Device's performance? - P8lite Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

I saw on HTCMania forum of P8 Lite, at the device info thing, where Antutu score was 35.000 something, but on XDA max performance brought by XePeleato on Esal V2.2 was 32.000 something points. Is there really a even better performance tweak or that is just "fake"?
Thanks:good:
EDIT: I let a screenshot too, just to see

It's not fake, you can achieve even higher with a newer esal... On B596 stock kernel and some tweaks i got 34.xxx, so that 35 can be real...

D1stRU3T0R said:
It's not fake, you can achieve even higher with a newer esal... On B596 stock kernel and some tweaks i got 34.xxx, so that 35 can be real...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol. thanks

D1stRU3T0R said:
It's not fake, you can achieve even higher with a newer esal... On B596 stock kernel and some tweaks i got 34.xxx, so that 35 can be real...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With L Speed you can boost scores too, but battery life would be much shorter

Related

How to improve my beast

Hi friends.
I compared with antutu result for my note 3.pls recommend me how to improve & to fetch maximum than note 3 offered.
mamoo said:
Hi friends.
I compared with antutu result for my note 3.pls recommend me how to improve & to fetch maximum than note 3 offered.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That score is fine, they vary quite a lot. you could run it 2000 times and get anything from 28k to around 35k or so. There's no real way to get a higher score.
radicalisto said:
That score is fine, they vary quite a lot. you could run it 2000 times and get anything from 28k to around 35k or so. There's no real way to get a higher score.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can put a custom kernel on and over clock if you are rooted
jaythenut said:
You can put a custom kernel on and over clock if you are rooted
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, but then you're technically fixing your score haha -- in generic terms though isn't much you can change.
Overclocked
Get it overclocked...simple
Sry to mention. I am in Stock rom (N900 Exynos). Rooted
Pls suggest kernel and clocking rate

Overclocking snapdragon 800.

So I was wondering about the truth behind the risks of frying your cpu through overclocking or the chip itself degrading faster over time, and if there are such risks do they apply to a simple 2.5 ghz overclocking ?
There isn't any risk like that, unless you are using extremely high voltage, or are at terribly hot place.
I have tested all the overclockable kernels, and haven't found a single one which is steady at 2.6 or 2.8 GHz. Only Faux's kernel at 2490 MHz is stable.
Don't be scared, there's no risk.
PS: I personally use Performance governor by the way, so the CPU is always at max frequency, against all advice I keep using that for past three years, never had a problem, and you can understand where I live the temperature reaches extremely high in summer, so...
devilsdouble said:
There isn't any risk like that, unless you are using extremely high voltage, or are at terribly hot place.
I have tested all the overclockable kernels, and haven't found a single one which is steady at 2.6 or 2.8 GHz. Only Faux's kernel at 2490 MHz is stable.
Don't be scared, there's no risk.
PS: I personally use Performance governor by the way, so the CPU is always at max frequency, against all advice I keep using that for past three years, never had a problem, and you can understand where I live the temperature reaches extremely high in summer, so...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's actually comforting I too am using fauxclock and I live in Egypt so the temperature gets pretty high here, but I'm constantly monitoring the cpu's temperature so I will give the 2.5 ghz overclock a try for a while and see how it goes.
MohamedOMostafa said:
That's actually comforting I too am using fauxclock and I live in Egypt so the temperature gets pretty high here, but I'm constantly monitoring the cpu's temperature so I will give the 2.5 ghz overclock a try for a while and see how it goes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah do that. Just to see if the OC is stable run that damn Antutu benchmark. If the device doesn't reboot/stuck then OC is stable
Best of luck.
devilsdouble said:
Yeah do that. Just to see if the OC is stable run that damn Antutu benchmark. If the device doesn't reboot/stuck then OC is stable
Best of luck.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the first thing I did actually
MohamedOMostafa said:
That's the first thing I did actually
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha ha. Good. That's on Faux right? I got almost same score (44.7k) when I was checking.
Now if you want more then flash one of those 2.6 or 2.8 GHz kernels, and do the test, and message me if Antutu finishes the benchmark even once
devilsdouble said:
Ha ha. Good. That's on Faux right? I got almost same score (44.7k) when I was checking.
Now if you want more then flash one of those 2.6 or 2.8 GHz kernels, and do the test, and message me if Antutu finishes the benchmark even once
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
will do.
If you want higher you should try out Ultimate Kernel. Although it is removed from XDA, you can still find it on some foreign language site. It's the highest and most stable OC kernel I have used (3.0GHz).
Graffiti Exploit said:
If you want higher you should try out Ultimate Kernel. Although it is removed from XDA, you can still find it on some foreign language site. It's the highest and most stable OC kernel I have used (3.0GHz).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3.0 GHz
any benchmark screenshots ??
Graffiti Exploit said:
If you want higher you should try out Ultimate Kernel. Although it is removed from XDA, you can still find it on some foreign language site. It's the highest and most stable OC kernel I have used (3.0GHz).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, just found the topic, and it's mentioned that the topic was close due to non-compliance with the GNU GPLv2 and XDA forum rules, now what's the former thing?
Anyone has the latest version, if it's still updated outside XDA? Want to try it.
djak272 said:
3.0 GHz
any benchmark screenshots ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry cleaned up my screenshots folder as it was taking up a lot of space. Besides Antutu has been constantly getting updates so it may not be accurate.
devilsdouble said:
Hmm, just found the topic, and it's mentioned that the topic was close due to non-compliance with the GNU GPLv2 and XDA forum rules, now what's the former thing?
Anyone has the latest version, if it's still updated outside XDA? Want to try it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know if this is allowed but here it is.
v72
http://www.android-hilfe.de/custom-...ernel-kitkat-tw-only-ultimate-kernel-v72.html
v73
https://www.androidsource.club/foru...kernel-ultimate-kernel-v73-galaxy-note-3.html
Last one I used was v63. So do test it out more because I cannot vouch for the updates. But based from experience, I have never gotten an unstable update from that kernel.
Graffiti Exploit said:
Sorry cleaned up my screenshots folder as it was taking up a lot of space. Besides Antutu has been constantly getting updates so it may not be accurate.
I don't know if this is allowed but here it is.
v72
http://www.android-hilfe.de/custom-...ernel-kitkat-tw-only-ultimate-kernel-v72.html
v73
https://www.androidsource.club/foru...kernel-ultimate-kernel-v73-galaxy-note-3.html
Last one I used was v63. So do test it out more because I cannot vouch for the updates. But based from experience, I have never gotten an unstable update from that kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot for the link mate. Downloaded and flashed v73, but I can't get it past the stock clock rate of 2265 MHz! I mean I have tried to set higher frequency than that in S Tweaks, even downloaded Trickstar, SetCPU, but the it'd just stuck at 2265 MHz! I can go lower than 2265 but not higher! Weird!
devilsdouble said:
Thanks a lot for the link mate. Downloaded and flashed v73, but I can't get it past the stock clock rate of 2265 MHz! I mean I have tried to set higher frequency than that in S Tweaks, even downloaded Trickstar, SetCPU, but the it'd just stuck at 2265 MHz! I can go lower than 2265 but not higher! Weird!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it comes with 2 apps for customization. You apply frequency on the first one and open the other and select apply changes. I'm not sure if it was this kernel or was it AEL. Lol. Anyways good luck. Maybe your ROM doesn't support a certain "stuff". I'm sorry but I really forgot about those terminologies. You can read up on the closed thread if you want. I'm sure you'll have a clue or on that link I gave you. *Google Translate ftw*

Benchmark Thread! [Post Your Benchmarks]

This is obviously not a gaming device or a high end device but still performance might be different in different ROMs or kernels so
Mine is 19198 (Not impressive)
Current ROM : CM 12.1 Snapshot Latest Builds
KERNEL: CM
StarTrek1 said:
This is obviously not a gaming device or a high end device but still performance might be different in different ROMs or kernels so
Mine is 19198 (Not impressive)
Current ROM : CM 12.1 Snapshot Latest Builds
KERNEL: CM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which app did you use to benchmark?
Ragarianok said:
Which app did you use to benchmark?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Antutu Bench 5.7.1
StarTrek1 said:
Antutu Bench 5.7.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm getting 18404 on CM12.1 10/8 nightly. Honestly, I think a benchmark is pointless on a low-end device.
Ragarianok said:
I'm getting 18404 on CM12.1 10/8 nightly. Honestly, I think a benchmark is pointless on a low-end device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not actually pointless but atleast we know what ROM is better in term for that low end device
StarTrek1 said:
Not actually pointless but atleast we know what ROM is better in term for that low end device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I suppose that's true. I wish I had taken a benchmark when I was using Exodus.
Antutu Benchmark: 18022
I'm at Minimal OS without changing the kernel. Personally I thought it would be a little higher, but anyway lets see in a few weeks if Android Marshmallow really improves this score!
Vicioxis said:
Antutu Benchmark: 18022
I'm at Minimal OS without changing the kernel. Personally I thought it would be a little higher, but anyway lets see in a few weeks if Android Marshmallow really improves this score!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Marshmallow won't improve score very much but let's see if RAM performance changes in M
StarTrek1 said:
Marshmallow won't improve score very much but let's see if RAM performance changes in M
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now THAT'S something to hope for.
Ragarianok said:
Now THAT'S something to hope for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup :good:
Of course RAM is the most important for our Moto G because we only have 1GB of RAM and with Lollipop my device is sometimes enraging to use because it hangs for a lot of time and some apps close in the backgroud. Fingers crossed!
Minimal OS 3.0 and decipher kernel v7
Sent from somewhere
Minimal OS and latest decipher kernel.
However, in CM13 with halogen kernel I scored about 21k. I know that benchmark do not depict the real life conditions, but 10k less in MM must mean something also.
Last CM12.1 NIightly with decipher kernel. 25016 on Antutu

Snapdragon 801 ac at par of Snapdragon 808

Without any doubt we could say that the snpadragon 800 and 801 is perhaps the best processor or one of the best manufactured by Qualcomm ... as you see this at the height of the snapdragon 808, do not take much, what do you think? a greeting
Sony xperia z3
60000 points in antutu 6, LG g4 63000 points and Xiaomi mi4s 57000...
I cant post images now
Sorry, i duplicate my user with tapatalk...
Here the images
Not sure how you manage to get 60000 there.
Yes, on KK was <50000, on LL/MM was about 50000, and on NougatPreview4 saw it even 52000, but your number is way out there.
Can you show us a PCMark Work 2.0 result and a 3DMark ES 3.0 result too?
Licaon_Kter said:
Not sure how you manage to get 60000 there.
Yes, on KK was <50000, on LL/MM was about 50000, and on NougatPreview4 saw it even 52000, but your number is way out there.
Can you show us a PCMark Work 2.0 result and a 3DMark ES 3.0 result too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi friend, im in stock marshmallow 6.0.1
kevin233333 said:
Hi friend, im in stock marshmallow 6.0.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes friend, that's great for you, we need more proof though.
I got 64000 on ExistenZ rom and Elite kernel. (without OC)
Don't know if 801 is better than 808 (I don't think it's more powerful, differences may be related to software, screen resolution...) but it has more than enough power and is really trustworthy. I haven't see many problems on this chips on any phone.
i also got 60-62 on marshmallow with my z3 stock android ill be uploading a vid on youtube,
ayocuan said:
i also got 60-62 on marshmallow with my z3 stock android ill be uploading a vid on youtube,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again, that's nice, but, if a higher (than usual) score is seen only in one particular app, it sounds like an error, that's why I was asking for another test in another app (PCMark, GeekBench, Basemark, whatever), that will show a higher score too, hence proving that the device (or Android version) is indeed faster.
Licaon_Kter said:
Again, that's nice, but, if a higher (than usual) score is seen only in one particular app, it sounds like an error, that's why I was asking for another test in another app (PCMark, GeekBench, Basemark, whatever), that will show a higher score too, hence proving that the device (or Android version) is indeed faster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i did geekbench4 and got 987 single/ 2697 multi
I was going to post some numbers, but...
* last week AnTuTu 6.2.7: 52912
* today AnTuTu 6.2.7: 58133
Yes, looks like all those that point out that this app is flawed were right all along, hence my skepticism in the above posts.
That being said, other apps are more consistent:
* GeekBench 4: ~1000/~2600 (yeah there's a slight variation per run but it's <3%!)
* 3DMark: ~1100 (again, slight variations)
Just to confirm,
See attached screenshot.
Z3 running stock 6.0.1
mcraeally44 said:
Just to confirm,
See attached screenshot.
Z3 running stock 6.0.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice, does 3DMark confirm this greater than average performance? Eg. You have 1500 points or something.
Antutu Benchmark z3-ExistenZ 5.6.5
Antutu Benchmark-z3 d6603 with ExistenZ Rom from today
Weky2306 said:
Antutu Benchmark-z3 d6603 with ExistenZ Rom from today
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And a 3DMark for confirmation please. Thanks
Licaon_Kter said:
And a 3DMark for confirmation please. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Weky2306 said:
3DMark: 1215
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, as expected, similar score.
That's the problem with AnTuTu, while your score there is way over Z3 average (your 65000 vs 52000 or 58000 that I and others get), your 3DMark is at the Z3 average. :-\
If you find time try a GeekBench too. Thanks.
Licaon_Kter said:
Yeah, as expected, similar score.
That's the problem with AnTuTu, while your score there is way over Z3 average (your 65000 vs 52000 or 58000 that I and others get), your 3DMark is at the Z3 average. :-\
If you find time try a GeekBench too. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
---------- Post added at 06:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:26 PM ----------
Weky2306 said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It looks like only Antutu is different like you said
Weky2306 said:
It looks like only Antutu is different like you said
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep and when a new product advertises an AnTuTu score first I get the "they try to hide something vibe".
Don't get me wrong, I like big scores, I want users to share their setup that helped them, but usually I see some test somewhere (say, new device), so I go and try to compare it to my own, and "hey, surprise", most of the time benches on my device in hand will have a lower score than the same device from their test, so what does that leave me with?
My device was scoring 49000 on KK, then 52000 on LL, now it's 53000 or 58000 on NDP4, what does that tell me? Nothing much about my device.
Now, going to PCMark (general performance), 3DMark (GPU), GeekBench (CPU) gives you a better image of the device.
This whole thread can now be shorten to: "OMFG huge score in AnTuTu that does not reflect any performance improvement in any other benches, yay"

overclocking, modifying the kernel

I want to learn how I can modify kernel to adjust clock speeds. wt88047 redmi 2 . If anyone can detail the steps it would be great
Thank you
jsidney96 said:
I want to learn how I can modify kernel to adjust clock speeds. wt88047 redmi 2 . If anyone can detail the steps it would be great
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overclock dont work on redmi 2, all overclocks are fake
NaassomDourado said:
Overclock dont work on redmi 2, all overclocks are fake
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, except GPU overclock by me and Ashish94, the true 620mhz and the TurboClock 465T increase ~35% the gaming performance, games like asphalt 8 will run at 8 or 9 fps higher with the Overclock
TecnoTailsPlays said:
Yep, except GPU overclock by me and Ashish94, the true 620mhz and the TurboClock 465T increase ~35% the gaming performance, games like asphalt 8 will run at 8 or 9 fps higher with the Overclock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can select upto 1.8ghz on the zetsubo kernel , thats fake??
It feels smoother once overclocked.........
jsidney96 said:
You can select upto 1.8ghz on the zetsubo kernel , thats fake??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fake
TecnoTailsPlays said:
Fake
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont believe it, atleast tell me the fake steps
Those kernels heats up and locks up if i set too high cpu clk..... I know it can be overclocked..
jsidney96 said:
I want to learn how I can modify kernel to adjust clock speeds. wt88047 redmi 2 . If anyone can detail the steps it would be great
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i'd suggest you to try lateautumn kernel, it boosts your CPU freq to 1.8ghz and it seems like it worked for me, battery drained so fast tho...
rufuskid said:
i'd suggest you to try lateautumn kernel, it boosts your CPU freq to 1.8ghz and it seems like it worked for me, battery drained so fast tho...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I want to learn how to do it....
jsidney96 said:
I dont believe it, atleast tell me the fake steps
Those kernels heats up and locks up if i set too high cpu clk..... I know it can be overclocked..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look, I'm tired from explaining that CPU overcloks are fake, just freaking search about snapdragon 410, the processor is LOCKED, PLL overclock is not possible without external source file help, only Moto g3 osprey have this file, when somebody port's that file to our source, I will be wrong
Also if you don't even know how to overclock a device, how can you say that I'm wrong?
jsidney96 said:
I want to learn how to do it....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
download kernel adiutor and you will have the option there (with the custom kernel applied)
TecnoTailsPlays said:
Look, I'm tired from explaining that CPU overcloks are fake, just freaking search about snapdragon 410, the processor is LOCKED, PLL overclock is not possible without external source file help, only Moto g3 osprey have this file, when somebody port's that file to our source, I will be wrong
Also if you don't even know how to overclock a device, how can you say that I'm wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am sorry . Its just i couldnt believe it .... I will try to do something useful
jsidney96 said:
I am sorry . Its just i couldnt believe it .... I will try to do something useful
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Something useful? Why don't you try arm64 aosp caf by pirej and see how the rom is? we need more people to log some bugs like wifi 10m off, etc
TecnoTailsPlays said:
Something useful? Why don't you try arm64 aosp caf by pirej and see how the rom is? we need more people to log some bugs like wifi 10m off, etc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
saw this.....
https://forum.xda-developers.com/redmi-2/help/compiling-kernel-development-overclock-t3538273
I am having exams now..... i will jumb right back in once exams are over..... i am already running pirej's rom on 2014818....
i am still learning
jsidney96 said:
saw this.....
https://forum.xda-developers.com/redmi-2/help/compiling-kernel-development-overclock-t3538273
I am having exams now..... i will jumb right back in once exams are over..... i am already running pirej's rom on 2014818....
i am still learning
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At that time I din't know anything about this phone, becouse I just had buyed it, then I started spending 8hrs in the computer to study kernels, redmi 2, and all related to source, android, etc. Then I started making overclocks, and after 2 weeks of testing I completed my results and overclock was fake.
It's like school or college, you need to study to understand
Which ROM is best to be used with late autumn kernel. When I install late autumn kernel on any ROM ,the camera stops working.
LuanHalaiko said:
Look, I'm tired from explaining that CPU overcloks are fake, just freaking search about snapdragon 410, the processor is LOCKED, PLL overclock is not possible without external source file help, only Moto g3 osprey have this file, when somebody port's that file to our source, I will be wrong
Also if you don't even know how to overclock a device, how can you say that I'm wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds like a stage I'm currently going through, are there any recommended resources for learning?
The main direction is to reverse the kernel code for the purpose of changing system settings

Categories

Resources