hello,
i posted it in the ICS update thread:
Hey, silly question, i know, think it would be asked many times.
i wanne opend a new thread at dev, but i cant't to less comments --_--
now, we know, we never get a 3.X kernel from moto, so, we must help us at our own, i asked me, how?
my idea was, what abei the LG P990, i heard, there are 3.x kernel, no officiel, i know.
What are the hardware differences at the LG and the atrix? fingerprint and camera, i know, but what about the rest?
it it identicly? is it possible, that we can work with it? at beginning, without camera and fingerprint?
perhaps we found an other device with an identicly camera and 3.x kernel, perhaps we can look in a direction like that? only moto bashing wont help anyway
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i hope any dev get give informations to me?
the developers already know that moto left us behind..
they're talking about it and what they are going to do??..just the time will tell us...we have to wait hehe
I'm not a developer but sometimes i asked then about start the work from some other similar device's kernel (same that you're suggesting here)..they told that it's an idea but should be necessary a massive rewriting...so it's not easy and they will need time even if the device is similar..
thats the point, i think we don't have any other chance, similar devices kernel, or from scratch, the second is the option which needs more time, i think
i wanne call me a developer, nothing in comparsion with our big ones but i would like to help your devs and i think, i'm not the only one, but i don't know how - i know that is many work and needs massive rewriting, but it's our only option.
i only hope some devs would found together and can say, how we, the, i wanne call it "non-kernel-hackers" , can help.
sw0pt5 said:
Why Defy can use Froyo kernel for CM9?
Why Defy can use GB kernel for CM10?
Why Defy bootloader is locked but still have a better development?
Defy also only have GB, no ICS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure if you noticed but the defy and the atrix are two very different phones.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
sw0pt5 said:
And two group of devs
but using same kind of OS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not as simple as that. Each device is different regardless of the OS. If you think our devs aren't good enough or they aren't trying hard enough then I'm sure you know exactly how to do it so just try yourself .
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
I just ask quarx for help...
Quarx said:
Cocolopes said:
Hi quarx!
I want to ask you something...how you do to make hwa work on jb for defy?...I ask this because in atrix forum we are mad cos motorola **** us not releasen ICS...
So I think...in first time the problem on defy was the locked bootloader...but you get it work. Atrix has an unlocked bootloader..and we have Nvidia drivers...and I think there is a phone using the same tegra chip on a 2.x kernel...soooo its possible to make something?
If the answer is YES...and you know how to do it...maybe the atrix comunity can donate to you to buy an atrix...
Sorry for the bad english...and I wait for your answer..thank in advance!
from the (m)ATRIX...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need update EGL libs and kernel drvier for this libs.
Hwa should work automatically.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We have great devs working on atrix...the best ones....but we have no choice...we need help...so...
from the (m)ATRIX... no more moto!
I think atrix slowly died
sw0pt5 said:
Exactly!
Just hope someone can make a smooth CM7 with all the best tweats.
Actually, the stock ROM is quite reliable as daily driver.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
base gb on cm7 or miui
Thread moved to general and cleaned.
There will be no more flaming here.....
I know of a dev that might be able to help us, as he has made CM10 stable Kernels for many devices and might be able to help us. He goes by the name of Hashcode, I'd link to a profile but I'm on mobile at the moment x.x
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
MewRai95 said:
I know of a dev that might be able to help us, as he has made CM10 stable Kernels for many devices and might be able to help us. He goes by the name of Hashcode, I'd link to a profile but I'm on mobile at the moment x.x
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please. Any help would be appreciated.
MewRai95 said:
I know of a dev that might be able to help us, as he has made CM10 stable Kernels for many devices and might be able to help us. He goes by the name of Hashcode, I'd link to a profile but I'm on mobile at the moment x.x
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/member.php?u=4243514
i worte a message to him, i hope he can help us
i'm glad, that this thread went to the direction i thought about at starting it
Anyway, i think that our best chances is to raise a found, by donating, and offer it as a bounty for the first dev to create a 3.x kernel for our device. We might find someone that way. Create that kernel takes lots of time and skills. Very very few people are willing to invest all the time required for free.
djluis48 said:
Anyway, i think that our best chances is to raise a found, by donating, and offer it as a bounty for the first dev to create a 3.x kernel for our device. We might find someone that way. Create that kernel takes lots of time and skills. Very very few people are willing to invest all the time required for free.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agree
Cocolopes said:
I just ask quarx for help...
We have great devs working on atrix...the best ones....but we have no choice...we need help...so...
from the (m)ATRIX... no more moto!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got a response?
MewRai95 said:
I know of a dev that might be able to help us, as he has made CM10 stable Kernels for many devices and might be able to help us. He goes by the name of Hashcode, I'd link to a profile but I'm on mobile at the moment x.x
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes hashcode is awesome developer and he has got kexec working one the droid razr/razr maxxx, bionoic and droid 3 I think..
djluis48 said:
Got a response?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes...but I think he didnt have time to help us...
quarxs said:
You need update EGL libs and kernel drvier for this libs.
Hwa should work automatically.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
from the (m)ATRIX...
I too have sent Hashcode a message asking for possible assistance. I told him we would be willing to donate to the cause.
If you can organise a decent fund/development device, I'd recommend contacting TripNRaVeR. He has experience porting the vanilla 3.1.10 Tegra kernel code to a new device (the One X, which shipped with 2.6.39) hence he's probably already halfway there with knowing where to go next. It looks like LG and Sammy have ditched DVFS in their 3.1.10 releases on the Galaxy R and O2X, which would be nice (using standard governors )
Related
Anyone smarter than me know if we can work off of this at all?
supercurio said:
See, you just need to ask
Galaxy S with Nexus S kernel - Booting Nexus S Android Gingerbread
Videos are here:
http://www.youtube.com/supercurioxda
What's about this port:
- It uses the Nexus S kernel compiled from sources
- It runs the exact /system image release, we dumped yesterday. (I spent the night of it so it's still the same day!)
Am i French ?
Now you don't have any doubt anymore
Which filesystem ?
This early preview runs on Ext4. no RFS at all, the kernel don't support RFS.
Does everything work ?
Nope, but I must admit I didn't expect such a result.
Don't work: GPS / Voice / Wifi / some Buttons / camera
Work: everything else: like sound, GL acceleration etc
Will it work ?
I think most of it will work after countless hours spent on it.
Is it flashable with Odin ?
That's a good idea <Gregounech>, i think i'll do that tomorrow.
Do you work alone ?
I worked alone to produce this preview, but not to produce the dump yesterday.
Credits go the IRC channel #NSdev on freenode !
What about a team ?
That's the goal. Rendez-vous on IRC so we can produce ports and improve the quality very fast of this.
Is this opensource ?
Everything will be released after i get some sleep!
Edit: for inpatients, I pushed the latest initramfs : https://github.com/project-voodoo/nsonsgs-initramfs
Articles:
http://briefmobile.com/samsung-galaxy-s-android-2-3-gingerbread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
Yea I read this too.. Hopefully fascinate gets a port
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Not sure. Still more or less a noob dev. Not sure how difficult it its to adapt the gsm port for cdma. thoughts anyone?
Would definitely be interested in seeing this happen.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
pfarrelliv said:
Not sure. Still more or less a noob dev. Not sure how difficult it its to adapt the gsm port for cdma. thoughts anyone?
Would definitely be interested in seeing this happen.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been obsessively following efforts at cyanogen forums and this forum... i am pretty on top of things, and i am NOT aware of any success taking kernels/roms/images from GSM and having them work on CDMA...damn right depressing
The problem is deeper than just kernel. There are fundamental issues as to why we're not already on 2.2...
I'd go into it, but this thread isn't about that. Plus, I am not a programmer, so I don't want to overstep my bounds.
It's significantly easier to port things on GSM versions of phones. We likely won't see it until at least Froyo is working on our devices, possibly later. This also shouldn't be in the Development forum...
RacerXFD said:
The problem is deeper than just kernel. There are fundamental issues as to why we're not already on 2.2...
I'd go into it, but this thread isn't about that. Plus, I am not a programmer, so I don't want to overstep my bounds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd really like someone to help me understand (in noob terms) why porting is so hard for CDMA devices. Expect a thanks if you can explain it to me!
A thanks is what I am not after. It's that for anyone that has had this device since september this topic has been beaten to death.
Give this a read.
good day.
chopper the dog said:
A thanks is what I am not after. It's that for anyone that has had this device since september this topic has been beaten to death.
Give this a read.
good day.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, thanks anyway. I haven't had the device since September.
I just wanted to remind anyone new to Fascinate Modding, that there is NO GINGERBREAD ROM for the SAMSUNG FASCINATE at this time.
So if you are itching to flash a ROM from a different phone. Please DO NOT BE MISLED by this thread and flash Gingerbread for a i9000.
You have a Galaxy S Variant, Not the Galaxy S phone.
Even though the news started as X8 bootloader unlocked, right now there is no one for us making a new kernal.....
For x10 mini they have already one kernal and for x10 mini pro work is in progress....
Yeah, just wait...
Sent from my X8 using XDA App
How come they already have kernelsfor x10 mini? if this takes months
Sent from my Shakira using XDA App
It takes shortly if the dev just improves the kernel (2.6.29 one)
But it takes long if they gonna make a all new kernel.
We just have to wait. Consider this as a good news. This is way better that we are expecting into something good rather than nothing at all. Right sandy
Our patience will achieve more than our force.
Allow being hostile at every given oppertunity that just destroys the purpose of a community
Questioner said:
Our patience will achieve more than our force.
Allow being hostile at every given oppertunity that just destroys the purpose of a community
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah everyone, just wait patiently. Devs take such a long time because they are making a good new kernel .
by the way who is working on a kernel?
Questioner said:
by the way who is working on a kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
maybe some great devs already workin on it or not
deedii said:
We just have to wait. Consider this as a good news. This is way better that we are expecting into something good rather than nothing at all. Right sandy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya!!! Hope We will also have better kernels soon!!!!
oh dear. Better go play with your friends then opening useless threads.
zvorkapic.os said:
oh dear. Better go play with your friends then opening useless threads.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is general section lol!!!!
Just wanted to know what you guys think on this or if someone know that a kernel is already work in progress by someone....thats why I started this thread....I havent spammed any dev thread or something...I hope so.....
Anyway if I am wrong some mod can del this thread...and in that case sorry in adv....
Take care guys!!!!
Kernel development doesnt take months.my friend can compile it for two or three days.you just have to know C++ good.
Well, it can be compiled in 15 minutes, plus 10 seconds more to pack it (if you already have ramdisk).
But the problem is that NAND initialization is broken in SE's kernel source.
Blagus said:
Well, it can be compiled in 15 minutes, plus 10 seconds more to pack it (if you already have ramdisk).
But the problem is that NAND initialization is broken in SE's kernel source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about x10 minis.
Blagus said:
Well, it can be compiled in 15 minutes, plus 10 seconds more to pack it (if you already have ramdisk).
But the problem is that NAND initialization is broken in SE's kernel source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wouldn't it be possible to simply use a newer kernel from a non-SE phone which has roughly the same hardware components as X8?
Btw Blagus, I sent you a PM. Please respond.
Both Mini and Mini Pro already have custom kernel, very soon it will come to X8.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1253787
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1256095
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1254202
I think this is very good i dont mind waiting for new kernel we have many good roms to use till then
Sent from my X8 using XDA Premium App
FreeXperia team is working on a kernel.
Link: https://github.com/freexperia/semc-kernel-msm7x27
It's the SEMC MSM7227 devices kernel with some goodies added .
xperiauser132 said:
Kernel development doesnt take months.my friend can compile it for two or three days.you just have to know C++ good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's need a month even a year to develop for me, I don't know C++
For now, we can just wait for our developers to compile them.
check this tread guyz.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1278328
Its coming soon.
Yuppieee!
josephnero said:
check this tread guyz.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1278328
Its coming soon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Such great news, man! I cried a little! XD
Now if we could only get MIUI too... *sigh*
crimilde said:
Such great news, man! I cried a little! XD
Now if we could only get MIUI too... *sigh*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
still,its better than nothing right?
Do we now if the camera will work in this official CM7??
If so, great news, I'd unlock my bootloader for sure!
What's the release date of the CM7-Version that supports our beloved Xperia devices? I guess it would be something like CM7 7.1.0RC2 or even 7.2.0!
josephnero said:
still,its better than nothing right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course, I'm really happy that finally us Xperia owners are getting some attention.
ZuLa said:
Do we now if the camera will work in this official CM7??
If so, great news, I'd unlock my bootloader for sure!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes we would
I mean yes it will.with unlocked bootloader everything will work
Sent from my X10i using xda premium
Finally, one great reason to unlock the bootloader... and to stick with my phone lol.
lawgone said:
Finally, one great reason to unlock the bootloader... and to stick with my phone lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agreed
100000words
I'm sorry but I'm a bootleg idiot! What does all this mean?
Sent from my LT15i using XDA Premium App
I'm not sure if this was mentioned anywhere else, but:
http://blogs.sonyericsson.com/wp/2011/09/28/sony-ericsson-supports-independent-developers/
SE supports the FreeXperia team.
I appreciate their attitude towards custom roms and independent developers.
crimilde said:
I'm not sure if this was mentioned anywhere else, but:
http://blogs.sonyericsson.com/wp/2011/09/28/sony-ericsson-supports-independent-developers/
SE supports the FreeXperia team.
I appreciate their attitude towards custom roms and independent developers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Amazing news!! I think we can expect great things for our xperia phones in the near future.
Congratulations to the freexperia team you guys have certainly got yourselfs noticed. B-)
Sent from my LT15i using XDA Premium App
Hehe
Now you are exhilarated aren't you ?
Regards
@Bin4ry: When can we expect the CM7-Release?
Btw Great work guys!!! I'm really thrilled now... and for the future!!!!
It will be released with next CM release round
Regards
Bin4ry said:
It will be released with next CM release round
Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What phone did you get?
Sorry guys
But I dont understand what the benefits of this are?
For the Noobs like me, can someone please explain how this is better then the SE rom?
And should we do this once it comes out????
Devilbabi said:
Sorry guys
But I dont understand what the benefits of this are?
For the Noobs like me, can someone please explain how this is better then the SE rom?
And should we do this once it comes out????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quoth Wikipedia:
CyanogenMod is an aftermarket firmware for over forty cell phones and tablets based on the open-source Android operating system.
It offers features not found in the official Android-based firmwares of vendors of these devices, including native theming support (also known as the "T-Mobile Theme Engine"), a codec for the Free Lossless Audio Codec (FLAC), compressed cache (compcache), a large APN list, an OpenVPN client, a reboot menu, support for Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and USB tethering, toggles in the notification pull-down (such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, GPS, and many more), as well as other enhancements. CyanogenMod was also the first mobile OS to incorporate BFS as the task scheduler, a change that has been merged into experimental branches in the official Android source tree.
CyanogenMod claims to increase performance and reliability over official firmware releases.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So yeah, it offers a lot of features not included in official ROMs, and very useful ones indeed. But if you don't plan on using them / don't need to, I guess it's better to stay on stock? That's up to you to decide, after balancing out the pros and cons.
You should also keep in mind that you might void your warranty if you choose to install a custom ROM.
In my opinion, SE stock ROM is better than most other vendors', but CyanogenMod is the best.
Hey everyone, please support our phone to receive official CyanogenMod Team support...
here's the link:
http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/...pport-for-gt540/page__pid__285185#entry285185
How to support,register give you a thanks and replay ? Sure.I don't understand CM team,HTC Click (TATTO) has offical support and we don't ? :S
Comment the thread, asking for support.
It was asked once but... Mikegapinski started but no update. (dec 20.)
m4nu4l said:
Comment the thread, asking for support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Done.
wwenigma said:
It was asked once but... Mikegapinski started but no update. (dec 20.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Write again in new thread,maybe this time they will add Mike to CM 7 team,and our device to official CM7 list.
i updated my thread, also everyone, please share that thread everywhere you can, we need as much support as possible, we need to get attention
BUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
on cm forum some moderator asked to call some dev's to leave replay i asked mike and he sad :
Michał Gapinski
I don't want to do it
TBH, CyanogenMOD team seems to be a bunch of HTC fanboys.
I have contacted them via CM forums a year ago and none of the admins replied
Im kinda agree with what the mod said, our phone is kinda oldie, most of us are thinking on changin our phones this year! or anything! + we got plenty of stable roms that we can actually use as daily and main ones, all we need is developers, not the CM team support as well! And im not saying I disagree, cause i'd love the CM support, more complete roms or anything, but its a waste of time and maybe resources for a phone thats obsolete, plus, we're actually thinking on changing (must of us) even if we love it (I do love it)! Instead of asking CM support we should find dev's or learn and practice with it
not to burst ur bubble but they already said no to mike
P500 got official CM..
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
yes u guys are more active(more ppl more devs) ours is almost dead
dnle71 said:
P500 got official CM..
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
really? it's only for the 2X
MrAndroid12 said:
really? it's only for the 2X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes p500 got it because they have more users & devs and official 2.3
Really, GT540 will be dead soon I think. Mike got new Xperia NeoV, pcfighter don't release anything now too, Mur4ik left long time ago, Wingrime is still active, but releases are just from time to time, something still need to be done. DevSwift has Desire S, so Swift is his 2nd phone, which he don't care about that much.
Many others also changed phone, swift became less active than like 2-3 months ago.
Well, I'm currently trying to develop, and if I can get my fastboot to work, I'm going to make ROM's, so there is hope I'm trying to port a ROM from the p500, you may guess which one!
Sent from my GT540 using Tapatalk
Miracle ?
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_device_lge_swift
No miracle, only pcfighter!
imma confused meaning???
Usually, (for other devices of course), ICS roms that are developed from AOSP tend to be more stable, less buggy and better than CM9 roms, so im kind of curious why Atrix developers have decided to work on CM9, even thought its far from complete?
Just a question.
djluis48 said:
Usually, (for other devices of course), ICS roms that are developed from AOSP tend to be more stable, less buggy and better than CM9 roms, so im kind of curious why Atrix developers have decided to work on CM9, even thought its far from complete?
Just a question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
because CM9 is what we all want in the end.
djluis48 said:
Usually, (for other devices of course), ICS roms that are developed from AOSP tend to be more stable, less buggy and better than CM9 roms, so im kind of curious why Atrix developers have decided to work on CM9, even thought its far from complete?
Just a question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not 100% but I think the developers need something from the moto/nvidia which is why the rom was ported from the photon and not just built From the ground up .
Again not 100%
Sent from the Atrix of Chuck Norris.
djluis48 said:
Usually, (for other devices of course), ICS roms that are developed from AOSP tend to be more stable, less buggy and better than CM9 roms, so im kind of curious why Atrix developers have decided to work on CM9, even thought its far from complete?
Just a question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NVidia won't release the drivers and sources required to accomplish this, so a 1/2 ass port is all that can be done at the moment. This has nothing to do with the devs. They are giving us the best they can with what they have right now.
djluis48 said:
Usually, (for other devices of course), ICS roms that are developed from AOSP tend to be more stable, less buggy and better than CM9 roms, so im kind of curious why Atrix developers have decided to work on CM9, even thought its far from complete?
Just a question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please open eyes before posting. Development are working hard and doing what they can.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
JayRolla said:
Please open eyes before posting. Development are working hard and doing what they can.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not saying that they arent working hard, just asking why they choosing CM9 instead of AOSP 4.0, just a simple question. And ponting out that builds based on AOSP seems to be more solid and stable than builds based on CM9, mostly because CM9 itself its still not from complete
Sent from my MB860 using XDA
Also, IIRC, they're borrowing heavily from CM7 for our current CM9 builds. I believe we'll see more options when we finally get official source and drivers in Q3.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
CaelanT said:
NVidia won't release the drivers and sources required to accomplish this, so a 1/2 ass port is all that can be done at the moment. This has nothing to do with the devs. They are giving us the best they can with what they have right now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please read the above before commenting again! If you had read it the first time you would not have posted what you did below!.............Or maybe you still would have, who knows!!! You can program all you want for an AOSP ROM, but without device specific drivers you can never optimize for any one device. Simple as this, for any ICS on the Atrix, whether AOSP, CM9, MIUI, or whatever, you still need device drivers. Try running your NVidia graphics card in your computer without a driver................yeah, see what I mean (but then again you might like 640 x 480!)!
djluis48 said:
Not saying that they arent working hard, just asking why they choosing CM9 instead of AOSP 4.0, just a simple question. And ponting out that builds based on AOSP seems to be more solid and stable than builds based on CM9, mostly because CM9 itself its still not from complete
Sent from my MB860 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
BTW...........Please link the AOSP 4.0 builds for the Atrix you are referring to!
