Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Huawei Mate 40 Pro come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Huawei Mate 40 Pro come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I too tried the image quality of the pics taken in my new Huawei Mate 40 Pro which I bought a month ago from Xcite. To be frank, I was really surprised with the photos. Didn't really expect these kind of image quality.
Why photos are not will stabilized?
The phone quality is truly astounding!
maybe some pictures are nice, but they never solved the portrait mode, only the first update was good, and never again, the portrait mode in super mode was like a dslr at the beginning, with each update it got worse, you often miss parts of your hair, so and more, neither the front selfie nor the back still work well, and I've never seen in updates that they edited the camera's allication, disgusting.
Related
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Razer Phone come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
I would prefer to have left 3.5 stars as the camera is just average. Everything seems a little blurry when zoomed in. Through editing every single photo you can bring it up to a 4 star image but people don't want that. I don't want that. I just do it because I want to enjoy the photo after I took it. Razer step up please.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Nokia 3.1 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Nokia 3.1 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This isn't a great camera, there are much better ones in the market in the same price range..
1. Oversaturation: This seems fine..
2. Sharp detail: Even with a dual camera set up at the highest resolution.. the image isn't sharp enough.. but the live Bokeh mode does an okayish job though..
3. Appropriate exposure: Sometimes, images aren't bright enough.. you have to go to manual mode to fix it.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Picture quality is worst compare to their other budget phones
cheese, the photos are of awful quality. pretty much the worst camera i've ever used apart from a 2000's nokia
7a
I quite like my 6a, my only problems are with write to SD card permissions!, but I would like a better camera. do you think the 7a would be much of an improvement?
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Honor 10 Lite come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
The back facing camera is really crisp and clear. The front facing camera doesn't have a lot of detail, and especially shows when using snapchat.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Seems like every Moto phone I've had takes garbage photos on the stock software. Root & install Gcam and instantly 100x better photos. That being said this phones camera quality is like all the other G phones before it.
I think the pictures are decent. One perk is the front camera and it having a flash. That is something found in a little more pricier makes and models.