Cm7.2 vs aokp m1 vs cm10 - Fascinate General

I've been running cm7.2 happily for a while now until jelly bean beckoned. I just put aokp milestone 1 and am immediately bowled over by the beauty of the latest android os. However, whereas I was getting a quadrant benchmark of 2400 with cm 7.2, now I get under 1000! The ui is smooth and buttery but the benchmarks suck. Has anyone else seen this? I'm considering cm10... How does that do on quadrant? Thanks for any information.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda app-developers app

Well to be honest who cares about benchmarks? They've never been an accurate representation of real world performance, and if it feels smooth then it's fine... I guess if a big number makes you feel better then to each his own, but I couldn't imagine going backwards from jelly bean now. CM10 is awesome, it just has a few minor differences to AOKP but it's really smooth so maybe it might bench better... but I don't know since I don't care about that stuff

Just ignore the benchmarks. Jelly Bean on the Fascinate (especially CM10) is faster than both Ice Cream Sandwich and Gingerbread roms.

Thanks guys.... Agree with that... No going back from jelly bean.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda app-developers app

Palavilli said:
Thanks guys.... Agree with that... No going back from jelly bean.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try hellybean 4.2 its even faster than 4.1.2
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2

Thanks! As a matter of fact I just did that yesterday. Even better and smother and gives close to 1200 score on quadrant. Haven't found a single issue that bothers me! I also do the following for best performance:
1. Minfree memory killer set to optimum
2. Over clock to 1.2hgz
3. CPU governor set to smartassv2 and Zen
All of above with ROM toolbox.
Any other suggestions are welcome.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda app-developers app

Palavilli said:
Thanks! As a matter of fact I just did that yesterday. Even better and smother and gives close to 1200 score on quadrant. Haven't found a single issue that bothers me! I also do the following for best performance:
1. Minfree memory killer set to optimum
2. Over clock to 1.2hgz
3. CPU governor set to smartassv2 and Zen
All of above with ROM toolbox.
Any other suggestions are welcome.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got mines over clocked to 1.4
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2

Yeah I gave benchmarks up long ago if your phone is buttery smooth who cares, 4.2 aokp just came out I recommend it!
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda app-developers app

ConstantHero said:
Yeah I gave benchmarks up long ago if your phone is buttery smooth who cares, 4.2 aokp just came out I recommend it!
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please redirect me to this aokp 4.2 please
Nvm found it just passed it
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2

It's still in the works but Steve did it again!
I500 AOKP 4.2.1 PUB

ConstantHero said:
It's still in the works but Steve did it again!
I500 AOKP 4.2.1 PUB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That reminds me of a Brittany spears song
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2

I'm currently on hellybean 4.2.1 and would like to try out aokp again, but last time I had problems backing up the aokp ROM using my cmw recovery. Does anyone know if there is some incompatibility there, or should it work?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda app-developers app

Just gave it a shot failed generating md5 sum
I-500 AOKP 4.2.1 PUB

Thanks for checking. Wish they'd fix that soon.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda app-developers app

Related

Need a new rom to use!!!

