Database Users

[IMAGES]Huawei U8800pro Hardware Configuration

Hi~~~~~~~~~~~ I am a Chinese guy, I bought the U8800 + a week ago.
I copy the hardware configuration image on quadrant advanced application ,share to you
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Quadrant Rank
and Huawei's chairman, said Chengdong.Yu speech:
Links:
weibo.com/1100856704/xpgu3tHpb
Some friends to see some old products U8800 can upgrade from 2.2 to 2.3 version of the expectations and concerns. Huawei Mobile R & D focus to a more leading ICS4.0 version up, with the fastest speed for the main products directly upgrade to 4.0, not 4.0 upgrade also try to upgrade to 2.3, unless some of the hardware capabilities are limited. Another, Vision Honor and other new models offer 2.3 version listed on the first, and then will be the fastest speed up the upgrade to version 4.0!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you believe that?OS v4.0???? Anyway, I do not believe that!
well........that is it.

benchmark AnTuTu

Trinity kernel,Bricked kernel,Cm10 kernel performance results!

I tried different kernels to test the performance of each.i used quadrant to test the performance.
* Stock CM10 kernel -3471
* Bricked kernel- 4171
* Trinity kernel - 3948
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

besides for quadrant being an outdated benchmark, you need to learn how to benchmark properly before anyone would consider your results valid. and quadrant would only show one narrow slice of of the whole performance big picture anyways. there are better bencmarks out there, you would have to post different results from differing benchmarks too. heres trinity kernel with the rasbean jelly rom..
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

simms22 said:
besides for quadrant being an outdated benchmark, you need to learn how to benchmark properly before anyone would consider your results valid. and quadrant would only show one narrow slice of of the whole performance big picture anyways. there are better bencmarks out there, you would have to post different results from differing benchmarks too. heres trinity kernel with the rasbean jelly rom..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you overclock?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

[Q] SAD!! Why is my Antutu Benchmark is too low?

My first attempt on Antutu scored 20k, 2nd 21k and last 20k. Btw, I'm using cyanogenmod lastest nightly with this custom kernel and also fauxclock.
Here are my clock settings:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My last attempt scored like this:
and compared to other LG G2:
I'm little worried about the result that my device had. I think it is really low.
Can someone share their OC/GPU/UV settings that will be good at gaming but not that hot?
Thanks in advance and hope you can help me guys.

Does your device still run swiftly?
Benchmarks are pretty to look at, when you have nice scores. But in reality they are meaningless.
Just my opinion of coarse.
Sent from my LG-D801 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

Hi,
Read the lastest pages of the kernel thread I (we) speak about thermal throttling... Maybe your CPU can't handle the overclock to 2,5 Ghz too...
Plus AOSP/CM rom scores always lower than stock, I mean compared with LG rom.
You are complaining in your other thread about CPU temp and you are overclock to 2,5 Ghz for benchs...

Why does it even matter? Benchmarks are lame.

Best Score of AnTuTu Benchmark for K3 Note

Today I got AnTuTu Benchmark score of 46328 for Lenovo K3 Note which I think is the highest anyone has got for this device.
I am currently running a whole new customised Nexus ROM(5.1).
Guys please post your score and see whether mine is highest in the world.
Here is the proof:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
And here 46252

I had once 47XXX or 48XXX for sure
With vibe ui

with antutu i also get almost 47x. however what is interesting to me when using passmark benchmarking this phone shows a significant higher score than the redmi note 2 even competing with the s6 in the raw cpu score. as a matter of fact the website shows the lenovo with a score of 120x however my personal score with a custom rom and some minor modifications showed this:

http://www.androidbenchmark.net/cpumark_chart.html

Best score?On VIBEUI_V3.0_1552_7.382.1_DEV_K50-T5 ROM fresh install.Antutu 6.0

Made it to 50500...

Sent from my Lenovo K50-t5 using Tapatalk

Have you tried other governors for better battery life? Other kernels? What worked?

I have now started testing a little - first with changing the governors (with Kernel Adiutor) from the default (which seems to be schedutil) to other combinations (on my old OP3T conservative on the Big cores and interactive on the Little ones was looking like a very good compromise, but the BluSpark kernel also had some options for touch boost that don't seem to be active on the stock Taimen kernel; also on OP3T making both conservative would save even more battery power but you would get lag on gapless music and other similar stuff).
What worked best for you?

Changing the governor on your p2xl!?!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Why would you do that? Battery works great

TBH I've been told by at least a couple kernel devs that the current schedulers are so optimised it's not really worth messing with them.

Triscuit said:
TBH I've been told by at least a couple kernel devs that the current schedulers are so optimised it's not really worth messing with them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Couldn't agree more with your post. When Flash, Flar2, and DespairFactor tell me to leave it at stock settings.....I listen! :good:

Go with the developers stock defaults....