So T-Mobile USA has been branding their improved HSPA+ as 4G for quite a while and they have also been making physical changes to phones to get them to support up to 42mbps. Now it appears that they are doing the same to the Nexus 4.
In theory, 21mbps is plenty fast and in fact faster than most LTE phones get as actual download speed today but of course 21 is not actual speed. So with AT&T for example, you could be on their LTE network with a max speed much higher than 21 but actually get 15mbps while their HSPA+ network with max speed of 21 would give you only 4-5.
My question for anyone that knows this issue well: Is it the same case with TMobile's network? If you get the stock Nexus 4 capped at 21mbps and someone with a tmobile 42mbps phone is getting an actual speed of 15mbps, are you likely to get the same 15 or something lower?
TIA, Babak
You will get lower.
I have a gnex with 21 Mbps and before that I had a mytouch 4g with 14.4Mbps. Without changing the location (boston) where I was using T-mobile's network I see faster (not huge increase) network speeds with the Gnex.
BUT Google has the Tech specs sheet https://sites.google.com/site/androidpresssite/home/tech-specs
And here it seems that the Nexus 4 on the play store will be the exact same model as the T-mobile version (42Mbps) so I think everyone gets the good speeds (I hope!)
The question is...is the specs on the google play page a typo or a hidden feature (42Mbps via software/radio flash) or a different phone (SKU etc)?
If there is a special N4 phone for TMO, then, there will be different FCC reports indicating as such. One for the Play Store and one for TMo. We'll just have to keep an eye out and see.
I'm coming from a GNex and I haven't any complaints w.r.t. download speeds.
What I find really lame is the pricing that TMo has set if you buy their phone. Right now it is rumored to be $200 + $20 for 20 months. Currently, there is no full buy-out price except for what is listed on the Play Store.
Saturn1217 said:
You will get lower.
I have a gnex with 21 Mbps and before that I had a mytouch 4g with 14.4Mbps. Without changing the location (boston) where I was using T-mobile's network I see faster (not huge increase) network speeds with the Gnex.
BUT Google has the Tech specs sheet https://sites.google.com/site/androidpresssite/home/tech-specs
And here it seems that the Nexus 4 on the play store will be the exact same model as the T-mobile version (42Mbps) so I think everyone gets the good speeds (I hope!)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much for that insight. I haven't verified this independently but this implies that it's not the same phone and that the Play Store version will not get 42mbps:
http://phandroid.com/2012/10/29/t-mobile-nexus-4-price/
The price also implies that it can't be the same device!
bfspider said:
The question is...is the specs on the google play page a typo or a hidden feature (42Mbps via software/radio flash) or a different phone (SKU etc)?
If there is a special N4 phone for TMO, then, there will be different FCC reports indicating as such. One for the Play Store and one for TMo. We'll just have to keep an eye out and see.
I'm coming from a GNex and I haven't any complaints w.r.t. download speeds.
What I find really lame is the pricing that TMo has set if you buy their phone. Right now it is rumored to be $200 + $20 for 20 months. Currently, there is no full buy-out price except for what is listed on the Play Store.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly! See my post above, but looking at previous pricing by TMO, it does appear that the retail price can't be only $350. If it was, this would come out to an APR of 132%!!!
bmozaffari said:
Exactly! See my post above, but looking at previous pricing by TMO, it does appear that the retail price can't be only $350. If it was, this would come out to an APR of 132%!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks like the phone from the Play Store does support 42Mbps..
http://www.androidcentral.com/fyi-nexus-4-rocks-42-mbps
Edit
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
First, the radio speed is a maximum potential speed in ideal conditions. If you take a phone with a 21mbps radio, paired with a tower capable of 21mbps, you'd need to be under ideal conditions to get anywhere near it. I have a 21mbps radio in my SGS 2, but I'm on AT&T Medianet, so the best I've seen is around 7-7.5mbps (I suspect that 7.2 is the cap on Medianet). My wife has an iPhone 4s with a 14mbps radio, and the best I've seen on hers (legita unlimited plan unlike my medianet) was 8-9mbps.
As far as I remember, AT&T only supports up to 21mbps, so phones with a 21 or 42mbps radio on AT&T will have the same performance. But, a 42mbps radio on T-Mobile's 42mbps network will see higher performance than a phone with a 21mbps radio on the same network. I have seen people here and on other forums show off speedtest results in excess of 20mbps on T-Mobile's network. Naturally, your speeds will come down to many factors, to include obstructions, signal strength, distance to tower, local network congestion, swamp gas reflecting off venus, etc.
Vanhoud said:
Only the tmobile version will support hspa42
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there is no such thing as a "tmo" version.
Well thanks to those who've confirmed that there is indeed a speed difference even under 21mbps between a TMO and standard phone but as far as the Nexus 4 in the Play Store, I'm no less confused...
It appears to me that come November 13, Play Store will feature a TMO version at a higher price but I'm not 100% sure yet.
bmozaffari said:
Well thanks to those who've confirmed that there is indeed a speed difference even under 21mbps between a TMO and standard phone but as far as the Nexus 4 in the Play Store, I'm no less confused...
It appears to me that come November 13, Play Store will feature a TMO version at a higher price but I'm not 100% sure yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If, and I do mean if, there are two versions, the T-Mobile "version" (which would just have different radios) would be directly from T-Mobile, probably not in the Play store. Probably.
