Database Users

Accurate benchmarking.

Quadrant is very inaccurate the tests are not up to spec for testing +1Ghz devices accurately.
The reason i say this is due to the fact that the benchmark varies from test to test.
I suggest AnTutu Benchmark.
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.antutu.ABenchMark
It is much more accurate, as the the scores are closely similar time and time again.
The tests are a bit longer
But that is the good thing "accuracy"
It also gives info on each testing stage.
I got 2176 on WB's 007.1 TW rom, BB.67 with custom kernel.

OmegaRED^ said:
Quadrant is very inaccurate the tests are not up to spec for testing +1Ghz devices accurately.
The reason i say this is due to the fact that the benchmark varies from test to test.
I suggest AnTutu Benchmark.
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.antutu.ABenchMark
It is much more accurate, as the the scores are closely similar time and time again.
The tests are a bit longer
But that is the good thing "accuracy"
It also gives info on each testing stage.
I got 2176 on WB's 007.1 TW rom, BB.67 with custom kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good, will give it a try but it'd been better if you post this in themes & apps I guess
by the way what scores do you get with this rom in quadrant?

Chainfire released his new benchmarking tool yesterday, its called CF-Bench, search in the market

i've got 1973 on CM6 006 at 1.1Ghz

benchmarking
It does not matter what benchmarking utility you use. They all give you a general idea of the performance of your phone. I think the OP just wants to use the tool that gives him the score he wants to see.
In reality the score of any phone using any utility is always relative to the scores of other phones using the same utility.
The thing to focus on is not the actual figures you get back but how your device measures up to other phones using the same benchmark test.

kryptoner said:
Chainfire released his new benchmarking tool yesterday, its called CF-Bench, search in the market
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2232 hmm right behind the nexus s
Cm6 wb bb67 custom kernel z
Sent from my X10i using XDA App

Try smartbench 2011. That's the best one
Sent from my x10 on gingerbread

All benchmarking apps generaly suck. Its about how you feel using your phone. Not the numbers.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App

pepy_24 said:
All benchmarking apps generaly suck. Its about how you feel using your phone. Not the numbers.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But it's a good comparison between phones after having a average score for each phone. But like you say, the numbers don't mean anything. Everything is personal.

zodiac100 said:
It does not matter what benchmarking utility you use. They all give you a general idea of the performance of your phone. I think the OP just wants to use the tool that gives him the score he wants to see.
In reality the score of any phone using any utility is always relative to the scores of other phones using the same utility.
The thing to focus on is not the actual figures you get back but how your device measures up to other phones using the same benchmark test.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True about benchmark apps but I don't think I think the OP just wants to use the tool that gives him the score he wants to see. What the OP is saying that with this app the difference between each time's score is not much hence why calling it accurate.

To look for a good benchmark is more important if you use a new phone with dual core CPU cos the old benchmarks aren´t optimised for them. I read that CF-Bench is optimised for dual cores and stresses the CPU and not so much the GPU of the phone.
But interesting that it seems that the overclocking have such a huge influence. With the first run (Wolfbreaks CM6 TW007) i had 2800 points with 1152MHz and in the second run with 998MHz 2400 points.
But true....it´s more a interesting gadget than to take it too seriously

maddes1402 said:
To look for a good benchmark is more important if you use a new phone with dual core CPU cos the old benchmarks aren´t optimised for them. I read that CF-Bench is optimised for dual cores and stresses the CPU and not so much the GPU of the phone.
But interesting that it seems that the overclocking have such a huge influence. With the first run (Wolfbreaks CM6 TW007) i had 2800 points with 1152MHz and in the second run with 998MHz 2400 points.
But true....it´s more a interesting gadget than to take it too seriously
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It comes down to what you have happening in the background.
If your phone suddenly "for example" decides to fetch data off of 3G or suddenly refreshes the media midway thru the bench then it can effect your score. this is why it's best to do tests when the rom is clean and gone silent. "no background activity" with data disabled.
Benchmarking is used to place the current performance of a device in a certain category.
It's no different from benchmarking PC's.
A whole profession has been built around PC benchmarking with people competing for a first place.
If your score is higher than everyone else you win the competition.

i got 2232 on custom kernel at 1113 mhz processor
Sent from my X10 TripNMiUI-IRIS

CF-Bench
Smartbench 2011
Quadrant
Antutu Benchmark
what is the best now?

Wolfbreak said:
CF-Bench
Smartbench 2011
Quadrant
Antutu Benchmark
what is the best now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CF Bench (full version) has the most stable results, and IMO its the best out there.
Sent from my Sony Ericsson Xperia™ phone

Linpack is perfect

kantk20111 said:
Linpack is perfect
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Linpack only tests the cpu.
I haven't checked how CF bench works yet.
will report.

Wolfbreak said:
CF-Bench
Smartbench 2011
Quadrant
Antutu Benchmark
what is the best now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CF bench 101%

Wolfbreak said:
CF-Bench
Smartbench 2011
Quadrant
Antutu Benchmark
what is the best now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Chainfire one!
that thing is scale-able across cores (single/multi-cores) and fairly accurate

Phone specs

What apps do you use to run tests? I used quadrant and got a benchmark over 4500 now at 4300 seems jumpy what others are out there?

Quadrant sucks if you want to compare numbers.
If you want something that is quite stable between runs try AnTuTu. You might also try CF-Bench and 0xbench

Yeah AnTuTu and CF-Bench are definitely the most popular.

thanks guys...
i will try those.

got 5816 with antutu is that good lol

beyorj said:
got 5816 with antutu is that good lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's damn good.
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk

Overview of Jelly Bean (CM10) on the Galaxy S2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVML6Q1Qid4&feature=plcp

theandroidrooter88 said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVML6Q1Qid4&feature=plcp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Must be in General Section Dont worry MODs ll move it

Prashanthme said:
Must be in General Section Dont worry MODs ll move it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, thanks for fixing it.

Might want to move this to the T-Mobile GS2 forum.

Quadrant scores are too less. That stops me from using any Cyanogen Mod ROMS.
So far only F1 Galaxy Nexus ROM remains unbeatable in Quadrant scores (without overclocking or any other kernel) Scored around 3800 :good:
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD

DD-Ripper said:
Quadrant scores are too less. That stops me from using any Cyanogen Mod ROMS.
So far only F1 Galaxy Nexus ROM remains unbeatable in Quadrant scores (without overclocking or any other kernel) Scored around 3800 :good:
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
High Quadrant scores aren't exactly a reliable standard for a ROM being 'good/bad' or 'slow/fast'. I've used CM10 for a few weeks and over 5 runs in a row Quadrant tested 2754, 2330, 2600, 3100 and 2982...
It's nothing more then a short and fast measurement, and the results aren't consistent at all.
I find daily usage of my phone with a smooth, responsive and reliable ROM far more important then the outcome of a few tests that took 1-2 min....
Sent from my GT-9100

DD-Ripper said:
Quadrant scores are too less. That stops me from using any Cyanogen Mod ROMS.
So far only F1 Galaxy Nexus ROM remains unbeatable in Quadrant scores (without overclocking or any other kernel) Scored around 3800 :good:
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actualled loled at your post. Why do mods let noobs make such lame posts? :S

DD-Ripper said:
Quadrant scores are too less. That stops me from using any Cyanogen Mod ROMS.
So far only F1 Galaxy Nexus ROM remains unbeatable in Quadrant scores (without overclocking or any other kernel) Scored around 3800 :good:
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As the firm says many recognized developers:
However, if you put any trust in Quadrant scores you could use them to prove that dancing naked for 5 minutes in your garden affects device performance. By Chainfire
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good:

DD-Ripper said:
Quadrant scores are too less. That stops me from using any Cyanogen Mod ROMS.
So far only F1 Galaxy Nexus ROM remains unbeatable in Quadrant scores (without overclocking or any other kernel) Scored around 3800 :good:
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think Quadrant scores don't mean much. It doesn't really mirror the user experience fluency. It's pretty much just a number.
Just for the record, I've got the score of 4K on CM9.
Sent from my premium potato

