Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Redmi Note 9 Pro come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
I do have to add, that I tested the fine detail of the 48MP Redmi note 9S vs the LG G6 16MP camera, static shot, side to side and guess what, at the same image width, the LG is sharper and has more detail
48 super mega random pixels LOL
/\ Megapixels was never a comparison thing.. You have to dig into pixel density of the sensor, not quantity of Megapixels.. that's noob.... I'm on iPhone 8 Plus right now and it have only 12MP and is SUPERB.. But I'm planning to buy a cheaper phone.. I would add that Redmi note 9 Pro has 64MP sensor I guess.. It's a little bit better.. the photo is larger and so it can accomodate more pixel density.. I don't know if my iPhone 8 Plus is better or not regarding camera but I won't afford another one if anyone steal it from me.
Luckzzz said:
/\ Megapixels was never a comparison thing.. You have to dig into pixel density of the sensor, not quantity of Megapixels.. that's noob.... I'm on iPhone 8 Plus right now and it have only 12MP and is SUPERB.. But I'm planning to buy a cheaper phone.. I would add that Redmi note 9 Pro has 64MP sensor I guess.. It's a little bit better.. the photo is larger and so it can accomodate more pixel density.. I don't know if my iPhone 8 Plus is better or not regarding camera but I won't afford another one if anyone steal it from me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i just bought the RN9PRO global, i took this picture in 64MP this morning, what do you think of the quality ?
Quad Bayer 48MP means only 12MP after pixel binning. I do not see how choosing one from every four small pixels is better than simply having regular sized pixels without binning (other than being able to market it as a 48MP camera). The photo quality is not crap. It has less noise than my older phones. But that is all I can say about it.
Here is a sample image. It is a set of three images of the same scenary side-by-side. Among the first two (left and centre), one is taken in 48MP mode, the other is taken in default mode. I will not tell which one is taken in 48MP mode. See if you can figure it out. (Hint: You can not, because there is no difference). The last one (rightmost one) is HDR.
https://imgur.com/d66cSqS.jpg
Notice how the HDR mode preserves a lot more details in the darker areas, but everything in the brighter areas get a ton of halo around themselves. The halo is present in non-HDR image too, but its effect is much less.
Overall, this camera is nothing special.
Camera on curtana sucks! I don't like it at all. My old oneplus phone can even do better shots than it.
simlol12 said:
i just bought the RN9PRO global, i took this picture in 64MP this morning, what do you think of the quality ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly, I didn't like it.. It's blurred(not focused) on the center of image.. look likes there's a huge circle unfocused on center..
I guess I will go for S10 Lite or S10+
Well, I have noticed that you can zoom-in deeper with the gallery app on pics taken with 48MP mode.
But the differences on quality compared to pixel binning pics is really small, on the screen of the phone almost not noticeable.
Cam is okay for quick shots, I guess.
But what I'm missing for example are details when zooming into a taken pic. When zooming in, pics becoming blurry fast, will say things that are more in the background are not really as sharp as I wish they would be.
Have also tested different versions of GCam, but returned to the stock cam app. It gives me the "best" results and works most stable.
I have clicked the photo on redmi note 9S/ 9 Pro and edited in Adobe Lightroom
ArjunMC said:
I have clicked the photo on redmi note 9S/ 9 Pro and edited in Adobe Lightroom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Btw the car is not mine. I have just captured a parked car.
Related
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Google Pixel 3 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
So I don't have the phone yet (obviously), but I noticed in-store that the new camera app seems to use (or at least has the option to use) a "sweep" panorama now. In my rudimentary time at Verizon, it seemed to work well! I think they still have the traditional panorama shot options through a photosphere menu, but quite like before.
Had anyone exciting this yet, or see any reviews that cover it?!
If anyone cam post some jpeg & rae files taken together that would be awesome.
