Related
Is there an official release on a Samsung ICS update or are we dependent on outside sources for ICS on the tablet. This tablet is near unusable with Gingerbread and an extremely frustrating experience.
jaewon223 said:
Is there an official release on a Samsung ICS update or are we dependent on outside sources for ICS on the tablet. This tablet is near unusable with Gingerbread and an extremely frustrating experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honeycomb not gingerbread
Sent from my SCH-I905 using xda premium
Enough this kind of threads , every day allot of threads starts to ask same question ,
please use search function or just read the first page of the thread, you will find allot of threads about ICS
Although this thread is unneeded, it does baffle me that there has been no word on an official release.
hoss_n2 said:
Enough this kind of threads , every day allot of threads starts to ask same question ,
please use search function or just read the first page of the thread, you will find allot of threads about ICS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
trust me this is not the worst...people are really getting annoyed and there isn't ics yet
Towle said:
Although this thread is unneeded, it does baffle me that there has been no word on an official release.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ikr...where are the leaks?
jaewon223 said:
Is there an official release on a Samsung ICS update or are we dependent on outside sources for ICS on the tablet. This tablet is near unusable with Gingerbread and an extremely frustrating experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The difference between HC (which is what you meant) and ICS isn't as earth shattering as people expect it to be. ICS for phones and tablets was built on the 3.0 source. HC has had h/w acceleration (which is the biggest benefit to 2.X users) since it was launched. The UI's been cleaned up and there's some additional features but that's about it. The Prime was launched with HC and upgraded to ICS and most of the discussion was on what was hosed not any dramatic improvements. Now for people moving from 2.3 to 4.0 (ICS) than yes, there's are big and noticeable improvements.
3.2 is certainly usable for me and I don't find it particularly frustrating. The Teg2 chip has limitations and Android itself can be frustrating but ICS isn't going to change that.
ICS makes your whole experience on this tablet a lot better. Maybe because the Prime is quad-core and differences may not be noticeable?
ICS on the tab makes a world of difference. So much so that im willing to forfeit the cameras.
I messaged them yesterday outta boredom and the answer was as expected ...
Ronny Cain > Samsung Canada - What's going on with the status for ice cream sandwitch for tablets and other devices ?
Samsung Canada - Ronny, we don't currently have a hard date we can share with you for the Ice Cream Sandwich update, but we know it's not too far off. Thanks for your patience.
bertiespeed said:
I messaged them yesterday outta boredom and the answer was as expected ...
Ronny Cain > Samsung Canada - What's going on with the status for ice cream sandwitch for tablets and other devices ?
Samsung Canada - Ronny, we don't currently have a hard date we can share with you for the Ice Cream Sandwich update, but we know it's not too far off. Thanks for your patience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should have said this is the year the Earth ends, so you would at least like to see what it was like before that happened
jaewon223 said:
Is there an official release on a Samsung ICS update or are we dependent on outside sources for ICS on the tablet. This tablet is near unusable with Gingerbread and an extremely frustrating experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, with Gingerbread this tablet is near unusable . try HC for a change...
hoss_n2 said:
Enough this kind of threads , every day allot of threads starts to ask same question
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. A dead forum is much better!
this forum never dies though ._.
Jay Rock said:
ICS makes your whole experience on this tablet a lot better. Maybe because the Prime is quad-core and differences may not be noticeable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have an HP touchpad running CM9 ICS, a 16gb Gtab10.1 running CM9 ICS, and a 32gb Gtab 10.1 running the latest HC 3.2 (Overcome ROM), and honestly, I haven't noticed much difference in the "whole experience" between the ICS and HC. Maybe I'll run some more benchmarks, but I know the quadrant scores on the two were about the same. Though I guess I should try streaming HD video to the Gtab, and see if that's better on ICS.
Maybe samsung will add their own "spin" on ICS when they build it, but compared to the generic form of ICS, I'd bet that most people wouldn't be able to tell the difference between HC and ICS.
mike-y said:
I have an HP touchpad running CM9 ICS, a 16gb Gtab10.1 running CM9 ICS, and a 32gb Gtab 10.1 running the latest HC 3.2 (Overcome ROM), and honestly, I haven't noticed much difference in the "whole experience" between the ICS and HC. Maybe I'll run some more benchmarks, but I know the quadrant scores on the two were about the same. Though I guess I should try streaming HD video to the Gtab, and see if that's better on ICS.
