flicker on slow motion video with slow light - Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Questions and Answers

i have already read the other post but i do not understand if is normal or not, please explain me if this is normal or not, i have buyed the phone 2 days ago on the bottom found the video of the slow mo.
Sorry for the bad english im italian .

GamerHateYou said:
i have already read the other post but i do not understand if is normal or not, please explain me if this is normal or not, i have buyed the phone 2 days ago on the bottom found the video of the slow mo.
Sorry for the bad english im italian .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's normal. don't worry..
basically. the science behind this is that electricity is not constant.
it has cycle. like 60hz or 50hz if i'm not mistaken.
thus, the light is actually flickering all the time, it's just that our eyes are not fast enough to capture it.
slow motion camera on the other hand, capture images faster than our eyes. therefore the "flicker".
here's an explanation that you can read.
http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/10938/perception-of-a-rapidly-flickering-light

Related

[QUESTIONS] APN, Fluidity, Screen

Hey all, and especially the lucky owner of HD 2.
I am wondering about several stuff about the HD 2 (i got the HD1)...
First,
In the past, i had a SE (now cost around 70 €) and the APN was really better than the one on the HD1. I mean, it was easy to make photo even with lack of luminosity, and a small move at the moment the picture was taken, wasn't making the picture blurred.
That's something i am really missing on my HD1, an average APN. What do you think about it? Did they improve the APN, or is it still a **** APN, like on all the HTC device ?
Important : I am not hoping to have good pictures like with a reflex APN, I am just wondering if the HTC HD 2's APN (600€) was finally as good as (or better) a ****ty SE (70€).
Second,
Compared to the HD1, do you think it's a big improvement? What about the fluidity, is it really improved compared to the HD1?
Third,
When i use an iPhone, i've got real difficulties to write, due to the small and the capacitive screen. I am from the HD1, and I was loving the screen. Is it still easy to write message with the HD2 keyboard & screen?
Finally
Thank you very much. Really sorry for my english, i hope it's understable..
video/pics demo:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-XoUL7nUpA&feature=player_embedded
Thank you, but it's not answering me at all.
All the pictures are taken in sunny conditions. The HD1, with a lot of luminosity took excellent picture. What about middle luminosity & darkness condition ?
Thank you
im just a little messenger with an old topaz ... xmoo was going to test in different conditions using a HD1 and a HD2 thouh, so i guess we'll have to wait for the results
sony ericssons phonecamera on the k810i was almost better than our home camera in good conditions, they do real good cameras...
cheers!
Yes it's easy to type on the screen because it is huge! It's almost as fluid as the iPhone and it is blazing fast. In comparison to my old raph it's a big difference. Sorry where that you questions?
Edit: I think your APN question is about the led (or camera steadiness). The led is good, I'm not overly impressed with the picture quality but I havent tested it very thoroughly,
12
Edit 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-XoUL7nUpA&feature=player_embedded
My real main question is about the APN.
With my SE, it was easy to make photo even with lack of luminosity, and a small move at the moment the picture was taken, wasn't making the picture blurred. With the HD1, it's making this, what about the HD2 ?
Check out the you tube film and judge for yourself,
12
No, because the youtube film is in sunny condition.
The HD1 was a really good APN in sunny condition, but directly there were a small lack of luminosity, it was blurring the picture.
I am awaiting for the ximoo comparative picture, hope it's coming soon..
Zepiii said:
No, because the youtube film is in sunny condition.
The HD1 was a really good APN in sunny condition, but directly there were a small lack of luminosity, it was blurring the picture.
I am awaiting for the ximoo comparative picture, hope it's coming soon..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At the end he/she shows pictures in the dark....
Well, i watched it all, and the tennis ball picture isn't enough for me...
To be fair, phone cameras are never going to be that amazing guys.
If you really care about good camera quality, buy a small digital camera.
OH MY GOD !
It's always the same stupid answer...
As said in the post 1, I am coming from a Sony Ericsson before the HD1 which had a really GREAT APN compared to the HD1. I am asking if the HD2 finally got a decent APN as CHEAP SonyEricsson phone, and not if i want to buy a small digital camera !
UP...
Any news about the APN? Does someone having the HD2 made some test compared to the HD1 ? Mainly in darkness condition ?
Thank you
What's this "APN" thingie you keep talking about? Do you call the camera "APN" or is it some camera's feature/spec?
"Zepiii" please explain what is "APN" ?
You start a thread or post a question several hd2 threads about "APN"... But nobody knows wtf is it..
I think you mean "auto white balance", "iso sensivity" or something like that.. I'm google it last 10 minutes but no luck... (Believe me, 10 minutes for googling (!) is very loong time for me...)
Please enlight us about "APN"...
APN = Appareil Photo Numérique
It's a french expression that means camera.
DocteurN said:
APN = Appareil Photo Numérique
It's a french expression that means camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So yeah, we should all know a french expression? .
Well I dont care too much for the camera, I have an iPhone at the moment and that one takes terrible pictures also. Those pics are only good for looking back on the phone itself. If you transfer them to your pc, they look really bad.
Oh yeah sorry !
APN is french, i totaly forgot !
APN = camera !
Well, if I've learned anything today (and I haven't) I am going to go about calling every single camera I come across from now on an APN. I like it.
I thought he was talking about a wifi access point

