Related
The camera sensor 'Sony IMX179' used in the Moto G 2014 is the same as in LG Nexus 5.
As Nexus 5 has Snapdragon 800 and IMX179 sensor enclosed in a special rig it has Optical Image Stabilization. (OIS).
IMX179 is capable of shooting 1080p videos at 30fps & Snapdragon 400 (MSM8226) used in Moto G 2014 is fully capable of processing FHD 1080p video and has FHD encoder support.
Specifications
Type : Active Pixel CMOS
Pixel Size : 1.4 µm
Type : 1/3.2”
Effective Pixels : 8.08MP
Max FPS : 30
Aperture : f/2.0
Focal Length : 27mm
Also Google introduced 1 new API Lollipop onwards for Camera called Camera 2.0 API (android.hardware.camera2) that enables the device fully utilize the hardware and software & a complete manual control on the post-processing features of the image. Nexus 6 and Nexus 5 have Camera 2.0 API implemented in their stock ROMs.
The features that can be controlled using Camera 2.0 API to give far more superior quality images as compared to auto-mode.
Exposure time
ISO Sensitivity
Frame duration
Lens focus distance
Flash trigger
Color correction matrix
JPEG metadata
Tonemap curve
Crop region
AE / AF / AWB mode
AE / AWB lock
AF trigger
Precapture AE trigger
Metering regions
Exposure compensation
Target FPS range
Capture intent
Video stabilization
Motorola too was lazy to upgrade the phone software to enable FHD video recording and introduce Camera 2.0 API. It seems Camera 2.0 needs hardware support as well, will have to confirm it from reliable sources.
I have mailed Motorola of this issue, but still its has been 1 week 3 weeks, still no reply from them.
Hope this information is useful.
sharkymyn said:
The camera sensor used in the Moto G 2014 is the same as in LG Nexus 5. It's the Sony IMX179 1/3.2” CMOS with 1.4 µm pixels. 8 MP f/2.0, 27mm-effective lens. As the Nexus 5 has Snapdragon 800 so it is able to support OIS feature.
Snapdragon 400 used in Moto G has FHD 1080p encoder supported, but Motorola was lazy to upgrade the phone software to enable full HD video recording.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you, this is interesting to know. Can you please confirm how did you come by this information, did you take apart your Moto G 2014, do you know if all variants of Moto G 2014 use the same camera? Can we update phone software - e.g. by using custom Sony Binaries/drivers in the custom built CM12?
anterus said:
Thank you, this is interesting to know. Can you please confirm how did you come by this information, did you take apart your Moto G 2014, do you know if all variants of Moto G 2014 use the same camera? Can we update phone software - e.g. by using custom Sony Binaries/drivers in the custom built CM12?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source : http://www.techspot.com/review/888-motorola-moto-g-2014/page1.html :fingers-crossed:
IMO, All the variants of Moto G 2014 use the same IMX179. And you cannot update the phone software by using Sony's Binaries, they are device specific.
Meanwhile I have mailed Motorola about the same, I am now waiting for their reply
So i wonder what motorola is going to say about this
Just because the sensor is the same doesn't mean the camera module is. In fact, the G has different lenses than the N5 (different aperture sizes, too).
Also, I doubt Motorola was "too lazy" to enable 1080p recording. It's far more likely that this was a deliberate decision to prevent the G from cannibalizing their sales of higher-end models too much.
Interesting so does that mean that a dev could implement 1080p recording?
code65536 said:
Just because the sensor is the same doesn't mean the camera module is. In fact, the G has different lenses than the N5 (different aperture sizes, too).
Also, I doubt Motorola was "too lazy" to enable 1080p recording. It's far more likely that this was a deliberate decision to prevent the G from cannibalizing their sales of higher-end models too much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's just apperture and lens. That doesn't change the fact they share the same camera module. IMX is the same for all phones.
guillaumedsde said:
Interesting so does that mean that a dev could implement 1080p recording?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Technically yes.
guillaumedsde said:
Interesting so does that mean that a dev could implement 1080p recording?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
aditya.upadhyaya said:
Technically yes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even Camera API v2.