Even more awesomer would be the same shot taken with both p2 & p3
(Delete, wrong thread)
Heres a a few photos of my Father-in-law's koi pond at night. With a small spotlight on. Pretty good if you ask me
Hmm Tapatalk is working better for pictures I think. Here are a few others
Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
2 pics: 1 low light (cropped from 4:3), 1 portrait
Is it just me or does it feel like the camera on the Pixel 3 lags a bit when you take a photo compared to the Pixel 2? Same scene, taking with the 3 has a slight pause before the circle shows up and shows the picture taking animation. The Pixel 2 is able to take 3 shots in the same duration...
I'm not as impressed as I am when I went from 5x to pixel first gen . I just went from pixel one to pixel 3 and I'm not getting what all the hype is about. The photos are slightly better, the performance is not noticeable, the sot is a half an hour more with the same usage. I should have gone to Huawei mate 20 or something else.
This is the best quality camera I've ever seen on a phone. Its too bad I'm going to have to return it, because the phone quality is garbage. The camera is what is making the decision really painful (I don't think any other phone will compare), but I need a working phone.
Hello, I just bought the p3xl but I'm not really happy whith photos in low light , especially on Moving subjects (my daughter)... Indeed it's not possible to adjust manually aperture or Time... Do you have solutions, or maybe do you think I would be more satisfied by p30 pro or p20 pro... ? Thanks
matiew48 said:
Hello, I just bought the p3xl but I'm not really happy whith photos in low light , especially on Moving subjects (my daughter)... Indeed it's not possible to adjust manually aperture or Time... Do you have solutions, or maybe do you think I would be more satisfied by p30 pro or p20 pro... ? Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am not sure you can take low light photos of moving subjects with any phone at the moment.
The pixel 3 is amazing in taking low light photos, but you do need some light, too
This is a nice upgrade over the pixel 1
Super rez zoomed in all the way
I have the p30 pro
BBobby said:
I am not sure you can take low light photos of moving subjects with any phone at the moment.
The pixel 3 is amazing in taking low light photos, but you do need some light, too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's no comparison for taking shots of kids in low light
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Redmi Note 7 pro has 48MP camera at an aperture of f/1.8. You can take Low Light shots even more darker compared to Redmi Note 6 pro. Whereas Redmi Note 6 pro has an aperture of f/1.9.
Stellar!
The camera is much worse than rn5 whyred, especially with the stock app which succefully removes any details. Most likely because of very aggressive noise filtering. Simply you won't see any grass, only a pond of green color. There is a lot of light leak between the pixels so everything is "glowing". The excessive filtering might be avoided by using non stock app like gcam or opencamera but with these apps you will get absolutely washed colors - almost no difference between red, pink or orange.
Tried with two versions of miui as i got an ota update, unfortunately i don't remember which version it was. Returned my unit on 15.4. and went back to rn5 even though I had to pay about 30usd for the return.
Both phones are global version.
Disappointed.
univerzal said:
... and went back to rn5 ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you talking about vince or whyred? I am thinking of replacing my vince with this phone. Should I just not bother?
I have the whyred now. You'd better try the 7 if you have the chance. I also didn't like that the glass back is slippery and even if you place the phone on some rubber it might be pulled out of it with just a weight of the charging cable.. But this is not so serious problem.
Noticeable improvement is the display and the 3.5mm jack audio quality, this is much better on the 7.
Super Photo Quality of Both Camera Regard To Price Range.
Rear Camera More Accurate Than Front Camera.
think some bug or don't know camera sensor problem click some remote control photos and other photos with flash on image latters are faded or defocus or latters are wash out
Latters are wash out type faded or defocus
Rear Camera At Night In Room Light Condition
Stock Camera Comparison With Google Camera
So far so good, I keep my expectations to a minimum and so am quite happy with the results. Not every phone is built to be the best. For the price I paid its well worth , it takes pics that are as good as my Oneplus 6 which costs twice as much
stevejoshua said:
Redmi Note 7 pro has 48MP camera at an aperture of f/1.8. You can take Low Light shots even more darker compared to Redmi Note 6 pro. Whereas Redmi Note 6 pro has an aperture of f/1.9.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fake 48MP camera
Vivek151 said:
Fake 48MP camera
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty neat camera, specially with gcam.