X10 video quality

h t t p :// www .youtube.com/watch?v=ZCXi59I9ZyM
Doesn't look promising...
(Sorry about the url mangling, but I'm apparently not allowed to post links)
Yeah, it looks really crappy. However, it is not what I would base my purchase on. But it seems like it might take some time to get the 2.1 update. 2 bad tha I have already bought the phone. But I think that I'll like it, wether it has multi touch and a good video camera or not.
Looks like a low light video, the frame rate, and color don't look bad, but shaky affect is annoying. I would like to see an outdoor video though.
sonus said:
I would like to see an outdoor video though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Indeed....
hey I have tested the video at low light seens at a HOLIDAY ON ICE SHOW and it looks real good not like that crap from the link above...
my video is smooth, clear and sharp... and its real low light with only light is from the show light...
Could you please upload the movie? So that we could see the quality? it would be interesting to see it
Some test videos:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAgBnmTUfas
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4REPjG8YHU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGv2CvpLq9M
well the video quality wasn't bad but no "HD" recording i guess :/
what resolution is the phone recording at when it is at its highest?
Looks good! better than my Nexus One!

video camera blurry?

Hello , I instaled eb13 via samsungs downloadable exe and the first time it was really laggy and buggy so I thn went into basic system recovery and iped data and such and then did it again and now I have an awesome smooth runnign froyo aside from the browser checkerboard and the video camera. Tghe browser I can deal with but what gives witgh the video camera? It is horrible when your moving quick its extremely blurry. This was not the case before and there is no real logical reason for the downgrade. I don't get it since I'm on a bug free froyo now. Anyone found a fix?
I have the same issue
Same here with the camera. Dunno about the browser as I use Dolphin HD.
The camera only presents the lag in low-light conditions it seems. It did not do that with DK28 or DI18.
Some users report not having this issue but do not mention low-light vs. high-light.
Ran update through Samsung's exe.
i've noticed this as well
Damn this sucks.....I lways braged to my girl that the recording was better vs her evo shift lol. Now its eaxctly the same. What a crock. I doubt they'll reease an update to fix it with there laz asses. I'm rlly just wondering if its an issue with the method of installing or eb13 in general and or if devs can fix it.
Yup, I didn't know I had this issue until coming across this thread. The video is fine in good light conditions but recording in low light produces blurry and bad video
Basboy said:
Yup, I didn't know I had this issue until coming across this thread. The video is fine in good light conditions but recording in low light produces blurry and bad video
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
YES, its all because of low lighting. I took a video today and the quality is AMAZING, I love my epic
except for the fact that now we can't saves picture messages. Once they fix that and the checker boarding on the browser--this phone is perfect.
I'm trying to remember if it was Sprint who released an update shortly after the Moment's camera fiasco (same thing..updated to 2.1 and camera went laggy) or if it was a developer who fixed it and released it on SDX.
Anyone else remember that?
Same here
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
ae69ae said:
YES, its all because of low lighting. I took a video today and the quality is AMAZING, I love my epic
except for the fact that now we can't saves picture messages. Once they fix that and the checker boarding on the browser--this phone is perfect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
to save picture messages, long press on the message and select "attached items." you can then check the item and hit save button to copy to sd
Same here in low light on highest res setting.
YES!!! I think I might have been the first to point this out yesterday...desparately need a fix
Sent from my baked and emotionless SPH-D700
squshy 7 said:
YES!!! I think I might have been the first to point this out yesterday...desparately need a fix
Sent from my baked and emotionless SPH-D700
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
BUMP!
This an absolutley tragic problem ,lol. I have recorded outside and its still blury when moving so idk.
Would like to get this looked at asap....just switched from evo to epic for the camera and froyo......actually mostly for the keyboard I'm loving it..
delete ...
Yeah, video recording is totally screwed up. The framerate drops along with the lighting/increased ISO. My room is dimly lit right now, and I can point it at my monitor and it records at a nice smooth framerate, but as soon as I pan over to a dimly lit area of the room, the framerate tanks to like no higher than 5 fps. I didn't expect EB13 to be much if any better than DK28, but so far it's worse. How can Samsung drops the ball every time, and they spent how many months working on this update?
Im really having no problems after wiping data and cache and all that and then flashing besides this problem with the camera. It seems to be a problem for 95% of us. How did the other 5% not get this problem lol.
carnivalrejectq said:
Im really having no problems after wiping data and cache and all that and then flashing besides this problem with the camera. It seems to be a problem for 95% of us. How did the other 5% not get this problem lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or the other 5% haven't figure it out yet...till they need to record something like us
Here's what I think is going on with the video problems:
I've looked at videos I shot on Eclair, and in low light it just didn't have any sensitivity at all. Anything below an average room lighting was just pitch black. But, the video stayed smooth.
On Froyo the camera app appears to try to reduce the frame rate to increase the sensitivity of the camera. You can see images in VERY dark environments, but with only a few frames a second.
Neither option is very good but I think I like dark video over 4 frames a second.
I'm guessing there is a hidden parameter somewhere that controls this. Something like a mimimum ISO setting.
Yea its a pain in the ass because of what it considers low light. I live in an old house so evenwith the lights on where I can see everything with my eyes the camera decides that its low ligt. So basically to have reg freamerates I have to be in a warehouse or outside in the sun? This is not acceptable lol. I like to take videos out and about at night and at concerts wich is usually dark.....as well as at m home of my daughter and now I can't. Hopefully your right and it meanss someone can go in there and change it back.

How many have the HD recording framerate problem

I recently bought a Samsung Galaxy S2 & like other on here suffer from the framerate drop when recording HD indoors, but works perfectly fine outdoors.
To me this isn't a massive problem, as i find for indoor use 720x480p perfectly fine, and i don't suffer from either the pink spot, bad screen or the overheating that other have reported, and don't want to run the risk of returning my phone just to get the same problem again with the other faults added.
Anyways those that suffer from this please post your camera firmware, just to see if this framerate drop is link to just a certain firmware type or not.
Mine is
SCEF02
TBEC28
ixon2001 said:
I recently bought a Samsung Galaxy S2 & like other on here suffer from the framerate drop when recording HD indoors, but works perfectly fine outdoors.
To me this isn't a massive problem, as i find for indoor use 720x480p perfectly fine, and i don't suffer from either the pink spot, bad screen or the overheating that other have reported, and don't want to run the risk of returning my phone just to get the same problem again with the other faults added.
Anyways those that suffer from this please post your camera firmware, just to see if this framerate drop is link to just a certain firmware type or not.
Mine is
SCEF02
TBEC28
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Take a screen shot of a pure white wall or something similar, I'm pretty sure you'll find a pink spot in the center of the image
Anyways, have you tried updating the camera firmware?
Look here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1098834&highlight=camera
I have OCED11 & TBEC28, and I have 29fps @ 1080p.
Sorry if this was off topic, just trying to help
In low light situation this affects probably a majority of the users.
ixon2001 said:
I recently bought a Samsung Galaxy S2 & like other on here suffer from the framerate drop when recording HD indoors, but works perfectly fine outdoors.
To me this isn't a massive problem, as i find for indoor use 720x480p perfectly fine, and i don't suffer from either the pink spot, bad screen or the overheating that other have reported, and don't want to run the risk of returning my phone just to get the same problem again with the other faults added.
Anyways those that suffer from this please post your camera firmware, just to see if this framerate drop is link to just a certain firmware type or not.
Mine is
SCEF02
TBEC28
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, same firmware versions, phone made in china by samsung. Severe stuttering in low light conditions.
bruflot said:
Take a screen shot of a pure white wall or something similar, I'm pretty sure you'll find a pink spot in the center of the image
Anyways, have you tried updating the camera firmware?
Look here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1098834&highlight=camera
I have OCED11 & TBEC28, and I have 29fps @ 1080p.
Sorry if this was off topic, just trying to help
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even in low light or night conditions? I have [email protected] in low light condition, if iset exposure to -2, but the framerate is still unstable.
Just did a 1080p recording in the dark with only the television on, got 21 frames per second, the video was still pretty good IMHO especially for the conditions under which I made the recording
EarlZ said:
In low light situation this affects probably a majority of the users.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would be interesting to know whats the ratio of this problem on the sold devices.
What about making a poll?
achillies400 said:
Just did a 1080p recording in the dark with only the television on, got 21 frames per second, the video was still pretty good IMHO especially for the conditions under which I made the recording
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very low.. do you have sinusoidal noise on your video? In my case i got sinusoidal noise when i take videos of tv/monitors or lamps under certain light conditions.
I too get the bad framerate when its auto focusing in low light areas, especially indoors. However, outdoors it always performs flawlessly even when its focusing. Lowering the video quality to 720p doesnt help. I guess its a hardware optimisation thing? Im sure the 1.2 GHz exynos is more than capable of 1080p recording anywhere.
Poll added
I have the opposite problem, outside 30fps seem a bit too few, the videos are slightly flickering...
DrSlump76 said:
Even in low light or night conditions? I have [email protected] in low light condition, if iset exposure to -2, but the framerate is still unstable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
25fps?
I thought it was limited to 30...
DrSlump76 said:
Very low.. do you have sinusoidal noise on your video? In my case i got sinusoidal noise when i take videos of tv/monitors or lamps under certain light conditions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm no camera specialist, if you are talking about the glare that comes off the television screens, then yes I had that, the quality was acceptable to me, especially considering the fact that I can make phone calls, send text messages, browse the internet, make tweets, browse facebook and google+, play games among other things.
I think if you want absolutely the best to record videos or take pictures, a smart phone may not be the best device, there will be shortcomings...
Finally! This problem is solved by ICS 4.0.3 + lgCamera!
yorkmolko said:
Finally! This problem is solved by ICS 4.0.3 + lgCamera!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what do you mean with lgCamera? is there an camera application pulled from lg firmware or is there an chipset solution?
It's not been fixed, don't be delluded
gestalt24 said:
what do you mean with lgCamera? is there an camera application pulled from lg firmware or is there an chipset solution?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"lg camera" is an app for every android devices which gives you change bitrate up to 20mb/s, framerate and in 1280x720p mode manual ISO.
---------- Post added at 11:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:46 PM ----------
yorkmolko said:
Finally! This problem is solved by ICS 4.0.3 + lgCamera!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can solve this problem like that... Open "LgCamera" in video mode select resolution and set to 1280x720 and set ISO from "auto" to "100". Now switch between photograph and video mode again. Thats it! You can get 29 fps in every place even a lot darker places. Of course the video file will be darker cause the ISO. The last thing as I sick, "LgCamera"s video quality is very bad though these good features.
Same effect in stock camera app but lowering "exposition" to -2

