It will be interesting to see what happens when the SIII gets Jelly Bean. I, for one, like the idea of S Voice. Not really as an assistant, but as a hands free option when I'm driving. "Hi Galaxy. Do this **** for me." It's perfect for that. Google Now handles what S Voice does not and can not do. So what will happen?
Will Samsung simply not implement Google Now?
Will Samsung remove S Voice?
or...
Will Samsung somehow combine them?
Picture this. Samsung, instead of using the Wolfram Alpha engine they use, using Google Now and its services. S Voice opens up and voila it is all there. Now that's not to say that we wouldn't use Google Now as a stand alone option.
My mind is just racing around with different ideas with what will happen. One thing I am curious about is how Google Now will be implemented. The Nexus has the slide up from the on screen button feature. We don't.
What are your thoughts on Google Now and how/what Samsung might do with S Voice and Google Now?
I guess Google voice with the new features will continue to exist alongside svoice as a separate app, like it is today.
The voice recognition feature was one of the main parts of apple's latest complaints against the GSIII that was dropped in order to keep the Galaxy Tab lawsuit on track.
I wonder if they will re-file that lawsuit as it was against Samsung's SVoice feature now that google has it's own version of it, or will they re-file this time against Google and Samsung together?
wondering......
jamesnmandy said:
The voice recognition feature was one of the main parts of apple's latest complaints against the GSIII that was dropped in order to keep the Galaxy Tab lawsuit on track.
I wonder if they will re-file that lawsuit as it was against Samsung's SVoice feature now that google has it's own version of it, or will they re-file this time against Google and Samsung together?
wondering......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Svoice has a loophole....its BS....its just Vlingo with a skin on it. And Google has been running voice command and interaction long before Apple....not to mention apple bought Siri.....this will be a tough fight for Apple to actually win.
Sent from........Somewhere In Time
Considering S- Voice uses the same stuff as Siri, my bet is Apple sue's over it, they dump vlingo/wolfram alpha and switch to Google with Touchwiz skin.
Sent from my DROIDX
Sniper_5 said:
Considering S- Voice uses the same stuff as Siri, my bet is Apple sue's over it, they dump vlingo/wolfram alpha and switch to Google with Touchwiz skin.
Sent from my DROIDX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, thats what i am thinking too, but i wonder if Google will pressure Samsung to go ahead into court so that Google can see how their own patent will hold up as if they were the ones going to court. Would give them an advantage to know ahead of time in the event Apple tried to take Google to court over voice.
Sent from my DROIDX using xda premium
Sniper_5 said:
Considering S- Voice uses the same stuff as Siri, my bet is Apple sue's over it, they dump vlingo/wolfram alpha and switch to Google with Touchwiz skin.
Sent from my DROIDX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the thing apple sue Samsung over using vlingo and Wolfram alpha. Did they have an exclusive deal because it looks like they had a partnership in the development s voice
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
Thing I don't like about s voice is you can't call someone not in your contacts. Google voice search is better because I can say call some random business and it usually does .
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
Related
New Software Update for Nexus One phones
Starting today, Nexus One users will begin to receive an over-the-air software update on their phones. This update provides some great new features, and fixes a few problems that some users might have experienced, including:
Google Goggles: this mobile application will now be available directly on your device by launching it from your All Apps menu. Just use your Nexus One camera to start searching the web
Google Maps: the Maps application with be updated to a new version, Google Maps 3.4, which will include:
* Starred items synchronized with maps.google.com - access your favorite places from your phone or computer
* Search suggestions from your personal maps.google.com history - makes it easy to search for places you've searched for before
* Night mode in Google Maps Navigation - automatically changes your screen at night for easier viewing and driving
Pinch-to-zoom functionality: devices will now include a new pinch-to-zoom mechanism in the phone's Browser, Gallery and Maps applications
3G connectivity: we will provide a general fix to help improve 3G connectivity on some Nexus One phones
In order to access the update, you will receive a message on your phone's notification bar. Just download the update, wait for it to install, and you should be all set. This update will be rolled out gradually to phones - and most users might not receive the notification until the end of the week. We hope you enjoy these new features and look forward to your feedback.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://googlenexusoneboard.blogspot.com/2010/02/new-software-update-for-nexus-one.html
Google is including pinch-to-zoom? Maybe it's the cynic in me, but I'm not buying this blogpost right now...
