Database Users

[Q] Quadrant Froyo.. Why is there a lower standard now??

I've been seeing alot of people make a big deal about quadrant scores that pass the 1000 mark...but not too long ago when 2.1 was around.. 2207 was my average score with all these lag fixes installed..
i know i must have missed a post about this.... but nowadays w/ voodoo... i'm lucky to get 1000.... what gives?

Do a search for the answer! people have gone over this countless times.

Lag fixes trick quadrant. It's not an accurate reflection of performance. Therefore over 1000 stock is an improvement from the 930 average score of previous stock builds.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

solidkundi said:
I've been seeing alot of people make a big deal about quadrant scores that pass the 1000 mark...but not too long ago when 2.1 was around.. 2207 was my average score with all these lag fixes installed..
i know i must have missed a post about this.... but nowadays w/ voodoo... i'm lucky to get 1000.... what gives?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because that benchmark is bunk.

Quadrant Scores with or without voodoo enabled running Darkyy's v7.7

I'm just wondering what people are getting for quadrant scores with the voodoo enabled and without. I just did one and got the following running darky's 7.7.
Voodoo Enabled: 1623

Without = 1200~
With = 1500~

I don't understand why you people keep making new topics related to Darky's ROM instead of just posting it in the actual ROM thread.

Because his rom thread is meant for the dev's and bug discoveries not the million thanks replies....and why do you people always have to comment negatively on other people's posts, just read and move along.....
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

By the way, why do you care about the Quadrant scores? If anything, you are clearly asking for the phone to be optimised for Quadrant, rather than actual performance..
My STRONG advise is to NEVER touch a benchmark and judge it on how you think it feels, because otherwise you will never be happy.

Auzy said:
My STRONG advise is to NEVER touch a benchmark and judge it on how you think it feels, because otherwise you will never be happy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This. If the phone feels sluggish, by all means complain and state it. I wouldn't base my opinion of the speed of a phone solely on a benchmark.

Accurate benchmarking.

Quadrant is very inaccurate the tests are not up to spec for testing +1Ghz devices accurately.
The reason i say this is due to the fact that the benchmark varies from test to test.
I suggest AnTutu Benchmark.
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.antutu.ABenchMark
It is much more accurate, as the the scores are closely similar time and time again.
The tests are a bit longer
But that is the good thing "accuracy"
It also gives info on each testing stage.
I got 2176 on WB's 007.1 TW rom, BB.67 with custom kernel.

OmegaRED^ said:
Quadrant is very inaccurate the tests are not up to spec for testing +1Ghz devices accurately.
The reason i say this is due to the fact that the benchmark varies from test to test.
I suggest AnTutu Benchmark.
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.antutu.ABenchMark
It is much more accurate, as the the scores are closely similar time and time again.
The tests are a bit longer
But that is the good thing "accuracy"
It also gives info on each testing stage.
I got 2176 on WB's 007.1 TW rom, BB.67 with custom kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good, will give it a try but it'd been better if you post this in themes & apps I guess
by the way what scores do you get with this rom in quadrant?

Chainfire released his new benchmarking tool yesterday, its called CF-Bench, search in the market

i've got 1973 on CM6 006 at 1.1Ghz

benchmarking
It does not matter what benchmarking utility you use. They all give you a general idea of the performance of your phone. I think the OP just wants to use the tool that gives him the score he wants to see.
In reality the score of any phone using any utility is always relative to the scores of other phones using the same utility.
The thing to focus on is not the actual figures you get back but how your device measures up to other phones using the same benchmark test.

kryptoner said:
Chainfire released his new benchmarking tool yesterday, its called CF-Bench, search in the market
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2232 hmm right behind the nexus s
Cm6 wb bb67 custom kernel z
Sent from my X10i using XDA App

Try smartbench 2011. That's the best one
Sent from my x10 on gingerbread

All benchmarking apps generaly suck. Its about how you feel using your phone. Not the numbers.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App

pepy_24 said:
All benchmarking apps generaly suck. Its about how you feel using your phone. Not the numbers.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But it's a good comparison between phones after having a average score for each phone. But like you say, the numbers don't mean anything. Everything is personal.

zodiac100 said:
It does not matter what benchmarking utility you use. They all give you a general idea of the performance of your phone. I think the OP just wants to use the tool that gives him the score he wants to see.
In reality the score of any phone using any utility is always relative to the scores of other phones using the same utility.
The thing to focus on is not the actual figures you get back but how your device measures up to other phones using the same benchmark test.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True about benchmark apps but I don't think I think the OP just wants to use the tool that gives him the score he wants to see. What the OP is saying that with this app the difference between each time's score is not much hence why calling it accurate.

To look for a good benchmark is more important if you use a new phone with dual core CPU cos the old benchmarks aren´t optimised for them. I read that CF-Bench is optimised for dual cores and stresses the CPU and not so much the GPU of the phone.
But interesting that it seems that the overclocking have such a huge influence. With the first run (Wolfbreaks CM6 TW007) i had 2800 points with 1152MHz and in the second run with 998MHz 2400 points.
But true....it´s more a interesting gadget than to take it too seriously

maddes1402 said:
To look for a good benchmark is more important if you use a new phone with dual core CPU cos the old benchmarks aren´t optimised for them. I read that CF-Bench is optimised for dual cores and stresses the CPU and not so much the GPU of the phone.
But interesting that it seems that the overclocking have such a huge influence. With the first run (Wolfbreaks CM6 TW007) i had 2800 points with 1152MHz and in the second run with 998MHz 2400 points.
But true....it´s more a interesting gadget than to take it too seriously
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It comes down to what you have happening in the background.
If your phone suddenly "for example" decides to fetch data off of 3G or suddenly refreshes the media midway thru the bench then it can effect your score. this is why it's best to do tests when the rom is clean and gone silent. "no background activity" with data disabled.
Benchmarking is used to place the current performance of a device in a certain category.
It's no different from benchmarking PC's.
A whole profession has been built around PC benchmarking with people competing for a first place.
If your score is higher than everyone else you win the competition.

i got 2232 on custom kernel at 1113 mhz processor
Sent from my X10 TripNMiUI-IRIS

CF-Bench
Smartbench 2011
Quadrant
Antutu Benchmark
what is the best now?

Wolfbreak said:
CF-Bench
Smartbench 2011
Quadrant
Antutu Benchmark
what is the best now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CF Bench (full version) has the most stable results, and IMO its the best out there.
Sent from my Sony Ericsson Xperia™ phone

Linpack is perfect

kantk20111 said:
Linpack is perfect
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Linpack only tests the cpu.
I haven't checked how CF bench works yet.
will report.

Wolfbreak said:
CF-Bench
Smartbench 2011
Quadrant
Antutu Benchmark
what is the best now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CF bench 101%

Wolfbreak said:
CF-Bench
Smartbench 2011
Quadrant
Antutu Benchmark
what is the best now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Chainfire one!
that thing is scale-able across cores (single/multi-cores) and fairly accurate

ROM with best Quadrant/Antutu performance?

What the title says.

This question gets asked over and over and over again. My answer....who cares. If you like what you are using, if its smooth and fast who cares right?
Sent from my HTC Vision using xda premium

I don't feel the need to explain how reliable (if at all) benchmarks are when it comes to measuring how fast a ROM performs.
So, to answer your question, my highest benchmarks were on ILWT and EliteMod, with both around 3,6-3,7K points on Antutu.

Spastic909 said:
This question gets asked over and over and over again. My answer....who cares. If you like what you are using, if its smooth and fast who cares right?
Sent from my HTC Vision using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apparently you don't care, but I do.
crestofawave said:
I don't feel the need to explain how reliable (if at all) benchmarks are when it comes to measuring how fast a ROM performs.
So, to answer your question, my highest benchmarks were on ILWT and EliteMod, with both around 3,6-3,7K points on Antutu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already have ILWT. What's EliteMod? Kernel?

EliteMod is a CM7 Variant and uses it's own "EliteKernel", much likes Tsubus' ILWT one. Both ROM's performances are similar and you really can't go wrong with either of them, if you want as much speed as possible.
Noted differences between EliteKernel and ILWT kernel is that EliteKernel has smartassV2 / scary governors (+ others I can't remember) and can also overclock higher than ILWT. Other than that, they don't have much differences (that you are actually going to notice in terms of speed, etc).

convolution said:
What the title says.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I scored 4832 in Antutu on one of the first ICS ROMs by xTazx, if I remember correctly it had a kernel by Flinny. It had insanely high 3D scores, close to 130fps in the thing with all the lights.

Rizo Zizo benchmarked many of the major ROMs in this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1376496
You'll see that a couple Sense 3 ROMs scored almost the same as ILWT, adding credence to the notion that benchmarks don't correlate to real world performance.

redpoint73 said:
Rizo Zizo benchmarked many of the major ROMs in this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1376496
You'll see that a couple Sense 3 ROMs scored almost the same as ILWT, adding credence to the notion that benchmarks don't correlate to real world performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1000 for having a clue

convolution said:
What the title says.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
antutu-5059
ILWT CM7
overclock CPU at 1,574GHz

redpoint73 said:
Rizo Zizo benchmarked many of the major ROMs in this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1376496
You'll see that a couple Sense 3 ROMs scored almost the same as ILWT, adding credence to the notion that benchmarks don't correlate to real world performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Guru Zeb said:
+1000 for having a clue
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree entirely. Benchmark scores don't mean anything. People need to understand the idea of a bottleneck, and the fact that in the Desire Z the CPU is not the bottleneck, it's the RAM. I OCed CPU to 1800MHz and GPU to 350MHz (>100MHz OC) and my benchmark scores were slightly higher, well over 5000 in AnTuTu, but guess what, real life performance was no different. Proof: the Desire S and HD have a very similar chipset (msm7x30) and the same C/GPU but guess why they're so much faster and better at multitasking and better to use in general than the Desire Z? Because they have 768MB of RAM and we don't!
Stop worrying about benchmarks, and download a couple of different ROMs, GB, ICS, jb, sense, and make your own mind up about which one you like best.

Quadrant Score

Hi Everybody,
Anybody here has achieved above 5500 results in Quadrant Score?
If have, can you please state the ROM / Kernel / MOD combinations.
Thank You

kamalsutra said:
Hi Everybody,
Anybody here has achieved above 5500 results in Quadrant Score?
If have, can you please state the ROM / Kernel / MOD combinations.
Thank You
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, my device just scored 6187. Stock LH3, stock kernel LH3, rooted. No other mods.

Note that all 3 quadrant apps from standard to professional will give you different median scores ranging from 5200 on standard to 6300 on professional version.
This makes this app useless crap and explains a lot about some users complaining and others being perfectly happy with their scores.
Waiting for JKay mod on GT-I9300

My score is varied. Ranging from 5000-6000+, dependent on the temperature of phone. To get higher score, you have to wait until your phone cool down. I got around 6000 with Siyah kernel 1.7, AOKP or Ultima Rom, OC to 1.6 Ghz, UV -100Mhz and GPU overclocking as well. With that configuration, I had 13500+ score or antutu benchmark.

I believe that even though there's variant in the score, it does give a ballpark figure of your device capabilities especially if the scores tabulated comes from a significant number of devices of the same make and model. So, as a scientific question I think it is legitimate to ask. You can't compare this to a matter of preference to which act in X-factor that's just insulting.
You don't need to give opinions if they're not constructive.

Because this has been answered multiple times, it has been explained why it is useless multiple times and yet users continue to ask about it multiple times. Search Button, please use it

DramatikBeats said:
Because this has been answered multiple times, it has been explained why it is useless multiple times and yet users continue to ask about it multiple times. Search Button, please use it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe useless for some and useful for others m8.

JJEgan said:
No why are you supporting the posting of multiple identical questions day after day .
Oh Goody Goody Mr Bumper yet another Quadrant post .
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1935269
jje
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You could also just answer the question so the thread dies in a peaceful way, or you could just not reply. Better than being so hostile.

Can any one post the score of i9350 ???
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium

Please see here.