Need a rom to use! I've tried trigger and it wasn't as customizable. I'm currently using cyanogen. Way more customizable but is slower.... I want to use a rom that can get atlest a 20000 benchmark. With these I've only gotten about 13000 -15000. I still want a gingerbread look or above.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Use a different kernel such as glitch.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
mksin11 said:
Need a rom to use! I've tried trigger and it wasn't as customizable. I'm currently using cyanogen. Way more customizable but is slower.... I want to use a rom that can get atlest a 20000 benchmark. With these I've only gotten about 13000 -15000. I still want a gingerbread look or above.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You might give Miui a try it is more customizable than CM. V6 SuperCharger can give a boost in speed.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=991276
ali1276 said:
Use a different kernel such as glitch.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
THANKS MAN
great kernal now.
i reach 2984 benchmark and that just great for me
I think MiUI is the Best Android rom ,I hope you enjoy it.
Try the Bionix v roms, there fast and very stable
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Thanks for the suggestions. I'll try an miui and bionic when I get tired if cyanogenmod. So far so good. Thanks anyway
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
mksin11 said:
Thanks for the suggestions. I'll try an miui and bionic when I get tired if cyanogenmod. So far so good. Thanks anyway
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If your into experimenting Eugene is working on an ICS rom. It is still in Alpha but data works you can make calls receive text. Not recommended for daily use as the camera and GPS don't work as of yet, but if you don't mind being on the bleeding edge its an awesome start.
I found a ics miui and I'm gonna test it when I get home.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1343863
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
mksin11 said:
forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1343863
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats the same theme I had on MIUI 2 days ago as well, its pretty sweet. I switched over to see what the progress was with the ICS rom but that theme and MIUI is very nice as well
I used to be a big benchmark dude, however ive found overclocking cant make up for bloat. Streamline, day to day use ill take snappy over speed, check cpu spy usage, you rarely use 1200 or 1300. the vibrant cpu is just working with what you loaded.
Right now I'm currently using this miui,I forget the name. Using a ice cream sandwich theme.clocked at 1.6 gigahertz. Getting a benchmark of 1760-20000
Sent from my T959 using XDA App
i've been stuck on the Revolution rom and haven't really made any switches since. before that i was on axura 2.2.
---------- Post added at 02:49 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:17 AM ----------
BTW i'm currently waiting for ICS to come out of alpha and then i'll be making the leap to 4.0
I'm liking this miui so far. I'm using lithium 360. With a ice cream sandwich theme. so far so good. A lot better then cyanogenmod.
Sent from my T959 using XDA App
Once it becomes stable and good for daily use, imma use it too
Sent from my T959 using XDA App
mksin11 said:
Once it becomes stable and good for daily use, imma use it too
Sent from my T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
whats wrong with it? use it as my daily driver and its awesome
I use the camera. And it doesn't work. I use it daily
Sent from my T959 using XDA App
Also Bluetooth did not work. They just came out. With alpha 7 and its a big improvement. Still has some bugs though
Sent from my T959 using XDA App
I used to be a big benchmark dude, however ive found overclocking cant make up for bloat. Streamline, day to day use ill take snappy over speed, check cpu spy usage, you rarely use 1200 or 1300. the vibrant cpu is just working with what you loaded.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 Once I found out that you can cheat Quadrant benchmarks about a year ago, I never took much stock in them and have not posted any scores bc I agree with Tibbs, functionality and snappiness are where the payday is at. Anyone can pull a 2500-3000 on Quadrant with a few build.prop and egl edits but if you have constant FC's, then what is the point? I'm using Toxic8 OC'd at 1200 and pull 2100's but I never get FC's and it is a great daily driver.

Quadrant finally updated.. post your scores

This is still laughable to me. Still, quadrant was updated to work well with ICS. This is my score with cm7 gingerbread @1.440 ghz. Why am I above a galaxy nexus? Hmm.. :trollface:
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
RushAOZ said:
This is still laughable to me. Still, quadrant was updated to work well with ICS. This is my score with cm7 gingerbread @1.440 ghz. Why am I above a galaxy nexus? Hmm.. :trollface:
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha your funny here's my galaxy nexus. Try to beat that lol stock rooted with 13.5ghz over clock
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
My t-prime got 4500
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Esteway.619 said:
Hahaha your funny here's my galaxy nexus. Try to beat that lol stock rooted with 13.5ghz over clock
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha what I meant to say is, why am I above a gnex? Oh yea, this benchmark is FLAWED!! lol
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
RushAOZ said:
Haha what I meant to say is, why am I above a gnex? Oh yea, this benchmark is FLAWED!! lol
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
My result with CM9 v2.1, T132-ICS-CM9 Kernel and CPU set to 200-1000 MHz, ondemand: 2257.
Of course the NS can't mess with an GN, but i'm still impressed how much performance you can gain with custom-roms and -kernels.
I'm running gingerbread deck and the matrix kernel with an overclock to 1.2...(not live oc) and got a score of sound 2966. Hopefully the official 4G build gets ics performance up a little more. I find it hard to believe my device on GB out preforms a galaxy nexus by so much...
Lol nice update like how they slapped a galaxy tab score with io hack at top to make this crap look legit.
At least now you can distinguish actual hardware scores from IO.and supports dualcore.
about the only legit thing to go by in this benchmark is the CPU
anyways enough *****ing
here is my score without any io minpluation
on Eugen's speedy 7 1.44/performance/SIO/65FPS refresh
How are you guys viewing your results? Mine tells me that the next update will include the result browser due to different scores in this version?
you have to except the new shady test result message at the end of the test
im sorry, i really couldnt resist. the sight of this thread to me was like a cat sensing catnip
a cm9 kang with trinity t144, at 1.44ghz
Use to get 3000... sad times....
Nexus S (GSM i9020a)
CM9 Kang (Build 6 of 2.1)
Eugene's Kernel (Speedy-7)
OC 800/100 (conservative)
demo23019 said:
Lol nice update like how they slapped a galaxy tab score with io hack at top to make this crap look legit.
even gpu score is whacked considering GN has same sgx540 with a higher clock
yet the stock NS GPU scores higher
At least now you can distinguish actual hardware scores from IO.and supports dualcore.
about the only legit thing to go by in this benchmark is the CPU
anyways enough *****ing
here is my score without any io minpluation
on Eugen's speedy 7 1.44/performance/SIO/65FPS refresh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you forget the galaxy nexus has a lot more pixels to push.....
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Rem3Dy said:
you forget the galaxy nexus has a lot more pixels to push.....
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very true. More than 2.5 times the Res.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
The power vr540 is a beast.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Sgx540*
Sorry, I'm drunk.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Rem3Dy said:
you forget the galaxy nexus has a lot more pixels to push.....
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup you're right forgot about that
What the heck? I am getting better scores with Trintity(880/220, conservative) than SG's kernel(1100/200, performance).
SG's kernel
Trintity
I know that benchmark is nothing but still it is weird.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
ljordan2 said:
What the heck? I am getting better scores with Trintity(880/220, conservative) than SG's kernel(1100/200, performance).
SG's kernel
View attachment 901627
Trintity
View attachment 901628
I know that benchmark is nothing but still it is weird.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So did I, never could determine why...
ljordan2 said:
What the heck? I am getting better scores with Trintity(880/220, conservative) than SG's kernel(1100/200, performance).
SG's kernel
View attachment 901627
Trintity
View attachment 901628
I know that benchmark is nothing but still it is weird.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kooskoos1814 said:
So did I, never could determine why...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont let the 880mhz in trinity teuv fool you, its as fast as many 1.2ghz kernels.

AOKP or CM9: Which do you prefer?

I personally have been enjoying AOKP due to the incredible amount of *functional* customization options.
Just wanted to see what everyone is preferring nowadays!
Cm9. For me, it just works.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Cm9.. its stable.. just sayin. =]
That and there are themes for it =P... just messing but I prefer cm9 just because it seems to work smoother than aokp. I just didn't like aokp unstability and constant lock ups that I was experiencing. Nothing against it just wasn't my cup of tea.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
AOKP has more options and better battery life.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Big Goron said:
Cm9.. its stable.. just sayin. =]
That and there are themes for it =P... just messing but I prefer cm9 just because it seems to work smoother than aokp. I just didn't like aokp unstability and constant lock ups that I was experiencing. Nothing against it just wasn't my cup of tea.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lock ups? Interesting, I've been steam rolling through aokp like butter
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
At this moment, AOKP is better but CM9 has much more potential.
I run em both for about a week after each update, but battery life is more important to me than all that speed you kids like. AOKP for now.
Sent from my Kindle Fire using xda premium
I Run CM7 but gotta give it to CM9 more supported
AOKP has been preforming wonderfully for me. Battery life is a big thing and AOKP seems to have an edge on my phone anyways.
I do like the fact that CM9 is more supported, but I will definitely agree with kenny that AOKP battery life is excellent. I don't have my screen on for more than an hour a day usually, so with the combination of that and the ability to disable data (where I work I get no 3G, eats my battery up) has provided me with more than ample battery life.
I really need to get back into development. Things now are WAY different than before; it seems like there is more of an opportunity to work on a variety of projects, which I like.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
CM9 for me....
AOKP for me.had an all day meeting at a location with horrible signal and I walked out with 60% battery left.at work where there's a tower half a mile down the road I can't go five hours without plugging my phone in our it's dead on CM9
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA
sigh-AN-o-jen-mod all the way.
I dont think I mind a small penis I still wish my I wife didn't have one though
For those who prefer aokp, can you explain the benefits other than better battery life? Running cm9 now, but very curious about aokp.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA
thomasskull666 said:
I really need to get back into development. Things now are WAY different than before; it seems like there is more of an opportunity to work on a variety of projects, which I like.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
new COLONEL coming soon ?!?!?!?
muyoso said:
For those who prefer aokp, can you explain the benefits other than better battery life? Running cm9 now, but very curious about aokp.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A lot more customization options including clock placement, color, all sorts of extras in ROM Control.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
I am really digging AOKP.
I would say more, but sufficient to say: AOKP kicks ass. (CM9 also kicks ass, just for the record.)
mucus_android said:
I am really digging AOKP.
I would say more, but sufficient to say: AOKP kicks ass. (CM9 also kicks ass, just for the record.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
None of these Kangs would be possible without the CM9 team so big thanks to them. With that said AOKP is CM9 +, everything CM9 is and more except the missing 4G in the pulldown. The 4G widget needs to be used or turning it on in settings.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
absolutely!
Infact I am enjoying AOKP so much that I went and donated to all the devs involved, including the cm team.
Thanks to everyone who makes this amazing stuff possible!
AOKP. Although CM9 is just as good, AOKP just has something to it. Brand-name I guess.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium

[TEST] increase response time

I tried it and no idea if it's placebo effect or its actually faster.
You need root
This will use a bit more of your battery
You can remove it
Use the apk
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1987032
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk 2
There is an update to the apk today. I'm using it but still testing. Thanks for the referral X.
I glanced through the op, what is the other two dl's?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Thanks X, but unfortunately it seems like it's placebo effect http://www.xda-developers.com/android/entropy-seed-generator-not-all-its-hacked-up-to-be/ I ran it last night to no benefit.
Dougfresh said:
Thanks X, but unfortunately it seems like it's placebo effect http://www.xda-developers.com/android/entropy-seed-generator-not-all-its-hacked-up-to-be/ I ran it last night to no benefit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
XDA guys wrote that "article" too soon.
There hasn't been enough tests.
Google dev has said that this provides NOTICEABLE difference for anyone under ICS.
And Steve (CM guy) posted this
So there is something going on.
If someone else still wants to try it out:
http://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/15yldq/ive_made_a_flashable_zip_that_should_greatly/
Flash the zip from there, its battery-saving with the same results + theres a undo flashable zip.
Yo x,what rom are you using now?
Sent from my GT-P5113 using xda premium
samsgun357 said:
Yo x,what rom are you using now?
Sent from my GT-P5113 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Switching around Slim and Helly.
On Helly right now, I wanted the new Chronus clock
SB B2 is probably dropping today Sat. or Sun. and it's a monster...... 100% functioning GPS and extra butter :sly:
Sent from a 959 Slim Bean 4.2 Beta2..................
Dougfresh said:
SB B2 is probably dropping today Sat. or Sun. and it's a monster...... 100% functioning GPS and extra butter :sly:
Sent from a 959 Slim Bean 4.2 Beta2..................
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
..DAMN IT..
just switched from Slim because it didnt have all these new features...

My 4.2.2 Kernel/Rom Benchmark thread

Sup guys, going to be making a comparison between different kernels running on different roms. I know that some of you are going to go on about how benchmarks don't mean anything, if that's you then simply disregard this post.
All roms will be tested with nothing except Gapps (not signed in), Titanium Backup and AnTuTu installed, TB and everything else will be closed before the benchmark.
3 benchmarks will be done, and I will post the average total score.
PAC-ROM
First of is PAC-rom (v20.0.0), by the developer aways who has been making a huge impact on the i9000 rom scene with numerous different roms.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2170768
Stock Kernel (I believe this is stock CM10.1 kernel, with lower total ram than all the other kernels, BM is NOT enabled):
Average is 3837
Test 1
Test 2
Test 3
Fishears LVM 1/03/2013:
Average is 3902
Click here
Stay tuned... more kernels and roms coming soon.
which is best rom
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Well that depends, what would be the use that you're planning for your smartphone?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
my tip
casileon said:
Well that depends, what would be the use that you're planning for your smartphone?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use this http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2075637 with 410MB RAM.
I am very satisfied. Follow the instructions and you will not regret it.
AW: My 4.2.2 Kernel/Rom Benchmark thread
I get higher score with nolvm fishears around 4400
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
CM 10.1 with Semaphore kernel, Bigmem not enabled, OC 110% and I got 5140.
My average score is 2200 on Antutu benchmark.
Galaxy S I9000
Slim_Bean 2.5
Semaphore_JB_2.9.15s
CPU: 1000 Mhz
k4mi1o0 said:
CM 10.1 with Semaphore kernel, Bigmem not enabled, OC 110% and I got 5140.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How did you get that? Mine only 4k++ with almost same setting with yours.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk 2
tiger bean good rom :good:
HellyBean 0323 based on CM10.1
Devil Kernel 4.2 0204
Live OC 120%
CPU 1440 MHz
chatlaxs said:
tiger bean good rom :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes im using it two days and very impressed its the fastest and lightest Rom ive used on a S1
Supernexus GT-I9000
WebMonster21 said:
Yes im using it two days and very impressed its the fastest and lightest Rom ive used on a S1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can I do it?

Categories

Resources