Ajfink said:
If, and I do mean if, there are two versions, the T-Mobile "version" (which would just have different radios) would be directly from T-Mobile, probably not in the Play store. Probably.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
See the availability section in the bottom, it does say it will be available in the Play Store as well as select T-Mobile stores:
http://www.tmonews.com/2012/10/t-mobile-confirms-nexus-4-hspa-42mbps-connectivity/
So is HSPA+ 42Mbps the same thing as having DC-HSDPA?
I am wondering and hoping so. Right now I use Vodafone here in Australia and the new 3G+ network has DC-HSPDA but only the dreaded Apple devices support it so far.
Odd.
On the Play Store, it claims pentaband HSPA+21.
On the TMO announcement, it claims quad-band HSPA+42.
Either there are different radios, or there's a typo on one or both spec sheets.
funkyblue04 said:
So is HSPA+ 42Mbps the same thing as having DC-HSDPA?
I am wondering and hoping so. Right now I use Vodafone here in Australia and the new 3G+ network has DC-HSPDA but only the dreaded Apple devices support it so far.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think so. DC appears to be dual cell whereas TMO has its own made-up thing that no Apple product supports.
jaykresge said:
Odd.
On the Play Store, it claims pentaband HSPA+21.
On the TMO announcement, it claims quad-band HSPA+42.
Either there are different radios, or there's a typo on one or both spec sheets.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it is a typo or something that needs to be added to the spec sheet on the play store. If there is a "TMo version" aka different SKUs, then, it will pop up in the FCC reports.
jaykresge said:
On the TMO announcement, it claims quad-band HSPA+42.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It says "quad band" but then it lists 5 different bands, so that's clearly just a typo.
There is only one version of this phone being sold worldwide. People are reading way too much into what are clearly typos.
drumist said:
It says "quad band" but then it lists 5 different bands, so that's clearly just a typo.
There is only one version of this phone being sold worldwide. People are reading way too much into what are clearly typos.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FWIW, that has never happened before. There has never been a phone sold by anyone other than TMO (or at least expressly for use on TMO) that has had support for 42mbps on their network. On the other hand, if I recall correctly, Google did sell different models of Nexus One for AT&T and TMO on their own site.
bmozaffari said:
FWIW, that has never happened before. There has never been a phone sold by anyone other than TMO (or at least expressly for use on TMO) that has had support for 42mbps on their network. On the other hand, if I recall correctly, Google did sell different models of Nexus One for AT&T and TMO on their own site.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not true, the miui phone supports dchspa and I'm pretty sure the iPhone does too. The unlocked version.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
bmozaffari said:
FWIW, that has never happened before. There has never been a phone sold by anyone other than TMO (or at least expressly for use on TMO) that has had support for 42mbps on their network. On the other hand, if I recall correctly, Google did sell different models of Nexus One for AT&T and TMO on their own site.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right, but the Nexus One wasn't pentaband. It just doesn't make any sense to make a 21mbps version and a 42mbps version, when literally nothing else is different.
---------- Post added at 08:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:21 PM ----------
BennyJr said:
Not true, the miui phone supports dchspa and I'm pretty sure the iPhone does too. The unlocked version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The iPhone 5 supports DC-HSDPA, but doesn't support T-Mobile's primary 3G frequency band. So you would only be able to get a 3G signal in select areas that have T-Mobile 1900MHz 3G towers, which aren't in many areas yet.
Related
If I were to buy a Tab from Europe for use in the United States on AT&T, is there a particular model out there that works on the bands AT&T supports? As I understand it, the phone capability is disabled on the U.S. release, so I'd like to get one that has the capability, since I'm a bluetooth user primarily for phone calls anyway.
jdsemler said:
If I were to buy a Tab from Europe for use in the United States on AT&T, is there a particular model out there that works on the bands AT&T supports? As I understand it, the phone capability is disabled on the U.S. release, so I'd like to get one that has the capability, since I'm a bluetooth user primarily for phone calls anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If we are lucky the phone is disabled only at the ROM level... In which case we may get it back when flashing
If you want the right 3G bands, I would bet on Telstra (Australia0 or Bell (Canada). The problem is you'll probably end up paying more than US versions
We are on the same boat btw...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=824676
What worries me is AT&T has been super slow in announcing its model... We still have no idea when it will be available or how much it will cost
^ Most likely before the holiday shopping season begins. They wont DARE miss it.
What At&t is probably doing is focusing on Windows Phone 7 for a while before switching their marketing over to the Galaxy Tab. Also, let the other carriers market the crap out of their own Galaxy Tabs so At&t stands out from the crowd.
The three carriers will be launching their Tabs only a couple of days from each other. T-Mobile is first, two days later Verizon then 4 days later Sprint.
I would love to get an Euro version to use on AT&T, but they are so damn expensive. The cheapest I've found is $939!!!!
INeedYourHelp said:
I would love to get an Euro version to use on AT&T, but they are so damn expensive. The cheapest I've found is $939!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On top of that 3G won't work in the US... So no don;t do that, it would be such a waste...
Alcibiade said:
On top of that 3G won't work in the US... So no don;t do that, it would be such a waste...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NOT true.
The euro model WILL WORK on at&t's 3G just fine (and will make call just fine) if you live in an area that at&t uses 1900Mhz for its 3G network.
