Database Users

jellybean benchmarks *nexus s*

Hi guys n gals. Got a case of insomnia tonight so I flashed 4.1 and thought I'd try and tweak it out. Be fun to see how others on 4.1 are doing.
Antutu | Nenamark 2 | Vellamo
My setup
Jrn84d v6a | glados 2.11 bfs
1540mhz CPU over clock stable
220mhz GPU bus over clock
Antutu (screen shot when post count is met)
3665
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Nenamark 2
30.1fps
Vellamo
1481
Still tinkering

halfaddict said:
Hi guys n gals. Got a case of insomnia tonight so I flashed 4.1 and thought I'd try and tweak it out. Be fun to see how others on 4.1 are doing.
Antutu | Nenamark 2 | Vellamo
My setup
Jrn84d v6a | glados 2.11 bfs
1540mhz CPU over clock stable
220mhz GPU bus over clock
Antutu (screen shot when post count is met)
3584
Nenamark 2
30.1fps
Still tinkering
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You do realize that JB hasnt been released for Nexus S , right?
So basically you flashed a port based of the SDK which isnt a true representation of JB

Ieatnoobs said:
You do realize that JB hasnt been released for Nexus S , right?
So basically you flashed a port based of the SDK which isnt a true representation of JB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just for fun while awaiting for official one... No matter it will or will not shown real JB potential
Mine only benchmark on Antutu. Using Oodie JB with Thelamus Kernel. I get 2764...
Sent from my GT-P6800 using Tapatalk 2

Ieatnoobs said:
You do realize that JB hasnt been released for Nexus S , right?
So basically you flashed a port based of the SDK which isnt a true representation of JB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its purely for fun, but if I'm not mistaken the rom I'm on is based off OTA for galaxy nexus NOT an SDK.

pics up .. not sure why antutu doesn't see the cpu freq but it is 1540
if anyone wants to see another bench lmk

Good work mate :thumbup:
Sent from my Nexus S (JB 4.1 SDK port Steven) using xda premium

Hater let him be
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium

vellamo score is pretty good

Ieatnoobs said:
You do realize that JB hasnt been released for Nexus S , right?
So basically you flashed a port based of the SDK which isnt a true representation of JB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now that it's officially out I have to say that we don't need any benchmark to understand that the difference is minimal.

The boost in Vellamo scores with Jellybean is huge!, super impressive for a single core phone.

The last portion of the rest on vellamo always fails for me. The network bit.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2

Quadrant Benckmark Results on Stock JB 4.1.1

My TF300T has been suffering from many problems like random reboots, freezing and showing the app not responding popup, low fps in games, etc.
I would like to know if my tablet is faulty, or I should just void the warranty and install a custom rom.
These are my quadrant benchmark results (after a reboot, performance mode):
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
The IO results are really horrible here, and I think its the main cause of the slow performance on this tablet. (Even my 1st gen Kindle Fire gets 2263 for IO)
FYI, I have already done a factory reset after updating to JB.
Can other users on Stock JB post their Quadrant Benchmark Results here too? I want to see if my benchmark result is normal.
EDIT: I just did a factory reset (again), and the results improved by a little bit. Is this the best I can get without unlocking the bootloader?

At first i did not want to unlock my tablet, but i couldn't live with the terrible i/o.
I unlocked the device and installed [email protected] rom. The tablet is flying.
Look at the quadrant results, that's all i can say.

with the new OC Version I get about 6400 on Quadrant
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1901784

archspijkenisse said:
At first i did not want to unlock my tablet, but i couldn't live with the terrible i/o.
I unlocked the device and installed [email protected] rom. The tablet is flying.
Look at the quadrant results, that's all i can say.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mikaole said:
with the new OC Version I get about 6400 on Quadrant
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1901784
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks, I have decided to unlock my tablet.. i'll try The Ultra Fast Rom - JB Overclock Edition V02 !
i dont quite like the modified icons in the @blue rom..

Strange, check this out http://db.tt/G5a2UqLW I got over 3k on stock Samsung ICS, did the JB update brakes the I/O?
Wysyłane z mojego ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T za pomocą Tapatalk 2

This is my quadrant scrores (data partition is mounted to mmcblk1p2 aka sdcard second partiton, sadly these result are still with the slow class 6 card, because i get extreme pro card next week) And cpu is 1.8ghz

[BENCHMARKS] Post Your Results

I am hereby Making a Benchmark thread for our U8800Pro.
According to me this results will help us decide what is the most fast and stable ROM till date.
So be free and post your benchmarks here.
Example:-
ROM used-ShenduOS-4.1.2-121228-Dev
Mods used-
*KickAssKernel script
*V6SuperCharger script(Zeppelinrox)
*Seeder Entropy 2.0
*Adrenaline Injector(by me)
CPU Frequency used-
1805Ghz
AnTuTu-
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Quadrant-
That was just an example you can use any of the two Softwares Antutu or quadrant as per your choice.
This is not for competition purposes
-Rik[Rittik]

keep in mind that benchmarks don't show real world performance.You can have a great score and the rom being buggy as hell at the same time..!

u 8800-51 divice with SheDu pro v2.0.4
CPU Frequency 1600, guvernator - ondemand
no lag no bug

the best antutu benckmark is mine with my rom, my benckmark is 6630 with 1804 mhz but i have not the screen because i do that benchkmark in the past

pointless thread.with all the respect.this is something like show me your homescreen to tell which rom is the best.

Highest benchmark does not mean faster or more stable ROM.
Sent from my U8800Pro using Tapatalk 2

I told stable.. Even 4.2.2 is stable but has many issues.. Stability doesnt depend upon bugs it depends on kernels(i may be wrong). Even b929 is unstable with Geno's earlier kernel multiple reboots..
There are roms which are stable but not fit for everyday use
-Rik[Rittik]

Baydu Yi 2.1

Hello, my result:
ROM used: CuvettoJB v 1.2
CPU Frequency used: 1805Ghz
Testing app AnTuTu.
Score: 6181
Sent from my U8800Pro using xda app-developers app

Sent from my U8800pro using Tapatalk 2

Hello, my result:
ROM used: CuvettoJB v 1.2
CPU Frequency used: 1405Ghz
Testing app AnTuTu.
Score: 5317
with SwapIt Expander I have almost no reboot at all (1-2 at week) :victory:

ROM 929 by Nikitines
SD 4Gb 6 Class
I/O !!!!!!

Antutu Benchmark i9195

Hey guys, here is my Antutu test of CyanogenMod11
I'm really proud of our device it's getting better with CyanogenMod11, better then XPERIA Z and Note 2.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Please post here your Antutu tests if better on stock rom or other roms!​

:laugh: :silly: :good: :fingers-crossed:

Sam Solomon said:
:laugh: :silly: :good: :fingers-crossed:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
20655 here... (CM11)

Tests does not matter much
My GT-I9192 S4 mini duos
My rom & kernel ( build for battery performance not high scores )

artu72 said:
20655 here... (CM11)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SilviuMik said:
Tests does not matter much
My GT-I9192 S4 mini duos
My rom & kernel ( build for battery performance not high scores )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah,Benchmark except Nenamark are all waste I just do for Show Off :victory: I'm new over here...My Old Device was scoring 8000+ only...
BTW My SS is from Stock BML2 ROM ..... I get 21,667 with CM11 .... But bad time...Phone got some weird touch issues

All the colorful bars are pretty, but TW still lags on my i9192, even with a different launcher.

Kernel: Amestris 2.7
Gouverneur: badass
Recovery: TWRP 2.7
Stock Rom: UBUBMK4
Cleaned Deodexed
Sent from my GT-I9192 using xda premium

I have the Highest Benchmark Score and Luckily my phone was the one who burnt inside out :highfive: Why Samsung..Why ?

Only 1470 on stock touch wiz, a sign to get another rom.

Stock Rom guys, no root, just stock, after 1 week of usage!!! What do you think?

post very interesting ! :angel: ==> http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=54580074&postcount=98

I think my S4 Mini is the best S4 Mini...LOL
Stock Deodexed Kitkat...rooted.
Anyway putting aside benchmarks my S4 Mini performs superbly. Real time performance is what matters and I have no issues as of now. Smooth UI, lag-free gaming and decent battery life with great network.

To make this all reliable: those of you running the stock firmware and rooted should run a test with and without disabling DVFS to proof the benchmark boost. And then it would be best to run a third test on CM but always with same settings, user app installs, etc.

20178 on CarbonROM build 20140727, no performance changes (384-1728MHz, interactive, row)

I9192 Duos KitKat
My own rom / kernel ondemand gov / no-op I/O scheduler no OC

Stock ROM will have higher runtime score because it's odexed.

Post your Antutu score!

Let's post our antutu score :victory:
CM11 M9
F4K 1.6 kernel
Itelliactive + fiops
no undervolting
Xposed active
F2FS file system
UC to 168mhz - 1728mhz
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Note: i had much higher scores about 20000 in the past somehow lol
my system feels quiet fast though lol

Got my phone yesterday, stock rom, stock kernel, stock everything.

@Aronuser What 15K for s4 mini. Antutu is drunk. Atleast on your phone. LOL
Anyway here is mine 21197. I had better results in past with same rom. upwards of 22K
Stock XXUCNF7 Deodexed 4.4.2
BriskV2 kernel.
No OC,UC,UV.
No mods.

My one with stock 4.2.2

Antutu is drunk. I had that behavior too sometimes 15 16k or 21 22k I don`t know what triggers it
My custom rom 4.4.2 PDA: I9192XXUCNG2
My custom kernel. No OC/OV, ondemand cpu governor , no-op I/O scheduler

Latest snapshot with default kernel:

Everything stock, heavy user of greenify + donation features, disable service and titanium backup to remove useless apps. Some governor values changed with trickster mod (ondemand governor: down differential 21, sampling down factor 10, sampling rate 10000 and up treshold 43).

All stock

All stock rom 4.2.2

With stock 4.2.2 I got 23000. With kitkat (stock 4.4.2 and cm11 4.4.4) around 21000. Is it normal that difference?
i9190 CM11 - Tapatalk 4.8.3

4.2.2 stock

with latest German dbt 4.4.2

MarcinRN said:
4.2.2 stock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow nice!!!

Humoxxx said:
wow nice!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4.2.2 has beter performance than kitkat on ours s4 mini. I have 23k too

MoKee 44.4-141009-RELEASE
Xposed and Greenify active
Interactive governor, raw I/O scheduler
No OC/UC

with CarbonRom KitKat

With stock,about 22k,with CM12(Without any apps installed besides Antutu,25k,with smartassv2,row)

GT-I9195. F4k CM12.1 with F4k kernel 2.3.0
CPU @ 1.7GHz Max, 162MHz min. GPU @ 600MHz.
Ran antutu and geekbench 3.

Sent from my GT-I9195 using XDA Free mobile app

sasank360 said:
GT-I9195. F4k CM12.1 with F4k kernel 2.3.0
CPU @ 1.7GHz Max, 162MHz min. GPU @ 600MHz.
Ran antutu and geekbench 3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which rom did u have before? How about battery life? (cm 12.1 vs old)
I have stock based 4.4.2 and before I had slimkat 4.4.4
what about xposed?