Related
Hi if anyone wanted to know how the desire HD stacks up here are some benchmarks.
Quadrant = ~1800
Linpack = ~40
Neocore = ~58 fps
Uploding a video now :-D
[EDIT]
Video Taking Ages To Upload ...... here are some 0xBenchmark comparisons of the GalaxyS / Desire HD / Desire
http://0xbenchmark.appspot.com/run/[email protected]/GalaxyS
cool!
That Quadrant is a little lower than others have posted. I saw a vid on youtube of it reaching over 2000!
Just did quadrant again and got 1998 so yer 1800 - 2000 sounds right
:-D
having a higher neocore score means this phone does 3D better compared to galaxy s? Any game demo review on the DHD? really wanna see how does it does 3D gaming like asphalt or sandstorm - modern combat (multi touch intense)
------ Added 0xBenchmark to first post ------
override182 said:
having a higher neocore score means this phone does 3D better compared to galaxy s? Any game demo review on the DHD? really wanna see how does it does 3D gaming like asphalt or sandstorm - modern combat (multi touch intense)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Higher score is one thing but the games run better on PowerVR
Beards said:
Higher score is one thing but the games run better on PowerVR
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats why.. hurm.. too bad then, having a higher neocore than the SGS dosent do any good..
Beards said:
Higher score is one thing but the games run better on PowerVR
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't this just an optimization issue?
real life apps
but how does the phone perform in normal use apps? Because i'm thinking about getting the phone but i would like the phone to perform better in apps like psx4Droid than my desire does now.
So does anybody know anything about this ?
Galaxy s phones are limited to 56 fps, check the results for a more demanding benchmark like nenamark
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
android53 said:
Galaxy s phones are limited to 56 fps, check the results for a more demanding benchmark like nenamark
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
then whats the use of having a theoretical 90mil triangle p/s hardware but it cant reach higher than 56fps.. hurm.. such a waste..
override182 said:
then whats the use of having a theoretical 90mil triangle p/s hardware but it cant reach higher than 56fps.. hurm.. such a waste..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Erm. No. The vsync on the screens is 60fps anyway, so rendering faster than that is mostly useless. Also, if you are rendering a more complex scene, you will still have a higher fps with the 90M triangle hardware, it just won't go over 60.
jords12 said:
Erm. No. The vsync on the screens is 60fps anyway, so rendering faster than that is mostly useless. Also, if you are rendering a more complex scene, you will still have a higher fps with the 90M triangle hardware, it just won't go over 60.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly... Anything over 60 is a waste.
Here is my quadrant results.
Look this
HTC Desire HD unboxing + Neocore + Linpack + Quadrant test
ww.youtube.com/watch?v=eTBE9OkDRnU
DevilzDontCry said:
but how does the phone perform in normal use apps? Because i'm thinking about getting the phone but i would like the phone to perform better in apps like psx4Droid than my desire does now.
So does anybody know anything about this ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PSX4Droid runs slow. Quite disappointing. Im not playing PSX-games on Desire HD. Too many good games, and Desire HD doesn’t do the justice.
Was watching PLAY benchmarks, sony did do some GFX tweaking tossing out the idea to lets get cracking and rip their driver for use in our Desire HD
Misleading title. Assumes you already ripped Adreno205 driver.
Would be nice to correct it.
binjinx said:
Was watching PLAY benchmarks, sony did do some GFX tweaking tossing out the idea to lets get cracking and rip their driver for use in our Desire HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
where are those benchmarks? our DHD gets 58fps on neocore, xperia play beats it?
It might just be 2.3 running but it scores on avg 59 I was guessing sony might have took the time to build a tweaked driver but maybe not. Guess we'll have to see when someone gets their hands on it for real
It's normal that the maximum fps you can get on the DHD is about 60. Thats because the frame rate is locked to the refresh rate of the display. Basically the same as v-sync on a pc. And so the framerate of the play should also be around 60fps at neocore.
Would be nice to see a benchmark like nenamark running on the play. Should be more accurate because the framerate isn't at it's maximum (at least on the DHD)
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk
Does this say enough?
ViDtje said:
Does this say enough?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
damn youuuuu sonyyy
Leedroid took a look into the Xperia Play drivers and says they're the same as our DHD's.
Then how is it possible it gets better scores?
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
ViDtje said:
Then how is it possible it gets better scores?
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well benchmarks arent entirely bound on a single component. It may be helped by the CPU and RAM speeds.
A benchmark may focus on a particular component but is never entirely bound to it.
ViDtje said:
Then how is it possible it gets better scores?
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Desire HD also scores 47 on Nemamark.
Mine scores 14 with cyanogen mod
nothing94 said:
Mine scores 14 with cyanogen mod
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you choose the Performance governor?
SupremeBeaver said:
Did you choose the Performance governor?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well,Sony might have rather done something to scale better than HTC.Any HTC phone's graphics benchmarks are crap with the default(ondemand) governor.Change to performance and you are bound to get at least a 30% increase.
