Related
Hi guys... DEVS
Why aren't any NON-undervolted Android builds being released?
Many people have HD2's where the CPU cannot be undervolted/overclocked and if they try any of the current Android builds their HD2 will reboot or be very unstable!! I think that could be why we have so many "reboot threads" floating around.
Best way to make sure users don't have problems with your builds is to provide the non-undervolted version by default and let people change the zImage to an overclocked/undervolted version if they wanna push their luck. Stability should be the number one priority and in my mind and overclocking/undervolting certainly doesn't add stability... instead you'll have a bunch of people wondering Android doesn't work on their HD2's.
I think that for many nOObs it's difficult to first download a build just to discover that it doesn't work, then trying to figure out that it's because they're running the wrong kernel, then trying to figure out how to change the kernel, pushing files etc etc... you get my point I hope Also supporting extended batteries should be included by defaults nowadays since that's another source of confusion as to why their Android builds won't work.
Just my 2 cents... /Tubgirl
Tubgirl said:
Many people have HD2's where the CPU cannot be undervolted/overclocked [...]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why? And how can one find out that his/her HD2 cpu cannot be undervolted?
Hastarin started releasing this type of kernel, without overclocking, undervolting or axi included, http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=787588
Since it's the only custom kernel I'm using I can't point you to others but I also know that the 'official' kernels from Netrippers' autobuild site, http://oe.netripper.com/files/htcleo_autobuild_evo_tree/ are also without any modifications but they don't include extended battery support or interactive governor for example.
o.moe said:
Why? And how can one find out that his/her HD2 cpu cannot be undervolted?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The answer to "Why?" is that you have small variations between each CPU from manufacturing. They are very small variations but they are enough to cause some CPU's to become unstable if you go outside the manufacturer's specs when it comes to voltage or clock frequency.
If you have problems with reboots then "how to find out" is a matter of trying a non-undervolted kernel and see if Android becomes more stable. But as I said... I wish developers could release rock-stable Android builds that can work on everybody's HD2's... not just the lucky ones with overclockable/undervoltable CPU's.
Brgds... /Tubgirl
Ah, will it not affect battery life? I just remember i didn't seem to experience sudden lags or reboot with the first batch of android builds (there hasn't been custom kernels that time i think) i used xtarantula's before.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
apeatan said:
Ah, will it not affect battery life?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, maybe but that's still better than not being able to run Android at all.
/Tubgirl
The short answer to this question is demand. More people want undervolted than not. You can change kernels if it fails for you. It's all supply and demand I'm afraid. As the old saying goes "you can't please everyone"
You are right though it would be nice if they included a standard kernel build as well but the devs put in a massive amount of work as it is and its easier for you to change the kernel that's all.
Sent from my HTC HD2
No need for "builds" to be duplicated like that...all that is required is untouched kernel...
I run the Stock Evo one for HD2 from here and NO SOD/reboots/data hangs and equal battery life even without setcpu and taskkillers.
Try it...(Not suitable for CM6 builds)
v-b-n said:
No need for "builds" to be duplicated like that...all that is required is untouched kernel...
I run the Stock Evo one for HD2 from here and NO SOD/reboots/data hangs and equal battery life even without setcpu and taskkillers.
Try it...(Not suitable for CM6 builds)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will that work with extended batteries?
Brgds... /Tubgirl
Tubgirl said:
Will that work with extended batteries?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. The only "support" atm for extended batteries is in modified kernels such as my kernel (huanyu added support based on mine in one of his too) and michyprima's.
Since both are essentially "hacks" (at least mine is not 100% accurate for temperature) I'm afraid neither is likely to make it in to the main tree.
Moved to Android General discussion for HD2 as not development
v-b-n said:
No need for "builds" to be duplicated like that...all that is required is untouched kernel...
I run the Stock Evo one for HD2 from here and NO SOD/reboots/data hangs and equal battery life even without setcpu and taskkillers.
Try it...(Not suitable for CM6 builds)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This might be a dumb question, but how do we know which zImage to use from that list? Do I just grab the last one that says latest? I'm running the MDeejay Evo build. The SOD and data hangs have made these new builds unusable for me.