I use it just fine here in the SF Bay Area.
tab
I think if your going to get a tab with no contract the best one to get would be the tmobile one the sim slot is still here so it may just be the rom they mess with,
plus the price is like 599 us why pay 989 plus shipping
bulldebeerman said:
I think if your going to get a tab with no contract the best one to get would be the tmobile one the sim slot is still here so it may just be the rom they mess with,
plus the price is like 599 us why pay 989 plus shipping
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
???????
You think the slim slot will be missing on other carriers ? Yeah right...
There will be a SIM slot on all of the Tabs in the US. You need a SIM for 3G connections
clubtech said:
NOT true.
The euro model WILL WORK on at&t's 3G just fine (and will make call just fine) if you live in an area that at&t uses 1900Mhz for its 3G network.
I use it just fine here in the SF Bay Area.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And you'll be missing 850 Mhx band
So... you pay nearly twice the price of the US Tab and you get a crippled device... Sounds like a great deal !
Alcibiade said:
You think the slim slot will be missing on other carriers ? Yeah right...
There will be a SIM slot on all of the Tabs in the US. You need a SIM for 3G connections
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It'll be missing on the Sprint and Verizon models as they're CDMA-based and therefore don't use SIM cards.
Hey guys- there is already a post that discusses this question. please be careful about clogging the site up with questions that have already been discussed. (it's upsetting the Russians)
As far as the 850 band goes, it's just as fast and available as the 1900 band. 850 was added to relieve congestion due to IPhone users in 2010. 1900 is still most places and isn't going away.
I wouldn't knock someone because they decided to get the euro version without 850. Clubtech has been rocking out on his for about a month with voice capability unlocked while we are sitting around hoping that the US carrier version can be hacked. That only cost him roughly 50 bucks a week and that drops every day we don't have one. Seems pretty smart at this point and by the time we do get ours and figure out how to unlock the phone the difference in price will be negligible. plus he's already saving for the next gen tab while we wait for this one. And how upset will you be when you find out the hardware is disconnected and we can't get the phone turned on and have to pay the same price 2 months later after already buying the castrated US version. I guess we will find out after Thursday. Also, I heard a nasty rumor that the front facing camera on the AT&T version is removed.
I plan to get the T-Mo version without a contract on Wed and then hand that off to my wife as a Wi-Fi only tab when I can get my hands on the unlocked 850 band model that has phone capability as shown on mobilecity.com or Negrielectronics.com. I don't care what the price is, I just want to rock out on a tab like Clubtech is doing NOW!!!
dboppc130 said:
Clubtech has been rocking out on his for about a month...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought the release date was November first?
he got the Italian model several weeks ago
I didn't realise they'd launched it there earlier, for some reason I was under the impression it was launched across Europe on the same date.
Only the UK model was delayed untill Nov 1. Italy, Germany and several others have had it since early Oct.
The offical unlocked 850/1900 version was delayed until early 2011. Atleast thats what Samsung told Nergi however, the Bell version is offically coming on Nov 12th and that version has 850/1900 3G bands so there ya go... Full 3G in the USA!
Hi guys... I joined xda to try to figure out the best way to get voice calling in the US on the Tab... so thank you all so much for your information.
In an attempt to see if I have 1900MHz coverage from AT&T in my area... I called their 800 no. (1-800-331-0500) given to me by the local office, cus they didn't know precise coverage areas.
At the 800 number, the rep read from an Oct 10 release (on their MyCustomer Service Portal) where AT&T says that "because the number of customers with 1900MHz only phones is declinging" they are phasing out that frequency in 2010-2011. It's already begun in 30 markets (OKC phase out should be complete by Dec 2 according to the release). (Edited to add: clubtech says that they've been saying this since 2008, and hasn't happened yet.... so maybe it won't? who knows...)
They said they would replace customers' phones as the frequency was phased out if they were 1900MHz only.
And from what I've been able to learn here and elsewhere... it is the 1900MHz frequency that the Galaxy Tab uses, not the 850 frequency (at least on AT&T).
Sooooo.... isn't that lovely?
Looks like a Euro unlocked will not work for too much longer... altho maybe by the time the 1900 bands are phased out, there will be other workarounds.
So it's either back to mobilecity to preorder the 3G unlocked version for $879 (and who knows when that will be in?) or wait to see if the T-Mo version can be flashed to voice calling... which hopefully we will know soon.
btw... in my searching, clubtech was kind enough to enlighten me that the Euro version Tabs on eBay will only work on the 2G network of T-Mobile, which obviously is no good... so heads up on that.
But I must say I am getting even more pissed at the US carriers for making it so difficult to use the phone features of the tablet.
xexes said:
Hi guys... I joined xda to try to figure out the best way to get voice calling in the US on the Tab... so thank you all so much for your information.
In an attempt to see if I have 1900MHz coverage from AT&T in my area... I called their 800 no. (1-800-331-0500) given to me by the local office, cus they didn't know precise coverage areas.
At the 800 number, the rep read from an Oct 10 release (on their MyCustomer Service Portal) where AT&T says that "because the number of customers with 1900MHz only phones is declinging" they are phasing out that frequency in 2010-2011. It's already begun in 30 markets (OKC phase out should be complete by Dec 2 according to the release). (Edited to add: clubtech says that they've been saying this since 2008, and hasn't happened yet.... so maybe it won't? who knows...)
They said they would replace customers' phones as the frequency was phased out if they were 1900MHz only.
And from what I've been able to learn here and elsewhere... it is the 1900MHz frequency that the Galaxy Tab uses, not the 850 frequency (at least on AT&T).
Sooooo.... isn't that lovely?
Looks like a Euro unlocked will not work for too much longer... altho maybe by the time the 1900 bands are phased out, there will be other workarounds.
So it's either back to mobilecity to preorder the 3G unlocked version for $879 (and who knows when that will be in?) or wait to see if the T-Mo version can be flashed to voice calling... which hopefully we will know soon.
btw... in my searching, clubtech was kind enough to enlighten me that the Euro version Tabs on eBay will only work on the 2G network of T-Mobile, which obviously is no good... so heads up on that.
But I must say I am getting even more pissed at the US carriers for making it so difficult to use the phone features of the tablet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What starts to piss me off is AT&T has still not given any release date. Probably trying to please Apple... Once AT&T's tab is out we'll find out whether the call has been disabled at the hardware level (Given Samsung's history, I kind of doubt it)
But point taken, Cell phones networks (and operators) are at the level of Third World countries in America... (I lived in Hong Kong and Japan before)
Alcibiade said:
But point taken, Cell phones networks (and operators) are at the level of Third World countries in America... (I lived in Hong Kong and Japan before)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Different countries' networks have different strong points and weak points.
In the UK, the biggest upside is the competitive pricing. The biggest downside is the generally poor data services, allowances, prices and speeds.
In the US, the cons seem to be the 50/50 split between two technologies, making matters unnecessarily complex and reducing competition, thus leading to poorer pricing. The pros relate to the superior adoption/acceptance of data usage, more generous allowances, pushing forwards with better network technologies and higher speeds.
Or, at least, that's how I see it.
I'm on the same boat with you Alcibiade. Although I tend to believe it's the collaborative decision, or perhaps more on the Samsung's side, to make the Tab more competitive to the iPad. If you look at the pricing of the Euro/Asia version, it's pretty much no contest against the iPad. For them to sell it here in the State (the home of walmart, Target, etc, and where iPad is from) they really had to take drastic approach to lower it in order to match the iPad. And that leaves u, and me getting frustrated about if we really do have the type of options that Samsung is trying to appeal to the consumer (by offering the same device to different carriers).
From what I can gather, aside from the lack of the voice capability, there are small difference between carriers. Spring and Verizon's version seems to have only 2GB built in memory. The T-Mobile runs on it's own 3G band. And AT&T's version is up in the air. I know for me I definitely need GSM for traveling, so that really leaves me without too much choice.
Albeit maybe i am just in the minority. But i really wish they could make purchasing Tab as easy as buying the iPad.
International market is getting Atrix 3G, US is getting 4G. Is there any difference? As far as I know, both versions support HSPA+.
syl0n said:
International market is getting Atrix 3G, US is getting 4G. Is there any difference? As far as I know, both versions support HSPA+.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Largely terminology. If you mean HSPA+, then no, there's no difference. Someone has hinted that the Atrix will make it to other carriers. If it goes to Verizon, we could see a version that supports LTE. Then you'll have a difference. Until then, it's HSPA+ on various frequencies (assuming there will be a European version on a quirky frequency, and assuming it hits TMo).
Sent from my Sexy Nexy, courtesy of the fine developers of Tapatalk
There is no difference at all. In Europe they don't call HSPA+ 4G, so it's not called a 4G phone there.
It's kind of weird, it's probably because of some more restrictive laws outside the US where you can't call a cat a tiger (after all, HSPA+ is NOT 4G). Otherwise, they would surely market it the same way in Canada and Europe.
PuerkitoBio said:
It's kind of weird, it's probably because of some more restrictive laws outside the US where you can't call a cat a tiger (after all, HSPA+ is NOT 4G). Otherwise, they would surely market it the same way in Canada and Europe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The idea of US carriers calling HSPA+ 4G is that it is delivering 4G speeds using upgraded 3G technology. 14.4Mbps HSPA+ with AT&T is nearly on par with the LTE speeds we will see on Verizon initially. T-Mobile is cranking their HSPA+ up to 42Mbps or something similar. It will be some time before carriers can really flex LTE muscle, but for now there really won't be that huge of a speed difference, so all these carriers calling their data tech 4G is just marketing.
Besides, LTE is NOT 4G either by definition. LTE is more of a 3.5G technology, similar to HSPA+, but the cool thing with LTE is that over time it can be upgraded to approximately 300Mbps theoretical download speed, while HSPA+ can only be upgraded to approximately 84Mbps download speed.
LTE Advanced will be the first technically compliant 4G technology on the market, but we are still years off from seeing that in the real world.
So take everything you see about 4G as a grain of salt. Atrix 4G vs Atrix is just marketing lingo.
And when people want to say that the Droid Bionic is a real 4G device would technically be incorrect. So don't think your Atrix is in any way inferior to the Bionic (except maybe camera and screen size).
PuerkitoBio said:
It's kind of weird, it's probably because of some more restrictive laws outside the US where you can't call a cat a tiger (after all, HSPA+ is NOT 4G).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is now. Standards folks changed their minds, and as of last month or so current WiMax, current LTE, and HSPA+ are all 4G.
when i talked with my rep basically he said they were dropping the 4g just to make things easier. The phone is the same, just some people are still using the superfluous 4g tag.
Does this mean that we can buy a sim-free Atrix 4g from at&t, bring it to europe and use it with european sim cards?or any other gsm sim-cards around the world?
Po0yAn said:
Does this mean that we can buy a sim-free Atrix 4g from at&t, bring it to europe and use it with european sim cards?or any other gsm sim-cards around the world?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd really like to know that as well. Besides this the only thing preventing me from ordering an unlocked version as soon as such is available is the bootloader thing.
A_Kirsh said:
I'd really like to know that as well. Besides this the only thing preventing me from ordering an unlocked version as soon as such is available is the bootloader thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same here.thats why im considering galaxy s2 now. i have both moto milestone and galaxy s,the build quality of moto is way better.also my friends like the milestone build and look more,but the locked up bootloader really frustrated me.although there aren't much of great custom roms for galaxy s either,we haven't had a decent cyanogenmod rom around yet, after 8 month since galaxy s been released.
i like atrix more because of better build,higher resolution and tegra 2,but the damn bootloader and later release date along with slightly better specs for s2 like shipping with 2.3 and better camera is changing my desire.
not to mention that this time moto is using PenTile for it LCD and sami is using stripe matrix for its samoled+. thats another let down for atrix.
it was stupid from moto to change the lcd tech on atrix, stripe matrix looked great on milestone.
u can see the differences here:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4165/the-motorola-atrix-4g-preview/4
you can see im pretty confused here!if only the damn nexus s was shipped with a daul core cpu!
LockeCPM4 said:
The idea of US carriers calling HSPA+ 4G is that it is delivering 4G speeds using upgraded 3G technology. 14.4Mbps HSPA+ with AT&T is nearly on par with the LTE speeds we will see on Verizon initially. T-Mobile is cranking their HSPA+ up to 42Mbps or something similar. It will be some time before carriers can really flex LTE muscle, but for now there really won't be that huge of a speed difference, so all these carriers calling their data tech 4G is just marketing.
Besides, LTE is NOT 4G either by definition. LTE is more of a 3.5G technology, similar to HSPA+, but the cool thing with LTE is that over time it can be upgraded to approximately 300Mbps theoretical download speed, while HSPA+ can only be upgraded to approximately 84Mbps download speed.
LTE Advanced will be the first technically compliant 4G technology on the market, but we are still years off from seeing that in the real world.
So take everything you see about 4G as a grain of salt. Atrix 4G vs Atrix is just marketing lingo.
And when people want to say that the Droid Bionic is a real 4G device would technically be incorrect. So don't think your Atrix is in any way inferior to the Bionic (except maybe camera and screen size).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just thought I'd correct you. Tmobile has claimed they can reach speeds of up to 672mbps with their HSPA+ tech. Honestly with speeds like that is there any real need for LTE?
"Now we're seeing a chart of T-Mobile's 4G evolution on the HSPA+ technology path, starting with 21Mbps in 2010. We're seeing 28, 42, 84, 168, and 672Mbps bars here as we move through dual-carrier, MIMO, and so on."
http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/06/live-from-t-mobiles-ces-2011-press-event/
svengalis said:
"Now we're seeing a chart of T-Mobile's 4G evolution on the HSPA+ technology path, starting with 21Mbps in 2010. We're seeing 28, 42, 84, 168, and 672Mbps bars here as we move through dual-carrier, MIMO, and so on."
http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/06/live-from-t-mobiles-ces-2011-press-event/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is basically LTE. They will be switching to it eventually, and these technologies is what makes up most of it.
Just to make sure everyone's aware. Without a huge picocell/femtocell underlay, you will never see anything over 6-12 meg on an LTE network.
The difference between atrix 4g and atrix for europe could be regarding frequencies: 4g shold be 3g on frequencies 850/1900/2100 while european version 850/900/1900/2100. This should be not a problem because almost in all europe 3g works on 2100 Mhz frequency. What do you think about it?
mercuryzzz said:
The difference between atrix 4g and atrix for europe could be regarding frequencies: 4g shold be 3g on frequencies 850/1900/2100 while european version 850/900/1900/2100. This should be not a problem because almost in all europe 3g works on 2100 Mhz frequency. What do you think about it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since most 3G GSM operates in the 2100MHZ area nowadays, I don't this this is too much of a problem (if I'm wrong could someone please correct me?)
I'm now curious as to what exactly is the unlock procedure (sim-wise) of an att Atrix... Can anyone please explain (in detail) ?
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/12/samsung-galaxy-s-2-and-10-1-inch-honeycomb-tablet-leaked-on-kore/
Alright as seen above is the Galaxy S2, Mkkkkkk thats great and all but because it has HSPA+ does that mean it can be on T-Mobile only I get confused by this and think "God dammit the antenna cant be run on Sprint, there is no way we are getting that phone now" This happened with the Pre 3 too, I just need some further insight into what that spec means and how it affects which provider the phone is going too.
Cordially
Blitz
Blitzpwnage said:
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/12/samsung-galaxy-s-2-and-10-1-inch-honeycomb-tablet-leaked-on-kore/
Alright as seen above is the Galaxy S2, Mkkkkkk thats great and all but because it has HSPA+ does that mean it can be on T-Mobile only I get confused by this and think "God dammit the antenna cant be run on Sprint, there is no way we are getting that phone now" This happened with the Pre 3 too, I just need some further insight into what that spec means and how it affects which provider the phone is going too.