Edit: I just saw that's an official Google blog... wonder what made Google backpedal on their "one-handed operation" focus...
uansari1 said:
Google is including pinch-to-zoom? Maybe it's the cynic in me, but I'm not buying this blogpost right now...
Edit: I just saw that's an official Google blog... wonder what made Google backpedal on their "one-handed operation" focus...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe it was Steve Jobs comments about Google "dont be evil" being bull***t that made them include it in the update.
uansari1 said:
Google is including pinch-to-zoom? Maybe it's the cynic in me, but I'm not buying this blogpost right now...
Edit: I just saw that's an official Google blog... wonder what made Google backpedal on their "one-handed operation" focus...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think Andy knew damn well it was coming and thats why is only answer was...
"we ll look into it"
also he may be right about steve jobs smack talking Google and pissing them BIG G off haha
frenchtom said:
i think Andy knew damn well it was coming and thats why is only answer was...
"we ll look into it"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well if he didn't knew it was coming than who would?
It's just a major surprise now and I like surprises, I'm happy for the Americans
efeltee said:
Well if he didn't knew it was coming than who would?
It's just a major surprise now and I like surprises, I'm happy for the Americans
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm happy for the Ameri...er, us too! Don't get me a wrong.. I'm a fan of one-handed operation, but we should have had the option from the get go. Plus this nullifies one of the iPhone fanboy's claims. They still have a better device built into their phone... but whatever. I don't listen to much music anyway.
uansari1 said:
Plus this nullifies one of the iphone fanboy's claims.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HELL YES. No more apple fanboys whining about multitouch MUWHAHAHAHHAHA
I know the roll out is gradual, but is it essentially randomly? Or some ultra google algorithm?
Paul22000 said:
HELL YES. No more apple fanboys whining about multitouch MUWHAHAHAHHAHA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh don't worry... they'll find something. The built-in media player being a case in point.
one has to wonder just how much apple asked for monetarily in order for google to update the phone with multitouch support stateside.
glad to see it arriving so quickly after the initial release of the phone.
the only thing I miss from my iphone is the application support. Pandora, Facebook, etc...they are years beyond on the iphone compared to android devices. I know they are catching up but that really is a pain point considering how fantastic a device this is.
Imagine what will come of iphone users when flash finally hits android devices world wide?
the rumor that i always felt had the largest grain of truth was that apple asked google to not do it because it could invalidate apples shady patents and since a google ceo was on the board of director for apple a one point in time it was kind of an ok well just for a little while also why not make google the default iphone search provider
so now my theory is that when apple started to proposition microsoft to use bing as iphone default search this obviously pissed off google and now multi-touch
maybe i listen to too much TWiT though
I thought this was an interesting article, albeit short. I wish they went deeper into the story. http://www.bgr.com/2011/01/31/is-this-why-apple-and-google-hate-each-other/
I was wondering, without Google, Apple's iPhone would be missing some key features, like Gmail and Google Maps. What keeps Google tied to Apple? Now that Android has taken off, what would happen if Google pulled the relationship with Apple and stopped supporting the iPhone? Meaning, if you want Gmail, you have to use an Android phone. Would there be incredible backlash against Google, or would Gmail-users ditch their iPhone? Can Google survive on its own?
I think this would be an interesting discussion.
onthecouchagain said:
I thought this was an interesting article, albeit short. I wish they went deeper into the story. http://www.bgr.com/2011/01/31/is-this-why-apple-and-google-hate-each-other/
I was wondering, without Google, Apple's iPhone would be missing some key features, like Gmail and Google Maps. What keeps Google tied to Apple? Now that Android has taken off, what would happen if Google pulled the relationship with Apple and stopped supporting the iPhone? Meaning, if you want Gmail, you have to use an Android phone. Would there be incredible backlash against Google, or would Gmail-users ditch their iPhone? Can Google survive on its own?
