Related
Hey guys, I just benchmarked my Hero(Telus) ... VillainRom 6.2.0 ... used the app from the market(blue table graph icon), just wondering what everyone else is being benched at??
The only thing that is backgrounded is the Desk Clock that comes with Rosie.
117.164 total graphics score
161.830 total CPU score
118.092 total memory score
37.326 total file system score
This means nothing if you don't post your CPU speed.
havn't touched cpu ... ROM and radio only updates ... not using setCPU, or the other popular overclocker, or any for that matter.
Graphic 119.479836
CPU 185.26137
Memory 139.53342
Filesystem 35.040806
bulltronStudios said:
havn't touched cpu ... ROM and radio only updates ... not using setCPU, or the other popular overclocker, or any for that matter.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, so what is the default CPU settings for that ROM, then?
Well, the thread is for a particular rom, so, everyone should have same default for the rom, check google if your that curious
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
LOL! Ok.
.
bulltronStudios said:
Hey guys, I just benchmarked my Hero(Telus) ... VillainRom 6.2.0 ... used the app from the market(blue table graph icon), just wondering what everyone else is being benched at??
The only thing that is backgrounded is the Desk Clock that comes with Rosie.
117.164 total graphics score
161.830 total CPU score
118.092 total memory score
37.326 total file system score
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would you be spamming the forum with YET another benchmark thread, while there are quite a few of them already; post in those.
adwinp said:
Why would you be spamming the forum with YET another benchmark thread, while there are quite a few of them already; post in those.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
guess i didn't cruise to page 400 in the forums ... figured mabye alot of ppl were downloading this ROM ... it does seem to be the fan favorite. and perhaps save people looking 399 pages past this one ...
Graphic: 146.38194
CPU: 227.27559
Memory: 153.31569
Filesys: 35.0106
HTC Hero, [email protected](Max)/352MHz(Min)
bulltronStudios said:
guess i didn't cruise to page 400 in the forums ... figured mabye alot of ppl were downloading this ROM ... it does seem to be the fan favorite. and perhaps save people looking 399 pages past this one ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I guess if people are willing to download a new rom, they would like to look into all their options, not only one. For that matter, this thread (found on page 3) is much more helpful:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=656818
What's the point of having 20 people posting their results with the same rom on the same hardware? Are you going for a statistics? And your argument about people having to scroll around is completely pointless, because your thread won't stay on page 1 forever, you know? So people *will* have to scroll again to see it...
DeXa said:
Graphic: 146.38194
CPU: 227.27559
Memory: 153.31569
Filesys: 35.0106
HTC Hero, [email protected](Max)/352MHz(Min)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now, THAT's meaningful!
DeXa said:
Graphic: 146.38194
CPU: 227.27559
Memory: 153.31569
Filesys: 35.0106
HTC Hero, [email protected](Max)/352MHz(Min)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what kind of heat are you putting off at 748??
what are you using for overclock? setCPU?
killer4o said:
Well, I guess if people are willing to download a new rom, they would like to look into all their options, not only one. For that matter, this thread (found on page 3) is much more helpful:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=656818
What's the point of having 20 people posting their results with the same rom on the same hardware? Are you going for a statistics? And your argument about people having to scroll around is completely pointless, because your thread won't stay on page 1 forever, you know? So people *will* have to scroll again to see it...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
all i was saying was, in response to first dude, marinerb ... was I did NOT put aything on my phone, also, that i had STOCK rom ... if people have overclocks, good, post em, i dont, so i didn't list it.... looking for comparison, no need to be nazi's about it ... so, yeah... just let the thread die.
bulltronStudios said:
what kind of heat are you putting off at 748??
what are you using for overclock? setCPU?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't notice more heat than usual. I only notice heat when charging and it's from the battery. Battery life is better than with stock settings. I use SetCPU, no profiles, ondemand governor and ben39_nobfs_noCC_no-whining kernel.
Thread Moved.
