Database Users

[Q] Android 3.0 on Xperia X8?

I have heard that some guys managed to port Android 3.0, better known as Honeycomb, to the G1, HTC Magic and to the Nexus One.
This are of course very beta versions, but the phones boot with it.
So, I wonder if someone could port 3.0 to our Xperia?
The HTC Magic and G1 were the first phones with Android, so our Xperia must be much better than them and, theoratically, it could work on it with just fewer lags than on the G1.
There are so many 2.2 and 2.3 ROMs available for our Xperia, so why not try to port 3.0?
If you think this is a stupid thread, just remove it, but I just wanted to know it.
Thanks in advance for your answers.

USE SEARCH FEATURE ON XDA AND YOU WILL FIND IT. Don't be lazy

You must be new here!

you will get burned at the stake by the guys here for opening such thread xD we are struggling to get a 100% bugless working android 2.2 and you bringing up android 3.0 which is meant for tablets with big screens xD lol
Edit : also such question is not meant to be in the dev section....

It was just a noob question...I also said that the versions for Nexus One, G1 and Magic are very beta versions.

There used to be an early version of Honeycomb somewhere here but the project has been abandoned. And no wonder - our kernel cannot even run Gingerbread without bugs, not to mention higher versions...

Even the kernel supports it, maybe phone will be too much laggy, as the HoneyComb suggests the need of 1.0Ghz processor, that is not our Case

So why they can run it on G1?
Does it have an unlocked bootloader, so you can flash a custom kernel?

codfreak said:
So why they can run it on G1?
Does it have an unlocked bootloader, so you can flash a custom kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably yes, Xperia stills locked and cannot boot custom kernels
Some dev are trying to make the bootloader bypass, but is not easy. :/

biscoitu said:
Probably yes, Xperia stills locked and cannot boot custom kernels
Some dev are trying to make the bootloader bypass, but is not easy. :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not easy and i think they already gave up

Graveir and aldee_s are right: someone has already ported it, but development is currently down.
here is the thread to it:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=982384&highlight=honeycomb

Blagus was disappointed with that, the only one that i saw making some progress was maxfron, but I didn´t saw him anymore

That had it ported but far to laggy m8 r CPU 2 slow at the min but I think I may still have that download ill cheack for u and upload it if so
my civic

Is because our phone is not ARMv7 & above and the processor speed is not super fast..if u port it into x8 it will buggy & lags in all of the function

Lets wait for 2. 4 but google need so much time : #
Sent from my X8 using XDA Premium App

There are already a few phones with Android 2.4 (not for sale, but someone somehow managed to get some)
Here is a youtube video, where you can see Xperia arc running 2.4:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYbBQMERacQ

codfreak said:
There are already a few phones with Android 2.4 (not for sale, but someone somehow managed to get some)
Here is a youtube video, where you can see Xperia arc running 2.4:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYbBQMERacQ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is fake he just editted the build.prob file!
Sent from my X8 using XDA Premium App

You can edit this in build.prop?
Do you mean the line:
Code:
ro.build.version.sdk=8
, so you would only have to change the number?

I think new Android will be 4.0 "Ice Cream Sandwich"
Not 2.4
Sent from my X8 using Tapatalk

your new here arent ya? hahaha! its not very impossible to port 3.0 in our x8 just wait and see

[Gen8] ICS on Gen8 (A70S) preview

Hi All,
Here is a quick preview of my first ICS build running on my A70S:
It's smoother than my initial run, I figured that 3D drivers were not kicked in when I made the comment on my other thread.
It's quite smooth even though there is some slowness from time to time. As it is, it's not usable, there are some crashes because network and sound are not working, but it's quite encouraging.
I may focus on Gen8 more than Gen9 finally as Gen9 will have Archos upgrade. Currently, only 3D and touchscreen are working... Don't expect much, I don't have enough time to work on this to make significant progress quickly.

Great...finally is something!!!
I you want some help, tell me....ok?

Looks great, that launcher is really smooth and it looks like a completely new OS.
Is there any chance that other talented developers working on the Archos will also jump on this with you? $aur0n, divx118, chulri?

God i cant wait for this give me wifi and i will be happy whats ram usage like?

for the buzz
http://www.jbmm.fr/?p=24894

Well, as expected, ram usage is sky high but it's almost untuned... I don't know yet if we can make progress regarding this.
I want first to have wifi and audio working, it should give enough stability to start playing with it. Then, todo list is huge...
Things that are going to be difficult is hdmi, ics doesn't like much the current clone model, and supporting other tablets as kernel changes are required for touch screen.
We'll see... Too bad that I have a job

Awesome!
Great work man! Looking forward to a full release_
-------------------------------
Sent from my HTC Desire S

YES!
This... Is amazing.. I never thought I'd see the day where even Honeycomb was running on the tablet. I really hope the main devs here see this and maybe combine. It's awesome having such a fine-tuned and packed UrukDroid, and it's pretty great finally seeing Gingerbread on our devices, but I think this is the true goal now!.. But that's just me

Hey letama,
now i know what you meant with good news coming...
letama said:
It's smoother than my initial run, I figured that 3D drivers were not kicked in when I made the comment on my other thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you tell, which driver set you integrated?
I also searched for ICS distributions for OMAP3630 base devices.
Couldn't find any 3D libraries yet...
letama said:
It's quite smooth even though there is some slowness from time to time. As it is, it's not usable, there are some crashes because network and sound are not working, but it's quite encouraging.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Am i right by assuming you used the 2.6.35 kernel sources?
I guess we'll need some efforts in the drivers, especially the tiwlan stuff, which should be build externally.
letama said:
I may focus on Gen8 more than Gen9 finally as Gen9 will have Archos upgrade. Currently, only 3D and touchscreen are working... Don't expect much, I don't have enough time to work on this to make significant progress quickly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a start... and a pretty amazing one!!!
Hopefully i'll find some time the next weeks to look into the kernel sources more intensely.
Anyway, it will be no easy task to add the missing parts.
For the HDMI i guess there is a dead end, because there's still one proprietary module which might not work with newer kernel.
Maybe it could work on top of the GPL'ed parts which where published and might get compiled for newer kernel.
But who cares now...
Really impressive work!!!
Congratulations and best regards,
scholbert

Can you upload the rom just for testing features of ics ? It looks very good, great job !

Hi Scholbert!
scholbert said:
now i know what you meant with good news coming...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
scholbert said:
Could you tell, which driver set you integrated?
I also searched for ICS distributions for OMAP3630 base devices.
Couldn't find any 3D libraries yet...
Am i right by assuming you used the 2.6.35 kernel sources?
I guess we'll need some efforts in the drivers, especially the tiwlan stuff, which should be build externally.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, in fact, this is 2.6.29 with Archos 3D binaries. ICS is patched to support old drivers, partly the same way it has been done in cm9 for other devices. I didn't test the .35 yet, I suspended my work on it in the middle, I'm not even sure touchscreen was working.
.35 would be good, I'm having few crashes in 3D drivers currently. I'm not sure yet if they're related to memory or bad interaction somewhere, still trying to get audio and wifi first.
Wifi should be relatively easy, i'm not very far. Audio is more complex, I tried simple solutions and it won't cut it, but with TI and Nexus S sources, we should be able to do something. Could take time though.
For the HDMI i guess there is a dead end, because there's still one proprietary module which might not work with newer kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, with the new A70s coming with Honeycomb, we may be able to steal some binaries for 2.6.35 (or even 3.0 if Archos upgrade them to ICS). They're also 3630, and we should get the kernel source code someday.
scholbert said:
Congratulations and best regards,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!

arkade91 said:
Can you upload the rom just for testing features of ics ? It looks very good, great job !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, as it is, it's not usable. It crashes a lot and you can't do much without network.
I'd like to have at least wifi and if I can sound. Wifi to be able to do something with the tablet, sound because lots of crashes and slowness are coming from missing sound.
If it takes too much time, I'll release it but be warned that it's worthless currently.

letama said:
Well, as it is, it's not usable. It crashes a lot and you can't do much without network.
I'd like to have at least wifi and if I can sound. Wifi to be able to do something with the tablet, sound because lots of crashes and slowness are coming from missing sound.
If it takes too much time, I'll release it but be warned that it's worthless currently.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes you're right, i hoped never get honeycomb or ICS on our tablet... take your time, it's already a very good news that ics running on our old archos gen8 ... THANKS !
Sent from my A101IT using xda premium

Where can I donate?!?
Very good work, I never thought that this would happen.
Honeycomb was not realistic but now I have hope for something better

Thanks GPhenom for thinking about donation, but I can't accept for now, I'm not even sure I'll be able to release something.
We'll see, but there is lots of work before having something usable.

