Database Users

[REQUESTS] MODS, HACKS, ROMS, and features you would like to see on SGS3

Since the launch of the phone is eminent - I figured I would set up this thread for people to request features or mods to be included in the ROMs that are developed for this phone.
If you have a MOD or a feature you had on your previous phone and would like to have it ported over to the GSIII please post it here along with a link to the the original MOD.
I look forward to see what the DEV support will be like for this phone.
REQUESTS: (Collected from thread)
MODS / HACKS
- Continuous scrolling in the app drawer can be changed to scroll right into the widgets tab
- Five App Columns in TW
- A circular battery with percentages, with charging animation, kind of like style A at the UOT Kitchen
- Extended power menu
- Extended notification menu
- Fully rotating desktop, like in Andromeda3
- Remove the at&t branding from notification bar
- Port of AOKP
- Free way to tether
- Remove most of the bloatware
- Voodoo sound
- SamsungDive
- LED notification colors can be changed for specific events
- Convenient method for setting brightness
- A stable USB mass storage mode that does not trash your flash/SD memory
- modded email app that will allow administrator-less access to exchange
- Include the AOSP ringtone/notification/alarms/UI audio alongside samsung's "inspired by nature"
- HQ camera - hi res video at 30 fps, quieted shutter, better sound encoding on video, Concert mode for better sound recording
PORTS
- Ezekeel Kernel
- Stock ICS experience - None CM9 - ie GNexus
- Debloated and optimized TW Rom
- AOKP
- Cyanogen Mod 9
- Fireflys Themes
- ParanoidAndroid Hybrid ROM
THEME COLORS
- Charcoal and light blue combination themes, apps, and dialer
- Lime green color, ROM themes, apps and dialer

idk if this is possible but if the continuous scrolling in the app draw can be changed to go right into the widgets tap that would be nice
i understand that there r launchers out there that would do that for me but just to keep TW would be nice

Five app icons on a single row... I know there's a name for it, but I don't remember it.

I would just love for gtg465 to jump on board and make a tw based rom. Totally a elite dev IMO.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium

Hey bro you wanna work on a rom together?
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium

A circular battery with percentages, with charging animation, kind of like style A at the UOT Kitchen
Extended power menu, and extended notification menu
Fully rotating desktop, like in Andromeda3

First things I'd like to see is
Confirmed method to wipe ROM Install counts (Triangle?)
Root, with method for UnRoot
Devil Kernel on this phone
If you couldn't tell, my priority while under warranty time would be a way to restore to default in case of warranty need.

Those items are a given.... Hence what do you want in your ROMs.... My understanding is both triangle away and the use jig still work for resetting Odin count
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

I've been reading quite a bit, and I read the jig works for getting into download, but does not reset count; and I've read that Triangle will need to be modified to work.
Who know which is right?
I'm basing my 'wants' on what I've experienced with an ICS ROM and Kernel on my Captivate.
I'm particularly interested in kernel things such as overclocking; undervolting; possibly Swap/Zram support; and good tools for modifying. As example, this Kernel for AOKP ICS used on Captivate (and others I believe); and this for making mod settings in the Kernel.

Looking forward to AOKP on the S3...personally i think touchwiz is beyond horrible

Think I will give stock TW a run for a little bit since it is getting some great reviews.
However AOKP is a must and I would love to see MikeyMike bring over Serendipity 9 if he goes this route.
As far as a specific thing in a ROM.....I gotta go with AOSP mms and email apps....TW ones really are junk.
Sent from my Galaxy S II - I777

ewingr said:
I've been reading quite a bit, and I read the jig works for getting into download, but does not reset count; and I've read that Triangle will need to be modified to work.
Who know which is right?
I'm basing my 'wants' on what I've experienced with an ICS ROM and Kernel on my Captivate.
I'm particularly interested in kernel things such as overclocking; undervolting; possibly Swap/Zram support; and good tools for modifying. As example, this Kernel for AOKP ICS used on Captivate (and others I believe); and this for making mod settings in the Kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol we won't need swap on this phone. As much as I love the function (and love to brag about it), 2gb of RAM is going to be way way more than enough ;P
Herp derp Captivate Tapatalk 2

neverends said:
Those items are a given.... Hence what do you want in your ROMs.... My understanding is both triangle away and the use jig still work for resetting Odin count
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Highly unlikely. Newer devices (see Galaxy Note and Tab 2) and even newer bootloaders on devices like the SGSII do not allow the jig to work when it comes to resetting the binary counter.
Also Triangle Away DOES NOT work with non Exynos processors which is why it works on the international SGSIII but does not work with the Skyrocket, US Galaxy Note, and most likely not the North American SGSIII. (maybe I'll be proven wrong)
So my vote would be to first find a method of rooting and installing CWM without tripping the counter, similar to some of the great work that the devs on the US Galaxy Note have done recently.
Sent from my GT-P3113 using Tapatalk 2

radio firmware for the HSPA + 42 supported by the S4 on the At&t version and radio firmware for LTE on the T-mobile version.