I think this would be an interesting discussion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the issue is that Google wants to make itself the open-source alternative. This has its benefits; it means wider acceptance and ease of developing for its platform but it also means that it cannot simply close off certain apps and prevent them from being utilized on other platforms. Sure, El Goog could stop officially supporting their products on Apple platforms but that would lead to more backlash than benefit. I, myself, love Google. I use Google products (Chrome, Android, Gmail, Google Calendar, Google Maps, Google Navigation, Google Docs, etc.) for pretty much everything. However, I also own two Macbooks because Windows based computers just haven't gotten to the point where I would want to use one again. If Google stopped supporting all Apple platforms, I would have to make the choice between free alternatives to things I can do access otherwise or the two computers I spent a combined three grand on.
In fact, I can honestly say that in spite of my love for Android, if today they announced that Apple products and platforms would no longer receive Google Support, I would go to BB and return both mine and my wife's Nexus S, switch us to Verizon and get iPhones (when they come out).
Essentially, to sum up, my belief is that given the way Google has positioned themselves in the market they cannot simply cast aside a large portion of users in that way, it would be corporate suicide.
Don't think either could alienate each other to that extent.
Besides, there's always Google Mobile - were Gmail to be removed from Apple's Mail app for some reason, it's still accessible via mail.google.com in Safari. But realistically how would (prospective) Apple customers react to that?
Google is better.
i just dont think google would want to lose those valuable iphone customers using their gmail service. even though it competes, having those eyes looking at ads is better than not having those eyes looking at ads.
Androyed said:
Google is better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What a wonderful, intelligent addition to what was supposed to be an interesting, thought-provoking discussion.
Good answers, guys. Now that I think about it, it was a pretty silly question. It'd be unwise for Google to cut ties. What an interesting relationship they have with Apple, though. They need each other, but are apparently such fierce rivals.
Don't forget. Google is a search company.
you can also take a look at it this way. Google gets a paycheque from Apple for using their services just like microsoft gets one from google and other way around.
There are so many patents and crossed cheques between the companies that it would not make sense to stop doing it now. Next thing you know Microsoft wont let google use their patened mail exchange server and 1/2 the Android users that dont use Gmail all of a sudden hate android. Some **** like that.
They'll keep doing it as long as there is a costumer and someone is makeing money.
I would like to see them apart. I would never throw my money away by buying an apple product.
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
Paulska said:
you can also take a look at it this way. Google gets a paycheque from Apple for using their services just like microsoft gets one from google and other way around.
There are so many patents and crossed cheques between the companies that it would not make sense to stop doing it now. Next thing you know Microsoft wont let google use their patened mail exchange server and 1/2 the Android users that dont use Gmail all of a sudden hate android. Some **** like that.
They'll keep doing it as long as there is a costumer and someone is makeing money.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Completely off topic, but yay for POLAND!!!
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
Zardos66 said:
I would like to see them apart. I would never throw my money away by buying an apple product.
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a rather closed-minded outlook. Have you ever *owned* an apple product? I've never had anything but amazing experiences with their support and I've only ever had to use their support three times in the 5 years I've owned macbooks. Also, recently they replaced the entire keyboard and bezel on my 5 year old macbook simply because it had a cosmetic defect. I brought it in and told them that the keyboard stopped working because I spilled drinks on it and used it heavily for five years and because of the cosmetic defect they replaced it. Free. While I waited. Meanwhile, my wife's Compaq laptop had two major recalls in two years both due to massive motherboard failure and because I was a week late calling about the second I missed the window and they wanted to charge $400 to fix it. Throwing money away on Apply products? More like investing in a product that will be supported long after it is technologically obsolete.
EDIT: I understand I'm going to get called a iFanboy for that but its the truth. They have never done any wrong by me. When it comes to phones, I much prefer Android but I will continue buying Apple computers until they do wrong by me. I'm on my second MacBook (this one Pro) and I only upgraded because I wanted a better screen and the old one was, well, old. Name one other manufacturer that would offer free technical servicing to a machine far out of warranty.
Zardos66 said:
I would like to see them apart. I would never throw my money away by buying an apple product.
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Open your mind.
it's a symbiotic relationship...
