I really don't get why there are 2 seperate Android development sub-forums if the mods leave them so unorganized and all threads mixed. That's make it so much harder to find things.
You should either combine them into 1 forum or make sure the right threads are in the right forums.
For example, all the below appear in the "Galaxy S III Android Development" while they supposed to be at the "Galaxy S III ORIGINAL (AOSP/AOKP) Android Development" (there are many more threads need to be shifted)
[ROM][AOSP][JB][4.1.1][STABLE] Android 4.1.1 JellyBean - BUILD 3 [31-07-12]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1737449
[ROM][UNOFFICIAL][15-07-12] Android Open Kang Project - I9300 - Milestone 6
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1716001
[ROM][JB][4.1.1]PARANOIDANDROID v1.9.3-alpha [CM10Hybrid][30/07/2012]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1745003
[CM10][UNOFFICIAL][JUL31] temasek's UNOFFICIAL BUILD - V8
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1797109
[ROM][AOSP]LiquidSmooth [4.1.1][Jelly Bean] v 2.0 beta 1 [07/30/2012]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1796973
★★★ [ROM][AOSP/SAMMY][XXALF6][06/07] BlackStaR V3 JeLLy BeaN EdiTioN ★★★
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1703030
Please organize the forums.
TIA
P.S. I apologize if I posted this note in the wrong place, feel free to move it if needed.
doclucas said:
I really don't get why there are 2 seperate Android development sub-forums if the mods leave them so unorganized and all threads mixed. That's make it so much harder to find things.
You should either combine them into 1 forum or make sure the right threads are in the right forums.
For example, all the below appear in the "Galaxy S III Android Development" while they supposed to be at the "Galaxy S III ORIGINAL (AOSP/AOKP) Android Development" (there are many more threads need to be shifted)
[ROM][AOSP][JB][4.1.1][STABLE] Android 4.1.1 JellyBean - BUILD 3 [31-07-12]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1737449
[ROM][UNOFFICIAL][15-07-12] Android Open Kang Project - I9300 - Milestone 6
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1716001
[ROM][JB][4.1.1]PARANOIDANDROID v1.9.3-alpha [CM10Hybrid][30/07/2012]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1745003
[CM10][UNOFFICIAL][JUL31] temasek's UNOFFICIAL BUILD - V8
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1797109
[ROM][AOSP]LiquidSmooth [4.1.1][Jelly Bean] v 2.0 beta 1 [07/30/2012]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1796973
★★★[ROM][AOSP/SAMMY][XXALF6][06/07] BlackStaR V3 JeLLy BeaN EdiTioN ★★★
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1703030
Please organize the forums.
TIA
P.S. I apologize if I posted this note in the wrong place, feel free to move it if needed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most of the above, are kangs, builds of original work. Yes, each of these devs created a ROM, but they are all BASED on some original ROM in the Original dev section.
So while you might be thinking all AOSP ROMs are original, they are not.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
If you want to contact a moderator, PM them, opening a thread is a very slow way to get in touch with us.
Read this post on the portal for more information.
If a developer wishes to see their rom moved over, they can contact a moderator to see if it falls within the guidelines.
Related
Alright everyone, Angelos from www.roms-db.com contacted me.
And i'm happy to let you know that after high demand, he's finished in adding all the Galaxy S III roms to his database of custom roms http://galaxys3.roms-db.com/.
He would greatly appreciate it if everyone could check out his site and maybe give some feedback if any information is wrong or missing. Also when there are any updates not mentioned (for example the android version (4.0.3
..., or the rom base (Touchwiz, etc...)))
The site for the Galaxy S III roms is http://galaxys3.roms-db.com/
Thanks Angelos!
I would appreciate it if a moderator could make this a sticky since it's going to be a great help to the forum and the members/cooks!
Cheers!
Thanx, but if u calculate replies per day, please use the date of first post, not the one u added it to the db ...
–—–—–—–—–—–—–—–—
tapatalked from Galaxy SIII
hi, nice work...
but i found that android 4.1 is still not out...
so the one that you wrote is android 4.1 is in realty based on stock LF6 Rom ..
by
kikan
paranoidandroid latest build is from 07/07 mate not 25/06 but it's great
Moved to general, please read this thread for more info about what belongs in the development sections
Thanks guys,
- kikan, fixed the issue with 4.1,
- asphaltkiller, there are 2 ParanoidAndroid versions, the normal one and the experimental one
http://galaxys3.roms-db.com/details/?r=936
http://galaxys3.roms-db.com/details/?r=917
Nice site, real handy
Amaaaazing !!!!
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Hi,
Not sure if this is the right forum to post this but I am looking to purchase the GN2 as my first Android device when the US carriers eventually carries it. Could someone explain what the difference between the Android Development vs the Original Android Development subforums? TIA!
hamsup1o said:
Hi,
Not sure if this is the right forum to post this but I am looking to purchase the GN2 as my first Android device when the US carriers eventually carries it. Could someone explain what the difference between the Android Development vs the Original Android Development subforums? TIA!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all it should go to Questions and Answers subforum (http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1792).
Android Development needs you to post your own port, modifications to the roms/kernels, but you have to keep in mind that you shouldn't post anything that you haven't modified/created yourself (posting links to a rom that you can't support).
Source:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1321268
Original Android Development requires you to post your own work, usually made from scratch, which you can't find in other roms.
Source:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1775656
Someone kindly explain what the difference is between the two forums? I can't figure it out. This
[Nexus⁴]
Same as other forums...it's meant to be
Development - stuff based on the stock image
Original Development - Stuff made from AOSP/scratch
yea me either.
in the N7 forums.. the Kernels I like which are MOTLEY are posted in the Android Development forum yet in the N4 forums... the motley Kernel is posted in the Original development section.
no consistency or description.
i would have to guess that Original development is for development not headed down the path of AOSP or Android aka Linux/Ubuntu etc.. and then android development is for AOSP Android directly related stuff?
Edit i was wrong its reversed from what I thought.
Hi,
I want to take some time to put together a list of all Galaxy Note 10.1 ROMS with a general description and a link to the initial post on XDA, but before I can do that i need some feedback from your side, is this OK with the developers to have a list of all ROMS together, is this OK with XDA?
If i get the OK, i will keep 2 post below, one with the status of the updates (Waiting feedback / Updating / Finalized until date) and i would ask of the devs that have updates for their ROMS and have posted new Roms to send me an IM just so i can make sure i cover everything.
I would ask that you do not request ETA's because i have a day time job, but I'm every day on XDA so i will do my best to keep it up to date.
Have a great day,
Daniel
[ROM][MD2 V1][N8000] THE LEGEND Fast | Clean | Stable |Battery Life
Compatibility <br> N8000
Type Stock
Android Version 4.1.2
Unofficial Pac-Man 4.3 Roms for N8000 and N8013
Compatibility N8000, N8013
Type CM 10
Android Version 4.3
Status: Updating
You're welcome to help the community.
Thanks a lot.
Sent from my GT-N8000 using Tapatalk HD
See reply to identical question .
Ignore its a reply to a poster who has been deleted
Looking for a ROM for GALAXY NOTE SHV-E230L
very good
This thread dead for 5 years .
any roms are in the development sections .
If any and many no longer valid links.
I see none for your model .
hello. as most users have stock based modded roms, why don't separe the cyanogen? these roms confuse users with rare problems too...... i hope this solution because this is sometimes a problem
easiest, just to go cm homepage.
i don't need cm... the cm's rom invade the android development note 3, i ask why isn't there the separation
Most users don't use stock based roms many many use CM and without CM their would be a none to poor development scene .
One of the basics is if you don't understand then don't use modded firmware .
i asked for forum organization, and not for say that cm is better or not than stock based.... your answer is not pertinent to my question. goodbye
myabc said:
i don't need cm... the cm's rom invade the android development note 3, i ask why isn't there the separation
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What? CM "invades" Android development? :laugh: You can guess who the first team was, to modify Android and present it as a custom ROM in the Android Development section. What's actually invading the Android Development section are all those "Stable, ROCK SOLID,® 100% Stable | BETTARY LAyF ◄◄©" TouchWiz ROM's! Those need a seperate section called "Stock ROM's with community bloatware instead of OEM bloatware claiming to break the barriers of physiks and being faster than light and breaking the first and second law of thermodynamics"... Not all of them of course. Exceptions are there.
Know where you are and why you are here!