Related
I just noticed how epicly sneakily SE are in designing their product.
Epic love heart ftw. Anybody got anymore to share??
Sent from my X10i using Tapatalk
Hahaha!!! thats awesome spotting mate!!
thats just plain clever, and i bet they did that on purpose
Congratulations for discovering the hot water...
although you would think at first it is just for design its actually a waste reduction system, you can have a sheet of plastic with them all under each other and no issues with massive waste.
also it means they'll probably mould as the heart shape then slice down the middle hence the symmetrical design
http://m.techradar.com/news/phone-a...ones/samsung-galaxy-s3-specs-revealed-1066807
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Hope they have LTE in my area (Miami) by then
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
The "source" of these rumors none other than BGR...
Nothing but a low class gossip website that will say anything for page clicks.
ap3604 said:
The "source" of these rumors none other than BGR...
Nothing but a low class gossip website that will say anything for page clicks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AN Apple fansite nonetheless.
Hope this turns out to be true. Ceramic chassis sounds really really nice and very industrial. Maybe they're going for the iPhone 4 look?
I hope they aren't trying to make it look like an iAnything. You think they would stay away from that especially in light of all Apple suing them for everything. Plus I'd love a unique awesome look!
Alucardis666 said:
Hope this turns out to be true. Ceramic chassis sounds really really nice and very industrial. Maybe they're going for the iPhone 4 look?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if they were going for an iphone 4 look, they would make it look like broken glass.
looks nice...
Love exynos, but is this Samsung's first-generation of LTE?
I believe Samsung will be using a sister chip for the LTE, until they can perfect their own integrated solution.
They never did have their own solution - for radios they're using Infineon (now Intel) chips. The GS2 is XMM6260 or something like that, the next gen (not out yet, has LTE) is XMM7060.
Ceramic chassis? No thanks, I actually like plastic. It doesn't break or shatter and is extremely light. Also, I don't see a removable battery or external sd being done with that type of chassis.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA App
Nerz said:
Ceramic chassis? No thanks, I actually like plastic. It doesn't break or shatter and is extremely light. Also, I don't see a removable battery or external sd being done with that type of chassis.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Last thing I need is for my phone to shatter first time I drop it..
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Nerz said:
Ceramic chassis? No thanks, I actually like plastic. It doesn't break or shatter and is extremely light. Also, I don't see a removable battery or external sd being done with that type of chassis.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cermamic is incredibly strong and rigid in certain applications. It's used in racing components, as heat shield coatings, reinforments. It's even popular with thw aerospace industry. Very durable...If the S3 goes with a ceramic chasis, I'm sold.
Sent from my Rocket in the Sky (SGH-i727) using XDA Premium.
--------------------------------
To make requests or suggestions, go here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=22914429#post22914429
XDA rules can be found here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/announcement.php?a=81
A great video explaining how XDA works, can be found here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmvCpR45LKA&feature=youtube_gdata_player
mgd76 said:
Love exynos, but is this Samsung's first-generation of LTE?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will be first generation LTE with the Exynos CPU. Skyrocket is LTE with SnapDragon S3 CPU.
Sent from my Rocket in the Sky (SGH-i727) using XDA Premium.
--------------------------------
To make requests or suggestions, go here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=22914429#post22914429
XDA rules can be found here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/announcement.php?a=81
A great video explaining how XDA works, can be found here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmvCpR45LKA&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Nerz said:
Ceramic chassis? No thanks, I actually like plastic. It doesn't break or shatter and is extremely light. Also, I don't see a removable battery or external sd being done with that type of chassis.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This. Coming from an iPhone 4 makes me appreciate the plastic backing of our phones. Won't chip from the slightest drop like my iPhone did.