Other than that,don't rely on Neocore,it's crap now.Every phone that has an Adreno 205 or better can max out the FPS as it relies on OpenGL ES 1.1 .It was very good for pitting older GPUs one against the other,until the days of the Adreno 200.
tolis626 said:
Well,Sony might have rather done something to scale better than HTC.Any HTC phone's graphics benchmarks are crap with the default(ondemand) governor.Change to performance and you are bound to get at least a 30% increase.
Other than that,don't rely on Neocore,it's crap now.Every phone that has an Adreno 205 or better can max out the FPS as it relies on OpenGL ES 1.1 .It was very good for pitting older GPUs one against the other,until the days of the Adreno 200.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep Neocore is a crap benchmark. But Nenamark isn't (which is what we're discussing)
raze599 said:
Well benchmarks arent entirely bound on a single component. It may be helped by the CPU and RAM speeds.
A benchmark may focus on a particular component but is never entirely bound to it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Th Xperia Play and the Desire HD have the same processor and GPU, the DHD has even more RAM, doesn't seem logical to me
+ 1
Sent from my HTC Desire HD using XDA Premium App
SupremeBeaver said:
Yep Neocore is a crap benchmark. But Nenamark isn't (which is what we're discussing)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Shut up Beaver,I'm backing you up!
That's what I'm sayin' pal.Nenamark is the way to go.And now that dual-cores are out,even Nenamark1 will be crap and we'll begin to use Nenamark2.Not to mention And3DBenchXL,GLBenchmark and the likes.
Tegra got smoked
http://androidcommunity.com/galaxy-s-iii-quad-core-benchmarks-blow-us-away-20120503/
Hm.. Tegra 3 seems to win the GPU bench?
Quadrant sucks though. Will be waiting for more benchs.
Here are some other benchmarks (next to quandrant also SunSpider and browsermark)
Quadrant scores -
sgs3
cpu - 12781
memory - 4652
io - 7606
2d - 1000
3d - 2171
total - 5642
S4
cpu - 8505
memory - 7547
io - 6394
2d - 990
3d - 2204
total - 5128
tegra3
cpu - 12493
memory - 3472
io - 4769
2d - 962
3d - 2346
total - 4804
they seem pretty even in cpu/gpu capability. the s4 gets smoked in cpu performance according to those quadrant scores. interesting.. i thought it was faster.
Wow, the S3 doesn't seem to smoke the competition.
im interested about the antutu...can someone bring some more benchmarks?
Even if Tegra got smoked games will look better, so i'm really thinking how the S3 will be better in general use except for benchmarks...
Sent from my Quad Core Monster the HTC One X using Tapatalk v 2
GPU performance gap between Tegra3 and Exynos4 Quad is huge
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5810/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-performance-preview
Faster than iPhone4S' powervr sgx543mp2
LOL quadrant sucks so hard. the new mali 400 is killing tegra 3. according to http://www.anandtech.com/show/5810/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-performance-preview
The benchmarked result http://www.icsforums.com/news/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-gets-benchmarked-shows-plenty-promise.html
bocautrang.pt said:
The benchmarked result http://www.icsforums.com/news/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-gets-benchmarked-shows-plenty-promise.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
um no
That's stolen straight out of engadget and they have recorded the lowest performance out of any of these tech blog/news sites
Antutu Benchmark available here:
ph00ny said:
um no
That's stolen straight out of engadget and they have recorded the lowest performance out of any of these tech blog/news sites
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In the video above it's got 5324 Quadrant and 11492 Antutu. Not much different from HOX.
Here are some results from the Swedish androidsite "Swedroid". It's in swedish (doh!) but you should be able to look thru the scores anyway
http://www.swedroid.se/hands-on-med-samsung-galaxy-s-iii-forhandsitt/#disqus_thread
In my humble opinion. To say that the exynos "kills" the Tegra 3 is just...plain...wrong.
They seem to be very capable CPUs in both of these beasts!
umd said:
In the video above it's got 5324 Quadrant and 11492 Antutu. Not much different from HOX.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you see the gpu scores. Kills tegra 3.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Imo they are very close to eachother, i would say exynos wins by a little margin could be just the software dragging it down, would love to see a pure ICS build doing the test.
Benchmarks mean squat.. it comes down to user experience.. if u can really feel the difference.. also, apps need to be fine tuned for quad core too.. so I guess u won't feel an actual difference..
Sent from my HTC One X using XDA
jits1988 said:
Benchmarks mean squat.. it comes down to user experience.. if u can really feel the difference.. also, apps need to be fine tuned for quad core too.. so I guess u won't feel an actual difference..
Sent from my HTC One X using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
good benchmark do shows the raw power of the mobile, its never meant to test the user experience.
jits1988 said:
Benchmarks mean squat.. it comes down to user experience.. if u can really feel the difference.. also, apps need to be fine tuned for quad core too.. so I guess u won't feel an actual difference..
Sent from my HTC One X using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All the hands-on video clip made it seemed as if s3 is doing great in general ui transitions. It was noticeably quicker when used side by side.
Always astounds me how people are judging by benchmarks. I mean, its a phone, not a server station.
I wont be running virtual machines for rendering movies on it. I wont be playing Crysis 3 on it.
I`ll phone, message, watch clips, pictures, surf and use navigation. Even the single core phones can do that perfectly.
How does this tablet stack up on benchmarks?
KShion619 said:
How does this tablet stack up on benchmarks?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would guess similar to the tf300.
fixyourtech said:
I would guess similar to the tf300.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the second thought, i was thinking about buying it then i noticed there wasn't any benchmark scores (From Tablet Gamer)
Benchmarks are by no means a good way to decide on what to buy. Some benchmarks are not fully optimised for some devices giving them wrong scores. The best comparison is just to use a device and see if it works for you.
Well that's just my opinion
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
I agree, benchmarks are very subjective tests of a tablets ability, but AnandTech has many benchmarks in their review.
anandtech. com/show/6054/google-nexus-7-mini-review
(Still new and can't post real link :crying
about 3500 on quadrant with stock from, 14k + CPU score
foxorroxors said:
about 3500 on quadrant with stock from, 14k + CPU score
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant is probably the most unrealiable benchmark of them all, it's a bit outdated and doesn't even support some CPU's. AnTuTu is probably the best one out there as it is constantly updated.
lhayati said:
Quadrant is probably the most unrealiable benchmark of them all, it's a bit outdated and doesn't even support some CPU's. AnTuTu is probably the best one out there as it is constantly updated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
only program I've seen that they have used.... that's why I said it
http://blog.gsmarena.com/google-nexus-7-gets-benchmarked-results-are-unsurprisingly-good/
benchmarks on this page.
http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/28/nexus-7-early-benchmarks/
http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/28/nexus-7-review/
This is a benchmark from Engadget. I do agree that these tests are not the best example of performance, however they are a standard comparison mark. Hope this helps.
Sent from my MB855 using xda app-developers app
Heard some reports from a tech site that while playing a game at high quality the performance on this tablet tanked so they had to lower the settings to alleviate the issue. Really worried about this since if the cpu is not up to snugg i might as well get the nexus 4?
Fasty12 said:
Heard some reports from a tech site that while playing a game at high quality the performance on this tablet tanked so they had to lower the settings to alleviate the issue. Really worried about this since if the cpu is not up to snugg i might as well get the nexus 4?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The CPU is very good. The GPU is the best GPU on Android currently but that huge resolution is pulling FPS down.
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app
Well, it destroys the Tegra 3, that is for sure. But yeah, it's that resolution. It's supposed to be able to handle it, but obviously it won't do it as well as if it were lower.
Also take into account that all the reviews are not running the same thing the one we will purchase. Google has made this clear. Things like miracast and multiple users are not there as of right now and some performance will be ironed out b4 release.
kaspar737 said:
The CPU is very good. The GPU is the best GPU on Android currently but that huge resolution is pulling FPS down.
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
do you think game devs will give the option to run the game at a lower resolution to get better FPS? Seems like it'd be worth it to run a game @ 1080p and gain some performance.
keenraven said:
do you think game devs will give the option to run the game at a lower resolution to get better FPS? Seems like it'd be worth it to run a game @ 1080p and gain some performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well Gameloft said they will optimise their games for Nexus 10 display. I have no idea what they meant under that. I hope they can somehow make their games run 1600p native. If not, well 1080p upscaled is still very good.
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app
kaspar737 said:
Well Gameloft said they will optimise their games for Nexus 10 display. I have no idea what they meant under that. I hope they can somehow make their games run 1600p native. If not, well 1080p upscaled is still very good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gameloft did this with NOVA 3 already, presumably to update the textures. As this is not a big job, Gameloft should be able to do the same with their other top games.
(By the way, Nexus 10 supports all of NOVA 3's special effects.)
Fasty12 said:
Heard some reports from a tech site that while playing a game at high quality the performance on this tablet tanked so they had to lower the settings to alleviate the issue. Really worried about this since if the cpu is not up to snugg i might as well get the nexus 4?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Saw in a review (cant remember which one) that although it is faster than the Tegra 3 the multi core of the T3 was better for intensive gaming since it was better at multitasking, I think they had to lower graphics in nova 3 or deadtrigger!
username24 said:
Saw in a review (cant remember which one) that although it is faster than the Tegra 3 the multi core of the T3 was better for intensive gaming since it was better at multitasking, I think they had to lower graphics in nova 3 or deadtrigger!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Games are very GPU based and the multitasking on tegra 3 is crippled by the cheap slow read and write memory
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium