Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
The 24MP camera puts out some decent photos but does not have an option to shoot RAW. Would have been nice to see that option. You also have a wide shot mode with uses an 8MP camera and produces pretty terrible quality images.
Related
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the LG V30 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Performs poorly when using the camera for barcode scanning and online banking deposit check scanning. Also pics are somewhat grainy and less vivid in comparison to Samsung.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Honor V10 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
The photo quality from this phone can be a little fuzzy when you zoom in. There are definitely better cameras out there.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Nokia 3.1 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Nokia 3.1 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This isn't a great camera, there are much better ones in the market in the same price range..
1. Oversaturation: This seems fine..
2. Sharp detail: Even with a dual camera set up at the highest resolution.. the image isn't sharp enough.. but the live Bokeh mode does an okayish job though..
3. Appropriate exposure: Sometimes, images aren't bright enough.. you have to go to manual mode to fix it.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Honor 10 Lite come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
The back facing camera is really crisp and clear. The front facing camera doesn't have a lot of detail, and especially shows when using snapchat.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the OPPO A72 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
48mp is more a waste of time then anything else unless you need the resolution for print. In other modes there are software issues. No voice activated shutter, clunky manual controls, hilarious ai scene recognition. it takes nice really nice photos when you get things right. Zoom is ok. For the price it's not bad.