where can port JELLY BAM
Don't flash that unless you actually have a Galaxy i9000. It'd probably brick the HTC One.
i wrote where can port JELLY BAM
There is already a Jelly BAM rom for the m7 BUT IT IS A FORBIDDEN ROM ON XDA! iGio was banned and linking to a banned user's work (unofficial or official) is against the rules.
This type of discussion is not allowed on XDA. The user and ROM have been banned
Closed
Related
flash v1.6.2 yesterday to replace my official rom.
this new jelly bean rom is stable and fast.
i do not like quick navi style task bar, which cause more clicks for normal task.
Yes it is a great rom but please don't start threads like this. It would be much better if you gave feedback directly in the rom thread. Or in the Jellybean discussion thread.
You might want to remove [ROM][AOSP][7/25/2012] from your thread title. You really only should add that if you are the author and posting your dev status, updates, and general support chatter in the thread, which would be in the dev forum BTW.
I really don't get why there are 2 seperate Android development sub-forums if the mods leave them so unorganized and all threads mixed. That's make it so much harder to find things.
You should either combine them into 1 forum or make sure the right threads are in the right forums.
For example, all the below appear in the "Galaxy S III Android Development" while they supposed to be at the "Galaxy S III ORIGINAL (AOSP/AOKP) Android Development" (there are many more threads need to be shifted)
[ROM][AOSP][JB][4.1.1][STABLE] Android 4.1.1 JellyBean - BUILD 3 [31-07-12]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1737449
[ROM][UNOFFICIAL][15-07-12] Android Open Kang Project - I9300 - Milestone 6
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1716001
[ROM][JB][4.1.1]PARANOIDANDROID v1.9.3-alpha [CM10Hybrid][30/07/2012]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1745003
[CM10][UNOFFICIAL][JUL31] temasek's UNOFFICIAL BUILD - V8
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1797109
[ROM][AOSP]LiquidSmooth [4.1.1][Jelly Bean] v 2.0 beta 1 [07/30/2012]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1796973
★★★ [ROM][AOSP/SAMMY][XXALF6][06/07] BlackStaR V3 JeLLy BeaN EdiTioN ★★★
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1703030
Please organize the forums.
TIA
P.S. I apologize if I posted this note in the wrong place, feel free to move it if needed.
doclucas said:
I really don't get why there are 2 seperate Android development sub-forums if the mods leave them so unorganized and all threads mixed. That's make it so much harder to find things.
You should either combine them into 1 forum or make sure the right threads are in the right forums.
For example, all the below appear in the "Galaxy S III Android Development" while they supposed to be at the "Galaxy S III ORIGINAL (AOSP/AOKP) Android Development" (there are many more threads need to be shifted)
[ROM][AOSP][JB][4.1.1][STABLE] Android 4.1.1 JellyBean - BUILD 3 [31-07-12]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1737449
[ROM][UNOFFICIAL][15-07-12] Android Open Kang Project - I9300 - Milestone 6
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1716001
[ROM][JB][4.1.1]PARANOIDANDROID v1.9.3-alpha [CM10Hybrid][30/07/2012]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1745003
[CM10][UNOFFICIAL][JUL31] temasek's UNOFFICIAL BUILD - V8
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1797109
[ROM][AOSP]LiquidSmooth [4.1.1][Jelly Bean] v 2.0 beta 1 [07/30/2012]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1796973
★★★[ROM][AOSP/SAMMY][XXALF6][06/07] BlackStaR V3 JeLLy BeaN EdiTioN ★★★
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1703030
Please organize the forums.
TIA
P.S. I apologize if I posted this note in the wrong place, feel free to move it if needed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most of the above, are kangs, builds of original work. Yes, each of these devs created a ROM, but they are all BASED on some original ROM in the Original dev section.
So while you might be thinking all AOSP ROMs are original, they are not.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
If you want to contact a moderator, PM them, opening a thread is a very slow way to get in touch with us.
Read this post on the portal for more information.
If a developer wishes to see their rom moved over, they can contact a moderator to see if it falls within the guidelines.
any cyanogenmod developer here to port CM9 or CM10 roms to galaxy y
I search the most thread and found that galaxy mini same specification as the galaxy y has CM9 (ICS) or CM10 (Jelly Bean) roms ported
and there is no CM roms for galaxy y
please if any developer read this ,,,, I request him to please port these rom for galaxy y
I am dying to use these roms on my galaxy y....
press thanks it cost you nothing
damn the n00bs these days...(i'm one too )
see the Android Development Section... and be active enough to read all the posts in the thread(at least try the one posted by the author)...
search it... the devs are already making progress in CM7 & CM9...
but they cannot get some drivers from our phone's GPU product maker...
u can still download the beta versions.... and read the things working and also the bugs and things not working... search the forum before starting a new thread....
moderator please close the thread....
not working
hdulani said:
damn the n00bs these days...(i'm one too )
see the Android Development Section... and be active enough to read all the posts in the thread(at least try the one posted by the author)...
search it... the devs are already making progress in CM7 & CM9...
but they cannot get some drivers from our phone's GPU product maker...
u can still download the beta versions.... and read the things working and also the bugs and things not working... search the forum before starting a new thread....
moderator please close the thread....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i had already tried beta version but it is not working yet
whenever i flashed that rom my old roms starts up....
and i already search for that so please if you have any than link me......
its very rude to ask things like that,
we already have people working on it,
so its either you wait or get another phone
do some research too,
SGmini is nothing like SGY except that it is an LDPI device,
did you really think we would'nt have a CM if we have same specs are mini?
be lucky someone else is doing the porting for you and its free,
so wait
GALAXY MINI has open source of there GPU DRIVER= adreno 200
GALAXY Y= BROADCOM (sh#t)
Gamer R=CM 10
WhiteXP=cm9
MasterKEy and NANO surfer=cm7
just like deathnotice says get another phone(high end or mid) or wait.. and be lucky because they're doint it for free
and just like the other member said.. BE ACTIVE ENOUGH!! SPECIALY IN ANDROID DEVELOPMENT SECTION DD OKAY??
Hi,
I want to take some time to put together a list of all Galaxy Note 10.1 ROMS with a general description and a link to the initial post on XDA, but before I can do that i need some feedback from your side, is this OK with the developers to have a list of all ROMS together, is this OK with XDA?
If i get the OK, i will keep 2 post below, one with the status of the updates (Waiting feedback / Updating / Finalized until date) and i would ask of the devs that have updates for their ROMS and have posted new Roms to send me an IM just so i can make sure i cover everything.
I would ask that you do not request ETA's because i have a day time job, but I'm every day on XDA so i will do my best to keep it up to date.
Have a great day,
Daniel
[ROM][MD2 V1][N8000] THE LEGEND Fast | Clean | Stable |Battery Life
Compatibility <br> N8000
Type Stock
Android Version 4.1.2
Unofficial Pac-Man 4.3 Roms for N8000 and N8013
Compatibility N8000, N8013
Type CM 10
Android Version 4.3
Status: Updating
You're welcome to help the community.
Thanks a lot.
Sent from my GT-N8000 using Tapatalk HD
See reply to identical question .
Ignore its a reply to a poster who has been deleted
Looking for a ROM for GALAXY NOTE SHV-E230L
very good
This thread dead for 5 years .
any roms are in the development sections .
If any and many no longer valid links.
I see none for your model .
hello. as most users have stock based modded roms, why don't separe the cyanogen? these roms confuse users with rare problems too...... i hope this solution because this is sometimes a problem
easiest, just to go cm homepage.
i don't need cm... the cm's rom invade the android development note 3, i ask why isn't there the separation
Most users don't use stock based roms many many use CM and without CM their would be a none to poor development scene .
One of the basics is if you don't understand then don't use modded firmware .
i asked for forum organization, and not for say that cm is better or not than stock based.... your answer is not pertinent to my question. goodbye
myabc said:
i don't need cm... the cm's rom invade the android development note 3, i ask why isn't there the separation
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What? CM "invades" Android development? :laugh: You can guess who the first team was, to modify Android and present it as a custom ROM in the Android Development section. What's actually invading the Android Development section are all those "Stable, ROCK SOLID,® 100% Stable | BETTARY LAyF ◄◄©" TouchWiz ROM's! Those need a seperate section called "Stock ROM's with community bloatware instead of OEM bloatware claiming to break the barriers of physiks and being faster than light and breaking the first and second law of thermodynamics"... Not all of them of course. Exceptions are there.
Know where you are and why you are here!