Database Users

Quadrant/Neocore scores based on ROM/Kernel/SetCPU/SDCard

Just thought about gathering up some info on Quadrant scores and possibly correlate that to ROM/Kernel/MicroSD setup in order to figure out the best combination. I understand that Quadrant scores are somewhat subjective and Kernel code along with HD2 Android Builds are constantly changing, but it would still be interesting to see the tendencies in the performance.
Here is my most recent result:
Quadrant Score: 2046
Neocore Score: 31.8fps
ROM: [Build][21.10.2010][NexusHD2-FRG83 V1.5 PPP + RMNET (Froyo 2.2.1)]
Kernel: Hastarin 7.7
SetCPU: 1152/1152/ondemand
MicroSD: Transcend 8GB Class 6
Please note that I ran Quadrant and Neocore multiple times and I am showing the highest score achieved. I recommend you to do the same. I have seen 1994, 1997, 2015, 2017.
Here is Quadrant Score breakdown:
CPU - 6405
Memory - 1139
I/O - 1958
2D - 309
3D - 418
I noticed that 2D and 3D scores are not fluctuating as much as the other scores, though overclocking does slightly increase their values.
Thanks,
-CJ

Here is my most recent result:
Quadrant Score: 1570
ROM: Mdeejay evo sense 2.2 rEVOlution
Kernel: Hastarin 7.7
SetCPU: 1152/1152/interactive
MicroSD: Transcend 8GB Class 6

Here is my most recent result:
Quadrant Score: 2350
ROM: Mdeejay evo sense 2.3 rEVOlution
Kernel: Hastarin 7.7
SetCPU: 1152/1152/interactive
MicroSD: Kingston 4GB Class 4

Yosef said:
Here is my most recent result:
Quadrant Score: 2350
ROM: Mdeejay evo sense 2.3 rEVOlution
Kernel: Hastarin 7.7
SetCPU: 1152/1152/interactive
MicroSD: Kingston 4GB Class 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's quite some result!
Quadrant Score: 1500-1700 (varies quite a lot)
ROM: Mdeejay FroYo HD v.3.7
Kernel: Hastarin 7.7
SetCPU: 250/1152/conservative (performance doesn't change score)
MicroSD: Sandisk Class 6 (Ultra version)
I think it would be useful for those who have quadrant advanced to post the breakdown of their score to see exactly how everyone differs so much.

Not to be a buzzkill but a synthetic benchmark result from any of these programs doesn't really mean anything. It's more than possible to have a high linpack/neocore/xyz benchmark result and have a sluggish, unresponsive UI. You can do all sorts to Android to inflate your score but what counts is being able to use the phone day to day, with no problems.

how are you guys running neocore. my phone keeps telling me i dont support qualcomm accelerated graphics. then it force closes.
ive tried nearly all android builds, with a variety of available kernels.
none of them seem to allow me to run neocore. however i can get a 2k score in quadrant advanced.

removed.

malaeus said:
how are you guys running neocore. my phone keeps telling me i dont support qualcomm accelerated graphics. then it force closes.
ive tried nearly all android builds, with a variety of available kernels.
none of them seem to allow me to run neocore. however i can get a 2k score in quadrant advanced.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Neocore FC could be a kernel issue (and/or maybe related to stagefright). Try Hastarin's 7.7 kernel and/or make sure stagefright is enabled.

Reno_79 said:
Not to be a buzzkill but a synthetic benchmark result from any of these programs doesn't really mean anything. It's more than possible to have a high linpack/neocore/xyz benchmark result and have a sluggish, unresponsive UI. You can do all sorts to Android to inflate your score but what counts is being able to use the phone day to day, with no problems.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agree 100%

Reno_79 said:
Not to be a buzzkill but a synthetic benchmark result from any of these programs doesn't really mean anything. It's more than possible to have a high linpack/neocore/xyz benchmark result and have a sluggish, unresponsive UI. You can do all sorts to Android to inflate your score but what counts is being able to use the phone day to day, with no problems.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read the OPs post again.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App

Virtuous XooM v1.1.2 HC 3.2 Benchmarks very nice rom

I installed this rom the other day and so far everything works except the screen rotation lock button but no rom has that working.
Frst its HC 3.2 ported over from the xoom has the new feature of being able to upscall the smaller apps to the larger screen.
Over clocking is built in just get set cpu and off you go.
My acer is over clocked to 1.5 and here are my benchmark scores.
Useing Quadrant I got 3421 (best of three runs) and frame rates around 45
Useing Linpack I got 45.438 mflpos on single thread in 1.85 seconds and
71.53 mflops on multi-thread in 2.36 seconds again best of three runs
Useing AnTuTu Benchmark I got a score of 6159 and frame rates right at around 60 fps
Useing Vellamo (its new and a benchmark tool for a tablets browser to see how ell the browser performs does things like java and flash stress tests and load speeds of web pages) I got a score of 1072
These are the top 4 bench mark tools for android and these scores while may not look impressive are awsome. in comparisons on benchmark tools grafs these score are much higher them most tablets.
bottom line this tablet rocks.
If your into benchmarking and tweaking as I am please post your results here list benchmark toos used,scores and with rom your running and cpu speed. so we can get and over all view of this remarkable tablet.

I got 1291 from Vellamo using Stock 3.1 with custom Kernel Taboonay CPU 1408Mhz

same rom, same oc, similar scores XD this tablet does rock!!!!!!

[Q] really slow a500/ quadrant score 656???

Hi,
as i'm using my iconia a500 i noticed some heavy Performance issues. i rooted and installed several Roms but my Quadrant score keeps being low. right now i am on lightspeed 1.0.1 with Richard's Kernel and my Quadrant score is only 656!!!
i'm really curious about this any suggestions?
thanks in advance
kiark

Just a guess, but the cpu probably is not running full during the test. Might have to use a app to force to 1000 during the test.

Running 2.4 kernel? If so, the default intersctive scaling governor is borked so either use setcpu to change to on demand or flash back to 2.3. Im personally running 1.6ghz as max speed with on demand.

thank u very much, setting the cpu up with setcpu worked!

CPU really does not have much effect on quadrant score. It is the combination of the Rom and the kernel it self.
Sent from my SGS-t959 using XDA Premium App

IM using the xoom 3.2 rom
My acer is over clocked to 1.5 and here are my benchmark scores.
Useing Quadrant I got 3421 (best of three runs) and frame rates around 45
Useing Linpack I got 45.438 mflpos on single thread in 1.85 seconds and
71.53 mflops on multi-thread in 2.36 seconds again best of three runs
Useing AnTuTu Benchmark I got a score of 6159 and frame rates right at around 60 fps
Useing Vellamo (its new and a benchmark tool for a tablets browser to see how ell the browser performs does things like java and flash stress tests and load speeds of web pages) I got a score of 1072

naturallight said:
CPU really does not have much effect on quadrant score. It is the combination of the Rom and the kernel it self.
Sent from my SGS-t959 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not sure on this. if it doesnt have much effect why do you see such a huge difference between 216 Mhz and 1.5 Ghz clock speeds in quadrant?

ROM HIGHEST QUADRANT ? / galaxy 3 highest quadrant score ???

can anybody tell me how much highest quadrant score you got .. and in what rom/kernel .... plz if possible make a rom with highest quadrant score and 10point multitouch ( atleast 1100 points quadrant plz )

anxdateamcool said:
can anybody tell me how much highest quadrant score you got .. and in what rom/kernel .... plz if possible make a rom with highest quadrant score and 10point multitouch ( atleast 1100 points quadrant plz )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The samsung galaxy 3 is a very good basic smartphone that has evolved a lot since its release but I don't think you really understand what your asking here
As far as I know the highest multitouch points for this phone is 5 points so 10 is a little exaggerated
About the Quadrant score: a quadrant score doesn't reflect the full true capacity of your phone its based on a number of properties of the rom kernel etc. there are a bunch of tweaks to get a high quadrant score but a score of 1100+ is slightly overrated
A high quadrant score is of course fun to show off to your mates, but only the user experience can show the real capacity of your mobile phone
look my signature for my highest score on the G3