Promising start man! Kudos for getting it running at all
Sent from my openAOS Build of Android 2.3 (cyanogenmod edition) using xda premium

This look cool
Can you make source repo (git) for this please
I would like to build it and test to get wifi and so working
and good work

Cool! Hope to see a first alpha

Sweet, buying a Archos 70 (hopefully Gen8, got to look that up first) today. Just awesome work dude!

AlphaTime said:
Can you make source repo (git) for this please
I would like to build it and test to get wifi and so working
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Take a look here, I'm not having structured git yet...

What's the best thread to follow for CM10 on galaxy note

hey just wondering if anybody would had the best thread to follow for cm 10 on the galaxy note
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

trea916 said:
hey just wondering if anybody would had the best thread to follow for cm 10 on the galaxy note
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah seriously I don't know what's the mystery about it.. Already running cm10 on my gtab and gnexus I know they don't like people ask when their phone will get CMXX. but CM developers should try to communicate better with users... Open source, free work in this scale is not excuse for blindness
Enviado desde mi GT-N7000 usando Tapatalk 2

Maybe it's worth posting a note on the cm forum and getting as many of us to sign it, that's how we got cm9 in the first place. I'm pretty sure they're already working on it.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

Track xplodwild's twitter account. Thats ur best bet.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

Xplodwild does a great job on implementing the s3 cm10 previews. I tested the previews from the beginning. I have now migrated to N7000 and cannot wait for the First previews there.
Gesendet von meinem GT-N7000 mit Tapatalk 2

There will be long wait to have a fully working jellybean on the Note.
Mostly due to Samsung who delays Note updates for newbies critical bugs (ie brick bug) and also to sell the Note 2. Why users will buy Note 2 if they have a fully working ICS/Jellybean on the first one ?
Kernel/FW sources will be released in a long time.
Concerning CM10, hope they will not face issues like working camera etc.
As an example, CM9 & Aokp/Aosp are ready for months on galaxy tab but still missing functionnalities & working camera which make them useless. Cause of no sources available for devs.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

Phenryth said:
There will be long wait to have a fully working jellybean on the Note.
Mostly due to Samsung who delays Note updates for newbies critical bugs (ie brick bug) and also to sell the Note 2. Why users will buy Note 2 if they have a fully working ICS/Jellybean on the first one ?
Kernel/FW sources will be released in a long time.
Concerning CM10, hope they will not face issues like working camera etc.
As an example, CM9 & Aokp/Aosp are ready for months on galaxy tab but still missing functionnalities & working camera which make them useless. Cause of no sources available for devs.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm9 works with 4.0.4 way before samsung releases 4.0.4.. Drivers compatibility its for 4.X.X that's well known.. And cm team several weeks ago (since jb source droped into aosp) started the merge with ics and they said it was a piece of cake since the drivers from ics are the same... We don't need samsung sources to get JB.. Cm can deliver a jb rom with what they already have..
And in the case of gtab 10.1 we don't have working camera because our kernel developer Wich also is the cm9/10 maintainer for tab ported all the drivers from honey comb Wich were a slightly improvement over ginger bread drivers.. That's why we don't have a working camera yet.. But hey everything else works. Hwa/gps/sound/wifi/3G and cm10 its running on the tablet buttery smooth with the lack of camera.. And those are drivers from honey comb..
So tell me what's wrong with cm10 for note when they have every single driver for ics available... Makes no sense to me... Most of the popular phones/tabs cm supports in cm9 already have a cm10 preview
Difference here its that our cm developer I'm gtab is an angel.. What a nice guy he baby every single person that uses cm9 and or his kernels... He takes care of every single case one by one and he didn't move to merging jb until the last of us solved his personal issue...
Pershoot (our cm developer for tab) is not thinking he's a all mighty god untouchable its what he says and everyone else is bull$hit its an attitude problem here
Enviado desde mi GT-N7000 usando Tapatalk 2

trea916 said:
hey just wondering if anybody would had the best thread to follow for cm 10 on the galaxy note
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the cm9 thread for now ....a new thread will be started when the cm crew are happy they can release it and not have a bunch of people going arhh why this dont work why that not work...as umbelievable as it might seem there is a lot of time consuming work and fixes that go into making your new rom..PATIENCE is a vertue ,,whinging is just plain annoying