Cordially
Blitz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you sir would be correct, that will not work on a sprint network.
Blitzpwnage said:
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/12/samsung-galaxy-s-2-and-10-1-inch-honeycomb-tablet-leaked-on-kore/
Alright as seen above is the Galaxy S2, Mkkkkkk thats great and all but because it has HSPA+ does that mean it can be on T-Mobile only I get confused by this and think "God dammit the antenna cant be run on Sprint, there is no way we are getting that phone now" This happened with the Pre 3 too, I just need some further insight into what that spec means and how it affects which provider the phone is going too.
Cordially
Blitz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HSPA+ is run on GSM networks NOT CDMA which is what sprint and Verizon use. Hence the different stuff on each network ex. EVDO, and HSPA
I think at&t also is going to be using hspa+
swaze said:
you sir would be correct, that will not work on a sprint network.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but keep in mind that leak is coming from Korea and it's going to be at MWC so it's no surprise that it only mentions a GSM / HSPA+ version. Nothing says that there wont be a CDMA / LTE / Wimax version for Sprint / Verizon.
Sent from my HTC EVO 4G with Tapatalk
HSPA+ is what the GSM carriers are doing for 4G right now. I think ATT is going to do LTE, T-mobile doesn't plan on it...I just switched back to sprint from t-mobile and the speed difference is ridiculous. Even on 4G, I am getting half the data speeds that I did with t-mobile HSDPA. Definitely not what I expected.
When the original Galaxy S was announced, it was GSM only as well but variants came out for all the carriers. I wouldn't buy anything from Samsung though, regardless of how appealing it seems.
*sigh*
HSPA+ = GSM = AT&T, T-Mobile, and 99% of all carriers in Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia, and South America.
drmacinyasha said:
*sigh*
HSPA+ = GSM = AT&T, T-Mobile, and 99% of all carriers in Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia, and South America.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, this is such a misleading comment. Europe uses gsm exclusively but the rest of the world mostly uses cdma. Don't sigh about it. But please don't lie about it.
cdszoke said:
Wow, this is such a misleading comment. Europe uses gsm exclusively but the rest of the world mostly uses cdma. Don't sigh about it. But please don't lie about it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Um, actually most of the world uses GSM, which is why gsm phones are commonly referred to as "world phones"
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
No, phones that are gsm AND CDMA are referred to as world phones typically.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
liquidtenmillion said:
No, phones that are gsm AND CDMA are referred to as world phones typically.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, the term pre-dates combo GSM/CDMA devices and was used to refer to GSM phones since GSM networks were the predominate cell technology outside of the US (and still are).
Oh, and to the OP, HSPA+ is being marketed as "4G" currently by AT&T alongside their yet-to-be-launched LTE network. Talk about confusing You may find that with a little bit of effort,( or none at all) HSPA+ equipped devices will bet interchangeable between T-mobile and AT&T. There are also rumours that some LTE-equipped devices will be able to swap between Verizon and AT&T.
Yep..me too. Actually breaking my contract (less than a year in because of Sprints abysmal speed) as soon as Infuse, or Galaxy 2 etc break.
Can't wait for the infuse 4g .... 4.5 in screeen wow
cdszoke said:
Wow, this is such a misleading comment. Europe uses gsm exclusively but the rest of the world mostly uses cdma. Don't sigh about it. But please don't lie about it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I lived in Cambodia for five years and travelled between often to Thailand and other countries. They all use GSM...
I'm breaking contract with T-mobile. I had a G1, loved it. Got a Vibrant, it was a nightmare trying to get it to work correctly, although I can't lie, I still enjoyed having it. Got a Nexus S, too many problems, returned it. Got a MT4G, nice phone, runs smoothly, but the screen was too small and the phone itself is a bit on the ugly side.
The real determing factor for me was that Sprint has 4G in my area, all of the other providers have 3G, and T-mobile is still running on Edge. I'm within my 30 day trial period w/ Sprint and the Evo, and I'll see how it goes. I was really hoping on going w/ Verizon and the HTC Thunderbolt, but alas, it's still up-in-the-air when it will come out. Verizon is more expensive as well when it comes to data plans. And as far as the MT4G, although CM7 runs very well on it, and it is very stable, I still can't bring myself to buying a 4G phone from a company that only offers Edge in my area (supposedly the military base near here is using their 3G towers to link to Afghanistan, but that's their problem, not mine)
gessin64 said:
Can't wait for the infuse 4g .... 4.5 in screeen wow
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do yourself a favor... don't buy a Samsung device. They make good screens, I'll admit. But you'll be waiting for updates forever, and somebody won't release the code... just look at the Vibrant threads... they haven't even gotten CM6, let alone CM7.
cdszoke said:
Wow, this is such a misleading comment. Europe uses gsm exclusively but the rest of the world mostly uses cdma. Don't sigh about it. But please don't lie about it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're an idiot. The only places outside of North America that CDMA are used are sporadically in China, a carrier or two in Japan, here and there in the rest of Asia, and that's about it.
"World phones" are AT&T (since they use different frequencies than the rest of the world's GSM networks except for... Telstra in Australia?), Verizon, and Sprint phones which have extra radios that support the standard quad-band networks. That's why there's two models of the Nexus One: A T-Mobile/World model, and the AT&T model.