Blackyx007 said:
The samsung galaxy 3 is a very good basic smartphone that has evolved a lot since its release but I don't think you really understand what your asking here
As far as I know the highest multitouch points for this phone is 5 points so 10 is a little exaggerated
About the Quadrant score: a quadrant score doesn't reflect the full true capacity of your phone its based on a number of properties of the rom kernel etc. there are a bunch of tweaks to get a high quadrant score but a score of 1100+ is slightly overrated
A high quadrant score is of course fun to show off to your mates, but only the user experience can show the real capacity of your mobile phone
look my signature for my highest score on the G3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 to that mate..
Sent from my hybrid g3
Kyorarom Infinity b2 powered by
g3mod 2.1 Final OC

Moderator Message
@OP
YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING!!!

Performance of Quarx 5/12 CM10 compared to other ROMS

I have a question regarding performance. I have a MB525 (red lense), with the JORLA_U3_3.4.2_108-2_R02_SIGNED_USAJORDMR1B25RETLALA01F.0R_JORLAFRORETLALA_P008_A005_M001_HWp3_WIG147146_Service1FF as my base ROM. I'm currently on Quarx's 5/12 CM10 ROM, and performance is really good, the user experience is the smoothest I've had in all the ROMs I've flashed. I'm using Interactive Governor, and my OC settings are 300/20, 600/35, 800/45, 1100/59. Now the deal is that for some reason Quadrant benchmarks give me a really low score, lower 2D and I/O scores, even though I feel that the actual user performance is a lot better with the 2nd Boot ROM.
I must admit that with my current Vsel settings, this is the lowest I've ever undervolted, and in my previous benchmarks I might have been OC'd to 1.2 ghz, but I don't think a 100 mhz difference would change the scores that much, especially regarding the I/O score.
Should I be worried about this drop in score? Or is Quadrant simply acting up?

Antiga Prime said:
I have a question regarding performance. I have a MB525 (red lense), with the JORLA_U3_3.4.2_108-2_R02_SIGNED_USAJORDMR1B25RETLALA01F.0R_JORLAFRORETLALA_P008_A005_M001_HWp3_WIG147146_Service1FF as my base ROM. I'm currently on Quarx's 5/12 CM10 ROM, and performance is really good, the user experience is the smoothest I've had in all the ROMs I've flashed. I'm using Interactive Governor, and my OC settings are 300/20, 600/35, 800/45, 1100/59. Now the deal is that for some reason Quadrant benchmarks give me a really low score, lower 2D and I/O scores, even though I feel that the actual user performance is a lot better with the 2nd Boot ROM.
I must admit that with my current Vsel settings, this is the lowest I've ever undervolted, and in my previous benchmarks I might have been OC'd to 1.2 ghz, but I don't think a 100 mhz difference would change the scores that much, especially regarding the I/O score.
Should I be worried about this drop in score? Or is Quadrant simply acting up?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm in the same situation.
Same phone, same cm10 quarx rom...
1200 in quadrant, i have
400 32vsel
700 40vsel
1000 54vsel
1300 67vsel
Lowest score: 2d graphics and i/o.

Very interesting Would be nice if someone could explain it.
I tested some roms with Antutu and Quadrant.
WiuiGB:
Antutu 2912-3131
Quadrant 1883
MiuiICS (Braun's):
Antutu 2272
Quadrant 1755
CM10 (Quarx's Early April Nightly 2ndboot):
Antutu 3064
Quadrant 1167
Quadrant score is much lower on CM10 with 2ndboot, but Antutu is pretty high.