Finally a NON-undervolted Android build that works out of the box. As a big bonus extended batteries are supported as well... and it's fast as hell
Have a look... http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=9789864
Brgds... /Tubgirl
Tubgirl said:
Finally a NON-undervolted Android build that works out of the box. As a big bonus extended batteries are supported as well... and it's fast as hell
Have a look... http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=9789864
Brgds... /Tubgirl
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't you realise that undervolting is part of the kernel? It has nothing to do with the build.
the_scotsman said:
Don't you realise that undervolting is part of the kernel? It has nothing to do with the build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I realize that, but so far the chefs have chosen to include undervolted kernels causing trouble for people like myself.
Now we have a chef that goes for stability and has included a kernel that should work for everybody!
Brgds... /Tubgirl
Tubgirl said:
Yes I realize that, but so far the chefs have chosen to include undervolted kernels causing trouble for people like myself.
Now we have a chef that goes for stability and has included a kernel that should work for everybody!
Brgds... /Tubgirl
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a very simple process to replace the kernel with another one of your choice.
the_scotsman said:
It's a very simple process to replace the kernel with another one of your choice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly!! So if you want to tweak and try undervolting/overclocking you can replace the kernel if you want to... IMHO the included kernel should be as stable as it possibly can
Brgds... /Tubgirl
Tubgirl said:
Exactly!! So if you want to tweak and try undervolting/overclocking you can replace the kernel if you want to... IMHO the included kernel should be as stable as it possibly can
Brgds... /Tubgirl
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes and the point is that it is as stable as it can be for the vast majority of us. The minority (you) who have reboot issues etc have the choice to use different kernel then what the majority uses.
Why on earth should the majority have to conform to the minority?
TheATHEiST said:
Why on earth should the majority have to conform to the minority?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not a matter of having to "conform". It's better to have a build that works for everybody than just the majority (again IMHO). It's nice for the Chef not having to deal with a bunch of posts like "My phone reboots with this build" or "Why does my HD2 freeze?"
To cite myself from my first post in this thread:
Best way to make sure users don't have problems with your builds is to provide the non-undervolted version by default and let people change the zImage to an overclocked/undervolted version if they wanna push their luck. Stability should be the number one priority and in my mind overclocking/undervolting certainly doesn't add stability... instead you'll have a bunch of people wondering why your build doesn't work on their HD2's.
I think that for many nOObs it's difficult to first download a build just to discover that it doesn't work, then trying to figure out that it's because they're running the wrong kernel, then trying to figure out how to change the kernel, pushing files etc etc... you get my point I hope. Also supporting extended batteries should be included by defaults nowadays since that's another source of confusion as to why their Android builds won't work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Brgds... /Tubgirl
i am truely sorry for you having problems.. but this thread looks to me like another "i want i want, do it for me" thread. I dont want to be rude, but do you really think that would stop people asking "weird" questions? Even if there would exist a perfect uber build or something, people wouldnt stop asking "weird" stuff.. human nature i guess
i have a different view on things here. i like the "harder" (search, read and try) way, that makes me learn something. So, the way cheffs create and release builds cant be that bad
learning english is also a good thing for me, i guess
cheers
Hi
The Desire HD kernel source is available at http://developer.htc.com/
exelent
Wow momy, now that you have milk, give me the HD camera port.
Saaaweeet! Mdeejay should get a hold of this soon!
Yay! Does this mean that we will have a Camera on the Desire HD ROM soon?
C'mon devs, make us proud owners of HTC Desire HD2!!!
And darkstone
elgrego4 said:
And darkstone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope so! He has been busy lately but im sure we will be impressed very soon by one of the amazing devs around here.
whoever fixes it first gets a cookie =D
Cerv3r said:
whoever fixes it first gets a cookie =D
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And a few donations!
Me so happy! Now, all i want for this Xmas is... that's right!
N A N D !!!
Great news. New challenges for the guys, my guess is that they will love this.
And we all love/appreciate the work they doing. It´s a Win - Win : )
Great news, and now Camera HD for HD2
Great, hopefully also help with the PPP issue
Big news for HD lovers as me and greats chance for our dear developers ... thanks to all developers for continuos support ...
Camera ?
NAND ?
That is a good news.
Now waiting.
