Database Users

[Benchmark] Post your benchmarks to see who can get the best out of their device

I have an Atrix 4G and managed to get 4708 with Quadrant.

good idea, but without OS informations it is bit worthless. pls update. thx

KulDrive said:
I have an Atrix 4G and managed to get 4708 with Quadrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your post is already flawed since quadrant doesn't have good support for dual core... accuracy may be off. Try ChainFire.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium

http://forum.xda-developers.com/search.php?searchid=93702893

Not with what I did to it did multiple tests and all where around 4500-4700

No quadrant doesn't use both cores use newer bench
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

KulDrive said:
Not with what I did to it did multiple tests and all where around 4500-4700
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
unless you re-wrote the APK to support both cores, then you're gonna be better off using either Antutu or CF Bench.

Besides Quadrant not testing both cores, who wants to compare thier phone to the 2009 lineup? Time to upgrade your benchmarking app. I dont need an app to know the Atrix is better than the OGdroid. Quadrant sucks!

WiredPirate said:
Besides Quadrant not testing both cores, who wants to compare thier phone to the 2009 lineup? Time to upgrade your benchmarking app. I dont need an app to know the Atrix is better than the OGdroid. Quadrant sucks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
testing antutu one moment please
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium

i dont see how the new samsung is better though
it seems to hang when doing the sd read and write im prolly loseing a few points because of my generic sd card
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium

oh here is a test with cf bench
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium

ltdanno360 said:
oh here is a test with cf bench View attachment 741213
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here's my CF Bench (taken on CM7 Pre-beta 2; haven't had a reason to do another one since then)

Running CM7 Beta, Overclocked to 1.3Ghz.

halfgingghost said:
Running CM7 Beta, Overclocked to 1.3Ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow scores like this that beet the sgs2
make me want to flash cm7 stat! only one thing keeps me from it ; my custom webtop; )
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium

cm7 faux2.0 oc1.3

freshbakd said:
cm7 faux2.0 oc1.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1g ram free? How? I only have 893
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk

Man, just started a similar thread without knowing that this thread was created.
Kinda changed it though into a competition style; I think some people in here may want to post in my thread as well as some people are getting seriously high benchmarks!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1294749

Man...I was surprised to see the SGS2 is just as fast stock as mine is OC'd and deblurred.
Aura
Homebase in my sig...

Phoneguy589 said:
Man...I was surprised to see the SGS2 is just as fast stock as mine is OC'd and deblurred.
Aura
Homebase in my sig...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea hopfully we can get some kinda superkernal 2.5oc to blow sg2 out of the water but i think our phones might blowup first; )
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium

Usa v6 speed mod

dsexton702 said:
These are some tweaks created by dsexton702 that offer you a generous performance boost in I/O and giving you the newest fugu mod 3.1. This is a fast growing tweak and needs to be shared with everyone who can benefit from it
download the U.S.A.Sv6
OP: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1236779
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It does work on our phones as I'm using right know...just thought I pass on the good work of these devs...
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium

What is it like V6SuperCharger?
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App

It speeds up and opyimuzes androids Input and output....its just version6 of the mod.....thy have a new version but I haven't tried yet..I've used this on my HTC hd2 and mytouch 4g and know my shift .....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium

Idk if I posted in right section if not can mod move this please to right one....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium

v6 supercharger is useless IMO. Tweak your data setting in ##DATA# with a sense rom and use a good kernel like super scary stable.

VICODAN said:
v6 supercharger is useless IMO. Tweak your data setting in ##DATA# with a sense rom and use a good kernel like super scary stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You see I did tweak my ##DATA# setting and use Scarykernel on the latest CM7 nightlies. There's a noticable improvement using V6Supercharger over without on my device.
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App

Same here I have found a noticable speed also in quadrent score also....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium

bigfdaddy said:
Same here I have found a noticable speed also in quadrent score also....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's your antutu score with Scary kernel on toasty at 1900mhz?

Here the score Wich includes v6 mod,scary govener,1900mhz over clock,and SD booster...
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium

bigfdaddy said:
Here the score Wich includes v6 mod,scary govener,1900mhz over clock,and SD booster...
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Proof that this **** is useless:
Scarystable compcache disabled:
RAM 612
CPU integer 1221
CPU float-point 518
2d graphics 276
3d graphics 793
database io 535
sdcard write 9.9MB/s 99
sdcard read 17.5 MB/s 175
total score: 4229
Linpack single thread score = 62.33 MFLOPS, Time 1.35 Seconds, Norm Res 5.68, Precision 2.22044604...
Linpack multi thread score = 57.961 MFLOPS, Time 2.91 seconds Norm Res, 3.24, Precision 2.22044604...
P.S. You should use Toasty gov for benchmarking and run benchmarks on a fresh boot and close as many apps as possible.
BTW:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1296614
---------- Post added at 01:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:54 AM ----------