The future of mobile is going to be in wifi not cellular. Hspa+ is TM's trial run at nailing down seemless transfer from 4G to wifi for data and voice calls. Assuming there are not many stumbling blocks, their future (and any other wireless companies that dont want to be left behind) will be into switching to running purely off wifi towers.
It’s now confirmed. Bell has released a statement indicating that the Motorola ATRIX is going to be available on March 17th. As for the price points: $169.95 on a 3-year (with a minimum $50 voice/data plan) or for $599.95 on no-contract. Bell will also sell the Lapdock and the HD Multimedia Dock but no word on those prices were announced.
Specs of this Android have it coming with OS 2.2 with Motoblur, 1GHz NVIDIA Tegra 2 Dual-Core processor, 1GB RAM and 1930 mAh battery, Flash Player 10.1, 5-megapixel rear-facing camera with LED flash and 720p HD video recording, VGA front-facing camera, holds up to 48GB with a microSD card (16GB internal and optional 32GB), WiFi.
Who’s buying?
http://mobilesyrup.com/2011/03/04/confirmed-bell-releasing-motorola-atrix-march-17th-for-599-95/
Heres to hoping it has HSUPA enabled.
leadguy68 said:
Heres to hoping it has HSUPA enabled.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not on AT&T, so it will probably not be crippled.
zorxd said:
It's not on AT&T, so it will probably not be crippled.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HA!
You obviously don't know Canadian cell phone carriers. Bell removed FFC's from some Samsung phones. Did you notice... 3 year contract. AT&T ... 2 year.
Think AT&T is bad... at least you have real choice in the states.
yea canadian providers are the worst! - I do love Wind and Mobilicity though
As an american living in canada the US has far better cell phone service, I just wish motorola made a version that worked on wind because that's what I use... 40/mo for unlimited voice/texts/data is too hard to beat =)
Still, it's nice to see they're releasing it so soon after the US release, usually canada has to wait MONTHS for a phone to hit their side of the border.
fr0z3n said:
yea canadian providers are the worst! - I do love Wind and Mobilicity though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They are great. If you live in a metropolitan area. I'm juuust outside Oshawa, the Wind Zone ends 3 blocks from my house. Not good if I'm getting say groceries and need to call home to see if my wife needs something.
Or travelling. As much as I hate Rogers, my data usage in the states comes off my monthly balance
Well captivate owners waited months hoping for a hsupa modem from its canadian brother....no dice
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
I'm in Halifax and was about to outbid someone on ebay.... a few questions though:
1) So, can I purchase an unlock code for it?
2) Also, what GSM/3G bands will it support?
3) Finally, no 4G??
Pretty sure you can get an unlock code for any phone out there... just a matter of price. In Toronto you can just go to pacific mall and a ton of places can get it for 10 bucks or so. There's some online sites that work too but it's a bit riskier.
It'll most likely be the same exact phone that AT&T has in terms of hardware since Bell/Rogers/Telus all use the same 3G frequencies now.
And for 4G... does any carrier in canada even have 4G yet?
TareX said:
I'm in Halifax and was about to outbid someone on ebay.... a few questions though:
1) So, can I purchase an unlock code for it?
2) Also, what GSM/3G bands will it support?
3) Finally, no 4G??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm definitely buying this beast. Hoping to get it on the 17th. Been waiting since CES...
4G is a marketing gimic that means whatever you want it to.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Here's hoping we can extract the bell atrix's firmware and flash it on the gringo version to enable faster upload speeds. Designgears, what do you think?
Confirmed from Bell:
Here are the connectivity details:
•HSPA –global access
•GPRS / EDGE 850/900/1800/1900 MHz
•UMTS 850/1900/2100 MHz
•Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, GPS, Bluetooth, DLNA
He'll let me know how I can unlock it in the next email...
dinan said:
And for 4G... does any carrier in canada even have 4G yet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The announcement says: "...on Canada's Best Network with the fastest 4G speeds and largest 4G coverage..."
So I dunno why they dropped the "4G" part of the name...
http://www.cnw.ca/en/releases/archive/March2011/04/c8005.html
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/story/2011/03/02/bell-hspa-4g-network.html
Guess you've fallen for their marketing ploy... quite sure bell isn't even 3.5G. Yet they label anything faster (theoretically) than 3mbps as 4G when traditional 3G maxes out at 7.2mbps.
TareX said:
The announcement says: "...on Canada's Best Network with the fastest 4G speeds and largest 4G coverage..."
So I dunno why they dropped the "4G" part of the name...
http://www.cnw.ca/en/releases/archive/March2011/04/c8005.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
I definately dont get 3mbs
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Well, getting an unlocked, rooted Atrix 4G from the US will cost me CAD $650 ... while getting it locked from Bell would cost me CAD $600.... I'm not sure if $50 is worth worrying about unlockability and rooting...
dinan said:
Guess you've fallen for their marketing ploy... quite sure bell isn't even 3.5G. Yet they label anything faster (theoretically) than 3mbps as 4G when traditional 3G maxes out at 7.2mbps.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's like how AT&T is doing it, calling their HSPA+ 4G.
I was wondering about rooting the Atrix. The AT&T version is already rooted, would the same rooting method work for the Bell version? Would this only work if they have the exact same firmware for 2.2? I remember when I manually install updates for my Nexus One, I had to wait for the AT&T update to come out since the firmware was different than the TMo version. This was before the versions were merged. So I'm wondering if this is the case? Or does this have no relevance?