Was using Samsung m20 before, that cam is utter garbage compared to RN7P
Can someone tell me what the height of a panorama with the stock camera is?
Thanks
Yerry said:
Can someone tell me what the height of a panorama with the stock camera is?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you mean by height?
Well the image has a width (X) which is result of how far you move and a height (Y) which is almost static.
How many pixels is Y.
Yerry said:
Well the image has a width (X) which is result of how far you move and a height (Y) which is almost static.
How many pixels is Y.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1520 pixels.
AbhiAbhiBisht said:
1520 pixels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your answer.
Just to make sure, this is stock camera app on Redmi Note 7 Pro?
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the ASUS ZenFone 6 (2019) come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Apparently there will be an update to camera, both in terms of performance and functionality, it should be available to download at 28th May, which should be just before it gets released in most places.
https://swedroid.se/forum/threads/snabba-fragor-snabba-svar-zenfone-6.165775/page-15#post-2430313
At least according to Asus Sweden
According to pocket-link, this phone can shoot multiple frame resulting in 109 megapixel photos. I haven't read from other sites before.
https://www.pocket-lint.com/phones/reviews/asus/147785-asus-zenfone-6-review-flip-camera
Does the Phone support raw shooting? If so from the 48MP camera and/or the 13PM wide?
All of this but no mention of the zoom capabilities.
Obviously optical zoom would have been mentioned, but I'm wondering how the digital zoom is before the image starts breaking up.
EVOLVIST said:
All of this but no mention of the zoom capabilities.
Obviously optical zoom would have been mentioned, but I'm wondering how the digital zoom is before the image starts breaking up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a good comparison here including zoom
Really holds up well
Im holding off at present, some of the pics look way to soft, and way to much colour saturation.
Don't expect huge improvements from what they've delivered in the past. They do have some new tech to play with to improve night shots thanks to the 48MP sensor (although missing OIS). And some will prefer the superior front cam capabilities for sure.
New update, also enables EIS on 4k 60 fps filming, from this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wvt_XhRbrU
colours are still way off :/
DxOMark Asus ZenFone 6 front camera review:
https://www.dxomark.com/asus-zenfone-6-front-camera-review/
pato said:
DxOMark Asus ZenFone 6 front camera review:
https://www.dxomark.com/asus-zenfone-6-front-camera-review/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The best front cam that they've tested, not surprisingly. Not an astounding result considering it's using its rear camera. Hopefully software changes and/or Gcam can help improve it further.
Curious to see how it scores in the Rear cam test.
TheCookieButter said:
The best front cam that they've tested, not surprisingly. Not an astounding result considering it's using its rear camera. Hopefully software changes and/or Gcam can help improve it further.
Curious to see how it scores in the Rear cam test.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right. Like, why test it as just a selfie camera?
subhani said:
Right. Like, why test it as just a selfie camera?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DXoMark does smartphones as 'selfie' (front) and 'mobile' (rear) with separate reviews. I imagine the criteria is different so they can't use one score for both still. If you look at any rear cam review the photos are a mix of people and objects, while the front cam reviews are practically entirely people based (hence 'selfie' score). It won't necessarily get the same score as a rear cam as it does a selfie cam since there is different criteria to keep even testing.
subhani said:
Right. Like, why test it as just a selfie camera?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dxomark only produces selfie score just because Asus want to show off their top score on-stage at Computex 2019
My guess is the rear camera software is still got lots more room for improvements, XDA posted today that there are major firmware upgrades for camera quality improvements
https://www.xda-developers.com/asus-zenfone-6-update-super-night-mode-hdr/
Image quality, colors and skintone looks good to my eyes in this sample https://www.eprice.com.tw/mobile/talk/4543/5333582/1/rv/asus-zenfone-6-zs630kl-6gb_128gb-review/ and even in DXOmark selfie review, the skin tone and colors are very similar to Pixel 3 which is very good for Asus smartphone
I can't wait for this phone to launch in my country
How about super night shot option. Does it work well compare to Huawei P30. Thanks.
smohanv said:
How about super night shot option. Does it work well compare to Huawei P30. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Day light photo quality is comparable to Pixel 3, S10+, iPhone XS, P30 Pro
but the night mode on P30 Pro beats anything in the market coz physics...not even samsung google apple can compete with the better and larger main sensor in P30 Pro...u may want to install gcam for night sight to get better night photo on zenfone 6
Onepunchbro said:
Day light photo quality is comparable to Pixel 3, S10+, iPhone XS, P30 Pro
but the night mode on P30 Pro beats anything in the market coz physics...not even samsung google apple can compete with the better and larger main sensor in P30 Pro...u may want to install gcam for night sight to get better night photo on zenfone 6
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. I heard that ASUS has released a firmware update which addresses super night mode issue.
https://www.xda-developers.com/asus-zenfone-6-update-super-night-mode-hdr/
Curious on seeing a comparison regarding camera quality (day/night) between the P30 non-Pro and the ZenFone 6 (with the new firmware) and see which one comes first.
dxomark . com / asus-zenfone-6-front-camera-review
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Redmi Note 8 Pro come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
I'm able to open the wide angle camera in pro mode only. Is this the only way to open it?
No, you have to slide between zoom button to switch between cameras, sliding right to 0.6x will take you to the wide angle camera
Wide angle
Or you can pinch in to get to wide angle.
Ian
Amazing!
Just zoom into that seagul ? it's too detailed
Lol XDA just reduced the quality.... But trust me... The camera quality is the best in this segment.... No phone can match... I mean realme XT is nearer but still I love natural colours which realme doesn't give... So for me redmi note 8 pro is better
Amaz
Overall very happy with camera.
Portrait is amazing.
Wide angle is useful
Main cam is better than I hoped.
2x is the only downside so far. Very hit and miss.
Couple of point and shoots. Didn't use night mode on the evening shots
irhur said:
Or you can pinch in to get to wide angle.
Ian
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OMG Thank you. I never knew this gesture.
Hi guys,
Do you also have the problem when you take a picture it's rotated? Especially when you hold it horizontally.
hello
i have problem with the camera quality
i just bought this phone and so disappointed with its camera
the details when zoom in after taking a picure is not clear
and when photo people with rear camera and zoom in, the faces looks weird ,check the attached
i know xda will reduce the quality but i guess it will give you a hint
can you please help me
mine has latest miui version global
thanks
This is a phone with camera.. Not a DSLR with phone
AlphaBravo said:
This is a phone with camera.. Not a DSLR with phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i guess you know i realize that
im talking about something shouldnt even happen in 5 years old phones with camera
i had my meizu pro 5 with 20 mb and till recently its camera is awesome in details and its zoom was astonishing
even with older phones from lenovo didnt produce such weird textures or that noise on pictures
you bought the wrong phone for photography, it's because of mediatek sensor processing, it can't par with 2019 best lenses
and with that sensor, even video recording I've seen on rn8 pro, it's a bit better than my.. 2015 redmi note 2, only a bit better..
you could try gcam, but it will never work 100%
my gf's 2 years 90€ redmi 5 gcam does a lot better job at photography on day and night.
RenatoNismo said:
you bought the wrong phone for photography, it's because of mediatek sensor processing, it can't par with 2019 best lenses
and with that sensor, even video recording I've seen on rn8 pro, it's a bit better than my.. 2015 redmi note 2, only a bit better..
you could try gcam, but it will never work 100%
my gf's 2 years 90€ redmi 5 gcam does a lot better job at photography on day and night.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
aha thanks alot for your reply
i thought maybe there was an issue with my phone or the latest firmware ruined its quality
then better to go with snapdragon mobiles i guess
It's a good mediocre phone with a not so good camera. Not the best. But it justifies its price.
Redmi note 8 Pro main Camera.
32seconds, iso 3200
Very blurry. I'll take mine to the warranty see what we can do and make out of it
From Today
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Xiaomi Mi 10 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Today I get it my Mi10. Im long time owener of Mi8. First look im very dissapointed. I see, that the Mi8 make better and sharper pictures like the Mi10.
krepsz said:
Today I get it my Mi10. Im long time owener of Mi8. First look im very dissapointed. I see, that the Mi8 make better and sharper pictures like the Mi10.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hmm i have mi8 mi9 an mi10
an mi10 takes way better pictures than mi8 an mi9
-fluffy- said:
hmm i have mi8 mi9 an mi10
an mi10 takes way better pictures than mi8 an mi9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I belive you. The first impression for me not so good. Tomorrow i will testing.
Its Not the full Quality but still amazing
Some cloud
Gesendet von meinem Mi 10 mit Tapatalk
108 mpx
Crop from a 108 pmx photo
natedogg20050 said:
Its Not the full Quality but still amazing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Horrible quality on the leafs and overall green balance. Way better on Mi 9(T).
hammer1973 said:
Crop from a 108 pmx photo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh wow - that blurryness showcases either bad skills (no offense) or an issue with exposure - it should ever have a blurryness on daillight with OIS.
Lackluster- quite lackluster - I've seen better pictures with a Mi A2 Lite and GCam (no OIS) and both Mi 9T Stock camera.
Night photo on pro mode long exposure iso
PHP:
6400
Horrible imagines, total lack of sharpness due to large sensor and aperture
The camera is a big shame!!! I'm soooo disappointed by the rear camera. Contrast and so on seems to be ok, but all pictures with the rear camera lack complete sharpness, it's awful. Compared to both the Nexus 5x and the Samsung Galaxy s9, which both only have 12mpx, the quality when zooming is soooo much worse on the mi10. Also photos in low light were better and brighter with the older two phones. Only when turning night mode on they get brighter but still. So the mi10 camera is unusable for me due to the horrible sharpness. Probably that's what comes from the huge aperture and sensor size, you only get a tiny area which is sharp on a photo, while 90% of the image is just blurry ****. Honestly if Xiaomi Cannot fix this issue soon I'll sell that dumb phone, it makes me more than mad on such an expensive phone!!! Also probably the low light imagines are not so good due to the high megapixel. Just very embarassing for Xiaomi to put a camera capable of making photos which are 90% blurry and complete inability to zoom in the picture as it just looks blurry when zooming only a little, each 12 Mox shooter has a much better sharpness when zoomed in the final picture compared to this phone. Even the front camera takes sharper pictures!!!!!!!
Plus there's the issue that photos often get only taken in 0.7mpx. I don't know if that's an issue of xiaomi or of Google photos, usually resizing to 16mpx but sometimes 0.7mpx. But might also be that photos are sometimes only taken in 0.7mpx of this stupid phone. And no the quality when zoomed in the final picture is equally worse in the full 25(27) and even 108mpx photos!!!
donksterswag said:
The camera is a big shame!!! I'm soooo disappointed by the rear camera. Contrast and so on seems to be ok, but all pictures with the rear camera lack complete sharpness, it's awful. Compared to both the Nexus 5x and the Samsung Galaxy s9, which both only have 12mpx, the quality when zooming is soooo much worse on the mi10. Also photos in low light were better and brighter with the older two phones. Only when turning night mode on they get brighter but still. So the mi10 camera is unusable for me due to the horrible sharpness. Probably that's what comes from the huge aperture and sensor size, you only get a tiny area which is sharp on a photo, while 90% of the image is just blurry ****. Honestly if Xiaomi Cannot fix this issue soon I'll sell that dumb phone, it makes me more than mad on such an expensive phone!!! Also probably the low light imagines are not so good due to the high megapixel. Just very embarassing for Xiaomi to put a camera capable of making photos which are 90% blurry and complete inability to zoom in the picture as it just looks blurry when zooming only a little, each 12 Mox shooter has a much better sharpness when zoomed in the final picture compared to this phone. Even the front camera takes sharper pictures!!!!!!!
Plus there's the issue that photos often get only taken in 0.7mpx. I don't know if that's an issue of xiaomi or of Google photos, usually resizing to 16mpx but sometimes 0.7mpx. But might also be that photos are sometimes only taken in 0.7mpx of this stupid phone. And no the quality when zoomed in the final picture is equally worse in the full 25(27) and even 108mpx photos!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I completely agree with you.
Is your phone defective?
1. Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro is top camera on dxomark
2. Xiaomi Mi 10 camera is the same as the Pro = Samsung Bright S5KHMX
Now check this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBUR3NvJWFc
kanton said:
Is your phone defective?
1. Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro is top camera on dxomark
2. Xiaomi Mi 10 camera is the same as the Pro = Samsung Bright S5KHMX
Now check this video:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dxomark lol do not base camera quality on this score
Mackay53 said:
Dxomark lol do not base camera quality on this score
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any suggestion of a better one and why is that?
kanton said:
Is your phone defective?
1. Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro is top camera on dxomark
2. Xiaomi Mi 10 camera is the same as the Pro = Samsung Bright S5KHMX
Now check this video:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's the same sensor yes. But a different config of lenses.
Xiaomi mi 10 and mi 10 pro is very different in the camera sektion.
Mi 10 dosent have 5x telephoto as Mi 10 pro has, for one more example.
Just check the specsheet.
kanton said:
Any suggestion of a better one and why is that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Chinese companies are always at top of the leaderboard and are known for offering money for reviews. Why offer money for reviews when it's free?
I wouldn't trust the reviews.
donksterswag said:
Horrible imagines, total lack of sharpness due to large sensor and aperture
The camera is a big shame!!! I'm soooo disappointed by the rear camera. Contrast and so on seems to be ok, but all pictures with the rear camera lack complete sharpness, it's awful. Compared to both the Nexus 5x and the Samsung Galaxy s9, which both only have 12mpx, the quality when zooming is soooo much worse on the mi10. Also photos in low light were better and brighter with the older two phones. Only when turning night mode on they get brighter but still. So the mi10 camera is unusable for me due to the horrible sharpness. Probably that's what comes from the huge aperture and sensor size, you only get a tiny area which is sharp on a photo, while 90% of the image is just blurry ****. Honestly if Xiaomi Cannot fix this issue soon I'll sell that dumb phone, it makes me more than mad on such an expensive phone!!! Also probably the low light imagines are not so good due to the high megapixel. Just very embarassing for Xiaomi to put a camera capable of making photos which are 90% blurry and complete inability to zoom in the picture as it just looks blurry when zooming only a little, each 12 Mox shooter has a much better sharpness when zoomed in the final picture compared to this phone. Even the front camera takes sharper pictures!!!!!!!
Plus there's the issue that photos often get only taken in 0.7mpx. I don't know if that's an issue of xiaomi or of Google photos, usually resizing to 16mpx but sometimes 0.7mpx. But might also be that photos are sometimes only taken in 0.7mpx of this stupid phone. And no the quality when zoomed in the final picture is equally worse in the full 25(27) and even 108mpx photos!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Brother brother install gcam and you're good to go.
P.s always use China developer rom you'll get your problems fixed i currently use miui mmx
I've no issues so far with my device