Database Users

Benchmarks General

Hi, I wanted to keep all benchmark scores/screenshots in one thread, so everyone can see which ROM seems to be the best in performance assets, which mods improve performance etc. Post your scores here.
Let's stay with following pattern, so it will be easier to read:
PHP:
[B]Benchmark:[/B] benchmark name you used
[B]ROM[/B]: Name + version
[B]Kernel[/B]:
[B]Mods applied (in order):[/B]
Name of mod+version if available,
2nd mod in next row, etc
[B]Score:[/B] <total score>
[B]Screenshot (if available):[/B]
Example:
Benchmark: AnTuTu
ROM: ILWT CM7 419
Kernel: ILWT CM7 Kernel 1.8.0
Mods applied (in order):
1. TweakzV6,
2. V6 SuperCharger U9RC8.2, default settings from calculator
3. OC: min 245MHz max 1574MHz ondemand, I/O Scheduler:sio
Score: 3600
Screenshot (if available):
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Benchmark: AnTuTu
ROM: Andromadus Audacity Beta4 pre-release
Kernel: stock (andromadus-ics-bfs-03)
Mods applied (in order):
1. V6 SuperCharger (AndroCharger) [link]
2. Virtuous OC Daemon [link]
3. OC: min 365MHz max 1612MHz smartassV2 (stock), I/O Scheduler: sio (stock)
Score: 4063
Screenshot:

ROM: XperiaSense 1.0
KERNEL: Unity V10
Mods Applied:
1)Supercharger
2)Swap
3) OC min 122MHz, Max 1459MHz Smartass
Score: 3499
Screenshot:
Sent from my Desire Z using XDA

ROM: andromadus beta3
KERNEL: stock
Mods
1)Supercharger (option 7)
2)Swap
3) OC min 368 Max 1516 smartassv2
Score: 3810
Screenshot:

Benchmark: AnTuTu
ROM: Android Revolution HD 7.04
Kernel: virtuous v10
Mods applied :
1. swap,
2. V6 SuperCharger U9RC8.2 option 6
3. OC: min 245MHz max 2016MHz ondemand
Score: 4013
screenshot:

Benchmark: AnTuTu
ROM: ILWT CM7 433 Kernel 1.8.0
Mods: OC/UV Beater min 245MHz max 1574 UV 75 all freqs
Score: 3785
Sent from my HTC Vision using xda premium

okey lets benchmark ! antutu and quadrant

Fun to see if there are any differens between roms.
Quadrant > 2245
Antutu > 5335
@1.2 ghz // gederom 1.45 kernal hashcode 3.0

GedeROM 1.45 OC'ed to 1.2 GHz, performance governor:
Quadrant: 4289
AnTuTu: 6027
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

4289? lol, faster than a Tegra 3? This is why I don't trust benchmarks.

Itaintrite said:
4289? lol, faster than a Tegra 3? This is why I don't trust benchmarks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hear ya, I don't trust them either but figured I'd post the results. I actually got a 4207 and 4309 also.

Running Hellfire CM7 without any overclocking:
Antutu: 5289
Quadrant: 2248

Quadrant: 2677
Antutu: 6085
gedeROM v1.45 @ 1.2GHZ

GedeROM v1.45 @ 1.2ghz Performance governor
Quadrant: 2668
AnTuTu: 6019

eeh ?
I have the same rom and kernel, so how can i get 5300 and you guys 6000> this is getting to my nervs.....
I allways do a factory reset and wipe dalvik and cash..... So what is wrong ?!?!?
When i come home i will try another rom to see the differens....
Can it be twarp ? or Firefirefire ? i Have old install of this......

skrewie said:
eeh ?
I have the same rom and kernel, so how can i get 5300 and you guys 6000> this is getting to my nervs.....
I allways do a factory reset and wipe dalvik and cash..... So what is wrong ?!?!?
When i come home i will try another rom to see the differens....
Can it be twarp ? or Firefirefire ? i Have old install of this......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is your governor set at? When doing benchmarks I set it to performance.

Hey
I change it, but now differens. Must i reboot for the guvenor to change ?
Edit.. I change the guvenor and reboot and got 5930 in Antutu, but only 2640 in Quadrant. How in earth can you get over 4000 ?!?!?!

OK, could please anyone put these result for the Stock Amazon ROM, so that there would be the stock to compare to?
In the meamntime my results:
Glazed ICS from 26-06-2012, 1200Mhz, Performance:
Antutu 6034
Quadrant 2635

rorogio said:
OK, could please anyone put these result for the Stock Amazon ROM, so that there would be the stock to compare to?
In the meamntime my results:
Glazed ICS, 1200Mhz, Performance:
Antutu 6034
Quadrant 2635
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Below 2000 in quadrant.
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?desktop_uri=/watch?v=bzZpXwqlhaE&v=bzZpXwqlhaE&gl=US
Sent from a thingymajig that sends things.

veeman said:
Below 2000 in quadrant.
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?desktop_uri=/watch?v=bzZpXwqlhaE&v=bzZpXwqlhaE&gl=US
Sent from a thingymajig that sends things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, thanks, and how about Antutu?...
I understand. I have to do it myself
Well, here it is:
KF stock ROM 6.3.1
Antutu tests: 5158, 5374, 5400, 5395, 5253, and a top of 5674!
All this with the deault CPU to 1008Mhz!
Quite impressive, but by far not as smooth as an ICS ROM...
Quadrant: 1996, 2015, and top of 2055
I suppose it only gets all the good points points because of the good SDcard driver, which is 2-3 times faster that the ICS, but this is not fery useful when all the programs you use are always moving slow on the screen.
So I go back to Glazed ICS now :victory: !
Cheers!

here's kindlelove roms scores. (my rom from hashes source.
sent from my new non bricked kindle

here's mine. SGT7 Linaro build (0625 iirc), 1.2GHz, perf gov.

[BENCHMARKS] Post Your Results

I am hereby Making a Benchmark thread for our U8800Pro.
According to me this results will help us decide what is the most fast and stable ROM till date.
So be free and post your benchmarks here.
Example:-
ROM used-ShenduOS-4.1.2-121228-Dev
Mods used-
*KickAssKernel script
*V6SuperCharger script(Zeppelinrox)
*Seeder Entropy 2.0
*Adrenaline Injector(by me)
CPU Frequency used-
1805Ghz
AnTuTu-
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Quadrant-
That was just an example you can use any of the two Softwares Antutu or quadrant as per your choice.
This is not for competition purposes
-Rik[Rittik]

keep in mind that benchmarks don't show real world performance.You can have a great score and the rom being buggy as hell at the same time..!

u 8800-51 divice with SheDu pro v2.0.4
CPU Frequency 1600, guvernator - ondemand
no lag no bug

the best antutu benckmark is mine with my rom, my benckmark is 6630 with 1804 mhz but i have not the screen because i do that benchkmark in the past

pointless thread.with all the respect.this is something like show me your homescreen to tell which rom is the best.

Highest benchmark does not mean faster or more stable ROM.
Sent from my U8800Pro using Tapatalk 2

I told stable.. Even 4.2.2 is stable but has many issues.. Stability doesnt depend upon bugs it depends on kernels(i may be wrong). Even b929 is unstable with Geno's earlier kernel multiple reboots..
There are roms which are stable but not fit for everyday use
-Rik[Rittik]

Baydu Yi 2.1

Hello, my result:
ROM used: CuvettoJB v 1.2
CPU Frequency used: 1805Ghz
Testing app AnTuTu.
Score: 6181
Sent from my U8800Pro using xda app-developers app

Sent from my U8800pro using Tapatalk 2

Hello, my result:
ROM used: CuvettoJB v 1.2
CPU Frequency used: 1405Ghz
Testing app AnTuTu.
Score: 5317
with SwapIt Expander I have almost no reboot at all (1-2 at week) :victory:

ROM 929 by Nikitines
SD 4Gb 6 Class
I/O !!!!!!

Antutu Benchmark i9195

Hey guys, here is my Antutu test of CyanogenMod11
I'm really proud of our device it's getting better with CyanogenMod11, better then XPERIA Z and Note 2.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Please post here your Antutu tests if better on stock rom or other roms!​

:laugh: :silly: :good: :fingers-crossed:

Sam Solomon said:
:laugh: :silly: :good: :fingers-crossed:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
20655 here... (CM11)

Tests does not matter much
My GT-I9192 S4 mini duos
My rom & kernel ( build for battery performance not high scores )

artu72 said:
20655 here... (CM11)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SilviuMik said:
Tests does not matter much
My GT-I9192 S4 mini duos
My rom & kernel ( build for battery performance not high scores )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah,Benchmark except Nenamark are all waste I just do for Show Off :victory: I'm new over here...My Old Device was scoring 8000+ only...
BTW My SS is from Stock BML2 ROM ..... I get 21,667 with CM11 .... But bad time...Phone got some weird touch issues

All the colorful bars are pretty, but TW still lags on my i9192, even with a different launcher.

Kernel: Amestris 2.7
Gouverneur: badass
Recovery: TWRP 2.7
Stock Rom: UBUBMK4
Cleaned Deodexed
Sent from my GT-I9192 using xda premium

I have the Highest Benchmark Score and Luckily my phone was the one who burnt inside out :highfive: Why Samsung..Why ?

Only 1470 on stock touch wiz, a sign to get another rom.

Stock Rom guys, no root, just stock, after 1 week of usage!!! What do you think?

post very interesting ! :angel: ==> http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=54580074&postcount=98

I think my S4 Mini is the best S4 Mini...LOL
Stock Deodexed Kitkat...rooted.
Anyway putting aside benchmarks my S4 Mini performs superbly. Real time performance is what matters and I have no issues as of now. Smooth UI, lag-free gaming and decent battery life with great network.

To make this all reliable: those of you running the stock firmware and rooted should run a test with and without disabling DVFS to proof the benchmark boost. And then it would be best to run a third test on CM but always with same settings, user app installs, etc.

20178 on CarbonROM build 20140727, no performance changes (384-1728MHz, interactive, row)

I9192 Duos KitKat
My own rom / kernel ondemand gov / no-op I/O scheduler no OC

Stock ROM will have higher runtime score because it's odexed.

Tangerine ≥10 - XSP versions affected by 1.4 GHZ bug vs. XSP versions free this bug

Tangerine ≥10 - XSP versions affected by 1.4 GHZ bug vs. XSP versions free this bug
I'm trying to narrow the source of the infamous 1.4 Ghz scale CPU issue. For those who are not experience this, I will explain: on Tangerine ≥10 kernel versions, the CPU won't scale over 1458 Mhz. It works just fine on stock kernel or Tangerine pre-version 10.
I've erased and format everything, even removed the SD-card, fresh install of CM 12.1 and a few custom ROM that were reported as working nice with T-Kernel ≥10... not a change, it won't go over 1.4 Ghz. I'm trying to figure out what's causing this wild behavior, it might be the device subversion. So, please post your Xperia SP version and what's your case - it's your Tangerine (versions ≥10) allows for CPU frequencies over 1458 Mhz? Thank you!
C5303 14W07 TYPE: PM-0350-BV NOT WORKING
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

varioventus said:
I'm trying to narrow the source of the infamous 1.4 Ghz scale CPU issue. For those who are not experience this, I will explain: on Tangerine ≥10 kernel versions, the CPU won't scale over 1458 Mhz. It works just fine on stock kernel or Tangerine pre-version 10.
I've erased and format everything, even removed the SD-card, fresh install of CM 12.1 and a few custom ROM that were reported as working nice with T-Kernel ≥10... not a change, it won't go over 1.4 Ghz. I'm trying to figure out what's causing this wild behavior, it might be the device subversion. So, please post your Xperia SP version and what's your case - it's your Tangerine (versions ≥10) allows for CPU frequencies over 1458 Mhz? Thank you!
C5303 14W07 TYPE: PM-0350-BV NOT WORKING
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's happening with me too

@varioventus this is an old thread but I want to write this anyway. The issue appears only when using the "clean L2 frequency table".
The difference between the label on your SP and mine (on which the issue doesn't exist) is that on the right side I see:
Model: C5303
14W18
SI: 1272-2536
There's something different in the hardware. It's the only explanation!