When I can get a hold of firmware I can get u guys full rotating desktop and advanced power menu... As well as 360 rotation on lock? Anywhere I could pickup framework
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda premium

pizz0wn3d said:
Lol we won't need swap on this phone. As much as I love the function (and love to brag about it), 2gb of RAM is going to be way way more than enough ;P
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sure hoping that is the case...
pinoymutt said:
Highly unlikely. Newer devices (see Galaxy Note and Tab 2) and even newer bootloaders on devices like the SGSII do not allow the jig to work when it comes to resetting the binary counter.
Also Triangle Away DOES NOT work with non Exynos processors which is why it works on the international SGSIII but does not work with the Skyrocket, US Galaxy Note, and most likely not the North American SGSIII. (maybe I'll be proven wrong)
So my vote would be to first find a method of rooting and installing CWM without tripping the counter, similar to some of the great work that the devs on the US Galaxy Note have done recently.
Sent from my GT-P3113 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1

pinoymutt said:
Highly unlikely. Newer devices (see Galaxy Note and Tab 2) and even newer bootloaders on devices like the SGSII do not allow the jig to work when it comes to resetting the binary counter.
Also Triangle Away DOES NOT work with non Exynos processors which is why it works on the international SGSIII but does not work with the Skyrocket, US Galaxy Note, and most likely not the North American SGSIII. (maybe I'll be proven wrong)
So my vote would be to first find a method of rooting and installing CWM without tripping the counter, similar to some of the great work that the devs on the US Galaxy Note have done recently.
Sent from my GT-P3113 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have to admire your tenacity ... did you search for all my posts and decide to "warn" people about the risks of odin and the jig issue. I am sure it is appreciated by those who are here because they want to make their phone cool. Please remember that this is a DEVELOPERS forum which implies that the people here are aware that making modifications to your phone will void their warranty.
With that being said... in the other thread you mentioned that people are putting your posts down... this could be because you are posting the same information in every single forum and thread.
You made a post about the dangers of ODIN in the Development forum... even though this post had no development use and should have been in the general section... further you posted the info in the ODIN forum and this MODs/HACKS thread...
We got it - installing ODIN on your computer will void your phone warranty. I have gladly added a warning to my ODIN thread in the hopes of Warning people and I gave you the credit for the info... let's stop cluttering the forums and stealing threads...

I would absolutely love to have one of the first phones to run Android 4.1 aka Jelly Bean. Just because.

rjyanj said:
I would absolutely love to have one of the first phones to run Android 4.1 aka Jelly Bean. Just because.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which is why I'm still keeping my Nexus...its gonna be the first Jelly Bean phone

A stable USB mass storage mode that does not trash your flash/SD memory would be nice.

Looking For Tablet ROM With More Complete S-Pen Support

Hello. I have written an app that helps to improve the accuracy of the S-Pen. It works only on Note phones because Samsung has compiled some S-Pen device driver interfaces out of the tablet ROMs. It is not clear why they did this. I have asked Samsung but gotten no replies. I have confirmed that parts of the kernel code is commented out in the open source kernel code (and you can see that some of the interface files found on phones do not exist on the tablets). It seems that the tablets suffer from the same issues related to the S-Pen as do the phones and I have many people asking me to make my app work on their tablets. I cannot do so with the stock ROMs because of the missing interface files.
So I am wondering if there any non-stock ROMs in which the S-Pen is more fully supported. The missing files are located on my phone in /sys/class/sec/sec_epen/ and the two files I need are called epen_hand and epen_rotation. If anyone knows of any ROMs for the S-Pen equipped tablets that provide these interface files, I would appreciate knowing and may be able to direct some folks to using them.
Thanks

I can confirm that neither are present in Baked build 8, it might be worth checking a dump from the note 8.0
Regards
Jack

JSale said:
I can confirm that neither are present in Baked build 8, it might be worth checking a dump from the note 8.0
Regards
Jack
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jack, some replies to postings in the Note 8 section indicate that the two files are present on the stock ROM there. Interesting... I am downloading a dump of the 10.1 now to see if I can see anything. Thanks

Any progress on this? It looks quite promising in the note 8.0 forums.
Regards
Jack

whitedavidp said:
I have confirmed that parts of the kernel code is commented out in the open source kernel code (and you can see that some of the interface files found on phones do not exist on the tablets). ... The missing files are located on my phone in /sys/class/sec/sec_epen/ and the two files I need are called epen_hand and epen_rotation ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, since this is presumably a kernel issue, I'll look into it (PM me with your E-mail address) and IF there's anything that can be done about it (i.e., if the corresponding actions are available in the pen driver; it's not enough to just be able to integrate the sysfs entries) I'll add it into the kernels I release for the Note 10.1

