Samsung Galaxy S II Tegra (Galaxy Royal) i9103
Available in Europe from at least 104 Online shops:
http://skinflint.co.uk/eu/670691
Telecoms are selling the "i9103 Samsung Galaxy S II Tegra" for 300 US$ less then the i9100 Samsung Galaxy S II. So many customers buy the i9103.
Some of the custom telecom versions out there:
Hutchinson 3 Samsung Galaxy R i9103
O2 Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Vodafone Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Mobilcom Debitel Samsung Galaxy R i9103
T-Mobile/Telekom Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Telco Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Base Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Talkline Samsung Galaxy R i9103
E-Plus Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Hope we soon get our own forum or we will have to use the i9100 forum.
Click picture to enlarge:
tegra now?...why so late???omg...
Its already available in India since a month. Its more like a Dual Core version of Galaxy S rather than S2. It has almost same features of Galaxy S except for dual core. 5 MP cam, 512 Mb Ram, 4.1 inch SLCD screen etc.
http://www.flipkart.com/mobiles/sam...qw--&ref=16a7bad0-7777-4e16-b755-cc8f2840eccc
it has 1GB RAM 4.19" and SLCD and flash LED.
I don't think this counts as a Galaxy S II, or even a Galaxy S device...
The closer aproach would be like an S2 SCL. S is i9000 and S SCL I9003, this is I9103 and S2 is the original I9100, so more or less like S2 SCL.
But it's Galaxy R (with different hw)...not Galaxy S2...though the code is I9103...very strange...
I have a Galaxy R (i9103) and a Galaxy S (i9000).
Galaxy R is a nice phone. Very very fast and good looking. I think it is very similar to the S2 (i9100) because it looks like it has the same crap implementation of the Yahama DAC. Galaxy S sounds waaay better with Voodoo Sound and I am still using it as my personal phone.
If the only difference is the CPU+GPU part, S2 ROMs may be kind of "compatible". Changing the kernel and other details could be the only needed actions to get some proper ROMs for this phone.
Endoran said:
I don't think this counts as a Galaxy S II, or even a Galaxy S device...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
S II Tegra is one of its names. And it is faster then SII:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=19879762
legion1911 said:
S II Tegra is one of its names. And it is faster then SII:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=19879762
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol? Mali plus exynos is a way more faster than tegra crap.
Sent from HydrOG3N MOD S2.
Technology Evolves, Android Evolves.
HydrOG3N is THE Revolution.
Tegra 2 is Android reference design for Android tablets. So it is not crap.
The Galaxy Tab 10.1 is also Tegra 2.
The Galaxy R does everything a Galaxy Tab 10.1 does, but it fits into the pocket of your Jeans.
"The Samsung Galaxy R I9103 is an Android smartphone that was announced by Samsung on August 10, 2011 as a variant to the Samsung Galaxy S II."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_R
"The Samsung Galaxy R is one of the currently available variants of the Galaxy S II."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_S_II
legion1911 said:
S II Tegra is one of its names. And it is faster then SII:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=19879762
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol its very well documented that Mali is (a lot) faster than tegra II...
please don't start this again and do your researches before posting random benchmarks trying to prove something that's not true...
If benchmark scores were to be taken seriously, I can have higher scores than yours without overclocking my phone as you did to get those scores...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
The back of the phone looks better than our Exynos models... we still blow every phone out of the water though in terms of performance .
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Teio said:
Lol its very well documented that Mali is (a lot) faster than tegra II...
please don't start this again and do your researches before posting random benchmarks trying to prove something that's not true...
If benchmark scores were to be taken seriously, I can have higher scores than yours without overclocking my phone as you did to get those scores...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
King Shady said:
The back of the phone looks better than our Exynos models... we still blow every phone out of the water though in terms of performance .
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
a lot (by hair)
Blow (blow job)
truth to be told it's not worthy upgrade to original SGS wahahahahahaha
you'r just trying to justify great amount of cash spent
you too
thought i was the only one with an s2 and still using my galaxy s as my daily phone.. for same reason. crap sound chip, also slow gps lock times.
josjator said:
I have a Galaxy R (i9103) and a Galaxy S (i9000).
Galaxy R is a nice phone. Very very fast and good looking. I think it is very similar to the S2 (i9100) because it looks like it has the same crap implementation of the Yahama DAC. Galaxy S sounds waaay better with Voodoo Sound and I am still using it as my personal phone.
If the only difference is the CPU+GPU part, S2 ROMs may be kind of "compatible". Changing the kernel and other details could be the only needed actions to get some proper ROMs for this phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
whats faster S2 tegra or exynos? I haven could to test the tegra ...
-Nane- said:
whats faster S2 tegra or exynos? I haven could to test the tegra ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Search?
Sent from my GT-I9100
Can someone check the DAC on this phone? Also, does it support USB OTG and MHL?
samsung galxy r i9103 usb on the go!!!
can u tell me if this device supports usb on the go just lyk its big brother s2?????????
Teio said:
If benchmark scores were to be taken seriously, I can have higher scores than yours without overclocking my phone as you did to get those scores...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On custom roms for sure Come on, why should you overclock if you have originally faster cpu (1,2 vs 1,0) ?
I tested both handsets (stock roms) and results of quadrant, smartbench, cf... were almost the same, little higher in favor of sgs2 (1,2 ghz ex compared to tegra's 1 ghz). Clocked to 1.2 ghz tegra had slightly better scores in every test.
No need to argue about that, I know what experts say about exynos' and tegra's performance. The thing is that for average user is really hard to notice which of those two handsets is snappier.
Hi, so recently I flashed the Siyah Kernel on my S3 GT-I9300T. I downloaded STweaks so that I can do some tweaks to my S3. Then I went under CPU SCALING SETTINGS and changed the MAX CPU LOCK to single core (so that my S3 would run on 1 core to save more battery), but I was worried if it was going to do any damage to the core if it was under a lot of pressure (like playing heavy 3D games).
Thanks.
Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting
For all of your questions relating to the Samsung Galaxy S III
which model have the best proccessor
i9500 or i9505 or i9502 or ..
The I9500 is marginally faster and more power efficient. It also has better audio hardware, although I have read the difference is negligible.
The I9505 is marginally slower than the I9500 but is better for compatibility and ease of development, hence the availability of a working Cyanogenmod 10.1 build already. It also has 4G, unlike the I9500.
The I9502 is a dual sim version of the I9500.
Which one is better? Does the Grand Duos have a Gpu? How does its dual core processor compare to quad core of Quattro?
Main requirement is dual SIM with good display and battery life and also able to play some games such as Subway Surfers. I am tilted towards Grand Duos because of better camera.
Sent from Samsung Note 2 N7100 using Tapatalk 2
I have galaxy grand and my friend has the quattro
I never regretted buying the grand
when using the quattro I Don't feel the extra bump of the processor and the games lag because of the quattro's basic gpu adreno 203
on the contrary the same game with the same apk never lag in grand even in power saving mode because of the better gpu of grand videocore IV
plus the extra screen real estate and better camera an 1080 play and recording of grand are all plus points for me
quattro is a joke really compared to grand in real life performance don't be fooled by benchmarking
and quattro practically has no development going for it that means no mods no custom roms and be grateful if it even has a rooting method "really bad for me"
that's my opinion and the decision is for you
Go for Grand if possible. Trust me, Galaxy Grand smoke away Galaxy Win miles away. Although Grand are using 1.2GHz A9 core + Video Core IV, are way better than Win Quad-Core 1.2 A5 core + Adreno 203.
Subway Surfers problem can be solved (If you having it) by upgrading your firmware. OTA or ODIN.
Grand is better than quattaro in terms of specs, screen, camera:good::good::good:
Grand is better in every aspect
Camera
Display
Gpu
Cpu
Official 4.2.2 update by Samsung
Bigger battery
Etc etc
sent from Samsung Galaxy Grand
Galaxy win is a good idea if you have your budget limited.
Quattro has high benchmark still poor performance don't know why... my brother has that phone...
I have grand. He wants to exchange with me. Lol.. now you decide...
To err is human; to forgive is divine
I think that Galaxy GranD Is Better than Win Duos ... win duos have an older processor ...
Is there any rom built for samsung galaxy A9 pro
i hv seen that there is only one rom
and can any one tell that how can i install always on display on my samsung galaxy a9 pro