ArmorD said:
I think Quadrant scores don't mean much. It doesn't really mirror the user experience fluency. It's pretty much just a number.
Just for the record, I've got the score of 4K on CM9.
Sent from my premium potato
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But it affects gaming performance. I only bought Samsung Galaxy S2 for Gaming purposes not for development n other stuff....
Btw how did u got 4K on CM9..?? You probably must have Siyah or any other kernel and Overclocked ..I scored around 2800 on CM9 on all default settings..Just after I flashed that Rom
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD

DD-Ripper said:
But it affects gaming performance. I only bought Samsung Galaxy S2 for Gaming purposes not for development n other stuff....
Btw how did u got 4K on CM9..?? You probably must have Siyah or any other kernel and Overclocked ..I scored around 2800 on CM9 on all default settings..Just after I flashed that Rom
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A high score during a short test doesn't have anything to do with gaming-performance.
Again: quadrant scores are useless when you're talking about overall performance
Sent from my GT-9100

siedus said:
A high score during a short test doesn't have anything to do with gaming-performance.
Again: quadrant scores are useless when you're talking about overall performance
Sent from my GT-9100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is. If you score less than 3000, heavy games like NOVA 3 gets too much laggy and unplayable (In Multiplayer) unless you over clock.
So I'm not saying that CM10/CM9 is useless, I'm only saying that those ROMS are not good for gaming purposes. You guys are taking my words wrongly.
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD

thats what i found

DD-Ripper said:
It is. If you score less than 3000, heavy games like NOVA 3 gets too much laggy and unplayable (In Multiplayer) unless you over clock.
So I'm not saying that CM10/CM9 is useless, I'm only saying that those ROMS are not good for gaming purposes. You guys are taking my words wrongly.
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not taking your words wrongly, i think you don't understand what i'm trying to explain.
But i think this 'discussion' about quadrant scores is a bit off-topic, so maybe it's wise to end it
Sent from my GT-I9100

Aside from quadrant scores meaning absolutely nothing, it should probably be noted that this video is done on the T-Mobile USA model, the SGH-T989. Which has an inferior chipset/CPU. So of course the scores are low.

Very low benchmark scores.

Hello,
The title says all.
I am getting very low benchmark scores.
In geekbench3: 1200 in single core and 2300 in multi core..
AnTuTu: 44506
What i have done to the moto x style:
unlocked bootloader
Installed supersu and xposed.
Factory reset already done.
Performance seems not that bad actually.
But the scores tells me otherwise.

benchmark scores.
see my screenshots about this issue.

bartjeh1991 said:
Hello,
The title says all.
I am getting very low benchmark scores.
In geekbench3: 1200 in single core and 2300 in multi core..
AnTuTu: 44506
What i have done to the moto x style:
unlocked bootloader
Installed supersu and xposed.
Factory reset already done.
Performance seems not that bad actually.
But the scores tells me otherwise.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If your performance feels good in real world use, why do you need some benchmark to tell you otherwise?

I am on aicp and put xclark kernel to perfromance and got 48k, before i had it on interactive and hotplug on eco performance. No difference felt how device performed.
Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

bartjeh1991 said:
Hello,
The title says all.
I am getting very low benchmark scores.
In geekbench3: 1200 in single core and 2300 in multi core..
AnTuTu: 44506
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Running CM12.1
AnTuTu 51342

Watch this https://youtu.be/8iMRaIsaFX4?t=4m listen from 4:00-4:30. Hilarious
Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

eyecon82 said:
Watch this https://youtu.be/8iMRaIsaFX4?t=4m listen from 4:00-4:30. Hilarious
Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOOOL
Samsung has indeed lagg
JohnMcW said:
Running CM12.1
AnTuTu 51342
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How stable is the latest CM12.1?
Is it ready for daily use?
bradley26 said:
If your performance feels good in real world use, why do you need some benchmark to tell you otherwise?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are absolutely right. I was checking some governor settings. And seemed the governor on the little cores, was not at all optimized. Underclocked now because the speed is decent again

bartjeh1991 said:
LOOOL
Samsung has indeed lagg
How stable is the latest CM12.1?
Is it ready for daily use?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been using it as my daily,
Only one issue that has caused some concerns is that, if you lose the phone signal and you are on gsm,
it switches to cdma and then acts like you don't have a sim card...It can take reboots and hours for it to
return to gsm. However this hasn't happened to me for 5 days now with the newer builds.
My phone hardly ever heats up much with cm12.1...and I DON"T use any processor tweaks.

bartjeh1991 said:
LOOOL
Samsung has indeed lagg
How stable is the latest CM12.1?
Is it ready for daily use?
You are absolutely right. I was checking some governor settings. And seemed the governor on the little cores, was not at all optimized. Underclocked now because the speed is decent again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that video goes to exactly show you why benchmarks don't mean anything
I hate apple, but Apple definitely got it right by saying it is not always all about "hardware specs" and it's more of a coexisting relationship between the hardware and software that is more important.
Samsung definitely has the superior hardware, but their ****ty TouchWiz screws it all up

Antutu benchmark

What is the Best antutu score for note 5
Here is my test score

That's really good; I got 65469
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Don't you have anything installed? I got 45k, all apps closed and bootmanager in action to prevent unwanted apps to startup on boot!

I don't have root just used clean master and greenify app
First run I got 70430

i got 74000+, but you should use PCMARK, as it test the more in more scenarios and kinda replicates your daily usage.
I got enormus score.

how s this? running darthstalker 5 and skyhigh 2.1 undervolted by -100mv and overclocked to 2.4 a57 cores and 852mhz gpu.

That's good I mean very good

Hi,
arter97 lastest beta kernel with Interactive governor tweaked a bit for better performance (enforced_mode set to 1, min_sample_time, go_hispeed_load and hispeed_freq tweaked) and some VM tweaks (dirty_ratio, dirty_background_ratio, dirty_expire_centisecs, dirty_writeback_centisecs and swapiness), no undervolt.
CPU temp at 25 °C at the beginning...

SkyHigh 2.7 kernel, some tweaks like above without overclock / underclock:
I use the previous Antutu version to compare with my other scores when I test some tweaks (as a baseline), it would be time to update Antutu now

My antutu score with antutu 6.0 is about 82k.

m4gg0t said:
My antutu score with antutu 6.0 is about 82k.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i got this using darthstalker 5 and skyhigh 2.7

Not bad, im running all stock. Don't really want to root.

m4gg0t said:
Not bad, im running all stock. Don't really want to root.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as you can see..there are real benefits ) not to mention better battery life and all around usage speed, fluidity...but hey, everybody uses their phone as they want. i m a poweruser...

i have 84089
n920c

junior00027 said:
i have 84089
n920c
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the usual score @ stock rom, kernel is anything from 80.000 to 85.000 so you re perfectly stock with the score

Sent from my SM-N920C using Tapatalk

My first test on Venom Note.
Sent from my SM-N920G using Tapatalk

haree87 said:
Sent from my SM-N920C using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kickoff said:
View attachment 3582674
My first test on Venom Note.
Sent from my SM-N920G using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Guys i m sorry to ruin your parade...but any score in red is not a valid one...sorry. When you will get a green score, post that. I could never get above 100.000 green score (max was around 97-98.000 with skyhigh kernel)..the only kernel that gets me over 110.000 is arter kernel and that is known already to have a bug in the UX Section that causes that big score...

score

Every time I'm getting around 80k on stock, which is slightly low i think.
When comparing the stats to the Note 5 at the ranking table its all the same with exception of the 3d score (garden) with my device always getting around 8.3k compared to 12.112 from Note 5 result from the ranking table.
Why do you think my 3d score is low?
Also I don't know if it's related but I have some sort of lag when scrolling through Facebook, YouTube etc...