DeXa said:
Graphic: 146.38194
CPU: 227.27559
Memory: 153.31569
Filesys: 35.0106
HTC Hero, [email protected](Max)/352MHz(Min)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is yours stable at 748 if you run the setcpu stress tester for a minute or two?
if so then that's cool - I might have to try that speed too. I know mine locks up instantly at 780mHz more or less, but solid as a rock at 730. I have a feeling I tried 748 and it slowed to a crawl in the stress test and became really unresponsive yet not fully locking up... which to me makes that speed much worse than keeping it a little slower with 100% stability.
EDIT: stress testing 748 right now and it's still working ok... so maybe I stress tested a higher speed instead? running at basically 750mHz is freakin amazing for our little heroes if we can keep them running like that for the next couple of years
update: stress tested my phone at 748mHz results: lasted for 112725 ms before I exited the test with no errors! This little hero is so amazing!
EDIT: whoops - just reset itself LoL.... damn, I hope it boots up ok since I got cocky and set it to boot with the 748 top speed.... damn...
But I'll try it again - you've got me curious now
I have not stress tested the device but it runs stable for a couple of days now. No reboots and no lockups. The devices are somehow different some cannot run at 748 others can. Mine is even stable at 768Mhz but I i suffer less battery life with that setting, so I leave it 748 and everything is ok.
Dexa can you link me that kernel? I'm running ben39_nobfs_no-whining kernel clocked at 738mhz stable with stress testing and I'm curious about the noCC part that you're running. Thanks!
Ah never mind I found it; there was an updated version.
Anyone else getting 3550 and above on quadrant standard overclocked to 1.1 ghz?
This is kp's rom.
UPDATE: Now im getting around 4200 on cm7 prebeta 2 with the built in oc and it feels alot smoother!
No! My highest was 303x!
My highest is always ~2900
3600 here faux and custom hack system
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
4700, and only running one core!
TechnoNeto said:
Anyone else getting 3550 and above on quadrant standard overclocked to 1.1 ghz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sadly on stock when I first got the phone I would get over 4000 but now with GB and a 1.1 overclock I only get up to 3600. Is it really that far off on performance because it isn't a final build or is the final build going to be like this?
How is it you were getting 4000 or 4700 on quadrant standard?
BravoMotorola said:
Sadly on stock when I first got the phone I would get over 4000 but now with GB and a 1.1 overclock I only get up to 3600. Is it really that far off on performance because it isn't a final build or is the final build going to be like this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it is in beta so we could still see much improvement also you were getting that on quadrant or antutu?
mramirezusa said:
3600 here faux and custom hack system
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same as me is it saying that you are oc to 1.2 as mine does?
J-man67 said:
No! My highest was 303x!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
make sure you have set cpu to 1.1 min and max
hey guys, big news! benchmarks don't mean anything in reality.
my best "In Use" score is 3196. by in use I mean I have all the programs running I would have normally so I got a lot of junk running in the background. I have yet to kill everything and see what I can get with that.
dLo GSR said:
hey guys, big news! benchmarks don't mean anything in reality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You felt the need to express this why? This wasn't in the Q&A section as do benchmarks mean anything. It's a post about your scores not about people trying to prove their tech hierarchy.
dLo GSR said:
hey guys, big news! benchmarks don't mean anything in reality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Neither do 1/4 mile or 0 to 60 times, but they are fun to throw around.
I got a 3600 "in-use" benchmark, with max and min set to 1.1. With max at 1.1 and min still at .2, I still got 3200, which is not bad.
You seriously got 4000+ while on the phone's original stock system and everything??
Mine feels so much faster and snappier now on GB with the faux kernel and everything..
Tao_Man said:
Neither do 1/4 mile or 0 to 60 times, but they are fun to throw around.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
very true and in response to first post i get around 3330+ with most of my apps going but i have both min and max set to highest in set cpu
As does mine feel faster on gingerbread
Tao_Man said:
my best "In Use" score is 3196. by in use I mean I have all the programs running I would have normally so I got a lot of junk running in the background. I have yet to kill everything and see what I can get with that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the way I test also. I'm around 3000 with all the normal apps running that I leave running and min and max CPU speeds kept where I use them. It feels very smooth!
I have an atrix benchmark thread!
\/
i can't seem to pass 2800 running stock
I updated the kernel to run 1520mhz on P5110 wifi.
Its running smooth at that with 1.400v
Can more be unlocked ?
Im willing to try find max.
Off topic.... Do you change only kernel, or you flashed compleet aopk rom?
Sent from my GT-P5100 using Tapatalk 2
matasar said:
I updated the kernel to run 1520mhz on P5110 wifi.
Its running smooth at that with 1.400v
Can more be unlocked ?
Im willing to try find max.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's already beyond the Max. You can't oc it anymore than what you have. I'm surprised it doesn't lock up and freeze at anything higher than 1.42.
scottx . said:
That's already beyond the Max. You can't oc it anymore than what you have. I'm surprised it doesn't lock up and freeze at anything higher than 1.42.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So that is absolute max ?
There is no way in heaven to unlock more, its impossible and no use to ask any more questions at all about it ?
Totally absolute no chance that anyone can do it then...
I was a good overclocker before, soldering voltmods with magnifying glass on gfx and mb and doing GDDR timings optimizations step by step with bios flash for every change.
There was always more even when everyone said you cant do any more.
But as you say i have reached max (even beyond max)
Thank you.
(And no im not trying to be a smartass, i just heard "NO" way to many times to listen...the difference btw 1.0ghz to 1.5ghz is ENORMOUS so i just wanted more)
matasar said:
So that is absolute max ?
There is no way in heaven to unlock more, its impossible and no use to ask any more questions at all about it ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm actually surprised the OMAP hasn't shut itself down with all the clock and voltage protection stuff it has.
Here's the slick sheet for the OMAP 44xx that we run in the tablet: http://www.ti.com/lit/ml/swpt034b/swpt034b.pdf
I couldn't find the actual technical manual for it, but I didn't search hard enough.
Buy a faster tablet.
So its made for 1ghz and above, according to pdf.
So we will see tablets with same hardware running 1.5 and depending on cooling and so on.
it aslo seems to handle alot more then its offering, like 20mp cam and so.
And scott if i wanted the fastest then i would pay alot more, so i rather overclock.
you overclock also so i dont understand your comments at all.
I overclock but..
I'm not asking for more like you.
so i cant ask anything here ?
then this forum sure is not for me!
i will find a more helpful place then, see you.
4430
do we have a 4430 dual core in the tab 2 7" or a 4460 it would be nice if it is the 4460
the OMAP4430 operates at up to 1 GHz, while
the OMAP4460 operates at up to 1+ GHz
So I was wondering about the truth behind the risks of frying your cpu through overclocking or the chip itself degrading faster over time, and if there are such risks do they apply to a simple 2.5 ghz overclocking ?
There isn't any risk like that, unless you are using extremely high voltage, or are at terribly hot place.
I have tested all the overclockable kernels, and haven't found a single one which is steady at 2.6 or 2.8 GHz. Only Faux's kernel at 2490 MHz is stable.
Don't be scared, there's no risk.
PS: I personally use Performance governor by the way, so the CPU is always at max frequency, against all advice I keep using that for past three years, never had a problem, and you can understand where I live the temperature reaches extremely high in summer, so...
devilsdouble said:
There isn't any risk like that, unless you are using extremely high voltage, or are at terribly hot place.
I have tested all the overclockable kernels, and haven't found a single one which is steady at 2.6 or 2.8 GHz. Only Faux's kernel at 2490 MHz is stable.
Don't be scared, there's no risk.
PS: I personally use Performance governor by the way, so the CPU is always at max frequency, against all advice I keep using that for past three years, never had a problem, and you can understand where I live the temperature reaches extremely high in summer, so...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's actually comforting I too am using fauxclock and I live in Egypt so the temperature gets pretty high here, but I'm constantly monitoring the cpu's temperature so I will give the 2.5 ghz overclock a try for a while and see how it goes.
MohamedOMostafa said:
That's actually comforting I too am using fauxclock and I live in Egypt so the temperature gets pretty high here, but I'm constantly monitoring the cpu's temperature so I will give the 2.5 ghz overclock a try for a while and see how it goes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah do that. Just to see if the OC is stable run that damn Antutu benchmark. If the device doesn't reboot/stuck then OC is stable
Best of luck.
devilsdouble said:
Yeah do that. Just to see if the OC is stable run that damn Antutu benchmark. If the device doesn't reboot/stuck then OC is stable
Best of luck.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the first thing I did actually
MohamedOMostafa said:
That's the first thing I did actually
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha ha. Good. That's on Faux right? I got almost same score (44.7k) when I was checking.
