Hi everybody can you please help me what is the best custom kernel for n910c performance and battery spacelemon,h-vitamin or suemax kernel pleaseeeee reply asapp pleaseeee
MAKUPAL12 said:
Hi everybody can you please help me what is the best custom kernel for n910c performance and battery spacelemon,h-vitamin or suemax kernel pleaseeeee reply asapp pleaseeee
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Squeaking like pliiiiiizzzz and ASAP would not help you.
What help you (and others like you) is to READ and TEST. No one will know but you what you want from the kernel.
Or the phone - performance and battery (long lasting battery I suppose) don't go well in the same sentence.
So go ahead, read the bloody threads and try to think in order to take a decision.
Spacelemon is very good along with Synapse where u can tweak many things. But again, if u want speed and performance - this comes with cost of the battery juice.
And don't be lazy, READ.
w41ru5 said:
Squeaking like pliiiiiizzzz and ASAP would not help you.
What help you (and others like you) is to READ and TEST. No one will know but you what you want from the kernel.
Or the phone - performance and battery (long lasting battery I suppose) don't go well in the same sentence.
So go ahead, read the bloody threads and try to think in order to take a decision.
Spacelemon is very good along with Synapse where u can tweak many things. But again, if u want speed and performance - this comes with cost of the battery juice.
And don't be lazy, READ.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but what do you most prefer bro? please prefer just 1 kernel
Related
Boston android ( Z71 )
kernel GINGERBREAD - 2.6.35.9-cyanomodgen (Battery Drain)
system GINGERBREAD - CM7
speed cpu 864 Mhz
battery - 22h-24h
kernel 2.6.32.9 ( Froyo ) - 2.6.32.9-SuperAosp [email protected] #2
system GINGERBREAD - CM7
speed cpu 864 Mhz
battery - 64h-70h
see 1d 4h battery 69 %
same config
identical speed both system
.. and why have you put this here ? It have nothing about Galaxy S which doesn't have an ARM v6 SoC.
180mb ram..:O
weird..
Another "wtf" thread from you.
Not good.
~drz
.Slane. said:
.. and why have you put this here ? It have nothing about Galaxy S which doesn't have an ARM v6 SoC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because my SGS with android 2.3.3 poor battery ohh
and my 2 boston is ok with kernel froyo and android 2.3.3
my HTC Desize HD is ok
the problem is kernel
What the purpose with this thread? kernel on armv6 chipset are very different... -." sorry useless i think
Sent from my GT-I9000
My20 said:
Because my SGS with android 2.3.3 poor battery ohh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
of course but not necessary ... i think SGS have more power on Processor 1gHZ and this one factor for more consumption power i think.. but if you move on 2.3.3 with new kernel version .35 you have better batteey life..
if u have battery drain ....calibrate your battery after flashing rom
Sent from my GT-I9000
derrzredeem said:
Another "wtf" thread from you.
Not good.
~drz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
instead "+Another "wtf"+"
trying to help, ok ?
try use another android phone, ok ?
with such people, the SGS always back
bududroid said:
of course but not necessary ... i think SGS have more power on Processor 1gHZ and this one factor for more consumption power i think.. but if you move on 2.3.3 with new kernel version .35 you have better batteey life..
if u have battery drain ....calibrate your battery after flashing rom
Sent from my GT-I9000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SGS android 2.3.3 Processor 1gHZ battery 18h-24h, oppss poor
try use kernel Froyo, stop here for my help, solution ?
as friend derrzredeem to help
android phone is not only SGS
My20 said:
instead "+Another "wtf"+"
trying to help, ok ?
try use another android, ok ?
with such people, the SGS always back
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok your posts make no sense and your threads are useless. Just stop posting.
Same story here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=980495&page=109
PS Very confusing
mermigas said:
Same story here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=980495&page=109
PS Very confusing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly friend and another forum
My20 said:
instead "+Another "wtf"+"
trying to help, ok ?
try use another android phone, ok ?
with such people, the SGS always back
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hence a bit rude earlier, but it is the second thread from you which is pointless.
Instead of creating a new thread, you could do some research how to improve your battery life.
You should know, that CM7 for GT-i9000 is still in heavy development and the CM7 guys is putting their best effort to solve this issue(s) + they just got the GB source, which i think is going to improve CM7.
The simple way to get rid your drain, is to flash another ROM
derrzredeem said:
Hence a bit rude earlier, but it is the second thread from you which is pointless.
Instead of creating a new thread, you could do some research how to improve your battery life.
