Database Users

Stock I9100G Quadrant Scored 4171! Beat stock I9100's Score!

Stock I9100G Quadrant Scored beat stock I9100's Score! i think it will get more score than mod i9100 once have mod with kernel oc to higher clock speed! so OMAP is powerful than Exynos
My I9100G scored 4171

The picture redirects to another picture. If you want to do sth, do it correctly... ffs What's the number? I've scored 4004 on stock i9100...

update already.. sorry for the mistake image link.. i score at 4171 at stock i9100G!

updated already.. sorry for the mistaked image link.. i score at 4171 at stock i9100G!

Quadrant score means nothing. It means less then incorrectly posted pic and double posts.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

MS. said:
Quadrant score means nothing. It means less then incorrectly posted pic and double posts.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, that is cause i am not familiar to make posting... i can swear that is 100% real! Or you not satisfied that your i9100 lose? i can make a video if you want to see...

well my i9100 is cleverer than you. i think you didn't get it. quadrant sucks and nobody cares about quadrant scores.

rauschkugl said:
well my i9100 is cleverer than you. i think you didn't get it. quadrant sucks and nobody cares about quadrant scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you saying stupid? then you how to measure the performance on one phone... you think u is god can measure yourself? Please be manner while using your word.. TQ

well then don't spam the forum with stupid threads. quadrant wasn't updated for ages, it's not meant for testing dualcore chips and you always get completely different scores when running it different times. only noobs care about quadrant scores.

All stock so you are noob?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk

donmarkon said:
All stock so you are noob?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
your one already modded bro... see your battery icon also know... =.=

Can I be noob too?

rauschkugl said:
well then don't spam the forum with stupid threads. quadrant wasn't updated for ages, it's not meant for testing dualcore chips and you always get completely different scores when running it different times. only noobs care about quadrant scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, i know that is different score on Quadrant... but let say why old Android phone like one year ago Xperia x10 always got lower score than samsung s2? tat y in fact samsung S2 is powerful than before phone... If you think this is Stupid thread, why not you just ignore and keep your mouth shut.. and please be manner while using word... what the religion you have? so rude are you!

TheSaw said:
Can I be noob too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you hiding a meaning behind?

i was able to score more than 4000 points with my old hd2. and the builds in that time weren't even running stable. so my old hd2 is as good as your s2?

rauschkugl said:
i was able to score more than 4000 points with my old hd2. and the builds in that time weren't even running stable. so my old hd2 is as good as your s2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, please provide your Evidence brother thank you because be manner

these were the first builds that were running from sd card. i don't have these versions anymore because they were not stable and lot of things didn't work and i don't have my hd2 anymore. this should just show you that quadrant isn't reliable. the gpu isn't tested at all.
and who the hell does care about stock settings on xda? nobody here has a stock phone. antutu or smartbench if you care about numbers. they're at least able to test dualcore cpus. but a higher score still doesn't mean that your phone is better.

rauschkugl said:
these were the first builds that were running from sd card. i don't have these versions anymore because they were not stable and lot of things didn't work and i don't have my hd2 anymore. this should just show you that quadrant isn't reliable. the gpu isn't tested at all.
and who the hell does care about stock settings on xda? nobody here has a stock phone. antutu or smartbench if you care about numbers. they're at least able to test dualcore cpus. but a higher score still doesn't mean that your phone is better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
okok. Bro.. so, do you plan to move to Galaxy Note? or waiting New Galaxy S3?

serge327 said:
No, that is cause i am not familiar to make posting... i can swear that is 100% real! Or you not satisfied that your i9100 lose? i can make a video if you want to see...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hope your happy with your dev community
Sent from my GT-I9100

serge327 said:
Stock I9100G Quadrant Scored beat stock I9100's Score! i think it will get more score than mod i9100 once have mod with kernel oc to higher clock speed! so OMAP is powerful than Exynos
My I9100G scored 4171
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
first of all, you are using a wrong benchmark to test. secondly, you are not comparing apple to apple. what i meant was your G version is most likely running on update3 source code. when i flash a kernel with update3 source code, my stock rom is able to hit more than 4300+

Quadrant Score

Hi Everybody,
Anybody here has achieved above 5500 results in Quadrant Score?
If have, can you please state the ROM / Kernel / MOD combinations.
Thank You

kamalsutra said:
Hi Everybody,
Anybody here has achieved above 5500 results in Quadrant Score?
If have, can you please state the ROM / Kernel / MOD combinations.
Thank You
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, my device just scored 6187. Stock LH3, stock kernel LH3, rooted. No other mods.

Note that all 3 quadrant apps from standard to professional will give you different median scores ranging from 5200 on standard to 6300 on professional version.
This makes this app useless crap and explains a lot about some users complaining and others being perfectly happy with their scores.
Waiting for JKay mod on GT-I9300

My score is varied. Ranging from 5000-6000+, dependent on the temperature of phone. To get higher score, you have to wait until your phone cool down. I got around 6000 with Siyah kernel 1.7, AOKP or Ultima Rom, OC to 1.6 Ghz, UV -100Mhz and GPU overclocking as well. With that configuration, I had 13500+ score or antutu benchmark.

I believe that even though there's variant in the score, it does give a ballpark figure of your device capabilities especially if the scores tabulated comes from a significant number of devices of the same make and model. So, as a scientific question I think it is legitimate to ask. You can't compare this to a matter of preference to which act in X-factor that's just insulting.
You don't need to give opinions if they're not constructive.

Because this has been answered multiple times, it has been explained why it is useless multiple times and yet users continue to ask about it multiple times. Search Button, please use it

DramatikBeats said:
Because this has been answered multiple times, it has been explained why it is useless multiple times and yet users continue to ask about it multiple times. Search Button, please use it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe useless for some and useful for others m8.

JJEgan said:
No why are you supporting the posting of multiple identical questions day after day .
Oh Goody Goody Mr Bumper yet another Quadrant post .
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1935269
jje
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You could also just answer the question so the thread dies in a peaceful way, or you could just not reply. Better than being so hostile.

Can any one post the score of i9350 ???
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium

Please see here.

Overclocking snapdragon 800.

So I was wondering about the truth behind the risks of frying your cpu through overclocking or the chip itself degrading faster over time, and if there are such risks do they apply to a simple 2.5 ghz overclocking ?

There isn't any risk like that, unless you are using extremely high voltage, or are at terribly hot place.
I have tested all the overclockable kernels, and haven't found a single one which is steady at 2.6 or 2.8 GHz. Only Faux's kernel at 2490 MHz is stable.
Don't be scared, there's no risk.
PS: I personally use Performance governor by the way, so the CPU is always at max frequency, against all advice I keep using that for past three years, never had a problem, and you can understand where I live the temperature reaches extremely high in summer, so...

devilsdouble said:
There isn't any risk like that, unless you are using extremely high voltage, or are at terribly hot place.
I have tested all the overclockable kernels, and haven't found a single one which is steady at 2.6 or 2.8 GHz. Only Faux's kernel at 2490 MHz is stable.
Don't be scared, there's no risk.
PS: I personally use Performance governor by the way, so the CPU is always at max frequency, against all advice I keep using that for past three years, never had a problem, and you can understand where I live the temperature reaches extremely high in summer, so...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's actually comforting I too am using fauxclock and I live in Egypt so the temperature gets pretty high here, but I'm constantly monitoring the cpu's temperature so I will give the 2.5 ghz overclock a try for a while and see how it goes.

MohamedOMostafa said:
That's actually comforting I too am using fauxclock and I live in Egypt so the temperature gets pretty high here, but I'm constantly monitoring the cpu's temperature so I will give the 2.5 ghz overclock a try for a while and see how it goes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah do that. Just to see if the OC is stable run that damn Antutu benchmark. If the device doesn't reboot/stuck then OC is stable
Best of luck.

devilsdouble said:
Yeah do that. Just to see if the OC is stable run that damn Antutu benchmark. If the device doesn't reboot/stuck then OC is stable
Best of luck.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the first thing I did actually

MohamedOMostafa said:
That's the first thing I did actually
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha ha. Good. That's on Faux right? I got almost same score (44.7k) when I was checking.
Now if you want more then flash one of those 2.6 or 2.8 GHz kernels, and do the test, and message me if Antutu finishes the benchmark even once

devilsdouble said:
Ha ha. Good. That's on Faux right? I got almost same score (44.7k) when I was checking.
Now if you want more then flash one of those 2.6 or 2.8 GHz kernels, and do the test, and message me if Antutu finishes the benchmark even once
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
will do.

If you want higher you should try out Ultimate Kernel. Although it is removed from XDA, you can still find it on some foreign language site. It's the highest and most stable OC kernel I have used (3.0GHz).

Graffiti Exploit said:
If you want higher you should try out Ultimate Kernel. Although it is removed from XDA, you can still find it on some foreign language site. It's the highest and most stable OC kernel I have used (3.0GHz).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3.0 GHz
any benchmark screenshots ??

Graffiti Exploit said:
If you want higher you should try out Ultimate Kernel. Although it is removed from XDA, you can still find it on some foreign language site. It's the highest and most stable OC kernel I have used (3.0GHz).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, just found the topic, and it's mentioned that the topic was close due to non-compliance with the GNU GPLv2 and XDA forum rules, now what's the former thing?
Anyone has the latest version, if it's still updated outside XDA? Want to try it.

djak272 said:
3.0 GHz
any benchmark screenshots ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry cleaned up my screenshots folder as it was taking up a lot of space. Besides Antutu has been constantly getting updates so it may not be accurate.
devilsdouble said:
Hmm, just found the topic, and it's mentioned that the topic was close due to non-compliance with the GNU GPLv2 and XDA forum rules, now what's the former thing?
Anyone has the latest version, if it's still updated outside XDA? Want to try it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know if this is allowed but here it is.
v72
http://www.android-hilfe.de/custom-...ernel-kitkat-tw-only-ultimate-kernel-v72.html
v73
https://www.androidsource.club/foru...kernel-ultimate-kernel-v73-galaxy-note-3.html
Last one I used was v63. So do test it out more because I cannot vouch for the updates. But based from experience, I have never gotten an unstable update from that kernel.

Graffiti Exploit said:
Sorry cleaned up my screenshots folder as it was taking up a lot of space. Besides Antutu has been constantly getting updates so it may not be accurate.
I don't know if this is allowed but here it is.
v72
http://www.android-hilfe.de/custom-...ernel-kitkat-tw-only-ultimate-kernel-v72.html
v73
https://www.androidsource.club/foru...kernel-ultimate-kernel-v73-galaxy-note-3.html
Last one I used was v63. So do test it out more because I cannot vouch for the updates. But based from experience, I have never gotten an unstable update from that kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot for the link mate. Downloaded and flashed v73, but I can't get it past the stock clock rate of 2265 MHz! I mean I have tried to set higher frequency than that in S Tweaks, even downloaded Trickstar, SetCPU, but the it'd just stuck at 2265 MHz! I can go lower than 2265 but not higher! Weird!

devilsdouble said:
Thanks a lot for the link mate. Downloaded and flashed v73, but I can't get it past the stock clock rate of 2265 MHz! I mean I have tried to set higher frequency than that in S Tweaks, even downloaded Trickstar, SetCPU, but the it'd just stuck at 2265 MHz! I can go lower than 2265 but not higher! Weird!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it comes with 2 apps for customization. You apply frequency on the first one and open the other and select apply changes. I'm not sure if it was this kernel or was it AEL. Lol. Anyways good luck. Maybe your ROM doesn't support a certain "stuff". I'm sorry but I really forgot about those terminologies. You can read up on the closed thread if you want. I'm sure you'll have a clue or on that link I gave you. *Google Translate ftw*

Snapdragon 801 ac at par of Snapdragon 808

Without any doubt we could say that the snpadragon 800 and 801 is perhaps the best processor or one of the best manufactured by Qualcomm ... as you see this at the height of the snapdragon 808, do not take much, what do you think? a greeting
Sony xperia z3
60000 points in antutu 6, LG g4 63000 points and Xiaomi mi4s 57000...
I cant post images now

Sorry, i duplicate my user with tapatalk...
Here the images

Not sure how you manage to get 60000 there.
Yes, on KK was <50000, on LL/MM was about 50000, and on NougatPreview4 saw it even 52000, but your number is way out there.
Can you show us a PCMark Work 2.0 result and a 3DMark ES 3.0 result too?

Licaon_Kter said:
Not sure how you manage to get 60000 there.
Yes, on KK was <50000, on LL/MM was about 50000, and on NougatPreview4 saw it even 52000, but your number is way out there.
Can you show us a PCMark Work 2.0 result and a 3DMark ES 3.0 result too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi friend, im in stock marshmallow 6.0.1

kevin233333 said:
Hi friend, im in stock marshmallow 6.0.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes friend, that's great for you, we need more proof though.

I got 64000 on ExistenZ rom and Elite kernel. (without OC)
Don't know if 801 is better than 808 (I don't think it's more powerful, differences may be related to software, screen resolution...) but it has more than enough power and is really trustworthy. I haven't see many problems on this chips on any phone.

i also got 60-62 on marshmallow with my z3 stock android ill be uploading a vid on youtube,

ayocuan said:
i also got 60-62 on marshmallow with my z3 stock android ill be uploading a vid on youtube,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again, that's nice, but, if a higher (than usual) score is seen only in one particular app, it sounds like an error, that's why I was asking for another test in another app (PCMark, GeekBench, Basemark, whatever), that will show a higher score too, hence proving that the device (or Android version) is indeed faster.

Licaon_Kter said:
Again, that's nice, but, if a higher (than usual) score is seen only in one particular app, it sounds like an error, that's why I was asking for another test in another app (PCMark, GeekBench, Basemark, whatever), that will show a higher score too, hence proving that the device (or Android version) is indeed faster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i did geekbench4 and got 987 single/ 2697 multi

I was going to post some numbers, but...
* last week AnTuTu 6.2.7: 52912
* today AnTuTu 6.2.7: 58133
Yes, looks like all those that point out that this app is flawed were right all along, hence my skepticism in the above posts.
That being said, other apps are more consistent:
* GeekBench 4: ~1000/~2600 (yeah there's a slight variation per run but it's <3%!)
* 3DMark: ~1100 (again, slight variations)

Just to confirm,
See attached screenshot.
Z3 running stock 6.0.1

mcraeally44 said:
Just to confirm,
See attached screenshot.
Z3 running stock 6.0.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice, does 3DMark confirm this greater than average performance? Eg. You have 1500 points or something.

Antutu Benchmark z3-ExistenZ 5.6.5
Antutu Benchmark-z3 d6603 with ExistenZ Rom from today

Weky2306 said:
Antutu Benchmark-z3 d6603 with ExistenZ Rom from today
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And a 3DMark for confirmation please. Thanks

Licaon_Kter said:
And a 3DMark for confirmation please. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Weky2306 said:
3DMark: 1215
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, as expected, similar score.
That's the problem with AnTuTu, while your score there is way over Z3 average (your 65000 vs 52000 or 58000 that I and others get), your 3DMark is at the Z3 average. :-\
If you find time try a GeekBench too. Thanks.

Licaon_Kter said:
Yeah, as expected, similar score.
That's the problem with AnTuTu, while your score there is way over Z3 average (your 65000 vs 52000 or 58000 that I and others get), your 3DMark is at the Z3 average. :-\
If you find time try a GeekBench too. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
---------- Post added at 06:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:26 PM ----------
Weky2306 said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It looks like only Antutu is different like you said

Weky2306 said:
It looks like only Antutu is different like you said
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep and when a new product advertises an AnTuTu score first I get the "they try to hide something vibe".
Don't get me wrong, I like big scores, I want users to share their setup that helped them, but usually I see some test somewhere (say, new device), so I go and try to compare it to my own, and "hey, surprise", most of the time benches on my device in hand will have a lower score than the same device from their test, so what does that leave me with?
My device was scoring 49000 on KK, then 52000 on LL, now it's 53000 or 58000 on NDP4, what does that tell me? Nothing much about my device.
Now, going to PCMark (general performance), 3DMark (GPU), GeekBench (CPU) gives you a better image of the device.
This whole thread can now be shorten to: "OMFG huge score in AnTuTu that does not reflect any performance improvement in any other benches, yay"

overclocking, modifying the kernel

I want to learn how I can modify kernel to adjust clock speeds. wt88047 redmi 2 . If anyone can detail the steps it would be great
Thank you

jsidney96 said:
I want to learn how I can modify kernel to adjust clock speeds. wt88047 redmi 2 . If anyone can detail the steps it would be great
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overclock dont work on redmi 2, all overclocks are fake

