Hi Everybody,
Anybody here has achieved above 5500 results in Quadrant Score?
If have, can you please state the ROM / Kernel / MOD combinations.
Thank You
kamalsutra said:
Hi Everybody,
Anybody here has achieved above 5500 results in Quadrant Score?
If have, can you please state the ROM / Kernel / MOD combinations.
Thank You
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, my device just scored 6187. Stock LH3, stock kernel LH3, rooted. No other mods.
Note that all 3 quadrant apps from standard to professional will give you different median scores ranging from 5200 on standard to 6300 on professional version.
This makes this app useless crap and explains a lot about some users complaining and others being perfectly happy with their scores.
Waiting for JKay mod on GT-I9300
My score is varied. Ranging from 5000-6000+, dependent on the temperature of phone. To get higher score, you have to wait until your phone cool down. I got around 6000 with Siyah kernel 1.7, AOKP or Ultima Rom, OC to 1.6 Ghz, UV -100Mhz and GPU overclocking as well. With that configuration, I had 13500+ score or antutu benchmark.
I believe that even though there's variant in the score, it does give a ballpark figure of your device capabilities especially if the scores tabulated comes from a significant number of devices of the same make and model. So, as a scientific question I think it is legitimate to ask. You can't compare this to a matter of preference to which act in X-factor that's just insulting.
You don't need to give opinions if they're not constructive.
Because this has been answered multiple times, it has been explained why it is useless multiple times and yet users continue to ask about it multiple times. Search Button, please use it
DramatikBeats said:
Because this has been answered multiple times, it has been explained why it is useless multiple times and yet users continue to ask about it multiple times. Search Button, please use it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe useless for some and useful for others m8.
JJEgan said:
No why are you supporting the posting of multiple identical questions day after day .
Oh Goody Goody Mr Bumper yet another Quadrant post .
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1935269
jje
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You could also just answer the question so the thread dies in a peaceful way, or you could just not reply. Better than being so hostile.
Can any one post the score of i9350 ???
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Please see here.
Related
Hey everyone!
I was wondering...
So far, the HD2 in Android is able to run at a maximum of 1190Mhz. Is there a way to remove this limit and allow Android to increase the CPU clock frequency?
It'd be awesome to see what the Quadrant score would be if speeds of 1.3Ghz were used And Android would be blazing fast
Bump....isn't anyone as interested as I am?
No, in order to reach a higher clock speed the Kernal would have to be modified. But even then many other variables will also need to be considered. Vcore will need to be adjusted, and since at 1.2GHz it's already been increased they would have to increase it further in order not to hit a ceiling causing the CPU to become unstable under load.
Modifying code will also mean that other parts of the Kernal or OS might not play well together. Bugs can be created and would need to be fixed.
Sometimes even doing this will reduce performance rather than increasing. There is a reason why they havn't gone above that speed for now or ever.
Have a great day sir.
frankly saying just don't see the point of doing that. personally i wouldn't want my HD2 to smell like burnt chicken
Elemental_Fire said:
Bump....isn't anyone as interested as I am?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Benchmark scores are ultimately pointless, unless all you want to do with your phone is have willy-waving competitions with other HD2 owners.
"My build get's 3 more points in Linpack than you" big fat hairy deal.
It makes no difference, the only thing that matters is whether your build is fast enough, stable enough, and that you are happy with it. Why melt your phone just to say you've got the highest score in a completely arbitrary set of tests?
Reno_79 said:
Benchmark scores are ultimately pointless, unless all you want to do with your phone is have willy-waving competitions with other HD2 owners.
"My build get's 3 more points in Linpack than you" big fat hairy deal.
It makes no difference, the only thing that matters is whether your build is fast enough, stable enough, and that you are happy with it. Why melt your phone just to say you've got the highest score in a completely arbitrary set of tests?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL XD that was pretty funny.
Reno_79 said:
Benchmark scores are ultimately pointless, unless all you want to do with your phone is have willy-waving competitions with other HD2 owners.
"My build get's 3 more points in Linpack than you" big fat hairy deal.
It makes no difference, the only thing that matters is whether your build is fast enough, stable enough, and that you are happy with it. Why melt your phone just to say you've got the highest score in a completely arbitrary set of tests?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*Linpack score of 7*
Time to pop the blue chip
Elemental_Fire said:
Hey everyone!
I was wondering...
So far, the HD2 in Android is able to run at a maximum of 1190Mhz. Is there a way to remove this limit and allow Android to increase the CPU clock frequency?
It'd be awesome to see what the Quadrant score would be if speeds of 1.3Ghz were used And Android would be blazing fast
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Search my kernel thread. I posted benchmarks at 1.3Ghz. There is really little point to it. I am back running at 1Ghz again.
Sent from my HTC HD2
my leo only goes until 998mhz.. does anyone know why?
hastarin said:
Search my kernel thread. I posted benchmarks at 1.3Ghz. There is really little point to it. I am back running at 1Ghz again.
Sent from my HTC HD2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can validate this. I have been using many different kernels and for my money Hastarin's r8 (maximum cpu speed 998mhz) runs the smoothest and most stable, while giving me 6ma in standby (with 3G on).
Overclocked at 1.9ghz I saw some minor speed improvements but not really all that much and the battery drain was horrendous. Clock speed is overrated, there isn't really anything available on Android that requires more than 1ghz anyways. I have been playing IQ and Final Fantasy 8 with my wii remote on my current CM6 ROM with Hastarin's kernel and everything is smooth as butter.
Benchmark scores are useful to compare kernels and cpu governors, and I really only use Quadrant to look for big changes (+/- 200 points or more). I just updated from an Elbartome kernel to Hastarin r8 and saw an immediate 200 point Quadrant boost using an interactive governor at 1ghz and bettery battery drain.
The real differences are in the kernel, not the clock speed and as kernels get more and more efficient, you will see higher benchmarks from the same clock speed.
Remember that first Cotulla ROM we got on our HD2s in the very beginning? That was 1ghz and it ran like crap (actually amazing for a first ever port) compared to what we have now.
gianmich said:
my leo only goes until 998mhz.. does anyone know why?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again, it's the kernel you are using.
Has nothing to do with the phone, WinMo ROM, or Radio or anything.
All the ROMs in the dev section tell you which kernel they use. If they use Hastarin kernel you will not be able to OC it, I think everyone else uses an OC to 1190mhz kernel, so using their ROM or their kernel will give you the higher clock speed.
Why you guyz give this type of answer he didn t ask if you were agree to overclok just if it would be possible to overclock more that 1190 stop stupid answers we dont give a sh** if you think overclocking is useless just dont reply....
To answer: i ve see dev hd2 running 1323mhz but wasn t stable enough. Impossible to released the kernel as the increase of Vcore was causing excessive hotness and autoshutdown
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
asphaltkiller said:
Why you guyz give this type of answer he didn t ask if you were agree to overclok just if it would be possible to overclock more that 1190 stop stupid answers we dont give a sh** if you think overclocking is useless just dont reply....
To answer: i ve see dev hd2 running 1323mhz but wasn t stable enough. Impossible to released the kernel as the increase of Vcore was causing excessive hotness and autoshutdown
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pull your head in.
The OP asked a question and I answered it. I have run at 1.3 just fine but have chosen not to do so. Not everyone could of course. I have been lucky with my phone.
If you don't like my answer you're free to ignore it but there is no need for posts like yours.
Sent from my HTC HD2
seems to me the ultimate kernel would be the r8 with undervolt under 1000 , and overvolt above 1000 to maintain sability .. i dun care about battery , i carry 2 with me
who on earth are you to tell others how to reply. the last time i checked your name was not in the list of moderators.
asphaltkiller said:
Why you guyz give this type of answer he didn t ask if you were agree to overclok just if it would be possible to overclock more that 1190 stop stupid answers we dont give a sh** if you think overclocking is useless just dont reply....
To answer: i ve see dev hd2 running 1323mhz but wasn t stable enough. Impossible to released the kernel as the increase of Vcore was causing excessive hotness and autoshutdown
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
asphaltkiller said:
Why you guyz give this type of answer he didn t ask if you were agree to overclok just if it would be possible to overclock more that 1190 stop stupid answers we dont give a sh** if you think overclocking is useless just dont reply....
To answer: i ve see dev hd2 running 1323mhz but wasn t stable enough. Impossible to released the kernel as the increase of Vcore was causing excessive hotness and autoshutdown
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you happen to notice that out of every reply to this thread, yours was the least coherent and offered the least amount of useful information?
The one nugget of information you tried to give wasn't even accurate. It IS possible to release a 1.3ghz kernel, but one has not been publicly released because, as hastarin pointed out, it doesn't really improve performance.
hastarin is a kernel developer, he knows more about this stuff than any of us and I am sure the OP could use the information provided by him and all of us who actually use different kernels and either OC or don't.
Thanks everyone. While it is true that all I wanted to know was if it was possible, a little exra knowledge can't hurt anyone Hastarin, I use your kernel, and admit it's amazing! Guess I don't really need 1.3Ghz as long as the device runs smooth, right? Quadrant speeds aren't totally relevant but I like to show off sometimes, like we all do
so hastarin's kernel allow speed up to 998 mhz?
With respect, this guys post isn't the most coherant but he is French so let's not be too judgemental.
He's also got a point. He's not meaning everyone, especially not hastarin, but posts #4, 5, 6 and 7 are pointless, uninformative and even wrong.
I'm not a big one for philosophy but Plato said "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something". People should just stick to posting in threads that they can usefully contribute to.
I hope this post contributes in the way of reminding people that the post counter is not a measure of intelligence, experience or forum standing.
asphaltkiller said:
Why you guyz give this type of answer he didn t ask if you were agree to overclok just if it would be possible to overclock more that 1190 stop stupid answers we dont give a sh** if you think overclocking is useless just dont reply....
To answer: i ve see dev hd2 running 1323mhz but wasn t stable enough. Impossible to released the kernel as the increase of Vcore was causing excessive hotness and autoshutdown
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol yeah, he was helping out...which he did Anyways enough of the flaming lol!
Hastarin, could you inbox me? Need to talk
Elemental_Fire said:
Lol yeah, he was helping out...which he did Anyways enough of the flaming lol!
Hastarin, could you inbox me? Need to talk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Feel free to send me a PM but I am about to head out for most of the day so don't expect a prompt reply.
Sent from my HTC HD2
I'm just wondering what people are getting for quadrant scores with the voodoo enabled and without. I just did one and got the following running darky's 7.7.
Voodoo Enabled: 1623
Without = 1200~
With = 1500~
I don't understand why you people keep making new topics related to Darky's ROM instead of just posting it in the actual ROM thread.
Because his rom thread is meant for the dev's and bug discoveries not the million thanks replies....and why do you people always have to comment negatively on other people's posts, just read and move along.....
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
By the way, why do you care about the Quadrant scores? If anything, you are clearly asking for the phone to be optimised for Quadrant, rather than actual performance..
My STRONG advise is to NEVER touch a benchmark and judge it on how you think it feels, because otherwise you will never be happy.
Auzy said:
My STRONG advise is to NEVER touch a benchmark and judge it on how you think it feels, because otherwise you will never be happy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This. If the phone feels sluggish, by all means complain and state it. I wouldn't base my opinion of the speed of a phone solely on a benchmark.
My SGS2 perform really fast
That's pretty zippy! What kernel and ROM are you using?
I got 7000 once, but usually I get around 6500 with Siyah (which is super awesome) and CM7 (which is also amazing).
Congratulations, feel free to collect your prize.
Seriously what are the point of these threads, many people can achieve this Quadrant score if they overclock to 1600+ with a specified kernel, Quadrant scores are about as much use as ripped condom
jonny68 said:
Seriously what are the point of these threads, many people can achieve this Quadrant score if they overclock to 1600+ with a specified kernel, Quadrant scores are about as much use as ripped condom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought you said rippled
OP
Quadrant is not a true representation of device and can be cheated very easily....
There are many threads you could have contributed to on this subject instead of starting new..
On that note thread closed.
Stock I9100G Quadrant Scored beat stock I9100's Score! i think it will get more score than mod i9100 once have mod with kernel oc to higher clock speed! so OMAP is powerful than Exynos
My I9100G scored 4171
The picture redirects to another picture. If you want to do sth, do it correctly... ffs What's the number? I've scored 4004 on stock i9100...
update already.. sorry for the mistake image link.. i score at 4171 at stock i9100G!
updated already.. sorry for the mistaked image link.. i score at 4171 at stock i9100G!
Quadrant score means nothing. It means less then incorrectly posted pic and double posts.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
MS. said:
Quadrant score means nothing. It means less then incorrectly posted pic and double posts.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, that is cause i am not familiar to make posting... i can swear that is 100% real! Or you not satisfied that your i9100 lose? i can make a video if you want to see...
well my i9100 is cleverer than you. i think you didn't get it. quadrant sucks and nobody cares about quadrant scores.
rauschkugl said:
well my i9100 is cleverer than you. i think you didn't get it. quadrant sucks and nobody cares about quadrant scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you saying stupid? then you how to measure the performance on one phone... you think u is god can measure yourself? Please be manner while using your word.. TQ
well then don't spam the forum with stupid threads. quadrant wasn't updated for ages, it's not meant for testing dualcore chips and you always get completely different scores when running it different times. only noobs care about quadrant scores.
All stock so you are noob?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
donmarkon said:
All stock so you are noob?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
your one already modded bro... see your battery icon also know... =.=
Can I be noob too?
rauschkugl said:
well then don't spam the forum with stupid threads. quadrant wasn't updated for ages, it's not meant for testing dualcore chips and you always get completely different scores when running it different times. only noobs care about quadrant scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, i know that is different score on Quadrant... but let say why old Android phone like one year ago Xperia x10 always got lower score than samsung s2? tat y in fact samsung S2 is powerful than before phone... If you think this is Stupid thread, why not you just ignore and keep your mouth shut.. and please be manner while using word... what the religion you have? so rude are you!
TheSaw said:
Can I be noob too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you hiding a meaning behind?
i was able to score more than 4000 points with my old hd2. and the builds in that time weren't even running stable. so my old hd2 is as good as your s2?
rauschkugl said:
i was able to score more than 4000 points with my old hd2. and the builds in that time weren't even running stable. so my old hd2 is as good as your s2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, please provide your Evidence brother thank you because be manner
these were the first builds that were running from sd card. i don't have these versions anymore because they were not stable and lot of things didn't work and i don't have my hd2 anymore. this should just show you that quadrant isn't reliable. the gpu isn't tested at all.
and who the hell does care about stock settings on xda? nobody here has a stock phone. antutu or smartbench if you care about numbers. they're at least able to test dualcore cpus. but a higher score still doesn't mean that your phone is better.
rauschkugl said:
these were the first builds that were running from sd card. i don't have these versions anymore because they were not stable and lot of things didn't work and i don't have my hd2 anymore. this should just show you that quadrant isn't reliable. the gpu isn't tested at all.
and who the hell does care about stock settings on xda? nobody here has a stock phone. antutu or smartbench if you care about numbers. they're at least able to test dualcore cpus. but a higher score still doesn't mean that your phone is better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
okok. Bro.. so, do you plan to move to Galaxy Note? or waiting New Galaxy S3?
serge327 said:
No, that is cause i am not familiar to make posting... i can swear that is 100% real! Or you not satisfied that your i9100 lose? i can make a video if you want to see...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hope your happy with your dev community
Sent from my GT-I9100
serge327 said:
Stock I9100G Quadrant Scored beat stock I9100's Score! i think it will get more score than mod i9100 once have mod with kernel oc to higher clock speed! so OMAP is powerful than Exynos
My I9100G scored 4171
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
first of all, you are using a wrong benchmark to test. secondly, you are not comparing apple to apple. what i meant was your G version is most likely running on update3 source code. when i flash a kernel with update3 source code, my stock rom is able to hit more than 4300+
Hey guys,
I'm creating this thread to gather the quadrant results from everyone so we can see which ROMs perform better and which worse.
I'll start by giving mine
ROM: HyperNote 0.4v
Result: 4890
So, what's yours?
Well that was low, im using stock rom and it gets 6000 ++
Stock ROM (rooted)
Sent from my GT-N7105
Stock LJA
Those benchmarks are really impressive.
Useless thread. Should be closed.
A quadrant score would never tell you which rom is better than another because the best is the one corresponding to your needs.
f.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
forelli said:
Useless thread. Should be closed.
A quadrant score would never tell you which rom is better than another because the best is the one corresponding to your needs.
f.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not true.
A rom/kernel combination could be seriously flawed that results in bad performance. The user might believe the device should perform like that, so these benchmarks give examples of what the Note 2 can achieve. Thread is valid.
Stock ALJ3.
theoneofgod said:
Not true.
A rom/kernel combination could be seriously flawed that results in bad performance. The user might believe the device should perform like that, so these benchmarks give examples of what the Note 2 can achieve. Thread is valid.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agree with you. As you see HyperNote is the slowest one hahaha. Later today I'll give Android Revolution HD a shot and we'll see how it perfoms compared to stock and HyperNote
Quadrant can be used to compare roms/kernels (see roughly how they perform), but not to compare minor tweaks done on the same rom because the results are inconsistent...
Stock rom.
Sent from Beauty & the Beast (GT-N7100)
theoneofgod said:
... Thread is valid.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thread is valid? Since when are you the forum Moderator?
Let's ask the Mods to see if the thread is valid or not. I remember in the Sensation forum such threads were forbidden and deleted.
f.
from the moderator
Quadrant is not a reliable way to gauge performance since there are way too many ways to "game" the test parameters
Linpack provides a little better results but still all testing is just a snapshot in time.
This thread will not enhance knowledge and will ultimately end up in a flame war..... sorry.....
THREAD CLOSED