kcrudup said:
Well, since this is presumably a kernel issue, I'll look into it (PM me with your E-mail address) and IF there's anything that can be done about it (i.e., if the corresponding actions are available in the pen driver; it's not enough to just be able to integrate the sysfs entries) I'll add it into the kernels I release for the Note 10.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello and thanks for responding/helping out. I am certainly no kernel programmer. But I have downloaded the kernel sources for a couple official Note devices/versions. I have been reading files located in kernel/drivers/input/touchscreen/wacom paying particular attention to the file wacom_i2c.c. I cannot help but note that some of the functions which appear to reference the driver i/o files that are missing are #def'ed out of certain devices - see line 837 #if defined(CONFIG_MACH_P4NOTE).
I have no idea if the Wacom devices used in the various Note models are the same (except for size) or are similar enough to be treated as the same by programs like mine. Heck, I am not even sure if Wacom devices are being used in all the Note models. So I am afraid I am not much in the way of technical help here.
What I do know is that some custom ROMs for Note I and II phones seem to have been created with drivers that DO support and create the needed driver i/o files but which lack the device settings and other mechanisms which actually take advantage of these i/o files. Basically, they do not offer a dominant hand setting nor do they seem to communicate to the Wacom device when an orientation change is detected. I have been able, through my app, to compensate for these lapses on those devices and thereby improve the SPen's accuracy.
I have had users wanting to get the same effect on Note tablets with my app. So I presume they are experiencing the same type of problem on their tablets that I experienced on my Note I phone that led me to get into all of this. But I know that my app cannot help them unless the i/o files are there.
I was surprised to hear, over in the Note 8 forum that the files do exist on those devices. I know from a tester that my app at least runs on the Note 8. But I don't know if it helps any since that tester was not seeing the problem my app is designed to fix. But I read here that the files are not on the larger Note tablets. I don't know why and have asked Samsung and get basically no answer. My underlying assumption is that the Wacom devices are basically the same but I cannot answer why Samsung treats them as different.
I am sure all of this doesn't help much. Sorry. All I would like to do is try to find a way to offer support to the tablet users who want it.
Cheers!

Try this kernel: http://goo.gl/OBJ4O (PM also sent).

kcrudup said:
Try this kernel: http://goo.gl/OBJ4O (PM also sent).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im going to quickly revert from baked to android revolution to test this
I will let you know what I think.
Regards
Jack

JSale said:
I'm going to quickly revert from baked to android revolution to test this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, this is just a kernel- you won't have to change distributions to try this.

kcrudup said:
No, this is just a kernel- you won't have to change distributions to try this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But baked is based on CyanogenMod, unless this kernel is compatible?

kcrudup said:
Try this kernel: http://goo.gl/OBJ4O (PM also sent).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sadly, I don't own one of these tablets (yet). But I have passed this on to a user who previously asked me (and got this thread rolling as a result). So perhaps he can check it out and try my app on it. If he does, I will certainly report back here. Thanks for your efforts.

JSale said:
But baked is based on CyanogenMod
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, then yeah- as I suspect CM won't have any of the SPen goodies. My bad.
In any case, let me know. It was a very trivial fix and didn't appear to break anything. I don't use the SPen much at all, but a quick test with SNote appears that everything still seems to work OK.
(But I did notice that the stock Samsung ROM (CMD2) does set these variables, which is unusual as these sysfs entries "shouldn't exist", but it seemed to (re)set them to default values. I wonder if this is used as part of a version check of some sort?)

Well, after a little bi of testing, I can conclude that this fix has indeed improved the accuracy of the s-pen. It is hard to tell by how much, as I never had very terrible offsets myself, but at the edge of the screen, this has reduced the offsets by an observable amount.
Would it be possible to get the kernel fix implemented into the app so that I can use it on Baked rom ?
Many regards for all the hard work
Jack

JSale said:
Well, after a little bi of testing, I can conclude that this fix has indeed improved the accuracy of the s-pen. It is hard to tell by how much, as I never had very terrible offsets myself, but at the edge of the screen, this has reduced the offsets by an observable amount.
Would it be possible to get the kernel fix implemented into the app so that I can use it on Baked rom ?
Many regards for all the hard work
Jack
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow! Thanks for the testing and for the feedback on your results. This is quite interesting. I am not quite sure I can integrate this sort of thing into my app although it may be possible. The kernels for the Samsung devices I have looked at seem quite monolithic rather than modular. But I do know that one app, TouchScreenTune, does something that fiddles with the kernel in some way I do not fully understand. So perhaps. I would sure need help and direction. But it would be very cool indeed.

JSale said:
Would it be possible to get the kernel fix implemented into the app so that I can use it on Baked ROM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, the "kernel", the "ROM" and whichever app it uses are quite different things, but at least I can offer up the "commit" that makes it possible in the kernel (which has to then be pasted into a ROM). Have a/the Dev PM me.
whitedavidp said:
But I do know that one app, TouchScreenTune, does something that fiddles with the kernel in some way I do not fully understand.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most likely via a "sysfs" file, which seems to be the preferred method for this driver.

kcrudup said:
Well, the "kernel", the "ROM" and whichever app it uses are quite different things, but at least I can offer up the "commit" that makes it possible in the kernel (which has to then be pasted into a ROM). Have a/the Dev PM me.
Most likely via a "sysfs" file, which seems to be the preferred method for this driver.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If I want to point users of my app to your kernel as a means of gaining more SPen support, where should I send them? Does the Kernel have a main web page? And if so, what version should I point them towards? Thanks

whitedavidp said:
If I want to point users of my app to your kernel as a means of gaining more SPen support, where should I send them?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, right now the only kernel that's got this particular support is the one I've posted here- but every now and then I post up a kernel boot.img file for the latest Android Revolution ROM and for Darkman's latest Stock ROM and this patch will be included in those going forward. Most boot.img files among the various Note 10.1 devices are close enough that they'll almost always work for any ROM, Stock or Custom.
I don't keep any seperate thread or site for my kernel, as I'm really just sharing my own personal (yet improved and faster) kernel for Note 10.1 devices (and frankly don't feel like dealing with the inevitable newbie questions that a standalone offering would generate).
But I have a number of commits I'm about to push to my GitHub page; once I do that (give me a day or two, I've made some major changes to the kernel source and I'll need to verify all's well before I make them Public) I'll come back here with the GitHub commit web-page URL, then you can pass that to any ROM/Kernel dev and they can easily incorporate it in their particular builds (it's a really trvial patch, too- I just removed the 3 "#else" directives embedded in the "#ifdef CONFIG_MACH_P4NOTE" conditionals).

kcrudup said:
Well, right now the only kernel that's got this particular support is the one I've posted here- but every now and then I post up a kernel boot.img file for the latest Android Revolution ROM and for Darkman's latest Stock ROM and this patch will be included in those going forward. Most boot.img files among the various Note 10.1 devices are close enough that they'll almost always work for any ROM, Stock or Custom.
I don't keep any seperate thread or site for my kernel, as I'm really just sharing my own personal (yet improved and faster) kernel for Note 10.1 devices (and frankly don't feel like dealing with the inevitable newbie questions that a standalone offering would generate).
But I have a number of commits I'm about to push to my GitHub page; once I do that (give me a day or two, I've made some major changes to the kernel source and I'll need to verify all's well before I make them Public) I'll come back here with the GitHub commit web-page URL, then you can pass that to any ROM/Kernel dev and they can easily incorporate it in their particular builds (it's a really trvial patch, too- I just removed the 3 "#else" directives embedded in the "#ifdef CONFIG_MACH_P4NOTE" conditionals).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks very much once again!

whitedavidp said:
Thanks very much once again!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The app seems to work with this kernel :good:
kcrudup said:
Well, right now the only kernel that's got this particular support is the one I've posted here- but every now and then I post up a kernel boot.img file for the latest Android Revolution ROM and for Darkman's latest Stock ROM and this patch will be included in those going forward. Most boot.img files among the various Note 10.1 devices are close enough that they'll almost always work for any ROM, Stock or Custom.
I don't keep any seperate thread or site for my kernel, as I'm really just sharing my own personal (yet improved and faster) kernel for Note 10.1 devices (and frankly don't feel like dealing with the inevitable newbie questions that a standalone offering would generate).
But I have a number of commits I'm about to push to my GitHub page; once I do that (give me a day or two, I've made some major changes to the kernel source and I'll need to verify all's well before I make them Public) I'll come back here with the GitHub commit web-page URL, then you can pass that to any ROM/Kernel dev and they can easily incorporate it in their particular builds (it's a really trvial patch, too- I just removed the 3 "#else" directives embedded in the "#ifdef CONFIG_MACH_P4NOTE" conditionals).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really want to know what are the features of this kernel ... would i keep it or there are other ones that have this functionality right now?? OR could just this changes be added to the Stock kernel to only have Spen support .. as i dont want any OC or custom governers :good: :good:

whitedavidp said:
If I want to point users of my app to your kernel as a means of gaining more SPen support, where should I send them? Does the Kernel have a main web page? And if so, what version should I point them towards? Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
May I ask you what application you are talking about?
@kcrudup Have you already decided to release your kernel in a separate thread or not?

Verizon model ROM

If I was to start developing a custom ROM based on the latest ICS update for the Verizon model of this tab.... would there be any interest ?
I ask because last time I took the time to do one for the Verizon SGT (the original 7 incher) there wasn't that many interested "customers"

NRGZ28 said:
If I was to start developing a custom ROM based on the latest ICS update for the Verizon model of this tab.... would there be any interest ?
I ask because last time I took the time to do one for the Verizon SGT (the original 7 incher) there wasn't that many interested "customers"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would be interested.

NRGZ28 said:
If I was to start developing a custom ROM based on the latest ICS update for the Verizon model of this tab.... would there be any interest ?
I ask because last time I took the time to do one for the Verizon SGT (the original 7 incher) there wasn't that many interested "customers"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even if there isn't many "customers", there's always the personal challenge, satisfaction and self education Good luck
Sent from my GT-I9500 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

UpInTheAir said:
Even if there isn't many "customers", there's always the personal challenge, satisfaction and self education Good luck
Sent from my GT-I9500 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True.. I'm past all that at this level and it would just be the time invested. Sounds like it's not worth it. Heh

If you did an ICS rom and left the samsung video player in it and added ntfssd (from google play) or compiled your own kernel that would use exfat or ntfs (TWRP supports exfat) for large file support I would test it.
Keep in mind ICS has been done, but If you could figure out how to port kitkat to the device that would be awesome. Kitkat is supposed to have great memory management. The galaxy 7.7 only has 1GB of system memory HC ran fast on it but ICS is a bit of a dog even with bloat removed and tweaks applied. The port of PAC rom to the i815 gave me issues due to incorrectly signed files in the rom.

