After that many people ask me to compile a version of phenomenal (an undervolted speedmod kernel) for galaxy note, I decided to do it.
So, I HAVEN'T GALAXY NOTE! For this reason I need your help.
First I'd like know your undervolted experience, to know what voltages do you use?
Thanks!
fenomeno83 said:
After that many people ask me to compile a version of phenomenal (an undervolted speedmod kernel) for galaxy note, I decided to do it.
So, I HAVEN'T GALAXY NOTE! For this reason I need your help.
First I'd like know your undervolted experience, to know what voltages do you use?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice...I was using your kernel on sgs2...
For gingerbread?
robertberma said:
For gingerbread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
indeed this kernel for gingerbread
When ics is around the corner? Gb is a dying rase, i hope this kernel is comming before ics than.
robertberma said:
When ics is around the corner? Gb is a dying rase, i hope this kernel is comming before ics than.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Considering the issues with emmc and stability, I would say that Sammy is not even close to providing a correct ICS rom.
Let them just release the drivers, after all here at XDA we have all the good devs to cook us a good set of kernels for TW or AOSP roms, don't we?
That is just wishful thinking of course;-)
Sent from the great Note
Please make one for ICS.
There's a missing hole in my device, it cries out for SmartAssv2 governor on an optimized kernel. (Frequency is 400Mhz under/1.4GHz over, we don't have the voltage option yet, sigh)
I use this daily (the ones that say current, the saved ones are the original voltages) with abyss kernel 100% stable and I usually set the min speed to 400MHz and Max to 1400MHz or 1700MHz depending on my needs.
I can lower all voltages by 0.025v but then I'll get a couple crashes a week so i prefer to keep the voltages just one step higher.
robertberma said:
When ics is around the corner? Gb is a dying rase, i hope this kernel is comming before ics than.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. We really need some good ICS metals. Apart from the CM9 kernel and DAFUQ, I do not see anything else here.
And after Entropy's warning not to flash leaked kernels, I am beginning to wonder if there is some other good kernel for ICS ROMs.
We would be grateful if make this an ICS kernel. We can live with one less good GB kernel /methinks
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
gramessh said:
I agree. We really need some good ICS metals. Apart from the CM9 kernel and DAFUQ, I do not see anything else here.
And after Entropy's warning not to flash leaked kernels, I am beginning to wonder if there is some other good kernel for ICS ROMs.
We would be grateful if make this an ICS kernel. We can live with one less good GB kernel /methinks
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does chinese leaks we must forget. Nothing wrong with thise kernels if you have a chinese Note. Look at sgs2 forum. Already samsung released there the sources and there are 5 ore more custom kernels. So samsung is doing a great job for them releasing so soon sources. We have to be patient and not start making cm9 with sources from sgs2. So stupid.
robertberma said:
Does chinese leaks we must forget. Nothing wrong with thise kernels if you have a chinese Note. Look at sgs2 forum. Already samsung released there the sources and there are 5 ore more custom kernels. So samsung is doing a great job for them releasing so soon sources. We have to be patient and not start making cm9 with sources from sgs2. So stupid.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True but SGS2 sales are at least four times more than that if the note. The note is like a flagship device but its not getting the best treatment yet. We can't expect the sources to be out before the official ICS release.
I am just happy we even have official CM9 support. The problem though, is because DAFUQ supports only TW ROMs :-| and we have no good kernels (except leak ones) for the AOSP/AOKP ROMs.
So much good ROM development here for AOSP. Yet, no real safe kernels for em yet. Pity!
He's back! Another robertberma anti-spirit comment.
Excuse me for the intro, but most of the work here at XDA started with hacking and making open sourced stuff out of closed source material.
Indeed we already have a few good GB kernels, and an additional developer on ICS would be greatly appreciated. ICS is coming soon, and considering the time spent on tuning a kernel, I think that it would be more productive to start working on an ICS kernel than on GB.
However if this GB kernel is a first step to get knowledge of the Note specifics and followed by an ICS one, it's all good.
Sent from the great Note
@fenomeno83
Forgive me if this question is really nooby.
Is it possible for a custom ICS kernel to support both TW and AOSP? Are their frameworks too different?
Most (or maybe all) of the GB kernels I see here are for GB. They may be themed but I still see the TW framework everywhere.
If possible, wouldnt it be nice to make a kernel that supports both?
sudisk said:
He's back! Another robertberma anti-spirit comment.
Excuse me for the intro, but most of the work here at XDA started with hacking and making open sourced stuff out of closed source material.
