Related
Look just like a bigger Moto X made by the same company that makes Moto x. Boring. Waiting for Note 5.
Because the Galaxy Note Phablets do not look like their Galaxy S Phone counterparts, right?
Did you really need to make a thread to state your opinion, rather than simply state it in the "What do you think" thread?
Enjoy waiting an entire year.
OP probably mad cause can't afford it pz.
Dr Faustus said:
Because the Galaxy Note Phablets do not look like their Galaxy S Phone counterparts, right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello?
Stylus? Wacom? S Note, S Pen?
Note series has a purpose.
kuromusha38 said:
Hello?
Stylus? Wacom? S Note, S Pen?
Note series has a purpose.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Goodbye
Bloated, Touchwiz, Sluggish, Lag
You should track down Richard Yarrell.
rebretz000 said:
Goodbye
Bloated, Touchwiz, Sluggish, Lag
You should track down Richard Yarrell.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OP has a good point, you can't just dismiss his arguments just because Samsung sucks.
The point OP is trying to make is that at least the Note series offers more diversity than the Galaxy S counterparts, whereas the Nexus 6 is just a bigger version of the Moto X (with almost identical specs) and almost no phablet benefits.
Op is mad but who cares
Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk
Different guts!
HTC One M8
Jimlarck said:
OP has a good point, you can't just dismiss his arguments just because Samsung sucks.
The point OP is trying to make is that at least the Note series offers more diversity than the Galaxy S counterparts, whereas the Nexus 6 is just a bigger version of the Moto X (with almost identical specs) and almost no phablet benefits.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, it looks like a bigger Moto X. Specs wise though it isn't. Higher res screen, bigger battery, better camera with OIS, stereo speakers (only 1on the X), and that's what I can remember from the top of my head. If someone is trying to justify not purchasing it for some reason, fine. However, don't just call it a bigger X
SupaSwag said:
Sure, it looks like a bigger Moto X. Specs wise though it isn't. Higher res screen, bigger battery, better camera with OIS, stereo speakers (only 1on the X), and that's what I can remember from the top of my head. If someone is trying to justify not purchasing it for some reason, fine. However, don't just call it a bigger X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Higher resolution and bigger battery is expected with a bigger phone. Nothing special. Nothing to differentiate it from moto X apart from the size.
SupaSwag said:
Sure, it looks like a bigger Moto X. Specs wise though it isn't. Higher res screen, bigger battery, better camera with OIS, stereo speakers (only 1on the X), and that's what I can remember from the top of my head. If someone is trying to justify not purchasing it for some reason, fine. However, don't just call it a bigger X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright, you got me there.
Nexus 6 vs Moto X
2K display vs 1080p
3GB RAM vs 2GB
S805 vs S801
3220mAh vs 2300mAh
Adreno 420 vs Adreno 330
13MP (OIS) vs 13MP
$649 vs $549
A hundred dollars extra for an upscaled Moto X (both size and spec-wise).
Now I guess the only other argument someone can make is the lack of phablet-unique tools/features. But at this point it depends on how Android Lollipop will handle phablets.
Sorry OP, your claim has been disproven. The Nexus 6 is not just a bigger Moto X.
is screen amoled?
kuromusha38 said:
is screen amoled?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apparently so. Guessing it's for better battery consumption on darker colors.
Also has qi charging. And a lack of tacky back covers
Sent from my GT-I9505G using Tapatalk
Jimlarck said:
Apparently so. Guessing it's for better battery consumption on darker colors.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess might be a good media consumption device.
If only it had stylus, removable battery and sd card, then I might buy it.
the n6 looks better as well
SupaSwag said:
Sure, it looks like a bigger Moto X. Specs wise though it isn't. Higher res screen, bigger battery, better camera with OIS, stereo speakers (only 1on the X), and that's what I can remember from the top of my head. If someone is trying to justify not purchasing it for some reason, fine. However, don't just call it a bigger X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right.
kuromusha38 said:
Higher resolution and bigger battery is expected with a bigger phone. Nothing special. Nothing to differentiate it from moto X apart from the size.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Completely wrong.
It's not just bigger. Unlike the 2nd Gen Moto X, the Nexus 6 has:
OIS
3 GB ram (vs. 2 GB on Moto X)
64 GB storage option (32 GB max on Moto X)
Bigger battery (that will do much more than just compensate for the larger screen)
It covers more LTE bands (such as band 12 for T-Mobile, which the 2nd Gen Moto X is missing) and is more of a true global phone.
stereo speakers
USB-On-the-go
Wifi Direct
Snapdragon 805 (vs 801 on Moto X)
Krait 450 CPU (vs 400 on Moto X)
Adrena 420 GPU (vs 330 on Moto X)
The Nexus 6 is a much better device in many ways than the 2nd Gen Moto X. It also has a much more subdued version of the Motorola Logo on the back (which is really ugly, I think, on the 2nd Gen Moto X, marring an otherwise nice design).