I haven't checked the general section on this forum for a long time but yea I still use my i815 quite often and the lack of stock development has been extremely disappointing. But there is a lot of driver work afaik particularly with the IR and LTE. I don't have a data plan on my i815 anymore but from time to time I may throw my phone SIM in there. Biggest thing for me over the other ROMs is having the function of the full hardware. I personally dislike touchwiz thoroughly with the exception of multiwindow features
So yea
I would definitely be interested there are likely a few others who would be interested but don't frequent this section. The i815 info thread I think still have a decent number of subscribers.

NRGZ28 said:
True.. I'm past all that at this level and it would just be the time invested. Sounds like it's not worth it. Heh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any further thought on this?

Currently I use in my car as a glorified GPS I might do a rom for it in the future

[ROM][SM-T800] stock Deodexed FN8

[LSD] Proudly Present​Galaxy Tab S 10.5 Stock ROM Deodexed [Rooted]​
Code:
Bla bla your warranty is void and you know that :rolleyes: or is it?
*Screenshots are taken from a note 10.1 (2012 edition) but apps are from Tab-S!
For changelog go to post 2
For information go to post 3
*Stock Modified Boot.img
*Stock Kernel
*Deodexed
*Zipaligned
*Init.d support
*Busybox
*Unsecure Kernel
*More stuff i don't remember
*Knox Removed Partially [Not sure if its in kernel as well]
*SE Linux Enforcing [Kernel sources ins't out or?]
Install Instructions
Extract updater-script to desktop and edit the partition details
repack the zip and flash using CWM Recovery
Special Thanks to
@open1your1eyes0
Download
P.S If you succeeded downloading the torrent please feel free to upload it to a host, i don't have access to any good file hosting service

Changelog
v0.1
Initial relase once CWM is available please report

Feel free to use this package however you wan't to.
You can even improve it however you wan't to i don't mind. No credits are needed i'm just here for sharing

Can't wait to try this
Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk

Thanks for this....BUT...custom recovery would be nice. Anyone working on it?

Patiently waiting for custom recovery! Look forward to trying this.

iMJets said:
Patiently waiting for custom recovery! Look forward to trying this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I don't think anyone is working on it, so we are stuck with stock. I'm sure eventually we will, but Dev action on this thing is poor.

suzook said:
Well I don't think anyone is working on it, so we are stuck with stock. I'm sure eventually we will, but Dev action on this thing is poor.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you heard something? I never owned something that did not have cool stuff.

One of the problems facing the S model is that Samsung just came out with the Pro model and most of the people who wanted a tablet of this caliber already bought that. If there never had been a Pro model I feel confident we would be getting a lot more activity.
Anyway we already have root and at least the 8.4 guys have a kernel.

mitchellvii said:
One of the problems facing the S model is that Samsung just came out with the Pro model and most of the people who wanted a tablet of this caliber already bought that. If there never had been a Pro model I feel confident we would be getting a lot more activity.
Anyway we already have root and at least the 8.4 guys have a kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only reason we have root,is beanstown did us a favor. If he had a tab, We would have custom recovery and custom ROMs already. I really don't understand why people won't donate a device.

mitchellvii said:
One of the problems facing the S model is that Samsung just came out with the Pro model and most of the people who wanted a tablet of this caliber already bought that. If there never had been a Pro model I feel confident we would be getting a lot more activity.
Anyway we already have root and at least the 8.4 guys have a kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
indeed

suzook said:
Only reason we have root,is beanstown did us a favor. If he had a tab, We would have custom recovery and custom ROMs already. I really don't understand why people won't donate a device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because xda is based wholly on developers doing others favors and not on being compensated in advance to do so. Anyone who enjoys bean's work is free to donate to him after the fact. Xda is a volunteer network, not a marketplace.
Just be patient. We'll get our share of kernels and roms eventually. It's not like the Tab S is a worthless brick without it. For me this performs better than any tablet I've ever owned as is.

Exactly. And it isn't as though you can't get much of what you would want from a custom ROM via Xposed, launchers, and the like.

HughesNet said:
Exactly. And it isn't as though you can't get much of what you would want from a custom ROM via Xposed, launchers, and the like.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly. Other than CM, most roms are just themed debloated stock with some Xposed thrown in.
** Edit: I put this badly. What I meant was that roms seem to people like themed debloated stock with some Xposed thrown in. They are not the game changers they used to be when these devices had weak processors and a few hundred extra benchmark points really meant something.
Roms are awesome, but they aren't as vital as they once were.

mitchellvii said:
Exactly. Other than CM, most roms are just themed debloated stock with some Xposed thrown in.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I couldn't disagree more. That's ridiculous.

mitchellvii said:
Exactly. Other than CM, most roms are just themed debloated stock with some Xposed thrown in.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Couldn't disagree with you more. There are alot of edits done to system files that you don't know about. Alot of work goes into incorporating those mods that people like you take for granted. Please don't be ignorant.

mitchellvii said:
Exactly. Other than CM, most roms are just themed debloated stock with some Xposed thrown in.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have built & released custom ROMs based on Samsung official firmware.
There is a huge amount of work involved to create these ROMs and even more to support them. That's why I quit. ... (Not enough time in the day). I rarely used Xposed except for unsupported DPI changes.
Samsung "stock" ROMs are based on official Samsung firmware.
CM is "stock" ROM based on official Google source.
Based on the above, both CM and Samsung "custom" ROMs are both "stock" and "custom" (as in customised)..... If you customise anything, then it is "custom"
I am sure though that your post doesn't exactly read what you really meant.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