Indeed we already have a few good GB kernels, and an additional developer on ICS would be greatly appreciated. ICS is coming soon, and considering the time spent on tuning a kernel, I think that it would be more productive to start working on an ICS kernel than on GB.
However if this GB kernel is a first step to get knowledge of the Note specifics and followed by an ICS one, it's all good.
Sent from the great Note
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha I think it will not help developing ics kernel by develop a gb kernel. I just say we have to be patient and wait for sourses to continue develop a ics kernel that is save. We have great devs for aosp and cm9 roms but there hands are tied behind there backs without sourses. Now they use stupid chinese **** thats not save. We getting of topic here.
Make this gb kernel fast and i hope he continue his work when ics comes out. And make a speedy ics kernel for sammy, aosp and cm9 roms. ONE KERNEL FOR ALL ROMS.
---------- Post added at 01:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:34 PM ----------
gramessh said:
@fenomeno83
Forgive me if this question is really nooby.
Is it possible for a custom ICS kernel to support both TW and AOSP? Are their frameworks too different?
Most (or maybe all) of the GB kernels I see here are for GB. They may be themed but I still see the TW framework everywhere.
If possible, wouldnt it be nice to make a kernel that supports both?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes look at sgs2 forum. They are loaded with does kernels for all roms.
robertberma said:
Now they use stupid chinese **** thats not save.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah, welcome back, Bobby.
I cannot even begin to tell you how we all missed your sunny disposition, bubbly personality, observant mind and
always original, refreshing and precise way of expressing your comprehensive thoughts.
chasmodo said:
Ah, welcome back, Bobby.
I cannot even begin to tell you how we all missed your sunny disposition, bubbly personality, observant mind and
always original, refreshing and precise way of expressing your comprehensive thoughts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Missed you to and your startrek picture quote on every noob quastion.
robertberma said:
Missed you to and your startrek picture quote on every noob quastion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hase™ a quastion™ too! Where have you been dude?
Back to topic: The need for kernels are so relative to the users that need it.
Variety truly is nice.
Reb0rn said:
I hase™ a quastion™ too! Where have you been dude?
Back to topic: The need for kernels are so relative to the users that need it.
Variety truly is nice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Banned for having two accounts. I am little bit Schizophrenic. Whaha
sudisk said:
He's back! Another robertberma anti-spirit comment.
Excuse me for the intro, but most of the work here at XDA started with hacking and making open sourced stuff out of closed source material.
Indeed we already have a few good GB kernels, and an additional developer on ICS would be greatly appreciated. ICS is coming soon, and considering the time spent on tuning a kernel, I think that it would be more productive to start working on an ICS kernel than on GB.
However if this GB kernel is a first step to get knowledge of the Note specifics and followed by an ICS one, it's all good.
Sent from the great Note
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not see any anti- spiritism in his comment. He was saying the obvious fact
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Moved To General
As this contains no development, it belongs in the general section.
Related
Are the virtuous ROMs dead ? should we switch to Taboonay ?
EDIT:
1. ALL the 4 virtuous ROMs are stuck at their versions for the past few days since 19th July
2. http://www.virtuousrom.com/ update from 22nd July states that UNITY project is on hold.
EDIT 2: People are saying "this thread should not clutter Dev threads".... well, please read the bolded part above. Asking Qs in generic area about Dev status of ROMs would be inappropriate.
EDIT 3: I think too many folks took this negatively. Changed topic from "[Q] Are the virtuous ROMs dead ? should we switch to Taboonay ?" to "[Q] What is the status of virtuous ROMs ? UNITY kernel ?". Hope that clarifies that this thread is not to denigrate any developer.
rshetye said:
Are the virtuous ROMs dead ? should we switch to Taboonay ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There will be a new Super ROM out any day, call the "SuperHootchieCoochie ROM". Wait for it, cuz when it hits, it's gonna make ALL other ROMS obsolete!
rshetye said:
Are the virtuous ROMs dead ? should we switch to Taboonay ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol guess you are one of the spoilt ones as no updates for a few days everyone panics. they are not dead but i do think if there are no major updates from the sources then nothing more to add i am afraid. what i would like to see is kernel updates for the actual virtuous roms available. its not secret i love virtuous galaxy but thats stuck on unity v7 while some have v8/9 etc. mdj has said that galaxy will be updated when updated firmware is released. i am not a flashaholic like some as once i have a stable offering i am happy however i do like to have the latest available. i am currently trying out thor galaxy v1 to see what that offers as its a fusion of galaxy and asus goodness. i have stayed away from official acer 3.1 mods ad acer driers are not the best. saying that virtuous picasso 1.10 was electric
kjy2010 said:
There will be a new Super ROM out any day, call the "SuperHootchieCoochie ROM". Wait for it, cuz when it hits, it's gonna make ALL other ROMS obsolete!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whats this? Do tell...
MJ-12 said:
Whats this? Do tell...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you don't know about SHC rom then you're not worth it.
On a serious note... There is no need to flash every single day. If the rom is bugfree and/or there are no new sources then there's no reason to update it.
So chill back and wait for SuperHootchieCoochie ROM.
Do us a favor and ask such questions in the general area, keep this clean for development ...
+1 not only a rom oesnot need to be updated every day but cooks also have a life
Finally definitively not the good place to ask the question...
Sent from my A500 using XDA Premium App
CarpeNoctem said:
+1 not only a rom oesnot need to be updated every day but cooks also have a life
Finally definitively not the good place to ask the question...
Sent from my A500 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure about that. A bit of a grey area This is asking about development of a specific rom. Surely its only the devs in the dev section who will be able to answer this. Its not a tip for users, a theme or an app question he is asking. Chill abit with the 'this is not for this section'.
Anyway when are we getting GT 3.2
I tend to agree with the topic starter. Although I know the developer does a great job, having 4 or 5 different roms to support, makes things confusing, not only for the developer, but also for his followers.
They wonder, what rom should i take, why he switches from Acer to Asus to Galaxy to Xoom and then hops from one rom to another. It makes me think the developer also doesnt know what he wants. Shall i use the asus core or perhaps the acer core, and if that choice is made, he hops back to another core.....
Also, if developing that many different ROM's, what you end up with is a less polished result as when you stick to one dev. direction, which is - in my eyes all to clear as m-deejay's roms still have problems with random power off, wifi problems, and some more, while i do know roms with other kernels, which dont have those problems.
So instead of showing us how many different developments the developer can keep up with for 30-40%, i think he should stick to 1 or 2, and make those 2 100%, or as close as possible to a 100%.
Just my 2 cents......
virtuous alive. moderators please close this thread
How alive is virtual picasso?
I believe Virtuous hoochiecoochie can be alive, but applies the same to the other treads, i really doubt that, as still the wifi problems, the random power offs, random screen-freezes are still as bad (or good, depending on how much you mind) as several versions before.......
Virtuous roms are very unstable, id move on if I were you.
MOD: Please dont close this thread.
Cheers!
CheopsChefren said:
I tend to agree with the topic starter. Although I know the developer does a great job, having 4 or 5 different roms to support, makes things confusing, not only for the developer, but also for his followers.
They wonder, what rom should i take, why he switches from Acer to Asus to Galaxy to Xoom and then hops from one rom to another. It makes me think the developer also doesnt know what he wants. Shall i use the asus core or perhaps the acer core, and if that choice is made, he hops back to another core.....
Also, if developing that many different ROM's, what you end up with is a less polished result as when you stick to one dev. direction, which is - in my eyes all to clear as m-deejay's roms still have problems with random power off, wifi problems, and some more, while i do know roms with other kernels, which dont have those problems.
So instead of showing us how many different developments the developer can keep up with for 30-40%, i think he should stick to 1 or 2, and make those 2 100%, or as close as possible to a 100%.
Just my 2 cents......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as virtuous galaxy goes random reboots are a thing of the past since unity v2. From v3 onwards the kernels have been good. However unity v7 in VG 1.0.5 seems to have reverted back to old ways instead of going fwd. Its a shame thor wont release his kernel sources as this would greatly enhance the custom roms we have on here. I do agree that having so many ports can tend to confuse but from my hd2 days mdj works that way!
Sent from my GT-P7500 using XDA Premium App
m-deejay said:
virtuous alive. moderators please close this thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And 1 for closing this thread as this cant be constructive. Where would this acer forum be without devs like mdj? We have more choice than most of the other tablet owners on here. We have the chefs enhancing the stock option and we have mdj providing us with flavours from deifferent devices. That cant be bad can it? If the virtuous roms are too buggy then we all have the choice to stay clear. However there are many that prefer the custom options and can live with the bugs. We have choice in here not just from stock optimisations but custom mods from various devices. Thats must be a good. What we dont want is people starting to get on the chef and he leaves xda like most of the exp chefs all over xda are doing!
Sent from my GT-P7500 using XDA Premium App
Close This thread!
For example galaxy is more or less perfect, 3 small issues to fix, but what else should be updatet. So not much to do for mdj.
And no need to flash a new rom every day, I think. Don't change a running system.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
chuchikuchi rom ?
kjy2010 said:
There will be a new Super ROM out any day, call the "SuperHootchieCoochie ROM". Wait for it, cuz when it hits, it's gonna make ALL other ROMS obsolete!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
eh i want the super hootchikuchi rom jejeje XD XD lol
and now in serious, i want the next rom over xoom 3.2, and now i use the taboonay version but i want a remake over xoom
Close This thread! please¡¡
Peter.
MJ-12 said:
Whats this? Do tell...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There will be a small price you have to pay for it, approximately 1000,000 pesos. But it's worth it bro! It even comes with a hot secretary that will type for you........"wait for it"!
another 1 for closing
Case in point:
I bought both the Iconia and Transformer and had a tough time deciding which to open and keep. What made me choose the Iconia was the dev support in comparison. Lets realize without dev support our tabs, phones, etc. Wouldn't be functional or as fun!
If the dev of the rom says he's still developing, then case closed.
kjy2010 said:
There will be a small price you have to pay for it, approximately 1000,000 pesos. But it's worth it bro! It even comes with a hot secretary that will type for you........"wait for it"!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Emm, blonde or brunette flavour? Or is she modable, she can dye her hair according to taste
+1 for open +1 for mdj +1 for devs + 1 for VG 3.2 +1 for shc
MJ-12 said:
Emm, blonde or brunette flavour? Or is she modable, she can dye her hair according to taste
+1 for open +1 for mdj +1 for devs + 1 for VG 3.2 +1 for shc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and +1 for u to
she depends on DEVs skills
I have seen a lot of talk lately with people comparing the ICS development ROM's to Task 14.. I have been swapping back and forth almost daily between AOKP #23 and Task 14 Slim so here are my thoughts..
1st of all both are awesome ROM's that offer plusses and minuses depending on what each individual wants and needs.. These observations are based on MY wants and needs so opinions will vary.. The fact that Task 14, a HC 3.2 ROM even gets mentioned / compared to an ICS ROM speaks volumes about how good it is..
Things I like about AOKP #23:
--Browser hardware acceleration
--No screenshot soft key (I loathe that thing)
--ROM Control
--Ability to set # of homescreens
--Swipe to dismiss
Things I like about Task 14:
--Rock solid and stable
--Camera works for video chat
--Just as fast as ICS in many areas and faster in some
--Mini widgets
--Several awesome themes available
The AOKP is actually pretty stable for the most part and Roman and team have done an awesome job on it but remember it's a beta so there is issues and bugs at the time of this posting.. Task 14 is super rock solid and its really only limited by HC 3.2..
I honestly can't decide which I like better.. They both ROCK! I guess that's why I change between them daily..
A few AOKP issues I have is with apps and the screen.. Words with friends is a good example of this.. Also, the screen gets a little glitchy at times when viewing online images.. Nothing major and by no means a put down on AOKP...
I have had zero issues on Task 14 that are not widespread HC 3.2 related..
If you can live without the camera and are willing to experience a few minor bugs here and there then the AOKP may be for you.. If however you want rock solid with zero bugs, a working camera and a system that is just as fast then Task 14 may be for you..
These are MY thoughts and comparison of 2 kick a$$ ROM's... Thoughts and replies are welcome but please don't turn this thread into a pi$$ing match...
You're just asking for a pissing match. I'll just watch... for now...:sly:
If you can read this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
I hope not since they are both awesome ROM's...
I've tried ics, very fast and smooth without touchwiz is a godsend. There is only one 3g ics rom so I have not tried romanb's yet. 3g is a big deal to me. Other thing with isc is no proper USB/mass storage support. It does not show all files that I've downloaded from net except whatever files I transferred to tab. Camera is another big issue for me, or lack of. Video does not work also from the rom I tried. Some apps on market not supported also so cant update. That's my summary of isc. HC3.2 on the other hand is improving. I have not tried Task as again no 3g. I'm a big fan of Alterbridge and his Overcome roms. Been using his rom since the original Tab. His latest 2.3.0 soup up with pershoot kernel is more than great for me. ISC is great but for my daily usage, its not ready yet.
Sent from my GT-P7500 using XDA App
raqball said:
I hope not since they are both awesome ROM's...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just wait its coming bro...
If you can read this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
I do realize this is XDA but I guess I hope we all will act like adults and that this mini review will help anyone who can't choose between these 2 awesome ROM's.. Heck I'm having a hard time choosing.. The OP was made on Task 14 and this post is getting made on AOKP..
Good comparsion between the two. Personally, I use Task14 with b00sted's ICS theme. No ICS can compare to it right now, but once the camera issue is solved, ICS will be boss.
All us Task fans are hoping for a Task ICS ROM soon.
BTW, good thread OP.
A Task ICS ROM will be awesome once it comes.. I'm back on the AOKP for this morning as least..
I think we scared off the ones that would have made this a pissing match. Good.
BTW- nice OP.
If you can read this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
How can you compare Android 4.0 (No official release and by the way in Alpha state) and Android 3.2?
donniezazen said:
How can you compare Android 4.0 (No official release and by the way in Alpha state) and Android 3.2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He is comparing what is available today. The OP is well aware that ICS is in development but he is looking for a daily driver and was looking for others opinions on what we use.
Until ICS is official there is no way to do a 1 for 1 comparison.
donniezazen said:
How can you compare Android 4.0 (No official release and by the way in Alpha state) and Android 3.2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's easy.. I use them both daily and figured my post might help others who are on the fence or not sure which to use..
Anything can be compared.. Pinto -v- Corvette or Blonde -v- Brunette ect....
donniezazen said:
How can you compare Android 4.0 (No official release and by the way in Alpha state) and Android 3.2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Easy you try them both and yes ics is alpha but thats what is available now and is the point of this thread. I came to the same conclusion as the OP after using both kang versions. the arguably incremental improvement in smoothness does not outweigh the full functionality goodness of galaxytask
Adding Visidon even gives me face unlock features and with camera ics+ i get the camera panorama functionality on my galaxy task rom
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk
ICS ........... almost stable!
donniezazen said:
How can you compare Android 4.0 (No official release and by the way in Alpha state) and Android 3.2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even though it is supposed to be alpha (since the Camera mainly does not work and there are also some minor bugs), it is quite stable for daily use as I myself use it and the best part is there are some amazing customisation options ..... literally mind blowing!
Thanks for the review. Still haven't custom rom'd it up yet.
When does the official ics come out?
i have found that the battery in the latest ICS kangs (not the one on XDA as that doesnt get updated! but the one on rootzwiki) is by far lots better than any HC.
So indeed for an alpha release ICS is looking very good compare to an already establish HC rom.
So I can only imagine how good ICS will be when SS releases it...hopefully in April..
bit OT interesting that there are no leaks yet from samfirmware!
nandihno said:
i have found that the battery in the latest ICS kangs (not the one on XDA as that doesnt get updated! but the one on rootzwiki)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Romanbb is constantly updating the AOKP...
wtgserpant said:
Even though it is supposed to be alpha (since the Camera mainly does not work and there are also some minor bugs), it is quite stable for daily use as I myself use it and the best part is there are some amazing customisation options ..... literally mind blowing!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mind blowing? seriously? did you just come from using my Packard bell 286 from the back of my closest? Just kidding. But mind blowing compared to what? stock?
If you can read this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
Benzoman said:
mind blowing? seriously? did you just come from using my Packard bell 286 from the back of my closest? Just kidding. But mind blowing compared to what? stock?
If you can read this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol im with benzoman on this one...
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk
Benzoman said:
mind blowing? seriously? did you just come from using my Packard bell 286 from the back of my closest? Just kidding. But mind blowing compared to what? stock?
If you can read this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree as well... ICS is not mind blowing and is only slightly snappier than Taks 14 in some areas..
Usually, (for other devices of course), ICS roms that are developed from AOSP tend to be more stable, less buggy and better than CM9 roms, so im kind of curious why Atrix developers have decided to work on CM9, even thought its far from complete?
Just a question.
djluis48 said:
Usually, (for other devices of course), ICS roms that are developed from AOSP tend to be more stable, less buggy and better than CM9 roms, so im kind of curious why Atrix developers have decided to work on CM9, even thought its far from complete?
Just a question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
because CM9 is what we all want in the end.
djluis48 said:
Usually, (for other devices of course), ICS roms that are developed from AOSP tend to be more stable, less buggy and better than CM9 roms, so im kind of curious why Atrix developers have decided to work on CM9, even thought its far from complete?
Just a question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not 100% but I think the developers need something from the moto/nvidia which is why the rom was ported from the photon and not just built From the ground up .
Again not 100%
Sent from the Atrix of Chuck Norris.
djluis48 said:
Usually, (for other devices of course), ICS roms that are developed from AOSP tend to be more stable, less buggy and better than CM9 roms, so im kind of curious why Atrix developers have decided to work on CM9, even thought its far from complete?
Just a question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NVidia won't release the drivers and sources required to accomplish this, so a 1/2 ass port is all that can be done at the moment. This has nothing to do with the devs. They are giving us the best they can with what they have right now.
djluis48 said:
Usually, (for other devices of course), ICS roms that are developed from AOSP tend to be more stable, less buggy and better than CM9 roms, so im kind of curious why Atrix developers have decided to work on CM9, even thought its far from complete?
Just a question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please open eyes before posting. Development are working hard and doing what they can.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
JayRolla said:
Please open eyes before posting. Development are working hard and doing what they can.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not saying that they arent working hard, just asking why they choosing CM9 instead of AOSP 4.0, just a simple question. And ponting out that builds based on AOSP seems to be more solid and stable than builds based on CM9, mostly because CM9 itself its still not from complete
Sent from my MB860 using XDA
Also, IIRC, they're borrowing heavily from CM7 for our current CM9 builds. I believe we'll see more options when we finally get official source and drivers in Q3.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
CaelanT said:
NVidia won't release the drivers and sources required to accomplish this, so a 1/2 ass port is all that can be done at the moment. This has nothing to do with the devs. They are giving us the best they can with what they have right now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please read the above before commenting again! If you had read it the first time you would not have posted what you did below!.............Or maybe you still would have, who knows!!! You can program all you want for an AOSP ROM, but without device specific drivers you can never optimize for any one device. Simple as this, for any ICS on the Atrix, whether AOSP, CM9, MIUI, or whatever, you still need device drivers. Try running your NVidia graphics card in your computer without a driver................yeah, see what I mean (but then again you might like 640 x 480!)!
djluis48 said:
Not saying that they arent working hard, just asking why they choosing CM9 instead of AOSP 4.0, just a simple question. And ponting out that builds based on AOSP seems to be more solid and stable than builds based on CM9, mostly because CM9 itself its still not from complete
Sent from my MB860 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
BTW...........Please link the AOSP 4.0 builds for the Atrix you are referring to!
CaelanT said:
Please read the above before commenting again! If you had read it the first time you would not have posted what you did below!.............Or maybe you still would have, who knows!!! You can program all you want for an AOSP ROM, but without device specific drivers you can never optimize for any one device. Simple as this, for any ICS on the Atrix, whether AOSP, CM9, MIUI, or whatever, you still need device drivers. Try running your NVidia graphics card in your computer without a driver................yeah, see what I mean (but then again you might like 640 x 480!)!
BTW...........Please link the AOSP 4.0 builds for the Atrix you are referring to!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're rude.
Purple Drama Llama said:
You're rude.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No! I already answered the question earlier in the thread, but OP obviously is not reading and persists.
Both my posts were quite nice actually!
Bye!
BTW, why no comment about this post being rude?:
JayRolla said:
Please open eyes before posting. Development are working hard and doing what they can.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CaelanT said:
BTW...........Please link the AOSP 4.0 builds for the Atrix you are referring to![/B]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Woops, i forgot to tell that i was refering to other devices AOSP 4.0 ROMS, but if you are as inteligent as you seems to be, you should have known that because the Atrix actually doesn't have any rom coded from AOPS 4.0, at least on this forum.
The roms i was refering to was ICS Passion and ICS Euforia, both made by the same developer, Neobuddy, made for the Samsung Vibrant, a 1ghz phone, with 512mb for ram, without official drivrrs released, and the rom is more stable than the current Atrix ICS builds (no offend, i recongnize the guys are doing a great job making it happen), and almost as smooth as a the builds, and that phone is in a similar condition driver-related, that its, without any drivers being released. Thats why my doubt came, why the developers chiosed CM9 as a base, even thought it isnt really stable yet, and not completed, and why builds made from AOSP 4.0 tend to be more stable?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA
djluis48 said:
Woops, i forgot to tell that i was refering to other devices AOSP 4.0 ROMS, but if you are as inteligent as you seems to be, you should have known that because the Atrix actually doesn't have any rom coded from AOPS 4.0, at least on this forum.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And that's why I asked you to link them. You are comparing AOSP ROM's on other devices to CM9 on other devices. Because you see something run more smoothly on one device, does not directly mean it will run smoothly on another device. In any event, your question was answered in as far as there are drivers and source that the devs do not have in order to make any ICS based ROM's work optimally on the Atrix. If I had to hazard a guess as to why the devs are using CM9 as a base, it would be because the groundwork has been laid for them. The Atrix doesn't have an army of devs, so we get a smaller mix of options with ROM's.
CaelanT said:
And that's why I asked you to link them. You are comparing AOSP ROM's on other devices to CM9 on other devices. Because you see something run more smoothly on one device, does not directly mean it will run smoothly on another device. In any event, your question was answered in as far as there are drivers and source that the devs do not have in order to make any ICS based ROM's work optimally on the Atrix. If I had to hazard a guess as to why the devs are using CM9 as a base, it would be because the groundwork has been laid for them. The Atrix doesn't have an army of devs, so we get a smaller mix of options with ROM's.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The OP was asking why the Atrix doesn't have AOSP ROM's.. so you.. ask him to link them?
I've been lurking around the forums since the release of this phone and you have got to be one of my favorite posters so far, give me a good laugh every time.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Celidonius said:
The OP was asking why the Atrix doesn't have AOSP ROM's.. so you.. ask him to link them?
I've been lurking around the forums since the release of this phone and you have got to be one of my favorite posters so far, give me a good laugh every time.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wrote something about that yesterday but in the mist of trying to add a pic xda app fc'd.
+1
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
I kind of think I get what the OP is asking. He's asking why build a really souped up race car where as a regular car is just as fine. Seems like he's not picky and he would be content with anything stable vs anything available now. But that's another thread isn't it?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA
Receiving a used Xoom soon and was reading many many forums on Xoom roms and want to see what people are using. I would like ICS of course, not really concerned with overclocking. I run AOKP on my Galaxy Nexus and never have looked back. But not sure the best route for the Xoom.. I know ROMS are personal preference but still want to get an idea to see who's leading the pack and packing most of the latest features and addons.
Sorry if I missed any roms.
Thanks Guys
Androider4Life
highflyin128 said:
Receiving a used Xoom soon and was reading many many forums on Xoom roms and want to see what people are using. I would like ICS of course, not really concerned with overclocking. I run AOKP on my Galaxy Nexus and never have looked back. But not sure the best route for the Xoom.. I know ROMS are personal preference but still want to get an idea to see who's leading the pack and packing most of the latest features and addons.
Sorry if I missed any roms.
Thanks Guys
Androider4Life
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be honest, most people use EoS, I think.
However since a couple of weeks there has been a huge battery sucker in it
CM is also one of the most popular roms, but I prefer EOS or the Bugless Beast ROM.
However the latter has come to a standstill due to some personal issues of the developer, still: it runs amazingly smooth without need to over clock!
All the other roms are okay, I guess, but I can't help you with those
Just my two cents ;-)
AOKP for me I have it on my Galaxy nexus
2003vstrom said:
AOKP for me I have it on my Galaxy nexus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats what I run on my GNex too but didnt see many posts on the Xoom so wasnt sure if it was up to par as the GNex version.
AOKP has been my daily on the Xoom for a month or two now, runs like a dream.
I have been running AOKP on my XOOM for some time now. I really like all the extra features. However, I think that what the Xoom really lacks in development is a Kernel. I have been spoiled with Faux123 on my Galaxy Nexus. But the kernels I have been using on the XOOM have been outdated. Anyone have a kernel recommendation?
Bl4ckpheniX said:
I have been running AOKP on my XOOM for some time now. I really like all the extra features. However, I think that what the Xoom really lacks in development is a Kernel. I have been spoiled with Faux123 on my Galaxy Nexus. But the kernels I have been using on the XOOM have been outdated. Anyone have a kernel recommendation?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AOKP ships with stock kernel right? EOS and Rogue are usually on top of keeping their kernels up to date. EOS kernel is tiamat and there's a thread somewhere around here for it and Rogue.
Edit: Better yet get this app: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.s0up.goomanager
Its GooMamager. Browse files and under kernels there's are a ton that claim "Compatibility". I think the ICS kernel is very unified. Goomanager will also notify you when your ROM is updated,and as long as you have an open script recovery, Goo will download the Update and make a backup in Recovery (with rename prior to backup) wipe/wipe cache and install new update then reboot almost like an ota. So easy now. Also notifies when gapps updates. I guess its the new ROM Manager.
Anyways at the bottom of the kernel list is Rogue with what looks like an up to date kernel.
EOS team rom for sure without doubt. Which xoom model?
Sent from my MZ601 using Tapatalk 2
wesamothman said:
EOS team rom for sure without doubt. Which xoom model?
Sent from my MZ601 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
XOOM FAMILY EDITION. dont have it yet to get the model number.
Thanks for taking on this project, let me know if you need beta testers.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
highflyin128 said:
XOOM FAMILY EDITION. dont have it yet to get the model number.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe that any of ROMs here would work with Xoom Family Edition.
maajstor said:
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe that any of ROMs here would work with Xoom Family Edition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please dont say that... I hope I didnt waste my money on something
After some research i guess I'm screwed... @$?#$%?$
This is NOT development!
Do not post threads like this here
Thread moved
FNM
Yes. As far as I know, mz505 can be rooted. But these roms were not tested with it.
You can still root it. Also try to flash the rom of mz604 on it from team EOS since it is wifi only. Might work. Or just enjoy a rooted device.
Sent from my MZ601 using Tapatalk 2
wesamothman said:
Yes. As far as I know, mz505 can be rooted. But these roms were not tested with it.
You can still root it. Also try to flash the rom of mz604 on it from team EOS since it is wifi only. Might work. Or just enjoy a rooted device.
Sent from my MZ601 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So a little ray of light lol
Sent from my AOKP Galaxy Nexus using RootzWiki... Unicorn Power!!
kennyglass123 said:
This is NOT development!
Do not post threads like this here
Thread moved
FNM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wasn't paying attention to what section I was in... My bad
Sent from my AOKP Galaxy Nexus using RootzWiki... Unicorn Power!!
EOS doesn't have theme chooser, tho, right? I'm running stock non-rooted and love it. Idk why but I just enjoy being stock. The only reason I'd root is that Holo Orange theme... it looks sick!
highflyin128 said:
Please dont say that... I hope I didnt waste my money on something
After some research i guess I'm screwed... @$?#$%?$
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're screwed.
There are no roms to that work on the Xoom Family Edition, or the Xoom 2 family.
solarnz said:
You're screwed.
There are no roms to that work on the Xoom Family Edition, or the Xoom 2 family.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why is that? different file structure, kernel, etc.
dkahs23 said:
Why is that? different file structure, kernel, etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
solarnz said:
You're screwed.
There are no roms to that work on the Xoom Family Edition, or the Xoom 2 family.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is the demand not there for the dev's to work on it? Are they roms in progress?
Whats the Best GB Kernel for running stock?
Probably the last one from here, released in March....http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=26936028&postcount=4
Most of us are on ICS... smoother and better battery life. The Kernals have the emmc brick/bug removed, or you can fully wipe on Abyss 4.2 anyway. Why GB?
Towserspvm2000 said:
Probably the last one from here, released in March....http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=26936028&postcount=4
Most of us are on ICS... smoother and better battery life. The Kernals have the emmc brick/bug removed, or you can fully wipe on Abyss 4.2 anyway. Why GB?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would LOVE ICS, But I have issues with scrolling side to side and up and down. In menus, Apps, Pictures, launchers..
Its not lagging its just acting up, Does the same thing on the AT&T one as well.
Arobase40 said:
Sorry, but I didn't figure out if you were talking about kernel or ROM, and about International Note or AT&T Note... ^^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The international, But I was just saying I have the same issue with the screen on ICS with both AT&T and N7000
Notecore from the old darkyrom is treating me fine. Easily getting a full day of hardcore use. Doesnt do 240dpi, a shame, but doesnt have any sod's or wake locks..
I was referring as I HAVE THE SAME ISSUE on BOTH of the phones. The International note is my MAIN note, But I was just saying I have the SAME touch screen issue with both
Speedmod.
Sent via carrier pigeon
Speedmod ics kernel.
hyelton said:
Whats the Best GB Kernel for running stock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
franco.kernel #10 has been working great for me. Can be overclocked with Tegrak as well.
@Arobase40
What's so hard to understand? By "kernel" you can assume the OP means KERNEL. Must you cause an argument in every thread? RE-READ THE OP POST! QUIT CAUSING PROBLEMS IN THIS FORUM!!!
kraz
Sent from my Beautiful, White GT-N7000 using xda premium
Its not the launcher! it does it.in settings launcher. Quicpic. Gallery. every app
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Having owned of both the 7000 and 717... Franco-rom is my pick..... my basic recommendation is if you need stability and dependability stay on GB..... If you are ok with some bugs then ICS is fun but still there are bugs.... in 2 weeks (by 7-12) all the ICS roms will have all the code necessary resolve all the issues everyone is griping about. Tmobile will release their version and it is coming out with ICS, so it stands to reason if one phone has ICS then all the others will access to the issues that are plaguing our leaked ROMs/kernels.
Best Kernel imho is still the Franco..... he is responsive to resolving issues and he has done way more work on the kernel almost anyone one else.
To the others in the thread. Play nice... be respectful... we are here to help each other........ oka1 (moderator)
Best Kernel>Franco and Speed mod(Choose yours)
As far as kernel goes I have been testing a lot of them lately and found out that if you want good scrolling and performance on stock GB you can get speedmod as it provides 804MB RAM for your system and it has no scrolling issues if you are using TOUCHWIZ, but you won't get features like custom boot animation, for that you can choose franco kernel v10 and it works great with franco kernel application.
MOD Notice
Please keep this thread on topic. If anybody has a issue with a post, please report it and dont get into a open argument. The moderation team is here to resolve them. Any further off topic/insulting posts will be treated as failure to cooperate with a moderator and the appropriate infraction will be issued.