(But too bad it's so huge, sigh. I don't really want a phablet.)
Jimlarck said:
OP has a good point, you can't just dismiss his arguments just because Samsung sucks.
The point OP is trying to make is that at least the Note series offers more diversity than the Galaxy S counterparts, whereas the Nexus 6 is just a bigger version of the Moto X (with almost identical specs) and almost no phablet benefits.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Op is a troll who starts **** in the moto threads. Nothing to see here
SupaSwag said:
Sure, it looks like a bigger Moto X. Specs wise though it isn't. Higher res screen, bigger battery, better camera with OIS, stereo speakers (only 1on the X), and that's what I can remember from the top of my head. If someone is trying to justify not purchasing it for some reason, fine. However, don't just call it a bigger X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank u
Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk
Ok, so i love Motorola as a company, despite the recent hate (which is not justified in my opinion), i love all their products and i think they are great. I owned a Moto G 1st gen and bought the Moto G 2nd gen right after the launch and loving it even more after Android L update, so i have a wish list for the next gen
If they want to dominate the mid range phone segment and make a killer smartphone i would recommend the next wish list, i don't know if it is possible for the price, so here it is:
Display: 5” - 5.5" full HD IPS 1080 x 1920 pixels
Processor: Qualcomm® Snapdragon™ 615 octa-core chipset (MSM8939) 64-bit
GPU: Adreno 405
RAM: 2 GB A MUST!
Storage: 16GB, microSD card slot, up to 64GB
Camera: 8 Megapixel Rear Camera, 2MP Front Camera
Battery: 2700 mAh
Software: Android L or latest
Dual front facing speakers
And all the conectivity, GPS, microUSB 2.0, Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Bluetooth etc.
For the same price! Or max 200$
What do you guys think? Is it possible?
You are pretty much describing the Moto X, but at the price of a Moto G.
I'd say 5-5,2", 720p screen, Snapdragon 410, LTE , 16GB ROM, 2GB RAM, camera stabilizer, microSD, 2700 mAh battery. So the same thing with a bit of an improvement in the processor, LTE, more RAM, more battery and stabilization for the camera; exactly what the Moto G 2nd Gen lacks of.
Just more RAM - 2 GB would be the best possible improvement. With the other specifications I am ok actually.
I only add more RAM and 64bits processor
And LTE By default for all models
Sent from my XT1068 using XDA Free mobile app
2GB Ram
Snapdragon 615
LTE
Adreno 405
2400 mAh battery
That would keep it competitive with newer mid-range phones coming out.
Keep the screen the same. Camera could use some improvement, but I don't want a bump in price, so I could do without that. I don't even mind 8GB internal since it has an SD slot.
andreu24 said:
You are pretty much describing the Moto X, but at the price of a Moto G.
I'd say 5-5,2", 720p screen, Snapdragon 410, LTE , 16GB ROM, 2GB RAM, camera stabilizer, microSD, 2700 mAh battery. So the same thing with a bit of an improvement in the processor, LTE, more RAM, more battery and stabilization for the camera; exactly what the Moto G 2nd Gen lacks of.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Moto x 2nd gen has a snapdragon 801 32-bit processor and a amoled display where are they the same? Please point the similarities here is the spec list of the X 2nd gen http://www.gsmarena.com/motorola_moto_x_(2014)-6649.php
Well, I meant "a" Moto X. I just don't see it happening for 179-200$ and those specs are high-end, so if you wanted something similar you should be looking for a Moto X. It'd cost you, but you aren't getting this at that price.
andreu24 said:
Well, I meant "a" Moto X. I just don't see it happening for 179-200$ and those specs are high-end, so if you wanted something similar you should be looking for a Moto X. It'd cost you, but you aren't getting this at that price.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The price for those components will drop by the end of the year when the Moto G 2015 wil come out, look at this phones, and you will see it is possible Zenfone 2 http://www.androidauthority.com/asus-zenfone-2-hands-first-impressions-579187/ 200$ for the base model, ZTE Blade S6 $250 and you get Lollipop, Snapdragon 615, LTE, and a 13MP camera http://www.androidauthority.com/zte-blade-s6-price-specs-features-583086/
andreu24 said:
Well, I meant "a" Moto X. I just don't see it happening for 179-200$ and those specs are high-end, so if you wanted something similar you should be looking for a Moto X. It'd cost you, but you aren't getting this at that price.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those really aren't high end specs in 2015, that's similar to what the next crop of already announced midrange phones is offering. Component are getting cheaper and the mid-range market is more competitive now than when the first Moto G came out.
An OLED FHD display would be nice, especially for the night mode so the smartphone can finally be used as a suitable nighstand alarm clock without that awful background light all the current smartphones are emitting... !!!
Other than the above:
64bit 4/8 core CPU
2GB of LPDDR4 RAM
16GB ROM
Gorilla Glass 4
Replaceable 3200 mAh Li-ion or Supercapacitor
8-12 Mp Camera with stabilization and depth sensor
2-5 Mp Front facing camera
5"-5.1" FHD OLED display
Better stereo front speakers
And maybe a little less plastic for the housing
My wishlist would be basically slightly upgraded Moto G LTE
4.5" screen
2Gb ram
Larger battery
Better camera
8GB ROM with microSD slot.
Wireless charging.
Sidenote, I'm not convinced that Moto G needs to over 5" screensize because one of it's strongest selling points aside from clean OS is that there are very few options in it's size group unless you go for used and/or older models. For example, Samsung's compact models are really underwhelming while Sony's offerings are very expensive, then you have random budget-brands which I wouldn't touch even with a 10-foot pole. LG has couple models that are pretty close, but display resolution is disappointing.
if thats what the 2015 moto g is going to have, im leaving the flagship, sorry, this is my choice
As per the specs u want be ready to pay heavily as u have described a Moto gen X 2
---------- Post added at 11:50 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:49 AM ----------
And by considering the specs suggested by some members i think it will beat the price of Nexus 6 or Moto X 2 . lol
Hi all
This thread is for discussions regarding the overall design features or hardware specifications of the Motorola Moto Maxx. Feel free to comment on performance compared with previous devices.
Specifications:
Display - OLED, 5.2 inches, 1440 x 2560 pixels (~565 ppi pixel density)
Chipset - Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
CPU - Quad-core 2.7 GHz Krait 450
GPU - Adreno 420
RAM - 3 GB
Memory - 64 GB
Camera - 21 MP, (5248 x 3936), autofocus, dual-LED flash
Secondary Camera - 2 MP
Sensors - Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Connectivity - Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, Wi-Fi hotspot, Bluetooth v4.0
Battery - 3900 mAh
Dimensions - 143.5 x 73.3 x 8.3 - 11.2 mm
Weight - 176 g
Color Availability - Black Ballistic Nylon
source: gsmarena
Gsm/hspa/lte bands for all Moto Maxx/Moto Turbo
These are the bands the XT1225 receives -- BOTH the "international" Moto Maxx" and "Moto Turbo":
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Not all the Motorola websites (Puerto Rico, Mexico, Brazil) list all the XT1225 bands. Or at least they didn't when first released. I haven't checked recently.
Initially, they left out mentioning LTE band 5 and HSPA band 4 (even though the FCC found those bands when certifying the XT1225 -- which was necessary for the phone to be sold in Puerto Rico, which is a U.S. territory).
It's not unusual for manufacturers to have additional bands enabled which are not listed in "official" specs. Apple did it in 2012 with their iPhone.
All the Moto Maxx/Moto Turbo phones carry the same FCC ID, so they have to be identical devices with the same radio frequencies.
I own two of them from different countries, so I have first hand knowledge. Also, I have seen the FCC ID listed on the XT1225 Moto Turbo in pictures.
However the Motorola India website DOES list all the bands of the XT1225. Using modem scanning software, I found all the bands on the XT1225 Moto Maxx BEFORE the XT1225 Moto Turbo was released in India -- and users in the U.S. and Canada confirmed those bands were there by using carriers which used those bands.
When Motorola released the XT1225 Moto Turbo in India (same FCC ID as the XT1225 Moto Maxx, so IDENTICAL device) it confirmed what many of us already knew.
Motorola released the XT1225 under the "Turbo" name in that market because there's a Max or Maxx carrier in India, and Motorola didn't want any confusion that the phone was associated with that carrier.
http://www.motorola.in/consumers/Vi...oto-Turbo/moto-turbo-in.html#moto-turbo-specs
In fact, I flashed both my XT1225 Moto Maxx to XT1225 Moto Turbo -- which didn't actually change any radio frequencies -- except now I don't have to argue about the specs. I can just point to the Motorola India website "official" specs. But the specs -- including radio frequencies -- are the same across all the XT1225. Perhaps Motorola has revised their other countries' websites to reflect reality, but I have not checked recently.
______________
These are the bands the XT1250 receives -- the U.S. Moto Maxx, which is sold by smaller regional CDMA/LTE carriers in the United States:
The XT1250 Moto Maxx is IDENTICAL to the XT1254 Verizon Droid Turbo -- same FCC ID, same bands, same specs -- except it has an unlock-able bootloader. The XT1250 is basically the "dev" version of the Droid Turbo. You can unlock the bootloader, install TWRP recovery, root, etc.
______________
The U.S. Moto Maxx XT1250 is not to be confused with the International Moto Maxx XT1225 and Moto Turbo XT1225 (see even the Turbo name is not exclusive), which are also Moto Quark phones but do not have CDMA bands enabled, and have a slightly different mix of LTE bands. All the XT1225 models are the same device, in spite of having two model names (Moto Turbo and Moto Maxx). Same FCC ID across all regions, same SKU.
See, there were basically two Motorola Quark phones -- with two different FCC IDs -- released under THREE model names:
FCC ID IHDT56PK1:
XT1254 U.S. Droid Turbo/XT1250 U.S. Moto Maxx (identical device, CMDA/GSM/HSPA/LTE bands -- except for model name). The XT1250 will run on Verizon, with a Verizon SIM card. This device has LTE bands 2, 3, 4, 7, 13 enabled.
__________
FCC ID IHDT56PK2:
XT1225 "international" Moto Turbo/XT1225 "international" Moto Maxx (identical device, GSM/HPSA/LTE bands, except for model names). No CMDA. This LTE bands 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 17 enabled.
________
Of the two Quark models -- released under three models names (Moto Maxx, Moto Turbo, Droid Turbo) -- only the one with the model name "Droid Turbo" has locked down bootloader.
The XT1250 U.S. Moto Maxx is basically the "dev" version of the XT1254 "Droid Turbo" if you can get your hands on it. (unlock-able bootloader, can be easily rooted, TWRP installed, etc.)
FYI: in the U.S., due to the American Disability Act (ADA), a device with the same FCC ID as another is the SAME device, no matter if it has a different model name for marketing purpose. Devices are certified to work with hearing impaired by the FCC ID. Any company that messes that up is liable for millions of dollars in fines and lawsuits in the United States.
Thus the fact the XT1250 U.S. Moto Maxx and XT1254 Verizon Droid Turbo both have the same FCC ID shows the device and all the Droid Turbo device's specs/frquencies is NOT "exclusive" to Verizon. Only the name "Droid" is exclusive (because Verizon paid for the rights), not the device. Anyone that says differently is just believing Verizon's marketing lies and doesn't REALLY know about the technical/legal aspects of the cell phone industry.
Many people have bought the XT1250 U.S. Moto Maxx and run it on Verizon with a Verizon SIM card, just like a non Verizon Nexus 6. It's the same phone as the XT1254 Droid Turbo, just a different model name. Same FCC ID irrefutably proves it.
______________________________________________
My 5.2" Moto Nexus 6.
I bought the XT1225 Moto Maxx because I am a huge Nexus smartphone fan. What?
Let me explain. My wife and I owned both the gen3 Galaxy Nexus (4.65", 720p) and the gen5 LG Nexus 5 (4.95", 1080p). I had followed Nexus smartphones and tablets extensively even before we owned any, and had even been invited by an Android website to write a blog about them. (I declined due to work restrictions.) Knowing the history of the Nexus smartphones, the gen6 Nexus phone should have been 5.2" 1440p...
Oh, and for the Nexus phones, any number in the name the was the generation model, not the screen size. The Nexus One was NOT 1". The Nexus 4 was closer to 5" than 4". It was NEVER the screen size. For the tablets, yes -- but NOT for the smartphones.
gen1: HTC One, 3.5"
gen2: Samsung Nexus S, 4.0"
gen3: Samsung Galaxy Nexus, 4.65" HD 720p
gen4: LG Nexus 4, 4.7" HD 720p
gen5: LG Nexus 5, 4.95" full HD 1080p
Therefore...
gen6: Nexus 6, probably 5.2", at least full HD 1080p -- probably QHD 1440p. (this was what should have been, not what actually happened -- as we know)
The mainstream "sweet point" in 2014 was a range of 5.1 - 5.5" -- made by the flagship LG, HTC, Samsung, Sony phones. (2014 LG G3 was the outlier at 5.5" but had super slim bezels and was in some dimensions actually smaller than the 2014 5.1" HTC M8.) Even the 2013 & 2014 Samsung Galaxy Note phablet was only 5.7", because even Samsung knows there's a LIMIT to how big a phone can be.
Up to this point for Nexus smartphones, Google had always gone with cutting edge hardware specs (CPU, GPU, resolution) while going with mainstream size, and skimping on camera and battery. Thus 5.2" 1440p with latest Snapdragon was the most logical choice...
Instead Google made a huge mistake and went with a 6" Nexus phablet -- which had poor sales due to size and price. Mostly size. They have admitted their mistake and this year (2015) are making two Nexus phones, both of which are SMALLER than the Nexus 6 whale. I think that's a big mea culpa!
In fact, we know Google/Motorola were testing a 5.2" 1440p gen6 Nexus ("Shamu") as of mid-August 2014. We have the leaked benchmarks to prove it. But after that point in time Google chose the larger of the two variants they were testing.
Motorola subsequently released the "Quark" phones, which are basically 5.2" versions of the 64GB Motorola Nexus 6.
As you can see, 95% same specs but just in a more reasonable size. Same CPU, GPU, Snapdragon SoC, Qi wireless charging, turbo charging, multiple HSPA/LTE bands (yeah not as many as the Nexus 6 but enough for me)... Oh, and the XT1225 has a LARGER battery than the Moto Nexus 6.
The software portion is for "stock" software. For the XT1225 we have several 5.1.1 custom ROMs.
The Quark would be perfect, if only the XT1225 had rear camera OIS and front stereo speakers!
So, I bought two Moto XT1225 to be MY Nexus 6. It's the phone Google should have released last year as the Nexus 6. Or they should have pulled an Apple and released two phones last year (like they are doing this year). The 5.2" would have been a best seller!
For me it was never about price, it was about specs and size. I bought two of these phones which cost me as much as buying two 64GB Moto Nexus 6. Motorola got my money instead of Google.
Google screwed up, but I still got the 5.2" Moto Nexus 6 I wanted.
Excellent post, ChazzMatt. Another Nexus fan here. I come from a Nexus 4 (Mako) (which I still have and love, despite its battery lasting less and less everyday, and despite its power button getting less responsive). I would've been okay with a Shamu, but I was attracted by Quark's large battery. And yeah, the hardware is practically the same, so I went for it. With CM on it, it's just like a Nexus.
Nexus 5x/Nexus 6p vs Moto XT1225
I owned two gen3 Galaxy Nexus and two gen5 LG Nexus 5 smartphones. I did not buy a Nexus 6 as Google screwed up and made it too big. Instead I bought two 5.2" Moto XT1225 which had 95% of the Moto Nexus 6 specs in a more reasonable size. So, I was curious about the upcoming gen7 Nexus phones. Would they make me want to "upgrade"?
At least Google is making two Nexus phones this year (5.2", 5.7"), and in a telling apology BOTH are smaller than last year's 6" Nexus WHALE.
However they are making a mistake by giving the 5.2" lesser specs than the 5.7". Just because some people want a more reasonable phone to hold doesn't mean they don't want top hardware specs.
Read the article. More comments at bottom.
_________________
http://www.knowyourmobile.com/googl...x-nexus-6p-release-date-specs-prices-features
The Nexus 5X & Nexus 6P Are HERE: Specs & Hardware Detailed
Google has officially announced the Nexus 5X and the Nexus 6P. The handsets represent a big shift in how Google does phones. For starters, there’s two handsets -- something that has never happened before. Second, because there are two handsets users now have a choice over which option they go for -- do you want the big one or the smaller, Nexus 5-style handset?
The Nexus 5X: The Nexus 5 Redesigned
The Nexus 5X features a 5.2-inch LCD display with full HD resolution, just like the original Nexus 5. The Nexus 5X has a pixel density of 424 ppi. Under the hood you’ll find a 2GHz hexa-core Snapdragon 808 processor alongside 2GB of LPDDR3 RAM. With storage you have two options: 16GB and 32GB. As usual, there is ZERO SD-support.
Google has also updated the camera too. It is now a 12.3MP rear camera with an f/2.0 aperture and laser-assisted focus. On the front you have a 5MP unit for selfies and Hangouts. The Nexus 5X also has a fingerprint scanner for security and Android Pay, a Micro USB Type-C port and a 2,700 mAh battery. The handset will ship with Android Marshmallow as well, obviously.
Nexus 5X Specs In FULL
Operating System: Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Display: 5.2 inches, FHD (1920 x 1080) LCD at 423 ppi, Corning® Gorilla® Glass 3, Fingerprint and smudge-resistant oleophobic coating
Rear Camera: 12.3 MP¹, 1.55 µm pixels, f/2.0 aperture, IR laser-assisted autofocus, 4K (30 fps) video capture, Broad-spectrum CRI-90 dual flash
Front Camera: 5 MP, 1.4 µm pixels, f/2.0 aperture
Processors: Qualcomm® Snapdragon™ 808 processor, 1.8 GHz hexa-core 64-bit, Adreno 418 GPU
Memory & Storage: RAM: 2 GB LPDDR3, Internal storage: 16 GB or 32 GB
Dimensions³: 147.0 x 72.6 x 7.9 mm
Weight: 136 g
Colour Options: Carbon, Quartz, Ice
Nexus 5X & Nexus 6P In A Nutshell
Nexus 6P is the first all-metal-body Nexus phone. Built in collaboration with Huawei, this 5.7” phone is crafted from aeronautical-grade aluminum, with a USB Type-C port for fast charging, a powerful 64-bit processor, and a 12.3 MP camera sensor with massive 1.55µm pixels (hello, better photos!). The Nexus 6P starts at $499.
You’re not the only one who misses your Nexus 5. We’ve joined forces with LG to bring it back with the new Nexus 5X, which gives you great performance in a compact and light package, with a beautiful 5.2” screen and the same 12.3 MP camera and Type-C port as the Nexus 6P. Nexus 5X starts at $379.
The Nexus 6P: A New Dawn For Nexus Flagships
_________________
The Nexus 6P is Google’s flagship, the handset designed to do battle with the iPhone 6s, Samsung Galaxy S6 and LG G4. Like the Nexus 6, the Nexus 6P features a 5.7in AMOLED WQHD display, meaning you’re looking at a rather awesome 2560 x 1440 pixel panel with a pixel density of 518ppi.
“Huawei is very excited to collaborate with Google and deliver a premium Nexus experience for the global market,” said Richard Yu, CEO of Huawei Consumer Business Group. “We value the way consumers embrace mobile technology in all parts of their lives and have created a smartphone with great design, performance and seamless integration of Android 6.0 Marshmallow, the latest Android release.”
“We're excited to partner with Huawei to introduce customers to Nexus 6P, our most premium phone yet and Android 6.0, Marshmallow, our most polished and highest-performing OS ever." Said Hiroshi Lockheimer, VP Android, Chromecast and Chrome OS at Google.
Unlike the Nexus 5X, the Nexus 6P uses Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 810 CPU. This is 64-bit chipset and has it has proven time and time again its pedigree inside some of Android’s best handsets so far this year. The Nexus 6P also features 3GB of RAM, dual front-facing stereo speakers, a Micro USB Type-C port, a 12.3MP main camera, an 8-megapixel front-facing selfie camera, a massive 3,450 battery and either 16GB, 64GB or 128GB of storage.
Nexus 6P Specs In FULL
Operating System: Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Display: 5.7 inches; WQHD (2560 x 1440) AMOLED display at 518 ppi; 16:9 aspect ratio; Corning® Gorilla® Glass 4; Fingerprint and smudge-resistant oleophobic coating
Rear Camera: 12.3 MP¹; 1.55 µm pixels; f/2.0 aperture; IR Laser assisted autofocus; 4K (30 fps) video capture; Broad-spectrum CRI-90 dual flash
Front Camera: 8MP camera; 1.4 µm pixels; f/2.4 aperture; HD video capture (30 fps)
Processors: Qualcomm® Snapdragon™ 810 v2.1, 2.0 GHz Octa-core 64-bit; Adreno 430 GPU
Memory & Storage: RAM: 3 GB LPDDR4; Internal storage: 32 GB, 64 GB, or 128 GB
Dimensions: 159.3 X 77.8 X 7.3 mm
Weight: 178 g
Color: Aluminium; Graphite; Frost
Media: Dual front-facing stereo speakers; 3 microphones (2 front, 1 rear) with noise cancellation
Battery: 3,450 mAh battery; Fast charging: up to 7 hours of use from only 10 minutes of charging
Wireless & Location: LTE cat. 6; Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n/ac 2x2 MIMO, dual-band (2.4 GHz, 5.0 GHz); Bluetooth 4.2; NFC; GPS, GLONASS; Digital compass; Wi-Fi use requires 802.11a/b/g/n/ac access point (router). Syncing services, such as backup, require a Google Account.
Ports: USB Type-C; Single Nano SIM slot: 3.5 mm audio jack
Material: Anodized aluminum
____________
Nexus 2015 Release Date: Handsets WILL Ship In October
According to a report from MobileSyrup, Canadian carrier Telus has revealed some details about the Android 6.0 Marshmallow rollout. Allegedly it will be rolling from October 5 to a selection of devices, this is according to a "subject to change" software release schedule from the firm. Devices mentioned for Marshmallow specifically include the existing Nexus 5 and Nexus 6 models. Assuming that the Nexus and Marshmallow launch is going ahead on September 29 a software rollout date of October 5 would certainly make a lot of sense.
Google has now confirmed that both the Nexus 5X and Nexus 6P will begin shipping during October. The Nexus 5X starts at $379 and the Nexus 6P starts at $499. We don't have UK pricing just yet, but it is likely to be the same. We'll update as soon as we know more.
The 16GB Nexus 5X will be priced at $379.99, but currently the price of the 32GB option is not known. It has been confirmed that the Nexus 5X will be up for pre-order on Google Play in the UK, US, Japan, Ireland and South Korea, in "Carbon", "Quartz" and "Ice Blue" finishes.
As expected the Nexus 6P will be a bit more expensive, the base model is 32GB and will cost $499.99 and there will be 64GB and 128GB models too, but again no prices for those just yet. Colour options for the metal finish are "Aluminium", "Graphite" and "Frost", while the gold option will be a Japan exclusive at first. Pre-order availability includes the UK, Canada, Japan, US and Ireland.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
_____________
GOOD: Both Nexus phones are better than any iPhone. (the 5.7" has higher resolution, bigger display, bigger battery than the iPhone 6s Plus, yet is smaller and lighter). Also, Google went back to lower pricing for their Nexus smartphones.
_________
BAD: I'm not that impressed with either one -- at least compared to what I have right now (2014 Moto XT1225). There are many Androids better than iPhones. The competition is not inferior iPhones but the top-tier Androids. For instance, both 2015 Nexus phones lack Qi wireless charging and rear camera OIS. What?
The 5.2" variant also needs 3GB RAM, 1440p, and bigger battery -- instead of 2GB RAM, 1080p and 2700 mAh battery. It's just a warmed-over 2013 LG G2 (5.2", 1080p, 2GB RAM). But the LG G2 at least had a 3,000 mAh battery, and the 2013 gen5 LG Nexus 5 (based on the LG G2) had Qi wireless and rear camera OIS. We are now up to gen7 and going backwards?
Also the 5.2" needs a bigger storage option. Tops out at 32GB.
In comparison, MY current 2014 Moto XT1225 has 5.2" AMOLED display, 1440p, 3GB RAM, 3900 mAh battery, 64GB storage, Qi wireless charging, Turbo Quick Charging, 21MP auto-focus camera with dual flash. Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspot.
Google should have put ALL that into the 2015 5.2" Nexus phone and MORE. Not LESS.
Sure the Snapdragon 808/810 is slightly faster, but I'm content with my Snapdragon 805. I'm comparing features, not the assumed yearly CPU upgrade. Whereas, the upcoming 2016 Snapdragon 820 will make a huge difference.
Software is not a difference, as my phone can have new Marshmallow 6.0 as soon as I want it after release. (I'm rooted, run developer group ROMs.) I hope Marshmallow 6.0 out of the gate will be better than buggy Lollipop 5.0 last October. Whereas Kitkat 4.4.4 was rock stable. It took until 5.1.1 (about six months) to straighten out issues. But Marshmallow will be available for my phone almost immediately, via CM. Just depends on how quickly I want to switch over to it?
The only thing either new Nexus phone has that XT1225 does not is the stereo speakers and laser-assisted auto-focus. (Just found out the 5.2" doesn't have stereo speakers either. I don't know what the bottom grill is for.) But I have a 21MP camera... which neither 2015 Nexus phone has. My 5.2" XT1225 has a bigger battery (3900 mAh) than either Nexus. I have Qi wireless charging, which neither has -- which is the real deal breaker for me.
I have Kevlar with ballistic nylon overlay, so I'm not jealous of aluminum in any way. My phone can stop a bullet. (Besides with a a case to prevent scuffs/scrapes, it's not like any actually sees the aluminum.)
And no, I'm not impressed by the new C port, IF the trade-off is loss of Qi wireless convenience. Yeah, someone from Google said that's why they left out Qi charging, which is a stupid reason. It's not either/or, you can have BOTH.
So, tell me why I should dump my phone and trade DOWN?
______
BOTTOM LINE: The 2015 Nexus phones aren't bad phones, especially if you are upgrading from a phone 2 or more years older. But the 5.2" variant is distinctly a mid-tier phone compared to 2014 and 2015 top-tier Androids, which is very disappointing.
Even the 5.7" needs a couple more features (Qi wireless, rear camera OIS) to be considered true top tier. Previous Nexus phones (gen 5 Nexus 5, gen6 Nexus 6) had those features.
So, it's strange Google would rectify their WHALE mistake from last year, while committing more mistakes this year.
@ChazzMatt Completely agree with you.
It's hard for others to understand how I feel, but I'm disappointed at this year's wave of smartphones.
Also I want to add that no matter how much they talk about the 810, I will always feel like its a failed product. I don't know why but I wouldn't buy a phone with it (even though all issues are probably fixed by now)
Plus, once you go 3900mA, it's hard to go small again (even a bit)
Will see what 2016 has in store for us.
Sent from my Moto MAXX using Tapatalk
In my opinion, the Nexus 5X looks like a cheapo Chinese plastic device. The Nexus 6P looks okay for me, though.
Anyway, I'm very happy with my Quark, and I'm not wasting more money on smartphones until at least two more years.
If anyone's interested, Amazon is apparently offering the Moto X 2014 for $199 new right now.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00MW...sr=8-1&pi=AC_SX110_SY165&keywords=Moto+x+2014
I would argue that the X right now is still a better deal than the 2015 G, given that it has the faster (though older) processor, slightly older but far less noisy camera and Moto Voice, as well as a metal frame. Just be sure that Android updates beyond Marshmallow aren't top priority.
AB__CD said:
If anyone's interested, Amazon is apparently offering the Moto X 2014 for $199 new right now.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00MW...sr=8-1&pi=AC_SX110_SY165&keywords=Moto+x+2014
I would argue that the X right now is still a better deal than the 2015 G, given that it has the faster (though older) processor, slightly older but far less noisy camera and Moto Voice, as well as a metal frame. Just be sure that Android updates beyond Marshmallow aren't top priority.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just saw it today... do you think is a good upgrade over a Nexus 5? Or should I wait for something better?
blanco2701 said:
I just saw it today... do you think is a good upgrade over a Nexus 5? Or should I wait for something better?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you're upgrading from the Nexus 5, I'd advise you actually wait for something better, or spend a bit more and get the 5X. You're getting a similar screen (same res, roughly same size, but now AMOLED), a slightly more powerful chip (but that's honestly splitting hairs) and a just as inconsistent camera. The only real upgrades here are the build and slightly newer stuff inside, and unless that's worth $199 to you, then wait.
This is more for people who are upgrading from anything older than 2013 (flagship) or 2014 (midrange), where the difference is going to jump. But from a nexus 5 it's not going to be significant enough in my opinion.
Sent from my SM-N920I using Tapatalk
AB__CD said:
If anyone's interested, Amazon is apparently offering the Moto X 2014 for $199 new right now.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00MW...sr=8-1&pi=AC_SX110_SY165&keywords=Moto+x+2014
I would argue that the X right now is still a better deal than the 2015 G, given that it has the faster (though older) processor, slightly older but far less noisy camera and Moto Voice, as well as a metal frame. Just be sure that Android updates beyond Marshmallow aren't top priority.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Per Amazon it is running 5.0:
Product Dimensions: Height: 140.8mm (5.54 inches) Width: 72.4mm (2.85 inches) Curve: 3.8-9.9mm (0.15-0.39 inches)
Operating System: Android 5.0 Lollipop
Display: 5.2" AMOLED, 1080p FULL HD 1920x1080, 423 ppi, Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Weight: 144 grams (5.08 ounces)
Battery: 2300 mAh Mixed usage up to 24 hours
Processor: Motorola Mobile Computing System including 2.5GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 with quad-core CPU (MSM 8974-AC), Adreno 330 @ 578 MHz GPU, Natural Language Processor, Contextual Computing Processor
Memory: 2GB
Camera: Rear: 13MP F2.25 Front: 2MP (1080p)
Connectivity: Micro USB, 3.5mm headset jack
Bluetooth Technology: Bluetooth version 4.0 LE
SIM Card: Nano-SIM
Networks: GSM/GPRS/EDGE, UMTS/HSPA+, 4G LTE
It also doesn't state model but one of the user questions is answered as it being XT1095.
If it is on 5.0 one should be able to root via Mofo and unlock bootloader via Sunshine.
I agree that this phone would be a better deal than the 2015 G.
My resale value! :/
Sent from my XT1095 using Tapatalk
Just got this amazon deal... Its a XT1095 loaded with 4.4.4
Actually, from what I've read so far, the 5X camera is actually pretty good it seems. So I agree. Spend a little more and get the 5X. Plus the big advantage... Updates.
Sent from my XT1095 using XDA Free mobile app
Hi, I have a Moto X Style/Pure, the 16gb model, and I wondering if anybody has this yet that could tell me if going for more storage and ram is worth the switch. I love the idea of 4gb ram/64gb of storage but 4gb ram with 617 processor vs 3gb ram 808 processor
Wow, i have both and i love both, one with my personal number and other with my work number.
Enviado desde mi Moto G (4) mediante Tapatalk
So would go as far as to say there's a real sacrifice going from the x to g plus?
Damn.... i love the x screen but the g camera is awesome
Enviado desde mi Moto G (4) mediante Tapatalk
dashiell_cano said:
Damn.... i love the x screen but the g camera is awesome
Enviado desde mi Moto G (4) mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so if you have both, how would you compare them in terms of performance and battery life?
Performance and speed looks similar.
Battery.... I love the Moto g⁴
Sound.... both
Screen l.... moto x
Camera.... moto g ⁴
Remember that are for different market segment
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
I am in a dilemma which one to buy. My usage pretty much consists of browsing and social media apps and a decent camera. I don't game on phone.
Wondering which one to buy. I just need a phone that is a smooth UX. No stutter or lag on basic usage and multi-tasking.
Heard Moto G4 Plus' Camera problem, that is gets hot and takes time to focus?
Is Moto X Style(16GB variant) really worth it for extra $90?
Let´s make it easier, what about g4 plus vs x play? Dont answer on comparisons from the spec/ info etc , I'm looking for the input from someone that have used the 2 phones if possible ... battery life, screen quality ...
Thanx