Let me clarify. I think I put that badly.
While roms are quite an bit more work than just debloating, theming and using xposed, many of them feel to the user like that was all that was done, especially with these incredibly fast new processors that can overpower and make even not the best code run fast and smooth. I recall years ago when the HTC Evo came out. A good rom could make a HUGE difference in performance. Now take the Note 3. Using a great rom there by Freeza. Sure it's a little better than stock but the improvement isn't nearly as dramatic as in the past.
I guess my overall point is this. The Tab S is such an excellent device that even if if no one ever creates a rom for us, we will still be able to have a fast solid machine. Roms are awesome but they are not the game changers they once were.

mitchellvii said:
Let me clarify. I think I put that badly.
While roms are quite an bit more work than just debloating, theming and using xposed, many of them feel to the user like that was all that was done, especially with these incredibly fast new processors that can overpower and make even not the best code run fast and smooth. I recall years ago when the HTC Evo came out. A good rom could make a HUGE difference in performance. Now take the Note 3. Using a great rom there by Freeza. Sure it's a little better than stock but the improvement isn't nearly as dramatic in the past.
I guess my overall point is this. The Tab S is such an excellent device that even if if no one ever creates a rom for us, we will still be able to have a fast solid machine. Roms are awesome but they are not the game changers they once were.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I couldn't more then agree with you.
We already got the horse power of the tablet I never over clocked my s4 or note 10.1 because I don't feel the need to. Basically its the New features of other devices I'm curious to try out. that's why note 10.1 (2012) got the file manager from this tab and it's beautiful. A Rom is fast with a good options to choose for the user so he can make it his. Speed isn't anything that's basically needed of course its fun to use the max power but for the love of your tablet be careful. that's why I haven't included anything of these kind of apps.
Also just to mention one app is missing because it didn't deodex successfully. will add it as an optional package.
Again this is just a pure stock deodex rom I don't own this tablet but I decided since i used it for porting and there was no deodexed rom I'd make one. Does anyone know what partition boot image is at?
Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk

Wasn't Xposed designed to give the average user access to customizations they would typically only get in a rom previously? Sort of like a WYSIWYG editor instead of writing out the code by hand? And launchers speed up your experience in many of the ways only roms used to. With root and a decent app anyone can debloat their rig.
So many of the things we used to need roms for we no longer do. Of course roms like CM make a bigger difference but then again you give up some cool functionality. It's like taking the surround sound out of a racecar. Yeah you go faster but you miss your tunes (or split screen as the case may be).
Anyway, for me root and a good kernel are essential. Roms? A luxury but no longer the staple they used to be. That's not to say luxuries aren't nice and I'm sure I'll indulge if a certified developer cooks one up for us, but even if they never do I'm ok. This tablet still rocks.
DISCLAIMER: Everything I've written here is simply my opinion and the viewpoint of a non developer. I am not attempting to pontificate some greater truth, it's simply how I see it. If you disagree with me that's all good. It's a big tent here and room for lots of different viewpoints. ☺

Verizon Note 7 Port ROM - Project turned over to the community!

I'm back on Verizon after switching to Sprint back in 2008. So I recently picked up a mint condition Verizon Note 4 so I could have a little fun building a new Note 7 port ROM. Many of you may know me as the creator of the Ultimate Note 7 ROM for the Sprint Note 4. I'm here to tell all of you that I've been working on a new Ultimate Note 7 ROM for the Verizon Note 4. It is nearly ready for public beta release! With the experience I have porting Samsung Touchwiz ROM's. I figured it is long overdue for the Verizon Note 4 users. My port ROM has official and original Verizon Note 7 framework, apps, etc. So instead of trying to make international port ROM's work, which is no simple task unless you know what you're doing, get ready for a true Verizon compatible Note 7 ROM. Those of you who still have your Verizon Note 4 and want to get more life and use from it with a fresh look and feel, look for a new ROM thread soon.
I need a few reliable and knowledgeable testers. If you can help troubleshoot and test the rom, please install Telegram app on your PC and your phone and join my Hybrid Port ROM's group so you can have access to the the test ROM and join the rest of us who are ready to get this thing going. See you there!

Why not a Note 8 ROM or Oreo ROM? Just curious. Forgive me, I wouldn't know of any technical constraints.

i cant wait thanks man

JOSHSKORN said:
Why not a Note 8 ROM or Oreo ROM? Just curious. Forgive me, I wouldn't know of any technical constraints.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The S8 and N8 ROM's are Nougat 7.0. The N4 has been cut off at Android 6.0 and doesn't have official Samsung Nougat 7.0 kernel source, therefore the Snapdragon N4 can't run Android 7.0. ROM's. If this was possible we would have a lot of excited dev's continuing to build 7.0 TouchWiz ROM's for the N4. Unfortunately Marshmallow 6.0 is all we have for the N4 so the N7 Marshmallow software and perhaps some ported S8/N8 apps is as good as it gets for the N4. What i'm doing is building a solid N7 base ROM for the Verizon N4. Once it's ready I will upload it as a stock base rom. Other dev's can use my base to build out custom ROM's with mods, ROM control, Xposed, etc, etc. This will eliminate the need to fix any network related features. It will all work as it should. International N7 port ROM's are not compatible with the U.S. CDMA carrier's features. This is why we need a true Verizon N7 base rom. I know it's a little late and many people have upgraded to newer phones but if there's still users here wanting to run a proper Verizon N7 ROM, this will be it.
With this said, I welcome any and all testers and dev's to pitch in and help test and troubleshoot minor bugs. PM me if you're interested in helping with this. The ROM is 100% complete and operational but I'm working on minor bugs with a few system apps.

