Database Users

Overclock HD2!!

How can i overclock or set my cpu speeds??
......new to winmo
Android man, tryin somethin new tho

There is no program that can overclock the QSD Chips! There isn't one even for the old MSM so I'm not optimistic that there ever will be such a prog!

OrionBG said:
There is no program that can overclock the QSD Chips! There isn't one even for the old MSM so I'm not optimistic that there ever will be such a prog!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no way!! thats crazy, i know on androids nexus one its snapdragon can be overclocked and undervolted its crazy. i thought theyd have something similar on the hd2
so wat good tweaks would u suggest for my hd2?

SimPRoBer20 said:
no way!! thats crazy, i know on androids nexus one its snapdragon can be overclocked and undervolted its crazy. i thought theyd have something similar on the hd2
so wat good tweaks would u suggest for my hd2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you please give me a link to this program?

SimPRoBer20 said:
no way!! thats crazy, i know on androids nexus one its snapdragon can be overclocked and undervolted its crazy. i thought theyd have something similar on the hd2
so wat good tweaks would u suggest for my hd2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And here are most of the tweaks I use!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=583638

yea sure, this is the link for setcpu for android phones
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=505419

SimPRoBer20 said:
yea sure, this is the link for setcpu for android phones
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=505419
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only question I have now is WHY didn't someone did such an app for WM?

OrionBG said:
The only question I have now is WHY didn't someone did such an app for WM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would you ever want to reduce your already scarce battery life?

Fedr0 said:
Why would you ever want to reduce your already scarce battery life?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha my battery life is amazing on this, plus i see lags in the programing n a higher cpu frequency would deff fix them. plus if my battery life was bad, i could then scale down my cpu n conserve battery life...

Fedr0 said:
Why would you ever want to reduce your already scarce battery life?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. Proof of Concept?
2. Because Adroid Have it!
I can think of some more

AMEN!!!
seems like winmo ppl arent as enthusiastic about there developing.
Comin from the android forums....where is the love for winmo..or is there any...
new ****s comin out daily for android.
id love to get an android port goin for my leo, itd b a much more beautiful piece of technology

At the same time, there's still no decent multi format video player on android... and that actually matters a lot more than overclocking a few MHz

True, multimedia is more serious, but (i know, i know here goes) the Droid is overclockable to nearly double it's clock speed and still remains kinda stable. If the HD2 could even be overclocked just 300-400mhz it would really be insane. The Nexus is already being pushed, why not push the HD2?

sounds like one quick way to have a very expensive paperweight,
1ghz is more than enough for what is primarily a telephone. perhaps if applications were followed more, updated, improved etc etc and took efficent use of the hardware availible then overclocking wouldn't even enter your mind.
overclocking should stay in home computers (its cheaper to fix ) i see no reason to attempt to get an extra 1mhz out of a phone worth £470 only to see it exhale a small puff of smoke and turn into 50pence worth of scrap...
get involved with the development of the apps you use, make them better, thats the way forward

quasi_mojo said:
sounds like one quick way to have a very expensive paperweight,
1ghz is more than enough for what is primarily a telephone. perhaps if applications were followed more, updated, improved etc etc and took efficent use of the hardware availible then overclocking wouldn't even enter your mind.
overclocking should stay in home computers (its cheaper to fix ) i see no reason to attempt to get an extra 1mhz out of a phone worth £470 only to see it exhale a small puff of smoke and turn into 50pence worth of scrap...
get involved with the development of the apps you use, make them better, thats the way forward
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what's a pence? is that like a penny? jk jk lolol...there are safeguards built into every chip to prevent it from going over the engineering redline. so if you do go too far...and ignore the signs (and there will be plenty) then shame on the operator for being a dumb-a**...to each his own...

lol thats true, im sure some overly keen 'clocker will no doubt prove us wrong... many moons ago i did overclock my i-mate JAM another 50mhz or so in order to gain and extra few fps when watching .wmv movies... the battery life was shocking though!
oh, and a 'pence' is a completely pointless denomination of currency...several thousand years of social evolution and we still use coins???
paper ftw

I honestly still cant wait for an android port for this beauty!!

Don't quote me on this but isn't the HD2 underclocked to 750Mhz?

Qazz~ said:
Don't quote me on this but isn't the HD2 underclocked to 750Mhz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it scales as required. this was much discussed in regards to the 1ghz hack.

If you really want to be the first one to get over 1Ghz of super duper processing power from your HD2, i suggest you use Pocket Hack Master
Remember, neither the developer of this app nor anyone at xda-developers is responsible if you somehow manage to f*** it up, also, the latest version was built in 2008

Benchmarked VillainROM 6.2.0

Hey guys, I just benchmarked my Hero(Telus) ... VillainRom 6.2.0 ... used the app from the market(blue table graph icon), just wondering what everyone else is being benched at??
The only thing that is backgrounded is the Desk Clock that comes with Rosie.
117.164 total graphics score
161.830 total CPU score
118.092 total memory score
37.326 total file system score

This means nothing if you don't post your CPU speed.

havn't touched cpu ... ROM and radio only updates ... not using setCPU, or the other popular overclocker, or any for that matter.

Graphic 119.479836
CPU 185.26137
Memory 139.53342
Filesystem 35.040806

bulltronStudios said:
havn't touched cpu ... ROM and radio only updates ... not using setCPU, or the other popular overclocker, or any for that matter.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, so what is the default CPU settings for that ROM, then?

Well, the thread is for a particular rom, so, everyone should have same default for the rom, check google if your that curious
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App

LOL! Ok.
.

bulltronStudios said:
Hey guys, I just benchmarked my Hero(Telus) ... VillainRom 6.2.0 ... used the app from the market(blue table graph icon), just wondering what everyone else is being benched at??
The only thing that is backgrounded is the Desk Clock that comes with Rosie.
117.164 total graphics score
161.830 total CPU score
118.092 total memory score
37.326 total file system score
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would you be spamming the forum with YET another benchmark thread, while there are quite a few of them already; post in those.

adwinp said:
Why would you be spamming the forum with YET another benchmark thread, while there are quite a few of them already; post in those.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
guess i didn't cruise to page 400 in the forums ... figured mabye alot of ppl were downloading this ROM ... it does seem to be the fan favorite. and perhaps save people looking 399 pages past this one ...

Graphic: 146.38194
CPU: 227.27559
Memory: 153.31569
Filesys: 35.0106
HTC Hero, [email protected](Max)/352MHz(Min)

bulltronStudios said:
guess i didn't cruise to page 400 in the forums ... figured mabye alot of ppl were downloading this ROM ... it does seem to be the fan favorite. and perhaps save people looking 399 pages past this one ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I guess if people are willing to download a new rom, they would like to look into all their options, not only one. For that matter, this thread (found on page 3) is much more helpful:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=656818
What's the point of having 20 people posting their results with the same rom on the same hardware? Are you going for a statistics? And your argument about people having to scroll around is completely pointless, because your thread won't stay on page 1 forever, you know? So people *will* have to scroll again to see it...

DeXa said:
Graphic: 146.38194
CPU: 227.27559
Memory: 153.31569
Filesys: 35.0106
HTC Hero, [email protected](Max)/352MHz(Min)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now, THAT's meaningful!

DeXa said:
Graphic: 146.38194
CPU: 227.27559
Memory: 153.31569
Filesys: 35.0106
HTC Hero, [email protected](Max)/352MHz(Min)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what kind of heat are you putting off at 748??
what are you using for overclock? setCPU?

killer4o said:
Well, I guess if people are willing to download a new rom, they would like to look into all their options, not only one. For that matter, this thread (found on page 3) is much more helpful:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=656818
What's the point of having 20 people posting their results with the same rom on the same hardware? Are you going for a statistics? And your argument about people having to scroll around is completely pointless, because your thread won't stay on page 1 forever, you know? So people *will* have to scroll again to see it...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
all i was saying was, in response to first dude, marinerb ... was I did NOT put aything on my phone, also, that i had STOCK rom ... if people have overclocks, good, post em, i dont, so i didn't list it.... looking for comparison, no need to be nazi's about it ... so, yeah... just let the thread die.

bulltronStudios said:
what kind of heat are you putting off at 748??
what are you using for overclock? setCPU?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't notice more heat than usual. I only notice heat when charging and it's from the battery. Battery life is better than with stock settings. I use SetCPU, no profiles, ondemand governor and ben39_nobfs_noCC_no-whining kernel.

Thread Moved.

DeXa said:
Graphic: 146.38194
CPU: 227.27559
Memory: 153.31569
Filesys: 35.0106
HTC Hero, [email protected](Max)/352MHz(Min)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is yours stable at 748 if you run the setcpu stress tester for a minute or two?
if so then that's cool - I might have to try that speed too. I know mine locks up instantly at 780mHz more or less, but solid as a rock at 730. I have a feeling I tried 748 and it slowed to a crawl in the stress test and became really unresponsive yet not fully locking up... which to me makes that speed much worse than keeping it a little slower with 100% stability.
EDIT: stress testing 748 right now and it's still working ok... so maybe I stress tested a higher speed instead? running at basically 750mHz is freakin amazing for our little heroes if we can keep them running like that for the next couple of years
update: stress tested my phone at 748mHz results: lasted for 112725 ms before I exited the test with no errors! This little hero is so amazing!
EDIT: whoops - just reset itself LoL.... damn, I hope it boots up ok since I got cocky and set it to boot with the 748 top speed.... damn...
But I'll try it again - you've got me curious now

I have not stress tested the device but it runs stable for a couple of days now. No reboots and no lockups. The devices are somehow different some cannot run at 748 others can. Mine is even stable at 768Mhz but I i suffer less battery life with that setting, so I leave it 748 and everything is ok.

Dexa can you link me that kernel? I'm running ben39_nobfs_no-whining kernel clocked at 738mhz stable with stress testing and I'm curious about the noCC part that you're running. Thanks!

Ah never mind I found it; there was an updated version.

HD2 SetCPU limits?

Hey everyone!
I was wondering...
So far, the HD2 in Android is able to run at a maximum of 1190Mhz. Is there a way to remove this limit and allow Android to increase the CPU clock frequency?
It'd be awesome to see what the Quadrant score would be if speeds of 1.3Ghz were used And Android would be blazing fast

Bump....isn't anyone as interested as I am?

No, in order to reach a higher clock speed the Kernal would have to be modified. But even then many other variables will also need to be considered. Vcore will need to be adjusted, and since at 1.2GHz it's already been increased they would have to increase it further in order not to hit a ceiling causing the CPU to become unstable under load.
Modifying code will also mean that other parts of the Kernal or OS might not play well together. Bugs can be created and would need to be fixed.
Sometimes even doing this will reduce performance rather than increasing. There is a reason why they havn't gone above that speed for now or ever.
Have a great day sir.

frankly saying just don't see the point of doing that. personally i wouldn't want my HD2 to smell like burnt chicken
Elemental_Fire said:
Bump....isn't anyone as interested as I am?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Benchmark scores are ultimately pointless, unless all you want to do with your phone is have willy-waving competitions with other HD2 owners.
"My build get's 3 more points in Linpack than you" big fat hairy deal.
It makes no difference, the only thing that matters is whether your build is fast enough, stable enough, and that you are happy with it. Why melt your phone just to say you've got the highest score in a completely arbitrary set of tests?

Reno_79 said:
Benchmark scores are ultimately pointless, unless all you want to do with your phone is have willy-waving competitions with other HD2 owners.
"My build get's 3 more points in Linpack than you" big fat hairy deal.
It makes no difference, the only thing that matters is whether your build is fast enough, stable enough, and that you are happy with it. Why melt your phone just to say you've got the highest score in a completely arbitrary set of tests?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL XD that was pretty funny.

Reno_79 said:
Benchmark scores are ultimately pointless, unless all you want to do with your phone is have willy-waving competitions with other HD2 owners.
"My build get's 3 more points in Linpack than you" big fat hairy deal.
It makes no difference, the only thing that matters is whether your build is fast enough, stable enough, and that you are happy with it. Why melt your phone just to say you've got the highest score in a completely arbitrary set of tests?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*Linpack score of 7*
Time to pop the blue chip

Elemental_Fire said:
Hey everyone!
I was wondering...
So far, the HD2 in Android is able to run at a maximum of 1190Mhz. Is there a way to remove this limit and allow Android to increase the CPU clock frequency?
It'd be awesome to see what the Quadrant score would be if speeds of 1.3Ghz were used And Android would be blazing fast
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Search my kernel thread. I posted benchmarks at 1.3Ghz. There is really little point to it. I am back running at 1Ghz again.
Sent from my HTC HD2

my leo only goes until 998mhz.. does anyone know why?

hastarin said:
Search my kernel thread. I posted benchmarks at 1.3Ghz. There is really little point to it. I am back running at 1Ghz again.
Sent from my HTC HD2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can validate this. I have been using many different kernels and for my money Hastarin's r8 (maximum cpu speed 998mhz) runs the smoothest and most stable, while giving me 6ma in standby (with 3G on).
Overclocked at 1.9ghz I saw some minor speed improvements but not really all that much and the battery drain was horrendous. Clock speed is overrated, there isn't really anything available on Android that requires more than 1ghz anyways. I have been playing IQ and Final Fantasy 8 with my wii remote on my current CM6 ROM with Hastarin's kernel and everything is smooth as butter.
Benchmark scores are useful to compare kernels and cpu governors, and I really only use Quadrant to look for big changes (+/- 200 points or more). I just updated from an Elbartome kernel to Hastarin r8 and saw an immediate 200 point Quadrant boost using an interactive governor at 1ghz and bettery battery drain.
The real differences are in the kernel, not the clock speed and as kernels get more and more efficient, you will see higher benchmarks from the same clock speed.
Remember that first Cotulla ROM we got on our HD2s in the very beginning? That was 1ghz and it ran like crap (actually amazing for a first ever port) compared to what we have now.
gianmich said:
my leo only goes until 998mhz.. does anyone know why?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again, it's the kernel you are using.
Has nothing to do with the phone, WinMo ROM, or Radio or anything.
All the ROMs in the dev section tell you which kernel they use. If they use Hastarin kernel you will not be able to OC it, I think everyone else uses an OC to 1190mhz kernel, so using their ROM or their kernel will give you the higher clock speed.

Why you guyz give this type of answer he didn t ask if you were agree to overclok just if it would be possible to overclock more that 1190 stop stupid answers we dont give a sh** if you think overclocking is useless just dont reply....
To answer: i ve see dev hd2 running 1323mhz but wasn t stable enough. Impossible to released the kernel as the increase of Vcore was causing excessive hotness and autoshutdown
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App

asphaltkiller said:
Why you guyz give this type of answer he didn t ask if you were agree to overclok just if it would be possible to overclock more that 1190 stop stupid answers we dont give a sh** if you think overclocking is useless just dont reply....
To answer: i ve see dev hd2 running 1323mhz but wasn t stable enough. Impossible to released the kernel as the increase of Vcore was causing excessive hotness and autoshutdown
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pull your head in.
The OP asked a question and I answered it. I have run at 1.3 just fine but have chosen not to do so. Not everyone could of course. I have been lucky with my phone.
If you don't like my answer you're free to ignore it but there is no need for posts like yours.
Sent from my HTC HD2

seems to me the ultimate kernel would be the r8 with undervolt under 1000 , and overvolt above 1000 to maintain sability .. i dun care about battery , i carry 2 with me

who on earth are you to tell others how to reply. the last time i checked your name was not in the list of moderators.
asphaltkiller said:
Why you guyz give this type of answer he didn t ask if you were agree to overclok just if it would be possible to overclock more that 1190 stop stupid answers we dont give a sh** if you think overclocking is useless just dont reply....
To answer: i ve see dev hd2 running 1323mhz but wasn t stable enough. Impossible to released the kernel as the increase of Vcore was causing excessive hotness and autoshutdown
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

asphaltkiller said:
Why you guyz give this type of answer he didn t ask if you were agree to overclok just if it would be possible to overclock more that 1190 stop stupid answers we dont give a sh** if you think overclocking is useless just dont reply....
To answer: i ve see dev hd2 running 1323mhz but wasn t stable enough. Impossible to released the kernel as the increase of Vcore was causing excessive hotness and autoshutdown
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you happen to notice that out of every reply to this thread, yours was the least coherent and offered the least amount of useful information?
The one nugget of information you tried to give wasn't even accurate. It IS possible to release a 1.3ghz kernel, but one has not been publicly released because, as hastarin pointed out, it doesn't really improve performance.
hastarin is a kernel developer, he knows more about this stuff than any of us and I am sure the OP could use the information provided by him and all of us who actually use different kernels and either OC or don't.

Thanks everyone. While it is true that all I wanted to know was if it was possible, a little exra knowledge can't hurt anyone Hastarin, I use your kernel, and admit it's amazing! Guess I don't really need 1.3Ghz as long as the device runs smooth, right? Quadrant speeds aren't totally relevant but I like to show off sometimes, like we all do

so hastarin's kernel allow speed up to 998 mhz?

With respect, this guys post isn't the most coherant but he is French so let's not be too judgemental.
He's also got a point. He's not meaning everyone, especially not hastarin, but posts #4, 5, 6 and 7 are pointless, uninformative and even wrong.
I'm not a big one for philosophy but Plato said "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something". People should just stick to posting in threads that they can usefully contribute to.
I hope this post contributes in the way of reminding people that the post counter is not a measure of intelligence, experience or forum standing.
asphaltkiller said:
Why you guyz give this type of answer he didn t ask if you were agree to overclok just if it would be possible to overclock more that 1190 stop stupid answers we dont give a sh** if you think overclocking is useless just dont reply....
To answer: i ve see dev hd2 running 1323mhz but wasn t stable enough. Impossible to released the kernel as the increase of Vcore was causing excessive hotness and autoshutdown
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Lol yeah, he was helping out...which he did Anyways enough of the flaming lol!
Hastarin, could you inbox me? Need to talk

Elemental_Fire said:
Lol yeah, he was helping out...which he did Anyways enough of the flaming lol!
Hastarin, could you inbox me? Need to talk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Feel free to send me a PM but I am about to head out for most of the day so don't expect a prompt reply.
Sent from my HTC HD2

Benchmark Tests on Legend 2.1 vs 2.2

Hi All,
Updated my missus's Legend to 2.2 today and ran a Quadrant Benchmark test on it..
best of 3 was 903 (avg is about 860)..
What are you getting on 2.1... and what sort of scores are you getting on the custom ROM's out there?
Post your scores stating which ROM you're running..

Clean Eclair, 2.1 = 4XX-5XX
Azure, 2.2 = 8XX-9XX
Cyanogenmod RC2, 2.2.1 = 8XX-9XX
Never benchmark a Sense ROM before so I cannot provide such information.