Now if you want more then flash one of those 2.6 or 2.8 GHz kernels, and do the test, and message me if Antutu finishes the benchmark even once
devilsdouble said:
Ha ha. Good. That's on Faux right? I got almost same score (44.7k) when I was checking.
Now if you want more then flash one of those 2.6 or 2.8 GHz kernels, and do the test, and message me if Antutu finishes the benchmark even once
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
will do.
If you want higher you should try out Ultimate Kernel. Although it is removed from XDA, you can still find it on some foreign language site. It's the highest and most stable OC kernel I have used (3.0GHz).
Graffiti Exploit said:
If you want higher you should try out Ultimate Kernel. Although it is removed from XDA, you can still find it on some foreign language site. It's the highest and most stable OC kernel I have used (3.0GHz).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3.0 GHz
any benchmark screenshots ??
Graffiti Exploit said:
If you want higher you should try out Ultimate Kernel. Although it is removed from XDA, you can still find it on some foreign language site. It's the highest and most stable OC kernel I have used (3.0GHz).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, just found the topic, and it's mentioned that the topic was close due to non-compliance with the GNU GPLv2 and XDA forum rules, now what's the former thing?
Anyone has the latest version, if it's still updated outside XDA? Want to try it.
djak272 said:
3.0 GHz
any benchmark screenshots ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry cleaned up my screenshots folder as it was taking up a lot of space. Besides Antutu has been constantly getting updates so it may not be accurate.
devilsdouble said:
Hmm, just found the topic, and it's mentioned that the topic was close due to non-compliance with the GNU GPLv2 and XDA forum rules, now what's the former thing?
Anyone has the latest version, if it's still updated outside XDA? Want to try it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know if this is allowed but here it is.
v72
http://www.android-hilfe.de/custom-...ernel-kitkat-tw-only-ultimate-kernel-v72.html
v73
https://www.androidsource.club/foru...kernel-ultimate-kernel-v73-galaxy-note-3.html
Last one I used was v63. So do test it out more because I cannot vouch for the updates. But based from experience, I have never gotten an unstable update from that kernel.
Graffiti Exploit said:
Sorry cleaned up my screenshots folder as it was taking up a lot of space. Besides Antutu has been constantly getting updates so it may not be accurate.
I don't know if this is allowed but here it is.
v72
http://www.android-hilfe.de/custom-...ernel-kitkat-tw-only-ultimate-kernel-v72.html
v73
https://www.androidsource.club/foru...kernel-ultimate-kernel-v73-galaxy-note-3.html
Last one I used was v63. So do test it out more because I cannot vouch for the updates. But based from experience, I have never gotten an unstable update from that kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot for the link mate. Downloaded and flashed v73, but I can't get it past the stock clock rate of 2265 MHz! I mean I have tried to set higher frequency than that in S Tweaks, even downloaded Trickstar, SetCPU, but the it'd just stuck at 2265 MHz! I can go lower than 2265 but not higher! Weird!
devilsdouble said:
Thanks a lot for the link mate. Downloaded and flashed v73, but I can't get it past the stock clock rate of 2265 MHz! I mean I have tried to set higher frequency than that in S Tweaks, even downloaded Trickstar, SetCPU, but the it'd just stuck at 2265 MHz! I can go lower than 2265 but not higher! Weird!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it comes with 2 apps for customization. You apply frequency on the first one and open the other and select apply changes. I'm not sure if it was this kernel or was it AEL. Lol. Anyways good luck. Maybe your ROM doesn't support a certain "stuff". I'm sorry but I really forgot about those terminologies. You can read up on the closed thread if you want. I'm sure you'll have a clue or on that link I gave you. *Google Translate ftw*
I want to learn how I can modify kernel to adjust clock speeds. wt88047 redmi 2 . If anyone can detail the steps it would be great
Thank you
jsidney96 said:
I want to learn how I can modify kernel to adjust clock speeds. wt88047 redmi 2 . If anyone can detail the steps it would be great
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overclock dont work on redmi 2, all overclocks are fake
NaassomDourado said:
Overclock dont work on redmi 2, all overclocks are fake
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, except GPU overclock by me and Ashish94, the true 620mhz and the TurboClock 465T increase ~35% the gaming performance, games like asphalt 8 will run at 8 or 9 fps higher with the Overclock
TecnoTailsPlays said:
Yep, except GPU overclock by me and Ashish94, the true 620mhz and the TurboClock 465T increase ~35% the gaming performance, games like asphalt 8 will run at 8 or 9 fps higher with the Overclock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can select upto 1.8ghz on the zetsubo kernel , thats fake??
