Various apps detect my phone as having an Adreno 512 although the SD636 is supposed to have Adreno 509. Currently DevCheck and Minecraft both show this anomaly. This isn't a serious thread but just a question from a curious teenager, interested in computers both big and small.
arko9699 said:
Various apps detect my phone as having an Adreno 512 although the SD636 is supposed to have Adreno 509. Currently DevCheck and Minecraft both show this anomaly. This isn't a serious thread but just a question from a curious teenager, interested in computers both big and small.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is 509. I dont't khow why ASUS uses SDM660 dts (kernel file) instead of SDM636 dts.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Platform: SDM660
Sent from my ZenFone Max Pro M1 using Tapatalk
arko9699 said:
Various apps detect my phone as having an Adreno 512 although the SD636 is supposed to have Adreno 509. Currently DevCheck and Minecraft both show this anomaly. This isn't a serious thread but just a question from a curious teenager, interested in computers both big and small.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have this problem also when using a custom rom for Zenfone Max Pro M1 (HAVOC, DOT OS), it will show Adreno 512 instead of 509. Maybe because Snapdragon 636 is just an underclocked version of Snapdragon 660 and both are using the same board platform (sdm660). If it does bothering you, better stick to the stock rom. :good:
It doesn't bother me per se but it is a bit offputting.
Related
I know is basically meaningless but still post your top score
just for grins
heres mine\/\/\/\/\/
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
CM7
Netarchy-nexus 1.3.0.2
max cpu 1300
min cpu 800
OC'd
miui 1.4.15
oc 1,4ghz performance
wuadrant scores actually do have meaning as long as you are comparind scores within the same device hardware (and not using any cheats or tricks) because it lets you compare how well your hardware is performing based on other people's harddware. but it does NOT have meaning comparind scores across different device models. at that point its meaningless.
company A could optimize a 500mHz phone to be smooth as butter, super optimized and efficient working on it for 3 years. while company B could not do crap, release a 2gHz phone, but not optimize it at all. so scores between those 2 devices would be meaningless.
RogerPodacter said:
wuadrant scores actually do have meaning as long as you are comparind scores within the same device hardware (and not using any cheats or tricks) because it lets you compare how well your hardware is performing based on other people's harddware. but it does NOT have meaning comparind scores across different device models. at that point its meaningless.
company A could optimize a 500mHz phone to be smooth as butter, super optimized and efficient working on it for 3 years. while company B could not do crap, release a 2gHz phone, but not optimize it at all. so scores between those 2 devices would be meaningless.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
theres no way to distinguish if they're cheating on the benchmark.. unless they're using Quadrant Advanced.
i saw today a story on bbc:
bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20891868
are there any chance, to make somebody this to gt540?
Mikopet said:
i saw today a story on bbc:
bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20891868
are there any chance, to make somebody this to gt540?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LG gt540 is a old device...
Inviato dal mio GT540 con Tapatalk 2
Besides the age of this device and the fact that there are almost no active developers (I mean real developers, not people who port roms with the help of miroslav_mm's sources and kernels), you must also realise that the ubuntu talked about in the article is not the ubuntu that you're used to from your pc. This is a special version for phones, that maybe will be able to run native linux apps. However, not even a first testing version has been released yet.
The probability of this ubuntu project dying a silent death is much bigger than the changes of it ever coming to the gt540.
Nope, GT540 is too weak.
Yeah it'll be too weak for the desktop version and too weak even for the coming Ubuntu mobile. Go check out Ubuntu websitr , minimum 1GB ram 1GHz cortex A9
Noo
we need a powerfull phone than GT540 for ubuntu
Yeah... see this
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
ubuntu
This phone is very good but too slow
Here is my question, if not, I will problaby buy the Qualcomm one.
Tapalked with a Nexus⁴
No, it seamlessly switches between Cortex-A15 and Cortex-A7 processors.
And with a kernel mod, could it be possible?
Tapalked with a Nexus⁴
I doubt it, the big.little architecture isn't really designed for that
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda app-developers app
Gokh said:
And with a kernel mod, could it be possible?
Tapalked with a Nexus⁴
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes.
wdouglass said:
I doubt it, the big.little architecture isn't really designed for that
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't know what you're talking about.
It's possible ? 8 cores together ?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
avetny said:
It's possible ? 8 cores together ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The hardware can do it. Just need the software to be aware and effectively use it.
I'd imagine it would generate lots of heat and use a lot of power if all eight were loaded though.
Does it have a 1.8 Ghz processor.
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using xda app-developers app
its a Kernel level change, not really the android sw layer. IKS (4cores max) vs HMP (heterogeneous 8 cores max)... they (linaro) are still working on the tables for these CPUs (big.LITTLE). Kernel 3.8 will have an implementation patched, and 3.9 should be finished and baked in. things can change though.
Hi All,
My sister just bought a new redmi note. But i cant find out this device in Internet whatsoever. is it a legit device or fake?
need your help to explain. thank you.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
same here, idk what model is this. I have 2 of this phones for flash
AFAIK, that's a Redmi Note 4G shipped with MIUI v6.
Although it's easily found here in Indonesia, I don't know if it's legit or not, considering it's only 1.2GHz (vs 1.6GHz) and 1GB (vs 2GB) of RAM.
It is not a fake.
It is the redmi note 4g dual-sim.
It has the hardware similar to redmi 2 (snapdragon 410 1.2(64-bit) / 1GB RAM)
http://www.miui.in.th/threads/xiaomi-epidtua-redmi-note-run-dual-sim-4g-cpu-64-bit.2055/
Shame you didn't get the 2GB of RAM though.
I do not think that 2GB version is already on the market because i cannot find even redmi 2 with 2gb ram although they advertised this.
Its legit device, I have bought the same one this month.
I advice to flash the latest stable MIUI V6 ROM from MIUI forums. Makes it run buttery smooth, even considering it only has 1GB RAM.
Interesting YouTube vid
skezza said:
Shame you didn't get the 2GB of RAM though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1GB RAM is actually enough, with MIUI V6 installed it runs pretty smooth!
redmi phone models are so complicate.......i have to find redmi 1s cu developers rom ...but only have 1s....
According to https://plus.google.com/+FranciscoFranco1990/posts/dXBtugbiy2A (by the author of Franco's kernel)
Not only its performance has improved due to numerous changes in the framework + Kernel, it proves the so much criticised Snapdragon 810 runs beautifully and cold as **** when the software implementation is right. An un****able Android version without OEM/carrier **** or ridiculous UI **** ups, with proper tuning (Marshmallow really did up its game when setting up different tasks to sets of cpus as I explained earlier).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also http://m.imgur.com/a/xExse
do you think these patches be ported to OPT ?
If so then Francisco is the guy to do it, his involvement seems to be quite official too as Adam Krisko (The community manager for OnePlus) seems to have been the one who supplied Francisco with a nice new OnePlus 2 and a OnePlus X :
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
https://plus.google.com/+FranciscoFranco1990/posts/egKJs4JqiwR
Since the official Marshmallow version is out for the OnePlus 2 this month (quite possibly the X also), it could be coming with a kernel supplied by Francisco, most likely with the optimisation you mentioned. (It's more likely they will try to release the official Marshmallow with Franco also releasing his kernel around the same time).
Which, in my book, is ALL good. Our phone could finally be becoming the "Flagship killer" it was meant to be.