Best of 3 was 365 on unbranded 2.1 update 1
Sent from my HTC Legend using XDA App

Constantly above 1xxx with CM RC1/RC2 and OC787 kernel...but that's normal since it's overclocked
Sent from my Legend using XDA App

My result was 387 on 2.1 update 1 official Rom
Sent from my HTC Legend using XDA App

im_iceman said:
Hi All,
Updated my missus's Legend to 2.2 today and ran a Quadrant Benchmark test on it..
best of 3 was 903 (avg is about 860)..
What are you getting on 2.1... and what sort of scores are you getting on the custom ROM's out there?
Post your scores stating which ROM you're running..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using a normal 2.1 legend, benchmarked three times... 377, 332 and 361. Even more anxious to get froyo now then!

rajasyaitan said:
Azure, 2.2 = 4XX-5XX
Cyanogenmod RC2, 2.2.1 = 8XX-11XX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fixed....
Sense 2.1 was 3XX (4XX with OC)
However, even going from 3XX to 8XX (CM6.1) I did not see any speed improvements in games. OC DID improve the speed

Skardy said:
Fixed....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You cannot get 11XX without OC'ing.

rajasyaitan said:
You cannot get 11XX without OC'ing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right I forgot to specify

First run on rooted Sense Froyo was 915. Second run was 870. Third was 927.

rajasyaitan said:
Clean Eclair, 2.1 = 4XX-5XX
Azure, 2.2 = 8XX-9XX
Cyanogenmod RC2, 2.2.1 = 8XX-9XX
Never benchmark a Sense ROM before so I cannot provide such information.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry Sir, but are you ****ing-kidding-me? With almost stock 2.1 i had ~380. With azure 1.0.x now i have ~460.

I have not programmed anything in android yet, but I know programming java for some years and I think that I can tell you why those spectacular benchmarks doesn't apply in most games.
The improvements have been made in the dalvik virtual machine, which is responsible for executing the java code of the applications.
But if programmes want more performance, they can write part of the program directly in native code, developed in C or C++. This code cannot be optimized (more), thus applicacions using JNI massively don't see any improvement.
I suppose many games should be using JNI because of the advantages in performance, so they're already 'optimized'.
Please, correct me if I'm wrong
--Edu

no0neX said:
I'm sorry Sir, but are you ****ing-kidding-me? With almost stock 2.1 i had ~380. With azure 1.0.x now i have ~460.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry Sir, but are you a ****ing kid? Let me try to be as nice as possible here. Do your homework before you bash other people. Go to the respected ROM's thread, or the OC thread and look around for other peoples results. That is the average result. 4XX on Azure? Seriously? Throw your phone to the wall and maybe that'll boost the Quadrant scores.

I'm with you my friend. Some people are just ignorant.
rajasyaitan said:
I'm sorry Sir, but are you a ****ing kid? Let me try to be as nice as possible here. Do your homework before you bash other people. Go to the respected ROM's thread, or the OC thread and look around for other peoples results. That is the average result. 4XX on Azure? Seriously? Throw your phone to the wall and maybe that'll boost the Quadrant scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my Legend using XDA App

rajasyaitan said:
I'm sorry Sir, but are you a ****ing kid? Let me try to be as nice as possible here. Do your homework before you bash other people. Go to the respected ROM's thread, or the OC thread and look around for other peoples results. That is the average result. 4XX on Azure? Seriously? Throw your phone to the wall and maybe that'll boost the Quadrant scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Raja, the avarage Azure scores are 4XX because JIT is actually disabled in that rom, even though the option present and checked.

Skardy said:
Raja, the avarage Azure scores are 4XX because JIT is actually disabled in that rom, even though the option present and checked.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually it is enabled. I asked Ali about it before. But then again that was few months ago, I might be wrong.

rajasyaitan said:
Actually it is enabled. I asked Ali about it before. But then again that was few months ago, I might be wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry my bad.
Seems like JIT was disabled only until Azure 0.6.
However I can confirm that my Azure 1.0.1 quadrant score was 4XX (which is kind of low...), and as I now have 1095 with CM6.1 I don't think theres a problem with my legend's performance.

Sorry for the newbie question, but.. how do I run a Quadrant Benchmark ?
I know these numbers refer to the performance, and that the 2.2 scores a lot better, but in actual everyday usage - battery life, speed etc. what does this practically mean?

Skardy said:
Sorry my bad.
Seems like JIT was disabled only until Azure 0.6.
However I can confirm that my Azure 1.0.1 quadrant score was 4XX (which is kind of low...), and as I now have 1095 with CM6.1 I don't think theres a problem with my legend's performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No worries mate. Seriously? The last time I used Azure I got around 8XX. That was version 1.0 I think.
versifier said:
Sorry for the newbie question, but.. how do I run a Quadrant Benchmark ?
I know these numbers refer to the performance, and that the 2.2 scores a lot better, but in actual everyday usage - battery life, speed etc. what does this practically mean?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Install Quadrant and run it. Well, technically it is just numbers. But most of the benchmarkers do admit feeling the difference between lower and higher scores. Some say those are placebo effect, but meh. I don't buy that ****.

2.1 Stock
1st test
380
2nd test
381
3rd test
383
/T

RAM tweaks can cause dead phones after few months? ?

I'm on designgears Cognition with " Juwe11's Ram Tweaks " that designgears combined in is ROMS:
The phone is amazing fast snappy and responsive - like never before
the point is : My friend (with sgs 1 ) told me that one of the best RAM tweaks for the SGS1 (dont know which one?) >>> cause dead phones after few months ?
I'm 100% confidence on designgears judgement & "cooking" !
but...any one knows what was it all about ?
THX!
/

yaronAD said:
I'm on designgears Cognition with " Juwe11's Ram Tweaks " that designgears combined in is ROMS:
The phone is amazing fast snappy and responsive - like never before
the point is : My friend (with sgs 1 ) told me that one of the best RAM tweaks for the SGS1 (dont know wich one?) >>> cause dead phones after few months ?
I'm 100% confidence on designgears judgement & "cooking" !
but...any one knows what was it all about ?
THX!
/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ANY ONE ???

I've heard of n1s wearing out their nand memory from too much flashing but that wasn't months and it was usually test devices that do nothing but flash hundreds of kernels/roms a day. So... no
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

Hahahahahahahaha.

ChongoDroid said:
I've heard of n1s wearing out their nand memory from too much flashing but that wasn't months and it was usually test devices that do nothing but flash hundreds of kernels/roms a day. So... no
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I heard about it too
THX M8!
Hahahahahahahaha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Was hoping for that kind of response
to clear out my Worries
this tweak is amazing!

As with any RAM overclocking you will see an increased temperature which puts more strain on the components. This can obviously cause them to fail in the long run. And taking into account that the our S2s aren't exactly no water cooler to begin with I'd say it is plausible.

Looking at dirty pictures and you will go blind .
Eventually .
jje

JJEgan said:
Looking at dirty pictures and you will go blind .
Eventually .
jje
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hahahahahahahahaha......THX M8 I can see the light

First of all it was never ram tweak that caused sgs to die but rather ext2 tweak on bell sgs and froyo update that increased write speeds that killed external memory (burned the io?) in droves till Samsung/bell made a patch for it in the form of modified secondary bootloader.
Sent from my GT-I9100

Idan73 said:
First of all it was never ram tweak that caused sgs to die but rather ext2 tweak on bell sgs and froyo update that increased write speeds that killed external memory (burned the io?) in droves till Samsung/bell made a patch for it in the form of modified secondary bootloader.
Sent from my GT-I9100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok now that makes sense... I've toasted SD cards doing similar tweaks so I imagine you could fry the internal mem as well.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

Don't know what RAM tweaks do but tweaking voltage practically resulted a dead phone. Nonsense.