CaelanT said:
Please read the above before commenting again! If you had read it the first time you would not have posted what you did below!.............Or maybe you still would have, who knows!!! You can program all you want for an AOSP ROM, but without device specific drivers you can never optimize for any one device. Simple as this, for any ICS on the Atrix, whether AOSP, CM9, MIUI, or whatever, you still need device drivers. Try running your NVidia graphics card in your computer without a driver................yeah, see what I mean (but then again you might like 640 x 480!)!
BTW...........Please link the AOSP 4.0 builds for the Atrix you are referring to!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're rude.
Purple Drama Llama said:
You're rude.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No! I already answered the question earlier in the thread, but OP obviously is not reading and persists.
Both my posts were quite nice actually!
Bye!
BTW, why no comment about this post being rude?:
JayRolla said:
Please open eyes before posting. Development are working hard and doing what they can.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CaelanT said:
BTW...........Please link the AOSP 4.0 builds for the Atrix you are referring to![/B]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Woops, i forgot to tell that i was refering to other devices AOSP 4.0 ROMS, but if you are as inteligent as you seems to be, you should have known that because the Atrix actually doesn't have any rom coded from AOPS 4.0, at least on this forum.
The roms i was refering to was ICS Passion and ICS Euforia, both made by the same developer, Neobuddy, made for the Samsung Vibrant, a 1ghz phone, with 512mb for ram, without official drivrrs released, and the rom is more stable than the current Atrix ICS builds (no offend, i recongnize the guys are doing a great job making it happen), and almost as smooth as a the builds, and that phone is in a similar condition driver-related, that its, without any drivers being released. Thats why my doubt came, why the developers chiosed CM9 as a base, even thought it isnt really stable yet, and not completed, and why builds made from AOSP 4.0 tend to be more stable?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA
djluis48 said:
Woops, i forgot to tell that i was refering to other devices AOSP 4.0 ROMS, but if you are as inteligent as you seems to be, you should have known that because the Atrix actually doesn't have any rom coded from AOPS 4.0, at least on this forum.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And that's why I asked you to link them. You are comparing AOSP ROM's on other devices to CM9 on other devices. Because you see something run more smoothly on one device, does not directly mean it will run smoothly on another device. In any event, your question was answered in as far as there are drivers and source that the devs do not have in order to make any ICS based ROM's work optimally on the Atrix. If I had to hazard a guess as to why the devs are using CM9 as a base, it would be because the groundwork has been laid for them. The Atrix doesn't have an army of devs, so we get a smaller mix of options with ROM's.
CaelanT said:
And that's why I asked you to link them. You are comparing AOSP ROM's on other devices to CM9 on other devices. Because you see something run more smoothly on one device, does not directly mean it will run smoothly on another device. In any event, your question was answered in as far as there are drivers and source that the devs do not have in order to make any ICS based ROM's work optimally on the Atrix. If I had to hazard a guess as to why the devs are using CM9 as a base, it would be because the groundwork has been laid for them. The Atrix doesn't have an army of devs, so we get a smaller mix of options with ROM's.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The OP was asking why the Atrix doesn't have AOSP ROM's.. so you.. ask him to link them?
I've been lurking around the forums since the release of this phone and you have got to be one of my favorite posters so far, give me a good laugh every time.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Celidonius said:
The OP was asking why the Atrix doesn't have AOSP ROM's.. so you.. ask him to link them?
I've been lurking around the forums since the release of this phone and you have got to be one of my favorite posters so far, give me a good laugh every time.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wrote something about that yesterday but in the mist of trying to add a pic xda app fc'd.
+1
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
I kind of think I get what the OP is asking. He's asking why build a really souped up race car where as a regular car is just as fine. Seems like he's not picky and he would be content with anything stable vs anything available now. But that's another thread isn't it?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA