Hi all,
When I bought my Defy + I installed CM9 (Android 4.0.4),
CM9 switched off everyday, it had few bugs, because it's IMM76D I think..
Then I installed Codename Android (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1585905)
It works much better ! Do you think it's the best Android 4 ROM for Defy + ?
Thanks
Did you have to install any battery fixes?
Glad to know its working for you. Though epsilon3 and Quarx have been doing great work there are still a few bugs.
Hey, no :O
I will install CM7 in fact (for the moment) untill a stable verison of CM9
In fact no, Codename is so good, I'll stay with it
Raphael-1427 said:
Hi all,
When I bought my Defy + I installed CM9 (Android 4.0.4),
CM9 switched off everyday, it had few bugs, because it's IMM76D I think..
Then I installed Codename Android (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1585905)
It works much better ! Do you think it's the best Android 4 ROM for Defy + ?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats a froyo build.. right?? So you need to flash the froyo kernel..
Sent from my Defy+ using Tapatalk 2
neo.ank said:
Thats a froyo build.. right?? So you need to flash the froyo kernel..
Sent from my Defy+ using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know sorry im noob..
Raphael-1427 said:
I don't know sorry im noob..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay.. So you have a defy+ and flashed this ROM
And it works??
I`ve tested a couple of ROM`s (MS2Ginger, MIUI, CM7 e CM9 and a few others)
In Fact, CM9 still a little buggy, but Epyslon and Quarx`s have made a really great work with his nightly`s
At now i`m on Epyslon Defy+ 042812 last nightly with MS2Ginger4.0 running as virtual system in multiboot and i really love it
Raphael-1427 said:
Hi all,
When I bought my Defy + I installed CM9 (Android 4.0.4),
CM9 switched off everyday, it had few bugs, because it's IMM76D I think..
Then I installed Codename Android (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1585905)
It works much better ! Do you think it's the best Android 4 ROM for Defy + ?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
neo.ank said:
Okay.. So you have a defy+ and flashed this ROM
And it works??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes
KriegerBread said:
I`ve tested a couple of ROM`s (MS2Ginger, MIUI, CM7 e CM9 and a few others)
In Fact, CM9 still a little buggy, but Epyslon and Quarx`s have made a really great work with his nightly`s
At now i`m on Epyslon Defy+ 042812 last nightly with MS2Ginger4.0 running as virtual system in multiboot and i really love it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh nice your Rom is better than mine ? It's Android 4 ?
I have not tested this ROM yet, so i can`t compare it.
Epy`s last nightly defy+ smoothy than others... I think this ROM also very fast, with no FC, no random reboot until now and i`ve noticed a better performance to play some games too (GTA3 with no lags LOL). Video bug still remains (Video works fine in defy bayer camera with Epyslon CM9 4.0.4 042812 MB525 nightly) but this doesn`t problem for me now, cause with MS2ginger4 i have video 720p record and panorama (thank`s to Walter79)...
ps: Sorry my "buggy" english!
Raphael-1427 said:
Yes
Oh nice your Rom is better than mine ? It's Android 4 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
_______________________________________
Defy MB525 Bayer camera
Epyslon 042812 DefyPlus nightly + MS2ginger4.0 in multiboot
Oww it looks nice, where can I found the same ROM as you please ?
CM9 ROM`s Quarx`s and Epyslon in this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1432100
MS2Ginger4.0 by Walter79 here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1140839 (PS: This ROM doesn`t boot as virtual system when used with froyo kernel (CM7) for me :/ With GB kernel CM9 works fine )
Raphael-1427 said:
Oww it looks nice, where can I found the same ROM as you please ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
KriegerBread said:
CM9 ROM`s Quarx`s and Epyslon in this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1432100
MS2Ginger4.0 by Walter79 here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1140839 (PS: This ROM doesn`t boot as virtual system when used with froyo kernel (CM7) for me :/ With GB kernel CM9 works fine )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Omg too hard for me xD
You have 2 ROM ? Why ?
