Related
Everything is new on WM7!
http://www.osnews.com/story/22877/Microsoft_Unveils_Windows_Phone_7_Series
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IOTrqlz4jo
If this place is wrong for this.. Im sorry... I would like to share with the friends form xda!
sebastianmc said:
Everything is new on WM7!
http://www.osnews.com/story/22877/Microsoft_Unveils_Windows_Phone_7_Series
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IOTrqlz4jo
If this place is wrong for this.. Im sorry... I would like to share with the friends form xda!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Windows 7, looking forward to it and definitely my next phone will still be a Windows Mobile!
Most people are talking about it in this topic:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=633291
Just wanted to let you know. WP7S FTW!
chongbh said:
Windows 7, looking forward to it and definitely my next phone will still be a Windows Mobile!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeap!! Its not time to change our OS Lets see what HTC will make on wm7. and maybe there will be a new touchFLO..
ATTENTION:
WINDOWS MOBILE 7 SERIES WOULD NOT SUPPORT 'ADOBE FLASH PLAYER'
look in this video and Play It on 02:39:22 and you see it yourself
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/p...eogallery.aspx
arggggg i hate windows
NO TouchFlo on WM7
sebastianmc said:
Yeap!! Its not time to change our OS Lets see what HTC will make on wm7. and maybe there will be a new touchFLO..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as we’ve heard so far, the details we broke in January are spot-on. Much of the interface is very Zune like. As we said then, manufacturers will not be able to make massive modifications to Windows Phone. Microsoft specifically said that things like HTC’s TouchFlo will not exist on Windows Phone.
Just check this out: mobilecrunch first-impressions-windows-mobile-7-now-known-as-windows-phone
turborider said:
ATTENTION:
WINDOWS MOBILE 7 SERIES WOULD NOT SUPPORT 'ADOBE FLASH PLAYER'
look in this video and Play It on 02:39:22 and you see it yourself
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/p...eogallery.aspx
arggggg i hate windows
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but not forever as adobe said they are developing now for wm6.5 and it will be released in the future for wm7 as they hasenot developed a wm7 version yet
hoss_n2 said:
but not forever as adobe said they are developing now for wm6.5 and it will be released in the future for wm7 as they hasenot developed a wm7 version yet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i hope so mate
turborider said:
ATTENTION:
WINDOWS MOBILE 7 SERIES WOULD NOT SUPPORT 'ADOBE FLASH PLAYER'
look in this video and Play It on 02:39:22 and you see it yourself
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/p...eogallery.aspx
arggggg i hate windows
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, Microsoft told us why. Flash on smartphones is EXTREMELY buggy, doesn't always work, and when it did work it wasn't very good quality. The only time it worked reasonably was in Skyfire, and the developers didn't get even the Flash player part from Adobe!! Although, it was nice to have the option, but at least Adobe is trying to improve it to include it with Windows Phones...eventually.
Oh, yes, and the HTC HD2's proccessor DOES support Windows Phone 7, but I don't think it has the required 4-point touch or search button (I suppose we could use the home key...).
Edit: I just found out that the HD2 has the correct minimum resolution for Windows Phone 7, WVGA.
oops, wrong thread, sorry
Really
mpscuba68 said:
As far as we’ve heard so far, the details we broke in January are spot-on. Much of the interface is very Zune like. As we said then, manufacturers will not be able to make massive modifications to Windows Phone. Microsoft specifically said that things like HTC’s TouchFlo will not exist on Windows Phone.
Just check this out: mobilecrunch first-impressions-windows-mobile-7-now-known-as-windows-phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not think it is spot on. Even some things you are saying here are your assumptions, not something MS stated. Where did now MS state specifically that HTC's Touch Flo will not exist on Windows Phone.
From what I see so far, MS has focused on what they will require vendors to provide, not on what they will ban them from providing. According to your logic, anything MS did not explicitly mention in this announcement is "specifically" banned.
http://www.osnews.com/story/22877/Microsoft_Unveils_Windows_Phone_7_Series said:
Screen resolution, aspect ratio, CPU speed, memory, you name it; it's all mandated by Microsoft. Even the button configuration: Start, back, search. That's it. No deviations. Speaking of deviations - no more custom UIs, Microsoft doesn't allow them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There for you...