You should know, that CM7 for GT-i9000 is still in heavy development and the CM7 guys is putting their best effort to solve this issue(s) + they just got the GB source, which i think is going to improve CM7.
The simple way to get rid your drain, is to flash another ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
know how to put the battery to operate 32h-36h
END post
solution? gets to me, can ruin your SGS
Kernel Tk-Glitch is very good kernel ... some corrections
END post
___________________
Galaxy S 16 Gb
CM7/MIUI 2.3.3
kernel +
battery 40h
Seriously, how old are you My20? Just asking.
So we're all in agreement that this was the most useless thread in XDA history?
And My20 is the most useless member in XDA history.
Furry Atom said:
So we're all in agreement that this was the most useless thread in XDA history?
And My20 is the most useless member in XDA history.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
10chars
My20 said:
solution? gets to me, can ruin your SGS
Kernel Tk-Glitch is very good kernel ... some corrections
END post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Flash JVK or JVB, the battery life on those is great.
btw. It's a bit hard to understand what you want. Yould you update the threadtitle?
also to all other posters on this thread:
Look, if he's trolling being offensive won't do any good. If he's honestly trying to find a solution for a problem rudeness won't help either. Pleas watch your tone or don't post. as far as I remember we're all here to help each other.
How many times is this guy going to pop up and spread his nonsense around?
Sure, the first few times it might have been comical, but now it's just sad bordering on aggravating.
Hi every one,
I tried to post this to the main thread of the kernal, but i could not since i am new member.
I just flash my new S4 I9500 to "Adam Kernel".
Main thing i noticed that the phone respond was better, and i really cant judged about other stuff since i did not use it.
But when i tired to test the phone with Antutu benchmark, noticed that the score was dropped from 281xx to 276xx, even when i am using the Performance instate of on-demand or other battery save options.
I hope if someone can help me to understand this.
Thank you very much,
Emad
rubema said:
Hi every one,
I tried to post this to the main thread of the kernal, but i could not since i am new member.
I just flash my new S4 I9500 to "Adam Kernel".
Main thing i noticed that the phone respond was better, and i really cant judged about other stuff since i did not use it.
But when i tired to test the phone with Antutu benchmark, noticed that the score was dropped from 281xx to 276xx, even when i am using the Performance instate of on-demand or other battery save options.
I hope if someone can help me to understand this.
Thank you very much,
Emad
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i don't see why you should be upset over benchmarks.
Benchmarks *can* give you an indication of performance, but *nothing* is better than simply making your own objective decision.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
saywhatt said:
i don't see why you should be upset over benchmarks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
Thank you for your reply.
Actually i am not upset quz of the benchmark result, all what i want to know in that case, is the new kernal give me less cpu power that the original?
I am only wondering..
Thank you,
its probably due to Governors change.
Adam kernel tweaked cpu governors to be power a power saver than performance. if you have Wanamlite rom you can manualy set cpu governors so you will see better benchmarks
zetlaw said:
its probably due to Governors change.
Adam kernel tweaked cpu governors to be power a power saver than performance. if you have Wanamlite rom you can manualy set cpu governors so you will see better benchmarks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oky i understand it, in that way.
Thank you 1+
Hi guys, Getting delivery of my nice new N4 tomorrow and already looked out the custom roms I fancy trying but I saw some videos with people describing lagging in some games, which is most likely explained by this video (which the forum won't let me post) ...
Youtube url = abf7nPiUUE8
In it, the presenter explains what thermal throttling Google has applied to stop the phone bursting into flames and killing everyone.
My question is, as the title says, do all the custom roms respect these thermal throttling values or will I find custom rom makers changing these to dangerous values just so their rom has the illusion of much more speed and performance of other roms even though this would come at the cost of possible bricking/destroying your phone and possibly injuring you or putting your life in danger.
Sorry if I made it sound over-dramatic.
djsubterrain said:
Hi guys, Getting delivery of my nice new N4 tomorrow and already looked out the custom roms I fancy trying but I saw some videos with people describing lagging in some games, which is most likely explained by this video (which the forum won't let me post) ...
Youtube url = abf7nPiUUE8
In it, the presenter explains what thermal throttling Google has applied to stop the phone bursting into flames and killing everyone.
My question is, as the title says, do all the custom roms respect these thermal throttling values or will I find custom rom makers changing these to dangerous values just so their rom has the illusion of much more speed and performance of other roms even though this would come at the cost of possible bricking/destroying your phone and possibly injuring you or putting your life in danger.
Sorry if I made it sound over-dramatic.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, you made it very dramatic. No dev will intentionaly build a rom or kernel to fry your cpu just to get higher clock speeds or benchmark results. Undervolting with a custom kernel will save you from some heat issues also.
gee2012 said:
Yes, you made it very dramtic. No dev will intentionaly build a rom or kernel to fry your cpu just to get higher clock speeds or benchmark results. Undervolting with a custom kernel will save you from a some heat issues also.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the answer although you didn't actually answer my query, I was wondering if someone could check their custom rom and tell me if the same file is there, with the same values as Google had set, just so I can confirm if custom rom designers use the same values.
djsubterrain said:
Thanks for the answer although you didn't actually answer my query, I was wondering if someone could check their custom rom and tell me if the same file is there, with the same values as Google had set, just so I can confirm if custom rom designers use the same values.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why not just look yourself? It is not that hard to DL a rom and have a look.
none of the kernels(yes, kernels not roms. roms have nothing tio do with it) disable thermal throttle, many raise the limit slightly though. but, there are many of us, like me, that chose to disable thermal throttle manually. and no, your phone wont burst into flames and explode. there still exists a safety, when you hit this safety temp of 100C, the phone will automatically turn off. yes, its safe to get that hot. and you will never ever reach that temp if you arent just trying to get your phone hot.
djsubterrain said:
Thanks for the answer although you didn't actually answer my query, I was wondering if someone could check their custom rom and tell me if the same file is there, with the same values as Google had set, just so I can confirm if custom rom designers use the same values.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most custom kernels are modfied stock kernels, better check the kernel threads but i guess they follow the stock kernel directory`s. As said undervolting decreases heat considerably especialy when gaming and performing intensive tasks .
Is it at all possible to overclock my phone I've heard about it but not sure
NutJob_Gaming said:
Is it at all possible to overclock my phone I've heard about it but not sure
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeap, but you to have to flash either a custom rom and kernel, or just a stock based custom kernel.
For example you can flash CM 12.1 and use Renix63's kernel which features CPU overclock, custom governors & I/O schedulers etc. Search the S3 Threads, there's everything to answer any of your questions. If you need help by finding something specific, I can you list you the corresponding threads for unlocking/rooting and a rom&kernel to keep up with the latest progress.
I would not be too excited however, overclock is not really needed on our device, only if you need to run an heavy game
The phone gets pretty hot as it is so I wouldn't do it if I were you.
Excuse me fellas, but I have my phone overclocked without any issues. I'm getting a faster response and I haven't faced any high temp. So, before replying, have it tested, because it seems that you got the answers from the back of your head. He doesn't care if there are problems, you won't prevent him, or better, you dont have the privilege to do so.
Check my signature. @1497Mhz (I had it @1593 for a while), with a great enough battery life, better responsiveness and a cool phone.
Hello everyone !
I tried many ROMs myself to get the one I want but unfortunately I couldn't find it .
Can anyone tell me which is the max performance ROM in terms of gaming ! If it give decent backup of battery while normal use that's awesome !
Thanks guys
IMHO stock rom is the best in in terms of battery backup and should be pretty good for gaming aswell.
@ sanjay sahu said:
Hello everyone !
I tried many ROMs myself to get the one I want but unfortunately I couldn't find it .
Can anyone tell me which is the max performance ROM in terms of gaming ! If it give decent backup of battery while normal use that's awesome !
Thanks guys
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just have a look at these existing threads about your question
https://forum.xda-developers.com/moto-g4-plus/help/best-rom-moto-g4-plus-t3703836
https://forum.xda-developers.com/moto-g4-plus/help/rom-using-t3691454
https://forum.xda-developers.com/moto-g4-plus/how-to/rom-benchmarks-t3575807
https://forum.xda-developers.com/moto-g4-plus/how-to/coming-circle-t3739850
Here you'll find lots of examples
Dude, just stick with stock. It may not be bleeding edge, but it's the most optimized rom for the device. Must be the best for gaming. You can flash elementalx kernel and tweak to boost the CPU performance.
@ sanjay sahu said:
Hello everyone !
I tried many ROMs myself to get the one I want but unfortunately I couldn't find it .
Can anyone tell me which is the max performance ROM in terms of gaming ! If it give decent backup of battery while normal use that's awesome !
Thanks guys
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock are best for performance but you may try this
https://forum.xda-developers.com/moto-g4-plus/development/rom-unofficial-lineageos-15-1-t3775226