Related
How about we start an official database for all benchmarking we can do on the Fascinate? Here is every free benching app I could find. My phone is stock 2.1 for now. After FroYo I plan on overclocking the piss outta this beast!
System info:
SGH-I500 Fascinate
non-root 2.1update1 Eclair
OS: 2.6.29
BogoMips: 997.7
Bone stock outta the box. Sorry no screengrabs since I haven't rooted the phone.
*An3DBench - 6581
*Quadrant - 878
*Neocore - 55.9fps
*Linnpack - MFLOPS 8.181 / Time 10.025 sec / Norm Res 5.68
*DroidBooster - 21.7218% increased performance
*CPU Benchmark - 799ms
*GPU Benchmark - Absolute - 34155 Relative - 31999
*NBench -
INTEGER INDEX : 13.977
FLOATING-POINT INDEX : 1.395
MEMORY INDEX : 2.915
INTEGER INDEX : 3.990
FLOATING-POINT INDEX : 0.774
*NENA - 50.4fps
*Caffeine Mark labs with DroidBooster - Raw 12777, 4.5 Stars, Rank - 9
*FPS2d - 1000 iterations. avg-55fps stdev-4.97fps
*CaffeineMark - 1805
*RLBenchmark
SQLite - SCH-I500 (SDK:7)
Benchmark Results:
1000 INSERTs - 63.337 sec
25000 INSERTs in a transaction - 3.852 sec
25000 INSERTs into an indexed table in a transaction - 4.612 sec
100 SELECTs without an index - 0.211 sec
100 SELECTs on a string comparison - 0.086 sec
Creating an index - 2.82 sec
5000 SELECTs with an index - 2.116 sec
1000 UPDATEs without an index - 9.648 sec
25000 UPDATEs with an index - 8.047 sec
INSERTs from a SELECT - 7.55 sec
DELETE without an index - 5.85 sec
DELETE with an index - 6.041 sec
DROP TABLE - 6.866 sec
Overall - 121.036 sec
*BenchmarkPI - 2702ms
*Speed PI - Calculated to 1,000,000 digits: 659ms act.
*SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark 0.9.1 - Best Score = 12300.1ms +/-2% (Best browser I benched was Dolphin HD, believe it or not. I benched it along with Skyfire Beta(close behind at 13983.5ms+/-6.6%), the newest FireFox Beta(way slower score over 26600ms), Opera Mobile(not too far off at 14050.0ms +/-4.6%), and NetFront Life(dismal at over 36000ms). And at least on my machine, today, with my Un-rooted stock 2.1, Dolphin HD has the fastest java based score among them all in SunSpider.)
*Eyes+Chrome - 22 Asterisk**
**Including thread title.
I fail to see the point of this thread. A forum thread is most certainly not a database for storing benchmark data, and that data itself is useless without any context. Unless you're comparing multiple ROMs, of the SF to other phones, the numbers are meaningless, and I see no comparisons being made here.
Now, if you file that data away, and present it again later in comparison with the numbers from the same tests on the official Froyo ROM (once it's released), then I will be somewhat interested. ;-)
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Haters...
Stock 2.1 Rooted with Voodoo lag fix
Quadrant: 1780
Instead of tearing down, why not contribute? Post up benchmarks of other ROMs.
Then we can compare.
I didn't say this thread was only for box stock SF devices.
My fascinates screen gave me a boner. That seems to be a common occurence. Slap that on there with benchmarks. BTW, not calling u a liar but I have NEVER seen neocore above 55.7. And I have a captivate as well,( well had). Odd. I'm all for it. I don't see why not, put up all the benchmarks from all the different ROMS.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
benchmarks mean very little on this phone. you can get huge quadrant scores from one of the old overclock voodoo kernels but they will not stand up to the newer non oc kernels in everyday use.
I've tried to overclock, lagfix, change roms and kernels, but I didn't see any big difference.
I would like to stay with real FPS benchmarks like GLBenchmark or others not like quadrant.
I've seen many people using ext2 instead of ext4, other say rfs is better, so I'm getting very confused. And also many people around here.
Each one of us has got a personalized SGS. Let's run each one of us GLBenchmark OpenGl 2.0 test without FSAA (The one of egypt) and see the results of each one of us.
Dlownload glbenchmark here: http://www.glbenchmark.com/download.jsp
Please specify model, rom, kernel, launcher, running apps, free mem before doing the test... Like every bit of info you can give, so we could find the best settings!
Thanks to all ! I'll run the test and post in few minutes!
Ok, here is the template 1.0 to use ;P just copy and paste and modify!
OK, got:
2438 Frames (21.6 Fps) with no fsaa.
My settings:
MODEL: European, I9000 SGS 16gb Vodafone
SPEED (GHZ): 1.0
LAUNCHER: Go Launcher
KERNEL: Lastest speed mod.
ROM: Darky's 8.0
LAGFIXES: On, System converted, on fast mount.
PROGRAMS INSTALLED: Very few, just wiped it.
FREE RAM: I forgot!
OTHER INFO: Wifi on, and overclock @ 1.2 makes worse FPS.
Lagfix will have no effect on glbench
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Bench marks do not say how responsive or laggy the phone is and unless you are obsessive with numbers are a waste of time .
jje
yes, but games performance is equal to FPS, so more FPS=More optimized system.
Just because that reason i proposed to use glbenchmark, as it is an only graphical test.
Here we go guys, new version of my BFS AOSP kernel (sense to come)
Been working hard on this kernel for quite some time, and Birdman helped out drastically (even though he broke stuff )
Big thanks to: Birdman, Slayher, Captainkrtek, Imoseyon (for the 2.6.35 port), Jake Day, Pershoot, and plenty of others I can't remember right now.
KangBang 0.8
Kanged workqueue 2.6.36.1 backport from Imoseyon
Kanged 3.0rc6 cpufreq/cpuidle backport from Imoseyon
Couple other adjustments
Added new CPU governor: LagFree. This new governor is based on conservative, and tweaked to lower the cpu frequency on suspend, and keep it over a minium value
during phone operation. This governor added some nice tweaks to be added to other governors, looking in to that.
Swap cache dropped more agressively via ck1 patch
More compiler optimizations
Decrease default dirty ratio via ck3 patch
Enable swaptoken only when swap is full via ck3 patch
Wifi voltage lowered
2.6.39 Conservative governor backported
Call Recording support added
2.6.39 bcm4329 (wifi) driver backported
Mecha: Add gan sound device.
Mecha: Allow varying of button backlight levels.
Mecha: Allow disabling of the back mic.
Mecha: Add gan sound device
Mecha: wifi: Improve BT-coex in A2DP mode
KangBang 0.7:
Added SmartAss back
Ondemand and interactive have sleep profiles again
Sound fix from birdman included
SLQB Memory Allocator re-added
KangBang 0.6:
Re-based to Ace kernel source, so I lost some of my changes for now (until i'm not so lazy and fix them)
There are a LOT of changes/additions.
Theres a new RCU boost, which is proving to be nice so far.
Changed the memory allocator to SLUB until I get SLQB ported in
As of right now, theres no auto sleep profile in ondemand/interactive. Both of these governors still need adjustments.
The clock frequencies are the default CM frequencies. Their table is populated correctly, and currently, I'm adding frequencies back in one at a time to make sure it will boot. This will take a while... bare with me guys
Lowered RR_Interval to 6 to increase latency. Might drop it to 4
Neon and VFP optimizations
OnDemand governor Threshold adjustments
CONFIG_HZ=300 instead of 100
Add Tiny Preempt RCU
RCU Boost Prio set to 50, Delay set to 300 (still playing with these)
Sound tweaks credit to CodeAurora/Birdman
GPU Memory allocation raised
Numerous fixes from CM kernel source
KangBang 0.5:
Reverted the GPU/Camera memory allocation adjustment, as it screwed up the camera.
Reverted to my old config file, as the extra slim one broke certain apps
Stabilized voltages
KangBang 0.4:
Full wifi/settings/MMS/etc. fix credit to beavis9k!!
Added V/R I/O Scheduler (still using BFQ as default for now)
BT Audio volume raised (Credit to Slayher)
Prevent memory leak on hotplug (thx Pershoot)
GPU/Camera memory allocations raised
Cleaned up my defconfig even more. This kernel is tiny, tinier than ever before. The actual kernel zImage is 1.9mb as opposed to the 2.2 it was before. This will allow a performance increase, as there is less the kernel is trying to crank out.
Initial release, 0.3:
Feature packed for the first release.
2.6.35.13 (latest upstream linux kernel)
System/Data/Cache mounted EXT4
Numerous EXT4 file system tweaks
Overclock up to 1.8 Ghz
Undervolted for battery life/stability
BFS v404 (HUGE performance increase from the v3xx BFS series)
Tiny RCU
SLQB Memory Allocator
BFQ v2rc1 I/O Scheduler (much nicer than the original BFQ)
Kernel speed defaulted to 1024, stock tbolt speed
OnDemand governor backported from 2.6.39, with sleep/wake code (kanged from Imoseyon's OnDemandX, thanks Imoseyon!)
Wifi driver updated to latest AOSP driver
AOSP-style BT driver (kanged from Slayher's kernel source, thanks Slayher!)
MULTIPLE fixes pulled in from CyanogenMod MSM7x30 kernel source (time compensation, ashmem flush, wifi n support, CPU-supported unaligned access, compensation for rounding on odd-frequency clocksources, etc.)
Interactive governor with sleep/wake code (kanged from interactiveX, thanks Imoseyon!)
Numerous BFS tweaks for better performance, and better support for android.
SD Card read-ahead buffer increased
FS read-ahead buffer increased
Some other things I probably can't remember right now (I should take better notes, I'll add more as I remember)
Whew. Pretty hefty initial release.
Secondly, I comply with GPL. Here is my source code. Feel free to kang away, just credit me, at least in your source if not anywhere else
http://bit.ly/lSXnZx
Now to the goodies:
Download link:
BFS:
http://bit.ly/nHxIV1
CFS:
not yet updated
Broken list in 2nd post, To Do List with it.
For the latest news/updates, or just to show some love, follow me on twitter! @Drod2169
If you like my work, please consider helping support my red bull addiction!
http://bit.ly/k5swff
Broken:
Car dock.
To Do List:
Sense/GB Sense/AOSP specific defconfigs
Add Simple I/O scheduler. V/R is already in, just not built with the kernel.
Add extra frequencies one at a time to make sure it will boot (WIP)
Looks like I have a new kernal to try out
Do I overclock the same way I overclock on IMO
Sent from my ThunderBolt using XDA App
dc iz 2 legit said:
Looks like I have a new kernal to try out
Sent from my ThunderBolt using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Post back your experiences, please
It's been an openish beta on twitter for a while, but this release version has quite a few nice additions.
I will bang this kang and let you know what's goodies.
Looking forward to the sense version - unless of course the cell standby battery drain issue is no longer there on CM7 using this kernel.
Big thanks to: Birdman, Slayher, Captainkrtek, Imoseyon (for the 2.6.35 port), Jake Day, and plenty of others I can't remember right now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
-.- ..........
Installed came from dream kernal...so far so good has alot of overclock options I'm on stock speeds right now right of the bat I notice its charging really quickly, no apps uninstalled yet
Edit: wifi connected right away but right when I turned it of had 3g
green but no data did reboot with wifi off and fixed
Edit: battery is really good on this kernal I'm getting 10min per percentage on medium to heavy use
Sent from my ThunderBolt using XDA App
FINALLY, about dam time!!
Will report back!!
Awesome work, cant wait for a sense version!
Berzerker7 said:
-.- ..........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jake's been a big help and support to me in my kernel work. He taught me a lot when I first got started, and he's been nothing short of a great guy. While you have your opinions, I will continue to respect the man. Please don't clutter the thread with this talk.
Wow man running super fast, wasn't planning on leaving stock, but this has surpassed my expectations. Thanks a lot!
Sent from my ThunderBolt using XDA App
Downloaded, will try later or tomorrow and post back.
Thanks for your hard work!
Data seems to be a little flakey. Performance is smooth, will report back on WiFi and battery life
Sent from my ThunderBolt using XDA App
Derrtydozen said:
Data seems to be a little flakey. Performance is smooth, will report back on WiFi and battery life
Sent from my ThunderBolt using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From what I can tell, data handoff seems to be A LOT LESS flaky than on other kernels. Battery life will the true test for me.
Unrelated but related: Anyone have LPP FC upon EVERY reboot now? Works fine after it has been restarted.
I have experienced this across kernels/voltages/governors/CPU freq.
Awesome, just loaded it up.
Preferred tweak method......CM settings, setcpu, does it have speedtweak?
Thanks!!!!
Sent from my ThunderBolt using XDA Premium App
So does wifi not work at all with this kernal?
Bimmer323 said:
Awesome, just loaded it up.
Preferred tweak method......CM settings, setcpu, does it have speedtweak?
Thanks!!!!
Sent from my ThunderBolt using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it does not.
I run ondemand governor, at min: 230mhz, max: 1024mhz (stock settings)
iastonish said:
So does wifi not work at all with this kernal?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
been told by numerous people it works flawlessy. if you have issues, try flashing imoseyon's fixwifi zip from his kernel thread
I stand corrected, data is working fine, WiFi is working fine, battery seems good. The true test for battery will be tomorrow for work
Sent from my ThunderBolt using XDA App
Hi Guys,
Like most of you I own a Iconia500 and I've tested a lot of ROM available on this forum. But hard to decide wich one to go with. the processing power is not all and the fluidity of the interface and the browsing are a lot more important to me.
So I've decided to test 6 Roms available on the forum with this:
Test protocol:
Fresh install
setcpu installed and locked to 1000Mhz
reboot and launch of the test
Here are the results:
Score 974 - ROM: Minimalist 3.1
Score 961 - ROM: Taboonay 1.0.6
Score 961 - ROM: Virtuous Thrive 1.0.1
Score 960 - ROM: HoneyVillain 1.04
Score 954 - ROM: Acer Stock Rom
Score 948 - ROM: Virtuous Picasso 1.1.0
Score 945 - ROM: Lightspeed 1.0
Score 940 - ROM: Virtuous Galaxy 1.0.5
Score 848 - ROM: Virtuous Xoom 1.1.2
I hope if helps,
Peace
and stock score ?
I got 954
sanaell said:
and stock score ?
I got 954
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, table updated.
Interesting tool, thanks for sharing. I get what you are after by comparing all ROMs at 1.0GHz, but don't forget that the more processing power you have (i.e. overclocking), the better your fluidity and browsing experience will be on any given ROM. I just ran a quick and dirty test (didn't reboot or anything) on my customized stock ROM with a 1.5GHz OC kernel with the "On Demand" governor (I used No-frills CPU control) and scored a 1222 with all bars being thicker than when running at 1.0GHz. Without overclocking I scored a 971. Even the stock kernel frequency tables are setup to be able to be OC'ed at 1.2GHz....so don't be afraid to goose that CPU a bit to get that tegra 2 performance you paid$ for
but OC = more power = less battery...
sanaell said:
but OC = more power = less battery...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but only when you are using it...after the web page has loaded the cpu scales frequency back down if you are setup properly. It really depends on how you use your tablet, but I don't notice much difference at all in battery life the way I use mine (web browsing with flash, email, occasional movies and games). I still have to charge it every night either way after 6-8hrs of heavy use. The screen takes far more battery than anything else...live wallpaper would likely take more battery per charge cycle than an on demand [email protected] depending on how you use your tablet. IMHO, OC'ing to 1.2GHz is a no-brainer unless you are one of those guys on the road that needs to get every minute of life out of it. If that is what you need, then the iconia probably wasn't the best tablet to buy. After you OC, it's hard to go back as flash/web pages etc. load quite a bit faster as shown by the benchmark test.
_motley said:
IMHO, OC'ing to 1.2GHz is a no-brainer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I disagree. I didn't notice enough of a difference to warrant the loss in battery. I rarely even play any games and the games I play already run at 30 fps without OC so why the need to OC at all?
WereCatf said:
I disagree. I didn't notice enough of a difference to warrant the loss in battery. I rarely even play any games and the games I play already run at 30 fps without OC so why the need to OC at all?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Battery drain would depend on which kernel and governor you used and how you use your tablet. Some kernel sources I have studied have their OC current set higher than is necessary. The one posted by Richard Trip/Roggin is very reasonable by default and you can even adjust uV by frequency to improve battery usage. The games you mention are likely using the tegra GPU/hardware, so the OC won't help you a bit there. I noticed the performance the most with flash loading on web pages. Give me a little more power on demand and I am a happy camper. If you really need that extra few minutes of battery, then I can understand. But, think about it...if you are browsing a lot, you can do more within a shorter period of time so it all comes out the same in the end.
I did a comparison @ same frequency to be a base for real comparison, you can overclock or use custom kernel, still, it is just a base
_motley said:
But, think about it...if you are browsing a lot, you can do more within a shorter period of time so it all comes out the same in the end.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My reading speed isn't affected by the clockspeed of my tablet, so I'll still spend the same amount of time on a website..
WereCatf said:
My reading speed isn't affected by the clockspeed of my tablet, so I'll still spend the same amount of time on a website..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When you are reading after it has loaded, the clock speed is the same as stock...it doesn't stay pegged at the OC speed all the time, the on-demand governor takes care of that for you
agreed but still the reaction is not instantaneous and some people just want to play with overclocking.
I found the benchmark tool interesting because it does not focus on pure force power but on user perception of the interface and after all I am a user
OP updated with a new ROM
Welcome .
Here you can download my two self-compiled Omni builds, used as a base for ArchiDroid 2.X.
In comparision with official nightly:
a) Added Dark Omni (TRDS) [WIP]
b) Added All Animation Control [WIP]
c) Compiled with Google's GCC Toolchain 4.8 (instead of original 4.7)
The only difference between these two builds is one mysterious change, not listed above, which will be revealed after a week of blind tests.
It's up to you to decide which build performs/works better.
Some notes:
1. As stated above, both builds are compiled with the same toolchain. So it's not a toolchain-fight.
2. Kernel isn't affected in any way, feel free to change kernel to anyone working with official nightly OmniROM, including Boeffla, Yank, Devil, Googy, or anything you want.
I listed 4 categories in the poll:
- Performance
- Battery
- Stability
- Overall / Your Choice
Please select which build works for you better in every category. If you can't feel any difference you can select both choices, or noone, up to you.
You have one week for tests. You can test these builds through any method you want, any benchmarks you want and any placebo you want . Just please, spend at least some time with every build before judging. It's important for me.
Mysterious Build #1
Mysterious Build #2
Have fun.
are this stable?
terror09 said:
are this stable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't face a single problem on any of these, but I can't assure you that they're stable as rock.
kuci06 said:
I bet that one MYSTERIOUS change is a botnet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While I can't tell you what exactly has been changed (yet), feel free to reverse engineer on your own whatever you want .
No, it's not a botnet .
I guess the changed one is the bigger file
testing in progress!!
Looks fun. I will give it a try.this weekend.
I'll give it a try without a full wipe.
Do these come with gapps (suppose not but rather ask before others do)? @JustArchi Did you feel the difference?
Choristav said:
I'll give it a try without a full wipe.
Do these come with gapps (suppose not but rather ask before others do)? @JustArchi Did you feel the difference?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't tell you my thoughts, as this is the whole purpose of testing. No, it's base only, about ~180 MB flashable zip. The same as Omni nightly, just with 3-4 additional modifications.
archi want me to test it also on f2fs file system or its better not to do i am pretty sure i can find the change or tge addon..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
mhb92 said:
archi want me to test it also on f2fs file system or its better not to do i am pretty sure i can find the change or tge addon..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can test it on f2fs as well if you want, just keep in mind that this ROM does not use f2fs-friendly method, as all changes to Omni are listed in the OP.
JustArchi said:
You can test it on f2fs as well if you want, just keep in mind that this ROM does not use f2fs-friendly method, as all changes to Omni are listed in the OP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hehe ok ok.. the two builds are using the same change ? u have build a very nice game here
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
mhb92 said:
hehe ok ok.. the two builds are using the same change ? u have build a very nice game here
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both of these builds have 3 changes listed in the OP.
One from these builds has extra one mysterious change compared to other one. This is low-level change, which affects the overall system and will be revealed after tests.
JustArchi said:
Both of these builds have 3 changes listed in the OP.
One from these builds has extra one mysterious change compared to other one. This is low-level change, which affects the overall system and will be revealed after tests.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
gonna test now..i ll report soon i hope
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
build 1 does seem snappier...
Well, they differ, that's for sure. But it's up to you to decide which one is better .
For me build 2
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9300 mit Tapatalk
good works :good:
i'll mixs it with other kernel to my experiment
voted.
My test result is follow.
Suggest to test it yourself first, before seeing the results. Continue?
---ArchiDroid V1.7.9---
My daily drive as comparison to Mysterious builds.
Full wipe, with all apps installed
Boeffla kernel
no overclock, max CPU 1400MHz, undervolt -25mV
-- Performace --
Total Score 19473
UX Multitask 3356
UX Runtime 1260
CPU integer 2263
CPU float-point 1258
RAM Operation 1769
RAM Speed 1144
GPU 2D 1619
GPU 3D 4997
-- Battery --
Sleep overnight 9h,
Result [1]: Total -1%, Deep sleep 8h51m, 200Mhz 2m, -0.1%/hr
Passive scenario: wifi on, screen on, Antutu benchmark + Chrome 10 minutes, screen off 50 mins
result: Deep sleep 42m, 200Mhz 3m, battery -6.1%/hr
-- Stability/Smoothness --
9/10
-- Multi task --
Broken, 1 average game with get restart upon openning message app.
---JustArchi's Mysterious builds 1 and 2---
Full wipe, clean rom
Stock Kernel
Stock settings
Default brightness
Reboot before testing
Spend 1 day on each rom to perform the following test
-- Performace [1] and [2] --
Total 18842 | 18703
UX Multitask 3287 | 3413 (better)
UX Runtime 1264 | 1254
CPU integer 2270 | 2264
CPU float-point 1730 | 1658
RAM Operation 1786 | 1766
RAM Speed 1116 | 1037
GPU 2D 1293 | 1245
GPU 3D 4494 | 4463
Winner: [1]
-- Battery --
Sleep overnight 9h,
Result [1]: Total -30%, 200MHz 58m, 400Mhz 7h17m, 500Hz 38m, -3.3%/hr
Result [2]: Total -6%, Deep sleep 8h 48m, -0.7/hr
Passive scenario: wifi on, screen on, running Antutu benchmark once + Chrome 10 minutes, screen off 50 mins
Result [1]: Total -8%, Deep sleep 49m, 200MHz 2m, 400Mhz 2m, -8%/hr
Result [2]: Total -6%, Deep sleep 54m, 200Mhz 3m, 400MHz 2m, -5.3%/hr
Active Scenario: Game 10 mins, 720p video 10 mins, screen off music 10 mins
Result [1]: Total -15%, 28.3%/hr
Result [2]: Total -11%, 20.8%/hr
Winner: [2]
-- Stability/Smoothness --
Result [1]: 9/10
Result [2]: 9/10
Winner: Draw
-- Multi task --
Result [1] & [2]: Excellent. Can handle 1 medium game and 4 other apps maximum without restarting app.
Free ram after reboot, 300 MB
-- Issue --
Result [1] & [2]: One hot reboot while using camera, lags on VLC player app.
-- Conclusion --
Both rom have been tested on full wipe, stock rom, stock kernel, default setting and after reboot.
Rom [1] has better performance and [2] has better battery life.
In the "sleep overnight" test, there is something in [1] that make it can't deepsleep and have 400MHz over 7 hours.
S3 itself has very good spec for performance, Onmi has add its wing on both build to add multitask feature possible,
and my most concern would be battery life.
Therefore, in my test, overall winer is [2]
deepgrass said:
voted.
My test result is follow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Highly appreciated mate .