Benchmark scores do not prove actual real life performance...
They are just numbers ppl like to boast about and doesn't mean your phone is any faster/more responsive with a higher score.
And. Any scores wether antutu/quadrant/or whatever can be faked.
Sent from my Supreme Shift on Wires!

notsointeresting said:
Benchmark scores do not prove actual real life performance...
They are just numbers ppl like to boast about and doesn't mean your phone is any faster/more responsive with a higher score.
And. Any scores wether antutu/quadrant/or whatever can be faked.
Sent from my Supreme Shift on Wires!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't be wasting my breath and posting fake benchmark scores if I didn't believe it and try this mod.
The only difference I noticed was LPP loading a little bit faster on startup.

VICODAN said:
I wouldn't be wasting my breath and posting fake benchmark scores if I didn't believe it and try this mod.
The only difference I noticed was LPP loading a little bit faster on startup.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well every little bit counts doesn't it?.....ty for trying it tho and posting ya score....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium

bigfdaddy said:
Well every little bit counts doesn't it?.....ty for trying it tho and posting ya score....
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Np.. just saying everytime I flash a nightly I have to do this.. it's annoying as hell where as I just flash ScaryStable once with each nightly flash and I'm good to go and I notice a HUGE difference in performance.

For what it's worth, the V6 Supercharger (currently running the update9 beta) provides an optimal RAM manager which eliminated my habit of installing AutoKiller w/ every ROM. Since running the Supercharger script, I've consistently ran w/ 175-180MB in free RAM w/ no app FC's. That alone is worth using this mod in my book.

Ty 4 trying.....tying to expand this to more people and let them know about it.I.think its worth all the hype and attention I can give it.
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium

Do quadrant scores really matter?

So I was running Mostly Stock for a long time, and was pretty happy with it...except for the periodic annoying EL3
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA

Let's try that again So I've been on mostly stock...not overclocked. I was normally getting around 18-1950 quadrant scores... So I updated to Sleeper ROM (el30, odexed)...it seems about the same performance-wise...but I only get ~1300 on quadrant!
I was wondering if that was some effect of the odexed vs deodexed...but I don't see how. I don't see a difference in my daily driving...just thought I would ask what other people feel about such things...
Also, I'm still running ext4... If I can convince myself to go MTD, I would probably try clean GB... But I don't want to go back to rds...
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA

RDS... My typing was a victim of Swype...
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA

Cluefree said:
Let's try that again So I've been on mostly stock...not overclocked. I was normally getting around 18-1950 quadrant scores... So I updated to Sleeper ROM (el30, odexed)...it seems about the same performance-wise...but I only get ~1300 on quadrant!
I was wondering if that was some effect of the odexed vs deodexed...but I don't see how. I don't see a difference in my daily driving...just thought I would ask what other people feel about such things...
Also, I'm still running ext4... If I can convince myself to go MTD, I would probably try clean GB... But I don't want to go back to rds...
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nope its more for fps testing. It has no real world preformance meaning...

No. They can be fooled with scripts. The only thing that should ever matter is how fast a ROM seems to you.
Sent from my PantechP4100 using xda premium

R F S sigh
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA

Of course they are !!!!!!
How else would we compare e-peens on here

Trololol. But seriously, mtd performs the best but the quadrants are a little lower than ext4. So basically, it means nothing.
That's why I'm not sure why all the phone review n comparison videos use quadrant to test performance. Then I laugh when it tells them one phone is "faster" than the other but the specs are worse XD.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium

The scores are a great way to determine what setup works best on each specific phone, but does a poor job of comparing performance between different phones.
As such, if you are looking at the scores in respect to what others got, its not much of a help
But if you are using it for what makes your phone work better, as far as different ROMs, Kernels, and different combos, then it can be very helpful

I feel like Antutu seems to score in an arbitrary way that works. I can't say why but the number match the performance I feel more often than not. Some outliers, but a decent way to compare on some level.

My Galaxy S3 Quadrant Score : 8727 Really!.

I have not seen the wrong friends .. I developed a new missile with rum was like the Galaxy s3. We have i3 CPU processor equivalent notebooks.
Country : Turkey - Manisa

Well, there is an app that boosts quadrant score, so quadrant isn´t reliable, at least to show off in the internet.

Faked.
This thread ****ing sucks.

unless you can tell us what cpu, gpu speed this is and PROVE you haven't got a quadrant booster installed..... this is fake.

Showing off fake does not make you feel any better.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium

2 posts in 4 years @[email protected] Says a lot really LOL

Drakenfall said:
Well, there is an app that boosts quadrant score, so quadrant isn´t reliable, at least to show off in the internet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
paintball23456 said:
unless you can tell us what cpu, gpu speed this is and PROVE you haven't got a quadrant booster installed..... this is fake.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not that i don't think this is fake,but quadrant booster boosts the io points by loading the app's data into ram so it'll past the database read/write at blazingly fast speed.
If you look at the chart you'll see the green section(the io) is at normal level,so he's not using this.
But if you look at the blue section(the cpu) you'll see that these scores are skyrocketed!
So he's overclocked to hell this phone,or he's just using an optimus g or something that has this kind of cpu performance.

Scores with quadrant are equal to none. Its unreliable and even if you get a high or low score it says nothing about your phone
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app

nfsmw_gr said:
Not that i don't think this is fake,but quadrant booster boosts the io points by loading the app's data into ram so it'll past the database read/write at blazingly fast speed.
If you look at the chart you'll see the green section(the io) is at normal level,so he's not using this.
But if you look at the blue section(the cpu) you'll see that these scores are skyrocketed!
So he's overclocked to hell this phone,or he's just using an optimus g or something that has this kind of cpu performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cpu 1.7 ghz my kernel kayakernel

Lol this is mine overclocked to 1.6 ghz..... 6264 quadrant...so his score is fake :beer:
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium

OZAN4545 said:
cpu 1.7 ghz my kernel kayakernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
And can you share your kernel?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium

viking37 said:
Hi,
And can you share your kernel?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just look in original development bud. Siyah kernel.

78cortina said:
Just look in original development bud. Siyah kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hum... Because kayakernel = Siyah kernel... ??? :what: weird
And thanks I know Siyah kernel...
After that if people can't write right a kernel name...
This CPU score of about 28 000 at 1.7 Ghz, even with Siyah kernel, how?, ROM, other tweaks, settings?
I realy don't know how it's possible... Something is strange.
I would like to see an Antutu score, Cf-Bench and Vellamo...
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using xda app-developers app

Please share all relevant info please fill in the gaps
ROM:
KERNEL: SIYAH
CPU: 1.7
GPU steps:
Stweaks config:
Just so others can test this for themselves
im what Willis was talking about

.........7 inches
.......ooooooops, my apologies, I thought you said " compare d*ck size"

Yeah, it's really? Show me a video...

Bilux said:
Yeah, it's really? Show me a video...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^^....if you are talking to me....then NO!....I won't show you a video!

slaphead20 said:
^^^....if you are talking to me....then NO!....I won't show you a video!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can get similar videos all over the net though
《posted from samsung rom》

i think the score.makes sense. he is using the older version of.quadrant
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium

Tweaked system settings, no big deal good for running one program and nothing else. Like running something with a priority of realtime in Windows.
Pump the CPU to stay at 1.7, run Quadrant exit out go to console raise its nice priority etc, go back and bingo nice big scores!
What's the point of this post, to show all you can use System Tuner or scripts or the console?

Quadrant Benchmark Results[Parandroid 2.+ ROM_Lupus JBv6 Kernel]

Im using Parandroid for xperia arcs and my kernel is Lupus JBv6.
my sys info and results:

okay cool
lol

Okay... But I don't think there's really a need of these kinds of threads.

We are proud of you

i just wanna show the performance of the arcs LT18i, using this kernel and rom. i did what i did because someone, may wanna use this two, could see before using it. simply to help someone to get first idea.
thanks.

I'm using a JB ROM, with Lupus Kernel, I scored 1200+ set at 1.2ghz and OnDemand governor.
Sent from my Xperia Arc S using xda app-developers app

stu15 said:
I'm using a JB ROM, with Lupus Kernel, I scored 1200+ set at 1.2ghz and OnDemand governor.
Sent from my Xperia Arc S using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cool. which rom? i may try it. my options were the same.
now i test it again at 1.6ghz and onDemand governor and i got 1286.

aliemrey said:
cool. which rom? i may try it. my options were the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's just JellyBean V_06, it's in the arc guide and lists etc, under the stickies in general, though I'm not using it now, had a couple of stability issues.
Sent from my LT18i using xda app-developers app

Quadrant is useless xD ..don''t understand why people use it...maybe a rom scores a lot but using it it's **** !

Sorin90 said:
Quadrant is useless xD ..don''t understand why people use it...maybe a rom scores a lot but using it it's **** !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
maybe u r right. but i see no harm to try all kind of benchmark apps to rate.

aliemrey said:
maybe u r right. but i see no harm to try all kind of benchmark apps to rate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try Antutu.
Sent from my LT18i using xda app-developers app

stu15 said:
Try Antutu.
Sent from my LT18i using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im already tried antutu. i installed both quadrant and antutu. as i said, i see no harm to try all kind of benchmark apps.
for my benchmark result using antutu, u can use following link; http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=37214993&postcount=70
purpose of this thread is to see "quadrant Benchmark results on lt18i with specific kernels and roms. not to compare with others.
however, thank for advice.
best regards.