NaassomDourado said:
Overclock dont work on redmi 2, all overclocks are fake
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, except GPU overclock by me and Ashish94, the true 620mhz and the TurboClock 465T increase ~35% the gaming performance, games like asphalt 8 will run at 8 or 9 fps higher with the Overclock

TecnoTailsPlays said:
Yep, except GPU overclock by me and Ashish94, the true 620mhz and the TurboClock 465T increase ~35% the gaming performance, games like asphalt 8 will run at 8 or 9 fps higher with the Overclock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can select upto 1.8ghz on the zetsubo kernel , thats fake??

It feels smoother once overclocked.........

jsidney96 said:
You can select upto 1.8ghz on the zetsubo kernel , thats fake??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fake

TecnoTailsPlays said:
Fake
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont believe it, atleast tell me the fake steps
Those kernels heats up and locks up if i set too high cpu clk..... I know it can be overclocked..

jsidney96 said:
I want to learn how I can modify kernel to adjust clock speeds. wt88047 redmi 2 . If anyone can detail the steps it would be great
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i'd suggest you to try lateautumn kernel, it boosts your CPU freq to 1.8ghz and it seems like it worked for me, battery drained so fast tho...

rufuskid said:
i'd suggest you to try lateautumn kernel, it boosts your CPU freq to 1.8ghz and it seems like it worked for me, battery drained so fast tho...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I want to learn how to do it....

jsidney96 said:
I dont believe it, atleast tell me the fake steps
Those kernels heats up and locks up if i set too high cpu clk..... I know it can be overclocked..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look, I'm tired from explaining that CPU overcloks are fake, just freaking search about snapdragon 410, the processor is LOCKED, PLL overclock is not possible without external source file help, only Moto g3 osprey have this file, when somebody port's that file to our source, I will be wrong
Also if you don't even know how to overclock a device, how can you say that I'm wrong?

jsidney96 said:
I want to learn how to do it....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
download kernel adiutor and you will have the option there (with the custom kernel applied)

TecnoTailsPlays said:
Look, I'm tired from explaining that CPU overcloks are fake, just freaking search about snapdragon 410, the processor is LOCKED, PLL overclock is not possible without external source file help, only Moto g3 osprey have this file, when somebody port's that file to our source, I will be wrong
Also if you don't even know how to overclock a device, how can you say that I'm wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am sorry . Its just i couldnt believe it .... I will try to do something useful

jsidney96 said:
I am sorry . Its just i couldnt believe it .... I will try to do something useful
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Something useful? Why don't you try arm64 aosp caf by pirej and see how the rom is? we need more people to log some bugs like wifi 10m off, etc

TecnoTailsPlays said:
Something useful? Why don't you try arm64 aosp caf by pirej and see how the rom is? we need more people to log some bugs like wifi 10m off, etc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
saw this.....
https://forum.xda-developers.com/redmi-2/help/compiling-kernel-development-overclock-t3538273
I am having exams now..... i will jumb right back in once exams are over..... i am already running pirej's rom on 2014818....
i am still learning

jsidney96 said:
saw this.....
https://forum.xda-developers.com/redmi-2/help/compiling-kernel-development-overclock-t3538273
I am having exams now..... i will jumb right back in once exams are over..... i am already running pirej's rom on 2014818....
i am still learning
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At that time I din't know anything about this phone, becouse I just had buyed it, then I started spending 8hrs in the computer to study kernels, redmi 2, and all related to source, android, etc. Then I started making overclocks, and after 2 weeks of testing I completed my results and overclock was fake.
It's like school or college, you need to study to understand

Which ROM is best to be used with late autumn kernel. When I install late autumn kernel on any ROM ,the camera stops working.

LuanHalaiko said:
Look, I'm tired from explaining that CPU overcloks are fake, just freaking search about snapdragon 410, the processor is LOCKED, PLL overclock is not possible without external source file help, only Moto g3 osprey have this file, when somebody port's that file to our source, I will be wrong
Also if you don't even know how to overclock a device, how can you say that I'm wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds like a stage I'm currently going through, are there any recommended resources for learning?
The main direction is to reverse the kernel code for the purpose of changing system settings