I tried different kernels to test the performance of each.i used quadrant to test the performance.
* Stock CM10 kernel -3471
* Bricked kernel- 4171
* Trinity kernel - 3948
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
besides for quadrant being an outdated benchmark, you need to learn how to benchmark properly before anyone would consider your results valid. and quadrant would only show one narrow slice of of the whole performance big picture anyways. there are better bencmarks out there, you would have to post different results from differing benchmarks too. heres trinity kernel with the rasbean jelly rom..
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
simms22 said:
besides for quadrant being an outdated benchmark, you need to learn how to benchmark properly before anyone would consider your results valid. and quadrant would only show one narrow slice of of the whole performance big picture anyways. there are better bencmarks out there, you would have to post different results from differing benchmarks too. heres trinity kernel with the rasbean jelly rom..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you overclock?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
Related
I know benchmarking scores shouldnt be the only thing on which we can judge things but still many people wanted to see so here is a video that i came across and wanted to share with all of you
Also S2 performed very well with this LS8 firmware . Scoring 4229 just below HTC OneX
http://youtu.be/g7Je3lq-RQs?t=3m42s
I get 3100 points using vanilla rootbox without overclocking , standard cpu states and undervolt
Conny84 said:
I get 3100 points using vanilla rootbox without overclocking , standard cpu states and undervolt
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ohh and here we are all on stock .. with no OC and other stuff . And I think it performed good !
With xxlsj omega 18 and Dorimanx kernel
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Yeah but you got Dorimanx and he post his Stock Kernel performance, so its not that bad
Nice score over here
4529 here on Omega v18 (LSJ) so be interesting when a fully modded v19 (LS8) comes out.
4548 on ROM XXLS8 4.1.2 SPAIN
it's underclocked to 1000mhz
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
I overclocked with setcpu and got amazing benchmark:3252.
Here is the screenshot.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
To do this you need A1 KERNAL.
Credits : setcpu,A1 kernal.
What ROM are you using?
Sorry for the late reply
Sorry for the late reply I of the xda for some days.
I am using stock is rom.
Dude... I actually don't care about quadrant scores but... I must say..
YOU LITERALLY JUST GOT OWNED BY A HAPPY CM10.1 USER.
It's not necessary to use A1 kernel for high quadrant scores, i use 100% pershoot's work and i'm fine
Lool ))
Xandom said:
I overclocked with setcpu and got amazing benchmark:3252.
Here is the screenshot.
View attachment 1845556
To do this you need A1 KERNAL.
Credits : setcpu,A1 kernal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That benchmark is really bad bro, my xperia J even gets better, and it's low end device! (benchmark score: over 4000)
Verstuurd van mijn GT-P7510 met Tapatalk
used pa 3.1 (8 apr) kernel matr1x 8.0 (i saw just now 8.5 is out)
and no more talking...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
i was getting with previous pa and faux123's kernel 9k-10.5k, and i must tell, there is something wrong with faux123's kernel about cpu... with it getting extermely low cpu score
and, post your nexus 4 3DMark scores right here!
Adnan008 said:
used pa 3.1 (8 apr) kernel matr1x 8.0 (i saw just now 8.5 is out)
and no more talking...
i was getting with previous pa and faux123's kernel 9k-10.5k, and i must tell, there is something wrong with faux123's kernel about cpu... with it getting extermely low cpu score
and, post your nexus 4 3DMark scores right here!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wake up, there is already a thread.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Girn said:
Wake up, there is already a thread.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and if you wrote link it would be awesome!
My first attempt on Antutu scored 20k, 2nd 21k and last 20k. Btw, I'm using cyanogenmod lastest nightly with this custom kernel and also fauxclock.
Here are my clock settings:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My last attempt scored like this:
and compared to other LG G2:
I'm little worried about the result that my device had. I think it is really low.
Can someone share their OC/GPU/UV settings that will be good at gaming but not that hot?
Thanks in advance and hope you can help me guys.
Does your device still run swiftly?
Benchmarks are pretty to look at, when you have nice scores. But in reality they are meaningless.
Just my opinion of coarse.
Sent from my LG-D801 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Hi,
Read the lastest pages of the kernel thread I (we) speak about thermal throttling... Maybe your CPU can't handle the overclock to 2,5 Ghz too...
Plus AOSP/CM rom scores always lower than stock, I mean compared with LG rom.
You are complaining in your other thread about CPU temp and you are overclock to 2,5 Ghz for benchs...
Why does it even matter? Benchmarks are lame.
Since the start of the Nexus 6 forums, countless amounts of Roms and kernels have been posted. There are a lot of individuals who are amazed but lost on which Rom they may feel is superior. I would assume that the tests would result in the same but this in fact was not the same when I tested two separate roms as one was noticeably higher than the other.
For the sake of consistency, it would be much easier if everyone used the same benchmark app. After a decent amount of research, I found that Vellamo Mobile Benchmark by Qualcomm themselves was the best.
If you are able to run the tests, provide a screenshot along with the Rom name with version if possible and maybe even the Kernel Used. Out of the three tests, only browser can deviate based on your own personal preference. If this thread gets a good start, I will update this with Updated Info based on what is posted.
Thank You
Test Results
[5.0.2][LRX22G] Chroma – 02/01/2015
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Full Test (Metal) - 1684
MultiCore - 1616
Browser (Chrome Beta) - 3350
CherryCM12 (Stock+Cherry Picks) (2015-02-03)
Full Test (Metal) - 1574
MultiCore - 1756
Browser (Stock) - 2754
We already have a benchmark thread
Nexus 6 Benchmark Thread
Closed