Will be getting the Bell's Atrix on the 17!
will this work on tmobile's 3G?
Will there be any difference between the 2? Is the one from the play store able to work on all of t mobiles frequencies? Thanks.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
By looking at the specs on the Google play store I'd say the lg nexus 4 should be able to operate on any north american providers gsm/HSPA+ services.
from the info out so far, it seems like T-Mobile's version will support their 42 mbps HSPA+ network while the Play Store version is only 21 mbps.
with that being said, i find it hard to believe that Google would sell this phone with 2 different radios. this same line of thinking is one of the reasons Google didn't include LTE on the Nexus 4.
i'm hoping (and assuming) that the Play Store version supports 42 mbps. if not, at least maybe some software hack could unlock 42 mbps access.
ugh, i just bought the Note 2...now debating on whether or not to return and get the Nexus 4.
tuffCookie said:
from the info out so far, it seems like T-Mobile's version will support their 42 mbps HSPA+ network while the Play Store version is only 21 mbps.
with that being said, i find it hard to believe that Google would sell this phone with 2 different radios. this same line of thinking is one of the reasons Google didn't include LTE on the Nexus 4.
i'm hoping (and assuming) that the Play Store version supports 42 mbps. if not, at least maybe some software hack could unlock 42 mbps access.
ugh, i just bought the Note 2...now debating on whether or not to return and get the Nexus 4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I really hope the HSPA+42 one will be made available for the same price as the HSPA+21 one since I am using T-Mobile.
Euler MD said:
Yeah, I really hope the HSPA+42 one will be made available for the same price as the HSPA+21 one since I am using T-Mobile.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really would like to know this too. I'm switching to T-Mobile for this phone and I need to know where to buy my phone from.
im confused on this 2...i was hoping to change into the $30 monthly plan no contract on hspa+ but...which one is it?
judoka209 said:
I really would like to know this too. I'm switching to T-Mobile for this phone and I need to know where to buy my phone from.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The play store
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
I really hope the one in playstore tmobiles 42mbps, i will instantly pay my ETF with tmobile and switch to the $30 monthly plan!
Euler MD said:
Yeah, I really hope the HSPA+42 one will be made available for the same price as the HSPA+21 one since I am using T-Mobile.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Already announced!
http://www.androidcentral.com/fyi-nexus-4-rocks-42-mbps
I'll be ecstatic if t-mobile includes Wifi UMA calling for the Tmobile release.
The T-Mobile version will be sporting the 42mbps radio, I'm torn between the Galaxy Note II and the Nexus 4. The Snapdragon S4 Pro is better than the quad core Exynos. I love the blacks on AMOLED screens since I watch movies often the screen size would be nice.
http://www.tmonews.com/2012/10/t-mobile-confirms-nexus-4-hspa-42mbps-connectivity/
Sorry for this dumb question but does the 42mbps radio make much of a difference if I'm averaging around 8-10mbps? I'm currently using the HTC One S and I know it's usng the 42mbps radio. If I get the play store version would I average lower connection speeds?
Oky guys, I am getting this for sure, but I don't wanna stuck in 2G so where should I buy it from google store or t-mobile?]
And who gonna provide the update for t-mobile version ? google or t mobile
newbieandroid said:
The T-Mobile version will be sporting the 42mbps radio...
http://www.tmonews.com/2012/10/t-mobile-confirms-nexus-4-hspa-42mbps-connectivity/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So will the Play Store version, according to the update in that same article.
Given this, there's absolutely no reason to get the contract version. You only save $150, while the cost of a contract can easily exceed $1000.
thebobp said:
So will the Play Store version, according to the update in that same article.
Given this, there's absolutely no reason to get the contract version. You only save $150, while the cost of a contract can easily exceed $1000.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your right, I was shocked when I first saw the play store version because I thought the benefit of using a Snapdragon in almost all of T-Mobiles devices dating back to the S3 in the Galaxy S3 was to get the 42mbps radio. I guess that's my next phone!
Sobit has been confirmed that the play store will use t-Mobiles 42 hdpa+? Also what is the 30 dollar a month plan on t-mobile? I'm on Verizon but I want the nexus 4
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Check this article http://www.tmonews.com/2012/10/t-mobile-confirms-nexus-4-hspa-42mbps-connectivity/
They are saying it's 42+ not 21+
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Canadian AWS carriers?
If these two are the same phones, will this work on mobilicity or wind?
Please be yes....
Are you talking about Wind in Canada? If so then yes, it will work. The nexus 4 is pentaband 3G meaning it supports all GSM bands.
42mbps or 21mbps... I was with T-Mobile for about 10 years and rarely saw 8-10mbps.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Red Wolf said:
Oky guys, I am getting this for sure, but I don't wanna stuck in 2G so where should I buy it from google store or t-mobile?]
And who gonna provide the update for t-mobile version ? google or t mobile
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A few people seem certain that there is only one version of the Nexus 4 so no difference if you get it from TMO or the Play Store. A couple of links like the one from tmo news suggest the same info from a Google Press Release but none have linked to or published the press release so we can't be sure.
So there is still not certainly from my point of view and a chance that the Play Store version will not be a TMO 42mbps version. However if that's the case, you will still get 3G and even HSPA+, it will just not be as fast. To be clear, based on feedback from others, you might get 5mbps where someone with the 42mbps version is getting 8.