Theoretically it should be not much more than finding the references to the HD camera sensor (S5K3H1GX) and make sure that the HD2 sensor (s5k3e2fx) is referenced there. The source for the HD2 sensor is available in the published kernel source. Now we only need a cook to do it.
first want to see that they have published whole kernel and not everything except the camera ( i know they are watching us ) and ofcourse they dont like it if we finish the build .
waiting patiently for the devs and hope they fix it soon
GL
ok, a noob question, but with this release can developers now make a ROM that can replace windows mobile on the device memory or does this just fix minor glitches like the camera? if this relese does NOT do this wht will it take for us to have a rom that no longer has to be used from the memory card? thanks in advance.
Veldmuus said:
first want to see that they have published whole kernel and not everything except the camera ( i know they are watching us ) and ofcourse they dont like it if we finish the build .
waiting patiently for the devs and hope they fix it soon
GL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Camera stuff seems in there allright. I already had a quick peek.
steve austin said:
ok, a noob question, but with this release can developers now make a ROM that can replace windows mobile on the device memory or does this just fix minor glitches like the camera? if this relese does NOT do this wht will it take for us to have a rom that no longer has to be used from the memory card? thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, this will not enable the NAND procedure. Actually, what gain do you expect from that except faster booting? The current SD version is a bit slower on startup but changing and upgrading is a breeze compared to NAND and you can have multiple versions installed and even the option to boot WM if you really feel the urge. With a fast SD card I doubt that Android will run much faster in flash mem.
So if you really prefer Android in firmware you will have to wait until the chefs are ready cooking this version (which probably should happen in the next month or so)
MrDroopy said:
No, this will not enable the NAND procedure. Actually, what gain do you expect from that except faster booting? The current SD version is a bit slower on startup but changing and upgrading is a breeze compared to NAND and you can have multiple versions installed and even the option to boot WM if you really feel the urge. With a fast SD card I doubt that Android will run much faster in flash mem.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not fully understand what is the difference between NAND and SD boot. Is it really the case that after the boot system is sitting in the NAND... or maybe simpler Yes/No question:
After the NAND boot system is in THE SAME STATE as after the SD boot. The ONLY difference is that I have Android folder on SD card? (YES/NO)
Hi ,
I have used almost al roms for the Desire Z , many are exelent , many bad.. But no-one rom is perfect. For example you can flash CM7 , very good Rom and super fast but the visuals are not like Sense..Or you can flash for example a Sense ROM , very good visuals but not so much ram , and laggy sometimes.
So this guide is for user that want to have Sense Rom's running well , and to speed up their device.
Here there are my suggestions to help you , if your sense-rom is not fast as you want , and it's laggy.
All of this suggestion try for your own risk.
Ok let's start legit..
First of all , do not use live wallpapers , because your CPU will load to much , even if you have overclocked it.
Move your apps-games into the SDCard , in this way you will keep more possible your device "clean"
Overclock your device , alias Desire Z. You can choose between a lot of kernels , my suggest is not to overclock it more than 1.3Ghz or you will have to re-boot your phone many times. I use Unity's Kernel wich allows swap , and overclocking to 2Ghz. And i remeber , to have a clean overclocking you need free ram , or your phone will be not responsable.
Use the v6Supercharger with the option "Mega Ram 2" , this is a very good script and working , i got +30MB of ram with using this script wich is a very good solution if you have a sense-rom like me. link is here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=991276
I add if you use the script to not use task-killers
Swap your SDcard , honestly i do not get to much advantages with doing it , but meybe for someone will be interesting
For now this are my small suggest's , when i will have another suggestions i will update the thread
Many links:
Swap -> http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1323447
v6Supercharger -> http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=991276
Unity Kernel http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1121937
Rom suggestion: RcMix 4.0 by NRGZ , the fastest sense-rom for now with sense 3.5
Maybe you should fix your language and your interpunction.
It makes me crazy.
Or you could use Sense 2.0 (a.k.a. Stock) until ICS is up and ready, as it has good looks AND performance.
At least that's what I did. Got sick of jumping from one ROM to another on a weekly (sometimes even daily) basis just to find one that runs smooth.
Shame, though, really love Sense 3.5.
No offence but this thread pretty useless. Mostly everybody knows about these.
Maybe you should put this in the General section so new users can know what to do.
Just my opinion.
Looks like our new mod will be doing some housekeeping pretty soon.
SWEET THREAD!
not...
DarkMio said:
Maybe you should fix your language and your interpunction.
It makes me crazy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How to fix my lenguage? With flashing english on my brain?