I use the attached file to change the profiles of video resolution support.
Use the one from N5, it enable the option 1080p recording, but if i try to record a video it does not, it start and end in one second. when I check the 1 second recorded video is only 720p :silly:, I tested Moto camera, and google camera same result.
The name of the file is only ''media_profiles.xml'' i rename to know... to flash i flash with original name ''media_profiles.xml'' and put it on system/etc...
Of course that would not be so easy.
But is a start... enjoying the thread :good:
baybutcher27 said:
I use the attached file to change the profiles of video resolution support.
Use the one from N5, it enable the option 1080p recording, but if i try to record a video it does not, it start and end in one second. when I check the 1 second recorded video is only 720p :silly:, I tested Moto camera, and google camera same result.
The name of the file is only ''media_profiles.xml'' i rename to know... to flash i flash with original name ''media_profiles.xml'' and put it on system/etc...
Of course that would not be so easy.
But is a start... enjoying the thread :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The drivers doesn't know what "1080p" means so it sticks with 720p.
sky0165 said:
The drivers doesn't know what "1080p" means so it sticks with 720p.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That gave me a brilliant plan. This is the right way of thinking. If possible, can someone use camera.msm8226.so (system/lib/hw/) from a 1080p enabled MSM 8226 chipset and try the same? A couple of Chinese phones and a Sony Xperia phone (don't know in which) has this.
Warning - this could screw the phone up. Backup and reflashing ROM will be necessary.
---------- Post added at 04:41 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:53 AM ----------
baybutcher27 said:
I use the attached file to change the profiles of video resolution support.
Use the one from N5, it enable the option 1080p recording, but if i try to record a video it does not, it start and end in one second. when I check the 1 second recorded video is only 720p :silly:, I tested Moto camera, and google camera same result.
The name of the file is only ''media_profiles.xml'' i rename to know... to flash i flash with original name ''media_profiles.xml'' and put it on system/etc...
Of course that would not be so easy.
But is a start... enjoying the thread :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
media_profiles.xml is a file that lets the OS know what types of encoders and decoders are present, & also usable for the device. By using one from Nexus 5, its letting the our OS know that 1080p HD is available, but when you open the camera, it doesn't have the library driver files to do so., & thus my post above. By getting driver file, it should technically have the capability to record, but if its also kernel related, the kernel also needs to be patched in accordance. But in the mean time, let's take this step by step.
Also, i dont think Motorola's gonna answer.
aditya.upadhyaya said:
That gave me a brilliant plan. This is the right way of thinking. If possible, can someone use camera.msm8226.so (system/lib/hw/) from a 1080p enabled MSM 8226 chipset and try the same? A couple of Chinese phones and a Sony Xperia phone (don't know in which) has this.
Warning - this could screw the phone up. Backup and reflashing ROM will be necessary.
---------- Post added at 04:41 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:53 AM ----------
media_profiles.xml is a file that lets the OS know what types of encoders and decoders are present, & also usable for the device. By using one from Nexus 5, its letting the our OS know that 1080p HD is available, but when you open the camera, it doesn't have the library driver files to do so., & thus my post above. By getting driver file, it should technically have the capability to record, but if its also kernel related, the kernel also needs to be patched in accordance. But in the mean time, let's take this step by step.
Also, i dont think Motorola's gonna answer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe this task is a little more deeper than just replacing files. I think we would need a proper kernel, since it's the bridge between hardware and software to make the current system "speak" with the new files. Because if system request something that was declared differently or wasn't declared with the replaced drivers/libs camera would stop working.
I think lib/hw is the real module blobs, vendor/hw it's the Camera HAL.
sky0165 said:
I believe this task is a little more deeper than just replacing files. I think we would need a proper kernel, since it's the bridge between hardware and software to make the current system "speak" with the new files. Because if system request something that was declared differently or wasn't declared with the replaced drivers/libs camera would stop working.
I think lib/hw is the real module blobs, vendor/hw it's the Camera HAL.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, that's a decent explanation.
With that, we require Camera HAL of a Lollipop based MSM8226 chipset, preferably by Motorola. But, Moto G & G2 are d only known Lollipop Snapdragon 400 phones.
Can someone send me the .so file for lib/hw/ ? And if possible send me d HAL file of any MSM8226 phone? I want to test it anyways. No harm in doing that, right?
aditya.upadhyaya said:
Okay, that's a decent explanation.
With that, we require Camera HAL of a Lollipop based MSM8226 chipset, preferably by Motorola. But, Moto G & G2 are d only known Lollipop Snapdragon 400 phones.
Can someone send me the .so file for lib/hw/ ? And if possible send me d HAL file of any MSM8226 phone? I want to test it anyways. No harm in doing that, right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think it's like that.
I think first we need N5 camera blobs and probably some reverse-engineering to make the files "fit" on G. These blobs are what makes the module turn on, focus, etc. Here, we're speaking on Hardware level.
The last thing is Software level, which is HAL. APP requests to HAL that requests to CAMERA.
Don't know if this is right.
sky0165 said:
I don't think it's like that.
I think first we need N5 camera blobs and probably some reverse-engineering to make the files "fit" on G. These blobs are what makes the module turn on, focus, etc. Here, we're speaking on Hardware level.
The last thing is Software level, which is HAL. APP requests to HAL that requests to CAMERA.
Don't know if this is right.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm... Yeah. That's also there.
Okay guys so here is the update
I mailed the Motorola regarding this issue on 13th March, 2015, They assured that the mail will be replied within 24 hours.
Today is 17th March, 2014. Its been 3 days, still no reply from their side.
May be a bad news for some!!
I read a news article from GSMArena where it stated that even Samsung didn't implement all features of Camera API 2.0 in their Samsung S6 and S6 Edge. Considering it is a recent flagship and has more than enough oomph and still not given the benefits of Lollipop API's i seriously doubt Moto will do anything for Moto G. Moto X 2014 might have a chance and Moto X 2015 will have it more or less. Unless Moto releases resources for implementing Camera API or someone comes with a open driver solution or some dev creates a hack to enable the settings by Xposed i seriously doubt this will ever happen. My post may feel negative but its the reality as far as i think. Anyway lets hope:crying:
---------- Post added at 12:57 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:28 AM ----------
Tried contacting Motorola Support through the help app. Seems they don't have any information about this. So i have created a petition on https://www.change.org/p/motorola-k...r-moto-g-x-both-generations?just_created=true If anyone is interested kindly take part all we can do is ask Motorola for it.
To be honest, if we can do it, not a big problem insert it into CM and done =)
By the way, is there a way to modify drivers and make the software take movies at 60FPS (Since the Slow Mode is at 60FPS, but divided by 4 that gets 15FPS)
raju sesharaj said:
I read a news article from GSMArena where it stated that even Samsung didn't implement all features of Camera API 2.0 in their Samsung S6 and S6 Edge. Considering it is a recent flagship and has more than enough oomph and still not given the benefits of Lollipop API's i seriously doubt Moto will do anything for Moto G. Moto X 2014 might have a chance and Moto X 2015 will have it more or less. Unless Moto releases resources for implementing Camera API or someone comes with a open driver solution or some dev creates a hack to enable the settings by Xposed i seriously doubt this will ever happen. My post may feel negative but its the reality as far as i think. Anyway lets hope:crying:
---------- Post added at 12:57 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:28 AM ----------
Tried contacting Motorola Support through the help app. Seems they don't have any information about this. So i have created a petition on https://www.change.org/p/motorola-k...r-moto-g-x-both-generations?just_created=true If anyone is interested kindly take part all we can do is ask Motorola for it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, S6 is still to be launched. I believe the software they're running isn't 100% finished and polished, just like M9. Wait April 10, probably they'll add it on day 1 or some weeks later.
As topic name says, sony wants to know if there is demand to support "RAW" format for Xperia Line in future lollipop release.
You can read more here
http://www.xperiablog.net/2015/04/2...capture-in-future-if-there-is-popular-demand/
And you can request it on official sony forum
http://talk.sonymobile.com/t5/Software-Updates/Camera2-API/m-p/974754#M21577
What is RAW exactly ?
I read it a couple pf times but i am not sure what it is.
Roughly speaking it's an image file. RAW is commonly used by photographers and they have more detail than your average jpeg. But RAW files user alot of memory.
I don't care for it tbh. Jpeg files on my Z2 are big enough when I go full 20 Mpixel.
Honestly I don't care about RAW either. But I want them to implement camera2 api.
I hope we can choose between jpeg or raw if it becomes available not just one
RJASSI21 said:
I hope we can choose between jpeg or raw if it becomes available not just one
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's no way in hell they'd set RAW as default. RAW is practically unusable without editing, and takes a lot of space. If they implement it it's definitely gonna be optional.
Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk
The thing is, if they add support for RAW photo's, there's a good chance the camera mode will get updated from legacy mode to either limited or full mode. To find out what that would mean, head over to this link. (it also gives an overview of which devices support which camera2 mode) And here is a quote for the lazy ones:
Camera2 Supported Hardware Levels
FULL: all that’s required but not everything
30fps operation at sensor resolution preferred, 20fps required for at least uncompressed YUV output: useful for burst capture and computational photography
Per frame control
Manual sensor control: Like exposure time, ISO gain
Manual post-processing control: color rendition, contrast/gamma curve, noise reduction
Arbitrary cropping, in size and coordinates
At least 3 processed non-stalling output streams formats: like YUV 4:2:0 used for preview.
The ability to list and auto-configure output formats according to a list of supported streams
Note that FULL does not require RAW capture nor valid metadata and calibration profile for the DNG writer.
LIMITED: partial support, your mileage may vary
Cameras describing themselves as limited have some of the Camera2 capabilities but not all of them, and not all the ones required for the FULL supported hardware level either.
The reason would be either because the camera module or its Image Signal Processor lacks some of the required capabilities, or because the manufacturer didn’t implement them so they become available in Camera2 API.
LEGACY: a wrapper around the old Camera API
Legacy Camera2 means only really the historic Camera API is implemented. But for good measure, Lollipop adds a layer over it so modern camera applications do not have to implement two separate ways to control the imaging systems.
Each camera (usually back and front) has its own capability set. For instance, Nexus 5 hardware support level is FULL for the back and LIMITED for the front.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right now we're on legacy, which means we don't get any of the fancy new camera2 api features. If Sony updates it, it should be relatively easy to add more features, like manual focus for example. (which I would love to have, personally)
It comes down to this:
Even if you don't care about RAW photography, it's still wise to request it and maybe request support for full mode because that will get you a lot of other cool features as well.
I DO NOT need it.
It's a plus point, but definitely not a necessity.
Raw it's a optional feature, but the other features of camera2api are usefull. We can use finally the sony's sensors at max power I want camera2api and RAW
I think it's rude they are even asking for our opinion. Google published it and Sony excluded it from the original code and now is asking us if we want it.
Personally, it's not as important as - say- a SMS software or not a must but still, why take something out?
Sent from my D6503 using XDA Free mobile app
_delice_doluca_ said:
I think it's rude they are even asking for our opinion. Google published it and Sony excluded it from the original code and now is asking us if we want it.
Personally, it's not as important as - say- a SMS software or not a must but still, why take something out?
Sent from my D6503 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At least they lending a listening ear. Most OEMs, including Samsung, excluded it. Industry standard.
Well at least Sony think about the people and asking it, we cant say that from other manufractures
Id love to see raw support
Seeing a camera with raw vs without is a big difference
I want
LAKAME_MAN said:
There's no way in hell they'd set RAW as default. RAW is practically unusable without editing, and takes a lot of space. If they implement it it's definitely gonna be optional.
Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank god for that!
not a need, but definitly a want
Absolutely a need. I will not buy another device which doesn't support raw capture, now that it is readily available for manufacturers to add.
I would definitely wanna see RAW support since it significantly improves the quality of pictures on Android phones with Lollipop..
Defently CameraApi2 would be useful, now I can take really good pictures with manual but with that extra features.
Sony camera will rock!
Guys, even if you would not use it, just request it as many others would use. Please help the community.
http://www.sonymobile.com/global-en/xperia/technologies/camera/
Shutter speed control
Use maximum shutter speed (1/4000) for sharp images of moving subjects. Or try a slower speed (1 sec.) for a motion blur effect.
Manual focus
Decide your precise focal point. Bring the furthest away object into focus and defocus the foreground, or vice versa.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9w_5SJtLLYs (video review of the camera in Xperia XZ by Btekt)
Still, the least min shutter speed from all manufacturers - HTC 2 sec, Samsung 10 sec, LG and OnePlus 30 sec. but the fact that Sony finally implemented that API is great!
Hopefully not only the XZ will get this and we will see updated cameras in older models.
sony fanboy here but still...1 sec? and samsung has 10 seconds shutter time? Is this what sony calls "innovation"?????
I wonder if they will update it with a longer time. I would like that.
I wouldn't call it "full" since it still doesn't have raw capture.
furkandeger said:
I wouldn't call it "full" since it still doesn't have raw capture.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With This 100% I agree. Is this really full manual control? I mean Sony is a master in RAW imagining. Their alpha series got the best RAW as far as I believe.
actually i agree with the decision to not add raw. For now it looks like a useless feature on a smartphone to me. just a memory eater. Not even all the compact cameras has it and most of them make better photos than a smartphone. Raw files are mostly for professionals and they use professional cameras. And finally shutter speed control! that was the only feature i felt was missing on xperia phones
I would like t see RAW. I shoot it exclusively on all my cameras, so I would use it on my phone. You can use it or not, so there should be no concerns about space. Space is so cheap these days anyway.
The problem IMO is not RAW, it is that Sony is really lazy about adding the features from their new devices on the older ones(that support them). Remember 4K and timeshift video? Z1 didn't get them from the Z2 although they were fully supported by the hw. I think Sony will do the same with limited/full camera2 api support....
(would be very glad to see Sony disproving me)
I understand it's a marketing trick to force users to buy the new model, but supported users are happy users, and happy users will have their next device Sony again, which IMO is far better strategy
Finally,
Can anyone confirm whether ISO can be changed at 23MP and if Steadyshot works with still photos? Recombu seems to show it working in Superior Auto mode but the video isn't very clear with it.
I think the Z5 had it on its original software but after the camera app was updated in November it no longer had it, even though Sony claimed on their forum that Steadyshot is on by default.
FYL21 said:
Can anyone confirm whether ISO can be changed at 23MP and if Steadyshot works with still photos? Recombu seems to show it working in Superior Auto mode but the video isn't very clear with it.
I think the Z5 had it on its original software but after the camera app was updated in November it no longer had it, even though Sony claimed on their forum that Steadyshot is on by default.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately ISO cannot be changed at 23MPx.
Moreover, even for lower resolution, it is not possible to adjust few options at the same time, like when you change the shutter speed, ISO and HDR etc are unavailable... They really need to fix this issueto allow us better manual control, and not only 1 option at the time + support higher resolutions and 4K videos.
4K is really biased, non of ne implemented technologies like 5 axis stabilization are supported in 4K.
I think Sony just added its old 4K app without updating it to combine with new features, sadly
decomposed said:
Unfortunately ISO cannot be changed at 23MPx.
Moreover, even for lower resolution, it is not possible to adjust few options at the same time, like when you change the shutter speed, ISO and HDR etc are unavailable... They really need to fix this issueto allow us better manual control, and not only 1 option at the time + support higher resolutions and 4K videos.
4K is really biased, non of ne implemented technologies like 5 axis stabilization are supported in 4K.
I think Sony just added its old 4K app without updating it to combine with new features, sadly
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not implementing camera RAW in 2017 is close to a deal breaker, sony. Implement the full camera 2.0 API with raw support asap...
peppepop said:
Not implementing camera RAW in 2017 is close to a deal breaker, sony. Implement the full camera 2.0 API with raw support asap...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, it may be a complete deal breaker for me.
---------- Post added at 12:55 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:54 AM ----------
peppepop said:
Not implementing camera RAW in 2017 is close to a deal breaker, sony. Implement the full camera 2.0 API with raw support asap...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anyone know if the new camera (in the XZs and XZ premium ) supports raw ?
Fred98TJ said:
Yeah, it may be a complete deal breaker for me.
---------- Post added at 12:55 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:54 AM ----------
Anyone know if the new camera (in the XZs and XZ premium ) supports raw ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I sure hope so, it is supposed to have more camera properties than ever before, even went down to 19mpix from 23 to have more light sensitivity for the camera. Furthermore, if anyone thinks RAW (which is already there in the Android source code) isn't necessary - well just don't use it then.
It's like saying "I don't need a car that goes above 75 mph, so it's unnecessary to implement"
Hi! I'm interested in the Camera2 API support level of the Mi A1 as I like to use manual controls in pro video recording apps like FilmicPro. Can anyone download this free app "Camera2 probe" and post a screenshot of the results after running it? I'm mostly interested in the top part where it says "Hardware Level Support Category" - hoping for "Full" or "Level 3" support.
Cheers!
Celludroid said:
Hi! I'm interested in the Camera2 API support level of the Mi A1 as I like to use manual controls in pro video recording apps like FilmicPro. Can anyone download this free app "Camera2 probe" and post a screenshot of the results after running it? I'm mostly interested in the top part where it says "Hardware Level Support Category" - hoping for "Full" or "Level 3" support.
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://dl.xda-developers.com/4/4/8....png?key=5AAp_Oamk40cNdhst9ayJA&ts=1525058917
You can get Level 3 Support if you follow the non rooting gcam installation tutorial that's out there in this forum.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/mi-a1/how-to/tool-google-camera-root-magisk-enable-t3747585
here you can enable camera2api without loosing ota update , i did this months ago and havent had any problem at all , good luck :good:
Cristewor said:
https://dl.xda-developers.com/4/4/8....png?key=5AAp_Oamk40cNdhst9ayJA&ts=1525058917
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks everyone for the feedback! It's rather disappointing that Xiaomi doesn't activate full Camera2 functionality from the get-go.
What settings do you guys use in the Google Camera app? And which Google Camera app do you use?
I don't use Gcam.
I use the stock camera app which is actually quite good and has manual controls if needed.
It doesn't have a level indicator unfortunately.
I also use Snap Camera as I have set presets on User 1, 2 and 3 for specific uses at work. It's good for video too.
Can't see a real need to use Gcam except on a custom ROM so I assume that's what you're doing? Try Snap Camera.
RobboW said:
I don't use Gcam.
I use the stock camera app which is actually quite good and has manual controls if needed.
It doesn't have a level indicator unfortunately.
I also use Snap Camera as I have set presets on User 1, 2 and 3 for specific uses at work. It's good for video too.
Can't see a real need to use Gcam except on a custom ROM so I assume that's what you're doing? Try Snap Camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I'm in AEX
RobboW said:
I don't use Gcam.
I use the stock camera app which is actually quite good and has manual controls if needed.
It doesn't have a level indicator unfortunately.
I also use Snap Camera as I have set presets on User 1, 2 and 3 for specific uses at work. It's good for video too.
Can't see a real need to use Gcam except on a custom ROM so I assume that's what you're doing? Try Snap Camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HDR+ is a real need. You have no idea how much it improves on low light conditions. Literally night and day.
Plus you get Portrait mode and stuffs
---------- Post added at 03:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:27 AM ----------
senny22 said:
What settings do you guys use in the Google Camera app? And which Google Camera app do you use?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use HDR+ on Super High and basically nothing much else. It works out of the box on B12 and AEX/RR, and you can flash a zip to make it work on B01
Choose an username... said:
I use HDR+ on Super High and basically nothing much else. It works out of the box on B12 and AEX/RR, and you can flash a zip to make it work on B01
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, mind me asking which gcam apk you are using.