Raphael-1427 said:
Yes
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats really strange.
Can you tell me your stock version information, If you remember..
I use two ROM`s in multiboot cause i wan`t ICS 4.0.4 and 720p video recorder + panorama in the same device
Raphael-1427 said:
Omg too hard for me xD
You have 2 ROM ? Why ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
______________________________________
Current phone: Defy Bayer Camera
Android: Nightly 4.0.4 Epsylon3 DefyPlus 04/28/2012 in multiboot with MS2ginger4[/B]
KriegerBread said:
I use two ROM`s in multiboot cause i wan`t ICS 4.0.4 and 720p video recorder + panorama in the same device
______________________________________
Current phone: Defy Bayer Camera
Android: Nightly 4.0.4 Epsylon3 DefyPlus 04/28/2012 in multiboot with MS2ginger4[/B]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah ok i understand now tanks, your CM9 is the laggy one?
neo.ank said:
Thats really strange.
Can you tell me your stock version information, If you remember..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry I didn't see your message, what is the french for Stock Version please?
Today at morning i flashed cm9 Quarx`s nighty for defy+ (Video recorder works great. Only panorama not not working) The rom is very smooth and stable, with no reboot. So I dont need MS2ginger in multiboot anymore
Take a loook in the Quarx`s defy+ last nightly (Only if defy red lens or defypplus, off corse!)
Ps: CM9 nightylies works better with Defy red/Defy+ - 4.5.2-109_DHT-22 kernel than CM9 Kernel
Good luck!
Raphael-1427 said:
Ah ok i understand now tanks, your CM9 is the laggy one?
Sorry I didn't see your message, what is the french for Stock Version please?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
____________________
Defy Bayer Camera
Quarx`s 042912 Defy+ nightly @1000mhz
Walter79 Defy red/Defy+ - 4.5.2-109_DHT-22 kernel
KriegerBread said:
Today at morning i flashed cm9 Quarx`s nighty for defy+ (Video recorder works great. Only panorama not not working) The rom is very smooth and stable, with no reboot. So I dont need MS2ginger in multiboot anymore
Take a loook in the Quarx`s defy+ last nightly (Only if defy red lens or defypplus, off corse!)
Ps: CM9 nightylies works better with Defy red/Defy+ - 4.5.2-109_DHT-22 kernel than CM9 Kernel
Good luck!
____________________
Defy Bayer Camera
Quarx`s 042912 Defy+ nightly @1000mhz
Walter79 Defy red/Defy+ - 4.5.2-109_DHT-22 kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oww ok realy nice thanks i'll try this tomorrow
Raphael-1427 said:
Sorry I didn't see your message, what is the french for Stock Version please?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it should be like
Code:
la version d'usine
If you remember..
neo.ank said:
it should be like
Code:
la version d'usine
If you remember..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks ^^ When I bought it it was Android 2.3.6
Raphael-1427 said:
Thanks ^^ When I bought it it was Android 2.3.6
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats really amazing.. This phone is actually a weird piece.
Technically 'Codename Android' is incompatible to your defy+ and should give you bootloops. But here you are and its working.
What's the best ics rom for defy*?
What's the diference of AOSP, AOKP and CM9?
*With Red Lens.
Sorry for my English, I'm Brazilian
cm9 i use it, camera is buggy, but other things working good. the AOSP and AOKP is bulilt for cm9. sorry for my bed english i'm from hungary
Actually I'm using AOKP Milestone 5 beta 8 by Sesme and it's so good!
I am using CM9 Quarx 0522. Video playback is laggy, panorama doesn't work and there is partial implementation of HWA. But I like it very much!
I think that cm9 is more suitable for defy
I think cm9 is the best actually.
for me the best is the CM9 - 26/05 Epsylon + fix.
works fine!
vlw...