Z!GZA!G said:
No offence but this thread pretty useless. Mostly everybody knows about these.
Maybe you should put this in the General section so new users can know what to do.
Just my opinion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not true. If you think that all we are devolpers , you are right.
xdadevolpers said:
How to fix my lenguage? With flashing english on my brain?
That's not true. If you think that all we are devolpers , you are right.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You were supposed to open this thread in Android General Thread Section (treaks and etc.), but not here. So, wrong thread section yet pretty useless.
xdadevolpers said:
How to fix my lenguage? With flashing english on my brain?
That's not true. If you think that all we are devolpers , you are right.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Language. By flashing English onto my brain.
DevElopers. Not devolpers.
xdadevolpers said:
How to fix my lenguage? With flashing english on my brain?
That's not true. If you think that all we are devolpers , you are right.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Effing ROFLMAO. Well played, non-English speaking guy, well played.
Sent from my VS910 4G using XDA App
After trying all these awesome tips my DZ is flying!!! Like..... really flying..................
Yikes guys, take it easy on the him eh?
He's only trying to be helpful, and there are a few things I just read that I did not know beforehand.
"to have a clean overclocking you need free ram"
I have noticed that my phone does slow down when I opened/exited many apps, no matter how much I overclock it. I do resort to using a rudimentary task killer at times to free up ram on CM7. That's the only way my device becomes snappy again. Either that or reboot.
The G2 has a healthy amount of RAM, but can be overwhelmed a little easily.
And yes, our phones cannot handle live wallpapers with ease. You can notice a little lag. I guess the G2 is not as high end as I once thought it was.
I'd like to know from another source before we take the better overclocking with free ram idea as gospel.
Anyone confirm this? Not through testing - with actual facts?
captainreynolds said:
I'd like to know from another source before we take the better overclocking with free ram idea as gospel.
Anyone confirm this? Not through testing - with actual facts?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not so much that more ram = better overclock but rather more free ram = more cached processes = less calculations needed to be done by the cpu so THEORETICALLY fast processing
It's very useful tip.. for me at least.. ..thanks man..
Same here thanks for the info
It's got some useful tips actually.
But it should probably be moved to the General section.
Thanks op.
his username is xdadevolpers - so obviously this thread should be moved to the brand new devolpment section
hey, I have a tip for OP - I heard that iPhones really are the best, you never even have to remove the battery, they even got rid of that pesky battery door!
xdadevolpers said:
How to fix my lenguage? With flashing english on my brain?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You posting this thread is retarded, but that was pretty clever. hahahaha
WTF? said:
his username is xdadevolpers - so obviously this thread should be moved to the brand new devolpment section
hey, I have a tip for OP - I heard that iPhones really are the best, you never even have to remove the battery, they even got rid of that pesky battery door!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your bridge is waiting for you trolllllll
As a rather advanced user (but not a dev), I can't see any benefit to the official 2.3.5 update. So far the only "features" I've experienced are the locked bootloader, and some odd touchscreen sensitivity.
I might have asked this elsewhere, but what is the benefit of this update, from a dev's point of view, such that it's now necessary for the latest ROMs?
Please offer your answer in plain English, but feel free to include relevant jargon, I'll understand it.
Thanks in advance...
Sent from my u8800 using xda premium
Hi there.
I'm not a dev but I think it has something to-do about 2.6.35 kernel.
Sent from my u8800 using XDA App
It's slightly faster then .32 kernel especially in cm7 with the new adreno drivers and all. Other than that i do not see any difference as a non developer.
hteles said:
I think it has something to-do about 2.6.35 kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
btrst said:
It's slightly faster then .32 kernel especially in cm7 with the new adreno drivers and all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah, that'd be it. Cheers. ^_^
btrst said:
Other than that i do not see any difference as a non developer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I for one don't see any difference, even with GPU performance.
Except that my touchscreen is extremely sensitive. Literally the only advantage it has for me is that I can use the latest ROMs here on XDA.
Would it not be possible to simply use this kernel with the stock firmware somehow? That way we'd have our /.cust_backup pink screen thing back ^_^
crispybbq said:
As a rather advanced user (but not a dev), I can't see any benefit to the official 2.3.5 update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok... stopped reading right there!
...
