Database Users

Which kernel are you seeing the best battery life with?

I wanted to start this poll in an endeavor to get the most battery life out of our precious Nexus Ones. I threw it in Development specifically so that Devs could use the information derived off here to make improvements. I'm on Enoms ROM which seems to get the best feedback around here for battery life.

wrong place my friend.

rheza02 said:
wrong place my friend.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If this is the consensus, mods - please move with my apologies.

Pershoot didn't make the list? If it wasn't for him there wouldn't even be a poll

Pershoot kernel...

I'll put money down now there won't be much of a consensus. Too many variables. My sig shows what is best for me. Diet K 850 AVS. Others I know will say either it was too unstable or they had terrible battery. I had terrible battery with Stock N1, and every one of Modaco Desire Alphas thru A21. Just my 2c

I accidentally voted Ivan when i meant to vote intersectraven avs

pershoot. how come it's not in the list?

wind0zer said:
pershoot. how come it's not in the list?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 ........

irishrally said:
+1 ........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 pershoot was one of the early adopters of this, please add to poll so i can vote for him!

wind0zer said:
pershoot. how come it's not in the list?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tell me about it! Most everyone's kernel uses pershoot's work in one way or another... not a knock at all, by the way... but to exclude pershoot from the poll is like not including cyan in a poll of who makes the best cooked ROM, or Modaco in a poll of best Desire ROM.
And speaking of Cyan, why is he not on the list either? cyan kernel is the basis for a lot of kernels as well.

Sorry guys. I didn't include pershoot because AVS should have better battery life. Have you guys TRIED AVS? I can't edit the poll.

ya most have tried it but it doesnt like alot of cpus so give pershoot some love!!!

hah2110 said:
Sorry guys. I didn't include pershoot because AVS should have better battery life. Have you guys TRIED AVS? I can't edit the poll.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AVS being better than the regular is theoretically correct. As you may have read in the description of all AVS kernels that they come with a disclaimer that it may or may not work. I tried AVS kernels a bunch of times and never worked for me. It's at an expermiental stage - much like dalvik as of now.

lmao... OP said "our precious".... not knocking you OP but come on thats funny

hah2110 said:
Sorry guys. I didn't include pershoot because AVS should have better battery life. Have you guys TRIED AVS? I can't edit the poll.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try creating another thread with a complete list of choices

Best IntersectRaven Kernel

This is a informational poll to help some people choose between the different types of kernels that IntersectRaven offers.

wrong subforum buddy, ask this on general.

Why would I put this in General forums?? It is about kernels which is categorized as development since it isnt an app or core function

It's a poll about kernels, but has nothing to with development.

Ok. Well sorry you feel that way.. If it bothers you that bad.. just put some white-out on your monitor where this topic is in the topic listing so you want have to see it!! Thanks

Play nice fellas...

playin4sheezy said:
Ok. Well sorry you feel that way.. If it bothers you that bad.. just put some white-out on your monitor where this topic is in the topic listing so you want have to see it!! Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im sorry, but this response is full of win. I applaud you sir.

LOL im just having a little fun. No harm

I will leave this thread in its place since I don't think it would make much sense in the General section. While it isn't development per say, it isn't like saying "what do you like better WM or Android?"

playin4sheezy said:
LOL im just having a little fun. No harm
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
get out

get out????
uhhhh.. what am i getting out of???
A poll that could give people a better choice of which kernel to go with???
or
A thread that is filled with intelligence and good information provided by you??

How about lets stick to the topic and talk about advantages/disadvantages and information about battery life for each of the different kernels.
SOUNDS GOOD TO ME

kinda point less since IntersectRaven updates kernels almost daily how bout just read his thread/posts which state the obvious and continue the discussion of his kernels on his thread..

I voted even though I only used one of these.

14hrs gone, 42% left on 925 CFS! Truly awesome compared to stock, this is my company phone so wifi use and call time is high!

Thanks for the feedback!

i use the 925 cfs but i've not tried the others.
I have tried the bfs one but it was a bit buggy for me to try battery life testing

Enndr said:
get out
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I second this

I feel lonely on 800mv BFS now. Nobody else? Really?

mikroN1 said:
I second this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW!!! Thanks alot for your input. Really helps us see which one is better... After all the bashers, you were still nice enough to help out with your wits.. THANKS ALOT MAN!

New Kernel?

I would like to build a new Kernel for the EVO...
I know some of the kernels we have for Gingerbread
have been apparently EOL'ed prematurely.
This is for a development of a new kernel but if it
is in the wrong section then please move this to the
right place.
I would like to build a new kernel with ALL the governors
built in them.
Smartass
SmartassV2
Interactive
InteractiveX
Lagfree
Conservative
Userspace
Powersave
Ondemand
Perfromance
Could anybody help with this??

for sense, PM lithid or netarchy
for AOSP, PM Carnairb
good luck, and please include SBC

you will need to first decide if you are making it for Sense or AOSP - I would then recommend checking out threads with kernels made by dev's here (such as this thread by Lithid) as it has source links to help you out. I myself have no idea how to compile one, just wanted to help ya out some

I'd love a kernel based on the latest OTA, but with the ability to over and underclock, and with all the governors. I like the latest OTA kernel, but I miss the battery savings I can get with SetCpu.

usmaak said:
I'd love a kernel based on the latest OTA, but with the ability to over and underclock, and with all the governors. I like the latest OTA kernel, but I miss the battery savings I can get with SetCpu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try the Freedom kernels. I'm using the agressive kernel and get about the same level of battery life I did when running SBC Savage Zen on AOSP and they are built off the stock HTC kernels.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1192529

srry but im looking for a great kernel or rom with wireless tethering in it been looking at shooter and destroyer roms wow those two seem to have tons of stuff to play with and have fun with and good looks but at the bottom of all this i need and must have wireless tethering working above it all then the good stuff figures in can some one please tell me what im looking for and where i can get it or should i just use one of the two listed above ive been checking out??? thankx

gnmii1969 said:
srry but im looking for a great kernel or rom with wireless tethering in it been looking at shooter and destroyer roms wow those two seem to have tons of stuff to play with and have fun with and good looks but at the bottom of all this i need and must have wireless tethering working above it all then the good stuff figures in can some one please tell me what im looking for and where i can get it or should i just use one of the two listed above ive been checking out??? thankx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think destroyer is not updating anymore but GW is constantly updating is ROM working on putting leedroid tweaks on it. But if tethering is what you're looking for then there's an app for that. But shooter is the IMHO the best sense 3.0 there is.
Sent from my Power Shooter E3D 4G with the Anthrax Sounds Jams by Wolf.

gnmii1969 said:
srry but im looking for a great kernel or rom with wireless tethering in it been looking at shooter and destroyer roms wow those two seem to have tons of stuff to play with and have fun with and good looks but at the bottom of all this i need and must have wireless tethering working above it all then the good stuff figures in can some one please tell me what im looking for and where i can get it or should i just use one of the two listed above ive been checking out??? thankx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SOS (swagged out stock) is nice it has tether built in I'm pretty sure. With an aggressive freedom kernel you get great battery life.
Well it depends really
Sense-SOS+Aggressive freedom
AOSP-MIUI+Tiamet 3.3.7
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App

This thread.. ..fail
If someone wants to learn to build a kernel, question belongs in Q%A. Equally, all the posts about ROM suggestions has nothing to do with kernels or kernal development
Aye, how this forum has fallen. Just sayin.
Sent from my PC36100 using xda premium

Polar thanks I did flash shooter ROM yesterday it is a great ROM has everything I want for now including tethering and everything looks great n works GW has done a great job with this ROM avian thanks to you and Gw for Rom and all those who have helped me
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App

scottspa74 said:
This thread.. ..fail
If someone wants to learn to build a kernel, question belongs in Q%A. Equally, all the posts about ROM suggestions has nothing to do with kernels or kernal development
Aye, how this forum has fallen. Just sayin.
Sent from my PC36100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1! Unfortunately...
The lady's man

scottspa74 said:
This thread.. ..fail
If someone wants to learn to build a kernel, question belongs in Q%A. Equally, all the posts about ROM suggestions has nothing to do with kernels or kernal development
Aye, how this forum has fallen. Just sayin.
Sent from my PC36100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah yeah, some of us were reminded not to flame while the mods has time to move the post to correct section.
Since this hasn't been moved yet OP, wrong forum and use google. Download the code, build and compile. Not rocket surgery.

I don't think we will see a new kernel till the source code is released for the new ota kernel. Just my opinion. Would love to see one before that though.
Sent from my Modded MikG Evo... It's easier this way.

alaman68 said:
Yeah yeah, some of us were reminded not to flame while the mods has time to move the post to correct section.
Since this hasn't been moved yet OP, wrong forum and use google. Download the code, build and compile. Not rocket surgery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank You! about reminding them not to complain! I had
asked them to move it as needed in which this is a Development
area of the phone.....
I am not very good at building and compiling unfortunately
so was why I was asking for a combined effort on building a new
kernel....Nobody was making anything new (FroYo had TONS
of kernels) I had PM'ed Lithid and I have gotten nothing back...
All I wanted from him was on how to add the governors...
I use nothing but his kernel and I get nothing in response..hmm
anyways I think I will be asking a different user/modder/complier
for help from now on... (and maybe switching kernels)
Oh well....it was a lost cause I guess :/
This post has gotten well over 1k views and a lot of buzz...
there are people who want a new kernel just from the looks of it!

je2854 said:
Thank You! about reminding them not to complain! I had
asked them to move it as needed in which this is a Development
area of the phone.....
I am not very good at building and compiling unfortunately
so was why I was asking for a combined effort on building a new
kernel....Nobody was making anything new (FroYo had TONS
of kernels) I had PM'ed Lithid and I have gotten nothing back...
All I wanted from him was on how to add the governors...
I use nothing but his kernel and I get nothing in response..hmm
anyways I think I will be asking a different user/modder/complier
for help from now on... (and maybe switching kernels)
Oh well....it was a lost cause I guess :/
This post has gotten well over 1k views and a lot of buzz...
there are people who want a new kernel just from the looks of it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Definitely would love a new kernel myself! Lithid has a 3d now so I doubt he will get back to you. He is kinda sharp tongued as well. I'm sure someone will help. I would but I have no idea... Be persistent, it'll pay off.
Sent from my Modded Classic Evo... It's easier this way.

pmacevad said:
Definitely would love a new kernel myself! Lithid has a 3d now so I doubt he will get back to you. He is kinda sharp tongued as well. I'm sure someone will help. I would but I have no idea... Be persistent, it'll pay off.
Sent from my Modded Classic Evo... It's easier this way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lithid has an att sgs2
We are legion, for we are many.

If you go on HTC EVO hacks he has a guide on how to build your own kernel .I'm sorry I have no links
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App

The very first thing you need to compile a kernel is setup a Linux box if you're unfamiliar with Linux you might as well try to learn to read hieroglyphs cuz that's what trying to compile a kernel in Linux with no knowledge of the OS is gonna seem like, coding is done in string from a konsole no GUI easy to make a typo and screw the whole.code up of suggest getting familiar with some basic source before diving into kernels maybe open up your favorite rom and manually input pvyparts battery bar code then go from there that's a simple few lines of code that need to.be decompiled edited and recompiled
We are legion, for we are many.

-EViL-KoNCEPTz- said:
The very first thing you need to compile a kernel is setup a Linux box if you're unfamiliar with Linux you might as well try to learn to read hieroglyphs cuz that's what trying to compile a kernel in Linux with no knowledge of the OS is gonna seem like, coding is done in string from a konsole no GUI easy to make a typo and screw the whole.code up of suggest getting familiar with some basic source before diving into kernels maybe open up your favorite rom and manually input pvyparts battery bar code then go from there that's a simple few lines of code that need to.be decompiled edited and recompiled
We are legion, for we are many.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use full blown linux and I know how to use the command very well...Just need to know where
to get all the stuff at to where I CAN cook up a new kernel lol

Source code at htcdev, or use am existing kernel as base.
Check out existing github accounts and look under commits, sometimes individual modifications are on a single commit and you can see how they did it.
Follow lithid's walk through to get a sense on how to compile a kernel before you start tweaking it. This will also help you get the packages needed to do kernel work. Sorry I don't have the link on my phone.
You can also google how to compile sense kernels for more info..
Remember when you add everything into it, modules, governors, etc..it makes the kernel bulkier, and in some cases slower.
Good luck to you on your quest. Remember to that research is key

[KERNEL][INFO][2012-10-18] _thalamus Nexus S kernels - Stable & Test releases

Hi everyone!
I just got permission from _thalamus to host a separate thread here for his Nexus S kernel developments. This is purely an informational thread and all credit goes to the man himself, _thalamus, for his great work on crespo kernels. Consequently, any bugs you wish to report or any feature request you'd like to make, it might be better to just leave a comment on the corresponding blog posts for that release. However, whenever necessary, I will report any major issues directly to him, but I for one cannot promise resolution as I'm no developer. My role in this thread is simply as moderator of sorts, as _thalamus wants that I keep the thread clean and on-topic.
In this thread, I will include links to his blog posts where you can download his most recent releases as well as some snippets and changelogs when appropriate. Let's make this into a fun and friendly medium of discussion where we can help each other out for the benefit of the community. Links below:
Get the latest Jelly Bean kernel release in this post.
Thanks to:
* _thalamus
* Google
* xda-developers forum community
* my wife and little baby girl

Frequently Asked Questions (or Moaners' Manual)
I decided to make this post more useful so I'll be slowly updating this FAQ as the need arises. For the moment, the item below is just to address the common queries that's been asked in the thread.
Why don't you add BLN/BLD/Vooodoo Color/SuperAwesome governor/etc?
From _thalamus' post here:
Also, the more (unnecessary) garbage I add, the more my kernel becomes a clone of the many slow, buggy kernels on XDA which need 1.4GHz overclock just to run the additional kernel code they have added...
I don't want that, and I'm sure the majority of the users would prefer the kernel to stay as it is, lean and stable because none of the others are.
I don't understand why some users want my kernel project to become a clone of all the other kernels?
I added voodoo sound as a compromise, because I was pestered to death for it and because when I tested it I was actually impressed by the improvement it makes to the sound. If it hadn't made a difference I would not have added it.
Voodoo colour I have no such feelings over, I don't see the point and I don't feel it adds any value to my kernel. The panel is pretty much calibrated correctly and the temperature is correct compared with similar devices with similar panels, it doesn't need adjustment.
If I added voodoo colour, it would next be BLN which is important to somebody else, and if I add that it will be something else, and so on, until it just becomes a crappy clone with the same 'features' as all the others.
So apologies, but the final decision is that I'm not adding it, period.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For those who really need BLN, see a community contribution by madd0g, shared in his post here.
What is the battery life with this kernel?
From _thalamus' post here:
Seriously...I despair of the battery life equals kernel people. I keep saying over and over again that the kernel has a minimal impact to battery life. Some people don't get it clearly.
The only time the kernel could affect battery life negatively is when there is a bug, and there aren't any bugs in the stable release affecting battery life, I know that through a lot of testing myself and testing from others. Any battery life issues you are having are caused by your ROM and apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is IDLE2?
For more information on IDLE2, _thalamus' new development that may be a replacement for the mostly unstable Deep Idle mod, please follow the links below:
_thalamus hacking blog post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
xda forums development thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Great job....
I'm loving both thalamus kernel and Oxygen Rom

Great to see that _thalamus Kernel joins XDA.
Thanks.

doa4ever said:
Great to see that _thalamus Kernel joins XDA.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
_thamalus didnt joined XDA.... Someone hosted the kernel here, not him...

Thanks for the enthusiasm guys. I think _thalamus' kernels have always been lurking here in xda, like in the Oxygen ROM threads, but I feel like it also deserves its own since it's really a great alternative in it's own right.
Sent from my Nexus S

Thamalus kernel is great but lack of voodoo color is really hard for me. It would be great if thamalus adds voodoo color. I‘m not complaining but this is what i think.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2

ljordan2 said:
Thamalus kernel is great but lack of voodoo color is really hard for me. It would be great if thamalus adds voodoo color. I‘m not complaining but this is what i think.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better read info before posting, it doesnt lack voodoo, its integrated...

rijads said:
Better read info before posting, it doesnt lack voodoo, its integrated...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
false.
voodoo sound is implemented, not voodoo color.

i only have an i9023 so i can't really confirm on the voodoo color, but i listen to music extensively and i feel like the voodoo sound module is implemented well. i tried other stock-ish kernels like simplekernel but somehow, at least to me, it sounded like voodoo improvements weren't as obvious as in other kernels, like air or matr1x. in my experience, music sounds the best when i'm using the latest experimental releases by _thalamus. i can't really explain why this is, it just sounded that way to my untrained ear.

Thanks, but i've never used this kernel before, and I have heard alot about it (in a positive way)! but what makes it so special??
Verstuurd van mijn Nexus S met Tapatalk

It's got excellent read/write speeds with the deadline scheduler

bedalus said:
It's got excellent read/write speeds with the deadline scheduler
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, thanks, gonna flash in a few moments
---===:::Greetzz, jojoost:::===---
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

wolf230 said:
Great job....
I'm loving both thalamus kernel and Oxygen Rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used his GB rom for GS2 and loved it. I hope he makes oxygen for galaxy nexus although its already ICS
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Has anyone tried this kernel on AOKP?
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2

lancec50 said:
Has anyone tried this kernel on AOKP?
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I switch back and forth from Trinity and Thalamus kernel for a few builds now.
It pairs well with AOKP.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2

lancec50 said:
Has anyone tried this kernel on AOKP?
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both - Stable & Experimental - working perfect with AOKP Build 36.

AOKP user here, and I've used _thalamus' kernels on it, and am very satisfied, especially the experimental ones with Voodoo sound.
Sent from my Nexus S

Experimental Nexus S Kernel (3.0.32_r1) released!
Please see OP for the link.
Cheers!
Sent from my Nexus S

apatal said:
Experimental Nexus S Kernel (3.0.32_r1) released!
Please see OP for the link.
Cheers!
Sent from my Nexus S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
......working flawless with AOKPCB B36

[JB,ROM] CM10 Experimental Nightly Builds [Unofficial]

Hello
I am going to be building CM10 Experimental for the GT-i9100 Basically Every Night!
The CM team is busy creating CM10 and therefore they cant build the ROM often.
So i will build the ROM for all you Flash-Aholics :good:
This ROM is Pure CM10 and i do NOT do anything but compile it and upload it.
The ROM will be avalible about 6pm (i live in western australia)
Also this is my first actual Thingy so dont get mad at me plz
Sadly the CM Team Hasnt Put GT-i9100 into There CM10 Device Tree
Note if you would like a live update (a tweet) from me when the ROM is ready just tweet this to me "CM10" @androidjos .
ROM LINK:
Yesterday's LINK:
Gapp's:

Thx! Looking forward to ur works!
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app

I don't mean to s.h.i.t. on your parade brother but what does compiling something that someone else made have anything to do with original android development? I mean, I admit you're doing a great service for people who are unable to compile CM10 themselves but all you have to do is wait a day or two for TeamHacksung to make a few changes then repo sync and then compile. This should be in general discussion at the very least.

allyourbase said:
I don't mean to s.h.i.t. on your parade brother but what does compiling something that someone else made have anything to do with original android development? I mean, I admit you're doing a great service for people who are unable to compile CM10 themselves but all you have to do is wait a day or two for TeamHacksung to make a few changes then repo sync and then compile. This should be in general discussion at the very least.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 mate let them work and release their work when its ready pier stop for that and close his thread....
sent from my lovely phone....hmmm wait its a tablet...waaa i dont really know.....im PARANOID NoW!

allyourbase said:
I don't mean to s.h.i.t. on your parade brother but what does compiling something that someone else made have anything to do with original android development? I mean, I admit you're doing a great service for people who are unable to compile CM10 themselves but all you have to do is wait a day or two for TeamHacksung to make a few changes then repo sync and then compile. This should be in general discussion at the very least.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im a Noob :silly: And wasnt sure where to put this:silly: I wouldn't mind if this was moved BUT can somone tell me how to find this thread? luckily i made a link in my documents. how does one find a thread they started?

jezus101 said:
Im a Noob :silly: And wasnt sure where to put this:silly: I wouldn't mind if this was moved BUT can somone tell me how to find this thread? luckily i made a link in my documents. how does one find a thread they started?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
and thanks for your effort i think admin will move you automatic

When I saw your username near the title thread I was like wtf is it really you?
Jezus you are truly amazing and one of a kind I will test it for you
IN CODEWORKX WE TRUST.

bartoloandre98 said:
When I saw your name near the title thread I was like wtf?
Jezus you are truly amazing and one of a kind I will test it for you
IN CODEWORKX WE TRUST.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im a noob who wants to try this :silly: And my name actually is Jos i know its odd but thats it. or where u talking bout my username? PS: im a Noob U might have me confused with another user its jezus101

You should add "unofficial" to the thread title. It's currently a bit misleading if you ask me.
Plus, you should ask a mod to move this to the "Android development" section.

This morning I tried Cyanogenmod10 (v4.1.1) in my sgs2 and given me some poor results:
Total 4150 vs. 5880 AnTuTu of I9100XXLQB
and 2420 vs. 3750 Quafrant of I9100XXLQB.
So far I have not seen any problems other than that I see very slow the JB and drains much battery.
I wait for a more successful version.

Out of curiosity, do you think you could do builds with the Linaro toolchain? Would be different from the other builds.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app

lmmerono said:
This morning I tried Cyanogenmod10 (v4.1.1) in my sgs2 and given me some poor results:
Total 4150 vs. 5880 AnTuTu of I9100XXLQB
and 2420 vs. 3750 Quafrant of I9100XXLQB.
So far I have not seen any problems other than that I see very slow the JB and drains much battery.
I wait for a more successful version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its a "preview" with a bad GPU HW acceleration.
Also benchmarks doesn't matter!

ok
Ok thnx....​
jezus101 said:
Hello
I am going to be building CM10 Experimental for the GT-i9100 Basically Every Night!
The CM team is busy creating CM10 and therefore they cant build the ROM often.
So i will build the ROM for all you Flash-Aholics :good:
This ROM is Pure CM10 and i do NOT do anything but compile it and upload it.
The ROM will be avalible about 6pm (i live in western australia)
Also this is my first actual Thingy so dont get mad at me plz
Sadly the CM Team Hasnt Put GT-i9100 into There CM10 Device Tree
Note if you would like a live update (a tweet) from me when the ROM is ready just tweet this to me "CM10" @androidjos .
ROM LINK:
Yesterday's LINK:
Gapp's:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Logi_Ca1 said:
Out of curiosity, do you think you could do builds with the Linaro toolchain? Would be different from the other builds.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1

I won't really test these, first because he is really like a noob (no offence in any kind) as I remembered so much spamming question in Jelly Bean threads before CM10 released, second because I have own box to compile CM10 with latest changes (or prefer to use more experienced devs builds like PieR's or D4rkn3SyS's), third this isn't any helpful for CM10 developers and not any more for users, you won't probably know how to fix any problem.
I'm not saying I'm better either, but some porting teached me something and I don't want to publish my work, just to don't read under it what's not working/is bugged 100x and people flaming & asking the same with new nightly & flaming again. Yeah, but for people who can't compile ourself, this is good just in cas they want up to date CM features.

good luck mate
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

Thread closed
Once you have things really developed, go ahead and open a proper thread, but for now this is closed.