Official Reviews, Previews and Comparisons as they come thread. - Galaxy S III General

I wanted to make a thread that will collect all the reviews, previews and comparison articles and videos out there. I also want to do a good job at keeping the OP up to date as other OPs usually abandon their post. I will need everyone's help at making this thread work. Please follow my format and I will share your post in the OP. Also, tell me which section it belongs in.
1. PREVIEWS
A. GSM Arena's first preview: http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_unpacked_2012-review-756.php
Summary: GSM Arena gave a good first look at the phone. What is notable here is their benchmarks and how they compare to other smartphones.
B. GSM Arena's second preview:
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s_iii-review-757.php
Summary: Their second preview is much more in depth with lots of previews on how the camera and video recording work. They also share benchmarks and gestures + features that other phones do not currently have or use.
C. Mobile-Reviews Preview:
http://mobile-review.com/review/samsung-galaxy-s3-fl-en.shtml
Summary: Personally, the best preview in terms of images I have seen. They have a very good screen comparison between the SGS2, Note, SGS3 and HOX here. I highly recommend these preview shots. They also have an excellent comparison between the cameras of the SGS2 and SGS3.
D. AndroidNZ Preview:
http://www.androidnz.net/2012/05/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-androidnz-goes.html
http://www.androidnz.net/2011/09/sandisk-64gb-micro-sdxc-cards-confirmed.html
http://www.androidnz.net/2012/05/samsung-galaxy-s3-secrets-revealed.html
http://www.androidnz.net/2012/05/samsung-galaxy-s3-more-secrets-revealed.html
http://www.androidnz.net/2012/05/samsung-galaxy-s3-more-secrets-revealed.html
Summary: They show GPS lock on testing capabilities and confirm that exFAT works fine with the phone.
Thanks: NZtechfreak
E. Android Central complete warp up preview:
http://www.androidcentral.com/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-wrap
Summary: This links to multiple articles written about the Samsung Galaxy S III.
2. COMPARISONS
A. Samsung Galaxy S 3 and HTC One X from GSM Arena:
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s_iii_vs_htc_one_x-review-759.php
Summary: They cover every part of the phone here. Introduction, Hardware, Software, Camera, Video, Benchmark. You name it.
B. Samsung Galaxy S 3 and HTC One X from PhoneArena:
http://www.phonearena.com/reviews/Samsung-Galaxy-S-III-vs-HTC-One-X_id3034
Summary: They pretty much cover the same topics as GSM Arena did. They take different photographs. Feel free to take a look.
C. Samsung Galaxy S 3 and Samsung Galaxy S 2 from PhoneArena:
http://www.phonearena.com/reviews/Samsung-Galaxy-S-III-vs-Samsung-Galaxy-S-II_id3037
Summary: Similar to above but with the SGS2.
D. Samsung Galaxy S 3 and iPhone 4S from PhoneArena:
http://www.phonearena.com/reviews/Samsung-Galaxy-S-III-vs-Apple-iPhone-4S_id3038
Summary: Similar to above but with the iPhone4S.
3. REVIEWS
A. PhoneArena review:
http://www.phonearena.com/reviews/Samsung-Galaxy-S-III-Review_id3031
Summary: Not much more than all the previews they have done. Here they just give their strong and concrete opinions on the phone and their final verdict.
B. DroidSans review:
Summary: He pretty much gives a open box review and summarizes the phone. near the end he shows off the phone playing games and playing movies at the same time. He also goes over the voice unlock commands which can be customized for an app, Very awesome. Recommended.
C. Review from Android Suomi translated from Finland to English.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1662884
D. GSMArena Full Review:
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9300_galaxy_s_iii-review-761.php
Summary: Not too different from their previews but still very detailed. They have even more from their preview like audio test, and much more in depth with the features.
Thanks: Rocketpaul
E. CNET UK Review
http://reviews.cnet.co.uk/mobile-phones/samsung-galaxy-s3-review-50006020/?tag=mncol;txt
Summary: Not much more than what we have seen in other reviews above. Notable is that the phone gets a Editor's choice award and a 4.5/5 stars.
Thanks: rapaholic999
F. Stuff Full Review:
http://www.stuff.tv/review/samsung-galaxy-s3
Summary: Stuff.tv full review of the Galaxy S3. Battery life test shows it as double that of the HTC One X.
Thanks: MaskedMagi
G. Tech Radar Review:
http://www.techradar.com/reviews/phones/mobile-phones/samsung-galaxy-s3-1078667/review
Summary: A review with more than 17 pages of content!
Thanks: jaju123
H. The Verge Review:
http://www.theverge.com/2012/5/25/3042640/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-review
Summary: They do their own camera test and nice screen shots of software but their performance benchmarks don't really match up with other ones I have seen. I think they got the Antutu numbers mixed up for the SGS3 and Tegra 3. This is a real shame on the reviewer.
Thanks: VJKotts
I. Engadget Review:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/25/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-review/
Summary: Just a more detailed review than their preview. More opinions and concrete detail. One thing Engadget fails to bring up is that the VYSNC for the SGS3 doesn't allow it to go past 60 FPS in some benchmarks. Therefore Nenmark is useless for comparison.
Thanks: mrvirginia
J. Slashgear Review:
http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-review-27230300/
Thanks: rapaholic999
K. Android Authority Review:
http://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-galaxy-s3-review-video-89883/
Thanks: DocRambone
L. HDBlog Review (Italian, use google translate):
http://samsung.hdblog.it/2012/05/29/samsung-galaxy-s3-recensione-completa-by-hdblog/
Thanks: hot_spare
M. Theinquirer.net Review:
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/review/2181733/samsung-galaxy-s3-review
Thanks: omersak
N. AndroidNZ review:
http://www.androidnz.net/2012/06/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-real-user-review.html
Thanks: NZtechfreak
O. Android Central Review:
http://www.androidcentral.com/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-review
Thanks: rapaholic999
P. Geektech Review
http://geektech.ie/index.php/review-samsung-galaxy-siii/
Thanks: Thor
4. MISC
A. Battery test by GSMArena:
http://blog.gsmarena.com/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-battery-test-is-ready-does-very-well/
Summary: GSM Arena performs their own battery test and compares them to other phones of the SGS3.
B. Swedroid abusing the SGS3 to test fluidness and response times.
Summary: The SGS3's response time is test by fast usage.
Thanks: zyryn
C. Mobile-Review Battery test
http://www.mobile-review.com/review/samsung-galaxy-s3-battery-en.shtml
Summary: Mobile-Review goes through their own battery test of the SGS3. Results are close to similar of GSM Arena was almost 10 hours max of video playback in airplane mode. Show off power savor mode difference.
POWER SAVOR
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
WITHOUT POWER SAVOR
Thanks: ale0crysis
D. Unboxing and previews
Thanks: istoica
E. More battery test by Android HD Blog (Italian):
http://android.hdblog.it/2012/05/25/galaxy-s3-test-live-durata-batteria-by-hdblog-inizio-ore-10/
Thanks: TMaLuST

Don't forget AndroidNZ
Hands-on write up: http://www.androidnz.net/2012/05/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-androidnz-goes.html
exFAT confirmation: http://www.androidnz.net/2011/09/sandisk-64gb-micro-sdxc-cards-confirmed.html
First information on a few features no one else has really publicised:
http://www.androidnz.net/2012/05/samsung-galaxy-s3-secrets-revealed.html
http://www.androidnz.net/2012/05/samsung-galaxy-s3-more-secrets-revealed.html

NZtechfreak said:
Don't forget AndroidNZ
Hands-on write up: http://www.androidnz.net/2012/05/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-androidnz-goes.html
exFAT confirmation: http://www.androidnz.net/2011/09/sandisk-64gb-micro-sdxc-cards-confirmed.html
First information on a few features no one else has really publicised:
http://www.androidnz.net/2012/05/samsung-galaxy-s3-secrets-revealed.html
http://www.androidnz.net/2012/05/samsung-galaxy-s3-more-secrets-revealed.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Added.

Review from Finland added as well.

Added Android Central's warp up preview.

gsmarenas review is out!http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9300_galaxy_s_iii-review-761.php

Thanks, good collection to read reviews and get excited while waiting

Man, this is awesome!
"FM Radio
The Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III is equipped with an FM radio with RDS too. The interface is simple - there's a tuning dial and you can save as many as 8 stations as favorites. You can also listen on the loudspeaker, but the headset is still needed as it acts as the antenna. You can record radio broadcasts as well."

SlimJ87D said:
Man, this is awesome!
"FM Radio
The Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III is equipped with an FM radio with RDS too. The interface is simple - there's a tuning dial and you can save as many as 8 stations as favorites. You can also listen on the loudspeaker, but the headset is still needed as it acts as the antenna. You can record radio broadcasts as well."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
all galaxy s series had this feature

bala_gamer said:
all galaxy s series had this feature
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't know you could record though. Sadly my captivate doesn't... for some reason US variants got gimped when it came to the FM radio.

bala_gamer said:
all galaxy s series had this feature
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not true. My Cappy doesn't have the hardware for it, so no go. Not that I'd ever use the feature.
Herp derp Captivate XDA Premium App.

pizz0wn3d said:
Not true. My Cappy doesn't have the hardware for it, so no go. Not that I'd ever use the feature.
Herp derp Captivate XDA Premium App.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? You never thought about recording a song you like?
Sent from my HTC One X using XDA

pizz0wn3d said:
Not true. My Cappy doesn't have the hardware for it, so no go. Not that I'd ever use the feature.
Herp derp Captivate XDA Premium App.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh , my bad, i didnt thought of that .

Jut finished reading the gsmarena review. I hope -
1. S4 version is still as fast (which I think it will be based on benchmarks)
2. US carriers don't remove the awesome features - this one I'm worried about.

ECrispy said:
Jut finished reading the gsmarena review. I hope -
1. S4 version is still as fast (which I think it will be based on benchmarks)
2. US carriers don't remove the awesome features - this one I'm worried about.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Knowing the US carriers, specially ATT, they will probably remove something. Like the FM Radio will be disabled. They have to do something to make the phone stay around the same price range with the LTE radio in there. Or maybe I'm wrong, maybe the Exynos cost just as much as an S4 with LTE but probably not since Samsung manufactures their own SoC.
I only had a SGS2 Skyrocket for a few days. Anyone know if that was gimped in anyway?

Disabling features costs more than leaving them enabled. Most of the time they disable it so they can push their own bloatware instead.

ECrispy said:
Disabling features costs more than leaving them enabled. Most of the time they disable it so they can push their own bloatware instead.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends how the feature is disabled. Like taking out a fm radio all together to cut cost etc.
Sent from my HTC One X using XDA

Usually its all disabled in software. There are probably only 2 reference designs for the GS3 - S4 for LTE markets and Exonys for everyone else.
The chipsets used in these are fixed, and any changes are done at the firmware level. e.g. to disable FM/NFC etc, they don't modify the circuit design as that would cost a lot more and require separate assembly/QA.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbfmkATGyrQ
please add this , swedroid vid showing ui fluidity

ECrispy said:
Usually its all disabled in software. There are probably only 2 reference designs for the GS3 - S4 for LTE markets and Exonys for everyone else.
The chipsets used in these are fixed, and any changes are done at the firmware level. e.g. to disable FM/NFC etc, they don't modify the circuit design as that would cost a lot more and require separate assembly/QA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't believe so, it's not that difficult. Over here when we design circuit cards etc, they are designed to leave certain features out for the military displays, etc. It's as simple as just excluding things in the BOM and making variant drawing. Doesn't cost us anymore then it does save the customer money.
I don't know exactly how Samsung is, I just know how the places I have worked at are. So I'm not going to say for certain how Qualcom and Samsung documented and prepared their SoCs.
zyryn said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbfmkATGyrQ
please add this , swedroid vid showing ui fluidity
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Added, thank you.

Related

[SGS 3] Discuss everything SGS 3 related here[Pictures,Specs N benchmark in thread]

Galaxy s3 is out!
Discuss everything sg3 related in this thread.
Info:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/03/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-preview-hands-on/
Performance:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5810/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-performance-preview
Specs:
http://goo.gl/F7j9p
Code:
Dimensions: 136.6 x 70.6 x 8.6mm
Wight: 133 grams
Display: 4.8-inch HD Super AMOLED (1280×720) ; Pentile (no Plus);
Processor: Exynos 4 Quad @ 1.4Ghz for HSPA version
Rear Camera: 8MP Autofocus, Flash, Zero Lag Shutter BSI Image sensor
Front Camera: 1.9 MP HD, Flash, Zero Lag Shutter
Video: Full HD 1080p Recording and Playback
Storage: 16GB/32GB/64GB
Battery: 2,100mAh
Connectivity: GPS with GLONASS
Networking: 802.11n Wi-Fi, NFC, Bluetooth 4
Storage: Available in 16/32/64GB and supports microSD expansion
Other: 21Mbps HSPA, LTE supported and Micro SIM
Operating System: Android 4.0.4
GALAXY SIII UNPACKED:
Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W33NPDutOcw
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43qbwoHyCos
Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnNkZyX7P7s
Part 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZXpZELOWTY
Part 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bs62tfQs9SE
Talk about first impressions:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gu8t4ahRtrg&feature=uploademail
SGS3 vs One X vs Galaxy Nexus vs SGS2:
http://goo.gl/F6ksQ
SGS3 Vs One X (more info):
http://goo.gl/A1l59
No fights, like HTC is better than Samsung.. You can for instance, discuss One X vs Sgs3, but stay on-topic and don't end up in a fight.
This thread will be watched
I personally think it looks great. The small little features like wireless charging, a buzz if missed calls sound genius. Most people are overlooking these and looking straight at the stats. It's a great phone.
Sent from my Galaxy S running Slim ICS 3.5 and Midnight kernel from my XDA Premium app.
great features and specs, but i think it is totally hideous. It got killed by the home button being odly shaped and the corners start to round before the top of the screen. Just my opinion though, its stilla nice phone
I like the Smart Stay, Android 4.0.4 and ICS-y TouchWiz (now we know why SGS2 get Gingerbread-y TouchWiz).
It isn't near as bad as many people are making it seem. It's just because of how big of a deal Samsung made it that makes it more of a let down. If this was just announced normally at an event like MWC then people wouldn't be having that big of an issue. It's just how it got over hyped with Samsung sending it out to be tested in secret boxes, no leaks for anything at all, it's own big press conference, etc. It was sickening reading in the One X section with all their biased opinions on a phone they've never even seen or tried first person. Give it a chance.
Features look neat, design is terrible.
Sent from my HTC Flyer P510e using xda premium
mcord11758 said:
Features look neat, design is terrible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Really, nice specs but it's hideous.
I gotta admit, It's a bit of a letdown. It looks a bit goofy but I have the feeling that a proper first hand hands on will turn my opinion around again, they are going for function over form with this one I guess. Also It has a pentile screen but seeing from videos and hearing description of reviewers is not enough to judge this category. Overall, I think the hate from many place will die down once it is released just like iPhone 4S, people are shouting, mocking, and taunting because it's only an iteration but suddenly no one is hating it anymore.
Specs great
Design Disappointing
Sent from my Legend using xda premium
furt890 said:
I gotta admit, It's a bit of a letdown. It looks a bit goofy but I have the feeling that a proper first hand hands on will turn my opinion around again, they are going for function over form with this one I guess. Also It has a pentile screen but seeing from videos and hearing description of reviewers is not enough to judge this category. Overall, I think the hate from many place will die down once it is released just like iPhone 4S, people are shouting, mocking, and taunting because it's only an iteration but suddenly no one is hating it anymore.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's because no-one cares for the iPhone. They get what Apple gives them. Period. Android users do have a choice and over-hyped products that look like something blue and ugly crawled from the sea, made sex with a pebble and then gave birth to this thing, rarely stand a chance. It will still sell but won't be the success S2 was.
I really thought Samsung would put something nice on the table this time. Now I know why they didn't show it on MWC. Side by side with the HOX it would be a media disaster for them.
And all the fun we have with it at the HOX forum, is because the Samsung fanboys who never owned a HOX were saying for the past month "S3 will blow it out of the water" and now we saw what they meant. Noone wants to be in the same ocean with something as ugly as this thing. In a year and a half *maybe* there will be some apps that will run slightly better on the S3, but it will still be as ugly as it is today with the same ugly pentile screen.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Cant go wrong with sammy.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium
Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W33NPDutOcw
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43qbwoHyCos
Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnNkZyX7P7s
Part 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZXpZELOWTY
Part 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bs62tfQs9SE
The New Samsung GALAXY SIII A GALAXY Unpacked 2012 Video LiveStream
Enjoy
Galaxy S III vs. HTC One X
I wanna take this time to give a fair comparison of the Galaxy S III to HTC's flagship One X. Let me start by saying I am not a fanboy for any brand. I like any device that works, and works well. I choose my devices based on build quality, specs, and features. Software is never a dealbreaker for me, as I usually prefer to load custom ROM's (CM/AOSP mostly). That said, I must say I am quite impressed with the Galaxy S III so far.
In my own honest opinion (and without starting any fights), I felt like the original Galaxy S and even the GS2 were way overhyped. Yes, I agree that they are good devices, but I feel like they didn't really scream out "next gen" when they launched. With the specs on paper and even in real world benchmarks, the first 2 generations only just gave their Nexus counterparts a run for their money. At first glance, it looks like the GS3 is finally going to push the bar to the next level. Of course, HTC also has it's high-end contenders, and this time around it happens to be the One X.
Now, I am in the market for a new phone, and I was highly considering the One X. With all the hype leading up to the GS3, I thought about the previous two generations, and prematurely decided the third gen would end up like the first two. Well, I stand corrected. I could easily see myself buying a GS3, but I am still undecided. On one hand, I have always loved HTC's build quality, and the One X's features definitely fits my requirements. But on the other hand, the Galaxy S III has a few things HTC missed.
When it comes to raw horsepower, both devices are definitely packing a lot of power, so that leaves other things to consider. While I have yet to actually handle each phone in my own hands, my first impression about build quality would go to HTC's polycarbonate unibody design. I always prefer a body not made of plastic, but then again, the Gorilla Glass 2 on Samsung's flagship does give it an upper hand. So all in all, it's still a tie.
When it comes to the camera, HTC definitely wins here. Sure, both devices are 8MP, but as a photographer, I know that the lens makes all the difference. The HTC One X has a beautiful wide angle lens with f/2.0, and from what I've read, Samsung put more effort into the software, leaving it with just an average lens at best. HTC also spent a lot time perfecting their camera software, so they get bonus points for paying attention to all the small details.
Two other important factors for me are the ability to remove the battery and add an external microSD. Unfortunately, this is where HTC made their mistakes, and Samsung was right there to make it right. These are actually two of the biggest things that are giving me second thoughts about buying the One X, and opting for the GS3 instead.
But then I start thinking about the screen. Quality is more important to me than size, and while Samsung's may be a tenth of an inch bigger, it appears that HTC's Super IPS LCD2 wins here. Not to say Samsung's screen isn't good, but I was a bit surprised to see they forgot the Plus part of their HD Super AMOLED. Maybe they did this to leave some room for improvement when another variant of the GS3 comes out in the next 3-4 months. Who knows...
Other than a few other minor differences that could go either way, one final important feature is the battery itself. We all know smartphones are power hungry, so it goes without saying that Samsung's removable 2100mAh gives it an upper edge. Hopefully, it's enough to keep the phone charged for at least a couple of days. HTC's 1800mAh may also last a couple days, partially thanks to the Tegra 3's fifth power-saving core. But when it comes right down to it, 2100mAh simply sounds better. And did I mention it's removable?
This leaves me stuck with a hard decision to make. I'm sure I'll be happy either way, but in both cases, there will be some sacrifices to make, yet there will always be the satisfaction of having a powerful device nonetheless. You win some, you lose some.
I'm also considering a new tablet as well, so if only the Asus Padfone would come out. That would make this decision even harder!
I wish I had enough money to buy both
Love it
Gonna buy it !
Thats all i have to say!!
Best regards !
Awesome specs, design ain't so good. But for christ sake, what a hell of a specs.
I'd give my someone's left nut to have it
Presterin said:
mcord11758 said:
Features look neat, design is terrible.
Sent from my HTC Flyer P510e using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Really, nice specs but it's hideous.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+2!
Had the original SGS and was originally holding out for the SGS3, and opted to go the HOX when it came out given the specs and couldn't be bothered waiting for the SGS3, and timing with my contract coming up for renewal.
S-Voice - Interested there's finally competition to Siri, but something I wouldn't use anyway.
Wireless Charging - Slow and a novelty.
Vibrate when pick up phone for notifications - Very neat, but if I'm picking up my phone, 9/10 I'll be looking at it anyway
Eye-focus thing - Very neat, only big feature I would quite like.
Now so glad I didn't wait around for it.
Samsung Galaxy S III Full HD PSD Vector
Last work of my Design Factory :
5 diferents Samsung Galaxy S III Full HD PSD Vectors available at http://tinyurl.com/cdl79nh
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Proud to have made the very first Samsung Galaxy S III Full HD PSD Vector available in the web !!!
Perfect for your screenshots on this beauty
Happy theming !
I guess all those leaked fake sgs 3 pics raised my hopes too high
Sent from my Legend using xda premium

[MINI REVIEW] Xperia x8

This thread has been created to review the Xperia x8 device. As I say in all my reviews, although there may be other threads reviewing the device, I think it is valid that I give tips based on my experience. This is a Mini guide which means that I will only highlight key information about the phone.
Suggestions are like gold to me and I just want to make my service better. All reasonable comments are welcome. Please PM me if you have any urgent problems. I am sorry if my service is uninvited.​ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Xperia x8 burst into stores around September 2010 worldwide. After using the phone for nearly a year, I can confirm that it is a great phone for both advanced android users and basic ones. I hope to elaborate on the ultimate phone formula used in the device. I will cover a few specific areas.
The device is renowned for its 3G capabilities was developed by the late Sony Ericsson shipped with the Android 1.6 architecture and officially upgradable to the newer 2.1 version. XDA has enabled many ways of surpassing this firmware limit and expanding your experience.
Physical Hardware
You can probably guess that the phone will not have the latest hardware if it was created two years ago and this is why I thought I would highlight the now weakest point first.
The phone has a 76 mm powerfully capacitive touch screen LCD. It has a small yet firm resolution of 320 by 480 pixels. On the back of the device is a 3.2 megapixel camera with fixed focus and no flash and there is no front facing camera. Photos can be geotagged although this feature is not necessarily useful. Fortunately camera can be accessed using the touchscreen menu, or via the dedicated camera button on the side of the phone. The Xperia X8 uses a 600 MHz Qualcomm MSM7227 processor, as well as 3-axis accelerometers and built-in Global Positioning System. It also has a an ambient light sensor and a digital compass. The Xperia also sports a 1200mAh which was quite an improvement to its predecessor the x10 mini.
Although not initially available, Multi-touch support was also added to several aftermarket firmware versions (ROMS) cough* nAa* cough MiniCM9 cough* .
Like nearly every device, in its day, the x8 attracted many people simply because of mid-range cost effectivity
Physical Appearance
The Xperia line of mobile phones has always amazed critics with its design being second to none. This fact is what led many to believe the next Nexus phone/s will be designed by the same art team. The phone has a curved back with quite a boxed like front. Combining the generic phone look with a rather futuristic design gives the cellular device an original overall look. On purchasing the phone you are provided with two different coloured backs (varies depending on carrier and country).
User Friendliness
As mentioned previously, the mobile comes shipped with android 1.6 upgradable to 2.1. I can only comment on the 2.1 software seeing as this is the only one I have used.
Sony Ericson paid large amounts of attention to detail and although many users are against developers overhauling android, I believe this was a necessary step as the stock firmware runs flawlessly on the device and SE adds many feature that will make tasks which many believe common easier. I did feel that this generation of phones marked the death of Pay as you Go as many features are internet reliant and internet is impossible on P&G. In addition to this, the raw support for the phone gives advanced users satisfaction too. Not only does XDA support customization but SE does too! More phone developers should take a leaf out of Sony Ericson's book and offer support like they do.
Cost Efficiency
Nowadays, the price of android products seems to depreciate considerably faster than other rivals. This is to be expected seeing as the mobile phone market itself is considerably saturated and with more android variants entering each day cost/unit depreciation will be far greater than the iPhone branding. The phone has become a mid range low cost phone. I would say for a price as low as £80 in the UK, nearly all users will be appeased. The phone teaches users who were not particularly advanced, many things about android. Something the spoon feeding of iOS will never do.
Conclusion
The Xperia x8 is a great low cost phone for beginners to android as well as advanced users. The hardware is acceptable however people will become thirsty for more in this current day and age. Stunning visuals means that you will not be embarrassed in front of your friends and firmware is never an issue. Pay as you go may have been abandoned for the time being but seems to be getting adopted by Google with their latest jelly bean. With the Sony Ericson department no closed, phones like this just won't be produced anymore. Sony are still finding their feet but I think they are going in the HTC direction producing too many phones at once. If phone manufacturers worked upon the fundamentals like SE did, we would have the new breed of ultimate phones.
RATING: I give this phone a 7 jelly beans out of 10. I would nominate this phone as LCTOTY. (Low cost thing of the year) Actually it is a tie between this and toilet paper. :cyclops:
Thankyou for reading my review.
NOTE: Sometimes I find myself on XDA in the early hours of the morning providing the best possible. I sometimes do not pay attention and will get angry quickly. I never mean any disrespect to anyone. If I do cross the line I am sorry in advance. Please PM me and bring my comment to my attention. I will issue an apology ASAP. Even though many advanced XDA users have disappointed me I will always offer XDA the best. I am always trying to be as nice as possible regardless of what people do to anger me so feel free to ask for help with anything.
Sources
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Ericsson_Xperia_X8
Special Thanks to my good friend KidCarter93. Structural duplication rights are shared with him.
Special Thanks also to mf2112 for all his support. ​
Special Mention to IAmNice, lucastan96, SpyderX and RohinZaraki. Without them the x8 community would be a darker place. ​
Lol. Nice review. Couldn't have said it better myself. You're on a roll my man. :thumbup:
sent from my rooted tomato using xda app
Wow this made me very proud of my x8
Just sent
It's RohinZaraki not RohinZakari..
Sent from my Xperia™ X8
nazz.rule said:
It's RohinZaraki not RohinZakari..
Sent from my Xperia™ X8
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL!
Vınce said:
LOL!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi vince,
I wonder what do you want to say with your comment?
@OP
Why change userid?
nice thread, thanks now I know Im using
That's a wonderful guide, thanks guy
Sent from my E15i using xda premium
I would nominate this phone as LCTOTY. (Low cost thing of the year) Actually it is a tie between this and toilet paper.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't stop laughing at this! :laugh:
nazz.rule said:
It's RohinZaraki not RohinZakari..
Sent from my Xperia™ X8
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Changed. I was typing from memory. Sorry for any problems caused by that.
Also, many thanks to all commenters. Made my day after coming straight back from Basket Ball practice. Especially
deedii and fifo171
Vince said:
LOL!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Goodnight Much Love
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Nice ROM though
Nice review, you sure have a way with words but noo way was the x8 the S3 of its day. It was a low-mid spec phone even then. The S1 was the S3 of its day.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium

First impresions

While still waiting for my note to arrive i would love to hear from anyone who has recieved theres what they think so far and what featured aere the best if not all....i hate waiting but reading peoples veiws will do for now thx
I take it not alot of people got there phone then
Just Got mine yesterday. Uograded from note 1 gtn7000.. one word. Gnote 2 is awesome. So butery smooth! Better display also colors are much deeper. Battery life the best. All I can say is it is a very good choice. Benchmark awesome also. Killed iphone 5 on geekbench
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Does it have the multi-window feature seen on the Korean version?
Love all this fore play reviews hope mine turns up monday thx
Strategist said:
Does it have the multi-window feature seen on the Korean version?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good question, id like to know that too...
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
Is there a piece of paper with official specifications? Can someone take a picture of it and post so we can finally see what cell bands it has?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA Premium HD app
PierreTech said:
Just Got mine yesterday. Uograded from note 1 gtn7000.. one word. Gnote 2 is awesome. So butery smooth! Better display also colors are much deeper. Battery life the best. All I can say is it is a very good choice. Benchmark awesome also. Killed iphone 5 on geekbench
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you notice any black crush on dark scenes when you play videos on your note? how about screen tint on low and high brightness. does the note suffer from tint issues like the s3
Black clipping you mean?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
PierreTech said:
Black clipping you mean?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure what the difference is between black clipping and black crush, all i knw is that on my s3 when i view most videos with the exception of extremely high quality blu-ray rips, dark scenes appear to loose detail, as if the black become blocky almost like they are not rendering correctly. however bright scenes in daylight or well lit rooms tend to display fine. i was just wondering if the note 2 has solved these problems.
its a very common issues on super amoled hd
I couldn't find it on mine (GT-N7100, ordered from Expansys Austria, shipped from Marseille). I could'nt also find any hint in the englisch manual I downloaded from the Samsung Hongkong Site. I read in a short review that a long press on the back key should bring up the multiview side tab. It definitely doesn't on mine.
Beside the little less text on webpages (which doesn't disturb my surfing experience) I couldn't find a thing that is not better than on the N1.
Strategist said:
Does it have the multi-window feature seen on the Korean version?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The plus points for me:
- The screen - brighter, crisper, by far better test result with the black clipping image presented on XDA, good outside visibility. Better automatic brightness handling as far as I'm concerned.
- The pen - oval, so that you can't miss the button side, thicker, longer, riffled button, smooth on the screen
- The battery - I used mine a lot during the day (as it is when you test a new gadget ) and I'm on 28% battery. Very impressed.
- The notification led in different colors.
- The speaker (clearer, more bass)
- Air View works much better than on the promo videos. Practicable and fun.
- Camera with a faster shutter and a lot of bells and whistles.
- Speed of the device - it's just fun to use it.
- Slightly better positioning of volume keys and power key - didn't press the power key by accident so far.
- of course a lot of software improvements but that may come to the N1 too.
Hmm pity about the missing multi-window feature. It looks really cool in that Korean promo video. I would guess it will come in a future update though. There is no reason to make it a Korean exclusive.
Otherwise great to see that you are enjoying the phone. Personally I was impressed with it right from the start but I remember there was a feeling of disappointment among some posters at the announcement. I think a lot of it was because of the slightly lower resolution on the screen. Also it wasn't quite clear at the time that the Note 2 uses RGB instead of Pentile. Anyway clearly the Note 2's screen is great which, combined with all the other upgrades, makes it a worthy successor to a great phone.
Someone needs to get a dump of the korean ROM and make if flashable on the N7000 Note ASAP!!!!!
That is such a killer feature to not have!
- Frank
Whats the multi window feature? I must had missed it
Daps said:
Whats the multi window feature? I must had missed it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1908092
Strategist said:
Hmm pity about the missing multi-window feature. It looks really cool in that Korean promo video. I would guess it will come in a future update though. There is no reason to make it a Korean exclusive.
Otherwise great to see that you are enjoying the phone. Personally I was impressed with it right from the start but I remember there was a feeling of disappointment among some posters at the announcement. I think a lot of it was because of the slightly lower resolution on the screen. Also it wasn't quite clear at the time that the Note 2 uses RGB instead of Pentile. Anyway clearly the Note 2's screen is great which, combined with all the other upgrades, makes it a worthy successor to a great phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Believe me, the Note 2 has so much AI built-in (smart stay, smart rotate, mouse hover, multi windows....i can go on all day) that it makes me realize the name "smartphone" is suddenly an apt one for the device. The quad core + 2GB RAM + full rgb amoled screen yield an experience much like using a laptop so please dont listen to the ones who do not have the device yet and start comparing it to iphone5 out of boredom...doing that is like comparing the note 2 to a 1985 Motorola first generation phone.
Also for the first time I have absolutely no desire to put any custom roms on the phone....the firmware on the note 2 as it is now is an absolute triumph....I cant imagine why anyone would load crap made from the bedroom of some hairless nerd when you have a platform produced by hundreds of professional engineers that went through proper QA
eRode said:
Also for the first time I have absolutely no desire to put any custom roms on the phone....the firmware on the note 2 as it is now is an absolute triumph....I cant imagine why anyone would load crap made from the bedroom of some hairless nerd when you have a platform produced by hundreds of professional engineers that went through proper QA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You may change your mind about that when you find out your current rom doesn't support multi-windows.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
eRode said:
I cant imagine why anyone would load crap made from the bedroom of some hairless nerd when you have a platform produced by hundreds of professional engineers that went through proper QA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because historically, that 'crap' has been better than what the engineers put out?
If custom roms weren't better, each in their own ways, then nobody would use them.
- Frank
I find this multiview issue to be weird. Cuz on the Swedish Note 2 manual that is the same as any N7100 it clearly states that multiview is available and how to activate it.
I saw a Swedish video of it with 4G obviously N7105 and sue enough. Multiview was shown.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Yup. It clearly states that "this function might not be available for your region or depending on carrier brand"

Xperia z reviews

I thought it would be nice to collect de reviews in one topic
As requested, a list of all reviews, thanks to everyone that contributed.
http://www.stuff.tv/review/sony-xperia-z
http://www.techgoondu.com/2013/02/10/goondu-review-sony-xperia-z/
http://blog.clove.co.uk/2013/01/18/sony-xperia-z-review/
http://unleashthephones.com/2013/02/10/sony-xperia-z-review/
http://www.01net.com/fiche-produit/essentiel-13823/sony-xperia-z (french)
http://www.frandroid.com/test/128142_sony-xperia-z-test-smartphone-android/ (french)
http://www.cnetfrance.fr/produits/sony-xperia-z-le-test-39786008.htm (french)
http://www.phonearena.com/reviews/Sony-Xperia-Z-Review_id3247
http://www.eprice.com.tw/mobile/talk/4551/4853305/1/rv/htc-butterfly-蝴蝶機, J Butterfly-review#ystfuv (vs butterfly Chinese)
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?featur...ch?v=ZHuj_jGdwio&feature=youtube_gdata_player (Czech)
http://hi-tech.mail.ru/review/misc/Sony_Xperia_Z-rev.html (Russian)
http://m.t3.com/reviews/sony-xperia-z-review
http://reviews.cnet.co.uk/mobile-phones/sony-xperia-z-review-50010121/
http://chinese.engadget.com/2013/02/14/sony-xperia-z-review/ (Chinese)
http://es.engadget.com/2013/02/15/sony-xperia-z-analisis/ (Spanish)
http://www.chip.de/artikel/Sony-Xperia_Z-Handy-Test_60388362.html (German)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=PQKJqTSfl3U
http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_xperia_z-review-887p11.php
http://asia.cnet.com/product/sony-xperia-z-46728620.htm
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-s...ne/3419374/sony-xperia-z-review/-8499991.html
http://www.journaldugeek.com/2013/02/18/test-sony-xperia-z/ (french)
http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/20/sony-xperia-z-review/
http://www.v3.co.uk/v3-uk/review/2249282/sony-xperia-z-review
http://www.techradar.com/reviews/phones/mobile-phones/sony-xperia-z-1119637/review
http://www.pcwelt.de/produkte/Smartp...t-7471704.html (German)
http://www.expertreviews.co.uk/smartphones/1298053/sony-xperia-z
http://www.brighthand.com/default.asp?newsID=19801&news=Sony+Xperia+Z+Review
http://tweakers.net/reviews/2915/sony-xperia-z-de-eerste-full-hd-smartphone-voor-nederland.html (dutch)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=xigKO8Q3SQY
http://www.slashgear.com/sony-xperia-z-review-24270827/
http://www.knowyourmobile.com/blog/1819952/sony_xperia_z_review.html
http://ausdroid.net/2013/02/25/xperia-z-review/
http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/02/sony-xperia-z-review/
http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/videos/3428481/sony-xperia-z-review/
http://www.pocket-lint.com/review/6179/sony-xperia-z-review
http://www.whathifi.com/review/sony-xperia-z
http://www.wired.co.uk/reviews/mobile-phones/2013-02/sony-xperia-z-review
http://en.ocworkbench.com/feature/review-of-the-sony-xperia-z-5-jellybean-smartphone/
http://technozein.pathfinder.gr/Sony-Xperia-Z (Greek)
http://www.dialaphone.co.uk/blog/2013/02/28/htc-one-review-this-is-the-one/
http://www.littlegreenrobot.co.uk/phones/sony-xperia-z-review/
http://www.hardwareluxx.com/index.p...y-xperia-z-part-12-the-fullhd-smartphone.html (part 1)
http://www.hardwareluxx.com/index.p...gadgets/21876-test-sony-xperia-z-part-22.html (part 2)
http://www.coolsmartphone.com/2013/02/28/sony-xperia-z-review/
http://geektech.ie/index.php/review-sony-xperia-z
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2013/03/sony-xperia-z-australian-review-the-magic-is-back-at-sony/
http://www.thinkdigit.com/Mobiles-PDAs/Sony-Xperia-Z-Review_13794.html (text)
http://www.thinkdigit.com/Mobiles-PDAs/Sony-Xperia-Z-Video-Review_13762.html (video)
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...cks-a-powerful-punch/articleshow/18830674.cms
http://www.knowyourmobile.com/sony/sony-xperia-z/19661/sony-xperia-z-review-living-test
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/smartphones/380371/sony-xperia-z
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tech/news/a464298/sony-xperia-z-review-waterproof-wonder.html
http://www.androidauthority.com/sony-xperia-z-review-video-167792/
http://www.intomobile.com/reviews/sony-xperia-z-review/
http://www.trustedreviews.com/sony-xperia-z_Mobile-Phone_review
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5&objectid=10870544
http://www.phonedog.com/videos/sony-xperia-z-video-review-part-1/ (part 1)
http://www.phonedog.com/videos/sony-xperia-z-video-review-part-2/ (part 2)
http://www.itpro.co.uk/smartphones/19353/sony-xperia-z-review
http://uk.hardware.info/reviews/4047/sony-xperia-z-review-sonys-flagship-full-hd-phone
http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/11/4084004/sony-xperia-z-review
http://gadgets.ndtv.com/mobiles/reviews/sony-xperia-z-review-341000
http://www.androidcentral.com/sony-xperia-z-review
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=GlhXpHULwys#
http://www.uswitch.com/mobiles/news/2013/03/sony_xperia_z_review/
http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-Sony-Xperia-Z-Smartphone.89509.0.html
http://pocketnow.com/2013/03/13/sony-xperia-z-review
http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/sony_xperia_z_review/
XDA User reviews
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=38586217&postcount=355 by me
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=38852962&postcount=380 by robogo1982
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m41CTSrKF3A by ashwin123
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2187090 by Teknohtc
http://www.insidehw.com/reviews/mobility/7638-sony-xperia-z by Mr. Corny
list of none reviews
Screen
good video showing the screen by our very own shem2509
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=38031308&postcount=342
vs lot's of phones
http://s.webry.info/sp/digital-baka.at.webry.info/201302/article_14.html (Japanese)
gaming and screen vs iphone 5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZZAzUXUoCw
Screen compare
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Mmeai9XjXRQ
Camera Compares
low light video vs note 2 and N4
http://www.xperiablog.net/2013/02/1...-shown-off-against-galaxy-note-2-and-nexus-4/
low light still photo comparison S3 / one x
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ySjZUtoieYI
Z and iPhone 5 Cameras and video side by side
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2QIHHTwX5w
Camera vs iPhone 5 by a professional photographer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0cN_NPSNu0 (video compare)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udzbOc5BROo (still compare)
Xperia Z up against Nokia’s camera kings – the Pureview 808, N8 and Lumia 920
http://www.mobilexperia.com/xperia-...-kings-the-pureview-808-n8-and-lumia-920.html
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pureviewclub/sets/72157632928702933/with/8534296302/
VS
vs Butterfly/Droid DNA
http://www.soyacincau.com/2013/03/10/camera-shootout-sony-xperia-z-vs-htc-butterfly/
http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_xperia_z_vs_htc_butterfly-review-906.php
vs Nexus 4
http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/reviews/...xperia-z-vs-google-nexus-4-comparison-review/
vs BB Z10
http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/reviews/...-blackberry-z10-smartphone-comparison-review/
vs HTC One
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KmbZFspFmo
Unsorted
quick battery test
http://blog.gsmarena.com/sony-xperia-z-undergoes-a-quick-battery-test/
promo video
http://www.mobilexperia.com/xperia-z-promo-video-from-sony-mobile-france.html
Proof of Baby Proofness
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKY2fn6IIuY
lot's of video's displaying the z from clove.co.uk
http://blog.clove.co.uk/2013/02/13/sony-xperia-z-interactive-image/
Drop tests
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61mW65hPJuY
hands on
http://www.androidaustralia.com.au/...anufacturers/hands-on-with-the-sony-xperia-z/
http://blog.gsmarena.com/sony-xperi...dquarters-we-do-video-of-our-first-encounter/
http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/48940/sony-xperia-z-pictures-preview
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0zvSJj_Bsw (French)
http://www.androidcentral.com/sony-xperia-z-hands-and-initial-review
preview
http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_xperia_z-review-884.php
For those that don't want to read all the reviews themselves I will try to add a non biased summary:
Build quality:
Most if not all reviews like the build quality and think it feels and looks like a premium device.
Water resistance works as advertised.
some drop tests where done (not on concrete) and it survived without a scratch.
Screen quality:
Reviewers like the way the screen looks but viewing angles could/should be better eg not as good as the competition, but better than previous Sony devices.
synthetic test done on 100% brightness paint a different picture, the screen doesn't perform as well as it's competition, although color accuracy is excellent.
1080p is nice especially for text but don't count on a spectacular difference with 720p
The reviews that mentioned sunlight readability liked it.
Battery:
Battery is generally regarded as good.
stamina mode works pretty good .
Speed:
Devices feels speedy, no hiccups or slowness.
Syntactic benchmarks find that is is faster than devices that uses the same SOC ergo very fast
Camera:
Some say it's good others say it's rubbish. My take is that it depends on your taste. It is a bit soft and doesn't have a high saturation, so some would say it looks natural while others would say it looks toned down. this is something that is fixable with PS or iPhoto. I'm curious about the performance with a 3rd party camera app.
Sound/ Call quality:
speaker is average and on high volume perhaps below average.,
call quality is average
sound via earplugs/headphone for music etc is good / excellent
Overall:
All reviews agree that this is the best Sony smartphone ever.
All reviews rate 4 to 5 stars or equivalent
Some reviews think it is the best smartphone currently on the market ( or at least you are able to order it) while others think that there are better phones or that it is best to wait for the new HTC/Samsung/LG etc.
Found another one
http://www.stuff.tv/review/sony-xperia-z
AnTuTu Benchmark
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Here is one from Clove
http://blog.clove.co.uk/2013/01/18/sony-xperia-z-review/
Thread already running here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1923889
---------- Post added at 09:44 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:42 AM ----------
Sorry, forget that - my mistake.
parapaul said:
Thread already running here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1923889
---------- Post added at 09:44 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:42 AM ----------
Sorry, forget that - my mistake.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well that's a every thing thread, this is a review thread. This makes it easy to find reviews
http://unleashthephones.com/2013/02...Phones+-+Mobile+Phone+News,+Reviews+and+More)
Night imaging capabilities of Xperia Z shown off against Galaxy Note 2 and Nexus 4
http://www.xperiablog.net/2013/02/1...-shown-off-against-galaxy-note-2-and-nexus-4/
Sony Xperia Z first battery test comes out pretty decent
http://blog.gsmarena.com/sony-xperia-z-undergoes-a-quick-battery-test/
low light still photo comparison S3 / one x
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ySjZUtoieYI
photos
https://plus.google.com/photos/+VodafoneAU/albums/5843897118265403057
http://www.androidaustralia.com.au/...anufacturers/hands-on-with-the-sony-xperia-z/
http://www.01net.com/fiche-produit/essentiel-13823/sony-xperia-z
Best one yet but not english.
omersak said:
http://www.01net.com/fiche-produit/essentiel-13823/sony-xperia-z
Best one yet but not english.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks, Google translate works well for this page.
I think at the end of the day, all top Android phones from Sony, HTC and Samsung are great, some will be a bit better in some departments but no landslide differences. And it just boils downs to style.
Personally I can't stand the Samsung feel, design and UI I think it is very ugly. So unless they change something in that department I will never own a Samsung.
For the current generation I would buy the HTC one X+ as the Sony T wasn't up to snuff spec wise (although I like the looks of the Sony better).
So for this generation it is again between HTC and Sony. While I like the one x and loved the original desire ,I just like the Sony design better (including UI). On top of that Sony has very good opensource support so, like I said before, unless HTC bringings a fantastic never before seen phone to the table I will keep my pre-order even if the Z is not the phone to end all phones .
I guess that all mayor hardware innovation except for battery are done do its maximum.
There is no real need for 1080p so even higher denseness would be insane.
Most if not all people I know how have an S3/iPhone 4/5 etc are perfectly happy speed wise, so while it is nice that the Z is even faster, and by a big margin, is not overly useful.
Sound etc are all good and for facebook, email, web photos all high end phones are pretty good.
What we miss is true software/hardware innovation to make use of the constantly increasing raw cpu/gpu power. So stuff like background video streaming to HDTV (wireless HDMI).
A desktop mode like unbuntu phone, but again should be able to do that while still using your smartphone as a smartphone.
And of course we need better battery tech.
Can someone tell me how I go about using Google translate so I can read the above review on my mobile please??
dibdin said:
Can someone tell me how I go about using Google translate so I can read the above review please??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use Chrome, I think it gives you the option to translate it automatically.
dibdin said:
Can someone tell me how I go about using Google translate so I can read the above review please??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
go to translate.google.com -> paste in the link -> click translate.
or use chrome as your browser as it is built in and will ask you if you would like to have it translated
Thank you guys.
stefanve said:
thanks, Google translate works well for this page.
I think at the end of the day, all top Android phones from Sony, HTC and Samsung are great, some will be a bit better in some departments but no landslide differences. And it just boils downs to style.
Personally I can't stand the Samsung feel, design and UI I think it is very ugly. So unless they change something in that department I will never own a Samsung.
For the current generation I would buy the HTC one X+ as the Sony T wasn't up to snuff spec wise (although I like the looks of the Sony better).
So for this generation it is again between HTC and Sony. While I like the one x and loved the original desire ,I just like the Sony design better (including UI). On top of that Sony has very good opensource support so, like I said before, unless HTC bringings a fantastic never before seen phone to the table I will keep my pre-order even if the Z is not the phone to end all phones .
I guess that all mayor hardware innovation except for battery are done do its maximum.
There is no real need for 1080p so even higher denseness would be insane.
Most if not all people I know how have an S3/iPhone 4/5 etc are perfectly happy speed wise, so while it is nice that the Z is even faster, and by a big margin, is not overly useful.
Sound etc are all good and for facebook, email, web photos all high end phones are pretty good.
What we miss is true software/hardware innovation to make use of the constantly increasing raw cpu/gpu power. So stuff like background video streaming to HDTV (wireless HDMI).
A desktop mode like unbuntu phone, but again should be able to do that while still using your smartphone as a smartphone.
And of course we need better battery tech.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same here, s3 is my first smart phone, and will be last samsung device forever. Hate the UI hate the cheapness of the phone, pentile oled is garbage. Sony and HTC are the only choice left for me on android phones really, but HTC new phones seems to be missing microsd lately, which is a big problem for me. Already have 10 gigs of songs on my sd card in my S3. Why is Xperia T spec not up to snuff? Its the same as the NA model of S3 just with less ram which I find to be not an issue at all since I never go over 800 mb usage on my S3. It comes out late but that doesn't make it weak, if so then the S3 would consider low end and weak by now and it still being sold for 600+ (buyout) in Canada as a flagship phone.
Gitaroo said:
same here, s3 is my first smart phone, and will be last samsung device forever. Hate the UI hate the cheapness of the phone, pentile oled is garbage. Sony and HTC are the only choice left for me on android phones really, but HTC new phones seems to be missing microsd lately, which is a big problem for me. Already have 10 gigs of songs on my sd card in my S3. Why is Xperia T spec not up to snuff? Its the same as the NA model of S3 just with less ram which I find to be not an issue at all since I never go over 800 mb usage on my S3. It comes out late but that doesn't make it weak, if so then the S3 would consider low end and weak by now and it still being sold for 600+ (buyout) in Canada as a flagship phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well in Europe it is relatively speaking weak h/w but will cost you only 370 euro. the original one x is 440, S3 is 465, one x+ is 535 all off contract.
So I think price wise it is a good deal but I still would pay an extra 70 for the one x
http://blog.gsmarena.com/sony-xperi...dquarters-we-do-video-of-our-first-encounter/

Record-breaking display responsiveness (touch latency) on the M8 ahead of Z2 and S5

Microsoft explained that high performance touch performance is becoming increasingly key aspect of a mobile device's user experience.
Microsoft report on Display latency
Apparently the HTC One's diplay latency is record breaking - measured at 46ms, ahead of other 2014 flagship smartphones, in particular well ahead of the S5 and Z2.
Source: Lesnumeriques.fr
It is not at the 1-20ms recommended by Microsoft but it is a great step forward considering the fact that 2014 smartphones barely go below 70ms. The previous record was held by the Note 3 with 67ms.
Here is the 2014 smartphone ranking:
HTC One M8: 46ms
Note 3: 67ms
Asus Padfone: 73ms
iPhone 5S: 75ms (same as iPhone 5)
Nexus 5 : 75ms
S5: 91ms (165ms with activated air view and deactivated "increased sensibility")
Z2 100ms (glove mode)
LG G2: 110ms
Note: the fastest tablet has 54ms (IPad Mini Retina)
Here is an overview for older devices:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
It will be interesting to track the performance of other devices: S5, Z2, etc...
Source
Lesnumeriques.fr
Here are touch latencies for tablets:
Source: appglimpse.com
That might explain my love in as to why I love this phone.
Sent from my HTC One_M8 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
600+delay how can you possibly use a device like that
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
batna.antab said:
600+delay how can you possibly use a device like that, hat
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes 0,6 sec but that's only one device. Thinking about it even 170 ms is a lot. Almost one 1/5th of a second...
Arthur Hucksake said:
That might explain my love in as to why I love thThat's one.
Sent from my HTC One_M8 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I think this plays an important role in the perceived snapiness of a device . that's also probably why I wasn't so impressed with the LG G2.
wow i am actually surprised that the Xperia Z does extremely well in this regard.
Hellscythe said:
wow i am actually surprised that the Xperia Z does extremely well in this regard.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would be interesting to see how the display on the Z2 compares
This is an incredibly important aspect of every phone that people shouldn't ignore like they seem to. Touch latency is one of the many reasons why iPhones have always seemed so snappy. Now that HTC has even surpassed Apple, it shows that, while Android has been relatively smooth for a while, with proper touch latency it can blow you away. Good job HTC and, yes, I did notice.
I have a hard time trusting that chart, I'm not anti Samsung or anything (in fact I love them) but there is no way in hell the s3 tested faster than the HTC One. Or any Samsung phone for that matter, the delay in touch responsiveness has always been my biggest gripe with Sammy products.
Sent from my HTCONE using xda app-developers app
Moderator Information
Guys as per forum rules, please keep the discussions device specific. Comparing phones against each other in a general way is against forum rules. If this keeps happening I will close the thread.
Ghost said:
Moderator Information
Guys as per forum rules, please keep the discussions device specific. Comparing phones against each other in a general way is against forum rules. If this keeps happening I will close the thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think this is one aspect of a phone where you need reference benchmark to put it into perspective. As long as the information is quantitative and not subjective, I think it serves the purpose of information HTC One M8 potential purchasers about how the device stands in the market.
Posts in other threads compare camera picture quality and benchmark results, which are much more controversial. I think as long as the comparison is factual,specific and quantified it does not fall into the "degenerative" opinion-based topic, which attracts haters and trolls, and I think that's the spirit of the rule to prevent that.
puremind said:
I think this is one aspect of a phone where you need reference benchmark to put it into perspective. As long as the information is quantitative and not subjective, I think it serves the purpose of information HTC One M8 potential purchasers about how the device stands in the market.
Posts in other threads compare camera picture quality and benchmark results, which are much more controversial. I think as long as the comparison is factual,specific and quantified it does not fall into the "degenerative" opinion-based topic, which attracts haters and trolls, and I think that's the spirit of the rule to prevent that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why is ghost ruining the party on every thread
Is the latency the same on the GPE? Any way to find that out?
Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
puremind said:
I think this is one aspect of a phone where you need reference benchmark to put it into perspective. As long as the information is quantitative and not subjective, I think it serves the purpose of information HTC One M8 potential purchasers about how the device stands in the market.
Posts in other threads compare camera picture quality and benchmark results, which are much more controversial. I think as long as the comparison is factual,specific and quantified it does not fall into the "degenerative" opinion-based topic, which attracts haters and trolls, and I think that's the spirit of the rule to prevent that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I must agree with you and disagree with the moderator that threatened to close the thread. I've been on XDA for a long time and threads like this that contain information that is not widely available need to contain data about other devices to give the data recorded for the M8 something else to compare it to. If we had the touch latency data for the M8 listed and no latency data for other devices then this thread would not be as informative.
Mod, please do your best to weigh the background information required to properly convey a data set (so long as it's not illegal/warez related) against the rules of XDA. Sometimes they need to be bent just a wee bit to convey certain information more completely to the layperson.
batna.antab said:
600+delay how can you possibly use a device like that
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
puremind said:
Yes 0,6 sec but that's only one device. Thinking about it even 170 ms is a lot. Almost one 1/5th of a second...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wondered that myself: what sort of a P.O.S. is that machine? On one hand, we're all so used to more-or-less 'immediate' response from our phones/computers/etc. that I'm sure anywhere else 600ms wouldn't bother us (vending machines, for example), but on the other hand when in comparison to other well-known hardware I'm sure we'd feel completely pissed off using the JMI whatever-it's-called.
Love to know why the Nexus 5 and any GPE doesn't make it to that graph... wonder why...
DeathmonkeyGTX said:
I must agree with you and disagree with the moderator that threatened to close the thread. I've been on XDA for a long time and threads like this that contain information that is not widely available need to contain data about other devices to give the data recorded for the M8 something else to compare it to. If we had the touch latency data for the M8 listed and no latency data for other devices then this thread would not be as informative.
Mod, please do your best to weigh the background information required to properly convey a data set (so long as it's not illegal/warez related) against the rules of XDA. Sometimes they need to be bent just a wee bit to convey certain information more completely to the layperson.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Putting in my +1 for this opinion as well. Given that this is the "general" board, it makes sense to discuss comparisons to other devices so long as messages remain on-topic to the top-level device. Messages forked off discussing only the GS5 vs Note3 would obviously be grounds for deletion.
With that out of the way, I brought up this touch response information to a developer I know who does a lot of work with both Android and iOS. His thoughts were, yea, the faster touch responsiveness of the M8 is nice, it's really nothing to get excited about. The numbers being reported about touch response time are just that; touch response time. What we need to be concerned about is application and overall response time rather than just touch.
Sure, touch is important since it's the first step in that overall equation, but while your input signal to the M8 device might be recorded by the touch sensor just that split second faster than other devices, it still loses the race in terms of application responsiveness. If an app on the M8 (or any Android device for that matter) takes 250ms to open (ballpark), that's still slower than iOS. Granted, iOS plays small tricks to hide the time it takes to launch some apps, but in general, the platform is still faster in terms of overall responsiveness and that feeling of snappiness.
Playing with the Sprint version of the One (M8) the other night, I really couldn't tell much of a difference at all in terms of overall response time between the M8 and M7 they had on display. The M8 actually felt only marginally faster than my current Evo3D.
onesolo said:
Love to know why the Nexus 5 and any GPE doesn't make it to that graph... wonder why...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was thinking the same thing. First two devices I looked for (besides the M8) was the Nexus 5 and the iPad Air.
Seems like this chart is slightly outdated.
rotchcrocket04 said:
I was thinking the same thing. First two devices I looked for (besides the M8) was the Nexus 5 and the iPad Air.
Seems like this chart is slightly outdated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The source web site is linked. They do this test in every review so anyone can look up their favorite device. I looked this up for you:
Nexus 5 : 75ms
IPad Mini Retina: 54ms
iPad Air: 58ms
puremind said:
The source web site is linked. They do this test in every review so anyone can look up their favorite device. I looked this up for you:
Nexus 5 : 75ms
IPad Mini Retina: 54ms
iPad Air: 58ms
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I should have clicked the source, thank you for providing that. Really interesting to see how responsive these new displays are.

Categories

Resources