Well, I'm leery of 1st-Gen LTE chips. I will not be an early adopter with the sgs3... Especially since Sammy will launch the sgs3+ two weeks later with the "super LTE" chips :-(
More rumors stating the GS3 will be the first phone to run a true 1080p screen beating out even Apple with their Retina screen. Not that you can really tell a difference on such a small device that at most would be used 3 feet away from your face.
http://pocketnow.com/android/galaxy-s-iii-to-feature-first-1080p-smartphone-display
NJGSII said:
This. Coming from an iPhone 4 makes me appreciate the plastic backing of our phones. Won't chip from the slightest drop like my iPhone did.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 here my buddy's Iphone 4 fell off his lap and chipped his back glass.
sent from my CM9 powered cappy
As with others I would rather have plastic, Carbon Fiber would be neat though
Specs are not credible so no need to wish over them
First gen LTE on Exynos is what will make me pass... HSPA is more than fast enough for me and I see many bugs with it (LTE)
PeartFan40 said:
Cermamic is incredibly strong and rigid in certain applications. It's used in racing components, as heat shield coatings, reinforments. It's even popular with thw aerospace industry. Very durable...If the S3 goes with a ceramic chasis, I'm sold.
Sent from my Rocket in the Sky (SGH-i727) using XDA Premium.
[/url]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is true but i don't think these things get dropped much . Which even if it could withstand it, I just don't like the fact that most likely with the type of enclosure, it won't have a removable battery cover. Furthermore with the design behaviors currently leaning towards as few buttons and ports as possible, for that clean look, there most likely won't be and external sd card.
Although I'm just griping, I love Samsung phones, and I will most likely still get it if the temptation somehow pries me from my wonderful sgs2
First of all I have to say, the Samsung Galaxy S3 looks veeeery good to me.
You want to know why?
1. Unique design, more curvy which definately will give you a better feeling when holding the phone in your hand. Just look at your palm, is it completely flat? I don't think so. Therefore it's easier to hold a curvy S3 in your hand compared to an angular shaped S2. I really think the S3 looks better and gives you more comfort just by seeing the way it's designed.
2. Plastic, it's very sturdy and therefore less damage can happen when it's dropped e.g. to the floor. Drop an iPhone/HTC and get ready to call the service line.
3. Weight, plastic is the way to go if you want a thin and light phone. Some people here sound as if they would like a flipping phone made out of solid osmium (heaviest of all metals)
4. Replaceable components, seriously guys, UNIBODY MY ASS, I want to be able to replace the battery without having to send it to Samsung and wait for the service to fix it. On top of that Unibody doesn't allow you to buy a bigger battery for your phone (though I think the stock 2100 mAh already is good!)
And no SD Card slot like the HTC One X? LOL.
5. Sorry for my english
Those being just some arguments which definately make reasonable why Sammy doesn't choose as same path as HTC/Apple.
Fair points, but I'm still disappointed they went the high gloss route. IMO, if it was matt plastic it would be far more appealing.
Master05 said:
1. Unique design, more curvy which definately will give you a better feeling when holding the phone in your hand. Just look at your palm, is it completely flat? I don't think so. Therefore it's easier to hold a curvy S3 in your hand compared to an angular shaped S2. I really think the S3 looks better and gives you more comfort just by seeing the way it's designed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure the design is totally unique, kind remind me of the Plam Pre.
Can you see the similarity?
The back of the phone comes completely off. I'm sure there will be hundreds of back plates to choose from.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Bigmille said:
I'm not sure the design is totally unique, kind remind me of the Plam Pre.
Can you see the similarity?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Talking about similarities, just a couple of days ago I found this article very amusing..
Plastic is a terrible conductor of heat.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Nice talk.you are a genius.like your points
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
edcoppen said:
Fair points, but I'm still disappointed they went the high gloss route. IMO, if it was matt plastic it would be far more appealing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. I personally like the back cover of the Galaxy Nexus. I'm not a fan of high gloss. Some kind of texture would would have been nice.
edcoppen said:
Fair points, but I'm still disappointed they went the high gloss route. IMO, if it was matt plastic it would be far more appealing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's only a bit of plastic on the back that I'm sure you'll be able to buy third party ones.
ciscostud said:
The back of the phone comes completely off. I'm sure there will be hundreds of back plates to choose from.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can surely find lots of interesting faceplates and back covers for the SIII, even my Galaxy Ace has tons of awesome looking designs on a design store in an Indian Website(that's in english)
I find it amusing that people somehow think the HOX is not made of plastic. Polycarbonates are a group of plastics.