I know none of these are as stable as CM7, but what Jellybean rom is best as of now? Smokin901's AOSP or ThdDude's CM10 or AOKP JB by Xylograph?
KShion619 said:
I know none of these are as stable as CM7, but what Jellybean rom is best as of now? Smokin901's AOSP or ThdDude's CM10 or AOKP JB by Xylograph?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have used all and IMO thedudes cm10 is the most stable and quickest....... Try them out roms always act different on different phones
is there a patch for recording 720p videos for cm9 quarx builds defy+ ??? please help!!
Why use cm9 when we have cm10? As far as I remember Quarx added the feature to cm10, but there were reports of lagginess. Search Quarx's cm10 thread in dev section for it.
Edit: 09.24 changelog: added 720p (not default, unstable)
Sent from my Defy green lense using xda-developers app
sa3e1 said:
Why use cm9 when we have cm10? As far as I remember Quarx added the feature to cm10, but there were reports of lagginess. Search Quarx's cm10 thread in dev section for it.
Edit: 09.24 changelog: added 720p (not default, unstable)
Sent from my Defy green lense using xda-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i am using cm9 just because cm10 is not still super stable..in fact for d last two months..i used the stock rom..rooted..and then when i found it buggy and laggying i had to change it..and i read that cm9 was superstable with no bugs..so i installed it
Tapajyoti said:
i am using cm9 just because cm10 is not still super stable..in fact for d last two months..i used the stock rom..rooted..and then when i found it buggy and laggying i had to change it..and i read that cm9 was superstable with no bugs..so i installed it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM10 is by far more stable than CM9, you should try the latest ROM.
Im using Cm7.2 absolutely stable..
Now i wish to update to a new version !!
cm9 is stopped and cant find download link
cm10.1 is on progress....
or any AOSP Stable ICS/ JB ?
Basically i need a stable one for max daily usage with max battery ... i use internet and games rarely
and whats this thread contains.. many ROM names and which one are for DEFY !!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1824551
CM9 is the best option for you. Go to uncledan's android mirror to get CM9
I'm using CM10 27/05 but it does have few bugs.
All the roms on that thread are for the Defy and Defy+.
hotdog125 said:
CM9 is the best option for you. Go to uncledan's android mirror to get CM9
I'm using CM10 27/05 but it does have few bugs.
All the roms on that thread are for the Defy and Defy+.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quarx' CM10 18/03 was pretty stable, no bugs at all for me. 27/05 is considerably faster though. I'd say CM10 is a safe bet as it's quite mature by now. Be aware that some of these builds are marked as experimental (the ones with the red colour)
I am using Quarx' CM10 17/2 with Blechdose 22/3 Jellyx kernel... It's very smooth and stable
thanks you all...(i mean it)
decided to try cm9 ...
downloaded the last one from http://defy-cm.net/defy-cm9-nightly/ (its Quarx)
flashed the OS , its gr8 for now. will update soon .
Going to install basebandswitcher 4.
and also battery calibration tool after a full recharge !!
inbetween one dbt ..im using a DEFY mb525 .(prev os was cm7.2). So my kernel will be a FROYO One . R8?
Should i install GB kernel for better performance ...?
cm9 of Quarx Vs cm9.1 of epsylon
like i said i installed Quarx cm9
now found a cm9.1 by epsylon http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1353003
anyone tried this !!
v2dare said:
like i said i installed Quarx cm9
now found a cm9.1 by epsylon http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1353003
anyone tried this !!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, there's not much of a difference. You don't need to install any kernel.
But in this thread it shows i need to flash kernel
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1618904
r8 now my phone shows kernel as 2.6.32.9-gb ....
got kernel-gb-234-451-134-signed.zip from http://defy.wdscript.fr/kernel/
Before that my Questions are
should i update the KERNEL .. its some threads its shown Kernal Update is necessary ...
hotdog125 said:
Yes, there's not much of a difference. You don't need to install any kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse