-)
Sent from the great Note
Please make one for ICS.
There's a missing hole in my device, it cries out for SmartAssv2 governor on an optimized kernel. (Frequency is 400Mhz under/1.4GHz over, we don't have the voltage option yet, sigh)
I use this daily (the ones that say current, the saved ones are the original voltages) with abyss kernel 100% stable and I usually set the min speed to 400MHz and Max to 1400MHz or 1700MHz depending on my needs.
I can lower all voltages by 0.025v but then I'll get a couple crashes a week so i prefer to keep the voltages just one step higher.
robertberma said:
When ics is around the corner? Gb is a dying rase, i hope this kernel is comming before ics than.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. We really need some good ICS metals. Apart from the CM9 kernel and DAFUQ, I do not see anything else here.
And after Entropy's warning not to flash leaked kernels, I am beginning to wonder if there is some other good kernel for ICS ROMs.
We would be grateful if make this an ICS kernel. We can live with one less good GB kernel /methinks
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
gramessh said:
I agree. We really need some good ICS metals. Apart from the CM9 kernel and DAFUQ, I do not see anything else here.
And after Entropy's warning not to flash leaked kernels, I am beginning to wonder if there is some other good kernel for ICS ROMs.
We would be grateful if make this an ICS kernel. We can live with one less good GB kernel /methinks
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does chinese leaks we must forget. Nothing wrong with thise kernels if you have a chinese Note. Look at sgs2 forum. Already samsung released there the sources and there are 5 ore more custom kernels. So samsung is doing a great job for them releasing so soon sources. We have to be patient and not start making cm9 with sources from sgs2. So stupid.
robertberma said:
Does chinese leaks we must forget. Nothing wrong with thise kernels if you have a chinese Note. Look at sgs2 forum. Already samsung released there the sources and there are 5 ore more custom kernels. So samsung is doing a great job for them releasing so soon sources. We have to be patient and not start making cm9 with sources from sgs2. So stupid.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True but SGS2 sales are at least four times more than that if the note. The note is like a flagship device but its not getting the best treatment yet. We can't expect the sources to be out before the official ICS release.
I am just happy we even have official CM9 support. The problem though, is because DAFUQ supports only TW ROMs :-| and we have no good kernels (except leak ones) for the AOSP/AOKP ROMs.
So much good ROM development here for AOSP. Yet, no real safe kernels for em yet. Pity!
He's back! Another robertberma anti-spirit comment.
Excuse me for the intro, but most of the work here at XDA started with hacking and making open sourced stuff out of closed source material.
Indeed we already have a few good GB kernels, and an additional developer on ICS would be greatly appreciated. ICS is coming soon, and considering the time spent on tuning a kernel, I think that it would be more productive to start working on an ICS kernel than on GB.
However if this GB kernel is a first step to get knowledge of the Note specifics and followed by an ICS one, it's all good.
Sent from the great Note
@fenomeno83
Forgive me if this question is really nooby.
Is it possible for a custom ICS kernel to support both TW and AOSP? Are their frameworks too different?
Most (or maybe all) of the GB kernels I see here are for GB. They may be themed but I still see the TW framework everywhere.
If possible, wouldnt it be nice to make a kernel that supports both?
sudisk said:
He's back! Another robertberma anti-spirit comment.
Excuse me for the intro, but most of the work here at XDA started with hacking and making open sourced stuff out of closed source material.
Indeed we already have a few good GB kernels, and an additional developer on ICS would be greatly appreciated. ICS is coming soon, and considering the time spent on tuning a kernel, I think that it would be more productive to start working on an ICS kernel than on GB.
However if this GB kernel is a first step to get knowledge of the Note specifics and followed by an ICS one, it's all good.
Sent from the great Note
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha I think it will not help developing ics kernel by develop a gb kernel. I just say we have to be patient and wait for sourses to continue develop a ics kernel that is save. We have great devs for aosp and cm9 roms but there hands are tied behind there backs without sourses. Now they use stupid chinese **** thats not save. We getting of topic here.
Make this gb kernel fast and i hope he continue his work when ics comes out. And make a speedy ics kernel for sammy, aosp and cm9 roms. ONE KERNEL FOR ALL ROMS.
---------- Post added at 01:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:34 PM ----------
gramessh said:
@fenomeno83
Forgive me if this question is really nooby.
Is it possible for a custom ICS kernel to support both TW and AOSP? Are their frameworks too different?
Most (or maybe all) of the GB kernels I see here are for GB. They may be themed but I still see the TW framework everywhere.
If possible, wouldnt it be nice to make a kernel that supports both?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes look at sgs2 forum. They are loaded with does kernels for all roms.
robertberma said:
Now they use stupid chinese **** thats not save.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah, welcome back, Bobby.
I cannot even begin to tell you how we all missed your sunny disposition, bubbly personality, observant mind and
always original, refreshing and precise way of expressing your comprehensive thoughts.
chasmodo said:
Ah, welcome back, Bobby.
I cannot even begin to tell you how we all missed your sunny disposition, bubbly personality, observant mind and
always original, refreshing and precise way of expressing your comprehensive thoughts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Missed you to and your startrek picture quote on every noob quastion.
robertberma said:
Missed you to and your startrek picture quote on every noob quastion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hase™ a quastion™ too! Where have you been dude?
Back to topic: The need for kernels are so relative to the users that need it.
Variety truly is nice.
Reb0rn said:
I hase™ a quastion™ too! Where have you been dude?
Back to topic: The need for kernels are so relative to the users that need it.
Variety truly is nice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Banned for having two accounts. I am little bit Schizophrenic. Whaha
sudisk said:
He's back! Another robertberma anti-spirit comment.
Excuse me for the intro, but most of the work here at XDA started with hacking and making open sourced stuff out of closed source material.
Indeed we already have a few good GB kernels, and an additional developer on ICS would be greatly appreciated. ICS is coming soon, and considering the time spent on tuning a kernel, I think that it would be more productive to start working on an ICS kernel than on GB.
However if this GB kernel is a first step to get knowledge of the Note specifics and followed by an ICS one, it's all good.
Sent from the great Note
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not see any anti- spiritism in his comment. He was saying the obvious fact
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Moved To General
As this contains no development, it belongs in the general section.
hi
was the development for the slim ics port stopped? because the thread just vanished and i can't find it again. Am i too stupid or did somebody really delete it?
the thread about the sd version is still there: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1763112
the thread was here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1759815
cu
I haven't been following it lately, but I saw a dispute whether the developer should have made a slim version of an already available ROM or not. So it is likely that the original ROM developer asked to cease the slim port and sought a thread closure.
Marvlesz said:
I haven't been following it lately, but I saw a dispute whether the developer should have made a slim version of an already available ROM or not. So it is likely that the original ROM developer asked to cease the slim port and sought a thread closure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if the thread would have been simply closed like others i would agree, but this thread vanished completely. the dispute was on the first two pages. how can a rom-cooker demand that his android rom doesn't get ported? credits where given where they where due and apart of that aosp is oss.
Screemi said:
if the thread would have been simply closed like others i would agree, but this thread vanished completely. the dispute was on the first two pages. how can a rom-cooker demand that his android rom doesn't get ported? credits where given where they where due and apart of that aosp is oss.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fully agree wirh you.
What was wrong with porting rom and giving credits to original Dev?
For me it was the fastest, smallest ics rom for hd2.
Sent from my SlimICS using xda premium
Post deleted. But i have links. Long live Google Cache
From slim ics site:
"Supported Devices here, no extra devices for now ( and NO PORTS of Slim ICS)"
"http://source.android.com New versions will also be announced through this site."
"Fully built from AOSP sources with some cherry picks from CM and AOKP team, Easy to customize features (thanks to AOKP team)"
Atm trying to be calm but... Lets just say it piss me off this kind of thing.
This guy need to look at Miui team, they have right set of mind.
Sent from my SlimICS using xda premium
Where is @zorua BTW? Has him have deleted too?
Traukoman said:
Where is @zorua BTW? Has him have deleted too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hope not!
It would be nice if a moderator (or someone that knows and is objective about it) can tell us what happened. If it ended up in a heated argument I wouldn't want someone telling us only his half of the story - but I really would like to know.
DeeinSouthAfrica said:
Hope not!
It would be nice if a moderator (or someone that knows and is objective about it) can tell us what happened. If it ended up in a heated argument I wouldn't want someone telling us only his half of the story - but I really would like to know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here. Btw dev of original Slim ics rom seems had allergy reaction on porting his rom. As i allready posted. What i dont get it, how in open source community is it possible? Isn't whole point to be open, share with ofc giving credits to ppl which contributed?
Sent from my SlimICS using xda premium
maneken25 said:
Same here. Btw dev of original Slim ics rom seems had allergy reaction on porting his rom. As i allready posted. What i dont get it, how in open source community is it possible? Isn't whole point to be open, share with ofc giving credits to ppl which contributed?
Sent from my SlimICS using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it was pulled by a moderator upon request personally I think it's within reason. The thread wasn't stated as being Unofficial, which it should have been, and with a system partition of 130MB it can hardly even be called a slim OS (other full fat ROMs are 150); nevermind comparable to SlimICS which are half that size (54 - 70). And besides the last post I seen on the thread was from the OP who said he wasn't happy with the build and wanted to change the ROM he was porting from, and it was only an alpha.
On a similar note, if a small ICS rom is to come along, I personally thing it would be benificial if we could utilise squashfs. This would require kernel support, the toggles are there to turn on squashfs support in dorimanx, but it may require a module from somewhere, I'll PM dori tomorrow concerning this unless someone here know if squash can/can't be used with our bootloaders / device. Only problem I can for see is in module compatibility, and if it works should allow for smaller versions of our current ROMs.
Your position is legit but non of the slim ics roms include gapps and trebucht as launcher. It was comparable to other full roms with about 50-100mb less memory. And for me it's totally legit to port a ROM from one to an other device if you give credit and state which Tom was ported. Would be different if there was some own coding for tools and drivers was done. Don't distribute my tools without my permission is different than don't share something i picked up somewhere else and used it for my own work. That's not how the gold licence works.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using xda app-developers app
HypoTurtle said:
If it was pulled by a moderator upon request personally I think it's within reason. The thread wasn't stated as being Unofficial, which it should have been, and with a system partition of 130MB it can hardly even be called a slim OS (other full fat ROMs are 150); nevermind comparable to SlimICS which are half that size (54 - 70). And besides the last post I seen on the thread was from the OP who said he wasn't happy with the build and wanted to change the ROM he was porting from, and it was only an alpha.
On a similar note, if a small ICS rom is to come along, I personally thing it would be benificial if we could utilise squashfs. This would require kernel support, the toggles are there to turn on squashfs support in dorimanx, but it may require a module from somewhere, I'll PM dori tomorrow concerning this unless someone here know if squash can/can't be used with our bootloaders / device. Only problem I can for see is in module compatibility, and if it works should allow for smaller versions of our current ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most of ics roms are from 150 to 220m(miui).
This rom without gapps was around 85mb.
I have atm slim ics with trimmed gapps and some media files that fit in less then 120mb, if i compare to other ics rom which i used as trimmet down, they were from 140 to 190mb imho it was really Slim version of rom
Edit: Maybe it was beta version but worked without problems and it was the fastest ics i tried and i tried them alot
Sent from my SlimICS using xda premium
maneken25 said:
Most of ics roms are from 150 to 220m(miui).
This rom without gapps was around 85mb.
I have atm slim ics with trimmed gapps and some media files that fit in less then 120mb, if i compare to other ics rom which i used as trimmet down, they were from 140 to 190mb imho it was really Slim version of rom
Edit: Maybe it was beta version but worked without problems and it was the fastest ics i tried and i tried them alot
Sent from my SlimICS using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fair point, the last zip I downloaded had a system folder of 130MB thats where I got my sizes from,have had a play with squashfs and have shrunk this down from 130 to 92MB. Will try tomorrow to get a kernel to compile properly and see if squash works here. Haven't tried slim myself, currently running PA and can't see how it can be faster. Have you had any issues when trying to make a call /pressing the call button?
Screemi said:
Your position is legit but non of the slim ics roms include gapps and trebucht as launcher. It was comparable to other full roms with about 50-100mb less memory. And for me it's totally legit to port a Tom from one to an other device if you give credit and state which Tom was ported. Would be different if there was some own coding for tools and drivers was done. Don't distribute my tools without my permission is different than don't share something i picked up somewhere else and used it for my own work. That's not how the gold licence works.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tom who?
The thread is not in the trash-can subforum (Confirmed)
It was serious then
+ Que PPC said:
Tom who?
The thread is not in the trash-can subforum (Confirmed)
It was serious then
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tom is dictionary suggestion for ROM, it happens often to my SwiftKey keyboard also
Sent from my SlimICS using xda premium
HypoTurtle said:
Fair point, the last zip I downloaded had a system folder of 130MB thats where I got my sizes from,have had a play with squashfs and have shrunk this down from 130 to 92MB. Will try tomorrow to get a kernel to compile properly and see if squash works here. Haven't tried slim myself, currently running PA and can't see how it can be faster. Have you had any issues when trying to make a call /pressing the call button?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If i don't consider common issues which have most of ics hd2, like sometimes funky memory management which on heavy duty can produce little problems, there aren't any un ordinary problem.
Calls working very snappy.
In fact whole rom is fast, responsive, low battery consumption, apps which i tested working correctly even Ted app.
Sent from my SlimICS using xda premium
+ Que PPC said:
Tom who?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
don't you know Tom the damnautocorrection cat?
Mmhh, not even in the trash sub and the user got deleted as well? Must have been really serious. Would love to know what happened.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using xda app-developers app
Screemi said:
don't you know Tom the damnautocorrection cat?
Mmhh, not even in the trash sub and the user got deleted as well? Must have been really serious. Would love to know what happened.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
he didnt get deleted http://forum.xda-developers.com/member.php?u=4212197
HypoTurtle said:
Haven't tried slim myself, currently running PA and can't see how it can be faster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried both, as well as some other ICS rom and believe me, it's faster than any other 4.0.4 around here. In fact I'm using it as my daily and I find it excellent, such a shame the thread has been deleted.
Hi ppl, sorry for the silence on this. Apparently there was a problem with permissions for Zorua's thread, I asked the moderators advice on the future of my thread, and it was decided to close my thread also. I have no problem with this decision.
Sorry for any inconvenience to anybody caused by this episode.
It is a great shame though, it was a really nice build.