Might I also suggest a topic title change to Apples To Googles.
kenvan19 said:
What a wonderful, intelligent addition to what was supposed to be an interesting, thought-provoking discussion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am sorry, it was just that, well, Apple vs Google is discussed a lot on the internet. When I read the actual text, I got to admit the question isn't that silly.
Just change the threadtitle.
Somewhat related;
techcrunch.com/2011/01/31/apple-reportedly-blocks-sony-reader-app-could-spell-war-with-kindle/
As noted, you can't purchase within the Kindle app, but this is the power that Apple has over what goes on their phones. The fine line Google must also tread
different business models
I think the reason that they are still so tied together is that they use different business models.
Apple sells hardware; computers, iPhones, or iPads, Apple's goal is to sell hardware.
Google sells advertising, they make their money off of people using their services. The majority of Google's income still comes from selling advertising.
Apple uses Google's services because they are popular and they are the best available. Gmail is the number 2 email service, and maps is superior to any of the other search/ map products available to Apple. What is Apple going to replace Google Maps with if they removed it from iOS, Bing Maps? I just don't see that happening since Google Maps is a superior product (although Microsoft has been improving Bing recently).
Google realizes that the future of computing is increasingly mobile, and they do not want the control of access to that controlled solely by any one company. This is where Android comes into Google's business model. Google's main interest in Android is the same as their other services, Google wants people using the web so they can sell advertising.
Apple is clearly pissed that Android is cutting into Apple's sales of the iPhone and iPad. Google basically doesn't care how you access their services, so long as you are using them.
The two companies have different goals, because of this it is more likely that Apple would replace Google's services on iOS that Google would pull them. I think the closest that Google would get is what we have now with some features restricted for Android such as turn by turn navigation and the Gmail app on Android.
If this even Nexus S related? Why is this in the Nexus S section?
I like my iMac, enjoy my Windows XP netbook, iPod Touch, Android Droid Pro and Android Nexus S.. just sayin' lol.
http://www.phonescoop.com/news/item.php?n=8063
Bing is now becoming their default search & map.
Not to knock Bing too badly. If you can put aside any feelings toward Microsoft and some unscrupulous history (data mining Google for instance), it has a nice design, beautiful backgrounds, and an excellent iPad app.
However, when I bought this phone, the reviewers asserted that all I needed to do to replace it with Google was download an app. Ha! I don't care what the quality of the product is, forcing it down my throat left a permanent blemish.
My two cents is that RIM is foolish for jumping into bed with Microsoft and I really do worry about their future.
- Evil Peanut Butter Jelly Froyo
I don't really care for Bing, but at the same time I hardly use Google search or maps. Personally, I'll be taking a good long look at getting a Blackberry when they move to QNX for phones and have a 10" Playbook.
I like my Fascinate but I definitely miss the rock solid push services my numerous BB's had. (At least when the NOC wasn't down lol)
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
I just think the whole Bing thing for us is weird. RIM can do what they want but with Verizon doing it with google phones... it's just weird. Like traitorous or something.
Sent from my MIUI SCH-i500
Android App Speaktoit Assistant Blows Away Siri...and available for 97.5% of ALL 190million Android out there (unlike the Siri junk which is only available for the iPhone4Sux - meaning 0%) [Video]
October 13, 2011, By Leo Xavier
http://www.devicemag.com/2011/10/13...nt-is-more-popular-than-iphone-4s-siri-video/
VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=myE498nyfGw&feature=player_embedded
You will most probably agree with us when we say that Apple failed to deliver anything awesome at the unveiling ceremony of its iPhone 4S. Although the device comes with a lot of hardware upgrades, it didn’t amaze people like all the past products from the company.
One of the device’s features that the company was so excited to tell everyone about was the Siri technology that “lets you use your voice to send…” well, many of you already know the rest of that announcement.
That description about Siri is just too much of an introduction for something that is already available on the market and is much more popular than Siri. We are talking about the Speaktoit Assistant Android app.
The Speaktoit app may not have a sleek name as Siri, but it has more features and downloads of the app have vaulted into the tens of thousands in the past week.