Fdo35 said:
Well, Microsoft told us why. Flash on smartphones is EXTREMELY buggy, doesn't always work, and when it did work it wasn't very good quality. The only time it worked reasonably was in Skyfire, and the developers didn't get even the Flash player part from Adobe!! Although, it was nice to have the option, but at least Adobe is trying to improve it to include it with Windows Phones...eventually.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is true. The future is HTML5, which is every bit as capable, and more stable, will leave Flash in the dust where it belongs.
What we really should be asking is if these new smartphone platforms will support HTML5 and WebOS.
Flash is dead.
donalgodon said:
This is true. The future is HTML5, which is every bit as capable, and more stable, will leave Flash in the dust where it belongs.
What we really should be asking is if these new smartphone platforms will support HTML5 and WebOS.
Flash is dead.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
definitelly agree, and hope you are right...
donalgodon said:
(...) Flash is dead. (...)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it? Really? As of today? Come on...
Yeah, maybe sometime in the future. As soon as WP7 is ready. Maybe.
But definitely not as of today.
tictac0566 said:
Is it? Really? As of today? Come on...
Yeah, maybe sometime in the future. As soon as WP7 is ready. Maybe.
But definitely not as of today.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not today, but the nails are in the coffin. It won't be long until the rest of the world realizes, but it won't happen until other leaders take the leaps necessary to put other options on the table, and HTML5 support will be a part of MacOS, iPhoneOS, et. al. Steve Jobs has made that clear.
Stability and performance is what we are all after. Say what you want about Apple, but they have a design team that is maverick enough to make the leaps and not worry about legacy support.
We need to begin to make the break away from Flash.
alexsql said:
I do not think it is spot on. Even some things you are saying here are your assumptions, not something MS stated. Where did now MS state specifically that HTC's Touch Flo will not exist on Windows Phone.
From what I see so far, MS has focused on what they will require vendors to provide, not on what they will ban them from providing. According to your logic, anything MS did not explicitly mention in this announcement is "specifically" banned.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, actually a Microsoft person (don't know what he does)
told an Engadget editor that while he was giving him a demo of Windows Phone 7, which was recorded. I think so, that is. It may have been a video from another site or quoted, but I remember Microsoft saying that somewhere.
I know WP7 is going to be GSM-only until next year, but is there any chance of it running on the evo?
Sent from my EVO
Hrshycro said:
I know WP7 is going to be GSM-only until next year, but is there any chance of it running on the evo?
Sent from my EVO
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? You cant search?
To answer you, no. It will pretty much positively never-have-i-ever happen.
Why would you want it to? Lol
Sent from my Evo
Leukay said:
Really? You cant search?
To answer you, no. It will pretty much positively never-have-i-ever happen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, bad day??
To the OP:
In short, no. Micro$oft will charge carriers to load Windows on phones. So without a pre-activated Windows phone, you will not have the correct validation to load WM7 on a non Windows phone. But of course... with money you can do anything. Such as buying Windows Mobile software...then configuring all the hardware...etc etc. But I think you catch my drift. lol Just a big hassle.
You can do it vice versa because Android is open sourced.
mbaseball3 said:
Why would you want it to? Lol
Sent from my Evo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because he's not a hater and choice is always better?
You can get the Zune Home launcher app thing. Makes it very WP7.
actually it most likely will be possible, thing is the radio probably wont work till the cdma version comes out. seeing as it has been ported to the hd2 it seem very possible. android is a great os but if you have a device that allows you to test an other os why not i would love to try wp7 out.
engadget.com/2010/03/28/htc-hd2-gets-early-windows-phone-7-os-port-could-be-released-be/
Most importantly, it would be illegal since you would not have a legit license. There is no retail version of Windows Phone 7 nor will there ever be. It's one thing to use an OEM licence on a phone that already had an authorized OEM license... but it is another thing to use an OEM app on hardware it was not designed for. It would be considered piracy at that point and I doubt this site (or other popular sites) would condone that activity.
