Post antutu benchmark , geekbench or quadrant scores! Please... - Galaxy S III General

hi guys! i created this thread to see what are your benchmark scores on s3...
If you are willing to post your benchmark i would like you to post a screenshot of your score
antutu ... around 38 k
quadrant 12k
geekbench 1701 multicore 540 single core
blekota note 5 , boeflla kernel , oc 1.7ghz , zram , no gpu overclock..hi guys! i created this thread to see what are your benchmark scores on s3...
If you are willing to post your benchmark i would like you to post a screenshot of your score
antutu ... around 38 k
quadrant 12k
geekbench 1701 multicore 540 single core
blekota note 5 , boeflla kernel , oc 1.7ghz , zram , no gpu overclock...
I dont know how to add screenshots

Thread closed.
Duplicate.
Please use:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s3/general/i9300-post-benchmark-scores-t1733197
Also, please search before posting.
Thanks.

Related

Your kernal and rom combo's..

Hello i am new and looking to learn a little bit.My next question for you all is what kernal/rom combinations do you use? what are your quadrant/linpack scores and what is your battery life like??
I am using
Epic experiance rom
With xtreme kernal
setcpu overclocked to 1.2 conservative
Quadrant 1030
Linpak 9.591
PyRo
Heroic Epic w/ Extreme Kernel
SetCPU 1.2 GHz Interactive
Quadrant = 988 (1200 when oc'd to 1.6GHz)
What do you mea by linpack/quadrant scores? I'm a bit new to rooting and haven't seen anyone talk about that yet
quadrant and linpack are available in the market
quadrant benchmarks cpu,I/O and 3d graphics
linpack behcmarks the cpu and looks at floating point operations per second.
PyRo

ROM HIGHEST QUADRANT ? / galaxy 3 highest quadrant score ???

can anybody tell me how much highest quadrant score you got .. and in what rom/kernel .... plz if possible make a rom with highest quadrant score and 10point multitouch ( atleast 1100 points quadrant plz )
anxdateamcool said:
can anybody tell me how much highest quadrant score you got .. and in what rom/kernel .... plz if possible make a rom with highest quadrant score and 10point multitouch ( atleast 1100 points quadrant plz )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The samsung galaxy 3 is a very good basic smartphone that has evolved a lot since its release but I don't think you really understand what your asking here
As far as I know the highest multitouch points for this phone is 5 points so 10 is a little exaggerated
About the Quadrant score: a quadrant score doesn't reflect the full true capacity of your phone its based on a number of properties of the rom kernel etc. there are a bunch of tweaks to get a high quadrant score but a score of 1100+ is slightly overrated
A high quadrant score is of course fun to show off to your mates, but only the user experience can show the real capacity of your mobile phone
look my signature for my highest score on the G3
Blackyx007 said:
The samsung galaxy 3 is a very good basic smartphone that has evolved a lot since its release but I don't think you really understand what your asking here
As far as I know the highest multitouch points for this phone is 5 points so 10 is a little exaggerated
About the Quadrant score: a quadrant score doesn't reflect the full true capacity of your phone its based on a number of properties of the rom kernel etc. there are a bunch of tweaks to get a high quadrant score but a score of 1100+ is slightly overrated
A high quadrant score is of course fun to show off to your mates, but only the user experience can show the real capacity of your mobile phone
look my signature for my highest score on the G3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 to that mate..
Sent from my hybrid g3
Kyorarom Infinity b2 powered by
g3mod 2.1 Final OC
Moderator Message
@OP
YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING!!!

[Q] CM9 performance i9001

Hi everyone,
I had installed CM9 RC2 by ivendors and it's graet
there is some lag using UI and it's very slow loading cantacts.
How can I increase performance? now i check only 16bit transparentcy.
thanks
Carlo
Use CastagnaIT's kernel and adreno jelly beam drivers from galaxy w.
Smooth UI, all games work well, 4400 antutu score @ 1.4Ghz and smartassV2
Do not use app killers and manual kill only aps that you don't use often.
Good luck and Pm if you need links.
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda app-developers app
Invendor RC3 Release, it is recommended
benchmark results
thank you everyone.
I try different setting to find best performance.
the results of my benchmark are shown below ( 16bit transparentcy checked ):
Invendor rc3.1
4028 antutu score
2446 Quadrant Standard score
Invendor rc3.1 + CastagnaIT Kernel v6.3 @ 1.4Ghz and smartassV2
4175 antutu score
2538 Quadrant Standard score
Invendor rc3.1 + CastagnaIT Kernel v6.3 @ 1.4Ghz and smartassV2 + JB Adreno libs
4127 antutu score
2651 Quadrant Standard score
bye
Frankly speaking i don't see any problem with low performance slow device etc...
Updated to RC3 yesterday and I'm glad to have it.
Typed with my I9001

[BENCHMARK] GN2 kernels benchmarks

These are the result of the benchmarks done to the kernels that are being developed (4 Apr 2013) for the Samsung Galaxy Note 2 .
The settings used are the default that come with N7100XXDMB6 on a GN2 baseband N7100XXDLK7. The changes from the stock areas follows , rooted, TWrecovery 2.3.3.2 , 240 dpi. Brightness used during test 100 %, WiFi on, Nova Launcher Pro, Force GPU rendering (enabled) under Developer options, Power saving option OFF, GPS off , Screen rotation on, sound on 100%, multiwindow active.
Kernels used Stock mb6, Perseus 34.2, Adam 2.2.1 , Neak 1.7
Applications used 3dMark 1.0.0-875 , RL Benchmark:SQLite 1.3 , Vellamo 2.0.2 , CF-Bench 1.2 , AnTuTu Benchmark 3.2.2 , PowerTutor 1.4
Addition applications Linpack for Android 1.2.8, Pi Benchmark 1.0, Quadrant Standart 2.1.1, Geekbench2 2.4.2, SD Tools 3.0.
Methodology used : The benchmarks were run in sequence 1 minutes after a clean reboot was done (cleaning cache and dalvik-cache).
Explanation about the results,
3dMark has 2 scores the first is the normal and the second the extreme suite (Higher is better).
RL Benchmark:SQLite measures the time in seconds needed to dullfill the tests incuded ( smaller is better).
Vellamo has two scores first is HTML5 and second is the metal suite score ( Higher is better).
CF-Bench has three scores first is native score, second is java score and third is overall score ( Higher is better).
AnTuTu just the overall result ( Higher is better).
PowerTutor measures the power usage in milliWatt for the last 5 minutes ( smaller is better).
Linpcack for Android measures floating point performance of the system , has two numbers first is single thread second is multi threaded score in Mflops (higher is better).
Pi benchmark measures the time in seconds to calculate pi, I settled for 200 000 numbers ( smaller is better).
Quadrant Standart 2.1.1 ( higher better).
Geekbench2 2.4.2 cross platform bench ( higher better).
SD Tools measures the read and write speed in Mb/s from the sdcard, first number is writting speed second is read speed (higher better).
Results :
Stock MB6
3dMark 3339x2502
Sql 14.837
Vellamo 1763x610
CFbench 26604x7402x15082
Antutu 16979
Powertutor 803 mW
Perseus 34.2
3dMark 3034x2305
Sql 14.482
Vellamo 1743x612
CFbench 26027x7407x14855
Antutu 17140
Powertutor 816
Adam2.2.1
3dMark 3203x2421
Sql 20.406
Vellamo 1776x619
CFbench 26253x7423x14955
Antutu 17311
Powertutor 805
Neak 1.7
3dMark 3199x2432
Sql 15.855
Vellamo 1710x624
CFbench 26934x7558x15308
Antutu 15911
Powertutor 810
Stock MB5
3dMark 3312x2476
Sql 14.54
Vellamo 1753x610
CFbench 25915x7355x14779
Antutu 17268
PowerTutor 807 mW
Stock MC3
3dMark 3282x2474
Sql 15.181
Vellamo 1768x599
CFBench 26544x7652x15208
Antutu 17024
PowerTutor 502 mW
Linpack 64 x 211
Pi 200 000 53.67
QuadrantS 6991
Geekbench 2059
SD Tools 6.0x12.5
Abyss 2.3.1
3dMark 3200x2387
Sql 14.334
Vellamo 1740x619
CFBench 25870x7077x14595
Antutu 16780
PowerTutor 500 mW
Linpack 62 x 68
Pi benchmark 53.29
QuadrantS 7149
Geekbench 2105
SdTools 6.2x14.9
RedPill 1.42
3dMark 3145x2379
Sql 16.854
Vellamo 1502x618
CFBench 25297x7373x14542
Antutu 16927
PowerTutor 501 mw
Linpack 62x129
Pi benchmark 53.12 s
QuadrantS 6635
Geekbench 2005
SdTools 6.4x12.8 Mb/s
Devil 0.12
3dMark 3177x2315
Sql 14.668
Vellamo 1744x604
CFBench 24850x7335x14341
Antutu 17227
PowerTutor 508
Linpack 64x124
Pi benchmark 53.79
Quadrant S 6661
Geekbench 1696
SdTools 5.8x12.6
The intention of these test is to show the devs their strength/weakness regarding the benchmarks area. These benchmarks are purely synthetic which means they DO NOT represent real life scenario usage.
I am opened to every suggestion possible for further monthly or bimonthly benchs.
Edit: For accuracy have to clarify that about the difference in results with PowerTutor due to removing of an application that used exactly 300 mw the results of the recent test show 300 mw less than the previous ones.
Adam Kernel
Thanks, good job
Would you prefer the Adam Kernel ?
dianlb50 said:
Thanks, good job
Would you prefer the Adam Kernel ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock has given me no problems so far, it seems it gives a perfect middle point for my usage, as for the optimizations done to specific kernels, the efforts of the dev is not well represented in the results of such simple bench tests bcs the results are within margins of error of such test, but again have to stress out that these are purely synthetic benchs therefore DO NOT apply to real life scenarios.
Here you go fully stock non-rooted xxDMB5.
hagba said:
Here you go fully stock non-rooted xxDMB5.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Added results for the Stock MB5 on the OP.
Added results for Stock MC3 , RedPill and Abyss kernels. plus some additional benchmark tools.
Stock DMB5, Perseus Kernel
@ 1.8 ghz.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
The point of the tests is to compare the kernels performance side by side in the same environment/setup in MY device, using the DEFAULT settings (no tweaking or OC) with which they are delivered to end user, and if you are careful to notice, I have included MORE than just a simple Antutu result aiming to be as close as possible to real usage scenarios.
abauer said:
The point of the tests is to compare the kernels performance side by side in the same environment/setup in MY device, using the DEFAULT settings (no tweaking or OC) with which they are delivered to end user, and if you are careful to notice, I have included MORE than just a simple Antutu result aiming to be as close as possible to real usage scenarios.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My bad, but the OP is TL;DR.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
ThankS for posting
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Added Devil kernel results.
Perseus 35
Geekbench
Quadrant
Sql
Antutu
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2

[Q] for UK i9505 -whats yours- anututu benchmarking scores

this is a post for SiV users to leave benchmark scores, il update the op with daily new highscores, for the haters, battery life isnt an issue when i have a plug, and benchmarks matter to me
Highest score
25086
ROM..................stock i9505
KERNEL............stock
PATCHES.........none
INFO............1.9ghz X4 performance
please leave a description of ROM and Kernel and what ever patches you have set up, with cpu, governor, sd-cache, i/0 scehduler profile etc etc......
thanks in advance,
i just beat the octo core version on 3d graphics on antutu , but only that category lol
here' mine
all stock, unrooted, I9505XXUAMDF
my results , all stock
My best Antutu score on Stock Rom is: 26003

Categories

Resources