Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the OPPO A72 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
48mp is more a waste of time then anything else unless you need the resolution for print. In other modes there are software issues. No voice activated shutter, clunky manual controls, hilarious ai scene recognition. it takes nice really nice photos when you get things right. Zoom is ok. For the price it's not bad.
Related
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Razer Phone come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
I would prefer to have left 3.5 stars as the camera is just average. Everything seems a little blurry when zoomed in. Through editing every single photo you can bring it up to a 4 star image but people don't want that. I don't want that. I just do it because I want to enjoy the photo after I took it. Razer step up please.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Seems like every Moto phone I've had takes garbage photos on the stock software. Root & install Gcam and instantly 100x better photos. That being said this phones camera quality is like all the other G phones before it.
I think the pictures are decent. One perk is the front camera and it having a flash. That is something found in a little more pricier makes and models.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Realme 3 Pro come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Realme 3 Pro come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Realme has a really good camera but edge detection , exposure and the EIS needs improvement badly ....
I'd say Realme's camera is satisfactory enough for outdoor landscape scenes and food, but when I tried to snap an A4 brochure from around 50cm distance & around 45-55degrees from the paper's face, the text in the resulting photo is smudged and hard to read. That's literally my first photo after unboxing, and it's daytime indoor with very good ceiling & window lights. I haven't tried the same situation after receiving 2 software updates.
Another situation is some product photo session. Daytime indoor with bright enough ceiling light only (no professional lighting setup) and flash turned off. The results are good enough, but too much over-processing. I had to decrease the contrast and saturation half the slider to get the correct color. Also, for some reason white reflective objects (like beads) got really soft edges. Other colors in the same photo have sharp edges.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
The 24MP camera puts out some decent photos but does not have an option to shoot RAW. Would have been nice to see that option. You also have a wide shot mode with uses an 8MP camera and produces pretty terrible quality images.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Huawei Mate 40 Pro come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Huawei Mate 40 Pro come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I too tried the image quality of the pics taken in my new Huawei Mate 40 Pro which I bought a month ago from Xcite. To be frank, I was really surprised with the photos. Didn't really expect these kind of image quality.
Why photos are not will stabilized?
The phone quality is truly astounding!
maybe some pictures are nice, but they never solved the portrait mode, only the first update was good, and never again, the portrait mode in super mode was like a dslr at the beginning, with each update it got worse, you often miss parts of your hair, so and more, neither the front selfie nor the back still work well, and I've never seen in updates that they edited the camera's allication, disgusting.