Sent from my Nook Tablet using xda premium
rete said:
I find it amusing that people somehow think the HOX is not made of plastic. Polycarbonates are a group of plastics.
Sent from my Nook Tablet using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
me too.
rete said:
I find it amusing that people somehow think the HOX is not made of plastic. Polycarbonates are a group of plastics.
Sent from my Nook Tablet using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's the same reason why people that own german cars think they have a better quality material eventhough it's the same plastic used in other brands just in different texture
i find it amusing that people think samsung doesnt use metal. the screen is bonded to a cast frame presumably aluminum but maybe magnesium on all the phones i have repaired. remove the battery and scrape the black area underneath with a sharp metal object if you dont believe me. the plastic they use is not only tough and fracture resistant but it's pretty much superficial.
now im sure htc has improved their designs but the evo was toy like in construction. thin cheap plastics and the pcb was a thin single layer design and the copper traces could easily seperate from the board. also the one i repaired had cold solder joints and the spring contacts they used in place or cables were falling off the board.
samsung does things that are frustrating from a development point of view but i never agreed with the quality argument.
well i'm looking forward to the s3 for the audio mostly. but i want to see what challenges the hardware offers aosp development. though i like touch wiz i dont expect samsung to support the device for more than 1 or 2 major updates. i have learned my lesson and will only buy the us version if it is the same hardware profile as the international version. and ill only buy an s3 if the bt and other hardware are aosp friendly.
Bigmille said:
I'm not sure the design is totally unique, kind remind me of the Plam Pre.
Can you see the similarity?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or this. Yours for only $89.
rete said:
I find it amusing that people somehow think the HOX is not made of plastic. Polycarbonates are a group of plastics.
Sent from my Nook Tablet using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you but HOX looks more sleek. Shiny plastics give the GS3 a feel of cheaper phone. Can't wait to hold it to see how it feels in real life.
ph00ny said:
It's the same reason why people that own german cars think they have a better quality material eventhough it's the same plastic used in other brands just in different texture
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
German cars do have a better quality , I know from experience. But I get your point its how you use the material.
I think the plastic on the back of my galaxy nexus feels great .
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Sim-1 said:
I agree with you but HOX looks more sleek. Shiny plastics give the GS3 a feel of cheaper phone. Can't wait to hold it to see how it feels in real life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sure they will make a back that's matt just like the hox
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Yep replacement battery all the way!
I bought this on eBay thinking it was an aluminum case. I just got in the mail and opened it up to find it is a battery cover. I love it! Replace the flimsy one with the aluminum. It adds a bit of weight too. The stock cover goes in the box now.
Nice. Who makes that one?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
It clearly says it's a battery door replacement but I didn't read lol
http://www.ebay.com/itm/16082094015...AX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649#ht_500wt_1287
Since metals are opaque to radio waves, your signal strength must have plummeted.
Full bars bro...
Sent from my badass Samsung Galaxy SIII
ReggieTee said:
Full bars bro...
Sent from my badass Samsung Galaxy SIII
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try it in an area where you don't have full bars with the battery door on and off. Or just read off decibel level of the signal from Settings/About/Status.
Bro.
I heard the aluminum back covers screw with nfc
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
nabbed said:
Since metals are opaque to radio waves, your signal strength must have plummeted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correction. Grounded metals are opaque to radio waves.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
jnadke said:
Correction. Grounded metals are opaque to radio waves.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think so. It doesn't matter if a piece of metal is grounded or not, it will absorb most radio frequencies.
It's $12 and looks good. If it affects anything, I have the option of removing it lol.