Also... if you want to make your EVO crappier, why wait for windows mobile 7 to come out? Just wipe your ass with it.
that endgadget video is sketchy as ****. there was a guy who posted almost identical video of him running iOS on sprint instinct when it first came out. It showed him holding the phone in front of the monitor just like that. In the end it was all faked, dont know why but the guy just disappeared.
so ya, till i see it, i won't believe it. + the OS looks bloated and slow. It will probably drain battery faster and lag/shutter.
well, at least in that case... its running on an intended platform... but yeah, win phone 7 is pretty much done before it starts. I am betting that MS will give up on the phone business after this. Maybe they will sell their employees to Apple. Apple will become the next MS after Android holds its king seat for a year or two.
i know once windows phone 7 comes out im still going to stay on android tho honestly i think wp7 is going to come out good microsoft has been doing pretty good with everything lately, windows 7, ie9 the kin was a fail lol but i think wp7 will be a pretty strong player in the smart phone market and problem is most of you are calling it a piece of **** before using it i think it deserves a chance and if you guys are right and it is **** then i will accept your i told you so's lol
edufur said:
Most importantly, it would be illegal since you would not have a legit license. There is no retail version of Windows Phone 7 nor will there ever be. It's one thing to use an OEM licence on a phone that already had an authorized OEM license... but it is another thing to use an OEM app on hardware it was not designed for. It would be considered piracy at that point and I doubt this site (or other popular sites) would condone that activity.
Also... if you want to make your EVO crappier, why wait for windows mobile 7 to come out? Just wipe your ass with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow fanboy alert. Yeah no one wants to see choice...............also all the sense roms on here are illegal to by the way
edufur said:
Also... if you want to make your EVO crappier, why wait for windows mobile 7 to come out? Just wipe your ass with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol.....that's pretty damn funny.
well regardless of what you android fanboys have to say about windows phone 7, as soon as it get released on sprint with a 4.3 inch screen and some decent hardware i will be switching. I was originally an windows mobile user and made the switch from the tp2 to the evo. I just couldn't pass up on the specs of the EVO and the hd2 wasn't released for anyone but t-mobile. I never thought i would like android but after using it i actually like it alot but with that said i definitely will give windows phone 7 a try before i make a final judgement
BrianDigital said:
wow fanboy alert. Yeah no one wants to see choice...............also all the sense roms on here are illegal to by the way
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly. And when has MS come and knocked your door down for stealing W7...probably never, and have any of their products ever not been cracked or hacked before within a week of them being out...probably not.
I like Android, but it's still a diamond in the rough when compared to iOS. I think WP7 will be a good mid ground for most people. Android is pretty rough (especially without sense) for most non-techy types of people.
They won't sell wp7 as a stand alone so that means its not pirating because they don't sell the software. The software is preloaded into a phone you buy.
I think it would be HTC who we would be pirating....
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Wow... you all don't get it. You didn't really read my post as to what would make it illegal.
First... let me say this. I love Android... and I guess I don't mind being called a fanboy. But before I got my EVO, I stayed true to Windows Mobile for YEARS and shouted about how it was way better than anything out there. So I was an MS fanboy until it just became a reality that MS is filled with idiots who don't know how to develop.
Now.. when it comes to legality of software and licensing....
Windows Mobile comes installed onto many handsets. Those handsets by definition are licensed as OEM. Hacked Windows Mobile ROMS are OEM and when re-used on a Windows Mobile device, it is a gray area that has no illegal definition. But it is because those devices had the OEM license FOR Windows Mobile.
BUT... Android phones NEVER had an OEM license to use Windows Mobile... which makes installation on those phones (assuming someone can figure it out) a technically illegal act. IF, however, MS sold retail versions of just the Windows Mobile software (wont ever happen), then and ONLY then, could you legally install that software on any handset you could force it onto.
As for HTC and sense... and the ROMS that use sense being illegal. On what basis are you saying this? We buy phones that have sense on them. So using a ROM that still has it on there is perfectly fine.
I hope this clears things up...
edufur said:
Wow... you all don't get it. You didn't really read my post as to what would make it illegal.
First... let me say this. I love Android... and I guess I don't mind being called a fanboy. But before I got my EVO, I stayed true to Windows Mobile for YEARS and shouted about how it was way better than anything out there. So I was an MS fanboy until it just became a reality that MS is filled with idiots who don't know how to develop.
Now.. when it comes to legality of software and licensing....
Windows Mobile comes installed onto many handsets. Those handsets by definition are licensed as OEM. Hacked Windows Mobile ROMS are OEM and when re-used on a Windows Mobile device, it is a gray area that has no illegal definition. But it is because those devices had the OEM license FOR Windows Mobile.
BUT... Android phones NEVER had an OEM license to use Windows Mobile... which makes installation on those phones (assuming someone can figure it out) a technically illegal act. IF, however, MS sold retail versions of just the Windows Mobile software (wont ever happen), then and ONLY then, could you legally install that software on any handset you could force it onto.
As for HTC and sense... and the ROMS that use sense being illegal. On what basis are you saying this? We buy phones that have sense on them. So using a ROM that still has it on there is perfectly fine.
I hope this clears things up...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what he means, is android by design and default is an OPEN SOURCE project. (AOSP), which means it can be modified, used, and redistributed (in a nutshell), and Google HAS to release all source codes.
I think we all know WM is NOT open source, everytime WM or a Windows OS gets loaded onto a device/computer, somehow the manufacturer is paying for the OS. (again, in a nutshell)
On the contrary, Sense is HTC proprietary software, and NOT open source.
This is the reason why cyanogen refuses to put anything Sense related into his CM6 roms, because HTC hasnt OFFICIALLY given anyone the rights to modify and/or redistribute its code.
Is it "illegal" (for lack of better term)? Sure the modded Sense roms are..Will HTC out cease and desist letters to anyone here? I can almost guarantee they wont unless someone is profiting from there code. Just my .02 cents
There won't be ports to say, the Motorola Xoom or the HP TouchPad. Let me explain:
1. In it's current state, Windows 8 doesn't support ARM architecture, although it will later, so I suppose this is only a semi-valid point.
2. and 3. Windows 8 isn't open source, so any ports would be illegal and without source, it's basically impossible.
Please don't fill this subsection with questions concerning if it'll ever come to your tablet/phone/etc., because it won't.
your right,I almost forgot about legal stuff! +1 for pointing this out!
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4811/windows-8-tablets-running-on-ti-qualcomm-nvidia-amd-intel-silicon
???????
i guess we can be confident that 1. will happen
NikolaiT said:
There won't be ports to say, the Motorola Xoom or the HP TouchPad. Let me explain:
1. In it's current state, Windows 8 doesn't support ARM architecture, although it will later, so I suppose this is only a semi-valid point.
2. and 3. Windows 8 isn't open source, so any ports would be illegal and without source, it's basically impossible.
Please don't fill this subsection with questions concerning if it'll ever come to your tablet/phone/etc., because it won't.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Microsoft does have Windows 8 running on ARM, the only thing they haven't done is release a dev build. We'll either get it at a later date or we'll have to wait for the beta.
NikolaiT said:
There won't be ports to say, the Motorola Xoom or the HP TouchPad. Let me explain:
1. In it's current state, Windows 8 doesn't support ARM architecture, although it will later, so I suppose this is only a semi-valid point.
2. and 3. Windows 8 isn't open source, so any ports would be illegal and without source, it's basically impossible.
Please don't fill this subsection with questions concerning if it'll ever come to your tablet/phone/etc., because it won't.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not being open source didn't stop the HTC HD2 from recieving Windows Phone 7
Saljen said:
Not being open source didn't stop the HTC HD2 from recieving Windows Phone 7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mobile OSes are less work than a full fledged operating system, plus, you need to consider legality.
Nitro_123 said:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4811/windows-8-tablets-running-on-ti-qualcomm-nvidia-amd-intel-silicon
???????
i guess we can be confident that 1. will happen
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While it will support ARM, I'd say it's doubtful that it would be released on a disk that you could just load onto your existing device, it will probably only come preloaded on devices by OEMs.
Saljen said:
Not being open source didn't stop the HTC HD2 from recieving Windows Phone 7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Traditionally MS haven't been worried about piracy of their mobile OS's. Their mobile OS efforts have mainly been about keeping people in the Windows eco-system, and to a much lesser degree selling licenses for CE to OEMs making embedded devices. In most cases of mobile OS roms being posted, they've just been updated/enhanced roms for existing Windows mobile devices and so haven't really cost sales and have possibly enhanced the ecosystem.
They're generally much much more concerned about piracy of their main OS. It remains to be seen how they will react to people trying port the ARM version of Windows 8, but they could easily react as strongly as they would for a normal x86 windows.
NikolaiT said:
Mobile OSes are less work than a full fledged operating system, plus, you need to consider legality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's never stopped developers from porting anything before...
I think at this point the largest hurdle is getting a build from an ARM dump. And drivers...can't forget about drivers.
NikolaiT said:
Mobile OSes are less work than a full fledged operating system, plus, you need to consider legality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would the legality be an issue? As long as you have a valid licence and key, when it officially becomes for sale, wouldn't it be ok?
dhiral.v said:
Why would the legality be an issue? As long as you have a valid licence and key, when it officially becomes for sale, wouldn't it be ok?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It most likely won't.
ugothakd said:
It most likely won't.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why not?
If you've paid for the license, I am free to put it on which ever device I own be it my laptop, desktop or tablet.
dhiral.v said:
Why not?
If you've paid for the license, I am free to put it on which ever device I own be it my laptop, desktop or tablet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I mean the arm copy...it'll most likely never be sold as a seperate product. Just built in
1. WinMo wasn’t open source either. Unlike WinMo, Windows licenses can be purchased.
2. Considering the fact that Intel and Google are now working together, the likelihood of cross compatible hardware specs are high for both Arm and Intel chips
3. This OS if it stays in close to current form will be a sort of hybrid of mobile/desktop OS. The mobile side will create a need for sideloaded apps, tweaks, reg hacks etc.
4. It is almost certain that Windows Phone will converge with this os down the line and I would argue that this forum has potential to be the most used forum of the site so the earlier the devs get started the better!
TechJunkiesCA said:
4. It is almost certain that Windows Phone will converge with this os down the line and I would argue that this forum has potential to be the most used forum of the site so the earlier the devs get started the better!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This porting work will indeed happen. Just not on this forum aparently/unfortunately. Discussions about illegal software is a far cry from hosting illegal software. Developers often experiment with breaking laws for learning about a system. exe - tutorials about changing esn # with specific notes that you should not do it. It's just an experiment.
My question is it against the rules to discuss or link to other sites that house these ports? It used to be at least overlooked. See example below and there are countless others in the older stuff.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=362344&page=3
In the past XDA was much more loose about this type of stuff and was my first place to look for the dream goal of putting a desktop class OS on a PDA.
ugothakd said:
It most likely won't.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But do you honestly think anyone will care much about it?
Take Mac OS X for instance. It clearly states in the EULA that installing the software on unapproved/non-Mac hardware are illegal, and yet there are tons of people with dedicated forums hacking away at it to make it run on various PC hardwares, and still ongoing for years.
eXecuter.bin said:
But do you honestly think anyone will care much about it?
Take Mac OS X for instance. It clearly states in the EULA that installing the software on unapproved/non-Mac hardware are illegal, and yet there are tons of people with dedicated forums hacking away at it to make it run on various PC hardwares, and still ongoing for years.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good point...people will try. But the bootloaders are most likely different. Maybe devices with hacked bootloaders (captivate) would be possible.
sent from my epic 4g. with the key skips.
You are 100% right NikolaiT...
If you own a valid license it can't be illegal anyways be it ARM version or not.
We'll see how microsoft releases the product and how many different versions there are in what form.
Indeed, i think we need to leave the legalities aside, and use the assumption of....
You have your Legal and valid licence key, this is how you can get it working on x y and Z
Of course, if it is only Sold as OEM then legally you dont have leg to stand on, OEM copies are for the sole use on the hardware in which is was purchased with, i think the licence says it allows a number of hardware upgrades but you are not intitled to rip it off one PC and dump it on another one. (assuming its the same as a Win 7 Licence), yes people do do it, but that doesnt make it legal or condonable, so if thats the case the XDA couldnt allow anything to do with it
But lets say it can be brought as a retail package, then there is nothing to stop us from attempting to install it on anything we like, infact it may even be easier than we think given that MS usually gives a shed load of drivers, the tricky bit will be getting the bootloaders to allow it.
eXecuter.bin said:
But do you honestly think anyone will care much about it?
Take Mac OS X for instance. It clearly states in the EULA that installing the software on unapproved/non-Mac hardware are illegal, and yet there are tons of people with dedicated forums hacking away at it to make it run on various PC hardwares, and still ongoing for years.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Forbidden, not illegal. The EULA doesn't really have any legal basis whatsoever. Apple can deny you support on your product if you break the EULA though.
Hey guys,
Windows 8 Developer Preview has been out for a while, and I really like what it offers... It has both the Windows 7 Phone layout for your start menu (sorta, I can't really explain it, you just have to try it to understand!), and a full windows framework and desktop to run applications. Since it's based off 7, it has a light footprint, and it works not only on x86 & x64, but armv7l aswell.
So I thought: At one time I did something to use my windows drivers on linux... (There wasn't a wifi driver, so I searched around and found a util that could let me do it) So why couldn't someone do it the other way around, for the Atrix? It would be like having Full windows on your phone but scaled down to match screen size, and then when you place it on the webtop, and voila! you get full scaled Windows 8...
I'm not saying that I can do it, but I'm just throwing the idea out there, for those of you who tried 8, you would get what I mean by the start page and full desktop thing, others just read about it!
No. One of the WOA requirements to boot is a locked AND signed bootloader, also there are NO plans to distribute WOA licenses outside of OEMs.
littleemp said:
No. One of the WOA requirements to boot is a locked AND signed bootloader, also there are NO plans to distribute WOA licenses outside of OEMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I read an article on that like 5 minutes before you posted it. There don't have to be plans to release it. At some point its gonna get leaked, and as soon as that happens, devs who have the time and need for 8 will work in it...
That or have you ever tried to install mac os x on a pc? Yea it works they made some
kind of alt bootloader that will load mac bypassing all the requirements... That might happen to android devices....
Alaq said:
Yea I read an article on that like 5 minutes before you posted it. There don't have to be plans to release it. At some point its gonna get leaked, and as soon as that happens, devs who have the time and need for 8 will work in it...
That or have you ever tried to install mac os x on a pc? Yea it works they made some
kind of alt bootloader that will load mac bypassing all the requirements... That might happen to android devices....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Assuming someone manages to get around the technical hurdles, it will still be something akin to piracy to freely distribute WOA without microsoft's consent. This has been discussed a thousand times on different tablet forums and it's the same conclusion everytime, Microsoft has put a bunch of failsafes to stifle development on their own platform let alone porting to others. WOA is going to be much closer to iOS than Windows 7 as far as distribution goes.
The dev preview is for x86 and x86_64 architecture. An ARM build hasn't been released, so there's you're first problem.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
xiontinsu said:
The dev preview is for x86 and x86_64 architecture. An ARM build hasn't been released, so there's you're first problem.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
An ARM build won't be released... That's the problem...
Any one done or know if its possable to get the new windows 8 tablet software running on a nexus 7 ??? Or know a good cheep android tablet that will dual boot it ??? Ty
Only want to have a little mess around with it and see how well it runs with an xbox before wasting money on buying one as already have a few tablets.
cubixgames said:
Any one done or know if its possable to get the new windows 8 tablet software running on a nexus 7 ??? Or know a good cheep android tablet that will dual boot it ??? Ty
Only want to have a little mess around with it and see how well it runs with an xbox before wasting money on buying one as already have a few tablets.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What exactly do you want it to do with an xbox? It does no more than the SmartGlass app for Android can do.
Does a lot more then what smart glass does, music and video sync on the go sync to mobile phone and so on so many ways to link up the device all to work together. Also be nice to have a play with the new setups see how it runs and feels, what they actulay changed and what they just took from the windows 7.5 mobile edition
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Not going to happen for a handful of reasons, not the least of which are it being closed source, no drivers existing for our hardware, too much of a legal liability for anyone who tried, etc.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Not even with as OEM copy of the software. I've seen things
Like the acer tablet on eBay with dual boot android and windows.
Looks like I might just need to invest in a windows tablet as well as my android
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
No no no no no no no no no no
There is another thread that talks about this in VERY DEEP Details..
First there are two versions of windows 8
Windows 8 x86/x64 . Runs on tradition computer cpus
Windws 8 RT .. the tablet version Runs on Arm (TEGRA CPU) Similar to what nexus 7 has..
Windows 8 tradition version. The one you can buy will not run on ARM CPU
Windows RT is A ROM VERSION OF The os. NOT FOR SALE. Its Protected with boot-loader security beyond anything in the past. Beyond that Microsoft says NO.. You can only get this version From Windows 8 DEVICE PRELOADED..
So if you were to get a raw copy .. Making it work would be VERY ILLEGAL..
THE SHORT ANSWER IS Absolutely NO YOU CAN NOT DO IT..
Look for the other thread if you need to know more on the subject...
:cyclops::cyclops:
No, you CAN do it, it's possible. It's just insanely difficult.
There are no drivers. There is no source code. You'll need to write a UEFI bootloader - which is also possible: it was done with HTC HD2.
And don't give me that bull**** about Microsoft suing you - if somebody wants to do this, they'll do it, and no legal department will stop them.
SilverHedgehog said:
No, you CAN do it, it's possible. It's just insanely difficult.
There are no drivers. There is no source code. You'll need to write a UEFI bootloader - which is also possible: it was done with HTC HD2.
And don't give me that bull**** about Microsoft suing you - if somebody wants to do this, they'll do it, and no legal department will stop them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The intellectually dishonest correlation to the HD2 needs to be put out to pasture as it really bears no relevance.
And you're absolutely right... laws don't deter thieves, or anyone else who is determined to act in a particular manner. Anything and everything outside of the law can get rationalized by someone determined to do it. If laws were alone were an adequate deterrent, then there would be no need for punitive measures. In the case of MS, they have a proven track record of aggressively litigating worldwide when it comes to whatever they consider to be their flagship software at that given time. Far from "bull****", it's quantifiable and qualifiable.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
najaboy said:
The intellectually dishonest correlation to the HD2 needs to be put out to pasture as it really bears no relevance.
And you're absolutely right... laws don't deter thieves, or anyone else who is determined to act in a particular manner. Anything and everything outside of the law can get rationalized by someone determined to do it. If laws were alone were an adequate deterrent, then there would be no need for punitive measures. In the case of MS, they have a proven track record of aggressively litigating worldwide when it comes to whatever they consider to be their flagship software at that given time. Far from "bull****", it's quantifiable and qualifiable.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, this time they are making a new bootloader for UEFI to work. Just because it's a phone that used to run Windows doesn't mean that it's any easier.
I just hate that this place keeps telling people that things are impossible. Impossible and very difficult are two different things.
SilverHedgehog said:
No, this time they are making a new bootloader for UEFI to work. Just because it's a phone that used to run Windows doesn't mean that it's any easier.
I just hate that this place keeps telling people that things are impossible. Impossible and very difficult are two different things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't believe it was ever stated to be impossible. At least I know I never termed it that. It is, as I've said, unfeasible for the aforementioned reasons. If someone's determined enough and is able to essentially build a the necessary drivers, bootloader, etc, they would have licked half the problem. The other half being the likely consequence of their endeavour.
The basic Takeaway for anyone sitting bdxdzxxuryack thinking that this is an eventuality is that
V :' dzxzzzsxsrz szr s
S. ent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
Arsenal 'x