Dear All,
I have seen that out device gives less speed as compared to other devices (e.g MI and Iphones). Can you please comment with top speed you have got on mobile data and also ROM details.
I have seen Iphone give 7 Mbps,
MI phones giving 3 Mbps
And our device (Arrow PIE) 1.5 Mbps on same network (Jio)
I saw 20 megabyte / second at good signal. Now i'm using miui but not that good for network' speed.
nonamesry said:
I saw 20 megabyte / second at good signal. Now i'm using miui but not that good for network' speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On which ROM did you get 20 Mbps?
My high speed download was 64 mbps on mobile data.
My speed is about 10MP/s
majidpink said:
My high speed download was 64 mbps on mobile data.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ROM and network plz
seking said:
My speed is about 10MP/s
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ROM and network plz
kushal.purkar said:
ROM and network plz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jaguar ROM latest and Jio
Today the speed
Vodafone on jaguar
Device :- Z2 Plus 4GB
Baseband/firmware :- 1.70 from Zui 4.0.xxx
ROM :- Any Custom ROM (Oreo or Pie)
Network :- Reliance Jio 4G (India)
Location :- Kolkata and tested other places too..
Now this is very subjective as we all know with network performance and load.
But Z2 Plus isn't slow in any sense compare to other phones when it comes to LTE performance.
Thanks..
NaXal said:
Device :- Z2 Plus 4GB
Baseband/firmware :- 1.70 from Zui 4.0.xxx
ROM :- Any Custom ROM (Oreo or Pie)
Network :- Reliance Jio 4G (India)
Location :- Kolkata and tested other places too..
Now this is very subjective as we all know with network performance and load.
But Z2 Plus isn't slow in any sense compare to other phones when it comes to LTE performance.
Thanks..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what rom?
sanjay.2704 said:
what rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have or I posted screenshot from one particular ROM doesn't mean that it's the fastest.
I have seen similar if not better results with most of the ROMs that I have tried.
So namely,
Oreo :- AEX/PE/AiCP.. Few others, I have forgotten..
Pie :- AEX/PixysOS(present setup)
For my setup and test locations, ROM or kernel never mattered. They all performed similar. Network strength, and load in network are the main factors for me to see the different speed. It's all on backend hardware and their capabilities. If network is fast enough, if testing server is fast enough, Z2 Plus does hit some insane speeds.
Only difference for internet performance that I cry on is with 2.4GHz WiFi performance since many ROMs for some reason come with link limited to 72mbps where as some are capable of hitting full 150mbps link.
We have detailed discussion on this if you remember regarding 2.4GHz channel bonding and root solutions for force enabling it on those certain restricted ROMs..
I have few insane 5.8GHz speed test results but unfortunately I am still searching for them. Took them on a night shift at office when we removed all speed restrictions for fun.. lol..
NaXal said:
I have or I posted screenshot from one particular ROM doesn't mean that it's the fastest.
I have seen similar if not better results with most of the ROMs that I have tried.
So namely,
Oreo :- AEX/PE/AiCP.. Few others, I have forgotten..
Pie :- AEX/PixysOS(present setup)
For my setup and test locations, ROM or kernel never mattered. They all performed similar. Network strength, and load in network are the main factors for me to see the different speed. It's all on backend hardware and their capabilities. If network is fast enough, if testing server is fast enough, Z2 Plus does hit some insane speeds.
Only difference for internet performance that I cry on is with 2.4GHz WiFi performance since many ROMs for some reason come with link limited to 72mbps where as some are capable of hitting full 150mbps link.
We have detailed discussion on this if you remember regarding 2.4GHz channel bonding and root solutions for force enabling it on those certain restricted ROMs..
I have few insane 5.8GHz speed test results but unfortunately I am still searching for them. Took them on a night shift at office when we removed all speed restrictions for fun.. lol..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I meant to ask what rom is this.. coz looking for rom change .
May be will go back to crdroid oreo
I am aware that most roms only differ in ui and the ux developed by Devs and the sources.. everything else is same behind the scene.. coz all is android.. and hardware being same as well..
Small incident .. at my place I get maximum 30-40kbps.. sometime in evening can't even open XDA .. internet is soo slow.. 4G JiO.. but this weekend I was getting 3.5-4 and even 5 Mbps ... So I know it's not the rom .
Just FYi, syberia supports 150 mbps
@sanjay.2704
I am presently with PixysOS. You may not like it due to the lack of customisation but for me, it's good enough to configure the phone just the way I want it.
Over-all excellent performance or battery backup.
NaXal said:
@sanjay.2704
I am presently with PixysOS. You may not like it due to the lack of customisation but for me, it's good enough to configure the phone just the way I want it.
Over-all excellent performance or battery backup.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just moved back to crdroid..
I got this with msm xtended
In my college I have a 802.11n standard network wifi, I usually get around 120-130 mbps.
While on jio I get atmost 1 mbps without carrier aggression, but if my network switches to carrier aggression then sppeds are way higher(depends on location atleast 5mbps to even 30+mbps)
Rahil4321 said:
In my college I have a 802.11n standard network wifi, I usually get around 120-130 mbps.
While on jio I get atmost 1 mbps without carrier aggression, but if my network switches to carrier aggression then sppeds are way higher(depends on location atleast 5mbps to even 30+mbps)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mobile network data speeds are really subjective of multiple factors.. Mainly the location. Since parameters effecting the performance and speed at every location is bit different.
For example in my home, network of most of the service providers are really strong. My primary network Jio performs really great even within indoor locations. Crossing 70+ mbps regularly at night hours.
Sadly if I walk up just 800m to our local club and Jio crawls and struggle to even touch 1 mbps !! Usually stays at around that 300/500kbps mark there.. Did multiple complains from multiple users but Reliance always admits their inability to fix due to so called high demand and excess number of users at that given location.
Idea 4g on viperos 8.1 oreo
Related
Just came back to the evo after leaving for Verizon and the evo I got seems to be slower than I remember. I was wondering on average how long it takes everyone else to load web pages and such mine loads fairly quickly but like i said not quite as fast as i remembered them. Also my YouTube app barely loads videos in hq they just sit and takes forever to load. Wondering if their might be something wrong with the phone that its not that fast or am I just remembering this phone being faster than it is. I love this phone i never wanted to get rid of it in the first place and if this is the way its supposed to be then so be it but i just want to make sure that everything is ok and in working order.
These all sound like quality of service issues, which could vary widely depending on signal strength, amount of bandwidth available, and of course whether or not you're on 3G, 4G or wifi.
It's hard to really troubleshoot something without any facts or details, maybe you can start with a speedtest for network speed and a CPU test for the actual phone speed. There are both in the market.
It said my cpu speed is 662.40Mhz and my speedtest is 581kbps download and 523kbps upload.
Also these test were done on 3g. 4g isn't very reliable in my area.
jhnnyblze2000 said:
It said my cpu speed is 662.40Mhz and my speedtest is 581kbps download and 523kbps upload.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CPU speed seems low as it is rated for 998MHZ stock. speed seems about right for 3g sadly
Not sure if I used the right program though so i could have givin the wrong number from the test what is the best program to do a cpu test? I used 2 different programs one was cpu benchmark that gave 998mhz and the first one i used was android cpu tester which gave the 662.40mhz. Should i take it back and try and get a new one or is this normal i'm not sure whats up or if its just me.
jhnnyblze2000 said:
Not sure if I used the right program though so i could have givin the wrong number from the test what is the best program to do a cpu test? I used 2 different programs one was cpu benchmark that gave 998mhz and the first one i used was android cpu tester which gave the 662.40mhz. Should i take it back and try and get a new one or is this normal i'm not sure whats up or if its just me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your CPU is fine. Just do a quadrant test, you should get ~1200-1300 stock.
Youtube/website not loading is because you are on a slow 3G connection.
Thanks for the help everyone i did the quadrant test 3 times first time i got 1191 but the second and third time i got 1296 so my phone looks like it is working the way it is supposed to. Just wanted to say thanks to everyone that helped me out on this.
so... why did you go.. and why you come back?
the 3g speeds seam a little slow...
it should be double that in download...
maybe.. it is just busier of late.
Dan330 said:
so... why did you go.. and why you come back?
the 3g speeds seam a little slow...
it should be double that in download...
maybe.. it is just busier of late.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4G + EVO = bad a$$
I thought the download speed seemed low too but I would think that has to do with the network and not my phone.
Today i was looking all over for the best tethering app that could at least let me watch youtube with out freezing to day i used wireless tether cm7 hotspot nothing gave me anything over 1 mb down (used speed test.net app) so i went to google andriod wifi tehter project under downloads and downloaded the experimental v3pre 12 apk and the speed differ from 2-3mb and .90 up( uploads speed where always the same nomatter what app i used) im using sprint lover rom stock kernal if anyone has anything better please let me know. Also mane factor under setting in the app go to change device profile and use samsung epic 4g . auto or htc evo are slower didnt try all, but these three, let me know if any of phones are better to choose from thanxz.
First, run a speed test from your phone. If you are only getting 2-3 mbps on your phone, you won't get any faster than that tethering
Sent from my HTC EVO 4G with Tapatalk
i get 9-10mb down and 1 mb capp speeds device tethering to is 2-4mb down 1 up
This thread is to showcase before and after speed increase/decrease that you may get from using either one of the Kernels that have this implemented..
I request you do the following..
1: State your Rom
2: State your Kernel
3: State your before speed
4: program used to verify speed
This thread is not a Q&A thread..
It is also not a thread about which is the best Kernel to use..
It is a thread that the developers can refer to to get an idea whether it is worth while to implement "Veno" and or any other Wireless coding to help improve input & output of our devices and the wireless chips/programming that supports them..
I will quote ricardopvz.. if he does not mind.. (Ricardo.. PM me if you have a problem with this)
Wifi is definitely better with test16. Where I had 36Mbps, now I have 54Mbps.
Page loading may be a little faster, but needs some more testing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=25136849&postcount=721
dgcruzing said:
I request you do the following..
1: State your Rom
2: State your Kernel
3: State your before speed
4: program used to verify speed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using the same application for testing internet speed and benchmark for result consistency... like quadrant & speedtest.net..
Here is the result after veno:
Megatron v 1.0.4 @ 1600mhz
Guevor test16 - veno
Speedtest.net
download - 1986kbps
upload - 372kbps
Quadrant score - 4069
will post shortly after flashing other kernels...
AOKP Build 33
1.504mhz - 216mhz - Interactive
Test16 kernel
SIO (M.S) read ahead 2048kb
SD read ahead 1024kb
Dalvik byte code false build.prop tweaks etc
wifi bluetooth etc untouched
Before veno and after veno no difference at all in fact in most speed tests veno got slightly less but then seemed a little quicker in other respects eg browsing at times so the tests did not help me make a definative decision.
I really don't know what to think on this but I would like to see more improvements like this and see our kernels and all round speed improve
Sorry in advance for any spelling mistakes AOKP still has a borked autocorrect and my spelling lacks in every respect lol
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using XDA Premium HD app
1 - ARHD 3.2.0
2 - TastyMehIcs .8 (before) 1.0 (After)
3- Before 8Mbps After 12Mbps
4- Speedtest.net app.
The real improvement seemed to be in responsiveness, link clicks aren't lost asmuch
Megatron v 1.0.4 @ 1200mhz
Guevor test15 & test16
Speedtest.net
Measurements:
Time Download Upload Ping Server
test15
1:38PM 3347kbps 1615kbps 47ms Veendam
1:39PM 3328kbps 1560kbps 51ms Veendam
1:41PM 3183kbps 1595kbps 20ms Mechelen
test16
1:44PM 3146kbps 1566kbps 17ms Mechelen
1:45PM 3092kbps 1639kbps 19ms Mechelen
1:56PM 3285kbps 1629kbps 17ms Mechelen
back to test15
2:08PM 6367kbps 1628kbps 22ms Mechelen
2:09PM 4434kbps 1592kbps 19ms Mechelen
2:14PM 3030kbps 1330kbps 19ms Mechelen
As you can see time and server can have an influence on the results, so you can't just do one measurement before and one after to make a conclusion.
Yes, I am having this thought too..
Was going though test programs yesterday..
At this stage "ping" can only be the true medium you can test this.
Or using a samba drive attached to your WiFi network and download upload the same file and different kernel settings using a monitor program to get average speeds..
As using results from multi pads connected to the internet brings too many variables into the data..
i.e..users downstream internet speed once it leaves the local network..
What we really want is "local" WiFi to pad increases.. as its the tweaking of this that will allow for incremental increases (hopefully) of the user experience in the downstream leg of the connection.
sent from yet another MikG HTC Evo
Am I the only one that can't connect my N10 @ 300mbit on 5ghz with the newer ROMs (Paranoid Android excluded)? I've tried Liquid, Carbon, PAC, etc - Paranoid is the only build with support. All others max out at 130. 300mbit is important if streaming from the NAS (main purpose of my tablet). Hopefully some of the devs will read this. I have an Asus rtn-66u. Tried different (lower channels), channel width, legacy/n only, you name it. PA passes with flying colors - help?
The actual speed is no where near 300 mbps anyway so it shouldn't matter. I haven't seen the Nexus 10 able to pull more than a stable 40~ mbps even if you get within 5 feet and line of sight of the router with your hands out of the way and the antennae of both devices lined up with each other. The wifi in these tablets is just that bad.
A standard compressed 1080p movie is usually a total of 20 mbps anyway, and a full bluray version is normally 30 mbps of data I think.
The link speed should still be able to be reported as 300 if it is using both antenna? I'm just wondering if something was overlooked on these other roms that PA gets right. I guess I could compare real world ftp vs the seperate ROMs and report back.
OK. Carbon ROM @130mbit on 5ghz 500mb file, max ftp 6100Kb/sec.
PA @ 300mbit 5ghz same 500mb file, ftp was 7200Kb/sec. Just one test, should be done at least seven times, but 1Mb/sec is a difference. Back with PA.
The main question is does it make that big of difference? I mean I can stream the 1440p timescapes video over my 2.4 wireless n router at 65mbit and it looks just as great as if it was on the tablet itself...
At 130 you should be able to do about anything...
I dont know Mabey I just don't understand...
the_boo said:
The main question is does it make that big of difference? I mean I can stream the 1440p timescapes video over my 2.4 wireless n router at 65mbit and it looks just as great as if it was on the tablet itself...
At 130 you should be able to do about anything...
I dont know Mabey I just don't understand...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you stream using ftp or dnla/smb? Wish I could figure out NFS to get it working.
Either way, where did the 300mbit go?
My Nexus connects on the 5 GHz band just fine, wifi shows 270 Mbps link speed, and a quick test I just did got me 12.200 kbps in download (this is with an emule client also running on the same line).
Rom is latest MrRobinson's AOKP PUB with KTManta kernel.
Tried Mr Robinson's aroma aokp with ktmanta kernel. Wifi performance was pretty much half (maxed at 3000Kbytes/sec). Connection was reported as 130mbit. What channel settings are you using on your router?
Flashed back to PA and I'm back to 7000Kbytes+.
xrecartp said:
Tried Mr Robinson's aroma aokp with ktmanta kernel. Wifi performance was pretty much half (maxed at 3000Kbytes/sec). Connection was reported as 130mbit. What channel settings are you using on your router?
Flashed back to PA and I'm back to 7000Kbytes+.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's on auto; right now using channel 44.
I must say wifi analyzer only shows my access point, so there are probably no collisions, and the router is about a meter from me (but with two monitors in the line of sight).
Arcano said:
It's on auto; right now using channel 44.
I must say wifi analyzer only shows my access point, so there are probably no collisions, and the router is about a meter from me (but with two monitors in the line of sight).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What channel width? 20, 20/40, or 40? Back on AOKP trying every combination.
Hard for me to believe your tablet is reporting 270. Picture or it didn't happen j/k.
*pulls hair out*
xrecartp said:
What channel width? 20, 20/40, or 40? Back on AOKP trying every combination.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My router does not have such a setting, only "up to 54 Mbps", "up to 130 Mbps" and "up to 300 Mbps".
But looking at 802.11n specs I would imagine that means it is using a channel width of 40.
Well, thanks for trying to to help. Tried the lower channels. Even tried turning encryption off (open system). 130 seems to be the ceiling for me on these other ROMs. I really liked the feel of Robinson's AOKP.
xrecartp said:
Hard for me to believe your tablet is reporting 270. Picture or it didn't happen j/k.
*pulls hair out*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here you are, a screenshot showing my wifi connection, and the speed test.
It's in Spanish, but I guess you will be able to understand it.
(I've masked out identifiable data).
Arcano said:
Here you are, a screenshot showing my wifi connection, and the speed test.
It's in Spanish, but I guess you will be able to understand it.
(I've masked out identifiable data).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the info.
Just don't understand why stock and PA seem to function differently.
*workaround* When I am on USA region WiFi, 5ghz only reaches 130mbit. When I "lie" and tell the ROM I am in Brazil (lol) , I can obtain the full 300 Mbit connection. Maybe you can pass this onto the other devs. Must be a bug.
Pardon me, but how do I change the country setting ?
Sent from my Nexus 10 using xda app-developers app
Try a different kernel. franco.Kernel specifically has a newer WiFi driver which may or may not help out with speeds.
I have a NETGEAR R6200 (like 800mbit or something advertised speeds over some non-standardized kind of WiFi lol). Nexus 10 is only reporting 162mbit when connected over 5GHz, but I'm using rasbeanhjelly + Trinity (TX34).
Hey guys, I'm having issues with the Wi-Fi performance on my 910G. I'm on 5.1.1 and using emotion kernnel v24 beta, when watching YouTube videos, updating apps and what not, my download speed is slow. But this happens most of the time, sometimes I'll get bursts of full speed. Does anyone else experience bad Wi-Fi performance? I noticed when I tried the 6.0.1 rom the Wi-Fi performance was better.
And no, it's not my ISP or my router, as it works perfectly fine on every other device. Tried 2.4GHz and 5GHz, no real difference.
To be honest, I think the Wi-Fi driver goes to sleep when it's not being fully utilized, and seems to get stuck, is there a module update for the specific Wi-Fi card?
Thanks
jayden485 said:
Hey guys, I'm having issues with the Wi-Fi performance on my 910G. I'm on 5.1.1 and using emotion kernnel v24 beta, when watching YouTube videos, updating apps and what not, my download speed is slow. But this happens most of the time, sometimes I'll get bursts of full speed. Does anyone else experience bad Wi-Fi performance? I noticed when I tried the 6.0.1 rom the Wi-Fi performance was better.
And no, it's not my ISP or my router, as it works perfectly fine on every other device. Tried 2.4GHz and 5GHz, no real difference.
To be honest, I think the Wi-Fi driver goes to sleep when it's not being fully utilized, and seems to get stuck, is there a module update for the specific Wi-Fi card?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you run speed test.net app to see what your speed is? How many users on your router? Have you analyzed which channels you are on versus your neighbors for interference? Start at all those first.
Sent from my SM-N910T using XDA Free mobile app
nine5raptor said:
Have you run speed test.net app to see what your speed is? How many users on your router? Have you analyzed which channels you are on versus your neighbors for interference? Start at all those first.
Sent from my SM-N910T using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it's not an issue with my network and it is not interference, as I live on a 2.5 acre block of land. When I speedtest it will reach the full speed 10/1mbps, and if I quickly switch into YouTube it will load quickly, but after a bit it just stalls again. There has to be some sort of driver/module issue with it.