tx_dbs_tx said:
The S8 and N8 ROM's are Nougat 7.0. The N4 has been cut off at Android 6.0 and doesn't have official Samsung Nougat 7.0 kernel source, therefore the Snapdragon N4 can't run Android 7.0. ROM's. If this was possible we would have a lot of excited dev's continuing to build 7.0 TouchWiz ROM's for the N4. Unfortunately Marshmallow 6.0 is all we have for the N4 so the N7 Marshmallow software and perhaps some ported S8/N8 apps is as good as it gets for the N4. What i'm doing is building a solid N7 base ROM for the Verizon N4. Once it's ready I will upload it as a stock base rom. Other dev's can use my base to build out custom ROM's with mods, ROM control, Xposed, etc, etc. This will eliminate the need to fix any network related features. It will all work as it should. International N7 port ROM's are not compatible with the U.S. CDMA carrier's features. This is why we need a true Verizon N7 base rom. I know it's a little late and many people have upgraded to newer phones but if there's still users here wanting to run a proper Verizon N7 ROM, this will be it.
With this said, I welcome any and all testers and dev's to pitch in and help test and troubleshoot minor bugs. PM me if you're interested in helping with this. The ROM is 100% complete and operational but I'm working on minor bugs with a few system apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I realize the Note 4 has been cut off at Android 6.0, but how are devs able to come up with a 7.1.2 ROM for it? User hsbadr has three: LineageOS, ResurrectionRemix. and EmotionOS (this one seems to be discontinued). I haven't used any of his ROMs for quite some time, because they seem a bit buggy, to me, but that's beside the point I'm getting at. How is he able to make a 7.0 ROM and others can't seem to? That said, why wouldn't an 8.0 ROM be possible?

JOSHSKORN said:
I realize the Note 4 has been cut off at Android 6.0, but how are devs able to come up with a 7.1.2 ROM for it? User hsbadr has three: LineageOS, ResurrectionRemix. and EmotionOS (this one seems to be discontinued). I haven't used any of his ROMs for quite some time, because they seem a bit buggy, to me, but that's beside the point I'm getting at. How is he able to make a 7.0 ROM and others can't seem to? That said, why wouldn't an 8.0 ROM be possible?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're talking about AOSP ROM's. Those ROM's are open source from Google, not Samsung Touchwiz ROM's. Big difference. The kernels they build are not compatible with Samsung Touchwiz ROM's

bmhbmh715 said:
i cant wait thanks man
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1

Thanks for this!

Would there be anyway you could make it to use normal bootanimation.zip?

tx_dbs_tx said:
Those of you who still have your Verizon Note 4 and want to get more life and use from it with a fresh look and feel, look for a new ROM thread soon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello, I am still rocking the note 4 Verizon. And I will be keeping it as long as devoted members such as yourself put out great roms! That being said I would like to be a beta tester if you so need one. I have a little knowledge in troubleshooting and the like, mostly my expertise is in repairing and building phones. I have a whole closet that's devoted to phone parts repair, and computer systems repair. My last few phones I have held on to until the dev section went quiet, note 2, Moto atrix, moto bionic... they were awesome with deodexed/rooted roms... I am addicted to flashing new roms to find the right balance between performance and battery...
By the way, one slight request, when all said and done fixing most of the bugs, don't forget to make sure the rom has a kernel that is compatible with extended batterys. Most of us holding out with our outdated note 4, usually have those huge batteries hanging off the back...lol

getyroks said:
By the way, one slight request, when all said and done fixing most of the bugs, don't forget to make sure the rom has a kernel that is compatible with extended batterys. Most of us holding out with our outdated note 4, usually have those huge batteries hanging off the back...lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No worries. I'm using the Flashpoint kernel and there's also an extended battery version. It's based on Verizon N4 QI2 so it's good to go.

OH MY GLOB!
I still have my Verizon Note 4, can't wait for this rom ???

tx_dbs_tx said:
No worries. I'm using the Flashpoint kernel and there's also an extended battery version. It's based on Verizon N4 QI2 so it's good to go.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just figured you would build your own kernel. Yes, flashpoint is the best in my opinion, as of right now.

getyroks said:
I just figured you would build your own kernel. Yes, flashpoint is the best in my opinion, as of right now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really don't mess with kernels. That's not really my forte. If needed, I would just ask someone to build one. But since there's already one available and it happens to be from Verizon source I will use it and give credit. But I may request a new kernel from the latest source once I get the rom ready.

tx_dbs_tx said:
I really don't mess with kernels. That's not really my forte. If needed, I would just ask someone to build one. But since there's already one available and it happens to be from Verizon source I will use it and give credit. But I may request a new kernel from the latest source once I get the rom ready.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think I may have the CQL1 source kernel ready. I've been running it since Tues and was thinking of posting it soon. If you, or anyone else, wants to try it out you can download it here.
The source code is here for those interested.
The changes are the same as the ones for the 910F beta kernel that was posted the other day.
Change Log:
Backported the 3.18 Linux version of Interactive Governor
Add patch for USB fast charge
Add Sound Controls- so far this hasn't negatively impacted anything but it's definitely the change I'm most concerned about and will probably make a separate version without this in the future. Be careful with this. Had my earbuds in and it gets very loud.
LED fade control
Completely reworked the thermal temperature control. So far the temperature has been throttling down pretty good when it goes above the set temp. I've been setting mine on the lowest setting.
Added zswap control
Extended Battery patch is included
On a personal note, I'm very excited to see a port rom that's not built with an international firmware. If there's anything I can help with let me know. My skills are somewhat limited but every now and again I can get lucky.

Thanks Kevin. What I want to do is get the stockish base N7 ROM done then see if there's somebody who wants to take it to the next level and add mods, rom control etc, etc. I know a lot of people like the custom mods, xposed, etc but these days I really don't care for that stuff as long as everything works as it should i'm happy. So if you know of someone who could take on that task once I get the base ROM finished, then that would be great for everyone who wants the custom stuff. And I can take a break. I'll pm some of you once the test build is ready. We'll need to test the basic functions like bluetooth NFC, wifi, etc. It should all work because i've ported these roms before so I know what all i have to do. I'll get the test rom ready as soon as i can as time permits. I'm going over framework getting it debugged and making sure it's a smooth and zippy as i can make it.

tx_dbs_tx said:
Thanks Kevin. What I want to do is get the stockish base N7 ROM done then see if there's somebody who wants to take it to the next level and add mods, rom control etc, etc. I know a lot of people like the custom mods, xposed, etc but these days I really don't care for that stuff as long as everything works as it should i'm happy. So if you know of someone who could take on that task once I get the base ROM finished, then that would be great for everyone who wants the custom stuff. And I can take a break. I'll pm some of you once the test build is ready. We'll need to test the basic functions like bluetooth NFC, wifi, etc. It should all work because i've ported these roms before so I know what all i have to do. I'll get the test rom ready as soon as i can as time permits. I'm going over framework getting it debugged and making sure it's a smooth and zippy as i can make it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't use xposed anymore... too much of a hassle to get through some apps that look for it and are diabled from xposed...
Couple brainstorming requests, or something... lol
the people Edge should work properly... I've had so many TW roms that are half done and people Edge is boinked..
Something with note 7 roms and task manager is buggy on note 4...
There is a fingerprint work around for ported roms, if we could get a good, understandable write up to make that work, that would be appreciated.
TW launcher should be themeable... some ports I've tried have that boinked as well.
The brightness on some ports has an issue with not dimming, or high brightness when in sunlight and darkness...
Mostly stock feel and look is quite nice though.

getyroks said:
I don't use xposed anymore... too much of a hassle to get through some apps that look for it and are diabled from xposed...
Couple brainstorming requests, or something... lol
the people Edge should work properly... I've had so many TW roms that are half done and people Edge is boinked..
Something with note 7 roms and task manager is buggy on note 4...
There is a fingerprint work around for ported roms, if we could get a good, understandable write up to make that work, that would be appreciated.
TW launcher should be themeable... some ports I've tried have that boinked as well.
The brightness on some ports has an issue with not dimming, or high brightness when in sunlight and darkness...
Mostly stock feel and look is quite nice though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All of the things you mentioned will be working, except fingerprint scanner. That is a lot harder to pull off and will be the very last thing on the to-do list. If it could be made to work other dev's would have figured it out by now without the N4 settings apk swap trick. But i will definitely try my best to get the fingerprint scanner working with my verizon N7 ROM. With Kevin's custom kernel this will be an amazing ROM for the Verizon N4! It's coming along great. It's raining all day today so i'm inside hammering away on the ROM.

tx_dbs_tx said:
All of the things you mentioned will be working, except fingerprint scanner. That is a lot harder to pull off and will be the very last thing on the to-do list. If it could be made to work other dev's would have figured it out by now without the N4 settings apk swap trick. But i will definitely try my best to get the fingerprint scanner working with my verizon N7 ROM. With Kevin's custom kernel this will be an amazing ROM for the Verizon N4! It's coming along great. It's raining all day today so i'm inside hammering away on the ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I kniw it's tricky with the fingerprint, I was just suggesting an easy unified post of HOW to do it on this new rom you're making

getyroks said:
I kniw it's tricky with the fingerprint, I was just suggesting an easy unified post of HOW to do it on this new rom you're making
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well it's never been accomplished by anyone as far as I know. I started working on the fingerprint scanner fix for my sprint UN7 ROM but I abandoned it due to the complexity and the time it takes to do it. It wasn't worth the amount of time and work. This is why it hasn't already been done. We'll see how it goes but I seriously doubt fingerprint scanner will be working on initial release. it's probably my biggest negative on running the N7 port ROM. I use fingerprint lockscreen even though it's the swipe method.