Hello guys a friend today bought a used nexus 4....I told him that this phone is really fast and nice.he has the galaxy note 2 and I told him that the s4 pro is as good as exynos and even better...so he did some benchmarks in quadrant it only scored 1400 and antutu 5.500.....so what's happening is there any change that he should make so it can run normally....is cpu underclocked?I don't Care about benchmarks but this was strange!
Sent from my HTC Droid DNA
Djmk4 said:
Hello guys a friend today bought a used nexus 4....I told him that this phone is really fast and nice.he has the galaxy note 2 and I told him that the s4 pro is as good as exynos and even better...so he did some benchmarks in quadrant it only scored 1400 and antutu 5.500.....so what's happening is there any change that he should make so it can run normally....is cpu underclocked?I don't Care about benchmarks but this was strange!
Sent from my HTC Droid DNA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it is warm performance go down. Try when it is "cold" and check if there is custom Rom/kernel.
Inviato dal mio Nexus 4 con Tapatalk 2
install 'system tuner' from the market and check cpu governor isn't set to 'power saviour' mode, if it is return it to on-demand
It was on demand I set it on performance in quadrant it did for a little good...but it never goes up from 20frames and it lags......I think its stock with stock kernel!
Sent from my HTC Droid DNA
Only 5.500 in antutu?
impossible. something is not right.
I got 21500 (PA rom with Semaphore kernel).
Ümit said:
Only 5.500 in antutu?
impossible. something is not right.
I got 21500 (PA rom with Semaphore kernel).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly!!!!its strange on performance it scores 7000...because he bought it for his girlfriend as a present he want it stock....but which Rom that is near to.stock and Kernel should I flash for maximum performance?
Sent from my HTC Droid DNA
Related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVML6Q1Qid4&feature=plcp
theandroidrooter88 said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVML6Q1Qid4&feature=plcp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Must be in General Section Dont worry MODs ll move it
Prashanthme said:
Must be in General Section Dont worry MODs ll move it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, thanks for fixing it.
Might want to move this to the T-Mobile GS2 forum.
Quadrant scores are too less. That stops me from using any Cyanogen Mod ROMS.
So far only F1 Galaxy Nexus ROM remains unbeatable in Quadrant scores (without overclocking or any other kernel) Scored around 3800 :good:
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
DD-Ripper said:
Quadrant scores are too less. That stops me from using any Cyanogen Mod ROMS.
So far only F1 Galaxy Nexus ROM remains unbeatable in Quadrant scores (without overclocking or any other kernel) Scored around 3800 :good:
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
High Quadrant scores aren't exactly a reliable standard for a ROM being 'good/bad' or 'slow/fast'. I've used CM10 for a few weeks and over 5 runs in a row Quadrant tested 2754, 2330, 2600, 3100 and 2982...
It's nothing more then a short and fast measurement, and the results aren't consistent at all.
I find daily usage of my phone with a smooth, responsive and reliable ROM far more important then the outcome of a few tests that took 1-2 min....
Sent from my GT-9100
DD-Ripper said:
Quadrant scores are too less. That stops me from using any Cyanogen Mod ROMS.
So far only F1 Galaxy Nexus ROM remains unbeatable in Quadrant scores (without overclocking or any other kernel) Scored around 3800 :good:
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actualled loled at your post. Why do mods let noobs make such lame posts? :S
DD-Ripper said:
Quadrant scores are too less. That stops me from using any Cyanogen Mod ROMS.
So far only F1 Galaxy Nexus ROM remains unbeatable in Quadrant scores (without overclocking or any other kernel) Scored around 3800 :good:
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As the firm says many recognized developers:
However, if you put any trust in Quadrant scores you could use them to prove that dancing naked for 5 minutes in your garden affects device performance. By Chainfire
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good:
DD-Ripper said:
Quadrant scores are too less. That stops me from using any Cyanogen Mod ROMS.
So far only F1 Galaxy Nexus ROM remains unbeatable in Quadrant scores (without overclocking or any other kernel) Scored around 3800 :good:
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think Quadrant scores don't mean much. It doesn't really mirror the user experience fluency. It's pretty much just a number.
Just for the record, I've got the score of 4K on CM9.
Sent from my premium potato
ArmorD said:
I think Quadrant scores don't mean much. It doesn't really mirror the user experience fluency. It's pretty much just a number.
Just for the record, I've got the score of 4K on CM9.
Sent from my premium potato
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But it affects gaming performance. I only bought Samsung Galaxy S2 for Gaming purposes not for development n other stuff....
Btw how did u got 4K on CM9..?? You probably must have Siyah or any other kernel and Overclocked ..I scored around 2800 on CM9 on all default settings..Just after I flashed that Rom
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
DD-Ripper said:
But it affects gaming performance. I only bought Samsung Galaxy S2 for Gaming purposes not for development n other stuff....
Btw how did u got 4K on CM9..?? You probably must have Siyah or any other kernel and Overclocked ..I scored around 2800 on CM9 on all default settings..Just after I flashed that Rom
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A high score during a short test doesn't have anything to do with gaming-performance.
Again: quadrant scores are useless when you're talking about overall performance
Sent from my GT-9100
siedus said:
A high score during a short test doesn't have anything to do with gaming-performance.
Again: quadrant scores are useless when you're talking about overall performance
Sent from my GT-9100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is. If you score less than 3000, heavy games like NOVA 3 gets too much laggy and unplayable (In Multiplayer) unless you over clock.
So I'm not saying that CM10/CM9 is useless, I'm only saying that those ROMS are not good for gaming purposes. You guys are taking my words wrongly.
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
thats what i found
DD-Ripper said:
It is. If you score less than 3000, heavy games like NOVA 3 gets too much laggy and unplayable (In Multiplayer) unless you over clock.
So I'm not saying that CM10/CM9 is useless, I'm only saying that those ROMS are not good for gaming purposes. You guys are taking my words wrongly.
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not taking your words wrongly, i think you don't understand what i'm trying to explain.
But i think this 'discussion' about quadrant scores is a bit off-topic, so maybe it's wise to end it
Sent from my GT-I9100
Aside from quadrant scores meaning absolutely nothing, it should probably be noted that this video is done on the T-Mobile USA model, the SGH-T989. Which has an inferior chipset/CPU. So of course the scores are low.
Hello.this is my antutu result.please share opinion and screenshots.i use cm10 stable with marmite kernel.
Whats your score?
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
My first run was 2700 something, then i rebooted and got this. Running latest cm10.1 nightly, with marmite 8.4. Stock freq.
Looks like cm10 is way faster than cm10.1. OP do you have any mods?
Serris said:
My first run was 2700 something, then i rebooted and got this. Running latest cm10.1 nightly, with marmite 8.4. Stock freq.
Looks like cm10 is way faster than cm10.1. OP do you have any mods?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep i used oc 1400.I just flashed jellyshot with mermite kernel with 1.32 OC and smartass and got this
First two screens are result for cm-10.1-20130408-NIGHTLY rom with cm kernel.
The 3rd and 4th screenshot were made after updating to 20130416-NIGHTLY and flashing mermite-v8.5cm kernel.
Carbon ROM, no over clock and stock
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Over clocked 1300 Carbon ROM
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Yesterday I've overclocked CPU to 1100mHz on marmite_8.5 kernel and got score around 3850 but forgot to take a SS :/
Today, I flashed Air_Kernel_Weekly_r341_JBN_BlueColor_CM, overclocked CPU to 1200mHz and then made the test again. Results in first ss. After that I was courious what are the results for normal CPU frequency. So the results for the same kernel, running at 1000mHz are in the second screenshot.
So the best results were using Air kernel with overclocked CPU. When CPU wasn't overclocked the best results were with latest marmite kernel.
so, I urge CM10.1 users to post their results and that way we'll find the best config
B33zal said:
Yesterday I've overclocked CPU to 1100mHz on marmite_8.5 kernel and got score around 3850 but forgot to take a SS :/
Today, I flashed Air_Kernel_Weekly_r341_JBN_BlueColor_CM, overclocked CPU to 1200mHz and then made the test again. Results in first ss. After that I was courious what are the results for normal CPU frequency. So the results for the same kernel, running at 1000mHz are in the second screenshot.
So the best results were using Air kernel with overclocked CPU. When CPU wasn't overclocked the best results were with latest marmite kernel.
so, I urge CM10.1 users to post their results and that way we'll find the best config
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On general (my experience) 3200-4000 is pretty normal without overclocking depending on rom/kernel/phone/battery level and temperature.. Two identical phones with the same set up will get different scores. Some mods/tweaks can increase this as well as having a good amount of free ram and no other programs running.
But these are just "fun" tests and not a true assessment of real performance..
With that said, Carbon rom is SOOOO much faster..
Ofcourse But as you've said.. It's fun to test out different combinations and it also feels good when you out do the first score for 1000 points and make your phone as good as some more expensive phone ^^
B33zal said:
Ofcourse But as you've said.. It's fun to test out different combinations and it also feels good when you out do the first score for 1000 points and make your phone as good as some more expensive phone ^^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed... And it is fun mopping the floor with slow ROMs (joking)...
This was set at only 800 mhz
Consider yourselves challenged..
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Why your 3D scores under 2k?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
burakgon said:
Why your 3D scores under 2k?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No matter what rom I've tried, I don't get much over 2k on 3d.. this test I was just a bit under, but still damn good for a Nexus S.. I saw you are trying to improve the graphics in your rom, I hope it works, but I really want a faster load time on apps and less lag in everything else. I have tried your rom, on this test as well, and you came up over 500 points below my score of 5300. I test all roms the same with multiple kernels (stock included as well) and different schedulers/ governors.. but as battery life goes you are towards the top..
Hello,
The title says all.
I am getting very low benchmark scores.
In geekbench3: 1200 in single core and 2300 in multi core..
AnTuTu: 44506
What i have done to the moto x style:
unlocked bootloader
Installed supersu and xposed.
Factory reset already done.
Performance seems not that bad actually.
But the scores tells me otherwise.
benchmark scores.
see my screenshots about this issue.
bartjeh1991 said:
Hello,
The title says all.
I am getting very low benchmark scores.
In geekbench3: 1200 in single core and 2300 in multi core..
AnTuTu: 44506
What i have done to the moto x style:
unlocked bootloader
Installed supersu and xposed.
Factory reset already done.
Performance seems not that bad actually.
But the scores tells me otherwise.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If your performance feels good in real world use, why do you need some benchmark to tell you otherwise?
I am on aicp and put xclark kernel to perfromance and got 48k, before i had it on interactive and hotplug on eco performance. No difference felt how device performed.
Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk
bartjeh1991 said:
Hello,
The title says all.
I am getting very low benchmark scores.
In geekbench3: 1200 in single core and 2300 in multi core..
AnTuTu: 44506
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Running CM12.1
AnTuTu 51342
Watch this https://youtu.be/8iMRaIsaFX4?t=4m listen from 4:00-4:30. Hilarious
Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk
eyecon82 said:
Watch this https://youtu.be/8iMRaIsaFX4?t=4m listen from 4:00-4:30. Hilarious
Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOOOL
Samsung has indeed lagg
JohnMcW said:
Running CM12.1
AnTuTu 51342
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How stable is the latest CM12.1?
Is it ready for daily use?
bradley26 said:
If your performance feels good in real world use, why do you need some benchmark to tell you otherwise?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are absolutely right. I was checking some governor settings. And seemed the governor on the little cores, was not at all optimized. Underclocked now because the speed is decent again
bartjeh1991 said:
LOOOL
Samsung has indeed lagg
How stable is the latest CM12.1?
Is it ready for daily use?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been using it as my daily,
Only one issue that has caused some concerns is that, if you lose the phone signal and you are on gsm,
it switches to cdma and then acts like you don't have a sim card...It can take reboots and hours for it to
return to gsm. However this hasn't happened to me for 5 days now with the newer builds.
My phone hardly ever heats up much with cm12.1...and I DON"T use any processor tweaks.
bartjeh1991 said:
LOOOL
Samsung has indeed lagg
How stable is the latest CM12.1?
Is it ready for daily use?
You are absolutely right. I was checking some governor settings. And seemed the governor on the little cores, was not at all optimized. Underclocked now because the speed is decent again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that video goes to exactly show you why benchmarks don't mean anything
I hate apple, but Apple definitely got it right by saying it is not always all about "hardware specs" and it's more of a coexisting relationship between the hardware and software that is more important.
Samsung definitely has the superior hardware, but their ****ty TouchWiz screws it all up
What is the Best antutu score for note 5
Here is my test score
That's really good; I got 65469
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Don't you have anything installed? I got 45k, all apps closed and bootmanager in action to prevent unwanted apps to startup on boot!
I don't have root just used clean master and greenify app
First run I got 70430
i got 74000+, but you should use PCMARK, as it test the more in more scenarios and kinda replicates your daily usage.
I got enormus score.
how s this? running darthstalker 5 and skyhigh 2.1 undervolted by -100mv and overclocked to 2.4 a57 cores and 852mhz gpu.
That's good I mean very good
Hi,
arter97 lastest beta kernel with Interactive governor tweaked a bit for better performance (enforced_mode set to 1, min_sample_time, go_hispeed_load and hispeed_freq tweaked) and some VM tweaks (dirty_ratio, dirty_background_ratio, dirty_expire_centisecs, dirty_writeback_centisecs and swapiness), no undervolt.
CPU temp at 25 °C at the beginning...
SkyHigh 2.7 kernel, some tweaks like above without overclock / underclock:
I use the previous Antutu version to compare with my other scores when I test some tweaks (as a baseline), it would be time to update Antutu now
My antutu score with antutu 6.0 is about 82k.
m4gg0t said:
My antutu score with antutu 6.0 is about 82k.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i got this using darthstalker 5 and skyhigh 2.7
Not bad, im running all stock. Don't really want to root.
m4gg0t said:
Not bad, im running all stock. Don't really want to root.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as you can see..there are real benefits ) not to mention better battery life and all around usage speed, fluidity...but hey, everybody uses their phone as they want. i m a poweruser...
i have 84089
n920c
junior00027 said:
i have 84089
n920c
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the usual score @ stock rom, kernel is anything from 80.000 to 85.000 so you re perfectly stock with the score
Sent from my SM-N920C using Tapatalk
My first test on Venom Note.
Sent from my SM-N920G using Tapatalk
haree87 said:
Sent from my SM-N920C using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kickoff said:
View attachment 3582674
My first test on Venom Note.
Sent from my SM-N920G using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Guys i m sorry to ruin your parade...but any score in red is not a valid one...sorry. When you will get a green score, post that. I could never get above 100.000 green score (max was around 97-98.000 with skyhigh kernel)..the only kernel that gets me over 110.000 is arter kernel and that is known already to have a bug in the UX Section that causes that big score...
score
Every time I'm getting around 80k on stock, which is slightly low i think.
When comparing the stats to the Note 5 at the ranking table its all the same with exception of the 3d score (garden) with my device always getting around 8.3k compared to 12.112 from Note 5 result from the ranking table.
Why do you think my 3d score is low?
Also I don't know if it's related but I have some sort of lag when scrolling through Facebook, YouTube etc...
I am getting 70k score in antutu benchmark, and 30k in standard quadrant. I just got this phone so it's not rooted yet, is it normal or what.
Btw it's snapdragon version
N910f
Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk
Antutu who?
sazasnet said:
I am getting 70k score in antutu benchmark, and 30k in standard quadrant. I just got this phone so it's not rooted yet, is it normal or what.
Btw it's snapdragon version
N910f
Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've just put a new screen on my mates, and put stock rom on this morning and got 69633 I've now flashe the emotion note 5 rom and overclocked it a bit and its just done 72755
Samsung phones usually are Champs on benchmarks but in real world use... They are not as snappy as those benchmarks suggest
Samsungs good old dvfs kicks in when they are benchmarked.