According to a spokesperson for Speaktoit, downloads have grown “400% in seven days” and the app is “adding 3,000 users a day based (so far) only on word of mouth and rave reviews on the Android Market”.
The free Android app is already doing many of the things that Siri will start offering tomorrow onwards.
Similar to Siri, Speaktoit understands conversational context. You just have to tell the app what it should do. It can send emails, send texts, look up information, post to Twitter, update your Facebook, find news, look up traffic, look up weather, and do much more.
But in addition to all those features, Speaktoit also lets you choose a cartoon avatar to converse with. Therefore it’s much more personal and fun.
Better still, the app learns as it’s used, making it more helpful with time. For example, users wanted the app to play music, and the functionality is available today.
Just in case you are wondering, the iOS and BlackBerry versions of the Speaktoit app will be available in the very near future. We will let you know when that happens. For now, check out the video and you can place your comments below.
VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=myE498nyfGw&feature=player_embedded
How can it be better than Siri when no one knows how good Siri will be? I guess true reviews can come out today since the devices go out.
Of course this is just and advertisement/press release.... and so we shouldn't beleive a word of it.
The video is impressive, but it appears to use Google Voice for recognition so recognition will only be that good. It's also very fast (like the apple commercials), which lead me to believe it's not real time and probably carefully scripted.
Robert
wasn't Siri an app in the app store before iPhone acquired it? I don't think its a new thing for the iphone 4S
bdroc said:
wasn't Siri an app in the app store before iPhone acquired it? I don't think its a new thing for the iphone 4S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apple always claim things even when they already exist for a long time.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
iynfynity said:
Apple always claim things even when they already exist for a long time.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup quite true.
Although coming back to this app, I've tried it and it didn't go very well.
Apple bought Siri well over a year ago.
I'm at work right now, but I installed STI and it's kind of fun. I'm mostly typing into it. Things like "Get me to REI", "What's the closest Subway?" "Twitter" and everything is connecting to the right answer pretty quickly. I'm looking forward to testing it out later when I can talk into it.
Edit: I've gotten quite a few error messages now: "There was an unknown error. I'm telling my creators about it right now so they can fix it as soon as possible."
so i just installed this APP on my vibrant and it sucks balls. It lags like a MOFO. I asked all sorts of questions and only about 20% of the time it got it right.
I'm not a fan of this APP as of now.
Hopefully with updates and lag fixes will improve it.
"Thumbs down" for me. But good effort
I'm not knocking this app, this is just my personal experience.
Installed over miui, ss series. FC city, dialer framework apps mms, made my phone unuseable. Once I uninstalling went back to normal
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
leechdweler said:
so i just installed this APP on my vibrant and it sucks balls. It lags like a MOFO. I asked all sorts of questions and only about 20% of the time it got it right.
I'm not a fan of this APP as of now.
Hopefully with updates and lag fixes will improve it.
"Thumbs down" for me. But good effort
I'm not knocking this app, this is just my personal experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Works fine on mine with Bionix 1.3.1.... I'd say it recognized 85% of the things I said... thumbs up....
I played with it for about an hour but it only recognized one thing. oh well.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I am an android user, I have both speaktoit and vlingo and use both quite often. I got the chance to.interact with Siri for a bit today. I will say the biggest difference between both of them and siri is the fact that siri has personality. Yes vlingo and speaktoit are quite resourceful, but you can't joke around with them! Ask siri where you can hide a body or tell it your horny! Ask it for a blowjob etc and the personality aspect of it comes into play! Im sorry to say but being able to interact with an application on that level and with the responses it.gives in my opinion make it more desirable to me! Yes android has had all the fundamentals for quite a long time, but apple took it to a whole new level with personality! I look forward to seeing what the android community and Google developers will.come up with in the personality aspect
please, lets look at facts and not be fanboys OP. I am an android user/programmer, and even I will admit, Siri is quite better than anything android really has now.
tried speak to it and my major problem with it, if it doesnt know how to reply to your query, it just says something like looking into it, and a lot of its responses are ambiguous. As far as i am concerned, speak to it is google voice given its lack of understanding for typically used phrases
Voice action app is really good. It will set your alarm and things like that by just saying " wake me up at 8 a.m." You can kinda have a conversation with it too.
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA App
nm
10 char
And android developers have begun to mimic siri, now in alpha stage and availiable from market is an App called Iris. I look forward to the beta's and final release!
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
What a brilliant ad from sammy
http://ausdroid.net/2012/09/16/samsung-ad-against-iphone-5/
please let that be a genuine advert
slaphead20 said:
please let that be a genuine advert
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i reckon haha good on sammy for sticking it to em
slaphead20 said:
please let that be a genuine advert
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even if it wasn't I have seen enough references to it already!
why it shows 2GB RAM for SGSlll in ad?
SignalX said:
why it shows 2GB RAM for SGSlll in ad?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
because they are marketing the i9305
I believe it's an American ad. All the sgs3s here have 2gbs of ram.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
imneveral0ne said:
I believe it's an American ad. All the sgs3s here have 2gbs of ram.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looking at op name I'm guessing possibly Australian, they have the humor over there!
Ausboy 2011 said:
because they are marketing the i9305
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oopS! didn't know that!! : )
will be great!!!
anyway, i like this ad :d
Yeah it's a good ad, but some of the things they've listed there make Samsung a laughing stock.
Shake to update
Tilt to zoom
Are these REALLY selling points for the device? I don't think so.
IPhone fans have already started making their own images with a list of iPhone pros and I have to say their lists are more compelling than simple gestures.
I'd rather Samsung list the actual things that make their phone the best in the world rather than gimmicky gestures.
Edit: I would really prefer it if they didn't compare S-Voice to Siri as well. S-Voice completely sucks.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
matttye said:
Yeah it's a good ad, but some of the things they've listed there make Samsung a laughing stock.
Shake to update
Tilt to zoom
Are these REALLY selling points for the device? I don't think so.
IPhone fans have already started making their own images with a list of iPhone pros and I have to say their lists are more compelling than simple gestures.
I'd rather Samsung list the actual things that make their phone the best in the world rather than gimmicky gestures.
Edit: I would really prefer it if they didn't compare S-Voice to Siri as well. S-Voice completely sucks.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your kidding right? Samsung probably shouldn't have used some of those but the isheep lists were a complete joke. Imessage? Puleeze. I turned that **** off first thing and downloaded whatsapp.
Also to answer your question in the thread that was closed. Refresh rates matter in every aspect and not just games and viewing so yes people should care.
slaphead20 said:
Looking at op name I'm guessing possibly Australian, they have the humor over there!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Says Samsung Mobile USA at the bottom.
Meh. They don't need to market it. Apple is already marketing the S3. Now, thanks to the crap iPhone 5, we're still the king of Android!!!
Well, at least until the new Nexus comes out at the end of the year.
Tomatoes8 said:
Your kidding right? Samsung probably shouldn't have used some of those but the isheep lists were a complete joke. Imessage? Puleeze. I turned that **** off first thing and downloaded whatsapp.
Also to answer your question in the thread that was closed. Refresh rates matter in every aspect and not just games and viewing so yes people should care.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I happen to find iMessage really useful. I use it to talk to my long distance fianceé a lot. I'd gladly use Whatsapp if you could use it on an iPad, but you can't.
Some other things I've seen listed that are useful; iCloud, Do Not Disturb ('Blocking Mode' in the SGS3 Jelly Bean update covers this), more available apps, shared photo stream (very useful), Airplay.
Whilst I think that MicroUSB is perfect and Apple are idiots for not using it, I don't think Samsung are in any position to criticise Apple for that:
http://forums.macrumors.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=357780&d=1347746614
I did laugh when people were trying to say that FaceTime and Panorama were selling points for the iPhone, when S3 has had both of these features since launch (FaceTime in the form of Google Talk).
matttye said:
I happen to find iMessage really usetasked userejected o talk to my g distance fianceé a lot. I'd gladly use Whatsapp if you could use it on an iPad, but you can't.
Some other thingseveryone en listed that are useful; iCloud, Do Not Disturb ('Blocking Mode' in the SGS3 Jelly Bean update covers this), more available apps, shared photo stream (very useful), Airplay.