It feels smoother once overclocked.........
jsidney96 said:
You can select upto 1.8ghz on the zetsubo kernel , thats fake??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fake
TecnoTailsPlays said:
Fake
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont believe it, atleast tell me the fake steps
Those kernels heats up and locks up if i set too high cpu clk..... I know it can be overclocked..
jsidney96 said:
I want to learn how I can modify kernel to adjust clock speeds. wt88047 redmi 2 . If anyone can detail the steps it would be great
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i'd suggest you to try lateautumn kernel, it boosts your CPU freq to 1.8ghz and it seems like it worked for me, battery drained so fast tho...
rufuskid said:
i'd suggest you to try lateautumn kernel, it boosts your CPU freq to 1.8ghz and it seems like it worked for me, battery drained so fast tho...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I want to learn how to do it....
jsidney96 said:
I dont believe it, atleast tell me the fake steps
Those kernels heats up and locks up if i set too high cpu clk..... I know it can be overclocked..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look, I'm tired from explaining that CPU overcloks are fake, just freaking search about snapdragon 410, the processor is LOCKED, PLL overclock is not possible without external source file help, only Moto g3 osprey have this file, when somebody port's that file to our source, I will be wrong
Also if you don't even know how to overclock a device, how can you say that I'm wrong?
jsidney96 said:
I want to learn how to do it....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
download kernel adiutor and you will have the option there (with the custom kernel applied)
TecnoTailsPlays said:
Look, I'm tired from explaining that CPU overcloks are fake, just freaking search about snapdragon 410, the processor is LOCKED, PLL overclock is not possible without external source file help, only Moto g3 osprey have this file, when somebody port's that file to our source, I will be wrong
Also if you don't even know how to overclock a device, how can you say that I'm wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am sorry . Its just i couldnt believe it .... I will try to do something useful
jsidney96 said:
I am sorry . Its just i couldnt believe it .... I will try to do something useful
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Something useful? Why don't you try arm64 aosp caf by pirej and see how the rom is? we need more people to log some bugs like wifi 10m off, etc
TecnoTailsPlays said:
Something useful? Why don't you try arm64 aosp caf by pirej and see how the rom is? we need more people to log some bugs like wifi 10m off, etc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
saw this.....
https://forum.xda-developers.com/redmi-2/help/compiling-kernel-development-overclock-t3538273
I am having exams now..... i will jumb right back in once exams are over..... i am already running pirej's rom on 2014818....
i am still learning
jsidney96 said:
saw this.....
https://forum.xda-developers.com/redmi-2/help/compiling-kernel-development-overclock-t3538273
I am having exams now..... i will jumb right back in once exams are over..... i am already running pirej's rom on 2014818....
i am still learning
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At that time I din't know anything about this phone, becouse I just had buyed it, then I started spending 8hrs in the computer to study kernels, redmi 2, and all related to source, android, etc. Then I started making overclocks, and after 2 weeks of testing I completed my results and overclock was fake.
It's like school or college, you need to study to understand
Which ROM is best to be used with late autumn kernel. When I install late autumn kernel on any ROM ,the camera stops working.
LuanHalaiko said:
Look, I'm tired from explaining that CPU overcloks are fake, just freaking search about snapdragon 410, the processor is LOCKED, PLL overclock is not possible without external source file help, only Moto g3 osprey have this file, when somebody port's that file to our source, I will be wrong
Also if you don't even know how to overclock a device, how can you say that I'm wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds like a stage I'm currently going through, are there any recommended resources for learning?
The main direction is to reverse the kernel code for the purpose of changing system settings