Sent from my badass Samsung Galaxy SIII
You owe me 40.00 my wife saw this
http://item.mobileweb.ebay.com/viewitem?itemId=160820596085&index=8&nav=SEARCH&nid=65699023939
And ordered 3 & clear cases to go over
Lol thanks
Sent from my Sprint Galaxy Nexus CDMA using Xparent ICS Blue Tapatalk 2
Epix4G said:
You owe me 40.00 my wife saw this
http://item.mobileweb.ebay.com/viewitem?itemId=160820596085&index=8&nav=SEARCH&nid=65699023939
And ordered 3 & clear cases to go over
Lol thanks
Sent from my Sprint Galaxy Nexus CDMA using Xparent ICS Blue Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol sorry!
the metal case has to reflect/degrade signal, since that was a major issue with my Transformer prime and its all metal back. which people found that if they removed it or repositioned antennas that the signal would improve by a ton.
nabbed said:
I don't think so. It doesn't matter if a piece of metal is grounded or not, it will absorb most radio frequencies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know if absorb is the word of choice. Without getting overly technical for the average person, metal impedes/obstructs radio signals severely if the antenna is inside of the metal enclosure or wall. Elevators are big metal boxes that kill signal really easily if you're inside them. Trees are big rf attenuators depending on the frequency of the radio. Even a hand or body very near or touching an antenna will greatly reduce your signal tx/rx. RF is a strange thing and can be affected both good and bad by many different kinds of external objects.
oscarthegrouch said:
I don't know if absorb is the word of choice. Without getting overly technical for the average person, metal impedes/obstructs radio signals severely if the antenna is inside of the metal enclosure or wall. Elevators are big metal boxes that kill signal really easily if you're inside them. Trees are big rf attenuators depending on the frequency of the radio. Even a hand or body very near or touching an antenna will greatly reduce your signal tx/rx. RF is a strange thing and can be affected both good and bad by many different kinds of external objects.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think absorb is the right word.
Here's a snippet from an Argonne writeup:
Electrons in metals can slosh back and forth in a piece of metal at slow frequencies, and so metals absorb radio at nearly all frequencies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/phy99/phy99245.htm
I have to saw that with this cover the headphone jack is affected. It won't allow the plug to go all the way in and the sound is affected. That sucks.
Edit: This is incorrect. I didn't have it plugged in all the way.
nabbed said:
I think absorb is the right word.
Here's a snippet from an Argonne writeup:
http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/phy99/phy99245.htm
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AFAIK, that site, and the person writing that article is wrong. I will have to ask someone I know who was an electrical engineer and amateur radio operator (extra class) if that gov site is correct. Everything I've learned about RF, before and after I got my radio license, tells me that guy is wrong. I'm not trying to start an argument with anyone either. I'm debating this issue. http://www.iphelp.ru/faq/9/ch02lev1sec6.html is a link explaining rf behavior in wlan situations, but the gist of it holds true with what I've learned with HF/VHF/UHF and microwave bands. If anyone here is a ham radio operator, please chime in with your input. The statement the scientist said that something needs to be a wavelength thick to affect rf is bs. Like I said before, I'm not trying to start anything with anyone. I am not saying I am smarter or better either. I just have had some training and hands on experience with antennas and building a few from scratch and testing their performance.
oscarthegrouch said:
AFAIK, that site, and the person writing that article is wrong. I will have to ask someone I know who was an electrical engineer and amateur radio operator (extra class) if that gov site is correct. Everything I've learned about RF, before and after I got my radio license, tells me that guy is wrong. I'm not trying to start an argument with anyone either. I'm debating this issue. http://www.iphelp.ru/faq/9/ch02lev1sec6.html is a link explaining rf behavior in wlan situations, but the gist of it holds true with what I've learned with HF/VHF/UHF and microwave bands. If anyone here is a ham radio operator, please chime in with your input. The statement the scientist said that something needs to be a wavelength thick to affect rf is bs. Like I said before, I'm not trying to start anything with anyone. I am not saying I am smarter or better either. I just have had some training and hands on experience with antennas and building a few from scratch and testing their performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is simple physics. Please don't fight science in your ignorance.