@denny said:
the cm9 thread for now ....a new thread will be started when the cm crew are happy they can release it and not have a bunch of people going arhh why this dont work why that not work...as umbelievable as it might seem there is a lot of time consuming work and fixes that go into making your new rom..PATIENCE is a vertue ,,whinging is just plain annoying
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This its not true something like this works
ATTENTION: THIS IS JUST A PREVIEW. MAY CONTAIN A LOT OF BUGS!
NO SUPPORT!!!
CyanogenMod is a free, community built, aftermarket firmware distribution of Android 4.1 (JB), which is designed to increase performance and reliability over stock Android for your device.
#include
/*
* Your warranty is now void.
*
* I am not responsible for bricked devices, dead SD cards,
* thermonuclear war, or you getting fired because the alarm app failed. Please
* do some research if you have any concerns about features included in this ROM
* before flashing it! YOU are choosing to make these modifications, and if
* you point the finger at me for messing up your device, I will laugh at you.
*
* Submitting bug reports on nightly builds is the leading
* cause of male impotence.
*/
CyanogenMod is based on the Android Open Source Project with extra contributions from many people within the Android community. It can be used without any need to have any Google application installed. Linked below is a package that has come from another Android project that restore the Google parts. CyanogenMod does still include various hardware-specific code, which is also slowly being open-sourced anyway.
All the source code for CyanogenMod is available in the CyanogenMod Github repo. And if you would like to contribute to CyanogenMod, please visit out Gerrit Code Review. You can also view the Changelog for a full list of changes & features.
First time installing CyanogenMod 10 to your Galaxy S II, or coming from another ROM:
- Make sure you're running a proper working ClockworkMod-Recovery
- Copy GApps and CM10 ZIPs to your internal SDCard
- Boot into Recovery
- Flash CM10 zip from internal SDCard
- Flash GApps zip from internal SDCard
- DO A DATA WIPE / FACTORY RESET (otherwise your device will be stuck at boot)
- Reboot
- Don't restore Apps using Titanium Backup!
Upgrading from earlier version of CyanogenMod 10:
- Copy CM10 ZIP to your internal SDCard
- Boot into Recovery
- Flash CM10 zip from internal SDCard
- Reboot
Experimental builds:
20120725: Download (md5)
20120725 (Mirror): Download (md5)
Google Apps:
Get the latest Version from Rom-Manager.
Newer, unsupported versions can be found at http://goo.im/gapps
CWM flashable Modems:
LPX Modem: Download
LPW Modem: Download
LPS Modem: Download
LPR Modem: Download
Have a look at ROM-Manager (Developer: codeworkx) for more Modems.
Webchat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=teamhacksung-support
Server: chat.freenode.net
Channel: #teamhacksung-support
Don't expect any support if you:
- are not running stock cm-kernel
- have installed any mods
- have modified system files
If you're going to reuse our work, which we're doing for free, be fair and give proper credits.
This is the only payment we're really demanding and we deserve it to be mentioned because of the countless hours we've put into this project.
Open-Source doesn't meant Out-of-Respect!!!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=29280368
If you want to donate a few bucks for the work we're doing in our freetime, goto teamhacksung website and hit the big donate button.
Thanks to all donators!
Enviado desde mi GT-N7000 usando Tapatalk 2

msedek said:
Cm9 works with 4.0.4 way before samsung releases 4.0.4.. Drivers compatibility its for 4.X.X that's well known.. And cm team several weeks ago (since jb source droped into aosp) started the merge with ics and they said it was a piece of cake since the drivers from ics are the same... We don't need samsung sources to get JB.. Cm can deliver a jb rom with what they already have..
And in the case of gtab 10.1 we don't have working camera because our kernel developer Wich also is the cm9/10 maintainer for tab ported all the drivers from honey comb Wich were a slightly improvement over ginger bread drivers.. That's why we don't have a working camera yet.. But hey everything else works. Hwa/gps/sound/wifi/3G and cm10 its running on the tablet buttery smooth with the lack of camera.. And those are drivers from honey comb..
So tell me what's wrong with cm10 for note when they have every single driver for ics available... Makes no sense to me... Most of the popular phones/tabs cm supports in cm9 already have a cm10 preview
Difference here its that our cm developer I'm gtab is an angel.. What a nice guy he baby every single person that uses cm9 and or his kernels... He takes care of every single case one by one and he didn't move to merging jb until the last of us solved his personal issue...
Pershoot (our cm developer for tab) is not thinking he's a all mighty god untouchable its what he says and everyone else is bull$hit its an attitude problem here
Enviado desde mi GT-N7000 usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You just did not understand what i've written.
I am hoping that CM teams won't face these issues like camera even if they should not be concerned.
I am certainly not speaking about their awesome work but about the fact that if issues raise with CM10...it can be hard to fix since Samsung are not going to release the eventual sources needed before months.
Nevertheless, i am running CM9 and I love it. But there are still missing stock functionnalities. It is for users to know if they can live without them or not. Some absolutely need S-suite...other the Mhl...and for me, working camera especially for skype is a must have. That is why I have to run that **** of samsung stock over my gtab 8.9.
I am angry towards Samsung...not towards the different developers teams who litterally save us.
As an example, they fix the emmc brick while Samsung did not do it yet and force most of Note users to remain at Gingerbread..which just innacceptable for the ones who's getting the most money between manufacturers.
I also have the Xperia S...comparing Gb/ICS to samsung stock is just day and night. At the end...comparing to any devices I had/have..Samsung provides the best innovations and hardware but the worst system.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

Phenryth said:
You just did not understand what i've written.
I am hoping that CM teams won't face these issues like camera even if they should not be concerned.
I am certainly not speaking about their awesome work but about the fact that if issues raise with CM10...it can be hard to fix since Samsung are not going to release the eventual sources needed before months.
Nevertheless, i am running CM9 and I love it. But there are still missing stock functionnalities. It is for users to know if they can live without them or not. Some absolutely need S-suite...other the Mhl...and for me, working camera especially for skype is a must have. That is why I have to run that **** of samsung stock over my gtab 8.9.
I am angry towards Samsung...not towards the different developers teams who litterally save us.
As an example, they fix the emmc brick while Samsung did not do it yet and force most of Note users to remain at Gingerbread..which just innacceptable for the ones who's getting the most money between manufacturers.
I also have the Xperia S...comparing Gb/ICS to samsung stock is just day and night. At the end...comparing to any devices I had/have..Samsung provides the best innovations and hardware but the worst system.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have cm10 in all my devices but gnote and I completely love it.. What I don't get its the cm developers attitude here.. Handling people like they are gods and not giving a small preview or a single word about the jb rom
Enviado desde mi GT-N7000 usando Tapatalk 2

Originally Posted by msedek View Post
Cm9 works with 4.0.4 way before samsung releases 4.0.4.. Drivers compatibility its for 4.X.X that's well known.. And cm team several weeks ago (since jb source droped into aosp) started the merge with ics and they said it was a piece of cake since the drivers from ics are the same... We don't need samsung sources to get JB.. Cm can deliver a jb rom with what they already have..
:good: totally agreed with that.
it's depending to Samsung. their to busy making big money instead of customers who facing problem with their own product. working too slow to solve their own problem and not appreciates value customers.
and yes ! i'm totally agreed with you, here Devs making a lots of improvement and modifications just to ensure satisfaction to enjoyed what we all paid of.

lets be patient. Xplodwild will start a new discussion thread once he releases it in the general section here

Phenryth said:
There will be long wait to have a fully working jellybean on the Note.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like a few hours?
(if you don't mind project butter not fully working)

XpLoDWilD said:
Like a few hours?
(if you don't mind project butter not fully working)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nuff said
Enviado desde mi GT-N7000 usando Tapatalk 2

XpLoDWilD said:
Like a few hours?
(if you don't mind project butter not fully working)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Love you, man!
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

XpLoDWilD said:
Like a few hours?
(if you don't mind project butter not fully working)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here's come the legend! RESPECT!
Seriously, we can't wait to test JB in Galaxy Note!

I'll wait for the Butter.

Yeah, we got lucky. Unlike GB audio blobs in ICS, ICS audio blobs worked with a backwards-compatibility wrapper in JB.
I don't think anyone was expecting it to work but it did. I would've started working on the Note tree last night, but I got home late and am away from home almost all day today. xplod will probably have a tree up before I get home, he cheats by being 6 hours ahead of me in timezones!
Due to certain limitations of our graphics blobs, the majority of "butter" will not be present.

Entropy512 said:
Yeah, we got lucky. Unlike GB audio blobs in ICS, ICS audio blobs worked with a backwards-compatibility wrapper in JB.
I don't think anyone was expecting it to work but it did. I would've started working on the Note tree last night, but I got home late and am away from home almost all day today. xplod will probably have a tree up before I get home, he cheats by being 6 hours ahead of me in timezones!
Due to certain limitations of our graphics blobs, the majority of "butter" will not be present.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Out of curiosity, would the limitations be fixable, given time? Or is it just not-fixable and our Notes would forever be dry and crusty, without any butter?

Android Central confirms Sony Nexus?

http://www.theupload.geek.nz/2013/06/tech-nexus-sony-confirmed-for-us.html
Sony Nexus Confirmed for US by Android Central
Is anyone else hoping we will just get given an FTF???

exekias said:
http://www.theupload.geek.nz/2013/06/tech-nexus-sony-confirmed-for-us.html
Sony Nexus Confirmed for US by Android Central
Is anyone else hoping we will just get given an FTF???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM10.1 is already pretty flawless for me
a fully certified working 4.2.2 AOSP would be even better!

spazzy1912 said:
CM10.1 is already pretty flawless for me
a fully certified working 4.2.2 AOSP would be even better!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It works for me to, and I love getting nightlies everyday that improve the odd bug..But to have a 4.2.2 that uses the proper binaries that sony cant release allowing us to have a stock experience and still have good battery and 3d performence and gaples playback etc would greatly help aosp for this rom AND fix some bugs for CM with some backwards engineering

exekias said:
It works for me to, and I love getting nightlies everyday that improve the odd bug..But to have a 4.2.2 that uses the proper binaries that sony cant release allowing us to have a stock experience and still have good battery and 3d performence and gaples playback etc would greatly help aosp for this rom AND fix some bugs for CM with some backwards engineering
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the main reason I'm excited

[evervolv 4.3] Just for fun

Hey guys.
Since 4.3 is out, I wanted to test it on the x10, since my Wiko Peax is based on mediatek chipset and there's no way of building roms.
So there it is. First as a screen shot, but soon a released version.
For now I don't have any sim card to test if it works, but wifi is working. Same WLOD as for the 4.2 versions ... since I'm still using the 2.6.29 kernel.
Don't expect anything fantastic, it's slow, but nevermind, x10 never dies. ^^

scritch007 said:
Hey guys.
Since 4.3 is out, I wanted to test it on the x10, since my Wiko Peax is based on mediatek chipset and there's no way of building roms.
So there it is. First as a screen shot, but soon a released version.
For now I don't have any sim card to test if it works, but wifi is working. Same WLOD as for the 4.2 versions ... since I'm still using the 2.6.29 kernel.
Don't expect anything fantastic, it's slow, but nevermind, x10 never dies. ^^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great news....fantastic
Sent from my X10 using xda premium

WOW THANKS @scritch007 IT'S SO AWESOME !! I WILL FEEDBACK

We missed you and your awesome work, Happy to see you again Scritch.

Great to see that you are still with us
Cant wait to test it. Hopefully tof gives some info regarding the kernel he is working on soon.
Cheers!

Fantastic news
Envoyé depuis mon Xperia X10

Got to fix properly ramdisk, and add recovery and chargermon.
Today I've got to run the famous command that fixes the blinking screen since JB by hand by connecting to adb. So just got to make it clean, and I'll be able to provided the first version. Don't expect this before next Monday. Will only get some time this Week-end

I must admit Android v4.3 on a circa 2009 Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10i, would be quite something for show and tell,
I may even risk my perfect GB v2.3.4 configuration just so I can have a screen shot of Android v4.3 running.
[Update]
I read Android v4.4 is mooted to be released in a couple of weeks (maybe mid October)
Should we skip Android v4.3 and go straight to Android v4.4.....
Wouldn't it be a real wheeze if we got Android v4.4 on our XPERIA X10i before is was available for the XPERIA Z or XPERIA Z1
[crawls back into his box....]