Well, maybe it might be worth reading the second sentence...
crispybbq said:
So far the only "features" I've experienced are the locked bootloader, and some odd touchscreen sensitivity.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, I'm definitively not going to read any further...
An advanced user that can't see any benefit on updating from 2.1 to 2.3 and it's only perception from the update is a couple of rants that people insist on spreading through this forum.
2.3.5 has better camera/video quality, HDR photos, SRS WOWHD sound, .35 kernel (way better than .32), better graphics drivers (nenamark2 = 29 fps --> more than optimus 2x, sensation XE, galaxy nexus...), it can play 720p videos from youtube desktop page without any lag, sms call reject menu, sending MMS with wifi and more When I upgraded to 2.3.5 I tought that I am going to switch to custom ROMs immediatly but after using it for a while I dont even think about switching to custom ROMs
I would say it is necessary. New AMSS, new libs, new kernel... All new ROMs will propably be sooner or later on the new kernel.
About locked bootloader, B518 release has it unlocked, you could flash that.
Thank you yannn007 and Blefish for clarifying.
However...
VuDuCuRSe said:
Ok... stopped reading right there!
[...]
Ok, I'm definitively not going to read any further...
An advanced user that can't see any benefit on updating from 2.1 to 2.3 and it's only perception from the update is a couple of rants that people insist on spreading through this forum.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Le sigh.
Sorry about that... I wasn't clear on the my original post, and can understand why you've come to that conclusion. Please allow me to update myself:
I have installed the update, mostly so I could try the ROMs that need it to function, like the early CM9 port, and the latest CM7 and MIUI ROMs. (currently using Geno's latest CM7 build)
What I meant by "advanced user" was that I know what I'm doing, and (to a reasonable extent) how these devices work.
Anyone who had clear knowledge on the benefits of this update for use in CM7 could use jargon (or at least, not have to oversimplify or explain the technical bits) without me being totally bedazzled by it.
Having been using CM7 before I braved the official update, I also most definitely know the benefits and added features of Gingerbread versus Froyo (not 2.1 Eclair... )
I guess I haven't noticed the improvement in GPU performance, having not been very involved in GPU-intensive activities (my U8150 has no GPU at all, so I guess I'm still in the habit of avoiding those kinds of things)
(Also the u8150 benefits hugely with CM7)
Blefish said:
I would say it is necessary. New AMSS, new libs, new kernel... All new ROMs will propably be sooner or later on the new kernel.
About locked bootloader, B518 release has it unlocked, you could flash that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Aha, this is exectly the kind of info I was looking for, thank you. My main puzzlement is now this:
While I'm okay with the locked bootloader (I'm generally careful when messing with /.cust_backup) and can accept the official update despite it...
Could the new kernel code not simply be included with an update, thus saving the bootloader interface? Or is the process of updating the kernel a lot more complex on the U8800 than it was with the U8150? Or perhaps some other factor that I don't quite understand?
Dang, I feel like a noob all over again
edit:
yannn007 said:
2.3.5 has better camera/video quality, HDR photos, SRS WOWHD sound, .35 kernel (way better than .32), better graphics drivers [...] t can play 720p videos from youtube desktop page without any lag, sms call reject menu, sending MMS with wifi and more [...] I dont even think about switching to custom ROMs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm. I guess I didn't try the GPU stuff, as mentioned above in my post.
As far as the user experience was for me, there are some features in CyanogenMod that I just can't pass up, even despite the extra awesome I now know to be in the official software.
U8800 Pro owner here. The battery life with GB more than impressive comprared to what I had with Froyo. With GB it's not a big problem if I forget to charge the phone at the end of the day, it still has enough power to last one more day (having in mind I won't play or use navigation). With Froyo the phone was nearly dead by the end of the day even with 100% charge in the morning.
So, make your choice.
I'm now port ics to i9001 (galaxy s plus)
if it working i upload download to forum
I's port from i9100 galaxy s 2
Nice let us know if it's working, I hope this try will succeed
Sent from my GT-i9001 @ LionROM
Hope you will succeed
Awesome
Good Luck!
Hm too bad I've heard this so often
Anyway good luck
have you tried?
guys can you please tell me what is so cool about ics?
why everyone wants that?
xewier its very nice you will try that but it will never work 100% until there are more official ics roms!
I´ve tested with samsung gio and evo 3d ics and to be honest it isn´t so special...
don´t get me wrong I appreciate that all guys here would love that and I don´t have any problem with that but I think its wasted time...
you could see developing rom as a challenge
in my opinion it is fun to port something and afterwards you could say yeah i ported ICS to our device
so let the people do their work and dont criticise them
since its their time they can do with it what they want ;-)
and btw
good luck!
okay thanks for all
but in dsixda's kitchen have option port from another device and i try galaxy s 2 original ics and the porting ended and lost ported file :S please help sorry for my bad english
fabsau said:
guys can you please tell me what is so cool about ics?
why everyone wants that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1- a lot of new features and options (lockscreens, widgets, multitasking interface, swipe to remove notification etc etc etc ... )
2- gpu accelerated interface (unlike froyo nad GB that use CPU accelerated) , which obviously saves some cpu power.
3- if someone ports it, it would be AOSP , so more free RAM and less samsung crap =>better multitasking and performance in general.
4-better looking UI and theming
and a lot more, but i think these are enough to make a point
just write 99 at the main menu and get the ported rom at the "output zip" folder
xewier said:
okay thanks for all
but in dsixda's kitchen have option port from another device and i try galaxy s 2 original ics and the porting ended and lost ported file :S please help sorry for my bad english
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the main problem would be the kernel itself, if you use the S2 kernel your phone will be bricked in no time. watch out
bogac94 said:
just write 99 at the main menu and get the ported rom at the "output zip" folder
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you man!
broodplank1337 said:
the main problem would be the kernel itself, if you use the S2 kernel your phone will be bricked in no time. watch out
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im try to change kernel to vitalityy kernel
thank for attention
keep up the good work. i hope it'll work and we'll reach ics forever !
Blumdum said:
you could see developing rom as a challenge
in my opinion it is fun to port something and afterwards you could say yeah i ported ICS to our device
so let the people do their work and dont criticise them
since its their time they can do with it what they want ;-)
and btw
good luck!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the challenge arguement is funny and true =)
I didn´t and I don´t want to critize the people who are actually porting something for our phone, I just don´t get why ICS is so important for all people (excepted the challenge factor) The real big changes in ics are faceunlock (which we will maybe become with the next stock rom) a new launcher and new settings can be make...
Please don´t think I totaly against Ics, it would be nice to have it, but I think with the troubles we will have to face with ics we could instead build a stable cyanogenmod 7.2...
(just a little opinion from one lonely guy )
---------- Post added at 11:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:05 PM ----------
rayiskon said:
1- a lot of new features and options (lockscreens, widgets, multitasking interface, swipe to remove notification etc etc etc ... )
2- gpu accelerated interface (unlike froyo nad GB that use CPU accelerated) , which obviously saves some cpu power.
3- if someone ports it, it would be AOSP , so more free RAM and less samsung crap =>better multitasking and performance in general.
4-better looking UI and theming
and a lot more, but i think these are enough to make a point
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1,2,4 I dont disagree with this points....
3. ICS would have more performance as stock-rom, but I´m the opinion that cyanogenmod would be more quicker, because ics needs more ram then 2.3.7 does
-->Cyanogenmod quicker then ICS
If I´m wrong I would like to get corrected...
fabsau said:
3. ICS would have more performance as stock-rom,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes we all agree on that , but we are all aware the samsung will not give us an official ics rom, so there's nothing much we can do about it.
but I´m the opinion that cyanogenmod would be more quicker, because ics needs more ram then 2.3.7 does
-->Cyanogenmod quicker then ICS
If I´m wrong I would like to get corrected...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the answer to this is related to my first reply, of course when u have a stock rom, the hardware should work as it should, cyanogenmods (all versions) usually have issues with cameras for example, especially if they don't have the drivers for it. and this matter is not the only issue with cyanogen, they have other bugs too, but they also introduced a lot of tweaks and new stuff. so in the absence of an official rom (which we would tweak) , porting is our only option.
fabsau said:
1,2,4 I dont disagree with this points....
3. ICS would have more performance as stock-rom, but I´m the opinion that cyanogenmod would be more quicker, because ics needs more ram then 2.3.7 does
-->Cyanogenmod quicker then ICS
If I´m wrong I would like to get corrected...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
then stick to CM9
Wish you best of luck i mostly like to use Stock rom because i don't like to play with the phone. hope that u will port the ICS.
Test install in cwm!!!