Gotta love how even the simplest debate on xda can end in one member attempting to belittle another.
mlin said:
Gotta love how even the simplest debate on xda can end in one member attempting to belittle another.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everybody put ur flame suits on
Sent from my SPH-L710 using XDA
Edit can anybody help me out with "external..izing?" The antenna ? Haha
Erica Griffin stated that they use phosphorus in the screen of the Sony Z2.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SS5DlQIhLTM
Can anyone confirm this? Do they use phosphorous substances in the screen? Is this phosphorus radioactive? Way back the use of (some form of) phosphorus was banned in watches etc. because it destroys your eyes.
SuperMarioGalaxy said:
Erica Griffin stated that they use phosphorus in the screen of the Sony Z2.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SS5DlQIhLTM
Can anyone confirm this? Do they use phosphorous substances in the screen? Is this phosphorus radioactive? Way back the use of (some form of) phosphorus was banned in watches etc. because it destroys your eyes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A banana is very radioactive as well. Do you avoid eating bananas?
SuperMarioGalaxy said:
Erica Griffin stated that they use phosphorus in the screen of the Sony Z2.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SS5DlQIhLTM
Can anyone confirm this? Do they use phosphorous substances in the screen? Is this phosphorus radioactive? Way back the use of (some form of) phosphorus was banned in watches etc. because it destroys your eyes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is enough internet for today... (just 1PM :crying
I'm actually serious about this. The use of some phosphorus substance is banned because of its ill effects. So unless someone can verify what is used on this phone I won't buy it and suggest others to keep from it also.
SuperMarioGalaxy said:
I'm actually serious about this. The use of some phosphorus substance is banned because of its ill effects. So unless someone can verify what is used on this phone I won't buy it and suggest others to keep from it also.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good news! That means there will be one more device available for someone who really wants it.
Why is everyone taking this so lightly or as a joke? Detrimenting one's eyesight is no joke to me...
SuperMarioGalaxy said:
Why is everyone taking this so lightly or as a joke? Detrimenting one's eyesight is no joke to me...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think it's a joke.
Sent from my D6503 using XDA Free mobile app
PLEASE..... , she's a great reviewer (when reviewing) , but her ocd problem with over analysing every little tiny aspect of a mobile phone is a bit too much for me..:silly:
How many different things do we have to be careful about this week, as long as you do everything in moderation and NOT to access then you'll be fine..............just enjoy your phone & chill out...
LOL! Usually paid Samsung trolls like you suck, but you're hilarious.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
Zamboney said:
LOL! Usually paid Samsung trolls like you suck, but you're hilarious.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
& this is aimed at who? you own a Samsung Galaxy Note....:laugh:.
Does that mean when you are sleeping with the phone charging next to your bed the phosphorus meanines come out through one of the flaps & nuke my eyes & sperm :silly:
Phosphorus is not radioactive, infact it's quite the wonder element. It's used in applications such as softening water, used to remove impurities from glass, used as fertiliser, heck you piss it out as the substance is formed in your body in the kidneys when removing contaminants.
I haven't watched the video but since it's that same woman who was bothered about staining when the device was being handled by hundreds of people, I have little faith in what she says anyway.
Zamboney said:
LOL! Usually paid Samsung trolls like you suck, but you're hilarious.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm no paid Samsung troll. If anything, I'm a bit of a Sony fan. I didn't want to make a huge deal out of this to scare people, hence the lame title etc. I just wanted to know if there really is a harmful substance used in the screen.
TheOnlyIntruder said:
Phosphorus is not radioactive, infact it's quite the wonder element. It's used in applications such as softening water, used to remove impurities from glass, used as fertiliser, heck you piss it out as the substance is formed in your body in the kidneys when removing contaminants.
I haven't watched the video but since it's that same woman who was bothered about staining when the device was being handled by hundreds of people, I have little faith in what she says anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I'm perfectly aware that Phosphorus isn't radioactive in itself and its a necessity to life and its being wasted when we pee in a toilet, thus degrading the soil unnecessarily. But there are isotopes that are radioactive and that some harmful phosphorus substances have been used in for example watches that illuminate the hands in the dark. This was later deemed dangerous to eyesight.
One misconception I want to clear: Although Erica might be a "bit" neurotic, or maybe just because of that, she certainly knows her nitbits. She never said anything about the phosphorus being dangerous. It just rang in my ear. She stated at 5:34 that they used red and green phosphorus and a blue backlight. The Triluminos tech is explained in the video so that a blue backlight excites the red and green phosphorus and so they get a wide color gamut. I'm no physicist but maybe someone else can explain this better. Basically the problem is not that it would ill you from your bedside table, but when the display is on, whatever the phosphorus is emitting when excited (be it radioactive or only light) is going straight to your eye. If you use this technology for several hours a day for years its bound to affect something, IF there are any effects to be had. I'm not trying to cause a panic or steer people away from buying this (I have mine on preorder too), I would just want to understand what this is.
I'm not completely sure but I think that traditional LEDs don't use this kind of technology and they use regular diodes with no phosphorus in them.
Thoughts? Physicists that could explain this?
Jeesus dude stop being so psichotic. I mean with all current regulations and safety requirements do you really think a company size of sony would use something harmful to human beings? Maybe you should worry about GM foods you ingest everyday, instead of such trivial things.
Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk 2
feis said:
Jeesus dude stop being so psichotic. I mean with all current regulations and safety requirements do you really think a company size of sony would use something harmful to human beings? Maybe you should worry about GM foods you ingest everyday, instead of such trivial things.
Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm in no way psychotic, wtf?! Many have used harmful stuff. We still don't know if cell phone radiowaves are harmful in the long run. Also electrical equipments create magnetic fields that affect us. You are deluded to think that no-one would produce anything harmful either by not knowing it is or knowingly. Jfyi, I try not to eat GM-foods but if I didn't eat them at all, life would be really hard. I just don't fret about it. Usually I don't fret about things at all, this just sounded very weird to me. And this is not a trivial thing to me, I value my eyesight thank you very much. I've been grown to think light emitting phosphorus is harmful. Same way if you heard that something had asbest in it, you would go inhaling it right away, right?
banzibaby said:
does that mean when you are sleeping with the phone charging next to your bed the phosphorus meanines come out through one of the flaps & nuke my eyes & sperm :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol made my day! +1
you would go inhaling it right away, right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes ......I am inhaling right now.....& boy is it good.......
I mean we live in such a world that you cannot possibly avoid everything that maybe harmful to you, and there are many unclear things and their effects to human in todays technology, and i can guarantee you no one in this forum can give you answers for your question with proof or say medical experments, so just go for other phone if you are that worried about this stuff. For me this is trivial, and i have bigger problems than worrying about something i know nothing about and just heard a single word about it in a single review. Ps english is not my native language, i probably meant paranoid not psychotic.
Sent from my D6503 using Tapatalk 2
feis said:
Jeesus dude stop being so psichotic. I mean with all current regulations and safety requirements do you really think a company size of sony would use something harmful to human beings?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is exactly it, if the phone screen emitted UV radiation (which is what I believe you're thinking of) there would be warnings in place explaining if it did and the amount it would output. Not only that but even if the diodes had enough power to emit UV radiation, there is a glass panel in the way and if you didn't know already, glass blocks upto 99.99% of UV light, an example of such is when you see someone who wears transition glasses, the glasses don't transition when in side of the car, even if strong sunlight is shinning through simply because the windows are blocking UV light.
Our phones aren't equipped with flashbangs, they aren't going to blind us.
As for radiation in general, all elements have radiation isotopes, most naturally found elements are those that have decayed from another element and become stable since the half-life becomes in the millions of years range.
Hey OP, It's phosphor - not phosphorous. Plasma and many other displays use those.In fact, Panasonic's VT/ZT series use fast switching phosphors and those are simply the best TVs in the market. They are not harmful as long as you don't break the glass and start poking at them with your finger. Same thing applies to batteries. You can chillax now.