Maybe samsung will add their own "spin" on ICS when they build it, but compared to the generic form of ICS, I'd bet that most people wouldn't be able to tell the difference between HC and ICS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah you shouldn't rely on quadrant scores man.
mike-y said:
I haven't noticed much difference in the "whole experience" between the ICS and HC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dianne Hackborn is a Google engineer and periodically writes about various features/issues with the OS. Here's an excerpt from one of her blogs...
"Full" hardware accelerated drawing within a window was added in Android 3.0. The implementation in Android 4.0 is not any more full than in 3.0. Starting with 3.0, if you set the flag in your app saying that hardware accelerated drawing is allowed, then all drawing to the application’s windows will be done with the GPU. The main change in this regard in Android 4.0 is that now apps that are explicitly targeting 4.0 or higher will have acceleration enabled by default rather than having to put android:handwareAccelerated="true" in their manifest. (And the reason this isn’t just turned on for all existing applications is that some types of drawing operations can’t be supported well in hardware and it also impacts the behavior when an application asks to have a part of its UI updated. Forcing hardware accelerated drawing upon existing apps will break a significant number of them, from subtly to significantly.)
https://plus.google.com/10505198573...8x93s#105051985738280261832/posts/2FXDCz8x93s
Other than tweaks, enhancements, and some new features there's little difference between ICS and 3.X. Reports of ICS greatly improving performance are exaggerated. Phones are different because 2.X didn't fully support h/w acceleration so their gains are far more significant.
Jay Rock said:
Yeah you shouldn't rely on quadrant scores man.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
while quadrant may not be perfect, it's a tool one can use to gauge relative performance out of a device. The reason I ran the quadrant test in the first place, was because I didn't perceive a noticeable performance increase on ICS on the GTab (and quadrant seems to back this up).
So these people claiming that the user experience is so much better on ICS are either coming from gingerbread, or (probably) have a bad installation of Honeycomb (or maybe they have a lot of bloatware?).
as Barry H explained, the two OS's aren't as different as people think. That said, I do like ICS a little bit better, as there are a few (minor) differences in the UI.
mike-y said:
while quadrant may not be perfect, it's a tool one can use to gauge relative performance out of a device. The reason I ran the quadrant test in the first place, was because I didn't perceive a noticeable performance increase on ICS on the GTab (and quadrant seems to back this up).
So these people claiming that the user experience is so much better on ICS are either coming from gingerbread, or (probably) have a bad installation of Honeycomb (or maybe they have a lot of bloatware?).
as Barry H explained, the two OS's aren't as different as people think. That said, I do like ICS a little bit better, as there are a few (minor) differences in the UI.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
BarryH just reads a lot. Dianne Hackborn "explains." Comparing stock HC with a lean AOSP ICS ROM isn't really fair; of course there will be peformance differences. Comparing a tweaked 3.2 ROM with ICS would be a better example.
Is it just me or after a few hours of use does TAJB's Jellybean rom become incredible slow and sluggish? I know its still in early development but its only an incremental update from ICS which seems to be stable (for the most part) but sometimes its just goes crazy on JellyBean despite the Project Butter enahncement. Im starting to think that these new versions of Android are startin to push the boundaries for our tired old Galaxy S1's :S
The hardware of the SGS1 is old and outdated its just something we have to come to terms with. After using other phones with official ICS I understand why the SGS hasn't been supported, so I'm guessing its much the same with JB..
I am using the cm10 unofficial its smooth as hell
driodmaster92 said:
I am using the cm10 unofficial its smooth as hell
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah ive been using that too, its only slightly more responsive but still get the same problems. especially if i try to use google voice, the thing just goes berzerk.
I'm yet on unofficial CM10 v2 and it's very smooth, I fell diffrence than ics.
driodmaster92 said:
I am using the cm10 unofficial its smooth as hell
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 :good:
It's the launcher, most likely. I ran into that problem as well.
I'm on iall5tar's GNex ROM 4.1.1 Port and it's smoother than ICS, which was already fairly impressive.
Our i9000's are old, but each software upgrade is just that—an upgrade. JB is better than ICS, and ICS was better than GB. We didn't get the official update because Samsung thought their Touchwiz skinned ICS wouldn't run on our hardware. In reality, it was likely because they didn't want to spend money updating a device they no longer sold. Not because our phones couldn't actually run it.
My phone has no been faster than it is now, with JB. Blame the ROM, not the OS or the hardware.
After coming from slim ics 4.2 I also noticed slowdowns almost everywhere such as app opening, entering settings etc. On the other hand I felt the same with early and not so early ics roms like icssgs, and always went to gb roms after day or two because of slowdowns, lack of toggles etc.
Then I tried slim ics 3.x and never looked back. Same will probably happen with jb, first builds are ummature but when devs look deeper into sources and find differences and optimization for sgs, the phone will be beast
I just hope there will be other option for handling the limited space in internal flash memory than removing datadata altogether, as jb seems to improve touch and animation smoothness there is little Google can do to improve I/O performance.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk 2
JB is not the end!
Hey Guys
I am using JB at the Moment, too (TAJB v6). I tested every JB ROM for our SGS from start, and in my opinion, the GNex ports were the fastest and also very stable, but unfortunately, the people want to move forward to CM10! Anyway, JB is definetly not too much for the SGS! Everything feels fast and smooth, exept of the randomly occuring super-launcher-lags. If this happens, just kill the Launcher Task or reboot. I think JB is not the last update for our SGS!
The clue in most cases lies in the term Alpha! You flash Alpha roms you are in effect becoming a tester, so don't grumble....work towards finding solutions and posting relevant feedback and bug reports
slaphead20 said:
The clue in most cases lies in the term Alpha! You flash Alpha roms you are in effect becoming a tester, so don't grumble....work towards finding solutions and posting relevant feedback and bug reports
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this slowness is because v6 is based on pawitp's CM10 build which has datadata deleted and used instead of it slower data/data.
try derteufel's JellyBean v2 - it works like a charm!
[jRO03C] OFICIAL ANDROID 4.1.1 (JELLY BEAN) GNEX STOCK ROM (16/07/12)
I'm on [jRO03C] OFICIAL ANDROID 4.1.1 (JELLY BEAN) GNEX STOCK ROM (16/07/12) since yesterday and it is still smooth as babyskin. No slowing down trouble.
Only issue is my BLN does not work anymore, probably because of one little setting
Fixed the BLN issue,I had to RTFM Enable pulsating notification light.
Found one other issue, volume during phone call is loud and cannot be changed.
dkjr said:
I'm on [jRO03C] OFICIAL ANDROID 4.1.1 (JELLY BEAN) GNEX STOCK ROM (16/07/12) since yesterday and it is still smooth as babyskin. No slowing down trouble.
Only issue is my BLN does not work anymore, probably because of one little setting
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For those with lots of lag I recommend flashing again. I was on CM10 Alpha and it was super slow. Couldn't believe people were saying it was fast. Flashed Slim Beans which was also slow. Figured either people are crazy or it's me. Even read something about older phones having slower memory than newer ones etc.
Flashed Slim Beans a second time and this time there is no comparison. Now it is much faster. In fact it is almost like having a different phone.
I'm on [ROM GNEXUS PORT] jro03c 4.1.1 beta 4 [oficial jelly bean stock rom] and at first it's sluggish as hell...after a while it does begin to work a little bit smoother....but then again, it's nothing compared to other ICS 4.0.3-4.0.4 custom roms out there....it still needs a lot of work.
It has nothing to do with datadata and everything to do with the fact that project butter hasn't even been implemented yet. For example I use slim and it is super fast, it has no datadata.
Also we need a driver update and until we get that no butter for us.
Plus its an alpha build. Give it a break.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
vSync is not working yet. Also all JB releases are currently signed "Alpha" or "Beta", so what do you expect? They are not (yet) made for being used as a daily driver. Thanks to the devs, the development will continue
BTW: I also tried all current JB ROMs but they are still too unstable for me. It's nice to see that the i9000 can run them but actually they are not that stable yet.
yea it`s slow
i`m using JR003C it seems so slow and the network signal is down sometimes..:confused
There is a fix for the slow V6 on teamjellybean.noez.in but this is down for now... Wait for V7 and it will be smooth i think.
troyan1988 said:
this slowness is because v6 is based on pawitp's CM10 build which has datadata deleted and used instead of it slower data/data.
try derteufel's JellyBean v2 - it works like a charm!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no its not i've tested the one with datadata and the one without there is no difference
I have been loading most of the patchwork JB Roms that have been popping up here. I like some things about it, like Google Now, but I cant seem to understand "project butter." I cannot tell any real difference in smooth-ness. It still seems pretty laggy on my NS4G. I am hoping this is because either I have been using a newer device as my daily driver, or just that these Roms are hacked from other releases.
Does anyone else feel this way? What are your experiences with devices like the nexus 7 that were designed with JellyBean? smoother? same?
Nope I can see the difference its faster & smoother than ICS open app draw opens fast in ICS it took a little longer jellybean is the best OS update from Google so far 2 big thumbs up & I'm getting the same or a little better battery life than I was on ICS
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
I can definitely see a huge difference it terms of smoothness. You should probably delete some apps you don't need or do a factory wipe.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2
I mirror your experience, however am still hopeful that when Sprint releases the actual files, things will be better. I haven't experienced JB on any of the newer devices, but the reports are good. Life is all about expectations ... guess we should be thankful that we're even receiving the updates.
Killasmoke said:
Nope I can see the difference its faster & smoother than ICS open app draw opens fast in ICS it took a little longer jellybean is the best OS update from Google so far 2 big thumbs up & I'm getting the same or a little better battery life than I was on ICS
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FYI---it is VERY hard to understand you without any punctuation.
You still should keep in mind that we're on a 2 year old device... yeah yeah the original Nexus S came out in Dec 2010... not quite 2 years, but it's based off of tech that debuted in the original Galaxy S in the summer of that year. It's great hardware, but it's expected that we'll have a tough time dealing with newer OS' ... quite frankly I've considered going back to a stripped down CM7 just because of the smoothness compared to ICS (and JB) ... we're just running into serious RAM limitations on this device.
Piaband said:
I have been loading most of the patchwork JB Roms that have been popping up here. I like some things about it, like Google Now, but I cant seem to understand "project butter." I cannot tell any real difference in smooth-ness. It still seems pretty laggy on my NS4G. I am hoping this is because either I have been using a newer device as my daily driver, or just that these Roms are hacked from other releases.
Does anyone else feel this way? What are your experiences with devices like the nexus 7 that were designed with JellyBean? smoother? same?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try different kernels as well with the rom.
I definitely see a difference,
I have no more lag at all with what i used to before.
I think, the UI can be a bit smoother, but multitasking and opening/closing apps works smoooooth!
Much faster and smoother than ICS.
Running Jelly Belly 1.5.1
Don't expect 2 much from old device like nexus s.
Google is getting sued for project butter being "too smooth" by apple because apple claimed smoothness was patented.
Kidding,
But, I could see it happening.
JB is 3 steps ahead of any other OS :x
I am on jelly bean. I want to ask too why browsing in chrome is laggy? Opening apps and switching between apps is smooth though, but I dont feel that only switching and opening apps constitute the project butter.
I just don't like the fact that it keeps the phone awake over night. You ask me jellybean trying to do too much in the background. Last night I turned off 3g. When I woke up someone sent me a mms at 12am. When I check the battery stats it kept my phone awake trying to download a mms without data on. Not to smart
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda app-developers app
lekhwani said:
I am on jelly bean. I want to ask too why browsing in chrome is laggy? Opening apps and switching between apps is smooth though, but I dont feel that only switching and opening apps constitute the project butter.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dialer slow, opening Apps in Settings freaking slow, chrome slow...
JB gave new life to my NS, definitely the smoothest it has ever been, and I don't feel the need to OC. As I do with all phones/roms, all transitions and animations are turned off, including the third one added with JB. Also using Nova launcher, but am going to try Apex again now that they updated it with JB base.
And the biggest thing I noticed is how quickly the recents come up now, it's instant. I honestly didn't think that would be possible on the NS.
Piaband said:
I have been loading most of the patchwork JB Roms that have been popping up here. I like some things about it, like Google Now, but I cant seem to understand "project butter." I cannot tell any real difference in smooth-ness. It still seems pretty laggy on my NS4G. I am hoping this is because either I have been using a newer device as my daily driver, or just that these Roms are hacked from other releases.
Does anyone else feel this way? What are your experiences with devices like the nexus 7 that were designed with JellyBean? smoother? same?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pick up the Galaxy Nexus and you'll see the difference much clearer. NS is just plain old.
Why don't you try setting animations to 0.5?
Nexus S (GMS i9020a)
Paranoid (1.6 - 4.0.4)
Matrix Kernel (CFS - 20.0)
Ondemmand (800/100)
Deep Idle (On - Deadline)
Live OC - 100 (400/800)
BLX - 98 (Inverted Apps)
People don't like change, I remember seeing threads bashing ICS when it came out. Its new and the devs here have done made great progress in the short time since its release.
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app
smoka206 said:
People don't like change, I remember seeing threads bashing ICS when it came out. Its new and the devs here have done made great progress in the short time since its release.
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not bashing at all, love jelly bean.
Just mentioned where is slow.
Piaband said:
FYI---it is VERY hard to understand you without any punctuation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't know I was in school & you where an English teacher. I think you need an eye exam if you can't see or feel that jellybean is faster than ICS.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
lekhwani said:
I am on jelly bean. I want to ask too why browsing in chrome is laggy? Opening apps and switching between apps is smooth though, but I dont feel that only switching and opening apps constitute the project butter.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Chrome is a ram hog. Add in all the other processes eating ram, and you'll see why it's laggy.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2
[INTRO]
Like i told a lot of time i will record slow-motion video about jelly bean animations on galaxy s3. A lot of people on forum debate with me about "smooth" animation on cm10 (which is also my favorite rom) and i want to show how that look really compared to samsung jelly bean leaks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
[What i really did?]
As i say, i compare two builds side by side. On left side in video is last (on date: 22.09.2012.) build from samsung xxdli8 against on right side cyanogenmod 10 i9300 build from 20.09.2012. (with hw composer from "stollen" i9305 source)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
[Technical details about video]
Video is recoreded with high speed camera, 100 frames per second, resolution 640x480. In video you can see that display updates produce some "flickering" effects. That's because Super AMOLED use 60fps refresh rate and video is recored with much more frames per second.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
[Idea of this video]
First of all BIG THANKS to Team Hacksung and other CM developers. This video is not made to put negative things in front of CM team hard work. This is made to show problem that this amazing device have with all custom ROMs (because everything is based on CM framework)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
#VIDEO
Please watch in HD
Waiting for comments...
Sorry if my language is hard to understand but I try my best
It's normal that CM10 is not that smooth. We are waiting for the proper kernel sources after all.
PS: Your english is perfect.
Jack Barrett said:
It's normal that CM10 is not that smooth. We are waiting for the proper kernel sources after all.
PS: Your english is perfect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
An bad joke?
Not really? It's good.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Wow, disaster
That's maybe true, but I SEE HOW FAST IS GALAXY NEXUS and Galaxy S3 is much better device, but slower (right now).
Anyway, if you thinking like that "everything is already perfect, but everybody is unhappy" technology will be stopped in progress...
stefanACM said:
...technology will be stopped in progress...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the technology is already there, ur just mad that it doesnt work (actually it does work - just not perfectly) for your particular device
Lolz dude u targetted the only thing in samsung jb rom thats like really smooth vs cm...now dont get me wrong m a sammy fan..runin li8 maself but u should really try comparing opening animation inside settings app for example..sound..display..about phone..damn u dont even need a high tech camera to see how much their transition lag..apart from that nice work mate!
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Let's be clear.
ANIMATION is just ANIMATION. All animations are 2 time smoother on XXDLI8, but when you click "Sound" in settings for example, Samsung ROM loading a lot of stuffs and it takes 1-2 seconds, than phone show perfectly smooth ANIMATION. So, animation smoothness is better, but everything else is slow on Samsung Jelly Bean leaks. Like I say, I am big fun of CyanogenMod and I waiting for an build that will have smooth animations like Samsung ROM and I will never back to Samsung.
BTW.
I installed CM9 + Jelly Bean Animation MOD and everything is almost smooth like Samsung JB...
i dont see any big difference in this comparison.
bala_gamer said:
i dont see any big difference in this comparison.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
??? I see a very clear difference... there's a very obvious double stutter with the cm10 based ROM which isnt anywhere near ad bad on the Sammy based ROM.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Ah crap - and here I taught the CM10 builds already contain the JB features. Will then have to wait or even go back to stock as the animation makes a large amount up for (perceived) user experience. Makes me even doubt more why even going through the hassle of going custom ROM. A person losses just too many native features for a little bit of performance gain, and depending on usage, battery life. What a shame as I do enjoy the minimal app approach but if a premium phone's capability are cut I would have rather gotten a cheaper phone which is supported by CM10 or stay with fully functioning stock ROM.
Great post, non biased reporting and extremely informative. There is no way that the info you presented can be taken out of context, misinterpreted or downplayed. Hope it makes some positive ways
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Eh? Shouldn't the Samsung rom have more animations since touchwiz is heavier with animations? What do you think skins are? They don't add less animation on purpose or take away animations from stock, that is just retarded. It is the increased amount of frames that make skins slower than AOSP.
In slow mo tests skins should always >>>>>>>>>>>> CM10 and AOSP.
In speed tests it would be the other way around.
So in theory, Sense 4.0 would win this slo mo test easily with their ridiculous amounts of 3D animations and weather animations that make everything stutter and slow when it chugs. Just that it would look good in slo mo because it wouldn't be fast enough to notice the stutter. LOL
Cm10 isn't as smooth as the sammy. From what I saw at least!!
Sent from either Galaxy S3 intl or Nexus 7
both on stock at the moment!!
I was also disappointed with cm10, wasn't very smooth, it is better on the nexus. And also on the nexus it isn't as smooth as the stock or AOSP roms. But on the s3 it's probably because they don't I the sources yet...
Nice vid
Still going to use cm10 though and not JB leaks.
Thanks everybody for commencts,
Next video will be Samsung Leak vs CM9 with JB Mod animations, but until then I guess CM10 will be fixed soon.
I really would like to see Galaxy Nexus over Galaxy S3 (DLI8)
That's Galaxy Nexus right?
codeworkx said:
There's another one:
cm-10-20120922-2-EXPERIMENTAL-i9300-CODEWORKX.zip
http://developer.clockworkmod.com/d...0-20120922-2-EXPERIMENTAL-i9300-CODEWORKX.zip
- updated kernel sources
- mali r3p0
- latest drivers from LI8
That's basically everything we can do.
New leaks and a official source release won't make it better than it is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nice,...
can you u do it with the latest experimental
it looks like everything is fixed in it,..
Hey guys well it seem after watching all the speed tests on youtube, the iphone 5 is generally faster, but the catch is the S3 is running ICS with touch wiz. But i havent seen 1 video were they do a speed test with the S3 running stock jelly bean vs iphone 5! or maybe a touch wiz S3 vs a stock jelly S3, does someone know of one or can make one?
cyprusx said:
Hey guys well it seem after watching all the speed tests on youtube, the iphone 5 is generally faster, but the catch is the S3 is running ICS with touch wiz. But i havent seen 1 video were they do a speed test with the S3 running stock jelly bean vs iphone 5! or maybe a touch wiz S3 vs a stock jelly S3, does someone know of one or can make one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How du you want to do this when there isn't a 100% working 4.1.1 JB for international I9300 S3 in the air?
I think the polish version is not what Samsung wanted, perhaps it was a mistake that it was officially released and and they realised it too late?
I dont know, but I will wait until the real JB is released, it can only be a week or two. (i hope)
THEN I am sure the S3 is as fast as the iPhone 5 and much better overall. The google speak assistant is way better than siri. :good:
lienot
Yes I know of the official Touchwiz jelly bean will be faster but I want to see a stock Jelly bean speed comparison without touchwiz, isn't there a stable rom now like resurrection rom?
These iPhone comparison threads are not getting us anywhere. It will surely get locked.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
iPhone5 might be faster even with official JB out but that doesn't mean that it can replace android customisation, great screen size and color, and many more great features of the s3
F|_|C|< iSUCK5
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
1. Wait till final version of JB on S3
2. Set animations scales to 0.5 in developer options.
3. Now compare =)
4. This thread is getting closed soon =\
dark_polok said:
1. Wait till final version of JB on S3
2. Set animations scales to 0.5 in developer options.
3. Now compare =)
4. This thread is getting closed soon =\
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice mate.Really nice.
Could you please explain why this adjustment helps??
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
boulek said:
Nice mate.Really nice.
Could you please explain why this adjustment helps??
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because the animation that you see when you launch an application is lasting 0.5 seconds instead if 1, so you get 0.5 seconds speedup if the application is loaded in that period.
cyprusx said:
Hey guys well it seem after watching all the speed tests on youtube, the iphone 5 is generally faster, but the catch is the S3 is running ICS with touch wiz. But i havent seen 1 video were they do a speed test with the S3 running stock jelly bean vs iphone 5! or maybe a touch wiz S3 vs a stock jelly S3, does someone know of one or can make one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go try a nexus...
They support 100% jellybean and project butter..
the difference betwen the S3 and this in terms of smothness and ui responsivness are neglegible(when jellybean is 100% operational on the S3 of course,right now the nexus devices run smoother than the S3)...
These threads never end up well, that's why they get closed. Comparison threads in general get closed, much less an iPhone comparison thread.
---Jay--- Mobile Moderating from the Nexus™