Whilst I think that MicroUSB is perfect and Apple are idiots for not using it, I don't think Samsung are in any position to criticise Apple for that:
http://forums.macrumors.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=357780&d=1347746614
I did laugh when people were trying to say that FaceTime and Panorama were selling points for the iPhone, when S3 has had both of these features since launch (FaceTime in the form of Google Talk).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The S3 has much more DNLA options than the iPhone. Not sure of the all share cast dongle is as good as airplay but its the same technology plus the S3 has every direct WiFi connection under the sun with the buddy photo share and all share and kies air.
Icloud, well um no thanks. I had the 4s for 6 months and never used it. To be fair,I don't use drop box for my phone either. Although my Toshiba laptop uses drop box a lot.
Whatsapp is superior because not everyone has an iphone. Blackberry, windows, iphone, android compatible and you name it.
Do not disturb has been on Android phones for ages. Look up tasker and reject calls on your dialer.
Either way. Those lists that were made by isheep are more pathetic because they actually truly believe that they are good lists.lol
While the Samsung marketing guy is probably just some undergrad marketing major that knows nothing about phones and just made that list up from spec sheets on the internet.
Tomatoes8 said:
The S3 has much more DNLA options than the iPhone. Not sure of the all share cast dongle is as good as airplay but its the same technology plus the S3 has every direct WiFi connection under the sun with the buddy photo share and all share and kies air.
ITunes, well um no thanks. I had the 4s for 6 months and never used it. To be fair,I don't use drop box for my phone either. Although my Toshiba laptop uses drop box a lot.
Whatsapp is superior because not everyone has an iphone. Blackberry, windows, iphone, android compatible and you name it.
Do not disturb has been on Android phones for ages. Look up tasker and reject calls on your dialer.
Either way. Those lists were made by isheep are more pathetic because they actually truly believe that they are good lists.lol
While the Samsung marketing guy is probably just some undergrad marketing major that knows nothing about phones and just made that list up from spec sheets on the internet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AirPlay can play to speakers in every room of your house at the same time. I don't think AllShare or any other Samsung solution (or DLNA) does that, but correct me if I'm wrong. The fact that AirPlay speakers are about five times the price of other comparable speakers is a bit of a joke though.
iTunes - didn't say anything about this. You mean iCloud?
Whatsapp is superior... for phones. I have an iPad and a phone. Whatsapp won't work on my iPad. Also, doesn't Whatsapp only support logging in on one device at a time? Skype is probably a better multi-platform example as you can login to it on multiple devices at the same time (including tablets and PCs)
Reject calls doesn't have as many features as Blocking Mode. Also, reject calls is blacklist based whereas Blocking Mode is whitelist based. I.e. with Blocking Mode you can set it to auto-reject calls from everyone but your nearest and dearest. I know about Tasker, but I'm pretty sure people are comparing features included by default. Samsung are, at least.
matttye said:
AirPlay can play to speakers in every room of your house at the same time. I don't think AllShare or any other Samsung solution (or DLNA) does that, but correct me if I'm wrong. The fact that AirPlay speakers are about five times the price of other comparable speakers is a bit of a joke though.
iTunes - didn't say anything about this. You mean iCloud?
Whatsapp is superior... for phones. I have an iPad and a phone. Whatsapp won't work on my iPad. Also, doesn't Whatsapp only support logging in on one device at a time? Skype is probably a better multi-platform example as you can login to it on multiple devices at the same time (including tablets and PCs)
Reject calls doesn't have as many features as Blocking Mode. Also, reject calls is blacklist based whereas Blocking Mode is whitelist based. I.e. with Blocking Mode you can set it to auto-reject calls from everyone but your nearest and dearest. I know about Tasker, but I'm pretty sure people are comparing features included by default. Samsung are, at least.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I meant Icloud. Anyways Samsung could have used wireless charging, better multitasking, better notifications bar etc. but there is really no point because people don't really care about that stuff.
People do care about useless gimmicky features though so Samsung's list if every bit as good as those crappy ifan lists from a marketing perspective.
And the apps still count even if they are not preinstalled. Apple fans champion their ecosystem all the time which includes the app store. IOS does have a much better selection of games though.