A better slow motion experience?

Hi guys
The samsung galaxy note 3's slow motion video is quite bad
I tried both 120fps at 1/4 and 120fps at 1/8.
The output is very low quality comparing to iphone 5s slow motion.
Any feedback is welcome.
Do you know a better slow motion app?
Do you have a recommended settings?
Thanks
Can you post some video of it. I'd love to see it.
Sent from my GT-I9505G
Actionx1 said:
Can you post some video of it. I'd love to see it.
Sent from my GT-I9505G
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdB4z0JZU_o&feature=c4-overview&list=UU9U7YdFdlBQHo7moeKPFcFA
Your right, it doesn't look that great. The people walking by on the left look a bit Blurry. That really sucks.
Sent from my GT-I9505G
Actionx1 said:
Your right, it doesn't look that great. The people walking by on the left look a bit Blurry. That really sucks.
Sent from my GT-I9505G
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This feature was the only thing keeping me from flashing an AOSP rom onto my note. Looks like I'll be rocking ParanoidAndroid!
nooooo not the slow mo
henihazbay said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdB4z0JZU_o&feature=c4-overview&list=UU9U7YdFdlBQHo7moeKPFcFA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
damn bummer man (
henihazbay said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdB4z0JZU_o&feature=c4-overview&list=UU9U7YdFdlBQHo7moeKPFcFA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
was that at 1/8? or 1/4. 120FPS at 1/8 is still gonna give you a pretty choppy 15fps even if you export the video at 30
from what it looks like, the iphone 5 usually goes to 1/4 which would still be smooth at 30
i noticed discrepancies in different note 2 slow mo videos and how they did things.
projectvirtue said:
was that at 1/8? or 1/4. 120FPS at 1/8 is still gonna give you a pretty choppy 15fps even if you export the video at 30
from what it looks like, the iphone 5 usually goes to 1/4 which would still be smooth at 30
i noticed discrepancies in different note 2 slow mo videos and how they did things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was 1/8 but 1/4 is no different.
Slow mo in note 3 sucks unfortunately.
henihazbay said:
It was 1/8 but 1/4 is no different.
Slow mo in note 3 sucks unfortunately.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think it has a problem: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BLiCKiLFbM
Here's a video from sam pullen at 1/8 and its noticeably more smooth than your sample
This same also looks pretty decent: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WL1BfkzPQ5I
however, like i mentioned above, this would one would look better if he shot at 1/4 instead of 1/8 simply because then you're voluntarily reducing it to 15 FPS.
Additionally, looking at iphone5 slomo videos, it's pretty apparent that their movie editor to set the slomo sections does make use of interpolation. Thus, if you really wanted to use the slomo for anything beyond just a for fun thing, and you're editing a video of a trip or something with slow mo sections, just take that 1/4 footage, run it through twixtor and bam, you can even do stuff like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0Kb1hDdseY
Basically. don't shoot at 1/8 unless you plan to interpolate it.
Apple's slowmo is post processed, so feel free to compare the two after you post process your own
granted, its more convenient the other way, i THINK the HTC gallery might handle that. considering the camera got ported a few months ago, it's possible the gallery will get ported to make help make slowmo clips on the fly.
projectvirtue said:
I don't think it has a problem: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BLiCKiLFbM
Here's a video from sam pullen at 1/8 and its noticeably more smooth than your sample
This same also looks pretty decent: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WL1BfkzPQ5I
however, like i mentioned above, this would one would look better if he shot at 1/4 instead of 1/8 simply because then you're voluntarily reducing it to 15 FPS.
Additionally, looking at iphone5 slomo videos, it's pretty apparent that their movie editor to set the slomo sections does make use of interpolation. Thus, if you really wanted to use the slomo for anything beyond just a for fun thing, and you're editing a video of a trip or something with slow mo sections, just take that 1/4 footage, run it through twixtor and bam, you can even do stuff like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0Kb1hDdseY
Basically. don't shoot at 1/8 unless you plan to interpolate it.
Apple's slowmo is post processed, so feel free to compare the two after you post process your own
granted, its more convenient the other way, i THINK the HTC gallery might handle that. considering the camera got ported a few months ago, it's possible the gallery will get ported to make help make slowmo clips on the fly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well if you find your example videos decent then we are not on the same page.
I found those quiet ****ty. Event the one with seagulls, the original poster hated his own video.
About iphone5's slow mo, I don't care what iPhone software does. The outcome is 10 times better than Note3 unfortunately. And I find dumb to say ''use 1/4'' when there is a 1/8 option.
It reminded me of people who pretend to be happy about their phone's battery life by saying ''Don't enable wifi and 3g. Reduce the brightness and don't sync your email''
henihazbay said:
Well if you find your example videos decent then we are not on the same page.
I found those quiet ****ty. Event the one with seagulls, the original poster hated his own video.
About iphone5's slow mo, I don't care what iPhone software does. The outcome is 10 times better than Note3 unfortunately. And I find dumb to say ''use 1/4'' when there is a 1/8 option.
It reminded me of people who pretend to be happy about their phone's battery life by saying ''Don't enable wifi and 3g. Reduce the brightness and don't sync your email''
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol ok there buddy, no need to get pissy. Just offering and explanation and solution to your so called "problem"
At the end of the day, 1/8 will come out to 15 FPS in a 30 FPS video. Have you ever played a game at 15 FPS? Its bad. Why would a 15 FPS video magically be better. No matter what, that fact is not going to change. If a few at 1/8 is smooth at 30 FPS, then there is additional interpolation going on. If you actually have the pride to get something done yourself, figure it out, it's not hard. If you want to sit there and continue to whine in the same tone you just did, then you're more than welcome to return your note and get yourself an iPhone, noone will really care.
Quite franky, if I were to speak like you, "i don't care" if you cant get your slomo to look nice, because I know I will be able to. It's the same thing with goPro slow motion video. Have you seen what the RAW looks like? not pretty. Why do those videos look so good? interpolation and post processing. If there was an App on android that handled that, then you can run off and buy it and stop whining. But until then, you will either have to make do....or abandon it.
Just to summarize things again for you in case you actually want to put some work into it rather than complain.
1) If you want to go to 1/8, you'll need to interpolate, period, that's just how it works, learn some video basics if you need to
2) The easiest way for you to do that with the best quality is using sony vegas + twixtor
3) If you want to go deeper into it, I use premiere/after effects + twixtor.
Doing 2000 FPS shots are pretty fun but basic rules of video apply, none of this is magic.
Also seagulls? Have you never seen a duck in your life before?
projectvirtue said:
Lol ok there buddy, no need to get pissy. Just offering and explanation and solution to your so called "problem"
At the end of the day, 1/8 will come out to 15 FPS in a 30 FPS video. Have you ever played a game at 15 FPS? Its bad. Why would a 15 FPS video magically be better. No matter what, that fact is not going to change. If a few at 1/8 is smooth at 30 FPS, then there is additional interpolation going on. If you actually have the pride to get something done yourself, figure it out, it's not hard. If you want to sit there and continue to whine in the same tone you just did, then you're more than welcome to return your note and get yourself an iPhone, noone will really care.
Quite franky, if I were to speak like you, "i don't care" if you cant get your slomo to look nice, because I know I will be able to. It's the same thing with goPro slow motion video. Have you seen what the RAW looks like? not pretty. Why do those videos look so good? interpolation and post processing. If there was an App on android that handled that, then you can run off and buy it and stop whining. But until then, you will either have to make do....or abandon it.
Just to summarize things again for you in case you actually want to put some work into it rather than complain.
1) If you want to go to 1/8, you'll need to interpolate, period, that's just how it works, learn some video basics if you need to
2) The easiest way for you to do that with the best quality is using sony vegas + twixtor
3) If you want to go deeper into it, I use premiere/after effects + twixtor.
Doing 2000 FPS shots are pretty fun but basic rules of video apply, none of this is magic.
Also seagulls? Have you never seen a duck in your life before?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I saw one duck only. Replying in xda threads
Don't get pissy dude. I apologize if I sound too aggressive.,
At the end of the day all your suggestions are helpful and I appreciate for that.
I just meant to say that I am not happy with the outcome of the slow mo when comparing it with iPhone 5's slow mo.
But I respect the fact that you're happy and you like it. That's it.
Thanks again.
I look forward to a potential update from Samsung
henihazbay said:
I saw one duck only. Replying in xda threads
Don't get pissy dude. I apologize if I sound too aggressive.,
At the end of the day all your suggestions are helpful and I appreciate for that.
I just meant to say that I am not happy with the outcome of the slow mo when comparing it with iPhone 5's slow mo.
But I respect the fact that you're happy and you like it. That's it.
Thanks again.
I look forward to a potential update from Samsung
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No worries, I appreciate the change in tone.
I know what you mean, and I feel the same way (on the fly interpolation would be awesome), but if HTC can do it, then i'm sure it's only a matter of time before it gets ported or somebody else writes one on the play store.
As for vegas and twixtor, i'm not allowed to post torrent links or anything like that but both are very popular and should only take 30 minutes to download and you'll be able to do a lot more cool stuff with it anyways.
I was also bitterly disappointed in the slow motion capture on my note 3
Its not that the capture or frame-rate is bad its the overall quality
recording in a 720p resolution don't mean S*%T if the bit-rate is S*%T
Every video ive tried is very distorted and pixelated should never be possible in a 720p hd clip
Samsung needs to better optimise the capture and encoding
did you take off the plastic on the lens?
hehe jk..
johentie said:
did you take off the plastic on the lens?
hehe jk..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol
it looks ok i suppose on phone but when you attempt to watch on tv omg it looks like it was taken with a Nokia 3210 and they didnt even have cameras
While it is a shame the videos are not a tad clearer, seeing as how my htc one x's slow motion was choppy as hell when i had one, im happy enough with it, i'll only be using it for stupid things anyway, lol...like this...http://youtu.be/UAxXLZDnPrY. (next im planning to film a small air cannistor bunged on a bonfire and the resulting explosion!)
and here it is. http://youtu.be/N4ff9DsoU28
http://youtu.be/w-qnRMHdfXI
Well.... (DON'T FIGHT!)
Stop Fighting, Guys!
iPhone and Note are both 1280x720@120fps but there's another huge problem:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/gal...ion-function-t2904242/post56013525?styleid=18
And well, another one but not equal to this thread
henihazbay said:
Hi guys
The samsung galaxy note 3's slow motion video is quite bad
I tried both 120fps at 1/4 and 120fps at 1/8.
The output is very low quality comparing to iphone 5s slow motion.
Any feedback is welcome.
Do you know a better slow motion app?
Do you have a recommended settings?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know what:
See this
Slow motion is a gimmick. It's just a normal video slowed down, there is no 120fps capture going on.

Categories

Resources